User talk:Rhododendrites/2016a

Anna Olson

Thanks for removing that notice for proposed deletion. I got a notice stating she was not notable which is false and it was up for deletion. I will do what I can to improve the page. Will you? Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

@Fishhead2100: Hi. I was just going through the articles that had been proposed for deletion yesterday (User:Cyde/List of current proposed deletions). That she looks to have hosted several of her own cooking shows says to me the article should at least have the benefit of going through AfD. I still have some of the sources up from when I did a search yesterday. They're not slam dunks, but they may be helpful, so I'll link them here. That said, I don't actually know anything about her and food shows/baking isn't really my thing -- just saw an article that didn't merit deletion. :) It's worth noting that I saw at least one of her shows was also proposed for deletion, so if you know more and know the shows to be independently notable, you might want to take a look. Sources: Vancouver Observer interview, Gastronomia & Cia, Georgia Straight, chch, Playback, Hello Magazine, on CTV, Canada.com. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response. I appreciate the links. We can put the in the article where necessary. Also, we can format the current references to make them look better. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 18:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year Rhododendrites!

Happy New Year!

Rhododendrites,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. ツ Pdebee.^{(talk)(guestbook)} 18:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.

Dear Rhododendrites,
Thank you once again for all your wonderfully helpful assistance, and for everything else that you do in support of our encyclopedia. I wish you a great New Year in 2016!
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^{(talk)(guestbook)} 18:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

@Pdebee: Thanks very much. Happy New Year to you! — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Founders

I would also like to wish you a happy new year and hope you had your tongue embedded in your cheek when you talked about obnoxious - I certainly did. From the little I I have seen, you do good work here. Ottawahitech (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me

@Ottawahitech: Well, part of that comment was tongue-in-cheek (or just cheeky), but it was the part you seemed to respond to as though it were a serious part of my argument. So that's a shame :) The "obnoxious" comment was not, as I did not (and still have trouble) reading "RIGHT ON" as anything but sarcasm (which I suppose you're entitled to, under the circumstances). But regardless of whether my comment was in response to something sarcastic or good-natured, it certainly doesn't help or add anything, so I went ahead and struck it.

I do appreciate the message, by the way. Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Rhododendrites!

Happy New Year!

Rhododendrites,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Rhododendrites: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. North America1000 13:08, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Definition lists and semicolons

Hi there. With regard to this edit, you might want to read H:DL and MOS:ACCESS, which address the use of semicolons. Basically, when you use a semicolon to bold text without directly following it up with a colon, it generates invalid HTML. This can cause problems for screen readers for the blind, and some web browsers will improperly render the page. If you simply must remove a section header, I suppose you could replace it with boldface text using apostrophes, which is less wrong – at least it will render properly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: Ah! Did not know that. Changed it. Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

• News and notes: The WMF's age of discontent

• In the media: Impenetrable science; Jimmy Wales back in the UAE

• Arbitration report: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case been decided

• Featured content: Featured menagerie

• Recent research: Teaching Wikipedia, Does advertising the gender gap help or hurt Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: Try-ing to become informed - WikiProject Rugby League

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2015

This Month in GLAM – Volume V, Issue XII, December 2015 Headlines Argentina report: Edit-a-thons and Editing Challenges Basque Country report: Local Library weaves a community at Iurretapedia Bulgaria report: Archives Challenge; 100 ancient coins from Philippopolis Germany report: Wallraf Art and Focus on Zeiss Italy report: Fondazione Giorgio Cini donation and a new education project Macedonia report: Physics experiments in glorious HD! Netherlands report: Donation of videos; about Wikimedia during 3 conferences; image donation from Dutch Parliament; workshop at City Archive Rotterdam Spain report: GLAMing Madrid and Wiki Loves contests Sweden report: Riksutställningar UK report: National Library of Wales; Bodleian Libraries of Oxford Open Access report: Open Access stats; recent uploads Wikipedia Library report: Books & Bytes Wikidata report: Wikidata this month Calendar: January's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 17:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot 12 January 2016

