Jump to content

User talk:PatGallacher/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15

January 2019

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vladimir the Great. Your edit appears to be disruptive and has been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Caution for repeated addition of category "Ukrainian rapist"/"rapist" to the article. There's no source supporting it, and also no other editor supporting it on the talk page of the article, all there is, is your personal interpretation of an ambiguous passage in the 1911 edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 21:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

I question if this edit was disruptive, we should be in favour of investigating historic sexual abuse cases, but I will confine myself to the talk page for the time being. PatGallacher (talk) 00:28, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

BTW, you were clearly wrong when you said that no other editor supporting it on the talk page. Maxaxax did, you are presumably aware of this since you posted a similar warning on her talk page. Maybe it's your editing that's getting a bit tendentious. PatGallacher (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a newspaper, so we do not "investigate historical sexual abuse cases", we only report what reliable sources unequivocally say, without any own interpretation of what sources may mean by what they say (see WP:OR and WP:SYNTH). Or in other words, if the sources don't expressly say he raped her, we can't say so either, neither in the text of the article nor through adding categories that say so. And in this case it's all based on your interpretation of an ambiguous phrase in EB1911, referring to a thousand-year-old legend about how his marriage came to be (the only thing there's historical evidence for is that they got married, and had several children...). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 08:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pedro Ponce de León (Adelantado), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Fernán Pérez Ponce de León

Hello, PatGallacher,

Thanks for creating Fernán Pérez Ponce de León! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:18, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pedro Ponce de León (Adelantado)

Hello, PatGallacher,

Thanks for creating Pedro Ponce de León (Adelantado)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please stop creating unreferenced articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jade Ramsey

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jade Ramsey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 20:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of HM Advocate v Salmond for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HM Advocate v Salmond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HM Advocate v Salmond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RhinosF1 (talk) 06:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josep Margarit has been accepted

Josep Margarit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

sock reversion

I reverted a sock and explained this already. Checkuser-confirmed sock. It wasn't an unexplained deletion so your edit summary is disingenuous. If you can't accept that it is a sock then report this to ANI and we'll discuss there. I'm reverting a banned sock/LTA in the course of my admin duties and not INVOLVED.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:29, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

If you were reverting a sock fair enough, but I don't think your summary was entirely clear. PatGallacher (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

I accept that and will try to be clearer in the future.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Can you check on a user. Please!

Deepsighs is the name. I am worried it’s the same person who had multiple accounts ( fake ) like lukespan and saskia lou. Oshwah closed those accounts but i think she made a new one. Vdh m (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Will look into this given time, but I am a little busy at present, might you be better raising this with an admin? PatGallacher (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I have had a look at it, I agree this looks suspicious, I have put a couple of warnings on their talk page, but I suggest we leave it unless more happens. PatGallacher (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Alejandro Vilca moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alejandro Vilca, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 21:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Objection, Argentine provincial deputies are inherently notable. PatGallacher (talk) 01:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alejandro Vilca (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stevey7788 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please demonstrate notability through more reliable sources. Use inline citations.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Stevey7788 (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, PatGallacher! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Stevey7788 (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Alejandro Vilca has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alejandro Vilca. Thanks! — Stevey7788 (talk) 16:09, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alejandro Vilca (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires more verifiable references to prove notability of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 18:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Cawdron (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thegooduser was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
IMDb cannot be used as a source
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 21:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Liane Aukin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Liane Aukin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Normandie-Niémen (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Normandie-Niémen (film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:54, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Alan Tyrrell

Hello, PatGallacher,

Thanks for creating Alan Tyrrell! I edit here too, under the username Girth Summit and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

It would be really helpful if you could find another source to refer to, and perhaps add some in-line citations. Cheers!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit (blether) 17:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Josep Margarit moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Josep Margarit, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Pat, creating unreferenced articles is something you've been doing for years despite many warnings. Can you please agree to use WP:AFC in the future? They will keep you right and give you advice so articles are unlikely to be deleted or draftified once they're in mainspace. Boleyn (talk) 09:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Pat, can you please respond to the above message? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Pat, can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 21:12, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Well, this article is now in the main space, I may look into improving it if you give me a bit more time. PatGallacher (talk) 23:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Eugène Mordant

Hello, PatGallacher,

Thanks for creating Eugène Mordant! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for 3 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shetland pony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cruachan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

As a general rule this may be true, but in this case the issues were more complicated. PatGallacher (talk) 16:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Northern Ireland MLAs 2016–17 has been nominated for discussion

Category:Northern Ireland MLAs 2016–17, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  21:12, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Khaled Aghbariyya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khaled Aghbariyya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaled Aghbariyya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:21, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:River Tyne, Tasmania

Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "River Tyne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:32, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Trotskyist League (United States) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trotskyist League (United States) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trotskyist League (United States) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toa Nidhiki05 21:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kenza Drider for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenza Drider is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenza Drider (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 07:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Karin Foley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karin Foley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karin Foley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Quentin S. Crisp moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Quentin S. Crisp, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 11:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Liane Aukin

Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Liane Aukin.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Normandie-Niémen (film)

Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Normandie-Niémen (film).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

"Irene of Thessalonica (Q264096)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Irene of Thessalonica (Q264096). Since you had some involvement with the Irene of Thessalonica (Q264096) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Bobby Seagull concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bobby Seagull, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Martel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Battle of the Brig of Dee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of the Brig of Dee, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:26, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of the Brig of Dee (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, PatGallacher! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Willie Rough

Notice

The article Willie Rough has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of it meeting WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 13:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of the Brig of Dee has been accepted

Battle of the Brig of Dee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 02:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bobby Seagull

Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bobby Seagull".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 07:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Wha'll be King but Charlie? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wha'll be King but Charlie? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wha'll be King but Charlie? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hydromania (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

The Rocking Horse Winner (1977 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Rocking Horse Winner (1977 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 15:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Alberto Sánchez Pérez moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alberto Sánchez Pérez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 03:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:MEPs for the United Kingdom 2019–2024 has been nominated for discussion

Category:MEPs for the United Kingdom 2019–2024, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Notice regarding BLPs

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please do not reinstate disputed edits without consensus on the talk page. SPECIFICO talk 23:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

And specifically, see the relevant part of the BLP policy (which applies to the recently deceased): "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives" "Avoid repeating gossip." The word "supposedly" in an allegation of a crime in a BLP is a big red flag. Acroterion (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Well I did take it to RFC, as some people suggested. Whether allegations of sexual assault are "titillating" is debatable, to say the least. PatGallacher (talk) 18:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, looking for a edit you made

You fixed my afd, but I'm trying to get the link. Do you have it?, It was around December 21st, 2019. Thanks. New3400 (talk) 00:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Cawdron concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert Cawdron, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nádia Lippi

Notice

The article Nádia Lippi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only sourced to IMDB, does not appear to be sufficiently notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (talk) 11:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Dabs

If she's referred to as "HBC" then it needs to go in the article first, so I've commented out [1] per WP:DABACRO. Widefox; talk 14:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PatGallacher/Archive_12&oldid=1048398515"