User talk:Penale52/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Penale52! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaffer (baseball)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shaffer (baseball) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Shaffer (baseball)

Hi Penale52, you recently removed a deletion tag from Shaffer (baseball). Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:09, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Edwards (baseball)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edwards (baseball) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

baseball players

Baseball players who played in only one game are not notable. They are so not notable you dont even have a first name for them. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

That is no true. It has been discussed many times that playing in at least one Major League Baseball game pass WP:BASE/N. This is shown in Part 3 of the baseball notability guidelines which I'm sure you did not read: Have appeared in at least one game in any of the following defunct leagues: All-American Girls Professional Baseball League, American Association, Cuban League, Federal League, Japanese Baseball League, National Association of Professional Base Ball Players, Negro Major Leagues, Players' League, Union Association. Both Shafer and Edwards played in one game for the Brooklyn Eckfords of the National Association of Professional Base Ball Players in 1875. Adam Penale (talk) 21:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Jeff Shaver

Hello, Penale52, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Shaver whether the article Jeff Shaver should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Jeff Shaver, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Pilif12p 05:52, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Penale52. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Carl Sixsmith (talk) 18:29, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Art Williams (umpire)

Hello, Penale52, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Art Williams (umpire), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! —Bagumba (talk) 23:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

My bad, I misread the entry for minor league umps at WP:BASE/N.—Bagumba (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey

I just want to thank you for the amazing job you've done on tracking down all those photos of 19th-century baseball players. DS (talk) 13:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks alot. Adam Penale (talk) 14:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Doc Adams image

Hi Penale. I noticed that you added an image of Doc Adams in this edit. While it's a good-quality image, the licensing is a bit shaky, which I know since I investigated File:New_York_Knickerbockers_Baseball_Club,_circa_1847.jpg, the image that it's based off of. The problem is that it was certainly created before 1923, but I haven't been able to find proof that it was published in a book/magazine/newspaper before that date, which is necessary for public domain status. For now, I took the image out since it wouldn't stand up to close scrutiny at the major content review processes. Would you happen to know of an old (pre-1923) publication where the main photo appeared? I'd love to see it be proven PD, and would be the first one to put the new image back in the infobox if that happened. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

No, I don't know of any old publications that it appears in. I have no problem with you removing the image. I would like to applaud you on the work you've done to this page. I always wondered why Adams never had an article, until you made it. Adam Penale (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your praise and understanding. I asked about the photo at the baseball WikiProject; hopefully someone there can provide the needed information. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Lou Lombardo

Hi. I put on note on the Lou Lombardo talk page about renaming that article, since there's another Lou Lombardo who'll have an article shortly. Probably best if you respond there. If you don't object to the change, I'll handle it when I post the new article about the film editor. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 17:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Pedro Dibut nominated for "Did you know...?

I've expanded the article, Pedro Dibut, which you created a few days ago, and have nominated for "Did you know...?" for Wikipedia's front page. The nomination appears at Template:Did you know nominations/Pedro Dibut. BRMo (talk) 05:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Frank Penale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Penale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Penale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications

Hey Penale. Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swallingwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 19:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Pedro Dibut

Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

biography priority

FYI... The WikiProject Biography banner hasn't included the "priority" parameter for a few years. It has been replaced by sports-priority, politician-priority, musician-priority, etc. Bgwhite (talk) 08:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

WCNBL

Hello, Penale52! I started a discussion at Template talk:Negro League teams#Major/minor league & scope of template regarding the above. Dropping a note here as a courtesy, there is no rush. Rgrds, (Dynamic IP, will change when I log off.) --64.85.220.22 (talk) 22:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Josiah Henson (wrestler)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Josiah Henson (wrestler) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WWGB (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

An invitation for you!

	Hello, Penale52/Archive 4. We are pleased to invite you to join WikiProject Baseball's Umpires task force, a group dedicated to improving articles related to baseball umpires. If you're interested in participating, please add your name to the list of members on the task force page.

This task force is still in a developmental stage and your assistance would be appreciated. Happy editing! AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 17:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for joining! AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Bull Perrine

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Portland Roses for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Portland Roses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portland Roses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jsayre64 (talk) 16:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kyler Newby

The article Kyler Newby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Not worth merging to any other page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Ron Fowler DYK

Hi. I've nominated Ron Fowler, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. —Bagumba (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ron Fowler

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

PRODs

All of those articles you just PROD'd had already been PROD'd. Kinston Eagle removed the PROD notice. They can't be deleted through PROD, but need to be taken to AfD. Preferably we can pace the nominations so it's not all at once. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Dave Holt Baseball Player

Hi Penale52, I was checking to see if it possible to have my page reinstated? Is there anything I can do? It seems there is some grey area and I might be reconsidered. Thank you, Dave Holt Baseball Player — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.223.98 (talk) 02:43, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Veljko Čubrilović.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Veljko Čubrilović.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:25, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Omar Poveda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omar Poveda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Poveda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spanneraol (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wade Rowdon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wade Rowdon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bojo1498 (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Smith (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smith (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smith (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest 2 talk 01:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Le Roy Williams

Hello, Penale52, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Le Roy Williams, appears to be directly copied from http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=7720804. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Le Roy Williams if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 14:50, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TallahasseeThunder4.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TallahasseeThunder4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm MirrorFreak. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Alex Rodriguez without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mirror Freak 21:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Armando Camacaro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armando Camacaro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armando Camacaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 21:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phillip Riley

