User talk:OOODDD

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any threads with no replies in 14 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. An archive index is available here.

February 2012

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your rights to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mnbvcxz listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mnbvcxz. Since you had some involvement with the Mnbvcxz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Perfect Roommate

The article The Perfect Roommate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced and no obvious reliable sources in Google. The movie poster has been uploaded and deleted multiple times from commons. Three of six cast links are very dubious. Most edits have been by IP(s).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Perfect Roommate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Perfect Roommate, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunlight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sunlight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lily allen smile listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lily allen smile. Since you had some involvement with the Lily allen smile redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Psychonaut (talk) 08:07, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tallest nashville listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tallest nashville. Since you had some involvement with the Tallest nashville redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Psychonaut (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tallest philadelphia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tallest philadelphia. Since you had some involvement with the Tallest philadelphia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Psychonaut (talk) 08:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Projects by Van Oord

Category:Projects by Van Oord, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AG Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AG Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AG Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 23:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Get laid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Get laid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BirdbrainedPhoenix (talk) 04:32, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request to take part in a survey

I am Piotr Konieczny, a fellow Wikipedian (User:Piotrus) and a researcher of Wikipedia (http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEAAAAJ). I am currently (in collaboration with WMF) embarking on a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. We have a growing understanding of why an average editor may do so (see http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Former_Contributors_Survey_Results), but we have a very limited understanding of why the top editors would limit their contributions. Yet it is the top editors like yourself who contribute most of Wikiepdia's content, thus understanding this is of vital concern to Wikipedia's project future.

I am contacting you because you are among the top Wikipediana by number of edits, yet your editing activity shows a decline. I would very much appreciate if you would take a minute and answer the following four short questions. Please note this is not a mass email; I am contacting only few dozen of editors like yourself, and each response is extremely valuable. Your response will not be made public, and your privacy will be fully respected.

If you would like to help out in this project and take part in a very short survey, please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you have the opportunity to consider my request? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

County Clare (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect County Clare (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the County Clare (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Fiddle Faddle 13:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1930 olympics

A tag has been placed on 1930 olympics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AnnieLennoxWhy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AnnieLennoxWhy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abjar Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abjar Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abjar Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ELEKHH^T 04:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Egos and Icons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egos and Icons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egos and Icons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mariah Yeater listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mariah Yeater. Since you had some involvement with the Mariah Yeater redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Theosophist (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marina Quays West

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marina Quays West requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 07:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marina Quays West

The article Marina Quays West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence at all of notability, in while or in part

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 00:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pussy shit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pussy shit. Since you had some involvement with the Pussy shit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pussy shit

Hello OOODDD,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pussy shit for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Louieoddie (talk) 10:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

El lay listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect El lay. Since you had some involvement with the El lay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 04:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Days Go By (Not by Choice song)

The article Days Go By (Not by Choice song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:02, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Standing All Alone

The article Standing All Alone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BoysOfSummer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BoysOfSummer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Le Volume Était Au Maximum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Le Volume Était Au Maximum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Volume Était Au Maximum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 21:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Armoured personal unit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Armoured personal unit. Since you had some involvement with the Armoured personal unit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ARY Digital Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ARY Digital Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARY Digital Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 12:44, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Signalrunners for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signalrunners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signalrunners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. aNode (discuss) 09:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pickle fucker listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pickle fucker. Since you had some involvement with the Pickle fucker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crackbook listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Crackbook. Since you had some involvement with the Crackbook redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:52, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nadya Angelina Jolie Suleman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nadya Angelina Jolie Suleman. Since you had some involvement with the Nadya Angelina Jolie Suleman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Plantdrew (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand Millennium Plaza II

The article Grand Millennium Plaza II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable topic created by account which has since been blocked

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 23:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paul mc cartney listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul mc cartney. Since you had some involvement with the Paul mc cartney redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 04:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Providence Tower, Dubai

The article Providence Tower, Dubai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never got past the planning stage, will never be built

