Jump to content

User talk:Param Mudgal/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2


Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!


DPS Indirapuram

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of DPS Indirapuram, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.dpsindirapuram.com/The_School.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

i have reviewed your request and i have edited the page with fresh text. now it is not copied directly from the site. Thank you for your report. --Param Mudgal (talk) 12:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Intex Technologies Limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Intex Technologies Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. EuroCarGT 17:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Param Mudgal, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Param Mudgal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Param Mudgal/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 11:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Why the confusion. He is a he. Calling him a her is confusing. Why does your kind support such nonsense? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.116.228 (talk) 01:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

The article has proof's which indicate that he himself has asked to call him a "her". There is no confusion in this at all.--Param Mudgal (talk) 07:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Param Mudgal, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 12:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Cosco (India) Limited

Good grief. You should learn how to create redirects. See Help:Redirect. Thanks, Wbm1058 (talk) 12:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your help.--Param Mudgal (talk) 13:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

About Rajpal Yadav

Hi Param! It's quite possible that the sources you mention in you speedy deletion request were copied from Wikipedia instead of the other way round. Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:17, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

They were. Please check the page history when tagging articles for deletion as copyright violations - the blog posts were clearly dated long after the text existed on the Wikipedia page. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

ok , i will keep that in mind before proposing anything for deletion.Thanks --Param Mudgal (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

In the index, the heading looks like About Rajpal Yadav rather than the correct Rajpal Yadav.
About seems to be an unusual Subcontinental name.
Since all Wikipedia articles are about something, the word "about" is redundant if not confusing.
Suggest deleting word "about" or writing "About 'Rajpal Yadav' ". Tabletop (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Rhea Kapoor

Hello Param Mudgal. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rhea Kapoor, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a copyvio; the page in question seems to be a "backwards copy" using this article's text without attribution. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

No Problem but thank you for looking in this matter. --Param Mudgal (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahrukh Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 11:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Ajaz Khan, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Param Mudgal. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 21:25, 18 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Dookudu, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Because you've added the Wrong wiki link for " Ajaz Khan " :( Raghusri 10:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


The page of Ajaz Khan had a redirect to bigg boss which i am fixing right now.This was not an experiment and that redirect will be repaired soon.You should have waited or asked me before reverting this edit.Now after i fix it then only i will add that redirect to the page Dookadu.No problem.--Param Mudgal (talk) 10:49, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
O.K. If you mentioned that one in the Edit summary i wouldn't have Warned you :) Raghusri (talk) 10:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Ohh.. I'll see to it next time.My fault.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 11:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the Positive Response :) Regards, Raghusri (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:FAIR says that a copyright image such as a promotional poster for a movie can be used on the article FOR THE MOVIE to represent THE FILM. it cannot be used willy nilly to represent items other than the film itself. Particularly a living person for whom it will be easy to gain a non copyright image. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

But actor also holds the copyright to this image as he acted in this film. So why can't this image used for his own main page?--Param Mudgal (talk) 19:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
uhh, no. you are wrong on two accounts. 1) actors do not hold the copyright for the films they are in or any publicity stills/works for the film. the rights are held most often by the producers. but 2) even if Khan was a producer or held the copyright for some other reason, it would STILL not be within our WP:FAIRuse guidelines to use the poster for anything but the film itself. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ajaz Khan Image.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Ajaz Khan Image.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from URL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)


OKK.. No problem... i accept my mistake. Will not do it in future.Thanks for the help.--Param Mudgal (talk) 05:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ajaz Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for informing.--Param Mudgal (talk) 08:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 7

Evictions happen on Saturday and that is Day 98. The show runs for 15 weeks ie 105 days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TanmayRaoM (talk • contribs) 09:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

I will write the source onto your talk page in couple of minutes.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 09:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC) where is the link TanmayRaoM (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Ok I agree he was evicted on day 97. Usually it happens on Saturday , but armaan's was a day earlier . Sorry for the confusion — Preceding unsigned comment added by TanmayRaoM (talk • contribs) 09:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok.. No problem. Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 10:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sachin Tendulkar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sachin Tendulkar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sarastro1 -- Sarastro1 (talk) 20:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sachin Tendulkar

The article Sachin Tendulkar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sachin Tendulkar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sarastro1 -- Sarastro1 (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

upload the display picture of Govinda(actor)

hi Param Mudgal , it is my humble request for you to Please upload the display picture of Govinda(actor) on wikipedia (Link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Govinda_%28actor%29). I have uploaded it so many times but everytime some issue occurs regarding license or copyright. Current display picture of Govinda is also uploaded by me and still some issue of copyright. I dont know how to fix it or upload image successfully. You can find best pictures of Govinda here http://themirchmasala.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/govinda-photoshoot.jpg

http://hamaraphotos.com/albums300_2012/wpw-20130504/hpse_normal__1644962347_%20Govinda%20photo%20shoot%20for%20designer%20Suprabha%20Jain%20%289%29.jpg

So it would be much better if you delete my picture and upload either the pictures whose link i have given above of Govinda without any licensing/copyright issue or upload any best picture of Govinda. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanraj6 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

The 1st link provided by you is not running and the second link i think has a copyright issue. Please search for any uncopyrighted image and upload this picture yourself or provide me with the link and i'll upload it for you.Thanks--Param Mudgal (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Broadcast or Broadcasted

Hi,

For you information, "broadcast" is the correct word for "broadcasted".

