User talk:Avikbasu
Welcome!
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Reasonable Person Model (October 30)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reasonable Person Model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Avikbasu,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Param Mudgal talk? 12:26, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Reasonable Person Model has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Libby norman (talk) 12:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reasonable Person Model
[edit]Hi there, just to let you know that I have passed this article. I'm not a subject specialist, but all articles on Wikipedia should be relevant to a general audience. You'll note that I've removed quite a lot of material as it seemed to stray from the article title and perhaps, at times, moved into argument rather than description of a theory. I've also taken off all the notes embedded in the text – these made it very difficult to review and I trust you will be able to retrieve them from earlier versions or other sources should you wish to develop the article further. This article is likely to be scrutinised by subject specialists, but hopefully the references you supplied (many of which I can't check) will stand up. Many thanks for your contribution. Libby norman (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Reasonable Person Model Diagram 2.png listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reasonable Person Model Diagram 2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Beland (talk) 02:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)