Jump to content

User talk:Parent5446/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 1    Archive 2    Archive 3 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  ... (up to 100)


The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

Proposed deletion of The Caper Chronicles

The article The Caper Chronicles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable independent sources to indicate any notability for this web series. Only sources are the authors, the company that supported it, and the student newspaper from the University where it originated. No Google News sources at all, and no reliable independent sources could be found through a normal Google search either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

Speedy deletion declined: The Quigley

Hello Parent5446. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Quigley, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not about person, group or company therefore A7 does not apply. Suggest WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Thank you. Nancy talk 15:45, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, sorry about that. I must have read it over too fast and mistook it for something else. Thanks for noticing though. — Parent5446 ☯ (message email) 17:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Updating my refs...

Thanks for updating my refs. Aside from bare-bones referencing, I've never been able to figure out/rememeber all the useful fields... —  X  S  G  18:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it's just one of my pet peeves not having references in templates. Usually I just copy the example of Template:Cite web or Template:Cite news and copy stuff in. — Parent5446 ☯ (message email) 19:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

WikiProject Google

-- iBen (talk) 21:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

Line breaks

Okay, I don't understand why people can't use line breaks..The text reads, "Foundation Place (Date)"..meanwhile,your version has the date which appears to be drooping down off the first line and partially on the second....the line break keeps that info on its own line, making it look neat and where everything can be read on a single line. Thats all. Please keep it the way it is. Tinton5 (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

WikiProject Google Update

User:Mono/Google

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

Discussion at Talk:Google

You are invited to join the discussion here. mono 00:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

I really don't understand whats so important about the logo I mean damn it's just a logo everything has to get updated iCEMAN247 02:31, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the talk page? The Google Press Page has the old logo as their official product logo. The logo may have been "updated" for Google's services, but their company logo has not changed. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ...

... for reverting the recent vandalism to my talk page! -- Bgpaulus (talk) 17:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

Camry Hybrid

Hi. This is just to let you know that considering that your main argument is that both pieces look the same, I think that you might have been misled by the fact that during these two weeks of discussion here, OSX has been moving little by little a good deal of the original content in the Camry Hybrid article to the new article Toyota Camry (XV40) and yesterday he trimmed it so now they both look the same. Just check the history of both articles beginning June 12 to confirm. If you still believe they should be merged, it is fine, I just want to make sure you were aware of this fact.-Mariordo (talk) 03:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

Interview request: The newbie experience, revert communication and $10 to the WMF

I'm concluding the study related to the NICE user script (that you installed at some point), and I'd like to ask you some questions about your experiences with and ideas about Wikipedia. The questions will be related to how you interact with new editors and the way you communicate when reverting. The chat should take about 45 minutes to an hour and can happen over phone, voip(skype) or instant messenger(gtalk, ICQ, AIM, etc.). As thanks for your time, I'll donate $10 (US) to the Wikimedia foundation at the completion of the interview. If you are interested or need more information, please let me know. --EpochFail(talk|work) 16:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

I have renominated Jehovah's Witnesses reference works for deletion (third-party sourced material already merged to Jehovah's Witnesses publications) at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jehovah's_Witnesses_reference_works_(2nd_nomination), and have mentioned your previous participation at the first discussion, the result of which was No consensus.--Jeffro77 (talk) 03:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Google Discussion

User:Parent5446 please join the discussion at Talk:Google#Google Web Search - Dictionary Results , your input is appreciated. Fixblor (talk) 22:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

List of minor Airbender characters

I also doubt the page will hold, given the current view being taken of such pages, but the speedy deletion criteria are interpreted literally, and you'll have to take it to AfD. I suggest though you give the author a few days first to try to find references. Who knows--maybe something's been published. I've seen stranger. DGG ( talk ) 21:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DGG. I was just a little overzealous since I already spent so much time convincing everybody to delete the last minor characters articles. Also to be frank, I don't think I've ever used the G4 criteria before, which probably accounts for my inexperience. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 22:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
no problem. The question is how to provide information without excessive details. I'd support a list with one sentence of identification for each, but certainly nothing more. I don't like to edit these down, though, as I don't know the series. DGG ( talk ) 22:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to say that even though we disagreed about the worthiness of the article, it was thanks to your efforts that pointed out many of the flaws in it. If it weren't for your pushing, I wouldn't have tried to find good third-party sources for the article such as an episode review, like this one which basically gives a plot summary of an episode. http://www.denofgeek.com/television/410190/avatar_the_last_airbender_episode_5_review.html While I don't have the time to comb through every episode, this opens the door for other editors to contribute :)---CodeHydro 03:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zuko-Season 3.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zuko-Season 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

