Jump to content

User talk:Ruby2010/Archive 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10←Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17

Thank you

The Good Article Barnstar
Ruby2010, I hereby award you The Good Article Barnstar for your thorough and comprehensive review of Joshua Soule Zimmerman. Because of your careful guidance and patience, this article now meets Good Article criteria. Thank you! -- Caponer (talk) 03:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Caponer! Very kind of you! :) Ruby 2010/2013 03:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Tom Cruise filmography

Hi. Hope you're well. Just to let you know that I've sorted your comments on the FLC. Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Tom Cruise filmography/archive1. Anything else you can think of that could improve it? Cowlibob (talk) 10:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

DYK for Frances Jocelyn, Viscountess Jocelyn

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello My name is Abigail and I am a student at American University I am taking a course about Wikipedia and Public Knowledge and am completely inexperienced when it comes to editing. I am attempting to edit pages as part of the Wikiproject, Women Authors. I just edited the page for Frankenstein and was wondering if you had any helpful tips. thanks so much

3143628a (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

February 2015 Wikification drive

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

The Black Moth at DYK

I have reviewed this and have some comments/concerns, which are expounded both in the DYK template & at greater length on the article talk page. I hope to get around to reviewing the list of works later today, but at this rate it might be tomorrow. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Now done second article. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:19, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!!!

Happy Valentine's Day, to you and yours! Cheers, Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Resuming work on Operation Lost

Hey, I'm resuming work on my Operation Lost project. I'm working on White Rabbit now and am having trouble finding production information– I can't find any commentaries or other production tidbits that aren't already there. I was wondering if you knew anything. Pinging @Igordebraga: because I know they were working on Lost articles too. Thanks in advance. -Newyorkadam (talk) 06:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Newyorkadam

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Presentation proposal for Wikimania 2015

How to pick up more women...
Hello! Victuallers and I have developed a proposal for a talk to be presented at Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women... -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. Examples include the Edit-a-thon blitz during WikiWomen's History Month and the "new articles" work underway by WikiProject Women Writers. The Wikimania talk proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that this proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you'd be interested in the talk if you were attending it (it does not commit you to attending Wikimania). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of works by Georgette Heyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Corinthian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of several of Godot13's quality submissions during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Australia Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: List of works by Georgette Heyer

Congrats on the list's promotion! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks AB! :) Thank you again for commenting. Ruby 2010/2013 03:19, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Indeed! Congrats! Great author to be highlighting, Sadads (talk) 03:54, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

  In the area? You're invited to the
   Art+Feminism meetup
  Date: Sunday, March 8, 2015
  Time: 12:00 - 4:00pm
  Place: Walker Art Center
  

Hi Ruby. I hope you can join us at the Walker this Sunday. By the way, I don't know if you work much on pre-Victorian women writers, but the Wikipedia Library is now offering accounts with the Women Writers Online database. gobonobo + c 09:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

DYK for List of works by Georgette Heyer

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for The Black Moth

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Persuasion (1995 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WGBH. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Maintained template up for deletion

Hello, this is just a quick note to make you aware of the current deletion discussion for the {{Maintained}} talk page template which you have used on some article's talk pages. Cheers! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

.


DYK Cathleen Mann

DYK nomination of Cathleen Mann

Hello! Your submission of Cathleen Mann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusunW (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Alexandra Byrne

Ruby2010, great job on expanding it. Saved me all that time and work hah! :) Lapadite (talk) 09:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! I stumbled upon Byrne while expanding Persuasion. So she was on my watchlist and I noticed your edit, which led me to expand it further. So I should be thanking you for reminding me about her! :) I plan on nominating the article for DYK soon. Feel free to jump in if you have anything else to add. Ruby 2010/2013 14:42, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement

  • Hello Ruby2010:
Please consider participating in this week's vote for TAFI's upcoming Week 17 collaboration. Last week's voting did not receive many participants. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 16:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

DYK for Cathleen Mann

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015 Wikification drive.