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 00:04, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:IAGPTOSR.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:IAGPTOSR.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lkjhgfdsa" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lkjhgfdsa. Since you had some involvement with the Lkjhgfdsa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of V3 Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article V3 Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V3 Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 04:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AG Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AG Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AG Tower (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 09:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest calgary" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest calgary. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest calgary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest atlanta" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest atlanta. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest atlanta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest vancouver" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest vancouver. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest vancouver until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest tokyo" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest tokyo. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest tokyo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest toronto" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest toronto. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest toronto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest berlin" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest berlin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest berlin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest dubai" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest dubai. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest dubai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest tehran" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest tehran. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest tehran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest dallas" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest dallas. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest dallas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest detroit" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest detroit. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest detroit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest chicago" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest chicago. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest chicago until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest seattle" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest seattle. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest seattle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest london" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest london. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest london until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest houston" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest houston. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest houston until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest new york" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest new york. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest new york until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest montreal" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest montreal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest montreal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest michigan" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest michigan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest michigan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest miami" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest miami. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest miami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest beijing" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest beijing. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest beijing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest ottawa" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest ottawa. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest ottawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest paris" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest paris. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest paris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest shanghai" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest shanghai. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 1#Tallest shanghai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 23:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest new york city" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest new york city. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 1#Tallest new york city until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 23:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest los angeles" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest los angeles. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 1#Tallest los angeles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 23:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Land O'Lakes (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Talk:Land O'Lakes (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This is a request to speedy-delete the talk page, not the redirect. The talkpage merely had a disambig template because it originally was not a redirect; I removed this as it is no longer relevant.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — the Man in Question (in question) 07:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest kuala lumpur" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest kuala lumpur. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16#Tallest kuala lumpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 01:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest hong kong" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest hong kong. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16#Tallest hong kong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Bush era" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bush era. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 21#Bush era until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 16:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Binary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Binary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Binary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

🌀Locomotive207-talk 🌀 (Formerly Kieran207) 00:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Chair (film)

The article The Chair (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 14:58, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Other Half 2006.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Other Half 2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Etisalat Tower 1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Etisalat Tower 1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etisalat Tower 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MarkTHE19 (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Drive one" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Drive one and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 10#Drive one until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 00:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Not by Choice songs

A tag has been placed on Category:Not by Choice songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Gaysex" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gaysex and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 24#Gaysex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Capsulecap ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linewatch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linewatch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linewatch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 23:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Gaynal" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gaynal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 17#Gaynal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Shagos" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Shagos and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 17#Shagos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pornstar Académie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pornstar Académie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornstar Académie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 05:43, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of W. Erskine Johnston Public School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W. Erskine Johnston Public School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W. Erskine Johnston Public School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 22:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kresge Hearing Research Institute faculty

A tag has been placed on Category:Kresge Hearing Research Institute faculty indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Loaded (2008 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loaded (2008 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loaded (2008 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Film Creator (talk) 18:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Bryce Wylde" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bryce Wylde has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 29 § Bryce Wylde until a consensus is reached. Bearcat (talk) 12:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2008 West Palm Beach Wendy's shooting

Hello, OOODDD. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2008 West Palm Beach Wendy's shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Sheffield Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sheffield Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sheffield Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 06:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jimmy the Greek (restaurant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy the Greek (restaurant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy the Greek (restaurant) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

747pilot (talk) 20:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nili Tower

The article Nili Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find enough sources to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Dubai Islamic Bank Tower

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Vlad putin" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Vlad putin has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24 § Vlad putin until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2008 West Palm Beach Wendy's shooting

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2008 West Palm Beach Wendy's shooting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 West Palm Beach Wendy's shooting. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Lezlo" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lezlo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 1 § Lezlo until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 06:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

???

carw 2A02:C7C:8609:FF00:C5C9:F5D6:10A1:9F27 (talk) 19:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@carwayis shareware and it seems the best thing that I was thinking if you want w 2A02:C7C:8609:FF00:C5C9:F5D6:10A1:9F27 (talk) 19:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2008 Swat Valley bombing

The article 2008 Swat Valley bombing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One source provided is from time of event. No lasting impact or coverage to meet WP:EVENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2008 West Palm Beach Wendy's shooting

Hello, OOODDD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2008 West Palm Beach Wendy's shooting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Million;s Poet" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Million;s Poet has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 27 § Million;s Poet until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2008 Dubai explosion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008 Dubai explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Dubai explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2008 Egyptian bus accident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008 Egyptian bus accident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Egyptian bus accident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]