User talk:PatGallacher/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:PatGallacher. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Karen Fishwick
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Karen Fishwick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Karen Fishwick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Fishwick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Fishwick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 05:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Chilt01
Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chilt01 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Conrad Murray trial is online here (California time I think)
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2011/09/live-stream-dr-conrad-murray-trial-michael-jackson-s-death-watch-it-here-live — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Andrew Moray (justiciar), PatGallacher!
Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Just stub at the moment though with links and categories
To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.
Learn more about page curation. — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Ways to improve Sopiko Khukhashvili
Thanks for creating Sopiko Khukhashvili, PatGallacher!
Wikipedia editor Pigsonthewing has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:
Please provide references
The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Pigsonthewing's talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the the Teahouse.
Learn more about page curation. — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Audrey Erskine Lindop, PatGallacher!
Wikipedia editor Wikfr just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I will look for references.
To reply, leave a comment on Wikfr's talk page.
Learn more about page curation. — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Jennifer Croxton) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Jennifer Croxton, PatGallacher!
Wikipedia editor PrinceSulaiman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please consider improving it otherwise it may be challenged for deletion.
To reply, leave a comment on PrinceSulaiman's talk page.
Learn more about page curation. — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Dear PatGallacher,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note"). — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
See Talk:Prince Regent -- PBS (talk) — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Stavroula Tsolakidou) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Stavroula Tsolakidou, PatGallacher!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've added some text references so notification is provable - hope this is OK.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation. — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Philip Glanville) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Philip Glanville, PatGallacher!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've added a source and reflist.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation. — Before 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Reynolds image
Did you mean to change the image that I had changed it to here? thanks --Jennica✿ / talk 02:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
I pass no judgement on which was the better image, but the way you did it screwed up the article. We might go back to the issue in a more considered way once the flurry of activity on this article has died down. PatGallacher (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- My bad. I didn't realize it screwed it up. --Jennica✿ / talk 02:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
You tagged this article for lack of notability, for three weeks, during the Christmas holiday season, when nobody is looking, and then propose deletion? Please, don't bite the newbies, and go to WP:AFD for any controversial deletions. FWIW, I'd argue that as head of the House of Hohenberg, he's notable. At worse, the articles could be merged. Bearian (talk) 23:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- You could get more people looking during the Xmas holiday season, since they would be off work. I have no wish to bite the newbies. PatGallacher (talk) 23:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Mudyug concentration camp moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Mudyug concentration camp, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. 
czar 18:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Elazar ben Tsedaka ben Yitzhaq for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elazar ben Tsedaka ben Yitzhaq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elazar ben Tsedaka ben Yitzhaq until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Mudyug concentration camp
Welcome to Wikipedia. I replied to your message about Mudyug concentration camp on my user talk page by asking two questions of you. I am still waiting for replies. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mudyug concentration camp (March 9)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mudyug concentration camp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! PatGallacher,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 05:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Mary Shelton
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Mary Shelton, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_(Madge)_Shelton. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
- It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Margaret (Madge) Shelton. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Margaret (Madge) Shelton, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TopCipher (talk) 10:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The article Frederick Hooper (adventurer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Domdeparis (talk) 13:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Did she participate? The results?Xx236 (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- She lost.Xx236 (talk) 07:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fort William, Highland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Inverlochy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Margo Cunningham
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Margo Cunningham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 01:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Margo Cunningham for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margo Cunningham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margo Cunningham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 01:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Chokwe Antar Lumumba has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Natalie Reid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natalie Reid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Reid (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Katie Bonnar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katie Bonnar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Bonnar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
2022
Per WP:RY, scheduled elections are not listed in year articles unless there is something unusual. How much more nonnotable is the last possible day for such an election? I apologize for my brusque edit comment. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Caution when adding protection requests
Hello. I want to tell you that your recent request for a page's protection accidentally deleted my recent request for other pages, which I had to manually restore. I just want to ask you to please be careful with other users' requests when adding yours to the list. Thanks for understanding. –WPA (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake. PatGallacher (talk) 20:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Sub judice question
I've created an edit notice for the Hillsborough Disaster page, so that editors will be warned upon opening the edit interface. Does sub judice extend to public enquiries, or is it only when criminal proceedings are in place. This could potentially affect the Grenfell Tower fire article. Mjroots (talk) 11:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- I am not sure of the law on this issue, you would need to ask a lawyer. However in the past Wikipedians have tended to object to people jumping the gun on this issue, before someone has been formally charge. PatGallacher (talk) 13:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, I won't create an edit notice just yet then. Another article likely to be affected in the near future is the 2015 Shoreham Airshow crash, where there is a strong possibility that the pilot involved will be charged with various offences. Mjroots (talk) 13:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Take My Wife (1979 TV series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Take My Wife (1979 TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take My Wife (1979 TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Aurelio Díaz (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PRehse (talk) 08:43, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Evita#Requested move 29 July 2017
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Evita#Requested move 29 July 2017. Hi, I noticed you were involved in the previous move request. I have opened another on whether the musical should be made wp:primary. --Nevé–selbert 18:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Argentine provincial elections, 2017
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Argentine provincial elections, 2017!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your source(s).