Merge discussion

I am sorry if I came out like a nuisance or something with the merge discussion. It also looks like it's a dead conversation now with no clear discussion. Good luck on figuring what template look looks best. That was a tough one for me so I just left it be. Jhenderson777 (talk) 18:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem. I was involved in many similar discussions, such as when the List of Avatar: The Last Airbender major secondary characters was up for deletion, or when we merged all the episode article, or when we merged all the bending articles. Each time, it was always a struggle because in-universe or not, the articles have content, and many editors are not willing to let go of it, and for good reasons too! As for your behavior, I believe you acted like any other protective editor would in the same situation, but thanks for apologizing. Happy editing! — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 22:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

google criticism

hello,

you renamed/removed google criticism section. i don't think that is good. also, readTalk:Google#Why_is_there_no_criticism_section.3F_There.27s_certainly_lots.

for example, yahoo has extensive Yahoo!#Criticism_and_controversy. an article without it doesn't do justice to NPOV principle.

regards.

ps. you can respond here, i will see it... 89.216.196.129 (talk) 07:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry to respond so late. I've been on vacation for the past few days. Anyway, the reason we removed the Criticism section is because it tends to encourage POV. You could either single out all the controversial information about a company, or distribute it throughout the article. The latter is more appropriate for a number of reasons. Firstly, when criticism is bunched up in one section, it is much more likely that POV tone will find its way in. Furthermore, a separate criticism section is actually counterproductive to a prospective reader. If a reader comes looking for info on Google's products, they'll come to the Google article, and go to the Products section. They read a little, find out all the great things about Google, but they never hear the other side, they never hear the criticism, because it's not there. By distributing the criticism, it will always be found by the reader, and the reader will always hear all sides of the story, thus preserving NPOV. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 18:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-101

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-101 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-102

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-102 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-103

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-103 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-104

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-104 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-105

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-105 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-106

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-106 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-107

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-107 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-108

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-108 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-109

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-109 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-110

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-110 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-111

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-111 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-112

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-112 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-113

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-113 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-114

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-114 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-115

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-115 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-116

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-116 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-117

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-117 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-118

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-118 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-119

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-119 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-120

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-120 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-201

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-201 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-202

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-202 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-203

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-203 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-204

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-204 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-205

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-205 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-206

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-206 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-207

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-207 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-208

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-208 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-209

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-209 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-210

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-210 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-211

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-211 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-212

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-212 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-213

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-213 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-214

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-214 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-215

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-215 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-216

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-216 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-217

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-217 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-218

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-218 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-219

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-219 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-220

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-220 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-301

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-301 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-302

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-302 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-303

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-303 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-304

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-304 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-305

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-305 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-306

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-306 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-307

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-307 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-308

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-308 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-310

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-310 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-311

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-311 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-312

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-312 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-313

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-313 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PR template

This edit [1] broke the template because you added spaces in a place where the parser is reading an external link, so part of the link was used as a description.

In general, the best practice is to avoid renaming templates to avoid this sort of issue. The name "PR" was just fine. However, if you insist on renaming templates, you need to test your changes more thoroughly. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:40, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

Speedy deletion of Template:Avatarref-309

A tag has been placed on Template:Avatarref-309 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 18:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concept of Ozai

Even though you nominated it for deletion. Can you help me out in figuring out where you can find a good concept of Ozai by the creators or a good reception? Jhenderson 777 14:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tried, trust me. Of course I will keep searching for more information, but I am not sure how much we will find. The problem is that he rarely appears in the series (keep in mind by appears I mean really shows up as a character and has dialogue). Even though he is probably one of the most significant characters in the entire series (being the main antagonist and all), and despite the fact he is mentioned and sometimes seen for a few seconds very often, since he does not actually show up and talk much, his character is not that well developed, or at least not well developed relative to the other characters. Anyway, as I said, I will continue to look, but I'm in my senior year of high school so my schedule is a little tight. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 00:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

Your participation in the genetic algorithms dispute

Hi Parent5446,

Fyi, I've named you as a dispute participant in an informal request for mediation that I filed at WP:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-08-29/Genetic_algorithms.

