User talk:Nuklear

Sometimes the sandbox is a good place to work if you are going to be making multiple revisions. Just a helpful suggestion. BierHerr 19:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Nuklear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Bk0 (Talk) 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Carfentanil

Hi, Nuklear.

I've moved the comment you added to the main article to its Talk page, below your first comment. You can read my reply there.

Thanks, --Bk0 (Talk) 01:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bohmefent.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bohmefent.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:OMF.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:OMF.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:14, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Fluorogesic.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Fluorogesic.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Lednicer.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Lednicer.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:OMF2.png listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:OMF2.png has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – riana_dzasta 12:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't reupload Image:OMF2.png under a restricted license, as it will be speedily deleted again. Consider using the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See WP:COPYREQ for more information. Thanks, – riana_dzasta 13:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ohmefentanyl, you will be blocked from editing. Jeepday 05:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC) ([reply]

License tagging for Image:TropSynth.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:TropSynth.GIF. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging: warning

Since you did not react to the above messages, be advised that you have 24 hours as of this message to appy correct source information and licence tags to the abovementioned images, as well as to all other images uploaded by you, or they will be speedily deleted and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia for persistent copyright violations. Sandstein 15:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OMF2.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OMF2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JulesH 17:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M82188b5b24662f4448048bjz1.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:M82188b5b24662f4448048bjz1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tail.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tail.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 18:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also listed for deletion are Image:Ohmefentany1.gif, Image:3-methyl-fentanyl.gif, Image:Fluorotanyl.gif, Image:Fluorogesic.gif, Image:Dipipanone.png. If you can put these on proper pages, go for it. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 19:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phenyltropane article

Please don't remove dispute/cleanup tags from articles, as you did to Phenyltropane, without first addressing/discussing the concerns on the talk page. Thanks! -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 20:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phenyltropane

This article seems to veer way off course in the background section, where the following text was added:

BZ is a popular nonlethal incapacitating agent among the military, a man-made muscarinic that can be used in armed combat scenarios to wipeout the enemy. It is not harmful enough to secure a fatality, whereas deadly nightshade is more insidious.Epibatidine though, is outright lethal.

Firstly, the article is about phenyltropane, not chemical weapons. None of the above text seems to relate to this article at all. Also the Deadly nightshade article and the Epibatidine article both fail to mention anything about their use as a weapon. Immediately below the above text, the format of the line with the external link is overlinked (see:MoS:L), with internal links to completely non-related articles. It is not apparent how the external link supports any of the contents of this article. If it does indeed support the article, it ought to be used as a reference, by tagging it as such. Jerry 00:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diphenylmethoxytropine

Please either have that page deleted or complete it. The New Mikemoral 23:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Fencamfamine.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Fencamfamine.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Nocaine.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Nocaine.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Junkey.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Junkey.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Phenylpiperidinol

Message posted on Thursday, May 10, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Phenylpiperidinol. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.freepatentsonline.com/EP1315493.html in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Phenylpiperidinol with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the iWikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Phenylpiperidinol with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Phenylpiperidinol saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

~Matticus ^T_C 08:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ohmefentanyl

Please stop adding nonsense, WP:POV and WP:OR to the article. You fail to use the article talk page and edit summary and continuously add and remove content with no explanation... some of which is looks like vandalism and total nonsense such as "The number of patients successfully euthanized during clinical evaluations was very encouraging". The statement could have very specific scientific explanation but since the article is nothing more than a list of statements, the reader has no idea what the relevance is to the rest of the article. -- I already forgot talk 19:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reply to your edit to my user page: "Please stop sabbotaging my OMf page." The ohmefentanyl page is not your personal page. You have made many contributions to the article but you have also made it completely unencylcopedic now. You have indicated that you try to test wikipedia boundaries and it looks like you are now testing the boundaries again...please stop. I also ask that you only leave comments on my talk page. Thanks.-- I already forgot talk 20:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Ohmefentanyl

