User talk:Aditya soni

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Aditya soni! I am X! and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! X! who used to be Soxred93 03:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Commoner's Barnstar
	Awarding you this barnstar for your contributions in Indian Astrology by creating many articles Shrikanthv (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Re: Paramananda - well done. If I may make a suggestion: Try to keep the first sentence of the intro on your pages shorter (this one is 75 words) to help those who may wish to learn more about the subject. And for style. I was going to edit it and may do so, but only if asked.

I do understand.--Zananiri (talk) 12:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tajjalan

The article Tajjalan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary and does not include neologisms

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mono 05:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note

If you have not seen it already, have a look at Yoga and the ongoing discussion about its pronunciation in the last section its Talk page. Perhaps you can add something!--Zananiri (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adarsana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adarsana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adarsana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. IRWolfie- (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe guidelines

Please read these guidelines WP:FRINGE, and this policy WP:PSCI. When you make statements about the world which are from your belief system the text should make that clear. For example, your changes to Dasha make statements of fact which are actually part of a specific belief system. Also be careful not to make medical claims sourced to unreliable sources. On wikipedia we look to the medical literature, not traditional beliefs for statements of medically relevant details. If you are making claims based on some folklore/pseudoscience, the context should make that clear, always put any pseudoscientific/folk beliefs into context with the mainstream. See WP:MEDRS for more information. Good luck, IRWolfie- (talk) 14:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at the Astrology article for a good example of general treatment of these topics, IRWolfie- (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Aditya soni, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! JustBerry (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sankalpa (Hindu thought)

Hi, I'm Kieranian2001. Aditya soni, thanks for creating Sankalpa (Hindu thought)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Reviewed as part of page curation, interesting referenced article on philosophy, presently an orphan as needs links from other pages.Kieranian2001 (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kieranian2001 (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adrishta

		The Hinduism Award
		Dear Aditya, please accept my warm congratulations for your superb article on Adrishta. Best regards, - TwoHorned _{User_talk:TwoHorned} 05:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Mauna (silence) was accepted

Mauna (silence), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 08:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trikasthanas (astrology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trikasthanas (astrology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trikasthanas (astrology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 22:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reka yoga (astrology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reka yoga (astrology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reka yoga (astrology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Unmaad yoga (astrology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unmaad yoga (astrology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unmaad yoga (astrology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 11:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Equal house system (Hindu astrology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Equal house system (Hindu astrology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equal house system (Hindu astrology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Second Quantization (talk) 12:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

Hello, Aditya soni. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -Location (talk) 14:38, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

Hello, Aditya soni. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -Location (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-Ad Orientem (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop for a breath and understand that, for good or for bad reasons, your work is being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Propose_a_Topic-Ban_on_New_Articles_in_Article_Space where there is a proposal to make you work in a very different manner. It is important that you participate in these discussions and do so well, calmly and in a manner that shows that you understand how Wikipedia's community works.

You seem to be an expert in Hindu scholarly matters. That is great. However, your articles are giving cause for some concern. You need, please, to work with us, or all your work will be wasted. This includes engaging people in conversations. It includes explaining things in detail, and not only to those who will understand. Those who do not understand are very important, too. Fiddle Faddle 21:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Your contribution to the discussion has been important. I cannot predict the outcome, and I hope it does not cause you difficulties. Fiddle Faddle 07:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I respect your desire to leave. Under pressure like this anyone would wish to leave. This is a continuing unpleasantness for you and is horrible. I am simply asking you to take a period of quiet reflection, allow the dust to settle wherever it settles, and then, once all is quiet, to consider whether you have, as I believe you have, much value to add to Wikipedia and the area you specialise in, or whether you still wish to leave.

I hope you will wish to stay.

If you decide to stay I will give you such help as I am able so that you can understand the ways of Wikipedia better. I am sure others will do the same.

If you decide to leave I will be disappointed, but I will wish you well. Fiddle Faddle 09:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My dear Timtrent or Fiddle Faddle (I cannot help addressing you as my dear), But for you I would not have elected to respond. You are prepared to help me but there is no one else who is likely to follow suit. A tiger cannot change its stripes, this you know. When you insisted upon my participation in the ongoing discussion I thought I would be meeting people possessing a higher level of intellectual development and maturity than I had managed to acquire. It is before you, you unwittingly threw me instead before those who you know what. I am not complaining. But I am reminded of the very ancient adage which directs that the highest kind of knowledge should be passed on only to those who deserve it; this holy instruction I have indeed disobeyed by posting the 160 odd articles besides rewriting many other articles. I have committed a serious crime. I deserve to be punished. But, I do not want you to become my accomplice. I have no intention of returning to Wikipedia even though I have already in hand nineteen finely honed missing topics to post. I have now decided to send them in essay forms to magazines which will readily publish them. That I am disappointing you it pains me equally. I do not know where you live and work but I would like to keep in touch with you. Enjoy life by living it truly. Regards.

