User talk:ST47/Archive9

Sunday

24

November
2024

00:23 UTC

Archives

0x00

0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7

8|9|A|B|C|D|E|F

0x10

0|1|2|3|4

My Talk Page

My Contributions

ST47's talk page, archive 9

This is an archive of discussions past. Please do not edit this page, and instead visit User talk:ST47 if you want to leave me a comment.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47.

Wikimedia Foundation

Contents User:ST47/Stats‎ Hi, can you add the stats of this account as well, combine them with the stats of my old account (Jaranda). Thanks Jbeach sup 21:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC) I'm afraid I cannot. The bot really just parses SQL results, and I can't manipulate them in this way. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 22:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Reply to Image copyright problem with Image:JemtalentsearchVHS.JPG Image:JemtalentsearchVHS.JPG Hi, I created this image of the Jem: Talent Search VHS the other day, by scanning my copy of the video tape. This image belongs to me, but I'd like for it to stay on Wikipedia on the Jem (TV series) listing on Wikipedia for the purpose of showing an old video tape release of the TV series from the 1980s from Family Home Entertianment, under the show's Home Video releases section. Is there anyway I can get this image to stay on, or what proper copyright terms would fit this category? I just don't know anything about posting images on Wikipedia without the situation over copyright infrngement, etc., or whatever it is. Thanks. --User:Queen of Swords Oct. 23, 2007 1:02 AM Lord Loxley Hi, Yesterday you deleted the user pages for Lord Loxley (talk · contribs). I think I had a look at his talk just before, and if I remember correctly this was a banned user. In view of the editing history of Honour of Richmond, I wondered if Regiment (talk · contribs) could be a reincarnation. Was the deletion done at Regiment's request? /Pieter Kuiper 07:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC) User:BAGBot Hey there. BAGBot seems strangely quiescent. Mayhaps a swift kick in the diodes is in order?  :-) — Coren (talk) 00:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC) That's a lot of big words... --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Category:Olympic ice hockey players for Switzerland I don't have an objection to this. Where do I go to say I support this speedy deletion? Your bot did not make that clear to me? Chris 01:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Don't worry, I've deleted it - thanks! --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 01:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Christian Post Philosophy i am suprised that this article is deleted in just one day i cannot figure out the urgency of the deletion please inform me of what next to do —Preceding unsigned comment added by Motegole (talk • contribs) 10:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC) You deleted my talk page!!!! Where are all my conversations?? Why did you delete my talk page???? --Hetfield1987 (Wesborland | James Hetfield) 12:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC) It's marked as a temporary userpage, make sure you remove that category by the next time I go though. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 17:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC) Why deleting hi! please be as kind as to enlighten me about the politics of this Wikipedia (i'm more frequent in the Portuguese version of it) concerning redirects ? I mean Municipal wireless network is more frequently described as Municipal Wi-Fi, Muni Wi-Fi, Muni-Fi or even Mu-Fi. so, at least in Portuguese Wikipedia, these alternatives would have a redirect. But they all have been removed ?!?!? So, please tell me what should be done. All the best, --Hgfernan 17:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC) I have no idea what you're talking about. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC) since you, an administrator knows nothing about a policy concerning redirects, i suppose the links were removed for no good reason. so i recreated them. all the best, --Hgfernan 18:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC) I didn't remove your links. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC) javascript security I just checked the pages listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts and protected some that weren't. Could you check to see that I didn't miss any? -- Flyguy649 talk 18:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC) STBotI I uploaded the Box art Gauntlet (NES) Unlicensed version, with the information; Gauntlet by Tengen, for the Nintendo Entertainment System. I found most of the cover art images on Wikipedia use this, and I've done it before without it being caught by a bot, as stated on the Licencing summeray thing that is applied when selecting box art, it says. "This image is cover art for a video or computer game, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the game's publisher or developer. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of game cover art to illustrate the packaging of the game in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, constitutes fair use under United States copyright law. Other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information." I added the following message "The words "The #1 Arcade Hit" can be read just barely in this low-resolution image." but wasn't sure if it was because of the images size that the bot caught it or if I've been putting the discription stuff in the wrong place and this is the only bot that has caught it so far.(Floppydog66 19:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)) Have a look at WP:NFURG for the information you need to add. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 23:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC) User:AccReqBot I would like the source code for this bot, if you could. I would like to create a bot, and your bot is doing a lot of what my bot should do. Thanks in advance! Dreamy § 20:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC) That's easy ;) it's here :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 20:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC) I thank you royally!!!*Bows deeply*... Dreamy § 21:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC) Now, I would just like to ask one more question. How do I implement the code for use with a bot account? Dreamy § 21:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC) Just change the username, add a second argument for the password (line 7), and run it. You'll also need the two modules in this directory for it to work. (If you don't understand that, I'd suggest that you not run the bot, and post at WP:BOTREQ or here for another user who is more capable of operating it.) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 21:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC) Speedy deletion notice sent to the wrong person Regarding the speedy deletion of Greg Shaw Urologist, the bot sent the warning to the wrong person. I am the one who put the speedy deletion tag on this article. --Blanchardb 02:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Jira is that way. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 13:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC) IRC Can you remove my autoremove on Chanserv? --Flaaaaaaaaaaaming! 03:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC) No. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 13:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Why? Tell me why :) --Flaaaaaaaaaaaming! 23:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC) User:209.254.12.73 Yes, it was two hours ago, but this user edits pages on my watchlist while I'm at work and I get back to find he's still ignoring the warnings. It's not possible for me to report him from work. It's not like he's ever intending to stop until forced, as his previous IP, User:207.74.196.20 will testify. Any suggestions? Miremare 17:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC) The courtesy of a reply is too much bother, eh? Cheers then. Miremare 16:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Template:Politics of Canada I just wanted to express my sentiments about your comment at Template talk:Politics of Canada: rude, bullyish, and brutish. Poor form. --G2bambino 15:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC) PS: seeing as you're so thorough with images and their use, please do something about the non-free image used in this template; it consists of a collection of non-free images. It's apparantly acceptable use was what inspired me to create a similar image for Template:Politics of Canada. Furhter, Template:Politics of Australia, Template:Politics of Australia sidebar, Template:Politics of New Zealand, Template:Politics of the United States, Template:PoliticsUK, Template:Politics of Thailand, and, in fact, just about every politics template for every country, use non-free images. Seems you'll be busy. --G2bambino 15:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC) cricketer up for deletion Hello. I am the creater of this article Morshed Hossain. This is notable under the wikiproject cricket notablity criteria. To be notable you need to have played at least one first class or list A match which this player has acheived making him notable. I hope this explanation means that the article will now not be deleted. Thanks. 