Message posted on Monday, May 14, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Ohmefentanyl. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://64.233.179.104/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:JdH1XQ5KqeoJ:www.shd.org.yu/HtDocs/SHD/Vol69/No11/V69-No11-02.pdf , http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/292/3/1127?ck=nck , http://www.chinaphar.com/1671-4083/24/1253.htm in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ohmefentanyl with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Ohmefentanyl with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Ohmefentanyl saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

I already forgot talk 06:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Fenmodeling

Message posted on Monday, May 14, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Fenmodeling. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.doiserbia.nbs.bg.ac.yu/img/doi/0352-5139/2004/0352-51390411843D.pdf in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Fenmodeling with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Fenmodeling with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Fenmodeling saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

I already forgot talk 07:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary Request

I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 18:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images nominated for deletion

I have nominated some of the images you have uploaded for deletion, because of doubts about their copyright status and since they are currently unused (only used in a deleted article). Please have a look at images for deletion for more details, and feel free to comment if you don't weant them to be deleted. Regards, Mike Rosoft 11:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article style

Hi Nuklear,

like you, I am interested in the pharmacology of psychoactive compounds. I have noticed that you have put much effort and time into articles like phenidate, peridine, nocaine, phenyltropane, ohmefentanyl, 2Design. Most of these articles are essentially scientific review articles that summarize in-depth experimental data. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and therefore has a very different style, please see the guideline at Wikipedia:Guide_to_writing_better_articles. Essentially, we put high emphasize on crosslinking articles, we summarize from secondary sources (we do not write them ourselves), and we avoid extremely specific details which only a dedicated few care about (please see Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information).

In their current form these articles are not really suited for Wikipedia and need heavy editing to become encyclopedic articles. Please help in these changes and do not be offended by such edits. Pleae try to get a feeling for the Wikipedia style by reading the Wikipedia guidelines and other existing articles (I know that this takes a while from my own experience). Feel free to respond on this page. Cacycle 20:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have also commented on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SNDRI. Have you ever thought about starting or continuing a scientific career in pharmacology or medicinal chemistry? There are labs that do exactly what you are interested in - you are actually citing their work all the time! You would have so such much better resources inside academia compared to a small company or as an isolated person. It would also be the only position from where you could submit real scientific publications :-) You should move these articles to your website, they will not survive in their current form - not because they are bad, only because this is not the right place for this format. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need Wikipedia advice. Cacycle 00:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not meaning to offend

I had no intentions of impugning your work, because obviously a massive amount went into these articles. Well over my head. The articles were nominated because they go well beyond the scope of what Wikipedia is intended for. The way I see it, Wikipedia is more a public library level project, and the articles as you wrote them are on the level of a university research library. I commented regarding copyvio, not because of any suggestions of plagiarism or other nefarious doings, but because at first glance, and article of such scope would most likely be hosted at another web site somewhere, and licensing issues can be tricky to sort out, even if the work is all your own. I've asked in the AfD for someone to clarify that question. In brief, they're not 'bad' articles, they're 'too much' articles. I do not work in the chemistry field, but hopefully another editor with the right resources can find these articles a more fitting home. DarkAudit 03:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

I am a pharma chemist. I think people are saying the style of the articles doesn't match the style of similar articles. One thing you can do is get a Google account and add them to Google Base and Google Pages. You can rewrite the articles in the Wikipedia style and link to your full articles. Don't get discouraged. There is always a place on the Internet for information and the more places it appears the better. It takes a while to be able write in the Wikipedia house style. Write me if you want to chat more. I am surprised you don't want to publish the articles in a journal and add them to your resume. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 04:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HIANKYO.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:HIANKYO.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Strangepicture.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Strangepicture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SNDRI

Per the close at this AfD, I have moved several articles into your userspace. They can stay there as long as you wish and you may use them for whatever purpose you desire. I greatly appreciate your efforts and am very sorry if you feel poorly used. Looking at these articles, they do seem awfully technical for a general encyclopedia. In my opinion they would probably be an ornament to Wikibooks], and would encourage you to transfer them if you still want to deal with us. Herostratus 17:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The new locations of the articles are:

Phenyltropane is now at User:Nuklear/Phenyltropane
SNDRI is now at User:Nuklear/SNDRI
Nocaine is now at User:Nuklear/Nocaine
Phenidate is now at User:Nuklear/Phenidate
Peridine is now at User:Nuklear/Peridine
Ohmefentanyl is now at User:Nuklear/Ohmefentanyl
Indatraline is now at User:Nuklear/Indatraline

Image:2b3b.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2b3b.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. isilanes (talk|contribs) 17:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles moved to userpage

Hey mate, glad to see the moderators have moved your pages to your userpage, now you can improve them to your hearts content without having to worry about some dumbass vandalising them! I restored ohmefentanyl to the most recent version on your userpage, when I have some free time from uni I'll rewrite your public wiki pages in a more encyclopedic style that they won't keep on deleting... Meodipt 12:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you </noinclude> the categories on them so they don't show up in the encyclopedic categories? Thanks. - Che Nuevara 22:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles not suited for Wikipedia

Hi Nuklear,

I have seen that you have spend much time recently on working on pages in your user namespace, including User:Nuklear/SNDRI, User:Nuklear/Phenyltropane, and User:Nuklear#Drug_Discovery.

As pointed out to you months ago, these articles are not suited for Wikipedia. They follow the style of scientific review articles, but not the quite different Wikipedia:Manual of Style. As far as I can see, they do (and will never) evolve into Wikipedia articles.

It is explicitly stated on Wikipedia:User page and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, social networking, or memorial site that Wikipedia user pages are not meant as free webspace, for file storage, or as personal advertisement. Your editing should be done on your local computer or your own wiki installation.

I would like to hear about your intention of working on these articles. Currently, I tend to mark them for deletion according to the Wikipedia:Deletion_policy as you did not change your behaviour over the last months.

Сасусlе 15:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cones.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cones.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bigr Tex 00:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Skanky.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Skanky.GIF. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bigr Tex 02:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Quench.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Quench.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 04:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Snowcane.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Snowcane.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 04:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SnowcaneNR2.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SnowcaneNR2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 04:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Snocaine.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Snocaine.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 04:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Thia.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Thia.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 15:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Taxil.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Taxil.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sepracor.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Sepracor.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DOV.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DOV.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RTI-177

A tag has been placed on RTI-177 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Falcon8765 (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RTI-31

Hi -- could you be a little more restrained in your language? Phrases like "ridiculously potent" don't belong in an encyclopedia. (Yes, somebody is paying attention.) Regards, Looie496 (talk) 00:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nafoxidine

A tag has been placed on Nafoxidine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ninety:one 20:14, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Nafoxidine

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Nafoxidine. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Wyeth NET.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wyeth NET.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjects

If you haven't joined, you might be interested in WP:PHARM or WP:CHEMS, which are pages where editors interested in medications and chemicals can talk to each other.

You seem to create a lot of articles in this area (Thanks!), and if you want, you can put them on the lists for the relevant editing groups. I'd suggest a scheme like this:

Kind of chemical	What to paste on to the talk page
Prescription/OTC drug (currently marketed, government-regulated therapeutic)	{{WikiProject Pharmacology \|class= \|importance=}} {{WPMED \|class= \|importance=}} (both of these)
Investigational new drug	{{WikiProject Pharmacology \|class= \|importance=Low}}
Hallucinogens (legal or not)	{{WikiProject PDD \|class= \|importance=}}
No human testing (yet)	{{Chemicals \|class= \|importance=}}

This is optional, of course, but doing this will increase the likelihood that other interested editors will find and watch your new articles. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Serotonin-norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor

Hi Nuklear, I appreciate the work you have been doing lately, but the tone used in this and several other articles is highly inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Since you seem to be basically building the SNDRI article from scratch, wouldn't you prefer to work on it in a personal sandbox (in your userspace) and move relevant information to the actual article when it's more polished? Best wishes, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taxil

Nuklear, where did you get the names "Taxil" and "Taroxetine" from? Have these been used in the literature? Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And why is this compound notable or important? Fvasconcellos (t·c) 13:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understood the reasoning behind the name, but is it used in the literature or did you come up with it? If the name is not used in the literature, is not a codename, and is not an INN, then it is original research and cannot be used.

