User talk:Kim Macdonald

Your submission at Articles for creation: EPACT Network (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EPACT Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

st170e^talk 16:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kim Macdonald, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! st170e^talk 16:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kim Macdonald. You have new messages at St170e's talk page.
Message added 22:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

st170e^talk 22:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks much for the offer re: commenting - would be great to have you add a comment to the article if you could and I'll do another review to ensure promotional content is fully addressed. re: suggested reading for Company overview, felt like I did provide a lot of national and regional references to show it as notable, as ePACT has gotten some good coverage over the last few years, but maybe it wasn't enough. Will look at that again for sure too. Thanks for the help...hoping to do some more articles on some other co's I've been following in our tech scene, so working to get better at this asap! :)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EPACT Network (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lor was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EPACT Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lor^Chat 05:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:EPACT Network has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:EPACT Network. Thanks! Param Mudgal ^talk? 08:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Param Mudgal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to EPACT Network because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please provide useful edits in this article.Refrain from removing references without providing any edit summary.Provide edit summary after every edit. Param Mudgal ^talk? 15:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:EPACT Network concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:EPACT Network, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EPACT Network

Hello, Kim Macdonald. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "EPACT Network".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:EPACT Network}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]