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with… 52 The Song of the Lioness (talk) Add sources 52 The Real News (talk) Add sources 67 Go Now (talk) Add sources 15 Tea Party Nation (talk) Add sources 14 Ebonite International (talk) Add sources 802 Ankara (talk) Add sources 347 Microsoft Studios (talk) Cleanup 463 Highland (talk) Cleanup 11 Fulford School (talk) Cleanup 438 American-led intervention in Iraq (2014–present) (talk) Expand 637 Comparison of web browsers (talk) Expand 226 Blood (video game) (talk) Expand 948 Hip hop (talk) Unencyclopaedic 75 Lip-synching in music (talk) Unencyclopaedic 23 Heavy Weapon (talk) Unencyclopaedic 18 Tiger Tiger (nightclub) (talk) Merge 1,430 AOL (talk) Merge 33 Flame detection (talk) Merge 16 University Hospital of Brooklyn at Long Island College Hospital (talk) Wikify 243 Andrew Bird (talk) Wikify 256 Video game music (talk) Wikify 4 Santa and the Fairy Snow Queen (talk) Orphan 8 SwiftKanban (talk) Orphan 1 Jordan's Meats (talk) Orphan 9 AGA (Singer) (talk) Stub 4 Roger Fry (educationist) (talk) Stub 8 Journal of Ornithology (talk) Stub 5 National Tea Party Federation (talk) Stub 3 Ros Saboeut (talk) Stub 6 Right America: Feeling Wronged – Some Voices from the Campaign Trail (talk) Stub SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Boysetsfire‎

I see you've deprodded this article after finding reliable sources. I must not familiar with what sources are considered reliable in the world of punk music, could you improve the article with those references?--RadioFan (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

@RadioFan: same as any other music, I imagine. It's not one of the genres I spend much time with. The point is, it was easy to find lots of sources through a quick search so shouldn't be deleted. If you are so inclined: feature on MetalHammer, PunkNews interview, several reviews on PunkNews, Allmusic bio, allmusic review, allmusic review, allmusic review, allmusic review, Altpress review, more from alpress under the boysetsfire tag, Drowned In Sound review, Delaware online, Metalinjection review, Billboard bit, New Straits Times review...and this is far from exhaustive. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

The point is, those references are better on the article than your talk page.--RadioFan (talk) 00:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

@RadioFan: But that's not actually the point. You PRODded, saying "No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines", without, it seems, bothering to look for sources yourself (notability being based on the existence of sources and not sources cited, after all). I saw the band name in the list of proposed deletions, thought I recognized the name, and took all of about 2 minutes to search for sources sufficient to see the band is, in fact, notable. Hence deprod. I am not obliged to now rewrite the article, which seems to be your insinuation (and why my tone is a little bit defensive). The article is kind of a stinker, but I don't have time to rework every article I see nominated/proposed for deletion on bogus grounds. If I'm misinterpreting your messages, of course, I apologize. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

All that said, I did copy the sources to the talk page: Talk:Boysetsfire. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Skilful

No worries; we get that kind of edit a lot with "instalment". I wasn't 100% sure myself, but I did check a dictionary before the revert. Magidin (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Cambodian Rocks

I appreciate that this may sound a little trivial, but I have some worries about the non-free content in this article; I've already removed one clearly unwarranted non-free image, but I'm also worried about the following four things:

1. Four separate samples seems somewhat excessive, especially for such a short article.
2. Per WP:SAMPLE, music samples should be no more than 64kbps (which they basically look to be) but they should be no more than 30 secs/10% of the song length, whichever is shorter.
3. Album covers should typically be no more than 300 by 300 px.
4. The two "free" images have some pretty shakey claims. One is claimed to belong to the uploader, which seems unlikely, while the other is claimed to be of unknown provenance, yet questionable claims are made about its publication in the US.

Sorry to be a pain... Crisco 1492 is fairly knowledgeable about this kind of thing; though his focus has been on Indonesia, I believe he has written on Cambodian topics, and may be able to offer some aid when it comes to locating/identifying free content. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

• Can't say I know much about sources for Cambodian works; the only stuff I've done on Cambodia was in collaboration with Khazar2 (who focused exclusively on human rights topics). I agree that we need less non-free media in that article. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:39, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

@J Milburn and Crisco 1492: Thanks for sharing your concerns.

For the images, admittedly I Just looked at what existed in other articles and apparently did not look at the licensing as hard as I should have. So yes File:Rossereysothea.jpg clearly shouldn't have been included. For the album cover, I went ahead and uploaded a smaller version. I'm afraid I don't know anything about the other two. I did look for other images to upload and even emailed a couple researchers to see if they knew of images with compatible licenses or which they would release... no luck so far. That would be Commons rather than fair use, though.