You may also be interested in the wikiquette alert I filed against User:Glrx [[2]].

Keki Burjorjee (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-08-29/Genetic algorithms

I have offered to mediate this. Please indicate your acceptance or lack on the mediation page. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 14:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

Avatar: The Last Airbender

Hi Parent5446, can you recommend a specific revisionID of the Avatar: The Last Airbender article for the Version 0.8 release? We're trying to wrap things up over the next few days. Many thanks, Walkerma (talk) 02:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The current revision 392490512 should be good. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 03:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

RfA Nomination

I Have Gave You An RfA Form, You Must answer The Questions on the page. If The Nomination Is Successful, You Will Become An Admin On English Wikipedia. See WP:RfA for more info. (And Please Remove The Template On The Top Of The Page) --S1312 (talk) 22:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parent5446, accepting S1312's RfA nomination is completely optional, even though his direct and in-your-face comment above may suggest that it is mandatory. I just don't want you to feel pressured to accept a nomination if you feel you aren't ready to run. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the stub section in Google

Concerning the removal of the stub section titled 'The World's most Attractive Employer', why not rename it to perhaps 'Employer happiness' and add more information? Perhaps expantion may help except axing it. General Rommel (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we already have a section for that. It's the employees subsection under corporate affairs. At one point we will probably need to move a lot of information into that section that is currently spread throughout the article, but the section does exist for that purpose. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 01:58, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you should move it to that section then instead of deleting it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by General Rommel (talk • contribs) 02:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I didn't delete it. I just moved it to the beginning of the Corporate affairs section, right after the sentence on Fortune magazine. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 02:34, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Right, the edit tools didn't show you moved it to another section. I'm sorry. Thanks for explaining though! General Rommel (talk) 05:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

Happy Thanksgiving!

Just drop by to wish you and your family a Happy Thanksgiving! − Jhenderson 777 15:09, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Happy Thanksgiving to you to! — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 17:31, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

Separating vehicles by generation rather than powertrain or trim level

Hi, I am just dropping a note to inform you of a discussion currently taking place here (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Mass article merger). In summary, WikiProject Automobiles is soliciting opinions based on the separation of automobile articles by generation, as opposed to other means such as powertrain or trim level. For example, rather than having an article on the Audi S3, the Audi A3 article would be split into two sub-articles (one for each generation), and the S3 content would be moved to the appropriate location. This would place automobiles with common engineering in the same place, as opposed to grouping by a mere marketing term. Since separate articles are always provided to detail the powertrain (engine and transmission, et cetera), the partitioning of articles based on this principle is superfluous (the powertrain is only briefly discussed in the article about the car). The reason for giving the actual powertrain a separate article is to cut down on overlap: engines and transmissions are almost universally used in more than one model.

This message will be/has been posted on the talk page of all editors who contributed to the previous discussion at Talk:Toyota Camry Hybrid. Regards, OSX (talk • contributions) 23:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

question.

Hey, I was just wondering. How would you feel if this replaces the Appa article. Do you think a fictional duos article like this will work. Feel free to correct any mistakes on the userpage if there is is as well. − Jhenderson 777 22:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really feel that they don't warrant notability individually as much as the major characters of the show are. But putting them together really seems to help with that and makes for an interesting article. − Jhenderson 777 22:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind fixing {{subst:avatarref-204}} on the article Appa and Momo to whatever it is you were intending to do. I am pretty sure that's not what you intended to do. And also here I am being more specific on what I meant. ;) − Jhenderson 777 19:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you are willing to help, I am trying to find critical reception and other external links for proving notability for Appa and Momo and maybe other individual Avatar characters as well. If you notice any just let me know, alright. ;) − Jhenderson 777 21:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

Happy Birthday

--Monterey Bay (talk) 05:30, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Appa and Momo for deletion

The article Appa and Momo is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appa and Momo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. rʨanaɢ (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

comment

"That comment was out of line."
Ouch! That was harsh. I hope I explained myself a little better. − Jhenderson 777 02:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuzco Academy

Given numerous concerns expressed about the probability of repeated recreation, you probably should have left this colsure to an Admin who would have been in a position to address those concerns by protecting the redirect. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 04:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I requested the redirect be protected, but in the future I'll just leave these cases up to admins. Sorry about that. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 04:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

Unblock Me

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Parent5446 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
72.89.141.159 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy, such as a VPN service. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you are using an open proxy or VPN service, you will need to disable it or turn it off in order to edit Wikipedia.