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the April drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 03:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


The Signpost: 01 April 2015

DYK for Alexandra Byrne

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Raised by Another

The article Raised by Another you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Raised by Another for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

File:Chocolate-Easter-Bunny.jpg
All the best! "Carry me down, carry me down; carry me down into the wiki!" (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

DYK for Jane Spencer, Baroness Churchill

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Ruby. I'm just posting to let you know that List of colleges and universities in North Dakota – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 18. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter

C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) is a long-period comet discovered on 17 August 2014 by Terry Lovejoy; and is one of several Featured Pictures worked up by India The Herald (submissions) during the second round.

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Belarus Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.

Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

DYK Georgiana Howard, Countess of Carlisle

Hello! Your submission of Georgiana Howard, Countess of Carlisle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Oh, I'm sorry to raise a footling query about the length of the hook. Everything else seems fine. I hope it can be sorted out easily. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 20:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 23:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
I've returned here because I don't want to over-complicate the discussion at DYK. She must, surely, have been reading Oliver Twist. Is it OR to say that? Replacing "in Dickens' stories" with "in Oliver Twist" produces 199 characters. But would that hook be supportable from the source? Thincat (talk) 08:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
I think that would be too much OR, unfortunately (but it would have made a great hook!) Ruby 2010/2013 14:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

DYK for Georgiana Howard, Countess of Carlisle

Harrias talk 07:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Well hello

I actually still exist even though I haven't really edited in over a year. There was just too much to do at once and I was overwhelmed and moved on to other writing projects. Still, who knows, if I get a lot of sources for something I might come back. Regardless, I started watching Fringe a couple of weeks ago and I'm on the second season and I'm really enjoying it :) Hope you're having a great time Glimmer721 talk 22:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

DYK for Lady Charlotte Finch

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia Library looking for Partner Account Coordinators!

Hey Ruby2010: it occured to me that you might be a really good fit for the Wikipedia Library's account coordination volunteer team, because you have been a really strong contributor and really good at interacting with other users! Account coordination only requires a limited amount of time (a few hours a week at peak time), helping screen and approved editors for one (or two) of our donations at WP:TWL/Journals. Its a relatively limited amount of time per month. Would you be interested? Check out our application at Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/Coordinators/Signup, Sadads (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I will consider it! Ruby 2010/2013 21:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:ROMANCE!!

Welcome, glad you joined! As you can see, the project is only a couple of days old, so any policy and guideline fleshing out that you'd like to do, please feel free. Or if you want to discuss first, that's cool too! How did you hear about it? I'm trying to get the word out, so if you know of anyone else who'd be interested, let them know. We also have a user box: {{User WikiProject Romance}}. I used to be very active on WP back in 2006, but am a little rusty and might not be as up-to-date as I used to be on policy (I used to be an admin) plange (talk) 02:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. Ruby 2010/2013 13:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Yay, glad to have your expertise on board! I'm currently trying to get consensus on which articles are which importance, and I've got a rough outline up on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Romance/Assessment plange (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015 Wikification drive.

Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the June drive has been started. Come on, sign up! :) "A wiki of beauty is a joy forever." Seriously. That's how long it'd take to read! (talk) 04:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lady Charlotte Finch

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lady Charlotte Finch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 08:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lady Charlotte Finch

The article Lady Charlotte Finch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lady Charlotte Finch for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

Some Advice?

Well, I just got addicted to editing again, and for a change I've been working on A.S. King, an author I've read a lot of recently. However, I don't think I've really edited biographical articles before. I haven't added all that I could, but in terms of the structure I'm beginning to hit a roadblock. Her books have just garnered so many awards and recognitions (including end-of-year lists, as well as starred reviews which haven't even been mentioned yet), and the list on the page is already long and outdated, missing her most recent books, but none of her novels have their own pages (yet...). Is there a better way to categorize that? By book or by year? (My template skills were never the best and now they're especially rusty, considering I couldn't do my old cite web properly.) Along those lines, I'm also not sure how much I should include on critical reception; I assume that isn't necessary on this sort of article, but the books don't have individual pages. (Also I'm nearing the final stretch of season 3 now...it's so addicting.) Glimmer721 talk 18:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Hmmm... I haven't really written that much detail on any authors either! Maybe you could review Georgette Heyer for inspiration? Oh, and I think S3 is one of the best seasons of television, ever. Truly amazing writing/acting (which made it all the more disappointing that the Emmys generally ignore science fiction, to their detriment!). :/ Ruby 2010/2013 21:40, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
I think I'm going to use one of these tables, though I would like to make it collapsible...is that built into the template? (I'm terrible at tables.) And yes, I agree, I have 3 episodes left and I'm a little bit afraid to finish the season! Glimmer721 talk 15:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Sense and Sensibility (soundtrack)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fringe 6955 kHz.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fringe 6955 kHz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fringe Amber 31422.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fringe Amber 31422.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lady Charlotte Finch

The article Lady Charlotte Finch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lady Charlotte Finch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 07:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar for You!