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 12:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PatGallacher. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Héctor Recalde, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Héctor Recalde to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks,
Onel5969 TT me 15:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Pat. I've just nominated Jennifer White Shah for deletion. The only significant coverage of her I can find is related to her hubby's troubles, but if you have better sources that deal with her career you can remove the proposed deletion tag. --Hillbillyholiday talk 13:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Pedro José de Fonte y Hernández Miravete
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Pedro José de Fonte y Hernández Miravete!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Cat Boyd
On multiple occasions you have added material to this article without there being any corresponding source to support it. I went through the article and removed some material where there is no source apparent, or where it appears to conflict with information in existing sources. You reinstated this unsourced material without any attempt to provide sources for it. As the article is the biography of a living person I have again removed these unsourced claims. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
No source? I added the material as a cite https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/11/voted-corbyn-scottish-independence-labour-nationalist - You have absolutely no right to call this vandalism. She quite clearly states she votes Labour now. Briever (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Briever
I never said this was vandalism or unsourced. I did say that I thought it was undue weight and using Wikipedia as a platform to put this in the lede, since this point is included, with the link you mention, later in the article. PatGallacher (talk) 20:20, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
I'd like to propose a deletion to the article 'List of Television Shows considered the Worst".
Under the 'Gameshow' section the ITV comedy hypnosis show 'You're Back in the Room' is listed and I think it's wrong for it to be included.
In the (unusually) brief description it states that it was poorly received and panned for being fraudulent. It then cites an article that was first self published on the internet and picked up by the Daily Mail BEFORE the first episode had actually aired! When the first episode did air it was the highest rated entertainment launch of the year (BARB analysis) and even won the International Formats Awards Best Studio-based Gameshow in 2016. There were also some positive reviews that can be found very easily online and it sold to several international territories. I don't believe it's inclusion in the list adheres to Wikipedia's own parameters and metrics for this article:
"NOTE: Before adding shows. Remember-- this is "worst." There are a lot of "bad" shows out there. There are a lot of shows which individual people might consider "worst." However, it should only be listed as a worst show if it can be attributed as such in at least one reliable source." Paul9006 (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Miles Walker Mattinson
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Miles Walker Mattinson!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this article. Like many you've created, it has no clear sources. Is the external link actually a source? If so, can you make it clear in the article, or let me know and I'll amend it for you. If it is not, can you please add your source? Could you please start making your references clear/clearer in the articles? Thanks for your time.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 18:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Willie Rough
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Willie Rough!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this article. It is by a notable writer and has some notable cast members, but the case isn't clear from the article how the play itself meets WP:NOTABILITY. It also has no references, unless the external link is actually a source, in which case please edit to make this clear. Thanks for creating this article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 18:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Mudyug concentration camp concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mudyug concentration camp, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
The article Muriel McKay has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 23:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Louis Héron for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis Héron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Héron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Warning
PAt, I contacted you yesterday about not adding references to articles you create, as I and other editors have discussed with you before. You not only didn't add a source to that article, you within hours created Muriel McKay, a one-line unreferenced article on a possibly living person. This is disruptive and does need to stop. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Société populaire de Nantes
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Société populaire de Nantes!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as unreferenced and with unclear notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 15:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
The article Société populaire de Nantes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Information is not verified, and 'article' is so vague I'm unclear what it is actually about.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