For the samples, yes it looks like I messed up the first one. Must have looked at the wrong track length or something. :/ Regardless, I replaced it with a shorter one. The reason for including the samples is due to so much of the artists' work having being lost, so for some of the tracks this is the one of the only available recordings. The songs are also for four different artists on four quite different tracks. To me, for an album of music with this sort of history, samples from 4 out of 22 tracks doesn't seem excessive to me -- but then, we've established I have some things to learn about non-free media :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:47, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

• Not just the duration, but the number. Four out of twenty-two tracks is quite a bit too much, especially when several of these tracks are given no critical discussion in the article (i.e. falls afoul of our policies) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

• @Crisco 1492: hmm. I was looking at "where only by including such non-free content, can the reader identify an object, style, or behavior, that is a subject of discussion in the article." I.e. the article talks about different styles so I tried to pick four tracks to give a range of styles. But perhaps the intended meaning of that line is based on media use in an article about style. Regarding the number, if specific discussion of each song were in the article, would there still be an issue? Is there a rule of thumb for number of samples? Sorry if I'm being daft. To err on the side of caution for now, I removed the three that are not explicitly mentioned in the article and removed the nonfree tag. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

• Here's a point of comparison: the FA Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band also uses four sound clips. That one section discussing the songs is three times longer than the entire Cambodian Rocks article. "Contextual significance" can be a very difficult bar to cross, and the chance of a clip's use being questioned increases considerably when more than one clip is used. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

• Fair enough. One it is for now :) I'll see about building out that section to see if we can justify one or two more via specific discussion of the songs, but I've pretty well gone through all the sources I can find... Unfortunately the tracks that get specific mention tend to be those that bear a direct likeness to specific Western songs (Gloria (song), Black Magic Woman, Hip-Hug-Her, etc.). I guess it's to be expected that an American release of untitled tracks from the other side of the world would be treated, at least superficially, like a novelty. :/ (just opining on a tangent now) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:35, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

• In the media: War and peace; WMF board changes; Arabic and Hebrew Wikipedias

• Community view: Battle for the soul of the WMF

• Editorial: We need a culture of verification

• In focus: The Crisis at New Montgomery Street

• Op-ed: Transparency

• Traffic report: Pattern recognition: Third annual Traffic Report

• Special report: Wikipedia community celebrates Public Domain Day 2016

• News and notes: Community objections to new Board trustee

• Blog: Inside the game of sports vandalism on Wikipedia

• Featured content: This Week's Featured Content

• Arbitration report: Interview: outgoing and incumbent arbitrators 2016

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

@Guy Macon: Thanks. I didn't see this come up again. Speaking of which...again?? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 6

Newsletter • January 2016

Hello there! Happy to be writing this newsletter once more. This month:

What comes next

Some good news: the Wikimedia Foundation has renewed WikiProject X. This means we can continue focusing on making WikiProjects better.

During our first round of work, we created a prototype WikiProject based on two ideas: (1) WikiProjects should clearly present things for people to do, and (2) The content of WikiProjects should be automated as much as possible. We launched pilots, and for the most part it works. But this approach will not work for the long term. While it makes certain aspects of running a WikiProject easier, it makes the maintenance aspects harder.

We are working on a major overhaul that will address these issues. New features will include:

• Creating WikiProjects by simply filling out a form, choosing which reports you want to generate for your project. This will work with existing bots in addition to the Reports Bot reports. (Of course, you can also have sections curated by humans.)
• One-click button to join a WikiProject, with optional notifications.
• Be able to define your WikiProject's scope within the WikiProject itself by listing relevant pages and categories, eliminating the need to tag every talk page with a banner. (You will still be allowed to do that, of course. It just won't be required.)

The end goal is a collaboration tool that can be used by WikiProjects but also by any edit-a-thon or group of people that want to coordinate on improving articles. Though implemented as an extension, the underlying content will be wikitext, meaning that you can continue to use categories, templates, and other features as you normally would.

This will take a lot of work, and we are just getting started. What would you like to see? I invite you to discuss on our talk page.

Until next time,

Harej (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference at Rhinogradentia

Hi Rhododendrites, I noticed that in your last edit at Rhinogradentia, you added a list-defined reference named "vbio", but didn't associate it with any inline citations in the text, so it's showing up as an error on the page. Was this meant to be associated with specific content on the page, or is it perhaps meant to be a general reference? —Laoris (talk) 17:45, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

@Laoris: Ah. Thanks. I was pulled away from working on it the other day and forgot to go back. Commented out for now. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge Where?

In regards to the article described as "social justice warrior" I believe that it would go just fine under the criticism section of the "social justice" article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowflakemango (talk • contribs) 22:31, 23 January 2016‎

Thanks for clarifying, but I'm confused. Did you post the comment by anonymous user 108.2.58.56 at the deletion discussion? I presume you're responding to my question posed to that person? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

The social justice warrior article

Hello, you might remember me from talk page of Moral panic and Social Justice and from the ANI where I was put up for hounding. I've now noticed they've placed the term social justice warrior in its own article since it was creating so much chism in social justice.