02blythed 09:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC) I'm concerned as to your reference to "Wikiproject Cricket notability criteria" - surely arbitrary groups of editors aren't making rules that affect the whole community? However, I didn't tag that article for deletion, I was just letting you know. If he does pass Wikipedia's notability criteria, WP:BIO, then I'm sure it will be kept. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Picture About the picture that is up for deletion uploaded by me. Stop messaging me about it all the time. I have reverted it several times but you still put it back. Delete it right now. Thank you Woop-Woop That's the sound of da Police 11:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC) I've deleted it, thanks. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007. The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery Volume 3, Issue 43 22 October 2007 About the Signpost Fundraiser opens, budget released Biographies of living people grow into "status symbol" WikiWorld comic: "George Stroumboulopoulos" News and notes: Wikipedian Robert Braunwart dies WikiProject Report: League of Copyeditors Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315 You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Bot reaction time adjustment request I uploaded a few logos recently and before I had the chance to construct a fair use rationale the bot had tagged the image within 2 minutes and spammed my talk page at the same time as in here and here. Could we make it wait a few more minutes? (Or alternatively teach it to be slightly more patient?) Many thanks. Dr.K. 01:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC) and here with reaction time, a record breaking 1 minute. Any less and we'd be pulling in the milliseconds. Dr.K. 01:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Actually, the unit of time just less than the minute is the second, not the millisecond. The bot is intended to tag recently uploaded images. Once someone uploads it, it leaves a bit of time for someone to modify it, then it processes the image. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 10:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the reply, but I was taking the limit of time as Dt->0 to emphasise the point. I was not following the next smaller order of magnitude. Aside for the math technicalities, one or two minutes is not enough to create a new rationale. If we can increase it to let's say five or six, it would be nice. Thanks. Dr.K. 15:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC) There IS a box on Special:Upload for this sort of thing, that way the instant it is uploaded it becomes legal. You're asking for a distinction between "Hey, I stole this laptop" and "Hey, I stole this laptop, but I'll come back and pay for it once I get enough money", and there is no such distinction. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 17:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Yes there is an upload field that takes some details such as summary etc. But it looks small so I did not attempt to paste a fully functioning fair use template inside. But if you say it works I'll try it next time. Thanks for the suggestion. Dr.K. 18:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Your tone I consider this tone unnecessarily hostile and disruptive. Signature issue was not even in my mind. My concern was spam bots and you just had to talk down on me. -- Cat chi? 02:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Block request on User:216.37.203.62 I put up a block request on the administator intervention page, and it seems like your bot treated my request as a comment on another request, which lead to my request being removed when the bot addressed the request above it. If you could look into this, I would appreciate it. – SJL 20:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Probably because of the spaces on either side of the pipe in your addition. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 21:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007. The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery Volume 3, Issue 44 29 October 2007 About the Signpost From the editor: Florence Devouard interview Page creation for unregistered users likely to be reenabled WikiWorld comic: "Human billboard" News and notes: Treasurer search, fundraiser, milestones WikiProject Report: Agriculture Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Watchlist details Hi - I see you've moved the arbcom message from MediaWiki:Watchdetails‎ to MediaWiki:Watchlist-details‎. I have some css code in my skin css (classic skin) to switch off displaying these messages, unfortunately it doesn't seem to work for the new message. I don't recall where I originally found the information about how to switch off the messages. Can you offer any advice please? – Tivedshambo (talk) 07:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC) I've updated your standard.css - you have to add: #arbcom-election-2007 {display:none} Replacing arbcom-election-2007 with the name of the div, which you can find from looking at page source. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 10:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC) That works - many thanks. – Tivedshambo (talk) 11:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Tangler speedy deletion Hi. Ive recently rewrote an article for Tangler which has been deleted a total of 4 times in the past. Could this article please be left on Wiki just for a week or so as I want to add more information to it and improove it before it is deleted again. Thanks. HappyWanderer 14:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HappyWanderer (talk • contribs) 13:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC) I'm not the one who nominated it, however I agree with the nomination. You've added the hangon tag, but it may be easier to write it first, then post, rather than storing an incomplete article on the wiki. Also, if it is deleted, please use WP:DRV instead of recreating it. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC) bot spam While I appreciate the notice that an empty category I originally created is being deleted, I only need that info posted to my talk page once, not 3 times. I've removed that entry from my talk page 3 times now and it just keeps coming back. Please fix your bot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtphokie (talk • contribs) 12:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Barnstar The Original Barnstar Thanks for korean system messages. :) WonYongTalk 12:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC) No problem, that's my job :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 12:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Deletion notice I asked that all my messages be left at User talk:Porcupine; you may not have noticed this.--Porcupine (see my userpage for details) 15:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Clarifications to my RfA I have clarified question #5 on my RfA, please check again to see if you wish to change your stance. Thanks. OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC) Unicode problem STBotI notified users who don't exist, i.e. User talk:Óðinn rather than User talk:Óðinn. Dragons flight 22:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC) ko: mediawiki pages ST47, I noticed you created several foreign language MediaWiki pages here on en: what are these for? — xaosflux Talk 05:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC) They're translations of names in our navigation bar - main page, and so on - into korean. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 11:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC) signature illegible Your signature is very, very interesting but difficult to read and doesn't say "ST47". Consider a minor change to (ST47) uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Regards, Mrs.EasterBunny 19:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC) You're right ;) How's this: --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Non-Tor blocks Hi ST47, During August and September, you blocked hundreds of Tor network open proxies without any contributions, some for five years. However, searches on these IPs using this tool indicate many of these are not Tor proxies, and are reporting NAK. For example, user:211.69.195.34, with no contributions, was blocked for five years as a TOR proxy, but the tool reports it is not a Tor proxy. When you blocked the IP, you also subst'ed the TOR proxy block template onto the page, which at that time unfortunately contained a link to this sperm image, and now all the pages that were subst'ed contain that link (the template itself has since been fixed, but the subst'ed IP pages all have the link to the sperm image). It looks as though you blocked quite a few non-Tor IPs with the 5 year Tor block. Did you use a script to block all of these? I undid a few the other day where there were complaints. Will you help me sort through this? Firsfron of Ronchester 21:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Yes, a script which took the IP and exit policy was used to assist in the banning. Unfortunately, many Tor nodes change IPs, which is why I started using shorter blocks. I haven't reviewed the early blocks, but I can do so in the coming week. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 21:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the reply. I'm going to go ahead and unblock a few of the IPs that aren't (now) Tor exit nodes that were blocked for five years, to try to prevent collateral damage. Do you have a script to fix the links to the sperm image? Firsfron of Ronchester 21:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC) See this. Cheers. --MZMcBride 21:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks for removing so many of the links. I removed a few myself. Of course, this still leaves the blocked IPs, which I haven't yet gone through. Firsfron of Ronchester 23:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Yeesh, this is a bigger project than I expected. I found 47 5-year-blocked IPs on this page alone. What sort of script were you using? Firsfron of Ronchester 00:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC) Image copyright problem with Image:Parbold Bottle.jpg Can I now delete this warning from my user Talk page? It appears to be "second time lucky". Martinevans123 22:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC) Yeah, looks like the image is good now. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC) HBC AIV helperbot4 Why does the bot remove my reports to AIV [1] [2]? Doesn't he like me, because I'm creating too much work for him there? ;) --Oxymoron83 19:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC) Wow, he doesn't like you! I'd say you're right, it's an edit conflict, except the software just lets the bot go through, since it doesn't edit like a normal user. I'll look at the code later on to see if I can optimize the amount of time between loading and saving. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC) FYI, I just benchmarked this, and it takes 1-2 wallclock seconds for the marking routine to run, timed from right before it loads the page to right after it saves it (thus, including server load time). Benchmarking from exactly after the load to exactly before the save, it takes 0.0006 wallclock seconds, give or take. Probably not a lot that can be shaved in there :) I think this was just a matter of bad luck for one user to be hit that way twice in the same day. I don't see much that can really be pared out in the code, but feel free to look and see if you find anything that I didn't! —Krellis (Talk) 16:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC) I got similar results yesterday. :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Bot keeps restoring its warning The bot has warned me about Grant Street (Pittsburgh) three times now, the first one now on User talk:NE2/Archive 9 and the others on User talk:NE2. --NE2 07:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Further, I can understand why this edit from the bot happened - it's annoying that it didn't notice the warning above, but since the one above was manual, I can forgive the bot. But this edit, when it had already warned me? That should be coded for! :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC) Regarding the first edit, it isn't supposed to do that, at least, I don't want it to do that - I'll review it and open a bug. Regarding the second edit, it's a known issue, and I'll add it to the same bug as the above issue. (info be here) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC) Let me be the first to congratulate you. ...that is if you are the user ST47 on stardust@home; for discovering a possible particle from outer space. (Just was looking through the candidates list, and your name looked familiar from irc and wikipedia) -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 15:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Josephine Ho Please restore Josephine Ho. She is extremely famous here in Taiwan and you must have been crazy to delete it. Jidanni 10:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC) User:Caknuck deleted it, not me. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 13:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC) OK, you might even want to emphasize on your templates: "xxxx" is the bad guy who deleted your article, User:ST47 is the good guy who alerted you to the damage. Jidanni 00:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC) heh! Maybe I should make that more clear :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Two of your bots Hi, I've found a couple of bugs with two of your bots: At [3], ImageBacklogBot did not remove the image correctly. It incorrectly assumed that the ]] at the end of 'India' was the end of the image tag (it wasn't) and also it left a space at the beginning of the line which messed up the formatting. Looking at the code for AccReqBot, at lines 97 and 104, you've hard coded in the year 2007. You might want to change this so that the bot still works next year. Tra (Talk) 18:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks! The second is easy enough, I'll have to fix the regexes for the first - maybe I'll just make it throw a warning in that case, also pretty easy. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC) re: extension It's been awhile since I've looked at that one, but I've copied to SVN and done a little cleaning. -Steve Sanbeg 20:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks, I'll have a look :D --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 20:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC) I've made a small change to allow things like &assert=bot&nassert=exists to work. I'd agree it's ready for use; then we can look at whether more complex and/or are useful. -Steve Sanbeg 21:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Excellent - that's the big reason that my patch was incomplete. I'll ping TimStarling when I see him and point him here, and see if he caninstall it! Thanks for your help, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC) HK films PLease see Hong Kong films of 1968 now. Hiding the lines is better than removing them - they are there then for when I return and fill it ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Talk"? 14:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC) OK. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 14:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 15th Regiment of Foot officers You, or your bot, :o) - just advised me of a speedy deletion tag on the article I just created. The article was created in error instead of a category. :( - Please delete ASAP. Many Thanks. Richard Harvey 14:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC)  Done --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 14:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC) Image:Armisticetrain.jpg and Image:Bobcat2.jpg Can you please delete Image:Armisticetrain.jpg and Image:Bobcat2.jpg? You uploaded these images which were used on the English Wikipedia's Main Page. Since images from the Wikimedia Commons which will be used on the English Wikipedia's Main Page are protected via the "cascading" protection, there's no need to upload them here; see commons:User:Zzyzx11/En main page. -- ADNghiem501 02:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Images on commons are not protected through cascading, not automatically. I'll delete them because they're no longer on the main page, but you lot need to figure out what your policy is on main page images. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC) (edit conflict) They're indeed protected because, in the Wikimedia Commons, they're transcluded into commons:User:Zzyzx11/En main page which is protected with the "cascading" option enabled, not here. In the future, if you upload temporary copies of images from the Wikimedia Commons for the Main Page, use {{C-uploaded}} which is a correct tag for those images. {{Mprotected}} is only used for images that are on the English Wikipedia and on the Main Page. -- ADNghiem501 23:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Minor details which are not a big deal. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Finally, Image talk:Bobcat2.jpg needs to be deleted per WP:CSD#G8 because its main title "Image:Bobcat2.jpg" no longer exists in the English Wikipedia. And for your last comment above, what minor details? -- ADNghiem501 23:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC) ST47/OCT Thanks! CBM and I (mostly CBM) cleared through the list. Most of the pages were simply redirects left over from a pagemove and were quickly deleted. The remaining few were otherwise handled (moved, incoming links updated) and deleted. – Black Falcon (Talk) 23:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Great :D --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Arbitraries, unacceptable. You write: "Good afternoon. I'm advising you that due to continued edit warring at Free Zone (Scientology), you are being banned from editing any Scientology-related articles for another 30 days. This ban will expire on December 13, 2007, at 0:00 UTC. Note that if you violate this ban by editing these articles, you will be blocked. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)" a) you did not give any warning. b) I was not edit warring, but Fahrenheit451 was reverting me over and over again (he reverted my edits, not vice versa). c) I am thus not following your logic. Nor do I follow why the provocateur here does not even get ticked. Makes me think you have a different agenda, you know. Also that you "thank" me, for what, the good feeling to beat somebody who tries to enforce Wikipedia police and "no commercial advertisement"? Hard to believe. So, can you be more clear about this? Shutterbug 00:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC) As an afterthought, I might add that your action is effectively making any consensus impossible, will not improve the article. Why? Because what you say would exclude me from what you said on the article page. You froze it until a sortout is done and then you eradicate 50% of the debatants (which is me and Fahrenheit451). I just can't imagine that this is your purpose. Shutterbug 00:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC) With all due respect, you reverted his removal, did you not? The arbitration gave you plenty warning to get your act together, and in fact you just came off another ban not two weeks ago. Furthermore, Fahrenheit 451 has been advised that he should not continue edit-warring, but as that particular page is protected, sanctions against him are not necessary, unless you can show me that he has a history of edit warring on more than one article, in which case he will be warned, and if he attempts to edit-war again, he will be blocked. Finally, it's typically considered to be polite to sign off with some sort of nicety: good night, see you, or thanks all work just fine. With regards to your afterthought, well, edit warring wasn't improving it either. The arbcom has placed these articles on probation. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Oh, and to clarify, I've eliminated 50% of the warriors, not the 'debatants'. As far as my ban goes, you're free to discuss this with him, which is what you should have done in the first place. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Hm, this is not right. Fahrenheit451 is always part of any edit war with any Scientologist on Wikipedia. That's easy to prove. He just provokes and provokes and I have fallen for him earlier, that is true. The only action improving this article and any such article is a) to freeze it and b) to have all parties sort it out on the talk page. I welcomed you freezing the article (I would have asked for that on AN/I and have done so with other articles plenty of times). The sorting out part is what I am doing right now. Check it out, I think it'll work. Shutterbug 01:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Well, he's been warned, and if I see him provoking or participating in edit wars again, he'll be placed under the same ban you are. I'm certainly glad to hear that you're pursuing a solution, and if a solution is found, then I'm willing to shorten your ban. I'll keep an eye on the article's talk page. Have a good night, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 01:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Well, I am going to work in a short while and might be back in a day or two. I am disagreeing with the ban. Before you go and leave this open unhandled, please cite some policy and why it is applied on me or what you expect me to do. There is no ban in the arbitration committee proceeding and I did my 30 days already, actually more than that. Double punishment should not exist at all, also not on Wikipedia. Aside that there is no point in that, taking the goal of better articles as something to reach. Shutterbug 02:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC) WP:AP, especially WP:APROB, and the enfocement number 7 i believe in the rfar. There is no double punishment, this is a separate ban for continued offenses. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 02:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC) I'm back. The discussion on the article talk page is done and resulted in a compromise article. I'm fine with it and don't intend to further work on it, except for eventually adding information (if I find some). Now, can you re-visit the subject and let me know? Thanks. Shutterbug (talk) 07:00, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Hi. Are you working on this or not? Misou (talk) 04:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC) I understand now. You are part of this "club", aren't you?. Misou 03:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007. The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery Volume 3, Issue 45 5 November 2007 About the Signpost Wikimedia avoids liability in French lawsuit WikiWorld comic: "Fall Out Boy" News and notes: Grant money, fundraiser, milestones WikiProject Report: Lists of basic topics Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation Volume 3, Issue 46 12 November 2007 About the Signpost Unregistered page creation remains on hold so far WikiWorld comic: "Exploding whale" News and notes: Fundraiser, elections galore, milestones Wikipedia in the News WikiProject Report: Missing encyclopedic articles Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Helper bot Hi. Any idea why the helper bots have stopped removing blocked users from Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2? —Wknight94 (talk) 14:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC) I had a play with it and it looks like it's working again now - hopefully that's it sorted. Ryan Postlethwaite 14:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Fantastic! So what broke it? And what fixed it? (So I can try to do the same in the future). —Wknight94 (talk) 14:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC) It's generally means something's wrong with the header of the page. I reverted back to a revision yesterday when the bots were working and had no problems[4] and luckily it started working again! If you see the diff, it was something to do with one of the functions of the bot being turned on. Ryan Postlethwaite 14:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC) You mean those little parameters that have no meaning to me and I figure will send the bot spinning off into space? Great. Guess I'll let someone else fix them in the future too... —Wknight94 (talk) 14:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Hehe, well I don't have a clue what the mean either - that's why I revert and hope for the best. If that fails to sort the problem, the best thing is to run away and hide! Ryan Postlethwaite 14:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC) What? I can't hear you. I'm hiding. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Aha, I think I know what happened. There was a spacing change in a place that shouldn't matter, but did to older versions of the helperbot. That combined with the fact that my hosting provider blew something up, so helperbot3 went down, and helperbot4 must be running a slightly older version of the code, so it couldn't handle the change in spacing. That explains why the "broken" revision worked when I tested it in my sandbox - if helperbot3 had actually been up at the time, it would have worked as well. ST47, you might want to make sure helperbot4 is on the latest source code when you get a chance. —Krellis (Talk) 15:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Will do. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC) MediationBot1 error Correct me if I'm wrong, but I heard you recently made some changes to MediationBot1 (talk · contribs). If that is the case, would you by any chance know what might have caused the bot to make this error with the date? -- tariqabjotu 20:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Probably the fact that I have no idea how perl's localtime works. I've corrected it. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC) A user from COFS Arbcomm history/issue is violating your topic ban FYI, it appears that Misou (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is violating your topic ban. Check his contrib history. Thanks. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 07:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC). Your comment on Misou (talk · contribs)'s talk page: DIFF, and Misou's edits after your topic ban, to Scientology-related articles: DIFF 1, DIFF 2. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 07:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC). Thanks for letting me know. I've clarified the reasoning for the ban, as there seems to have been some confusion, and I will watch for further violations. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Okay, sounds good, thanks for the response. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 11:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC). It might also be helpful to note this at the appropriate section here, just so that other pertinent parties are in the loop. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 11:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC). Please see User talk:Newyorkbrad#ArbCom ban has been reinstated. The user is still not clear on the basis for your extension of the ban, which states that it was based on "edit-warring" and he or she appears to have made only one edit on the article in question. Perhaps you could offer a further clarification, on my talk or elsewhere, if I have correctly understood the basis on which you were acting. Thanks and regards, Newyorkbrad 18:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC) Sig Heya...this might be a peculiar one, and it sure as heck is a selfish one...could you do something different with your signature? Just glancing at yours gives me eye-aches (precursors to migraine), and I don't want to have to avoid your postings! --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC) I suppose so, would it be easier if I just took the offending part and put it in a div so you could css it into oblivion? User:ST47 11:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Now I'm intrigued. What font do I need to see the offending parts? All I see is squares. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC) It's mostly unicode - it's the text "stfourtyseven" upside down. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Conflict in Wikipedia Peace be Upon you - السلام عليكم there is an obvious clear competition, if not a conflict going on between Arabs and Persions members in Wikipedia, and is taking the conflict to the next level, which is Wikipedia Credibility... i have created a page called Al Ahwaz which is a region with Arab majority, seeking independance, while Iran on the other hand denies any problems in the area, then i was sent a speedy deletion notification request, but i was away for a time that period and didnt check my talk page.. so i would like to know why it was deleted and by whom... and how can ethnic and racial conflicts be seperated from Wikipedia... as a user, i wish that the issue gets discussed by the Wikipedia Administrators... and im not only talking about Iranians and Arabs, but between Turks, Greeks and Armenians, Chinese and Japanese, Indians and Pakistanis, French and English, Argentinians and British.... Arabs and Israelis, etc... thank you Peace be with you - تصحبكم السلامة --Arab League User 17:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC) The user who you should ask is User:Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh. Have a good day, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC) excuse me i did post information about the brent wilson copyright info! Why are you saying I didn't? JazzlineB 22:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC) There is no information about copyright, only ownership. See WP:ICT and the tag on the image for more information. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC) SEO for wiki articles I noticed you tagged my images. I think I fixed them the images are mine to use, so I used the drop down tab to highlight that to that effect. Also, how can I optimize the wiki entrys I did to show up at as a high listing on google. I see that when I type in certain words/search terms on google, the wiki article shows up as one of the first few results. Does it take a while for google to do it automatically? Is there anything I can do to speed up the process?? Thanks! -- Achasearchitect (talk) 19:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC) It will take a while for google to see a new article. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:44, 16 November 2007 (UTC) page protection Free Zone (Scientology) When do you lift the page protection? Neither User:Misou nor User:Shutterbug participate on talk page anymore. I think they won't since the page is protected in their version and both are topic banned for a month. User:Fahrenheit451 and me have reached consensus and even propose some changes in favour of Misou and Shutterbug(remove advertisement in idenics section). Could you take a look at talkpage and consider to unprotect the article ? -- Stan talk 21:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Done. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC) How about an answer? Shutterbug (talk) 06:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC) To what question? --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC) AIV helperbot removing extra report Somebody recent pointed out what looks like an error at Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism#AIV Helperbot mistake? -- specifically looking at this edit where two IPs are removed, but only one is mentioned in the summary. Last I knew, they only remove one entry at a time. The particular bot in this case directs inquiries to your talk page, so. ;) Just thought I should bring that to your attention. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Yeah, this has been happening a lot recently. I concur with Krellis's evaluation of the edit. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC) SoxBot I see you have accepted my bot. Thank you! One thing though, will it have a flag? Soxred93 has a boring sig 03:00, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Yes. A Bureaucrat should process the request for a flag within 2 days. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 04:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC) I'm still good to edit using Python, though? Soxred93 has a boring sig 04:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Yep, as long as it's the substing task. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 12:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC) panic! could you please confirm the date of birth for Brent Wilson? I'm asking because your bot talked to me about both my pictures and so I'm assuming you are associated the with Panic! at the Disco project. So if you know could you please tell me? JazzlineB (talk) 04:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC) I have no idea, and am not associated with and wikiprojects. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 12:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Problem with another editor Hi. I got your name from the Abuse Reports/Volunteer page so, I hope it's ok if I leave you a message here and that my inquiry fits into the abuse category. Basically, the problem is with an editor named Dooyar. Long story short, me & another editor got into a bit of a tiff with him/her over the Karyn Kupcinet article. Needless to say, they were blocked twice for being rude. The last ban was for 48 hours on November 10. After that, I'm fairly certain they created sockpuppets (one with an actual name, two using anon which they have owned up to using in the past) to create some sort of illusion that someone is one their side and to make unsourced addition to articles which are usually reverted by anyone that can read (sorry, couldn't help myself!). I've already reported them for being a sockpuppet, but that process is incredibly slow. In the meantime, they have continued to be uncivil and have also attempted to delete the the Karyn Kupcinet archived talk page twice and have removed maintenance tags from a page (the latter two done under the anonymous IPs in which their usernames have been connected to in the past). I know the sockpuppet issue cannot be dealt with until proper research is done, but is there a way to stop them from repeatedly attempting to delete talk pages, reverting edits that anyone dares to dispute or remove, and removing tags when the issues haven't been addressed? As I stated before, they know the rules they're violating and they choose to ignore them. Thanks! Pinkadelica (talk) 07:46, 17 November 2007 (UTC) You want WP:SSP for this, but remember that they're allowed to remove stuff from their talk page, and if they do, it's assumed that they read it, and can be blocked if they continue.--uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 12:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC) I'm logged out! Hi! Just letting you know that as of right now, BAGBot.pl is running logged-out from 24.0.64.193 (talk). Thanks, BAGBot. Good bot :D --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 18:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Quick question on talk pages Hi, I noticed that Anonimu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) regulary blanks his user talk page and I was under the impression that this was not acceptable. Since I only do some RC patrolling on WP and sometimes revert user talk pages that have been blanked I just don't want to do any mistake. You're the last admin that attempted to refrain him from doing so in July, why did you stop ? Thanks Mthibault (talk) 19:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC) I think consensus has moved to allow users to do that, assuming that, as they're blanking it, they've read the message. