Jump to content

User talk:Ruby2010/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17

WikiCup 2014 June newsletter

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, Scotland Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to Florida 12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from Bartošovice v Orlických horách Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions).

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

Your GA nomination of Skin Deep (Once Upon a Time)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Skin Deep (Once Upon a Time) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gabriel Yuji -- Gabriel Yuji (talk) 02:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

Your GA nomination of Skin Deep (Once Upon a Time)

The article Skin Deep (Once Upon a Time) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Skin Deep (Once Upon a Time) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gabriel Yuji -- Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

The article House of the Rising Sun (Lost) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:House of the Rising Sun (Lost) for things which need to be addressed. 23W 03:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

The article House of the Rising Sun (Lost) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:House of the Rising Sun (Lost) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. 23W 03:11, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Skin Deep (Once Upon a Time)

The article Skin Deep (Once Upon a Time) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Skin Deep (Once Upon a Time) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gabriel Yuji -- Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

FAC closures

Hi Ruby, tks again for your sterling efforts closing promoted/archived FACs in the absence of a bot. One thing, {{subst:Fa top|result=}} just has to go at the very top of the review page, above the header with the article name... :-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Ah, I see I was misinterpreting the closing instructions there. My apologies! Will be sure that the header gets placed in its proper position in the future. Thanks for the note! I do rather enjoy doing them (I've had limited editing time lately, so it feels like I'm at least helping with something by doing a needed task that takes a set amount of time to perform). Regards, Ruby 2010/2013 17:10, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

DYK for House of the Rising Sun (Lost)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:51, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hearts and Minds (Lost)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hearts and Minds (Lost) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. 23W 06:30, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hearts and Minds (Lost)

The article Hearts and Minds (Lost) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hearts and Minds (Lost) for things which need to be addressed. 23W 08:44, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

Your GA nomination of Hearts and Minds (Lost)

The article Hearts and Minds (Lost) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hearts and Minds (Lost) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. 23W 04:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harriet Leveson-Gower, Countess Granville you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 23:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Left some comments there. Seattle (talk) 04:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of My Lord John

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article My Lord John you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 23:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

GA Cup

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

WikiCup 2014 August newsletter

The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:

  1. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer, finished top of Pool A and was the round's highest scorer. Godot is a featured picture specialist, claiming large numbers of points due to high-quality scans of historical documents, especially banknotes.
  2. Scotland Casliber (submissions) is a WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist every year since 2010. In the semi-final, he was Pool B's highest scorer. Cas's points primarily come from articles on the natural sciences.
  3. Nepal Czar (submissions) was Pool A's runner-up. Czar's points come mostly from content related to independent video games, including both articles and topics.
  4. Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Pool B's runner-up. Another featured picture specialist, many of Adam's points come from the restoration of historical media. He has been a WikiCup finalist twice before.
  5. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) won the WikiCup in 2012 and 2013, and enters this final as the first wildcard. She focuses on biology-related articles, and has worked on several high-importance articles.
  6. Florida 12george1 (submissions) is the second wildcard. George's points come primarily from meteorology-related articles. This year and last year, George was the first person in the competition to score.
  7. Colorado Sturmvogel 66 (submissions), the third wildcard, was the 2010 champion and a finalist last year. His writes mostly on military history, especially naval history.
  8. Canada Bloom6132 (submissions), the fourth and final wildcard, has participated in previous WikiCups, but not reached any finals. Bloom's points are mostly thanks to did you knows, featured lists and good articles related to sport and national symbols.

We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Herm Matty.007 (submissions), Ohio ThaddeusB (submissions), United States WikiRedactor (submissions), Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), Greece Yellow Evan (submissions), Portugal Prism (submissions) and Bartošovice v Orlických horách Cloudz679 (submissions) have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.

There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.

There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

WikiProject Women writers Invitation

Hello Ruby2010/Archive 14! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women writers. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women writers, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women writers on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women writers page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

WikiProject Good Articles - GA Cup


WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers.

Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition.

Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges.

Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

Thanks for the expansion on Ruth Myers (costume designer)

I have done quite a few of the Oscar nominated people and glad you expanded one! (There still are some Oscar nominated/winning costume designers with no pages though) anyway thanks again! Wgolf (talk) 03:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! :) Glad to help. I found Myers from Category:British costume designers and have plans to tackle some more with expansions. Ruby 2010/2013 03:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Harriet Leveson-Gower, Countess Granville/GA1

I left you a message regarding the original GA-reviewers inactivity. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 13:58, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Stub contest

A quick note to say that as of this evening you've got 30 points - and there's three days still to go, so if you've any more to add please get them in soon :-). Thanks for the contributions! Andrew Gray (talk) 22:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2014

October 2014 Wikification Drive

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 September newsletter

In one month's time, we will know our WikiCup 2014 champion. Newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) has taken a strong lead with a featured list (historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876) and a raft of featured pictures. Reigning champion Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) is in second place with a number of high-importance biology articles, including new FA Isopoda and new GA least weasel. Scotland Casliber (submissions), who is in his fifth WikiCup final, is in third, with featured articles Pictor and Epacris impressa.

Signups for the 2015 WikiCup are open. All Wikipedians, new and experienced, are warmly invited to sign up for the competition. Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may also like to sign up for the GA Cup, a new WikiCup-inspired competition which revolves around completing good article reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

The article Harriet Leveson-Gower, Countess Granville you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harriet Leveson-Gower, Countess Granville for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Emma 1996 TV drama.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emma 1996 TV drama.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

Your GA nomination of My Lord John

The article My Lord John you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:My Lord John for things which need to be addressed. jonatalk to me 23:25, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Ruby2010. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Past Masters account signup.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Stub Contest award

The Stub Barnstar
To Ruby2010, thanks for getting involved in the Stub Contest and improving some stubs. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

WikiCup award

Awarded to Ruby2010 for participating in the 2014 WikiCup. J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 21:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014: The results

The 2014 WikiCup champion is Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. Scotland Casliber (submissions), WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.

