User talk:Reesorville

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Reesorville, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SriMesh | talk 03:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A8 UDI 20:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Militant atheism

I have added a link to the militant atheism and Soviet related articles and was wondering if you could look at the Militant atheism article to provide more sources and data. ThanksLoveMonkey (talk) 14:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to see what I can do about writing up an article on philosophical Marxist-Leninist atheism and I'll attach a link to that article. It's absurd what you encountered in those comments around that article. I don't mean to be disrespectful to the people you talked with, but it doesn't seem like they understand Soviet history; 'militant atheists' was what they called themselves. God Bless,Reesorville (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the article I mentioned and attached it to that page. God Bless, Reesorville (talk) 00:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the detailed articles

--As someone with some experience here, and interested in the increase of Wikipedia coverage on religion generally, let me advise you would defending them in their current form. To give them any chance at all, it is necessary to first find other sources--they exist.; you must then also greatly decrease the sections on the persecution of non-notable individuals; I may soon illustrate what I mean by some of the necessary edits. DGG ( talk ) 00:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DGG, I'm not sure what you mean by 'let me advise you would defending them in their current form', but you are quite correct that there are other sources and I have begun to start adding some, although I can't do this quickly. If you have other sources please feel free to add them, and if you think that there are irrelevant information there, please feel free to change it. God Bless,Reesorville (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commendation

Just came across the Persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union and see you have been most instrumental in making this the substantial informative page that it is. Are you aware of the book, "The Betrayal of the Church, 1986 by Edmund W. Robb and Julia Robb? Or The Persecutor by Sergei Kourdakov Daniel1212 (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your commendation. I am not familiar with either title. Most of my info comes from online articles in academic journals and from Pospielovsky's books; I have read sections of other titles, but not those two titles. God Bless,Reesorville (talk) 08:12, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYK

Some of your new articles, like Poland Anti-Religious Campaign (1945–1990), may be eligible for WP:DYK and front page exposure. Please consider nominating your creations at T:TDYK. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the article as you suggested, although I'm not sure if I've done it right. I am still in the process of adding things to it, and I'm not sure when I'll be done. Thank you very much for your suggestion, however. God Bless,Reesorville (talk) 23:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations of new articles will have to be done within 5 days of their creation, so this one is way too old, unfortunately. Have a read of the rules. And if you are new to DYK, then it's best to use the detailed nomination guide to get things right with the nomination process. Schwede 66 02:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[1]. Biophys (talk) 20:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyprian Michael Iwene Tansi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yam and Igbo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blessed Cyprian Tansi

Hello, Reesorville. Could you add page numbers to the references you added to Blessed Cyprian's article? You've done a ton of good work there! Thanks. --71.178.50.222 (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Majolus of Cluny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Odilo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indigenous peoples of the Americas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montezuma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chronological list of Old Testament Saints, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tekoa and Enoch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regicide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Probus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saints and Animal/Plant Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durrow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gloria.tv

The article Gloria.tv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gloria.tv for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gloria.tv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloria.tv until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:10, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of excommunicable offences in the Catholic Church for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of excommunicable offences in the Catholic Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of excommunicable offences in the Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elizium23 (talk) 21:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Reesorville. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Reesorville. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christianity and Racism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christianity and Racism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity and Racism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:29, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Soteris) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Soteris, Reesorville!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

If you look at the history of the article and examine my edit, you will see how you can better format your references next time!

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Reesorville. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New volume on Soviet persecution of religion

I've noticed you've done a lot of work on Wiki on the history of the Soviet persecution of religion. The article on the campaign of 1958-1964 fairly criticizes the reliance on one source, but since then, another major volume on the history of Soviet atheism was just published and I thought it would be of interest to you: Victoria Smolkin's A Sacred Space is Never Empty: A History of Soviet Atheism (Princeton University Press 2018).

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited March 13, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quo Graviora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chronological list of Old Testament Saints for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chronological list of Old Testament Saints is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronological list of Old Testament Saints until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bai Xiaoman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bai Xiaoman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bai Xiaoman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 19:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soteris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soteris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soteris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 19:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roman Plague of 590 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Plague of 590 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Plague of 590 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 19:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vacis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vacis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vacis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 19:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		To both you and NightHeron, for your exemplary collaboration at Christianity and abortion despite differences of perspective. Generalrelative (talk) 01:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Surprise Attack - Tunnel Warfare moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Surprise Attack - Tunnel Warfare, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 21:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surprise Attack - Tunnel Warfare (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A Reception section with reviews in respected, widely-read publications is the best way to show notability of a film. The plot is too long - should be under 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT - and there needs to be real-life contextual information (like the context of the production of the movie).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Surprise Attack - Tunnel Warfare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Surprise Attack - Tunnel Warfare, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reesorville! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 20:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China-Solomon Islands relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Ming.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of China-Solomon Islands relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article China-Solomon Islands relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China-Solomon Islands relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Gjs238 (talk) 03:25, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Anti-Abortion by Country (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Anti-Abortion instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Reesorville/sandbox/Anti-Abortion by Country and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please look at the talk page for 'anti-abortion movements' in mainspace. I already attempted to put some of this material on that page, but the consensus that was reached was that unless RS calls it a 'movement', it cannot be included there. According to the consensus, there is no page in mainspace that deals with anti-abortion generally. Hence, this article is not a duplicate Reesorville (talk) 19:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anti-abortion by country has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anti-abortion by country. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anti-abortion by country has been accepted

Anti-abortion by country, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Slywriter (talk) 02:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Libs of TikTok. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 14:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The other issue is that WP:FOXNEWS and the National Catholic Register are not WP:RSes for this content. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 14:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a box on the talk page of the article, you can defend your position there. Reesorville (talk) 14:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please please learn to use citation templates!

It saves everyone else a lot of headaches, and keeps the citations verifiable even after link rot. It is also required if any bot will ever help archive your citations, fix errors in them, etc. They need to be in citation templates.

Here are some tools that may help you: Help:Citation tools. I prefer ProveIt and RefToolbar. But there are tons of great options! — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 16:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zhongyuan bank moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zhongyuan bank, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhongyuan Bank has been accepted

Zhongyuan Bank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:55, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zhongyuan Bank

Hello, Reesorville,

Thank you for creating Zhongyuan Bank.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello. I have accepted your draft, and added the tags for more citations needed and lead too short. However, it is in the mainspace, and you can find it at Zhongyuan Bank!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|EchidnaLives}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:57, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Administrative Regulations for Internet Religious Information (PRC)

Hello, Reesorville. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Administrative Regulations for Internet Religious Information (PRC), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 580 Dysentery Epidemic in Gaul

The article 580 Dysentery Epidemic in Gaul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable in any of the searches

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrBauer24 (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm ItsCheck. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of epidemics and pandemics without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ItsCheck (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know how I managed to delete the content. I was trying to add another plague just above it and must have accidentally deleted the one below in the process of editing. Reesorville (talk) 23:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at List of epidemics and pandemics, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ItsCheck (talk) 02:10, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Administrative Regulations for Internet Religious Information (PRC)

Hello, Reesorville. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Administrative Regulations for Internet Religious Information".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was already posted on wikisource. I didn't publish it to wikipedia. Reesorville (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Forwarding a message that came to me incorrectly

Hi Kaihsu. Thank you for your work on Augustine Zhao Rong. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks very much for this article - could you tell me whether you translated it from another Wikipedia?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ingratis (talk) 16:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingratis: Please contact @Reesorville instead. Kaihsu (talk) 08:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not translated from another Wikipedia page. Reesorville (talk) 18:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]