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC) OK but then how are we supposed to keep track of the right vandalism level template to use ? Mthibault (talk) 12:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007. The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery Volume 3, Issue 47 19 November 2007 About the Signpost An interview with Florence Devouard Author borrows from Wikipedia article without attribution WikiWorld comic: "Raining animals" News and notes: Page patrolling, ArbCom age requirement, milestones Wikipedia in the News WikiProject Report: History Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC) The M class diesel Yes I have got your message, me S302B74Y161. As you have had more experience with deleting stupid articles, can you delete the article ASAP ! What you wrote is very confusing, so please simplify it If you want to discuss this futhur, or anything else please leave a message on my talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by S302B63Y161 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC) Your Bot Edited your ARBLog, and was logged out, it seems, under the IP adress of 24.0.64.193. See this diff, and afterwards. <DREAMAFTER><TALK> 02:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Umm...4 months ago...--uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 12:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Your bot request Hi ST47 I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ImageBacklogBot is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! --BAGBotTalk 06:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC) User:ST47/NFI Just having a look at this page here. Am I free to remove images listed there as completed once I have checked it, or should I strike it, which do you prefer? :) — Save_Us_229 06:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Whatever you please, I'd prefer that you removed them to make it cleaner - I'll be regenerating the whole thing every week, though, so if you only do a couple, it isn't a huge deal if you leave them in. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007. The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery Volume 3, Issue 48 26 November 2007 About the Signpost Arbitration Committee elections: Candidate profiles WikiWorld comic: "Cursive" News and notes: Ombudsman commission, fundraiser, milestones Wikipedia in the News WikiProject Report: Education in Australia Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC) the speed of your bots Hi. Is there any chance you can slow down your User:STBotI?  :) The reason I asked is because I uploaded Image:Crossover (ST-DS9).jpg and then a minute later, you added the use rationale both to the image's page and my talk page. It would be nice to have at least 2 minutes or maybe even 5 before your bot takes affect. By the way, I do appreciate what your bot does. It reminds people to add the rationale so they don't forget. Thanks for reading this. Rockfang (talk) 16:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC) I meant to increase the delay before I started it up again. It's fixed :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 21:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Much appreciated. Rockfang (talk) 22:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC) CSDWarnBot Is it possible to have this bot not add a csd warning template when there is one already in place? See this talk page where the bot added a warning when the user had been warned a while before. This would save the bot time, and not make the user feel like we are ganging up on them with all the templates. Thanks. KnightLago 02:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC) No - they were different names. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 03:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC) User:ST47/OCT If it's not a bother, could you please do a new database run for User:ST47/OCT? CBM and I cleared through all (or almost all) of the ones – including subpages – that should be deleted; however, recently there were a number mass renames and deletions of categories that had corresponding talk pages (I'm specifically thinking of the 120 or so Gaelic games-related categories). Thanks, Black Falcon (Talk) 08:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Done. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 13:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you. Black Falcon (Talk) 18:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Deleted images On November 25, you went through and deleted a lot of resized Fair Use images (contribs), but I've noticed that a lot of them actually weren't deleted. For example, Lego Loco.jpg, Horus.jpg, and Hard-Fi - In Operation.jpg. There seem to be hundreds more that day. Is this a bot problem? tiZom(2¢) 15:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC) That's strange, but probably due to the changes made to the deletion interface - it looks like the js changed the tag, thought it deleted the revisions, but didn't actually do it. I'll go through and mass-revert the removals, then try it again, failing that, I'll just do it manually. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 17:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Image tagging bot Your bot tagged Image:Baltimore City College logo.png as not having a fair-use rationale, but I uploaded it with a full rationale using {{logo fur}}. Just thought I'd let you know as it appears not to recognize that form of rationale. Dylan 18:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC) I'll look into that. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 18:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC) I've corrected the bot to check for logo fur in all templates on the page, rather then just the first one. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC) It happened again today: [5] --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007. The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery Volume 3, Issue 49 3 December 2007 About the Signpost Signpost interview: New Executive Director Sue Gardner Arbitration Committee elections: Elections open  Possible license migration sparks debate Featured articles director names deputy  Software bug fixed, overuse of parser function curtailed WikiWorld comic: "Wordplay"  News and notes: Wikipedian honored, fundraiser, milestones Wikipedia in the News  WikiProject Report: LGBT studies Features and admins  Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation  Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Odd CSDWarnBot bug? Take a look at this: [6]. Race? — Coren (talk) 20:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC) More likely, the bot failed to load the previous content. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 20:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Please explain Hi, can you please explain why my vote was annulled by you? I thought it said 150 main space edits were required but maybe I'm wrong about what a main space edit is. Can you please explain? Thanks! --LordPathogen (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Hey! The only problem is that the requirement is 150 mainspace edits before november 1 - that is, these edits. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks! --LordPathogen (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Suffrage Per this edit, I was wondering why you believe that suffrage is limited to people on earth? Is there anything in the rules which forbids voting from space? (I actually read it that way initially, since I was looking at diffs. Pretty funny.) Guettarda (talk) 23:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Heh - I see how you would read it that way! ;) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Edit summary for AccReqBot Hi. Could you please make your bot write an edit summary when welcoming new users? Something like "Welcome" would be better than this. Thanks. --Meno25 (talk) 04:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Yep, done :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC) That change to the code seems to have missed out a closing quote so the bot has now stopped working. Tra (Talk) 14:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC) It's supposed to tell me when it doesn't work >.> fixed :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 14:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC) The Dawning Dear... STBotl... you are right, I'm not sure about the copyright issues with the picture. I have removed the picture from the page "The Dawning", but I'm not sure how to remove the whole image/image page... could you do that? thanks, Adair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adaircairell (talk • contribs) 21:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC) It will be deleted automatically within a week or so. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 21:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC) I have a question about... I just posted an image a few minutes ago with my schools mascot. I do not think that the image is copyright, but I could be wrong. One of your bots gave me a warning (which is good). I do not know how to prove that this has no copyright or that I have permission to use it. Could you help me please. Thank you. Nsh22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsh22 (talk • contribs) 02:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC) White Cat Re:this - while I appreciate that you are passionate about your beliefs, please bear in mind that comments like that can be very hurtful. White Cat is no saint, but he's far from the worst user here. Raul654 (talk) 02:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Re deletion of Janine Fallon Mower at the Woodstock NY Page Janine is a noted local author. The placement of information was patterned after the local author Ed Sanders. It is my intention to add other local author names to the scroll over a period of time google janine fallon mower and see what comes up under the books she has published. contact me if you have any questions. roscommon girl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roscommongirl (talk • contribs) 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Clandestine HUMINT asset recruiting deletion I will try to report this as well through your bug reporting, but, the first time through, I had an error message that "reporter" was required; either I missed that or there is a bug in the bug reporting. This was a good-faith spinoff from an article that had grown too long; another spinoff was made with no problem. What's happening? hcb at netcases dot net if you prefer. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Indeed. "What is this?" is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion, last time I checked. I'd appreciate it if you could provide an explanation regarding the criterion under which you deleted this article; or, alternately, restore it. Kirill 15:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC) It isn't a necessary article, it reads like an essay, it's OR, barely referenced, reads like advice rather than information, the 'case study' section has no reason to be in a Wikipedia article, and in fact the entire 'series' of articles doesn't belong here. There are limits on what information belongs on Wikipedia, expanding beyond that is why we use external links. We're here to tell people how stuff works, in the most basic sense, not to tell them how to be 'clandestine humint assets'. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC) That's a pretty decent explanation of why you don't think the article should be here, but which one of those is, in your opinion, a CSD criterion? Kirill 22:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC) So, are you intending to respond to my question? Kirill 07:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Since you're apparently unwilling to discuss this further, I've taken the matter to DRV (Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 December 10#Clandestine HUMINT asset recruiting). Kirill 17:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Swatjester Why did you mark out InkSplotch (talk · contribs)? Dragons flight (talk) 00:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC) [7] didn't have suffrage. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Oh, I didn't notice we were counting mainspace only. Dragons flight (talk) 00:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Ahh - yep ;) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 02:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Why? Why you wrote blocked from uploading. STBotI [edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Gold Medal "World Academy of Art and Science Benefactor of Humanity.jpg I can not get to the page of the picture to write there that it is a picture made by myself, the medal belongs to my fatherinlaw and his name is on the medal. I really don't know what is the problem? He realy received it! The pictures made about the Hansen Hospital in Jerusalem are mine too. I live in Jerusalem and i made the pictures. So this picture are made by me: [edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Hansen's Disease Hospital in Jerusalem.jpg Image copyright problem with Image:Hansen's Disease Hospital in Jerusalem second picture.jpg [edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Team at Hansen's Disease Hospital in Jerusalem 1 .jpg Dr. Sheskin Gizel Dr gizel (talk) 13:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC) image where is the policy that says non-free can't be used on user pages...so i can see it Ctjf83 talk 08:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Non-free content criteria #9 is the most direct, but most of the other criteria can also disallow it. --Carnildo (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC) perlwikipedia Wouldn't mind helping ;) Q T C 12:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC) See, I never even looked at those test scripts >.> let's see...revision 112 committed :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 13:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Still wouldn't mind helping. See if I can't figure out why I was getting weird memory problems so I wont have to write it all from scratch again :) Q T C 13:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC) You're free to submit patches, but give me a while to get settled in before adding committers. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 13:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Just open an Issue for it? Q T C 15:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Or let me know here, or via email... --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 15:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC) My article about San Base has been deleted. Why??? I got this massage from bot: "San base is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article." Could you explain me where is a "blatant advertising" in this text: San Base (born 1956) San Base is a contemporary Canadian artist, born in Russia. He has pioneered the Dynamic Painting technology - a revolutionary painting presentation method that breathes a life into previously static images. Using the latest in computer technology, a still picture is transformed into a never-ending show that adds a whole new dimension to traditional Art. Images replacing each other hour by hour, day by day, month by month. None of the images repeat previous ones and will never repeat again. The picture living its own life with objects moving and transforming but still following the original artist's concept. San Base lives and works in Toronto External links: [8] San Base official website [9] Computer Graphics Avant-Garde [10] Self-shifting digital paintings As you can see - News.com, Toms Hardware, Globo.com and Der Spiegel published articles about this artist. Why it has been rejected by wikipewia? I do not see a logic. I didn't delete it, I didn't tag it. The message my bot left you should have included a link to find out who did, but I see no messages on your talk page? --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 17:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC) The message is: Spam in San base Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on San base, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because San base is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting San base, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lashenko" See where it says "To see the user who deleted the page, click here"? Click there :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 17:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Request for clarification Hey ST47! I was just wondering, after seeing this, whether ImageBacklogBot has been mistakenly marked down twice. I understand they were passed at different times but I just need to know for tomorrow's features and admins section in the signpost. Regards, — Rudget speak.work 18:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Not sure what that was about, fixed it though :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you! — Rudget speak.work 19:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC) User who can't use headings coming to whine Hello ST47 I'll put up the information about local Woodstock author once again and we can discuss why she should be listed in an on line encyclopedia. Her writing accomplishments are on par with the other author's who have been listed in the wiki to date. all the data is verifiable roscommon girl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roscommongirl (talk • contribs) 21:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC) User:Kubigula deleted it, as my bot told you. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 21:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Oops Bots/Requested for approval/Approved Oops. Thanks for seeing that, since ImageBacklogBot wasn't removed from Bots/Requests for approval I thought it wasn't on the approved page. Anyway, thanks -- maelgwn - talk 22:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Error with BAGBot BAGBot needs to be logged in! 91.198.174.194 (talk) 23:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC) AfDBot AfDBot appears to have run into some sort of issue. See here. The Deletions by date table lists no debates as closed. The Category table looks OK. Just thought I'd drop a note. thanks! ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 23:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Encoding issue, fixed. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Replacement of image at sandbox One of your bots replaced an image of Ian Richardson that I was storing at my sandbox with an example image (I've restored it pending advice). I was keeping this as a template for part of a message I was going to send to another user's talk page. Is this an erroneous move by your bot or am I breaking a rule? Retarius | Talk 05:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC) You aren't supposed to use those fair-use images outside of the mainspace. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks. I've deleted the image. Retarius | Talk 04:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC) Campaign for an Andover Town Council Please can you explain why it is considered necessary to delete this page. We are a democratic, non political organisation campaigning to have a local town council. Please check legitimacy of this organistaion by doing searches on Google etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andoverian (talk • contribs) 17:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Looks like someone thought it wasn't important enough - see WP:CORP and WP:NN for policies on that. User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington deleted it, at the request of User:Sbowers3, if you'd like their reasoning. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC) user page deletions I dont usually work on delting user pages, so 'd like to find out where in WP:CSD 'temporary page; too old" is given as a reason fore deleting? You seem to have deleted several hundred user and user talk pages with this rationale. DGG (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Temporary userpages - CAT:TEMP. It's considered maintenance. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Ah. glad to know about this. I admire your dedication to the unswept corners. DGG (talk) 03:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Giano votes Sorry I reverted your changes![11] Some of those editors look like they meet the threshold now, but did not meet the minimum edit threshold as of Nov. 1. Others came close but didn't meet it. You're watching those voters very carefully. Sorry for the clumsy move and the unwarranted bewilderment. I've been drinking again.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Heh - that's alright :) And it's not careful watching...I haven't checked all 3167 supports and 2139 opposes (that's the number of valid ones, anyways) - I have a bot that reports every vote, as it happens, checking if the user has enough edits, and another that runs on all voters on-demand. I didn't really even expect to see this many such votes, but we're keeping an eye on it :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 02:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Well this may be due to the fact that in my case your bot doesn't know that I'm the user formerly known as MartinDK who has more than plenty of mainspace edits. I expect you to reinstate my votes (all of them as you indented all my votes in the election). If you want proof then see this. I'm entitled to abandon an old account due to real life stalking without losing suffrage. At least two crats and several admins are aware of my old account - you really shouldn't have a bot doing this on this scale. The bad faith assumption behind this is just another disappointment and reason I stay away from this place at the moment. EconomicsGuy (talk) 07:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC) I have restored EconomicsGuy's votes. I hope you are checking the other bot red flags to see if the users are actually ineligible. Jeffpw (talk) 09:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC) As the bot is not capable of recognising users who have suffrage an a prior account, all its flags must be checked manually. It might be best for it to dump the names to a page rather than automatically indent them. A WP:AN/I thread has also mentioned this, see WP:AN/I#Arbcom bot?. I would imagine any further false positives may result in the bot being blocked until this is resolved. Neıl ☎ 09:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Ah, I didn't notice you're running the bot on your main account. That would make blocking for problem behaviour impossible, so please discontinue running it in its current form. Neıl ☎ 10:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC) I'm not quite enough of an idiot to run this fully automatically. The bot isn't making any decisions. I plug in the user who appears to be bad, and it does my bidding. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Well, the I hope you will be more careful when checking the bot's work. EconomicsGuy was not pleased at all about his votes being struck. Are you notifying others when you strike their votes? Jeffpw (talk) 11:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC) No, he's not. Tex15:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Your bot Please tell your bot that I have provided a rationale for my image of an Abby Hayes book cover. Have a nice day. --Alisyntalk 03:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC) helpI need sommeboody, not just aannybody. dear ST47, I placed a holdon and I wrote a statment of purpose relating to my wiki article: Asa Dodsworth. When I submitted the "talk statement" the article had already been deleted, an it appears therfore my statement additionally disapeared, Can you help me dig up that statement so I can post it on my talk questions page, and or someother appropriate place. Addittional I would value a copy of it my own records. I would additionally like a copy of the Permaculture Army post I made.. You all seem terribly busy, is there perhapse someone else I could correspond with. I have other responsiblitites like Exams, Work, UCberkeley Treesit logistical support, Berkeley Garbage and Recycling Commissioner I am. But I am very interested in exploring and supporting the power of the wiki system, I need the advice and wisdom of a wiki sage, or seasoned adventurer. I am currently getting doors slammed in my face, and I value my work. ps.. When I extoll the virtues of wikipedia,my brother law loves to point out that the Conneticut State Page, has described conneticut a sandwich for a while, can you help me formulate my well intentioned edits. Moped45 (talk) 05:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007. The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery Volume 3, Issue 50 10 December 2007 About the Signpost Wikipedia dragged into German politics over Nazi images Wales comments on citing Wikipedia produce BBC correction  WikiWorld comic: "Kilroy was here" News and notes: Elections, Wikimania 2009, milestones  Wikipedia in the News WikiProject Report: Greater Manchester  Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News  The Report on Lengthy Litigation Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Removing links to fair-use image Please stop Removing links to fair-use image on my userpage! Why your bot doing this? I don't have time for work that the bot destroy. Thank you! --Beyond silence (talk) 15:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC) I apologize for the bot's repetitive edits. The bot is correct here, because images which are copyrighted may not be used in userspace, per WP:NFCC. If you think any particular image shouldn't have been removed, please let me know. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Do nice things, get nice stuff... :) The Original Barnstar For outstanding dedication to your fellow editors. You have repaired my monobook. You reflect great credit upon yourself, English Wikipedia, and Wikimedia. Mercury 20:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Thanks :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 20:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC) A question Hi, I'm just curious... why didn't I have suffrage when voting for Deskana? -- Mentifisto 21:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC) WP:AC2007 requires 150 mainspace edits before November 1 - this view shows those, and by my count, you have 70 such edits. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Ah okay, thanks. -- Mentifisto 23:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Another question... how did you make your upside-down signature? :-p -- Mentifisto 23:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC) I found a site that changed letters upside down on google - search for flip text, or something. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 23:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Cool, this seems to be it, although the font looks different... -- Mentifisto 23:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Hi I stole that banner thing you have in the bottom right corner of your userpage and adapted it to mine. Hope you don't mind! Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 02:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC) That's OK, I stole it myself :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 02:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC) Ah, so we can form a band of roving thieves then. By the way, your signature is trippy. Master of Puppets Care to share? 02:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)