P.S. After seeking retirement from Wikipedia am I supposed to delete the User page and the talk page, if so can you suggest how to do that? But, now on I shall not be watching this talk page or user page or the pages I had created or revised save for this suggestion sought from you.Aditya soni (talk) 15:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may blank, or request the deletion of, your own user space pages. I can understand why you wish to do so. I wish you would stay, even as an observer, but I have said I respect your decision, and wish you well, and I stand by it. I feel we are the poorer for your leaving. That is our problem, not yours.

I feel you have been mistreated and that we owe you an apology. For any hurt I have caused you I apologise freely.

I wish you did not feel you had been thrown before enemies. Wikipedia suffers from the Wisdom of Crowds. Unfortunately this can manifest itself as lynch law. People complained that you would not engage in discussion. I wonder if anyone ever let you know that discussion is important to Wikipedia. I doubt it. I find you easy to engage in conversation. I wish we had met under different circumstances.

If you stay I will most assuredly help you. I will help you as a guide, as a sounding board. I will offer opinions which may even be incorrect. I am human.

You have seen WIkipedia at its worst. I hope you will allow it to show you its best. Fiddle Faddle 17:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping you return after a deserved rest

I thank you for your contribution. I only came across your articles recently because of the discussions referenced above. I know little enough of Hindu philosophy and theology and hope to benefit by reading more about them. I have seen some evidence in the discussions to indicate that some are willing to approach the majority of your articles with a view to improvement rather than deletion. I hope that this will come to pass and I also hope that after time to recuperate and reflect, you choose to return and share more knowledge with this flawed but mostly well-meaning community. Peace. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 15:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 24.151.10.165 (talk) I am pleased to note your interest in Hindu philosophy and theology. On the question "Whether Hindu astrology is a science or not?" - The Supreme Court of India had in 2004 ruled that Astrology is a science through its order in the Case No. Appeal (civil) 5886 of 2002 P.M.Bhargava & Others. Vs. University Grants Commission and Another. Supreme Court of India had delivered its judgment in this case on 05/05/2004 which was later officially published through the Supreme Court of India – Judgement Information System ( http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=26188 ) I am drawing your attention to the detailed order of the Court; even if this judgement does not appeal to you but do study the order. Astrology has been a part of Indian Culture for past 4000 years; and you know that even those who publically oppose astrology have abundant faith in it. And, in India it is legally considered as a science. Since you took the trouble to contact me and console me I thought I should respond by passing on to you a valuable information not known to many. I have noted your concern. Regards.Aditya soni (talk) 08:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had read mention of this decision, but it was interesting to read the reasoning of the court, so I thank you very much for the link. I found the reasoning of the Madras High Court (quoted approvingly) particularly apt for an encyclopedia: it had "held that the very purpose of imparting education is to gain knowledge and therefore there should be every scope for making a study on very many subjects in order to enrich ones craving for knowledge. Any such attempt from any quarters in furtherance of that pursuit should not be stultified. The learned Judge further held that it was for the pupil concerned to select any particular field or subject in furtherance of his future career, and merely because the subject has got its basis or origin traceable to some cult, it cannot be held that the same would only result in propagation of a particular religion." I also noted your recent comment at AN/I that you are willing to "re-write and if possible simplify" articles. While no one could expect you to do so to all articles at once and while I decry the way you got dragged to AN/I, I think it would go far to persuade others if you were willing to edit one or two articles to more neutrally present Hindu beliefs, as beliefs rather than as universal truths (while fully recognizing that for believers these are truths, just as other beliefs are truths for other religions). What I have in mind is small changes of the sort I attempted at Rasasvada so that beliefs are stated "for Hindus" and so that scholars are instructing "followers" rather than "us". I can certainly understand if you are not up to such editing yet, but I think doing so would be the strongest sort of evidence that you are willing to collaboratively present the knowledge you possess in a form the community can appreciate. Best. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 14:14, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I commend 24's approach to you. It is gentle, pragmatic, and starts to solve the issues that others have decided exist. Fiddle Faddle 16:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devatas (Vedanta) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devatas (Vedanta) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devatas (Vedanta) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Char Dham (Vedic) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Char Dham (Vedic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Char Dham (Vedic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:36, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving existing articles into user space

Namaste!