I looked at the Social Justice Warrior article and it seems like a battleground, full of bully tactics. I don't want to partake and be hounded, but I noticed someone removed four links from Further Reading which weren't duplicates even though that was the edit reason. I don't know any of the other people and I assume they're not monitoring your busy talk page, so could I ask for you, the brazen golem of impartiality, to look into the four links, please? --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 16:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Oh and at some point someone removed this book reference which probably belongs in Further Reading more as it's a book: --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 16:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

References

@Mr. Magoo and McBarker: Could you link to the removals you're talking about? There's been a lot of activity there. On the talk page there are discussions of a couple sources -- are those what you mean? If you're talking about Urban Dictionary, I'm going to completely endorse its removal per WP:ELNO, but other than that I'm not sure. There are some sources that have been repeatedly added, removed, moved, etc. based on the context of their use and disputes over reliability, and I'm not inclined to jump in without the benefit of having followed those discussions. Honestly, I don't relish the opportunity to jump in there at all. The reality of it is I tend to get frustrated by Gamergate-related articles because (even compared to some of the other contentious areas I work in) I feel like both sides of GG disputes operate with a battleground mentality in a total WP:AGF vacuum, which makes it really hard to do anything at all without spending a ton of time to make a little bit of progress.

Regarding the book (I typed the above before I noticed your second message), while it's obviously relevant, it looks like it's self-published. My own take on a book like this is that it may be worth including in further reading if you know it to be high quality, but unless there's a compelling reason to do so and/or unless it has received some legitimacy via, say, a review in the New York Review of Books or something, it probably shouldn't be included in an article about a contentious subject and, realistically, if someone challenges it it should probably be removed from any article. A self-published book might as well be a very long blog until it receives some outside validation. I may have missed something, but that's what I'm seeing based on my 2 minutes of research :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

No, I don't know about the Urban one: at the bottom here. I also don't really understand this "Gamergate". --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 16:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

@Mr. Magoo and McBarker: Ah. Well, there's a ton of gray area here but I'll give you the strict policy rationale. Further reading should still conform to WP:RS and should be general resources to learn more about a subject. The NY Post and Crimson articles are explicitly in the papers' respective "opinion" sections. Opinion pieces are typically only considered reliable for the opinions of their authors. So if an author's opinion is significant, it might be appropriate to add to the article, but it's unlikely to be included as further reading or an external link because it's not a general source of information about the subject -- just about the author's opinions about the subject. The Daily Caller and National Review are treated similarly, as publications for which there is a well-documented political bias. It doesn't mean they can never be used, but especially in contentious political issues (or social issues that have a political bent), they're again just typically reliable for the authors' opinions. The gray area for using them comes down to whether the author's opinions should be included in the article per WP:WEIGHT and a more detailed analysis of the extent to which each is reliable. In short, by the strictest policy definition, they are right to be removed unless compelling reasons for their inclusion can be presented. For more information about Gamergate, see Gamergate controversy, but abandon hope all ye who enter there. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

By the way, I appreciate your "brazen golem of impartiality", whether or not it was intended as a compliment :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

• News and notes: Vote of no confidence; WMF trustee speaks out

• Op-ed: Not a pretty picture: Thoughts on the "monkey selfie" debacle

• In the media: 15th anniversary news round-up

• Traffic report: Danse Macabre

• Featured content: This week's featured content

• Blog: Fifteen years ago, Wikipedia was a very different place

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot 26 January 2015

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with… 20,770 Facebook (talk) Add sources 226 Disney Springs (talk) Add sources 396 AM broadcasting (talk) Add sources 149 Comparison of streaming media systems (talk) Add sources 532 Anarcho-capitalism (talk) Add sources 2,369 Television (talk) Add sources 764 Wireless (talk) Cleanup 43 Arcadia High School (California) (talk) Cleanup 700 Gävle goat (talk) Cleanup 5 Southwick Priory (talk) Expand 3,624 Istanbul (talk) Expand 36 Pierre Hadot (talk) Expand 42 Moga, Punjab (talk) Unencyclopaedic 52 Cam (bootleg) (talk) Unencyclopaedic 160 Cantopop (talk) Unencyclopaedic 463 Harvard Business School (talk) Merge 93 Good Sam Enterprises (talk) Merge 273 Sirius Satellite Radio (talk) Merge 69 U.S. news media and the Vietnam War (talk) Wikify 313 ID3 (talk) Wikify 166 Radio station (talk) Wikify 8 18th-century American piracy of British literature (talk) Orphan 3 Sylvia Hahn (talk) Orphan 3 Michele Raffin (talk) Orphan 448 Cloud rap (talk) Stub 659 Pejorative (talk) Stub 13 Telecine (copying) (talk) Stub 4 Vichara Dany (talk) Stub 8 Reflectance difference spectroscopy (talk) Stub 6 Gaioz Nigalidze (talk) Stub SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