See Arun Lal.

Others have made the same correction.

For example:

"List of Philippine dramas broadcasted internationally is only a redirect to

"List of Philippine dramas broadcast internationally.

Please unrevert your revert.

Tabletop (talk) 00:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for informing me. I should have checked that first.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 06:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Bryant Park abuse

Hi. Were you going to report Bryan3993 and Brettspark to AIV for their tag-teaming on Bryant Park? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 06:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes,They are constantly manipulating the information of that article.It would be great if you report both these accounts to the administrators.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

OK. I will. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 06:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Sourcing and content about living people

1) While it can be a practice amenable to certain editing situations, there is no requirement to flag inappropriate content before removing it, particularly 2) when it is content about a living person, and 3) just because there is a link, does not mean that content is "sourced" - wikis, like filmyfolks.com, are specifically called out as NON-suitable sources that do not have the required reputation for fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

@TheRedPenOfDoom: Okay.I understand.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 04:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Magicians of Love, Green Forest, My Home, Lavender_(TV_series)

Please note I am just removing text I had originally added to those pages due to wiki copyvio rules (please see edit history and you'll see that I added those text). This is not any kind of vandalism just a editor trying to do right because of wiki enforcing stricter copyright rules.Jud82877 12:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jud82877: Okay, No problem but please explain your edit in the edit summary so that this doesnt happen again. Thank you and thanks for your wikipedia contributions.--Param Mudgal (talk) 16:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding, due to mass editing I see I forgot to add reasons to Magicians of Love and Lavender (TV series). Sometime in the future I do plan to go back to these pages to add original text.Jud82877 12:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jud82877: No problem, you as an editor have the right to add original text in the articles but in good intention, ie. adding quality content and properly sourced.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 12:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

I have not added wrong information, all of this i have collected from the official SLIET website and the ranking details are also true.

i do not understand why you you don't want to put complete information on wikipedia of SLIET. please give valid reason, i am just helping everyone by providing necessary information. that's all 

Ronbsto (talk) 08:44, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@Ronbsto:Then please add the information by citing sources to that.And maintain the neutrality of the article also by not adding promotional Content.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 08:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you I really appreciate you co-operation. Ronbsto (talk) 08:52, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@Ronbsto:Thank you very much for the Barnstar.If you need any help please contact me on my talk Page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 08:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Param Mudgal. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal talk 18:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Please also see my comment at WP:PERM/R regarding your contributions over the past 10 days. In a nutshell, just remember to not go too fast with semi-automated tools like Huggle and STiki. Thanks and happy reverting — MusikAnimal talk 18:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Param Mudgal, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Query

Hi Param Mudgal. I was just wondering if you could help us - after the learning curve last week with wikipedia permissions to correct information (Bauer Media Group), I'm looking for some assistance. Whilst we understand and respect (now) that we shouldn't be writing on the page, all we want is for the information on Wikipedia to be correct and accurate, as I'm sure will match the intentions of the Wiki Moderators? Can you recommend how we would go about this? Would we be able to recommend content to a moderator, such as yourself, to publsih? We also would really appreciate the warning message being removed, as it doesn't reflect well on our Comms team. Since no material on the page is from us any longer, could we try and get this taken down? Really hope you can help, we just need some guidance, as like I said, our only intentions are to make this information accurate.

Thanks

194.50.118.230 (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

@194.50.118.230:Hi, You are correct in your own sense but Wikipedia has different rules and guidelines.When you were adding information to that article without citing reliable sources then it seemed that you are adding Promotional Content in the article.You have a close contact with that article so for maintaining the neutrality of that page you were warned not to edit that article again.If you want that more information should be added to that article to make it more constructive , you can ask for changing the content or adding information on that articles talk page.If your edit has some valid reason with it, then the editors will add or change the information on your behalf.Please remember to provide reliable sources with your edit request.If you need any more help then you can ask me again on my Talk Page.I hope you got your answer.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 11:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi again, I'm using my account now so that I can get proper notifications. Could you explain what I would cite if it is our own words? We are trying to build something impartial and purely factual now that we will be post on the talk page to request that it is posted. We are in no way trying to promote the business, but the information currently on Wikipedia about Bauer Media is very out of date and incorrect, so we just want it to be an accurate representation of the business. Since we can't quote our own site due to copyrighting, there surely wouldn't be anything to actually site? Thank you very much for all your help on this, we are working to understand and comply with the rules Wikipedia has set.