The possibility of "people getting bunk products" does not, unfortunately, make the compound notable for Wikipedia's purposes. Wikipedia is a general purpose encyclopedia, and it doesn't really serve a public service role for the scientific community! If the compound is not being tested for use in humans and is not worthy of note as a research chemical, then we shouldn't have an article about it. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What about the name? Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It can't be used, then: it is original research, which is strictly forbidden in Wikipedia. Nothing that you come up with can be added to articles; neither can personal opinion.

Is there a codename for the compound? If not, it should be moved to the IUPAC name. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it has a codename, great, but if you obtain it from a personal communication, it's no good either :) It must have been published. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 19:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And another thing...

When you have doubts about a statement, don't add it to mainspace. Pretty please. Information that is added to articles must be accurate and backed up by reliable sources. A rule of thumb—any sentence you feel compelled to end with a question mark shouldn't be there in the first place. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 03:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paroxetine

I read some of your edits and agree with them, let me know if I can help. Abcdohrayme (talk) 03:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)abcdohrayme[reply]

NowCommons: File:Phenyltropane.gif

File:Phenyltropane.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Phenyltropane.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Phenyltropane.gif]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RTIthreefivethree.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:RTIthreefivethree.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:RTI-51 structure.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:RTI-51 structure.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 02:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One pot

The article One pot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DICT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Info

Hi Nuklear. I don't suppose you know whether there is a PAL number for 2-fluoroamphetamine like there is for the 3- and 4- isomers? Also have you ever seen an actual literature reference for 1-phenyl-2-methylamino-butan-1-one (aside from the Hive and Hyperlab)? Just as these compounds are both reportedly being sold as RCs so it would be good to find more info about them, but my literature searches are coming up rather empty. Meodipt (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2-fluoroamphetamine has a CAS number and a PubChem entry so obviously has been reported in the literature somewhere before. A huge number of simple mono and dual ring substitutions of amphetamine were tested quite early on in the search for new anorectics (although p,m substitutions much more than o- admittedly), but most of the refs are so old they are not available online, which makes it much harder. The alpha ethyl methcathinone compound on the other hand looks like a new chemical entity so far as I can see, probably from the same people who came up with 4-methylmethcathinone I imagine...Meodipt (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RTI-274

Done. Please cite the patent in the article as well. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tropiperidine.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tropiperidine.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2-phenylethylalcohol

A tag has been placed on 2-phenylethylalcohol, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no article. --Yikrazuul (talk) 00:22, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yikrazuul (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phthalane

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Phthalane, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JNJ-39,836,966

A tag has been placed on JNJ-39,836,966, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no article, no refs, no nothing! --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Hello Nuklear. Please stop writing "articles" with no information. Ofentimes even any text is missing. They will be deleted anyway, or, in some cases, an existing article exists. Thanks! --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I recommend that you use edit summaries. They are both functional and a courtesy to other editors.--Smokefoot (talk) 00:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cite journal

You refer to Template:Cite journal usage in the article as filth. However, your edits changing it to cite pmid lead to the breaking of at least one ref,[1] and the deletion of the many full text URLs; often the data cited is not in the abstract but in the full text URLs, so would lead to failed verification accusations. The Template:Cite journal and related templates are used throughout wikipedia by most wikipedians. I am sorry just felt this needed addressed, not trying to be annoying. :)--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 13:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alniditan

A tag has been placed on Alniditan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuffledThud (talk) 12:31, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elzasonan

A tag has been placed on Elzasonan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuffledThud (talk) 12:36, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alvameline

A tag has been placed on Alvameline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuffledThud (talk) 12:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Monasterol

A tag has been placed on Monasterol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuffledThud (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indef

I blocked you indef for blantant copyright violations, even after plenty of warnings. Secret ^account 13:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ritz.GIF listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ritz.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Oxadiazole.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Oxadiazole.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — ξ ^xplicit 06:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have renamed this to File:Oxadiazole P.png as it was .png not .svg; and it is not as described. What is the true description? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images you made for List of phenyltropanes

File:CocaineHCl.gif

Cocaine HCl.