• Op-ed: Lila Tretikov: the WMF needs your input in developing our strategy

• News and notes: Geshuri steps down from the Board

• In the media: Media coverage of the Arnnon Geshuri no-confidence vote

• Recent research: Bursty edits; how politics beat religion but then lost to sports; notability as a glass ceiling

• Traffic report: Death and taxes

• Featured content: This week's featured content

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Paul Smith

Hope you don't mind that I overwrote your link. I'd see the same story, but it's a pet peeve of mine when sites recycle material from original sources for their own clicks; I make an effort to find the original creator of the content and give them the clicks (you'll notice that I failed on my first attempt, then finally tracked down the Youtube account of the news anchor). Cheers, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: Not at all. Thanks for doing so. I just happened across the story and quickly added it without making sure it originated with that site (I should've known better, since I'd never seen "Hefty" before). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Rhododendrites. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Matthew Christopher

Hi

Thanks for your input.

I am not Matthew Christopher. I am his social media director. I am in the process of adding sources as I clearly mentioned in my edits.

Matthew Christopher is a notable designer in the same arena as Monique Lhuillier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monique_Lhuillier and I followed her format.

Please advise on the conflict of interest. I understand adding sources.

Thanks muchMatthewchristopher (talk) 06:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

@Matthewchristopher: I did see that in this edit you said you were "setting up sources", which I took to mean the social media links you added and the list of where his gowns were featured, which don't sound like they would verify other information beyond the existence of his work in those publications. If I caught you while you were in the middle of adding something else, I apologize. In general, though, there's a higher bar for citing sources when it comes to biographies of living persons and the edits looked promotional. Not egregiously so, to be sure, but they add accomplishments and additional details without including sources and add an array of social media links. And, of course, your username is kind of a red flag. I do recognize there's some irony in reverting your changes partially on the basis of sourcing when the article is littered with "citation needed" sorts of tags, though.

If you would like to learn more about Wikipedia's policies regarding paid editing and conflict of interest: WP:PAIDEDIT is about the part of the terms of use that requires disclosure of paid contributions, WP:COI is the full conflict of interest policy (helpful, but lengthy), and WP:PROMO is about promotion on Wikipedia (part of the "What Wikipedia is not" policy). The most useful for you, however, would be the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and how to make a simple COI request.

That last link is the most practical for what we're talking about. The idea is that you use the article talk page to propose changes to the article and use a little template, {{Edit request}} which draws the attention of users who might not otherwise see it. Someone else will come in and implement the change, revise the edits and implement, or provide feedback as to any problems that exist in the proposed text. It's an extra step, but does more to ensure what you want to change does change, and changes in a way agreeable with Wikipedia policies.

By the way, I know that Matthew Christopher is a notable designer. When the article was nominated for deletion last year, I worked to keep it because my own research showed that he is notable. That said, I don't have any particular interest in bridal fashion, and while I found some sources for the purpose of keeping the article I never did use them to improve it. If you click that "nominated for deletion" link, you'll find some links there that you could draw from (although, as you're handling his social media, I imagine you have all of those and more). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Matthew Christopher Changes

Hi Rhododendrites

I made many updates to this page following your recommendations and advice. Thanks. There is a tag on the wiki page -A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject

This might be based on the picture I uploaded. The picture is Matthew's official head shot. His husband, David J. Marchi is an artist/photographer and takes many of Matthew's business pictures. Here is an example of it's use. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=matthew+christopher+fashion+designerMatthewchristopher (talk) 06:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

@Matthewchristopher: I don't think it's because of the image; I think it's strictly because of your username. I don't have any major problems with the content, though, and it looks like Grayfell (an experienced editor) looked it over and made some tweaks, so while I still think it's better to use the talk page (and nobody could justify adding that COI tag in that case) but what you've added looks fine based on a quick look (I haven't actually followed any of the citations). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

How do we remove the conflict comment on Matthew Christopher's page

Hi Rhododendrites...

Getting close I think

Would you please help me remove the conflict comment on Matthew Christopher's page?

Appreciate your help here.

Vermontmountainboy (talk) 01:33, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I am having trouble finding out where to respond to Greyfell and his COI comment and the removal of the picture.

I was specifically asked by Wiki to change my username Matthew Christopher. I did this today and it was approved yet I am still getting comments like Greyfell is leaving.

Also, the picture I posted on behalf of Matthew Christopher Inc. is wholly owned by Matthew Christopher Inc. What do I need to provide as proof of this?