Bmcomms (talk) 13:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

@Bmcomms: I'm Sorry but you can't add information to the article if you dont have any reliable references to prove it.Wikipedia do not entertain original research.But if you want any other help feel free to contact me on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 13:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

@Param Mudgal: OK - could you give me an example of what I would reference/what other brands reference? I really appreciate your help on this. Bmcomms (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

@Bmcomms: The content you are adding to the article, must be present at any reliable website or a journal or a book or any other thing.For example if you are adding that this company is in the top ten countries in the world then this line should be present at reliable websites or journals or books.I hope you understand.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 16:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

@Param Mudgal: I understand that I should cite things like that, but if you look at the current Bauer Media Group page there are only about 3 or 4 citations. Surely you can't site every single sentence?!

@Bmcomms: No, you don't have to cite every single sentence,If you are adding one paragaraph then 2-3 citations can be added.But there is no limit on the number of citations.If you are referring to material from several websites or books then you can site sources according to that.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 11:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 3 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Okay,Thanks.I'll fix it.--Param Mudgal (talk) 11:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

A bit harsh

Hi im Jeffrd10 Ive noticed your message on Andyendress talk page and I would like to say that It seems a bit harsh.Speaking from experience here I would say that Deer Park Junior/Senior High School is the editor's own school and that his first edits are tentative new steps into a scary new world where one wrong move means that the community will not accept them therefore he writes what he knows. If his first edits are immediately followed by a template telling him that he did wrong that can be an horrible feeling and scare him away. I may be over reacting however i've had something very similar with my first edits when I made this edit and got the {{vandalism-2}} on my userpage and that almost scared me away from wikipedia. So in conclusion try to reflect a bit more when you see and edit that seems like its in good faith before you leave an warning. Thank for reading and have a good time editing.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Jeffrd10: Thank you for your advice.I'll see to it next time i give a notification for a good faith revert to any new user.Thank you for your advice.Please keep guiding me if i do anything wrong here.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 16:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2

Edit Query

Hi please don't remove my provided information about a political figure of Pakistan The Sardar Aseff Ahmed Ali as I personally know him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.v.v111 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

@John.v.v111: Hi, John , You have to add reliable sources when you are adding information about a Living Person.If i will not remove then some other editor will.Instead you should add sourced and verifiable information to the article so that your information doesnt get deleted.For help see WP:References.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 10:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Swpb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mpobi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —Swpbtalk 19:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

@Swpb:May i know that which article are you talking about please?.--Param Mudgal (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Konlo

Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Indu roy (talk) 11:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

@Indu roy:Your page doesnt indicate the importance or significance of subject.If i do not tag it for deletion then someone else will.If this person is notable and has reliable sources then ask for the removal of the deletion tag on that articles talk page.Thanks--Param Mudgal (talk) 11:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

some advice

Hello @param . Since i am new to wikipedia , give me some tips. From one Indian to another. Could you award me a barnstar ?? Yours,Indu roy (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@Indu roy:I welcome you to Wikipedia, and one tip i can give you is that learn from your mistakes.Don't add unsourced information in articles,follow the rules and policies of the wikipedia community and help improve wikipedia.As for barnstars , you will get a lot of them when you are experienced enough and have made good edits for wikipedia.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 09:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Are bhai, if you can assign me an article ,I would love to help. I am best at science .Indu roy (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@Indu roy:You can choose any article you want.WP:WikiProject Bibliographies/Science task force can be of great help.It has many articles related to science.Just add your name in the participants name and get started.And please add replies at the last on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

¿¿¿¿????

I apologise for disturbing you earlier .®©§^￦¥<¢}¢£ Indu roy (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@Indu roy:No , its my duty to help and welcome the new editors on Wikipedia.You don't need to apologise.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 16:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Dante Alighieri

Yes, I think you committed a mistake. I simply added a phonetic transcription of Dante's surname (Alighieri), which also is found in the title of the entry, so that I thought it would have been useful. I took that pronunciation from Dizionario d'ortografia e di pronunzia here; it is not based on IPA but it is easy to convert. Greetings. --79.13.9.53 (talk) 12:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@79.13.9.53: Okay its fine but you should add an edit summary so that confusion doesnt arise again.Thank you for your contribution.--Param Mudgal talk? 14:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Issue on the edit made in the article Jack Skellington

This is User 98.176.40.139, but you can call me Kasey. I was wondering what was wrong with the edit I added to the Jack Skellington page? I merely wanted to note that the epilogue at the end of The official film soundtrack CD does not actually state that it is Santa giving the narrative, though it is assumed to be him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.40.139 (talk) 11:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

@98.176.40.139:Hi, I just wanted to inform you that it is very difficult to judge that whether your edit was vandalism or it is constructive when appropriate edit summary is not provided.At first instance it looked vandalism as it was an unexplained change [[1]] so i reverted it instantly.Please make constructive edits for wikipedia but please type in the edit summary explaining why you have made that change to the article.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 15:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Billy Connolly