Hello Nuklear, many of those images you made, I assume with a program for molecule graphing, on the list of phenyltropanes pages, are simply great.

My question to you is; The image I found and recreated to the right, by scratch, is an alternate conformation of the basic cocaine benzoyl tropane in a 2D diagram. I was wondering if the same could be done, possibly through the program that many use here on wikipedia for molecules nearly ubiquitously if that is what you did, as an alternate for many of those phenyltropanes, to get an idea of how else they may look in two dimensions. I personally find that cocaine example much more symmetrical and therefore easy to apprehend geometrically than the variant you have used with some of those molecules created in the phenyltropanes. Please get back to me this topic interests me greatly and seeing them in a alternate 2D conformation may open my nose to a new way of realizing some of those. Nagelfar (talk) 09:49, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indatraline.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Indatraline.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indatraline.GIF missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Indatraline.GIF is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DOR.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DOR.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DOV21497.GIF missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DOV21497.GIF is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Triplemode.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Triplemode.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PTwireframe.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PTwireframe.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 00:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amide.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amide.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BTfensine.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BTfensine.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atropine.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atropine.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diaryl.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Diaryl.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indatraline.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Indatraline.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modafinil Hybrid.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Modafinil Hybrid.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hey, Nuklear

I was introduced to this paper, and there were some benzoyloxy- & phenyl- tropane analogs which I thought would go well on my and your articles on the matter. I added my reasons & which specific instances on the discussion pages of both. I do not have a very good chemical drawing program. Though I notice your page relies heavily on RTI's analogs and this paper seems to include ones that are not RTI also, if that is interesting. Nagelfar (talk) 12:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RTI-274 structure.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RTI-274 structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coke Disc Pot.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coke Disc Pot.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Triple.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Triple.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DTMP synthesis.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DTMP synthesis.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Astra NK1.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Astra NK1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bromadol synthesis.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bromadol synthesis.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skeletal rearrangement.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Skeletal rearrangement.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phthalane.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Phthalane.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CoMFA.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CoMFA.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dummy.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dummy.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM} 14:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ephedrone.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ephedrone.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 21:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nuklear for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — KC9TV 03:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tables on List of phenyltropanes page

Some of the tables you made for the affinity of binding to the transporters of the three monoamines on your phenyltropane list article have the order DA|5-HTP|NE and others have the order DA|NE|5-HTP. Was this on purpose? Is the swapping of NE & 5-HTP a mistake and some information is given for the wrong transporter? If so could the ones in error be corrected and if not could they be all brought to the same order for visual reference consistency? 174.25.78.176 (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:CD Graph.GIF or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Maryanoff.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maryanoff.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:NET.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NET.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scopolamine.GIF listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scopolamine.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:38, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nuklear

A tag has been placed on User:Nuklear, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Blank userpage. User blocked indefinitely but blank userpage hides the block notice. Delete in order for notice to appear.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. kashmiri ^TALK 22:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuklear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to work on the synthesis pages of the drugs/chemicals pages. The ban is over five years old so please revoke my user rights.--Nuklear (talk) 19:53, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Time alone is enough. Please explain here what you did wrong, and also tell us your understanding of copyright as it applies within Wikipedia. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuklear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can somebody unblock this account now please? I'm feeling quite a bit a lot abused that my account is still blocked after all these years. The original reaason I was blocked was for not using ″paraphrasing″ when copying something over from a journal onto the website. But I am at least 5 years older now. I have learnt new things since then and have a different attitude to editing websites now than I did before.