Thanks much

(Vermontmountainboy (talk) 03:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC))

@Vermontmountainboy: It looks like the tag is gone from the article, but there's not a way to remove it from the talk page because, well, you have a COI and you edited the article. I'd recommend leaving a message for Grayfell to follow up on that (and regarding the image). For the latter, you could also check out commons:Help:Contents. Media on Wikipedia fall into three categories: copyrighted content improperly used (should be removed/deleted), copyrighted material used with a fair use rationale, or content with a compatible open license. For the latter, uploads should be done at Wikimedia Commons. There are processes you'll have to go through to show that you're the copyright holder or that you have the copyright holder's permission to release with an open license. I'm not really the best person to help with that, but the Commons page on "email templates" explains how to do this via email. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, honestly, you are one of the best editors I have worked on at wiki and I appreciate the guidance. I will get proper documentation for picture.

The only other thing I want to discuss is the recent edits. I literally looked at the format of one of Matthew's competitors, Monique Lhuillier and her wiki page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monique_Lhuillier

Since her page has been up for quite a long time, I used it a guide and structured the language almost word for word.

Not that I want to call anyone out but all Matthew's content, subjects, statements about his flagship store are no different than how she was written up.

Thanks for looking into this.

(Vermontmountainboy (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC))

Saturday February 6 in NYC: Black Life Matters Editathon

Saturday February 6 in NYC: Black Life Matters Editathon

You are invited to join us and the AfroCROWD initiative at New York Public Library's Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture for our upcoming editathon, a part of the Black WikiHistory Month campaign. Saturday February 6 Black Life Matters Editathon (RSVP). 12:00pm - 5:00 pm at NYPL Schomburg Center, 515 Malcolm X Boulevard (Lenox Avenue), by W 135th St The Wikipedia training and editathon will take place in the Aaron Douglas Reading Room of the Jean Blackwell Hutson Research and Reference Division, with a reception following in the Langston Hughes lobby on the first floor of the building at 5:00pm. We hope to see you there!--Pharos (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC) (Bonus upcoming event: WikiWednesday Salon @ Babycastles - Wednesday, February 17)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Thank you for supporting my RfA

	Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks so much Ryan! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your tireless work on a range of issues, but more importantly Destruction of ivory, a long overdue article (took a look at Ivory and Ivory trade, and was very much discouraged by the lack of covering this strategy). Keep up the amazing work, Sadads (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

@Sadads: Thanks! :) I was surprised by the lack of coverage on Wikipedia, too -- especially given the extensive press attention every one of the events attracts. I hope to go back to Ivory trade at some point to better include it there. BTW have you ever taken a look at the US Fish and Wildlife Service Flickr stream. I was peripherally aware of it before but never really took a look. I grabbed some of their images of the NY ivory crush and wound up grabbing about a hundred others :) Now to categorize.... — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Haha, thats great! We always need to be scraping amazing content from PD-US-GOV sources. I worked for the Army Center of Military History for a summer and did a lot of scraping both text and images. Sadads (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Chess.com revert

Hi, why did you place back an unrelated external link to the article? IQ125 (talk) 18:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

@IQ125: Why do you say it's unrelated? There's a section heading in the article about Chesskid.com which explains that it's part of chess.com. Chesskid.com also redirects to chess.com. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

I agree with you, thanks for the clarification. IQ125 (talk) 13:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA

	Brianhe RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating at my RfA. Your support was very much appreciated even if I did get a bit scorched. Brianhe (talk) 07:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot 9 February 2016

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with… 43 Wildlife smuggling (talk) Add sources 829 Taiping Rebellion (talk) Add sources 137 Least-concern species (talk) Add sources 65 Wildlife trade (talk) Add sources 120 Environmental issues in Thailand (talk) Add sources 2 Jesse's Journey (talk) Add sources 64 Misinformation (talk) Cleanup 131 We Are the In Crowd (talk) Cleanup 39 The Good Witch of the West (talk) Cleanup 56 Shukufuku no Campanella (talk) Expand 109 Senran Kagura Shinovi Versus (talk) Expand 10 China–Tanzania relations (talk) Expand 373 Christine Jorgensen (talk) Unencyclopaedic 12 Show cat (talk) Unencyclopaedic 247 Cat behavior (talk) Unencyclopaedic 1,683 Open source (talk) Merge 1,486 Xiaomi (talk) Merge 41 Irregular chess opening (talk) Merge 30 International Fund for Animal Welfare (talk) Wikify 502 Swing music (talk) Wikify 89 Bear hunting (talk) Wikify 4 Ben & Florentine (talk) Orphan 0 User revolt (talk) Orphan 2 The Iraq War: A Historiography of Wikipedia Changelogs (talk) Orphan 4 International Braille Chess Association (talk) Stub 8 Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge (talk) Stub 4 Burt Hochberg (talk) Stub 5 Union Label Group (talk) Stub 17 Rae Hendrie (talk) Stub 3 Bill Goichberg (talk) Stub SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

• From the editors: Help wanted

• Special report: Board chair and new trustee speak with the Signpost

• In focus: The Knight Foundation grant: a timeline and an email to the board

• Op-ed: So, what’s a knowledge engine anyway?