The Good Article Barnstar
For your contributions to bring Lady Charlotte Finch to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work!  — Calvin999 07:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 18:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

The Signpost: 24 June 2015


The Signpost: 01 July 2015

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

Fantastic job

Just saw you created a page for Lord of Scoundrels-- can't believe WP didn't have it already! Just wanted to drop a note to say that the article is looking fantastic! Are you going to do a GA nom? plange (talk) 04:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, plange! I couldn't believe it wasn't an article yet either! And yes, I nominated it for GA earlier tonight. :) We'll see how it goes! Ruby 2010/2013 04:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Great! Such a classic book. My fave of hers is Mr. Impossible :) With Karanacs getting Vision in White through FA, and now this, we're on a roll with the book articles. I nommed Sherry Thomas for GA a couple of weeks ago, but haven't heard a peep. Maybe the GA cup will help relieve some of the backlog there. plange (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

Your GA nomination of Lord of Scoundrels

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lord of Scoundrels you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 12:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lord of Scoundrels

The article Lord of Scoundrels you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lord of Scoundrels for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 12:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Girl with a Pearl Earring (soundtrack)

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fringe Bishop Revival.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fringe Bishop Revival.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:00, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

Wikipedia Library Past Masters account check-in

Hello Ruby2010,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Past Masters through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Please make sure that you can still log in to your Past Masters account. If you are having trouble let me know.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. If you would prefer to contact me directly about your experience with this resource, please leave a message on my talk page.

Thank you, Wikipedia Library Past Masters account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 12:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Turn of the Screw (2009 film)/archive1

Hi Ruby, I hope this finds you well. You may remember that when I peer reviewed Persuasion, I mentioned that I had a similar article (a BBC costume drama TV film adaptation of a classic novel- even with some cast crossover!) heading FA-wards- well, The Turn of the Screw has now been nominated at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Turn of the Screw (2009 film)/archive1. If you get a chance (but no pressure!) I'd appreciate any feedback you might have. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes of course! I shall review this soon. Ruby 2010/2013 04:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lord of Scoundrels

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

DYK for Lady's Magazine

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shane Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shinobido. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter

The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Scotland Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Philadelphia Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

  1. Belarus Cas Liber (submissions), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
  2. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
  3. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
  4. Somerset Harrias (submissions), second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
  5. Washington, D.C. West Virginian (submissions), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
  6. Somerset Rodw (submissions), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
  7. United States Rationalobserver (submissions), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
  8. England Calvin999 (submissions), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

Thank you for participating

Logo of Women in Red Logo of the Smithsonian Institution
Thank you for your interest in Women in Red and for your participation in the virtual Women in Leadership Edit-a-thon, 7-20 September 2015. It was a resounding success with over 160 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated! We'll keep you posted on future events. --Ipigott (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

  • Dates: 15 to 25 October 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in association with Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation, Women in Design, and Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a series of "physical" Guggenheim edit-a-thons. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in architecture and design to participate. The campaign aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a field that by its nature combines both. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over a week and a half, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in this field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 09:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

Invite to the Minneapolis Institute of Art

Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon
  • Date: Saturday, October 24, 2015, 12pm–4pm
  • Location: Minneapolis Institute of Art Friends Community Room, 2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis
  • Sponsor: Minneapolis Institute of Art
You are invited to attend an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon at Minneapolis Institute of Art which will be held on Saturday, October 24, 2015. This editing event is dedicated to improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to women artists.
--gobonobo + c 20:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

WikiCup 2015: The results

WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. Belarus Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to United States Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup Award

Awarded to Ruby2010 for participating in the 2015 WikiCup. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

Orphaned non-free image File:Katherine, Anya Seton 2006 edition novel.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Katherine, Anya Seton 2006 edition novel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruby2010/Archive_15&oldid=1125493642"