User talk:A1Cafel

Hello, Naughty Jeffrey, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —EncMstr (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A1Cafel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been a really, really long time since my last time been here. I was blocked due to violating one of my editing restriction "one account restriction". Now I understand that the restriction means that I can only edit using this account, logged-out edits are also disallowed. I will make use of the "keep me logged in" function to avoid any accidental logged-out. I will check the logging status every time before I submit an edit, as this is my resposbility. Since I was unblocked in February 2018, I made lots of useful edits to the Wikipedia, mainly in the area of tropical cyclones, in which I will stick in if I get unblocked, because I have a strong interest in it. The past contribution could prove my willingness to build the encyclopedia and improve the community, rather than making vandalism or disruptive editing. I won't mind waiting for a longer time until I get unblocked. If I get unblocked, I'm willing to accept a stricter editing restriction if necessary. I will also accept probation from others on my edits. Have a nice day and all the best.

Decline reason:

I echo JBW's prior unblock request. You were given clear conditions, you violated them. You had your second chance and blew it. I don't see a path forward for you here. Yamla (talk) 12:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

A1Cafel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I truly understand what I have done previously upsets someone. I understand that my past edits are not a "jail-free" card, but can act as a reference. Besides my edits here, I have also made a lot of useful contributions at zhwiki (my home wiki), which is also a proof that I can properly contribute on other Wikipedia site. I still believe there is a path for me to be unblocked, regardless the time taken. I won't mind wait for a very long time to get unblock. As said before, I'm willing to accept a stricter editing restriction if necessary. I will also accept probation from admins and other editors (particularly on tropical cyclones, which I have a strong interest) on my edits. All the best.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I truly understand what I have done previously upsets someone. I understand that my past edits are not a [[Get Out of Jail Free card|"jail-free" card]], but can act as a reference. Besides my edits here, I have also made a lot of useful contributions at zhwiki (my home wiki), which is also a proof that I can properly contribute on other Wikipedia site. I still believe there is a path for me to be unblocked, regardless the time taken. I won't mind wait for a very long time to get unblock. As said before, I'm willing to accept a stricter editing restriction if necessary. I will also accept probation from admins and other editors (particularly on tropical cyclones, which I have a strong interest) on my edits. All the best. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I truly understand what I have done previously upsets someone. I understand that my past edits are not a [[Get Out of Jail Free card|"jail-free" card]], but can act as a reference. Besides my edits here, I have also made a lot of useful contributions at zhwiki (my home wiki), which is also a proof that I can properly contribute on other Wikipedia site. I still believe there is a path for me to be unblocked, regardless the time taken. I won't mind wait for a very long time to get unblock. As said before, I'm willing to accept a stricter editing restriction if necessary. I will also accept probation from admins and other editors (particularly on tropical cyclones, which I have a strong interest) on my edits. All the best. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I truly understand what I have done previously upsets someone. I understand that my past edits are not a [[Get Out of Jail Free card|"jail-free" card]], but can act as a reference. Besides my edits here, I have also made a lot of useful contributions at zhwiki (my home wiki), which is also a proof that I can properly contribute on other Wikipedia site. I still believe there is a path for me to be unblocked, regardless the time taken. I won't mind wait for a very long time to get unblock. As said before, I'm willing to accept a stricter editing restriction if necessary. I will also accept probation from admins and other editors (particularly on tropical cyclones, which I have a strong interest) on my edits. All the best. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I am reviewing the unblock request and I am confused. First of all, the unblock request caught my attention because it is showing up in the category as being pending since February 2020. That would certainly be alarming, but seems to be a mistake by the bot. (Does anyone know if there's someone whose attention should be called to that?)

On the substance, I would readily agree that this user is out of chances ... except that the prior issues appear to be several years old. If there really has been no socking since 2020 or 2021, I would be more open to considering that the editor might be ready to write a new chapter. @Yamla, Bbb23, and JBW: can you help me unravel the chronology here, or share any other thoughts? Thanks, Newyorkbrad (talk) 13:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The unblock request was made at the end of last month, definitely 2024 rather than 2020. I'm not sure what's going on with the claim it's been pending since 2020. I'm literally not sure how a bot would even think that. As to the technical evidence, I see no reason to believe there's been recent block evasion, though it's a noisy range. To be clear, though, that's enough to clear the checkuser hurdle unless anyone has evidence to the contrary. --Yamla (talk) 13:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre. It's thinking this is the current unblock request. It clearly isn't. Clearing the cache on the category page didn't help. I wonder if it's getting confused because the unblock request wasn't signed. I'm at a loss. --Yamla (talk) 13:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Newyorkbrad: What category are you referring to?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bbb23: CAT:RFU, the first entry under on-wiki. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 14:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't patrol that category, so I don't know what it normally says in that column, but glancing at others, it looks to me like they're all "wrong".--Bbb23 (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the aid of any reviewing admin: c:User talk:A1Cafel#F2C ban happened only a few weeks ago. It seems wrong to unblock someone who got themselves in trouble on a sister project only weeks ago. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]