• News and notes: Harassment survey 2015; Luis Villa to leave WMF; knowledge engine background

• Arbitration report: Catching up on arbitration

• Traffic report: Bowled

• Featured content: This week's featured content

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

So for this edit, did you have to resist the urge to make the edit summary "Added Typo"? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

@Howicus: No, but I did think about adding it as Tpyo first. Thanks :) — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Rhododendrites, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 14:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Feb 16: Art+Feminism Training / Photo-Poetics @ Guggenheim
Feb 17: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

Tuesday February 16, 5:30pm: Art+Feminism Training / Photo-Poetics @ Guggenheim
You are invited to join us for an evening of social Wikipedia training and editing at the Guggenheim, with a workshop given by the Art+Feminism project to prepare for next month's major campaign, and a tour and edit-a-thon of Photo-Poetics: An Anthology. Tuesday, February 16 Art+Feminism Training / Photo-Poetics @ Guggenheim (RSVP at Eventbrite - Participants have to bring their own laptops and power cords). 5:30pm - 8:30pm at Sackler Center Media Lab, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, 1071 Fifth Avenue; enter through 89th Street staff entrance
Wednesday February 17, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our evening "WikiWednesday" salon and knowledge-sharing workshop by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. This month, we will also host a Newcomer's Wiki Workshop for those getting started on the encyclopedia project! We will also include a look at our annual plan and budget ideas, and welcome input from community members on the sorts of projects the chapter should support through both volunteer and budgetary efforts. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities. After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery! Wednesday December 17 WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (RSVP on-wiki or at meetup.com). 7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles gallery, 137 West 14th Street We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! (One talk this month will be on use of Wikipedia press passes for photographers.) Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 00:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

This Month in GLAM: January 2016

This Month in GLAM – Volume VI, Issue I, January 2016 Headlines Africa report: #OpenAfrica15 Argentina report: New Editing Challenges and Design the guidelines for cultural institutions Australia and New Zealand report: WiR at State Library of Queensland Belgium report: Heroines Wikipedia workshop addressing the Gender Bias; Public Domain Day Celebration; Wikidata meeting & workshop; FOSDEM: MediaWiki, Wikidata and more France report: New year, new start Germany report: GLAM on Tour at Technische Sammlungen & Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Italy report: BEIC Library Project goes on, and Wikipedia for Press and Media Freedom in Europe Macedonia report: Wikipedia 15 Netherlands report: Wiki loves artists - We need your help; Two Wikipedia edit-a-thons Spain report: GLAMing Madrid, Wiki Loves Folk & Gobernantes de Chile Sweden report: New year, new projects UK report: Audio-describing London Landmarks, celebrating Wikipedia 15 Special story: Pre-production starts for Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons tutorial videos Open Access report: Open Access stats; data citation, dino jaw, dozens of beetles Wikidata report: Wikidata this month Calendar: February's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 08:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

• Special report: New internal documents raise questions about the origins of the Knowledge Engine

• In focus: An in-depth look at the special report's newly revealed documents

• News and notes: Another WMF departure

• In the media: Jeb Bush swings at Wikipedia and connects

• Featured content: This week's featured content

• Traffic report: A river of revilement

• Blog: Wikimedia Foundation removes The Diary of Anne Frank due to copyright law requirements

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Pocket FM

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 15

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

• New donations - Ships, medical resources, plus Arabic and Farsi resources
• #1lib1ref campaign summary and highlights
• New branches and coordinators

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

• Special report: Search and destroy: the Knowledge Engine and the undoing of Lila Tretikov

• Op-ed: Shit I cannot believe we had to fucking write this month

• Featured content: This week's featured content

• Traffic report: Super Bowling

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Blog: Antonin Scalia and the editor tracking his legacy

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot 23 February 2016

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with… Thailand (talk) Add sources Alexander Alekhine (talk) Add sources Philippines (talk) Add sources Hedonic treadmill (talk) Add sources Ursodeoxycholic acid (talk) Add sources Hunting (talk) Add sources Domestic rabbit (talk) Cleanup Iraq War (talk) Cleanup Race (biology) (talk) Cleanup Social forum (talk) Expand Twitter (talk) Expand Providence Public School District (talk) Expand Video game localization (talk) Unencyclopaedic Kenya (talk) Unencyclopaedic Bangladeshi hip hop (talk) Unencyclopaedic September 11 attacks (talk) Merge Celtic harp (talk) Merge Lingual papilla (talk) Merge Gender role (talk) Wikify Levee (talk) Wikify King of Kings: The Early Years (talk) Wikify Marek Obrtel (talk) Orphan Hykiem Coney (talk) Orphan Antoine Richardson (talk) Orphan Actionspace (talk) Stub Tusk (talk) Stub Mountain buzzard (talk) Stub Long-legged buzzard (talk) Stub Biological specificity (talk) Stub Horror punk (talk) Stub SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 7

Newsletter • February 2016

This month:

One database for Wikipedia requests

Development of the extension for setting up WikiProjects, as described in the last issue of this newsletter, is currently underway. No terribly exciting news on this front.