How is citing a birthdate non-constructive? Birth dates need to be cited and the CNN video did not give a date.--209.122.114.237 (talk) 18:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Looking again, I see you did retain the birthdate cite. Thank you. But now you've introduced duplicate cites to FilmReference.com, rather than using the "ref name=Citation /" tag, which generates "a, b, c" etc. at footnotes. I don't believe you meant to introduce a duplicate link.--209.122.114.237 (talk) 18:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your edit broke the reference tag, and caused a cite error.That's why i reverted your edit.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 18:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

It might have been more constructive if you had fixed the ref tag, which is simple enough to do. I'm happy to go do it now, since I presume neither of us wants a duplicate link. --209.122.114.237 (talk) 18:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm quite busy in many other things right now.You caused that error and before saving your edit you should preview your edits made.If you have problems then you can ask me on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 18:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Have a chill off in this heat while vandals continue to vandalise! -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

@Rsrikanth05:Thank you very much.Now i feel regenerated.Cheers.--Param Mudgal talk? 10:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor!
Hello Param Mudgal.Recently you have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much for signing my guestbook. Cheers.--Pratyya (Hello!) 04:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

@Pratyya Ghosh:Thank you very much.--Param Mudgal (talk) 10:36, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Jacoby Ellsbury

I didn't post a link about his previous record for stolen bases in a game, because the link is already provided in his baseball reference page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.178.113 (talk) 16:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

No problem, but you must add an edit summary while you make edits in wikipedia.It is very helpful for the editors to understand that whether the edit is constructive or not.If you need any help you can ask me on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 17:25, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


Articles for Creation

Hi Param, the article I submitted was possibly for inclusion on the pages pertaining to Anglo-Indians Writers and Poets. I have a long history of publishing work as an Indo-Anglian writer going back 40 years. Most recently I have published the first part of my Trilogy and 4 other volumes of Poetry. While I am not resident in India, my background in writing stems from that cultural background. I was working on polishing the details further with deeper references. Thanks Marshall Gass — Preceding unsigned comment added by GassMarshall (talk • contribs) 18:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Marshall, Your article had no or very little references in a BLP.Wikipedia BLP policies are very strict and unverified information and claims have to be removed immediately from the articles.That's why your article was blanked.If you were still working on it then don't mark it for review.Tag it with under construction template and then you can work on it without any interference.If you need any more help then you can ask again on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 05:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

New Query (October)

I'm not sure how to write personal messages Wikipedia users so I'll have to write here. I changed "screenplay writing" to "screenwriting" in the Wicker Man article. You changed it back. In fact, "screenwriting" is the proper usage and no native English speaker with a fair degree of literacy would use the original construction you advocated. If you don't believe me, ask one. Or look at this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenwriting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.18.177.16 (talk) 19:31, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, sometimes unintentionally experienced editors can also commit mistakes.In that article screenplay writing seemed more appropriate so i made a good faith revert regarding that.You can again edit that article and change screenplay writing to screenwriting.If you need any more help then you can ask me on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 09:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Mobile, Alabama

Hi Param Mudgal, Thank you for fighting vandals on Wikipedia! However, on Mobile, Alabama you accepted this edit from an IP. The edit made Ariel appear as if it is in Israel. It isn´t. It is on the occupied West Bank; not even Israel itself has annexed it. In short, it was POV, bordering on vandalism. Yes, the Israel/Palestine issue is not easy!! Cheers, Huldra (talk) 08:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Huldra. I am sorry for the inconvenience caused.I should have checked the facts before accepting that edit.It shall not happen again.Thanks for informing me.--Param Mudgal talk? 09:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

I came here for the reason, but I see Huldra has already explained the problem. You could see from the edit summary that the IP was reverting another edit, so please make sure you look more carefully in future, especially if you see an IP reverting an established editor—if in doubt, leave it to someone else. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:09, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell:I will see it next time.Sorry for the inconvenience caused.--Param Mudgal talk? 16:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

AFC accepted

I thank you for accepting Dvadasaha, but there are seven earlier AFC requests of mine pending decision, which are Draft:Pravahana Jaivali, Draft:Abhutaparikalpa, Draft:Karakamsa, Draft:Pranapada, Draft:Pratiyogitvam, Draft:Bhumika and Draft:Anvaya. I do realise there is already a huge backlog of AFCs awaiting attention. Regards.Aditya soni (talk) 01:45, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

All the editors are helping in clearing the backload of AFC submissions.Your articles will be reviewed as soon as possible.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 11:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

14:41:10, 30 October 2014 review of submission by Avikbasu


I have added a brief lead section to the page, but I am not sure why the article was denied based on a lack of reliable, independent sources. There are 24 citations from 22 different authors, most of which are in peer-reviewed journals. Can you let me know how you conceptualize "reliable and independent"? Thanks. Avikbasu (talk) 14:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Avikbasu,Thanks for asking your query.Your article may have 22 sources but there are many instances which doesnt have even a single source to verify its accuracy.Such as your first title overview has 2-3 paragraphs without a single source added to them.You can see that many facts in the article are without proper references.I hope you have now understood the answer to your query.If you have any more query then you can ask me on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 07:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Article query (2nd nov)