The article Phillip Riley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Bill Duplissea (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Duplissea (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Duplissea (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 03:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Armando Camacaro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armando Camacaro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armando Camacaro (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:35, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Cuban League palyers

Hello, Penale52! I'm the dynamic IP that putters around the Negro league articles, and I've been tinkering with some Cuban League articles recently. Since you seem to be the primary author of most of the Cuban player articles, I wanted to point out I started List of Cuban League baseball players last month and thought you might be interested in helping keep it current when you add new articles. Happy editing! Rgrds. --64.85.217.231 (talk) 07:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of members of the Baseball Hall of Fame may have broken the syntax by modifying 8 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about that

at Ernie Harwell. I just saw a large chunk of text removed with no edit summary (I am a big fan of edit summaries) so I put it back. Yes, it does look like perhaps his 8 year old great great grandson did that edit. This is a reminder that I need to add the pictures I took of Ernie at his last game in Tiger Stadium - later. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

No malicious intent. Just what is best for wikipedia. I appreciate your edit, it is just that my lifestyle, these days largely taking care of me 93 year old mother, means that things happen pretty fast, i need to make decisions pretty fast and I made the wrong choice on your edit. Mostly I think I make good decisions but "mostly" is not the same as "always.' Life is supposed to be interesting. Carptrash (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Barry Bowden listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Barry Bowden. Since you had some involvement with the Barry Bowden redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of William Buck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Buck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Buck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Penale52. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy birthday!

Hey, Penale52. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 19:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Warm regards, Mz7 (talk) 06:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

CoffeeSweet 21:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

On this day, 9 years ago...

Hey, Penale52. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Penale52. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

10 years of editing, today.

Hey, Penale52. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 19:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Penale52/Archive 4,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 19:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Penale52. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Trying to learn here, please

Hi: I am like the proverbial ping pong ball & don’t know what I’m allowed to do. So I will only add SABR to the baseball external links, unless you want me to fix the VPBL (which I’ve become quite good at). I feel I can be quite useful, if I only know my limits (as others have never instructed me not to add the links that you have summarily deleted, even users who have hundreds of thousands more edits than yourself). Anyway, I didn’t mean anything personal by fixing the typo in your (one) description segment; I was just trying to learn from what you published. My experiences are author, editor, proofreader, and baseball aficionado. I have worked for numerous publishers and sports publications and currently do work for bbref (ongoing), SABR (nascent, but been doing drips & drabs for several years), and Wiki (for the time being) — the SABR bit is ramping up & I’m new to Phoenix — it’s like Roy Hobbs: They don’t quite know what use they’ll find for me, just yet. Well, thanks in advance for any guidance.... Have a terrific day!! —Doug Jimmiefoxx (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Doug, I would refrain from adding any links to sites such as Ultimate Mets Database and Astros Daily, as these are fan-run sites without any credibility. This is similarly why I have been deleting the archived links to Baseball Library, as all the site contained was a few lines of blog text on the subject. See number 11 on WP:ELNO. Penale52 (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Attack in Brussels listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Attack in Brussels. Since you had some involvement with the Attack in Brussels redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. B dash (talk) 05:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Bo Ackal

Passes WP:POLITICIAN by a mile since he is a former State legislator. Please withdraw the AFD....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Cuban Baseball Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion

Category:Cuban Baseball Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for conversion into a list. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bismarck Churchills

A tag has been placed on Category:Bismarck Churchills requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Bill Carter (baseball) / Elmer Carter

Are these 2 players the same person? Look at the seamheads for Bill [1] vs. the B-R for Elmer [2]. Do you know which is which? Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 06:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

I now believe they are the same person. I've come across several of these cases where the biographical info on Seamheads and Baseball-Reference is very contradictory. I'm assuming because Seamheads has been constantly updating their Negro league database while Baseball-Reference hasn't really touched theirs since they added it. But this time I think Seamheads may be the one misleading here. The Biographical Encyclopedia of the Negro Baseball Leagues and this document refer to him as Elmer "Willie" Carter." However, I can't find a source that confirms he played for the Monarchs, like this article and Elmer's Wiki page suggest, but it looks like Elmer's page needs this stints with Little Rock and St. Louis added. I'm not sure why Seamheads doesn't give any indication that Bill Carter went by or was really named Elmer. I can go ahead and redirect Bill's page to Elmer's and update that unless you disagree.Penale52 (talk) 14:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Well, cnlbr.org has a Elmer "Snake Eyes" Carter on KC in '30 & '31 [3] (on p.7) & BBinWartime does also [4], but I think that is possibly a different person somehow, but maybe not? Rgrds. -Bison X (talk) 17:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

John Mayasich

Hi Penale52, when you updated John Mayasich, I had added an image to that page six minutes earlier, and I think you may have unintentionally removed it when you made other changes. Or was it intentional? Thanks, JonP125 (talk) 19:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I'm so sorry I literally have no idea how that happened. All I did (or thought I did) was remove this line "John was part of the 75th MSHSL ALL STAR TEAM. 3/9/19" but somehow other stuff was changed. I really am very confused, I didn't even click on any other part of this page, so I'm not sure why anything in the infobox or citations or categories is saying I edited them. Penale52 (talk) 20:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jones (third baseman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jones (third baseman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jones (third baseman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein 08:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Lewis (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lewis (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis (baseball) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Therapyisgood (talk) 01:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4