In the meantime, we are working on a prototype for a new service we hope to announce soon. The problem: there are requests scattered all across Wikipedia, including requests for new articles and requests for improvements to existing articles. We Wikipedians are very good at coming up with lists of things to do. But once we write these lists, where do they end up? How can we make them useful for all editors—even those who do not browse the missing articles lists, or the particular WikiProjects that have lists?

Introducing Wikipedia Requests, a new tool to centralize the various lists of requests around Wikipedia. Requests will be tagged by category and WikiProject, making it easier to find requests based on what your interests are. Accompanying this service will be a bot that will let you generate reports from this database on any wiki page, including WikiProjects. This means that once a request is filed centrally, it can syndicated all throughout Wikipedia, and once it is fulfilled, it will be marked as "complete" throughout Wikipedia. The idea for this service came about when I saw that it was easy to put together to-do lists based on database queries, but it was harder to do this for human-generated requests when those requests are scattered throughout the wiki, siloed throughout several pages. This should especially be useful for WikiProjects that have overlapping interests.

The newsletter this month is fairly brief; not a lot of news, just checking in to say that we are hard at work and hope to have more for you soon.

Until next time,

Harej (talk) 01:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

• Special report: WMF in limbo as decision on Tretikov nears

• Op-ed: Backward the Foundation

• Traffic report: Of Dead Pools and Dead Judges

• Blog: Wiki Loves Africa brings the continent’s fashion to the world

• Arbitration report: Arbitration motion regarding CheckUser & Oversight inactivity

• Featured content: This week's featured content

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #1—2016

VE News 25 February 2016

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter Did you know? Among experienced editors, the visual editor's table editing is one of the most popular features. If you select the top of a column or the end of a row, you can quickly insert and remove columns and rows. Now, you can also rearrange columns and rows. Click "Move before" or "Move after" to swap the column or row with its neighbor. You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor. Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Indic, and Han scripts, and improving the single edit tab interface. Recent changes You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing. This function is available to nearly all editors at most wikis except the Wiktionaries and Wikisources. Many local feedback pages for the visual editor have been redirected to mw:VisualEditor/Feedback. You can now re-arrange columns and rows in tables, as well as copying a row, column or any other selection of cells and pasting it in a new location. The formula editor has two options: you can choose "Quick edit" to see and change only the LaTeX code, or "Edit" to use the full tool. The full tool offers immediate preview and an extensive list of symbols. Future changes The single edit tab project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab. This is similar to the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as an account preference for logged-in editors, and as a cookie for logged-out users. Logged-in editors will have these options in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences: Remember my last editor, Always give me the visual editor if possible, Always give me the source editor, and Show me both editor tabs.  (This is the state for people using the visual editor now.) The visual editor uses the same search engine as Special:Search to find links and files. This search will get better at detecting typos and spelling mistakes soon. These improvements to search will appear in the visual editor as well. The visual editor will be offered to all editors at most "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers would like to know how well the visual editor works in your language. They particularly want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect the following languages: Japanese, Korean, Urdu, Persian, Arabic, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Hindi, Bengali, Assamese, Thai, Aramaic and others. Let's work together Please try out the newest version of the single edit tab on test2.wikipedia.org. You may need to restore the default preferences (at the bottom of test2wiki:Special:Preferences) to see the initial prompt for options. Were you able to find a preference setting that will work for your own editing? Did you see the large preferences dialog box when you started editing an article there? Can you read and type in Korean, Arabic, Japanese, Indic, or Han scripts? Language engineer David Chan needs help from people who often type in these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help. Report your results on wiki (Korean – Japanese – all languages). Learn how to improve the "automagical" citoid referencing system in the visual editor, by creating Zotero translators for popular sources in your language! Join the Tech Talk about "Automated citations in Wikipedia: Citoid and the technology behind it" with Sebastian Karcher on 29 February 2016. If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thanks! – Whatamidoing (WMF) 17:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Notorious Salon.com insane asylum

I was just trying to correct an inaccuracy of the article. If you are not convinced, here it is from the horse's mouth: https://twitter.com/Salon . Here is but one example: "White men must be stopped: The very future of mankind depends on it" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.26.205.212 (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)