Let's begin by getting your articles out of mainspace, where they are under threat of being deleted, and into userspace, where we may work on them.

I've created one already: User:Aditya soni/WorkinProgress/Char Dham (Vedic)

Here's the process:

Create the page in userspace. 1a. In the searchbox at top right, enter "User:Aditya soni/WorkinProgress/"and "xxx" (replace "xxx" with the name of the article you are moving). Let's say it's Unmaad_yoga_(astrology). Enter ""User:Aditya soni/WorkinProgress/Unmaad_yoga_(astrology)" 1b. Hit return, and you'll get a blank edit page. Leave it for now.
Open another tab in your browser.
Go to the article you wish to move. (in this case, Unmaad_yoga_(astrology))
Press the "Edit" tab at the top.
Select all the text in the edit box. Copy it.
Go back to the blank edit page from step 1b.
Paste in the text from step 5.
If the article is being considered for deletion, remove the first few lines with the deletion tag.
Also remove the last few lines (listing the categories)
Save the page.
We now have a copy of the article which we can work on to improve. Even if the original is deleted before it can be improved, we can always restore it when it is ready.

Repeat for each of the hundred or so articles you have created.

We can get administrator assistance to recover the text of those articles already deleted, so they are not lost.

Let me know if you have any questions on the process. --Pete (talk) 03:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pete, you are a great help. I only wish some one like you had similarly guided me earlier. I proceeded to create pages without understanding WP requirements. But brother, understanding all rules and norms is beyond me. To start with I have reworked on User:Aditya soni/WorkinProgress/Char Dham (Vedic) which is under threat of deletion, after moving it to User:Aditya soni/WorkinProgress/Four Vedic Dhams so as to avoid confusion with Char Dham that already exists. Do examine my re-working and let me have your opinion. Presently, not all articles are under threat. I have copied all articles on my desk top to work upon if need be. Because some of the articles have recently been reviewed and may be being reviewed, I plan to work on these one by one in case they are threatened.Aditya soni (talk) 06:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samanadhikaranyam (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samanadhikaranyam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— CutestPenguin^Hangout 06:21, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Samanadhikaranyam

A tag has been placed on Draft:Samanadhikaranyam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The article already exist in the mainspace at Samanadhikaranya.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 17:46, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panchashikha has been accepted

Panchashikha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mashafi has been accepted

Mashafi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Udgitha and Shraddha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Titiksha has been accepted

Titiksha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhatta Narayana has been accepted

Bhatta Narayana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anuvyavasaya has been accepted

Anuvyavasaya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dvadasaha has been accepted

Dvadasaha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Param Mudgal ^talk? 09:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Aditya soni. You have new messages at Param Mudgal's talk page.
Message added 11:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Param Mudgal ^talk? 11:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhutaparikalpa (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhutaparikalpa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Param Mudgal ^talk? 11:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karakamsa (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Param Mudgal ^talk? 11:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See ANI

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Dozens_of_drafts_copypasted_into_article_space It is being addressed.--S Philbrick (Talk) 14:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Aditya soni. You have new messages at Param Mudgal's talk page.
Message added 19:50, 1 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Param Mudgal ^talk? 19:50, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhutaparikalpa (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.

The reason left by Param Mudgal was:

Please consider adding a lead section in this draft,after that your draft will be re-reviewed.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhutaparikalpa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Param Mudgal ^talk? 20:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karakamsa (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Param Mudgal was:

Again, please consider adding a lead section in this draft. After that it will be re-reviewed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karakamsa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Param Mudgal ^talk? 20:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pranapada has been accepted

Pranapada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhutaparikalpa has been accepted

Abhutaparikalpa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:52, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratiyogitvam has been accepted

Pratiyogitvam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— CutestPenguin^Hangout 15:29, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhumika has been accepted

Bhumika, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ThaddeusB (talk) 16:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pravahana Jaivali has been accepted

Pravahana Jaivali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris Troutman (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viprata (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Viprata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald : here I am 16:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anvaya (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Viprata has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Viprata. Thanks! The Herald : here I am 13:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anvaya (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This draft is entirely too complex. The purpose of Wikipedia is to offer knowledge to the masses. At the moment, only a scholar of Hindu philosophy would be able to understand the context of this draft. Rewriting the draft in your own words (and not simply paraphrasing from the textbooks) will greatly help in this.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anvaya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 00:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vichara, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mañana and Shraddha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Sahib"