In case I have articles for which there is no live link,but I have hard copies of these articles what do I do?(Milindc (talk) 04:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC))

Hi, Milind.First tell me what kind of hard copies do you have??--Param Mudgal talk? 10:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your signature

Dear Param Mudgal: I have the Syntax highlighter gadget turned on in my preferences. It colours the links blue, the tags pink, the comment green. etc. on the edit screen. Very handy! However, because you have the code elements in your signature a little out of order, it confuses the gadget, and everything after your signature is just grey. Would you consider moving the second set of double quotes in your signature between the "/sup" and "/span" tags? It shouldn't make any difference to the appearance of the signature. —Anne Delong (talk) 10:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

@Anne Delong:Done.--Param Mudgal talk? 17:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! —Anne Delong (talk) 23:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Creation of Draft:Abhutaparikalpa

Your AfC submissions by date/31 October 2014 has been created by me. If you want to review it please redirect here Abhutaparikalpa MacCreator (talk) 07:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Param Mudgal Saheb, I had on 31st Oct 2014 re-submitted Draft:Abhutaparikalpa and Draft:Karakamsa after necessary amendments. But today I have been informed and have duly noticed that MacCreator has today stolen these two drafts and directly created pages Abhutaparikalpa and Karakamsa in his own name. MacCreator appears to be regular offender. He was recently warned by Voceditenore with whom I have taken up this matter. Pl. take necessary steps in this regard. Thanks. Aditya soni (talk) 12:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

You need not worry.The articles have already been deleted by the administrators.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 19:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

I have added lead-sections in both cases and re-submitted the drafts - Draft:Abhutaparikalpa and Draft:Karakamsa. Thanks. Aditya soni (talk) 02:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Param Mudgal Saheb, I hope you have not abandoned my two drafts you had asked me to work on. Regards.Aditya soni (talk) 03:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Param Mudgal. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Request on 09:36:08, 21 November 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Poppy Dickson



Poppy Dickson (talk) 09:36, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

22:32:21, 25 November 2014 review of submission by Firie350


Firie350 (talk) 22:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC) Can you please explain why this draft has been declined so I can make the required chanes to get it published. Kind Regards Bernie Evans

Hi,Your submission has been declined as it doesn't cite Reliable ,Independent Sources.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 12:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Blocked vs banned

I've declined your speedy at Draft:Zerin Properties as, so far as I can see, the user is not banned and their edits were before their indef block was made. There's a difference between blocked and banned. Blocked is when someone's editing privilege is removed by an administrator. Banned is what follows a community discussion on one of the administrators' noticeboards, or a decision by the Arbitration Committee. I think Jimmy Wales may still have the power to ban, but I'm not sure if he's given it up. Unblocking can be done by any admin, except in the case of checkuser blocks which may only be undone by a checkuser. Bans can be undone by the body that put them on or, like blocks, may be time limited. Topic bans are different and are limited in scope (and liable to cause arguments at the best of times...). OK. There's another point here. A blocked or banned user can only create articles by socking. If they are named in the list as the creator, that account can't have been blocked or banned at that time. It's such a simple test that most people overlook it. In this case, the block was on Nov 8th, but the last edit was Oct 27th. You're not the first to confuse these things, and you won't be the last. Took me quite some time to get my head round it. Peridon (talk) 18:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

@Peridon: Hi, I apologise for my mistake.I will keep this in mind before tagging it for deletion.Sorry for the inconvenience caused.--Param Mudgal talk? 18:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Don't worry. There's a heck of a lot to learn in this place. The somewhere around 5 million articles that readers see is just the surface. Peridon (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Market Grain Cleaner/sandbox

Hello Param Mudgal. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Market Grain Cleaner/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The page was created before the user was blocked, so it was not created in violation of their block. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn:Hi, I will see to that whenever i tag a page for speedy deletion.Sorry for the inconvenience caused.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 19:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

I've taken a few off - @Param Mudgal if you can find any others, can you deal with them please? Thanks. Peridon (talk) 19:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

@Peridon:Ohh,sorry.I'll do it now.Thanks.

ePACT Network Ltd

Hi - I thought I was supposed to edit the page to remove any 'advertising' copy as per Lor's comments. I did put edit notes that I was trying to clean that up, but it looks like it didn't save (the page did hang for a bit when it loaded, so maybe something wiggy happened with the notes)? But I'd like to address the note by Lor to try and get this article published. Let me know if you think it has addressed that feedback or if you think it still needs work, I can jump in and make edits asap. Kim Macdonald (talk) 22:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Kim

@Kim Macdonald:Hi, You can edit the article, that's not a problem.Anyone can edit the articles in wikipedia in a productive way but please don't remove the references in the article.Anyways i think that the content in the article is not promotional, all the facts are cited by reliable sources except for one or two.You are more than welcome to edit that article to improve its quality.If you have any query then you can ask that on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 09:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

@Param Mudgal: Thank you Param! Just getting used to everything...one day I will be a master like you! :)

@Kim Macdonald: I appreciate your compliment, but no one is a master here even the Beaureucrats and the Administrators cannot call them masters of wikipedia.Wikipedia is very complex and difficult to master.We all learn from one another, I will learn from you and you will learn from me.We all are the same whether we may have been given additional rights in wikipedia or not.And you are already a master as you have tried to learn from your mistake.It is very difficult for the people to accept their mistakes, and you have done that.Wikipedia needs editors like you.Thank you for the contributions.--Param Mudgal talk? 09:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Request on 00:01:12, 18 December 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by WolverD


I am confused about your ruling that my submission's "references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability" when a link is provided that links to a YouTube recording of ABC Televisions broadcast across the entire State of South Australia regarding our National Sorry Day Celebration that would have been seen by hundreds of thousands across the State of South Australia.