The article Colette Wilde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Also no verified information and this is an article on a living person. There are no refernces, although it would be ineligible for a blpprod as it has an external link to a source (imdb) that is specifically banned at WP:RELIABLESOURCES.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
The article Bobby Pattinson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. BLP with no verified information, no references, just an external link to imdb, a source specifically banned at WP:RELIABLESOURCES.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Muriel McKay for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muriel McKay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muriel McKay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Juan Alfonso de Polanco
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Juan Alfonso de Polanco!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as having only one source, but is an article of good length and detail. Well done!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 05:47, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Guillaume Lamberty
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Guillaume Lamberty!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as its notability not being clear from the article and it having only one entry, which is not WP:INLINECITED and is a little unclear - looks like a book but no page numbers.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Another warning
Pat, you have been asked many times now to make clear your sourcing on articles you create - are your external links friendly suggestions or actually ources, so should have one of the usual headings of 'Notes', 'Sources' or 'References' and preferably be WP:INLINECITED. I have also asked you to communicate on many occasions, and WP:Communication is required on Wikipedia. You have continued to produce sub-stubs with all the same issues such as Baldomer Lostau i Prats - which has no clear sources. Sources are essential to articles and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator. Can you please stop creating articles without clear sources and communicate. If you do this again, I will start a discussion at WP:ANI. Boleyn (talk) 14:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
If you prefer headings like Notes to External links fair enough, but I question if this is a big deal. In the case of Baldomer, the source is the Catalan Wikipedia article. PatGallacher (talk) 15:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
See WP:DEMOLISH. PatGallacher (talk) 16:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for responding to me and for linking to an interesting essay. Thank you also for agreeing to change the title. The reason it is commonly notes, references or sources is because an external links section is often just friendly suggestions, and often in addition to references. Labelling it notes just makes it totally clear to those using it for research, but also for people like me patrolling new pages. I now know not to mark your creations as unreferenced. Boleyn (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Also, as for DEMOLISH, many of these articles, e.g. Pedro José de Fonte y Hernández Miravete, were created as much as three months ago, and tagged two months ago as unreferenced, with you being alerted at the time, and it still has no references at all. It isn't really about giving it more time. You might alo find working on something in the sandbox until it is referenced means your articles won't be regularly prodded, which can be a bit of a waste of time for you and other editors. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Mudyug concentration camp
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mudyug concentration camp".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Mandatory notice
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--John (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Ponce I, Count of Urgell
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Ponce I, Count of Urgell!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. All articles must have sources. Pat, you are well aware of this. PLEASE stop creating unreferenced articles.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 16:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eleanor Nathan
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eleanor Nathan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- Don't worry about that, I declined the request and expanded the article with some sources. Take a look and feel free to fix/expand it more. I also thought it would be a good candidate for WP:DYK and nominated it at Template:Did you know nominations/Eleanor Nathan. Regards SoWhy 09:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Ray Rigby (screenwriter)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ray Rigby (screenwriter), PatGallacher!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please do not use imdb as a source, it is specifically mentioned at WP:RELIABLESOURCES as an unreliable source. It has also been tagged as of dubious notability.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Aurelio Díaz) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Aurelio Díaz, PatGallacher!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has been tagged as a blp with no clear sources (if the external link is actually a source, please add that clearly). As a blp, it also needs its sources to be WP:INLINECITED. It has been tagged as of doubtful notability as there is no sign of meeting WP:GNG and as a seemingly local politician, he may not meet WP:NPOL. It has also bee tagged as an orphaned page and as a stub.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Cristina Rodríguez (noble)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. PatGallacher, thanks for creating Cristina Rodríguez (noble)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as benefiting from more of the sources being inline, so readers can easily see which sources have verified which pieces of information.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.