A full list of our prize-winners follows:

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

I think you might have be interested in WER. Mainly, we have the main talk page, which is a mish mash of different discussion, and of course, we have the Editor of the Week program, which is where editors (members or not) nominate good editors for the recognition. For the EotW, we tend to focus on gnomes, article creators, and people who quietly work on improving the encyclopedia. No admins or drama lovers. It gets heated on the talk page sometimes, but I've always believed that sometimes a little heat can help people work through issues, assuming the parties are open minded and have non-political goals. Women are underrepresented at Wikipedia, although much of that may be western culture and other factors. Our goal isn't to assign blame, it is to find solutions, help new people, mediate some and honest debate about retention issues. We are 100% non-political, there is no "official" stand on any policy, no belief in a singular way to do things. We are just a group of people with the same goal: retention. And we are proud of the fact that four of the Editor of the Week recipients have ran for and obtained admin status, including Anna Frodesiac and Anne Delong. There is no central leadership, although I'm the guy that started it some time back. Everyone is equal, no one's word is law, there are no special rules, ranks or hierarchy. We have 169 members, but the traffic is typically light. We will announce important policy related activities, but we don't take a stand, we don't tell you which way is the "right" way to vote. It doesn't require a lot of time or commitment. You can list yourself as a member, or just lurk from time to time. We would love to hear your perspectives, if you are so inclined. Dennis - 07:24, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Dennis, thanks so much for the invitation. That project looks really great, especially with the description you provided above (indeed, I think the Gender Gap Task Force could learn some things here about what it takes to discuss and find solutions). I was particularly struck by this "Our goal isn't to assign blame, it is to find solutions, help new people, mediate some and honest debate about retention issues.". I have added my name to its list of members. Thanks again! Ruby 2010/2013 18:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

BNA access

Hello, Ruby2010. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Chris Troutman (talk) 02:28, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

WikiCup 2015 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.

  • We would like to announce that Josh (J Milburn) and Ed (The ed17), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out.
  • In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (Sturmvogel 66) and Christine (Figureskatingfan), who are joining Brian (Miyagawa) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the GA Cup, which she now co-runs.
  • The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

If you are interested...

... in another Fiona Apple collaboration, I just began working on Container (song) and it looks like it should be pretty easy to expand to GA status. Just thought I would extend an invitation since we worked on this list together and you did such great work on "Dull Tool". If you are not interested, or don't have the capacity to help at this time, no problem. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I hadn't heard that song before you posted here! I like it and would be happy to help. I see you're doing the Wikicup this year, like me -- would you be open to continuing its expansion in January and submitting it then for GA? (Crafty me speaking) ;) I probably wouldn't have time to help with it before next month anyway, due to the holidays! Ruby 2010/2013 17:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Sure, no problem! I participate in the WikiCup every year, but more just to support the project/concept in general and never with the intention of winning. But I still submit the content I promote to GA status, etc., and usually make it 1/2 through the competition or so, which is fun. Happy holidays and I look forward to working on the article soon! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
By the way, if you are looking for another WikiCup article to finish expanding and promoting to GA status, "Dull Tool" looks like a good candidate to me! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

This is to inform you that Sense and Sensibility (film) , which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 10 January 2015. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 10:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for that, much better. I had to squeeze the text down to 1200 characters; was there anything I left out you'd like to see put back in? - Dank (push to talk) 19:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Nothing that jumps out at me but I'll be sure to add anything that comes to mind! (that character limit can be so pesky!) :) Thanks for copyediting the blurb. Ruby 2010/2013 22:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
My pleasure. - Dank (push to talk) 22:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
I've checked the first five sections and subsections of the article and done a little copyediting. It looks great, but could you check AmEng vs. BrEng please? I see a lot of ises and izes. - Dank (push to talk) 02:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
I've checked for instances of ise vs ize and corrected them (always difficult writing British articles as an American – thank you for bringing those to my attention!) Ruby 2010/2013 02:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Precious again! - DYK that I have pride and prejudice on my user page? More personal here, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

👍 Like Congrats on the Main Page appearance! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

It's so good to see Sense and Sensibility on the Main Page. Huge congrats! - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks everyone! :) Ruby 2010/2013 21:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

British Newspaper Archive access

I approved your application British Newspaper Archive almost a month ago. I've still not received your information as my e-mail to you requested. If I don't have your information in my spreadsheet by 5 January, I'll archive your application without action immediately thereafter. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder. I'll get that taken care of within a day or two. Ruby 2010/2013 21:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

Your GA nomination of The Lady's Realm

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Lady's Realm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

new

I've let JM know that the Lady Mary Hamilton under construction banner has been removed. Thanks for jumping all over that article, Ruby; that was great :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Lady's Realm

The article The Lady's Realm you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Lady's Realm for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 13:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frances Jocelyn, Viscountess Jocelyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victorian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

DYK for The Lady's Realm

The DYK project (nominate) 09:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lady Mary Hamilton

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Frances Jocelyn

Hi Ruby! I hope all is going well with you. I'm not sure if you remember me, but I recently became active here again and just noticed all of the great work you've done since last I checked. I reviewed your DYK nomination for Frances Jocelyn, Viscountess Jocelyn, and I have one small concern regarding citations. Could you please give that a check and add the necessary citations? After that's done, either hook should be good to go.-RHM22 (talk) 23:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello again. I made a mistake in my initial review, accidentally referring to ALT2 (which was and is fine) instead of ALT1, which is the sentence which needs a direct citation as the hook. Sorry for that mistake.-RHM22 (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2015