In the broadcast, it states that Jesus Church was the only Church in South Austrlaia to commemorate Sorry Day and the footage shows the most notable Kuarna elder in the state (Uncle Frank Wanganeen) as well as Federal Member for Makin, Tony Zapia and Lord Mayor of Salisbury Gillian Aldridge in attendance as well as many other Kuarna elders and other dignataries in attendance.

Could you please clarify in what way you believe this independant and verifiable source does not prove worthiness as notable and therefore worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia?

WolverD (talk) 00:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

@WolverD:Hi, I just wanted to say that one youtube source does not establish notability of the subject(Jesus church).First of all your draft cites only two references, that too without inline citations.See WP:Referencing for help with this issue.Another issue with your draft is lack of Reliable Sources which are independent of subject.Your draft doesnt have sources which can support the content added by you in the History section of the draft and the influence section of the Draft.Those sources should be added which connect your Church with the information added in the draft.For example: Jesus Church first service was conducted on Sunday the 27th of November, 2011 by Church Planter and Senior Pastor Ps. David Wolverton at The Salisbury East Neighborhood Centre, located at 28 Smith Road. Salisbury East with just seven people in attendance.- Where are the sources which can support that the church's first service was conducted on 27th november 2011 and with just 7 people in attendance.So to sum it up, i will advise you to add Reliable and Independent sources inside the draft which support the information contained in it.If you have any other query then you are welcome to clarify it on my talk page.Thanks. --

Param Mudgal talk? 07:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Query

Dear Param,

I have already modified the article to reflect the referencing requirements. Also I added another article to further strengthen the claim that Dr Posoncuy is the first Filipina Neurosurgeon. I can provide you the clipping if needed.

Thank you.

Aljolar

@Aljolar: Please provide a link for that draft.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 08:58, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Question

User: Nitroboozter (talk) 02:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC),

This is regarding an edit i made to the wiki article List of tallest hotels in the world you have reversed my edit and said that it does not conform to wikipedia policies could you tell me why you think so?

@Nitroboozter: When did i say that your edit did not conform to wikipedia policies? Your edit was reverted as that name change looked unconstructive.But now i realize my mistake as the edit by you was found constructive.I apologise for that mistake but please add a one liner edit summary so that other editors doesnt get confused.Simply writing name change will not help this matter.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 08:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

John Deane Potter

Hello, Param. Thanks for looking at my submission. I appreciate that is was not fully sources. Do you need the ISBN numbers fo the book title? Does this help. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Kind regards

Harry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harold Sloan (talk • contribs) 15:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

22:05:31, 30 January 2015 review of submission by Perrydigm


I think I may have added enough references. Some of them are admittedly from the entity's own website, but I hope enough of them are from other sources to justify acceptance as a good starting Page... Perrydigm (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Perrydigm (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

@Perrydigm: Hi i am sorry for replying too late.I wasn't available for wikipedia then.I will look into your draft as soon as possible.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 12:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

08:53:36, 5 February 2015 review of submission by Guy redmill


Hello Param. Are there particular references that do not meet the Wikipedia acceptance criteria? Which? How would you improve the article? Guy redmill (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

@Guy redmill: Hi, you have to add more Independent, Reliable References in the article.For help see WP:Referencing.--Param Mudgal talk? 12:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited February 17, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entente. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Upen Patel

Hello Param i don't think i did anything wrong by posting "Not to be confused to Cesc Fabregas" on Upen Patel's page. He really does look like him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.138.236.228 (talk) 18:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be right but this information cant be added to a Wikipedia article as the information is un-encyclopedic.Thanks--Param Mudgal talk? 18:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Morrisons Undo

Hello Param Mudgal. Recently you undid my edit to Morrisons due to it being "non-constructive". With hindsight it may have not actually improved the article but I do not understand why it was marked as Vandalism as the information I put down was 100% correct and not intentionally non-constructive. Did you not know much about Morrisons so you thought it was vandalism or is it some other reason. I understand my edit might not have improved the article but I don't appreciate being labelled as a vandal when I was actually just trying to improve the article and the information was correct. I'm not nearly as expertised as you are but surely it should have been labelled as good-will rather than vandalism. If you did think what I put down was vandalism then maybe it would be good to check what your reviewing before making assumptions as I don't want to have a record of vandalism against me. I look forward to hearing your response.