If you believe you are not using an anonymizing proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer using your IP address who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the Unblock Ticket Request System.

More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). For more information, see the WikiProject on Open Proxies.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using an open or anonymizing proxies in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

Decline reason: I'm sorry, but we do not allow editing from behind open proxies. It appears that at least one port is open - you may want to check that. TNXMan 15:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm not editing from behind a proxy. My computer has a direct connection to the Internet. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 03:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I really think that a declined unblock request needs to be left as is. I will pass your message to User:Tnxman307; of course you can post another unblock request. Tiderolls 03:53, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, the problem is that I can only edit this page so I have no way of contacting other editors. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 04:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. I have left Tnxman a message and will follow up elsewhere if need be. Thanks for your patience. Tiderolls 04:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have to take a look at this later today. You may want to look at User:ProcseeBot, as it is the one that identified an open port. TNXMan 14:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. My computer does have a bunch of open ports, but only because I host a website and other similar services on a server in my network. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 21:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

Removing Speedy at Talk:Avatar: Legend of Korra

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Talk:Avatar: Legend of Korra, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:50, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I Just Need Clarification.

Why is my article nominated for deletion? It, in my opinion, is notable. The original series was a HUGE hit, and this has gained quite a bit of publicity. I used sources. I was unbias and tried to make it as encyclopedic as possible. I know that you probably didn't nominate Korra for deletion, but since you posted the message on my talk page, I thought you could help.

Nothing against you, and I'm trying not to seem yellish; I'm not yelling, I'm complaining. If you could respond, please do. Play Monster Rancher!

Hey Monster Rancher, unfortunately, notability is a big gray area, so truthfully I cannot say for a fact the article is not notable, it's just of my opinion that Korra, a character in a television series yet to be released, isn't notable enough to deserve her own article. The thing is that though the original series may have been great, its Korra herself that has to be notable for her to deserve her own article, meaning there have to be a significant number of outside sources specifically having to do with Korra. If you head over the Aang article, you'll notice how there are citations to reviews of Aang's character, interviews with the creators, among other sources. Currently, the only sources in the Korra article are Avatar Wikia articles, which are not considered reliable sources. I would wait until the new series makes it debut to start branching off and making character articles. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 04:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hrm...I see your point. Thank you for clearing that up. However, as it stands, I will not do anything to try to delete that page. Your right. Notability is very relative and...well, I can't find the word for it. But thanks for clearing that up.

Play Monster Rancher! (talk)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

Talkback

Hello, Parent5446. You have new messages at Monster Rancher the Great's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Parent5446. You have new messages at Monster Rancher the Great's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sokka page

Apparently this page got deleted, and I didn't even know it was up for deletion. Do you happen to know how I can find the deletion discussion? While it probably was a proper deletion I would at least like to see the discussion on it. I can't seem to find any reference to it at all.Derekloffin (talk) 08:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's confusing because there seems to be showing multiple deletions on it from some administrators. The last reason seemed to stated Prod but I don't remember seeing no prod. Jhenderson 777 20:42, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Uggh, I think this might be partially my fault. About a week ago, User:Monster Rancher the Great (now a blocked sockpuppet) nominated the article for PROD thinking it would trigger people to "fix" the article, whatever that means. I was about to revert it but I was on my way out of the house and didn't have time, and by the time I came back, I had completely forgot about it. If we message an admin, we could probably get it restored because of the user who deleted it. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 21:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I agree with the admin thing. But the question is who? What about User:Rjanag? He's been around with these type of articles sometimes. I did contact the last one who deleted it but no response so far. Jhenderson 777 01:33, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rjanag will help us out, but let's wait and see from the original admin. Generally it's not good to have one admin revert another admin's action unless it's absolutely necessary. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 02:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. I am in no hurry. As long as the article's history will be restored. That's the main concern. I will give him at least one day. The response of later messages did prove he is online to see it but that's all I can tell you. Jhenderson 777 02:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