Decline reason:

In declining your previous unblock request, Anthony Bradbury told you that to be unblocked you would need to "explain here what you did wrong, and also tell us your understanding of copyright as it applies within Wikipedia". You have still not done that. Also, I strongly suggest that you comment on the sockpuppetry issue, as you are unlikely to be unblocked as long as that remains unanswered. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nuklear has edited steadily through their block. see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nuklear/Archive and see this search of my contribs, where i have been removing their edits as they hopped from IP to IP. The editing pattern has not just changed a drop from what I can see over that whole time. Please also see this exchange on my Talk page, as well as this.

Nuklear, how exactly is your attitude different now? To be unblocked you need to show that you understand what you did wrong and give some reason for the community to trust you going forward. Jytdog (talk) 08:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Take Lofepramine for example, by looking at http://www.druglead.com/cds/lofepramine.html I can make a synthesis section out of the patent without using a book, just entirely on my own. I have a strong masters degree in chemistry since 10 years ago btw, I am not "self-taught." I have a linkedin webpage where you can see my qualifications and background experience to show it is genuine & not made-up lies.--Nuklear (talk) 13:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a couple years late, but hopefully you notice it. The problem is that if you synthesize a great section just on your own, there's no way for anyone else to verify that. If you, however, started a good blog with good references that people could go read and verify, then you could start to develop a reputation for good blog articles on various drugs or drug interactions, and then that blog could be used as a reference for editing Wikipedia articles, including via edits that you make yourself (although you'd have to put a note in the edit summary that you were quoting yourself). Wikipedia should be like an academic paper -- you need to put references so that others can go follow them and see whether what you say is correct or not. Good luck! :) Banaticus (talk) 17:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can't make up anything "just on your own"; look at WP:SYNTH. By the way, what's a "strong" masters degree in chemistry? Do you get to say "M.A.(strong)" after your name if you want? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:37, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user is the most persistent sock I have come across. They continue to "copy and paste" on a regular basis. I have blocked many dozens of their accounts. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nuklear, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lerdthenerd wiki defender 12:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical bankruptcy image up for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bankrupt.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Unfortunately, it appears that you were blocked eight years ago, so this notice is largely to follow procedure. Sorry about that. Have a great day, Banaticus (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ohmefentanyl.png

The file File:Ohmefentanyl.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PT-TMP.png

The file File:PT-TMP.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:APRD00657 PDB.gif

The file File:APRD00657 PDB.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Meperidine.gif

The file File:Meperidine.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Triple reuptake inhibitor.gif

The file File:Triple reuptake inhibitor.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bromadol3D.png

The file File:Bromadol3D.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ohmefentanyl.gif

The file File:Ohmefentanyl.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuklear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been 10 years since the ban. I think I should be allowed back in now. Nuklear (talk) 06:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been evading your block. If you can go six months without editing as an IP editor or using sock puppet accounts, we'll consider unblocking you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuklear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I noticed I posted this over a year ago. I've been considering wanting to come back to possibly create some new articles. I believe I have a level of education where I can definately contribute to the quality of the website. I have a lot of information on my cloud/harddrive that is original content and not copied from other peoples sources.

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates that you have been editing logged out. PhilKnight (talk) 07:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As it says, "Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked." This removal was particularly telling. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuklear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been 13 years since the ban. I think I should be allowed back in now. I have a degree in chemistry and good interest in developing pages in pharmaceuticals Nuklear (talk)

Decline reason:

Please sign in to your account and make your request there. You need to address the reason for your block and you need to address your block evasion. Yamla (talk) 10:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuklear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was originally blocked for copyright infringement but I am older and wiser now. I was using copyright evasion to improve the content of the site while I was banned under this username. I have never vandalized or damaged the content of the site though. It's been 13 years since the ban. I think I should be allowed back in now. I have a degree in chemistry and good interest in developing pages in pharmaceuticals Nuklear — Preceding undated comment added 12:35, 9 September 2023‎ (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Copyright infringement is damaging to the site. Your unblock requests have not demonstrated that you understand Wikipedia's copyright policy. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.