Yours Faithfully, Lucyfurbear

Lucyfurbear (talk) 21:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

@Lucyfurbear:Hi Lucyfurbear, thank you for edits to Wikipedia.There were some problems with your edit to Morrisons.First of all you didn't add any edit summary.This is a major help to the fellow editors in classifying Good Faith and Bad Faith edits.For help see:Help:Edit summary.Secondly, you didnt add any reference.Even if you didnt add an edit summary then also if you had added a reference then i would had something to look at to.For help see WP:References.Thirdly, you added somewhat negative information about morrisons, this forced me to classify your edit as unconstructive.

I am sorry if your edits were unintentional and then also classified as vandalism.I also commit mistakes sometimes.Even administrators can commit mistakes sometimes.And one warning doesnt affect the Track Record of any editor.If multiple warnings are given then it can create problems for editors , it can also lead to Blockage of Account.I hope you have understood now that due to which circumstances i classified your edits as unconstructive.Thank you for asking me clarification about my decision.I will be happy enough to help you again soon.Anyway, Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 10:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry Param Mudgal. I realise my mistakes now and have started adding them to Wikipedia edits. I wasn't aware I was being negative but thanks for your help. My recent edits haven't been picked up by STiki yet so hopefully I'm doing something right! Yours Faithfully, Lucyfurbear Lucyfurbear (talk) 12:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

@Lucyfurbear:No problems.Please keep up your good work.Wikipedia needs editors like you.--Param Mudgal talk? 12:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Question

Ref: Created Journal page. Additional references and more content provided, please have a look at the draft journal page. Thanks.User:Rogen123

@Rogen123:Please provide a link to that Journal Page and please remember to sign your comment.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 10:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

@Param Mudgal:Param, thank you for your kind and prompt reply. The link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aging_and_Disease_%28Journal%29. I have added references and I hope it is sufficient for your approvalUser :User:Rogen123

@Rogen123: I am extremely sorry for the late reply.I was not present for wikipedia as i went for a vacation.Your draft has not yet been accepted as it needs to be expanded more and more Reliable , Independent sources needs to be added in the article.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 07:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

@Param Mudgal:Dear Param, thank you for your kind reply. Hope you had a good vacation. The article is expanded further and added notability by providing citation history in other professional journals as provided by Google Scholar Citation. The link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aging_and_Disease_%28Journal%29. I hope it is sufficient for your approvalUser :User:Rogen123

Congratulations from STiki!

The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar

Congratulations, Param Mudgal! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


Thank you very much for this Barnstar.I will continue to work for the betterment of Wikipedia.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 10:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Palaung undo

I'm afraid that there are no 'Reliable Sources' available to verify my comment. These are ethnic tribal people who do not generally use the internet and little is written about them. I am in almost daily contact with them here in Thailand. I do not speak their language but we do converse in Thai so i can only go by word of mouth. Fabianfred (talk) 20:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Fabianfred

@Fabianfred: Hi , I am afraid but Unsourced facts can't be added to Wikipedia.The information should be verifiable, Identified through Reliable, Independent Sources.If you can find the sources then you are welcome to add the information again.Meanwhile, you can help improving the quality of other articles present in Wikipedia.Thanks.

--Param Mudgal talk? 15:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Winged horses

None of the information on the page "List of winged horses" appears to have a reference, and I would like to know why my contribution, which was a factually correct, notable example, was singled out for deletion over the others.User:107.141.198.1

Hi,whenever you provide useful information in any wikipedia article then please cite reliable sources to support your information and in List Of Winged Horses it was already written that unsourced information must not be added in the article.I did'nt single out your information for deletion ,i just prevented more unsourced information being added into the article.I hope you have received the answer to your question and please sign your comment while adding it on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 06:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

hello

Im new here but i do 10 edits a day. I want Rollback rights do that i can use stiki. Thanks and regards, Magicsan (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

I can't do anything about this as I don't have the required permissions.Go to WP:PERM/R to request for the rights.If the administrators think you are capable enough to handle the responsibility then you will be granted the rights.Thanks.Param Mudgal talk? 17:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


thank you param, its nice to see indians too on wikipedia :-) Magicsan (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@Magicsan: There is no need to say thank you, It's my duty to help my fellow editors.And Indians are also major contributors in Wikipedia.If you have any other query I would be happy to help.Thanks.Param Mudgal talk? 15:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
ta-da Magicsan (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much.Param Mudgal talk? 16:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Deleting

You deleted a total paragraph in the European Debt Crisis article without mentioning what sentences you are opposing. With your bulk deleting method you and I could delelete many more paragraphs in this article, also in the lead, like vandalism. It would help you were more specific.--EconomicsEconomics (talk) 23:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

@EconomicsEconomics:I understand your problem but the information you added was unsourced.Wikipedia Articles need to have reliable sources.See : Referencing for help.If you need any more help then you are welcome to ask more questions on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 17:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