You recently called me "Huon Sahib" on my talk page. That mode of address would be appropriate only as a jocular reference to my fictional namesake, King-Emperor Huon - as Wikipedia editors we're all equal, and there's no need to call another editor "sahib" - not me, not the members of ArbCom, not Jimmy Wales himself. Huon (talk) 17:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huon Saheb, no offence meant, for I was not aware of your fictional namesake. But all the same, I have found your objection and clarification cuter than the very cute silhouette of yours of the time when you were a tiny, naughty and chipper kid that I have happened to notice just now. You see, I was born and brought up in Delhi in a very cultured literary upper-class environment and taught to be respectful towards each and all; my respectful address is a part of myself being respectful toward others. I guess, habits die hard. I cannot change my old habits, therefore, please bear with me. Regards.Aditya soni (talk) 02:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aropya has been accepted

Aropya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 15:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shadurmi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sloka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vibodha has been accepted

Vibodha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~KvnG 18:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jijnasa (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mr. Guye was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jijnasa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mr. Guye (talk) 03:48, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prayatna (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mr. Guye was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prayatna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mr. Guye (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pratibandhaka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anvaya has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anvaya. Thanks! Mahensingha (talk) 17:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anvaya has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anvaya. Thanks! Mahensingha (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anvaya (Indian logic) has been accepted

Anvaya (Indian logic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mahensingha (talk) 11:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anubhuti (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Visayah has been accepted

Visayah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 21:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panchagni Vidya has been accepted

Panchagni Vidya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

BenLinus 1214^talk 21:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhānumati has been accepted

Bhānumati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mahensingha _Talk 19:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ignis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viprata has been accepted

Viprata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 16:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prayatna has been accepted

Prayatna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 20:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jijnasa has been accepted

Jijnasa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 22:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atma bodha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil and Avidya. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jatismara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agama. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Chidakasha

Hi, I'm Fiachra10003. Aditya soni, thanks for creating Chidakasha!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi - I very much like your articles but it might be helpful to write an introductory paragraph to the article explaining it in context for those of us with no prior knowledge of Hinduism

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Fiachra10003 (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mardava) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mardava, Aditya soni!

Wikipedia editor The Average Wikipedian just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please put more weight on the meaning or how to put Mardava in practice in Hinduism instead of just listing the other astopayas. Also, for example, give examples of ways it is achieved in different religions to make it less like a dictionary.

To reply, leave a comment on The Average Wikipedian's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Para Vidya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Absolute and Angiras. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

meow

Thanks for Asraya

Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asraya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Monadic and Dhātu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

Thanks for your contributions to Parijata chsh (talk) 15:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Karakamsa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Karakamsa, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Karakamsa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Karakamsa, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vaidyanatha Dikshita for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vaidyanatha Dikshita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaidyanatha Dikshita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 18:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chamatkara Chintamani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chamatkara Chintamani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamatkara Chintamani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Svena

The article Svena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a rarely used Sanskrit philosophical word used in a few phrases. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pārijāta yoga

The article Pārijāta yoga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a rarely used term without significant coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pashyanti

The article Pashyanti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A dictionary term without significant coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 18:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pārijāta yoga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pārijāta yoga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pārijāta yoga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 06:15, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pashyanti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pashyanti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pashyanti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 06:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vibodha

The article Vibodha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are online dictionaries or books on special topics.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 07:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aropya

The article Aropya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are online dictionaries or books on special topics. Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 08:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sankalpa

The article Sankalpa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are online dictionaries or special interest books on specialized topics. Article also violates WP:FRINGE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 08:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neechabhanga Raja yoga

The article Neechabhanga Raja yoga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are books on specialized topics. Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 08:57, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brahmi sthiti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brahmi sthiti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahmi sthiti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 11:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sankalpa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sankalpa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankalpa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 08:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shashtiamsa

The article Shashtiamsa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of coverage in general media, Fails WP:GNG. Terminology from Fringe topic and Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are books on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 08:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Viparyaya

The article Viparyaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, due to lack of coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are dictionary or books on specialized fringe topics and only have passing mentions of the word.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pranapada

The article Pranapada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in general media. Terminology from Fringe topic and violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are books on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Article makes claims about human nature and physiology violating WP:MEDRS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vibodha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vibodha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vibodha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kemadruma yoga

The article Kemadruma yoga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in general media. This is a term from Fringe topic and violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given source is book on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Article makes claims about human nature and physiology violating WP:MEDRS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 10:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dvādaśānta