Rebecca Black

Hey, could you please withdraw that AfD? Its a waste of editor time to continue. cheers.--Milowent • talkblp-r 19:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

Changes in TuneUpUtilities after your GA review

Hello, Parent5446. Remember I told you that I will contact you after I carried out your advises in Talk:TuneUp Utilities/GA1? So, here we go. I think its time you take a look at the new changes and advise accordingly. See how I followed your GA suggestions. Fleet Command (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parent5446, are you there? Look, I'm not here to chat; I want this article to become GA one day and you are the reviewer. Are all the problems that you noted in GA1 addressed or not? Fleet Command (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Fleet Command, I apologize if I have a life outside of Wikipedia that takes up quite a bit of time. I'll look over the article when I have time, but in the meantime, you can always just renominated the article at WP:GAN and another reviewer will look over it. In fact, that's probably a better solution since a fresh set of eyes will provide a better opinion. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 14:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your attention. Oh, and no need to apologize; everyone has a life; though it is always a good idea to ping back just in case the message is missed. (What I did.) And thanks for being so nice. Fleet Command (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

Template:`` and Template:```

Hey Parent, I was just wondering what exactly these two templates you created are to be used for, when I found them I saw no practical use for them or them being used in any necessary way so I CSDed one of them and then realized there may actually be a reason for them so I thought I would ask. Thanks for your time,  Adwiii  Talk  15:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, curious. I cannot recall when nor why I made these templates. I probably had a reason at the time but that was back when I was new to Wikipedia and had little idea what I was doing. They don't seem to be used anywhere so they can probably just be deleted. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 04:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:``

A tag has been placed on Template:`` requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks.  Adwiii  Talk  11:43, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

TUSC token 18fa3f01a542cade67d6cc5fde0d7b7f

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

— Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 20:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Google Project

— Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 20:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation Edit

test — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 20:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Parent5446, Rehman has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

— Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 20:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE GA Review

Hello, Parent5446. You have new messages at Talk:TuneUp Utilities/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 20:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Parent5446. You have new messages at Monster Rancher the Great's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 20:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


The Signpost: 3 October 2011

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

Feedback Dashboard task force

Hi Parent5446,

Since you were a part of the WikiGuides project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the Feedback Dashboard, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. Steven Walling and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at Wikipedia:Feedback Dashboard. Please sign up if you're interested in helping out! Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 November2011

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

MOTDs (This space for rent)

You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 14:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

Nomination of Bending in Avatar: The Last Airbender for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bending in Avatar: The Last Airbender is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bending in Avatar: The Last Airbender until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Sandstein  21:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

Ozai

Why did you summon me for that. I didn't create the article. Jhenderson 777 13:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Twinkle did it automatically since you have the first revision on the article. I'm going to manually notify Light2Shadow now. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 13:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Numerix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Risk analysis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Legend of Korra organization RfC

Hi, I'm contacting you becaused you started Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend of Korra (Book 2). Because it appears likely that the AfD will not end with deletion, I've set up a request for comment (RfC) on the talk page of the article about the series about how to organize the topic into subarticles. I'd appreciate it if you would add your opinion in that RfC. Regards,  Sandstein  06:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, three RFCs (or two formal ones, I guess). I'll be sure to get to them as soon as I can. Thanks for the heads up. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 15:32, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

Your GA nomination of The Legend of Korra

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article The Legend of Korra you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. ObtundTalk 02:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

GA hold on The Legend of Korra

The article The Legend of Korra you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 3 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Legend of Korra for things which need to be addressed. ObtundTalk 03:09, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some issues still need to be addressed by the way. ObtundTalk 05:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Legend of Korra GA review

The Legend of Korra is now a Good Article
Congrats! The article you nominated The Legend of Korra was just promoted to Good Article status! Great job to all of your hard work!
ObtundTalk 03:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Update for: WikiProject Good articles (Participant Clean-Up)

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter - October 2012

Delivered October 3, 2012 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter any longer, please remove your name from this list.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:42, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Parent5446/Archive_2&oldid=1166522532"