The "problem" here seems to be that you didn't understand the comment above (23:54, 14 December 2015), so let it be my fault I haven't explained it better.
My question was what part of the paragraph you deleted in bulk you think needs to be verified. As you can see, many paragraphs in the article are not sourced because much of their content may be common sense. Normally, before anyone does a bulk deleting, he has many constructive options, like to ask in the discussion about things that could be unclear, or to add a "verification needed" tag.
So, are you able to identify what you think needs to materially verified?
Or, do you think it is a good idea to just delete total paragraphs in that article as a more aggressive approach to ask for verifications. Do you think it is a good idea that right now I delete many more paragraphs in the article that don't have citations?--EconomicsEconomics (talk) 18:59, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

I completely Understood what you are trying to convey.I fully respect your opinion.The problem here is that the content which was added in previous revisions is very difficult to change completely.The content which has been added before can be made verifiable through the editors like us.As a responsible wikipedian if you , me or any other editor is aware of the fact that the present information is not verifiable or not cited through proper reliable sources then we should help in adding those reliable sources in the article.And as per the content which was reverted by me , it was reverted in Good Faith and as per my responsibility i can't allow more Unverifiable Information to be added inside an article, you only think that if all the wikipedia editors including me start allowing Unreferenced information inside the wikipedia Articles then the information presented through the wikipedia platform will be wrong and full of errors also.I once again clarify that this was not an aggressive approach against you, this was done so that you come back with an information which is identifiable with reliable sources and which is fully correct.I hope you understood my point.And thank you for asking me this question.If you have any question regarding this or you need help for any other issue i will be more than Happy To Help.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 19:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your answers still have nothing to do with my questions, so again:
1. You deleted about 130 words. Do you think each of the 130 words need to be verified, or are there certain material aspects that you think needs to be sourced as it is neither common knowledge nor explained by the context of the article?
2. Do you want that we immediately delete all paragraphs in that article that are not sourced ?
Additional question: You also reinstated the sentence "The detailed causes of the debt crisis varied [between the 5 countries]" without verifying that. Can you source that? Because I think that is not true.
Thank you for answering my questons (instead of repeating what I didn't ask).--EconomicsEconomics (talk) 20:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
And who are "editors like us"? Is that a special group of editors? Do they understand the "European Debt Crisis" article better than others? --EconomicsEconomics (talk) 16:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

@EconomicsEconomics:Hi, my answers were related to your questions only but let me explain to you again.Each wording doesn't need to be verified in Wikipedia.According to the community guidelines Inline Citations need to be added inside an article.For every information which is challenged or likely to be challenged should be cited through proper reliable sources.For help see:WP:Verifiability.As per your second question, the information which was added in the previous revisions need not be deleted (i have explained to you the reason above) instead you can help by adding reliable sources to the information which looks unsourced and the information which could be challenged or likely to be challenged.

And regarding the additional question which you have asked i would like you to start a discussion about the information which you think is not true on the talk page but first you should provide the reliable sources which can support your viewpoint.

And regarding your last question which you have misunderstood completely, From "Editors like us" i mean that the editors like you and me who are hard working and who constantly work to improve the Credibility and Worthiness of the Wikipedia Articles.I didn't mean a Special Group who could understand a particular article better.Infact , there are no Special Groups in Wikipedia.All the editors are equal under the Wikipedia Guidelines and all the editors work together for the betterment of the articles present inside Wikipedia.It's an honour to answer your questions and if you would like to ask anything more you are more than welcome to ask it on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 18:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Let me be blunt: Seeing your answers I feel you don't have the slightest idea about the "European Debt Crisis". It might be of advantage if you do only bulk deleting of paragraphs if you understand the issue of the article and the context of the sections you delete.
As you say yourself - the wikipedia community "can help adding reliable sources to information" - but not if some editors aggressively delete whole paragraphs of articles they have no idea about, they are not able to discuss about, and without giving others in the community reasonable time.
Last but not least: You reinstated the unsourced sentence "The detailed causes of the debt crisis varied [between the 5 countries]" and are thereby contradicting youself. --EconomicsEconomics (talk) 21:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


@EconomicsEconomics:First of all, you have added controversial information in the article without verifying it and there was no reason to believe that the information you have added is not an Original Research.You added information that "Greece masked its true deficit and debt level before 2001 to be admitted to the Euro"and other related information, you only tell me that why should i not delete this information which i don't know that it is correct or not as there are no reliable sources proving it.These can also be your personal views which you have added in the article.You have added controversial information about Greece which is negative in context which is also a critical information which can be challenged easily.Instead of blaming me for removing the content you could instead add your information with Reliable Sources to prove your point.And i want to tell you that it is my duty to revert the content which can challenge the Credibility and the Quality of the Articles.As i have told you before if you think that a wrong sentence has been added inside the article which needs to be removed you can remove that while providing Reliable Sources which can support your removal.By now, you should understand that unsourced information is generally not accepted inside Wikipedia.If you have any more questions, i will be happy to answer them also.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 07:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Param_Mudgal/Archive_1&oldid=1078054985"