The article Dvādaśānta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due Lack of coverage in independent general media. Terminology from Fringe topic and Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are books on WP:FRINGE theory (pseudoscience WP:PSCI).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 07:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Divya-drishti

The article Divya-drishti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in general media. Terminology from Fringe topic and violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are books on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Article makes claims about human nature and physiology violating WP:MEDRS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 07:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jatismara

The article Jatismara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in general media. Terminology from Fringe topic and violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are books on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Article makes claims about human nature and physiology violating WP:MEDRS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 07:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viparyaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viparyaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viparyaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 06:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pratibandhaka

The article Pratibandhaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, due to lack of coverage in general media. Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are dictionary or books on specialized fringe topics and only have passing mentions of the word. Article makes claims about human immunity referring to WP:PSCI (pseudoscience) sources violating WP:MEDRS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shadurmi

The article Shadurmi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Concept proposed by one author. Fails WP:GNG, due to lack of coverage in general media. Given sources are dictionary or books on specialized fringe topics and only have passing mentions of the word.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 10:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garbhadhan (astrology)

The article Garbhadhan (astrology) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in general media. Terminology from Fringe topic and violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Given sources are books on fringe theory (pseudoscience). Article also violates WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI. Article makes claims about pregnancy and human physiology violating WP:MEDRS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 10:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madhu-vidya

The article Madhu-vidya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in general media. Given sources only give passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 10:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vibodha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vibodha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://eng.ichacha.net/zaoju/vibodha.html and https://eng.ichacha.net/zaoju/nididhyasana.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Largoplazo (talk) 23:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shashtiamsa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shashtiamsa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://parasharaonline.blogspot.com/2011/08/chapter-6-sixteen-divisions-of-sign.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Venkat TL (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Divya-drishti

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Divya-drishti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.co.in/books?id=n7XOnIkBQ0QC&q=divya-drishti&pg=PA162&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=divya%20drishti&f=false and https://books.google.co.in/books?id=OSeNBQAAQBAJ&q=divya-drishti&pg=PA17&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=divya-drishti&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Venkat TL (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laghu Parashari

The article Laghu Parashari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the notability criteria of WP:NBOOKS. No mainstream source covers the topic. Only sources are WP:FRINGE books that are not considered reliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 08:37, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 22:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See [1]. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 22:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Punāna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Punāna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punāna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madhu-vidya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madhu-vidya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhu-vidya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 06:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anubhava copyvio note

Copyright problem: Anubhava

Hello Aditya soni! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Anubhava, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Dattatreya_Ramachandra_Bendre_Ambikatana/QaSWBH68NQYC?q=anubhava&gbpv=1#f=false https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_Limits_of_Scripture/b9EJBQG3zqUC?q=anubhava&gbpv=1#f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=7Wd_BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA220&dq=anubhava&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5z_HVOLFFeihmQWS_IKoDg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=anubhava&f=false https://www.google.com/books/edition/Theatre_and_Consciousness/zGy0UglRz6IC?q=anubhava&gbpv=1#f=false and possibly more, even formatting copied, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Anubhava and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Anubhava, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Anubhava. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Anubhava with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Anubhava saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Hemanthah (talk) 16:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amanaskata

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amanaskata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.google.co.in/search?q=alert+state+of+dynamic+fullness+of+the+self&hl=en&tbm=bks, https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Yoga/zMrtAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=amanaskata&dq=amanaskata&printsec=frontcover, and https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Meditation_and_Mantras/JgnTT0eqwIoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=laya%20chintana&pg=PA122. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hemanthah (talk) 08:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skanda Hora for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skanda Hora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skanda Hora until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Garbhadhan (astrology) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garbhadhan (astrology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garbhadhan (astrology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 11:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adhikārivāda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adhikārivāda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhikārivāda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bandhana yoga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bandhana yoga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandhana yoga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 09:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kemadruma yoga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kemadruma yoga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kemadruma yoga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Venkat TL (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jataka Bharanam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jataka Bharanam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jataka Bharanam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Venkat TL (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jataka Bharanam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jataka Bharanam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://jyotishbooks.wordpress.com/2018/10/13/dhundirajs-jataka-bharna-classic-hindi-by-surya-narayan-sidhanti/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarvatobhadra Chakra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarvatobhadra Chakra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from tasticgasw.weebly.com/sarvatobhadra-chakra.html and https://shinshinri.tistory.com/21. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Venkat TL (talk) 12:12, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]