Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 March 21
March 21
[edit]
- Copyright violation, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Vulneratus (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Vulneratus (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, obsoleted by Image:Myreth sulfate.png on the Commons. —Bkell (talk) 00:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Matt Yeager (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, not clear how this can be used in an encyclopedia article. —Bkell (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, sorry, my bad for not using this earlier... I worked it into a template on my page. I honestly completely forgot it was on here. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 06:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, low quality, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 02:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Andrewduffell (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic? BigrTex 02:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete
- - uploaded by Eliot Hampden-Turner (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 02:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Valley_of_Fire (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 02:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:877559849 m.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).
- - uploaded by Edit Centric (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned BigrTex 02:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, Obsoleted by Image:Q00.svg Nv8200p talk 02:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Arundhati bakshi (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Terrance Lindall (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 02:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Christophe15 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 02:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 02:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Raytoonscartoons (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Raytoonscartoons (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Raytoonscartoons (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Weeditlife (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 03:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Wikistrike (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- No source is given for this image. The first few images listed at a Papert Google image search look familiar but are not exactly this image. I list it here for broader discussion instead of tagging it with {{no source}} because it was uploaded in September 2005 and because the nominator has not contributed since December 2006. Iamunknown 03:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by FrummerThanThou (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 03:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by GreyWyvern (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 03:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have added it back to Robert J. Sawyer. It is a free image that illustrates the subject of the article. It has been removed twice, once to be replaced with a Fair Use image and the other time without comment. ~ BigrTex 14:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Now on commons. ~ BigrTex 14:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kid Charlemagne123 (notify | contribs).
- Being a CD cover (see Special:Undelete/User:Kid_Hurricane and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kid Hurricane), I doubt that this is properly licensed. If it was a FU image (which I suspect), it's orphaned (as the content has been deleted from Wikipedia), so win-win I guess. Daniel Bryant 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kid Charlemagne123 (notify | contribs).
- Being a CD cover (see Special:Undelete/User:Kid_Hurricane and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kid Hurricane), I doubt that this is properly licensed. If it was a FU image (which I suspect), it's orphaned (as the content has been deleted from Wikipedia), so win-win I guess. Daniel Bryant 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kid Charlemagne123 (notify | contribs).
- Being a CD cover (see Special:Undelete/User:Kid_Hurricane and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kid Hurricane), I doubt that this is properly licensed. If it was a FU image (which I suspect), it's orphaned (as the content has been deleted from Wikipedia), so win-win I guess. Daniel Bryant 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kid Charlemagne123 (notify | contribs).
- Being a CD cover (see Special:Undelete/User:Kid_Hurricane and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kid Hurricane), I doubt that this is properly licensed. If it was a FU image (which I suspect), it's orphaned (as the content has been deleted from Wikipedia), so win-win I guess. Daniel Bryant 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kid Charlemagne123 (notify | contribs).
- Being a CD cover (see Special:Undelete/User:Kid_Hurricane and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kid Hurricane), I doubt that this is properly licensed. If it was a FU image (which I suspect), it's orphaned (as the content has been deleted from Wikipedia), so win-win I guess. Daniel Bryant 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kid Charlemagne123 (notify | contribs).
- Being a CD cover (see Special:Undelete/User:Kid_Hurricane and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kid Hurricane), I doubt that this is properly licensed. If it was a FU image (which I suspect), it's orphaned (as the content has been deleted from Wikipedia), so win-win I guess. Daniel Bryant 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kid Charlemagne123 (notify | contribs).
- Being a CD cover (see Special:Undelete/User:Kid_Hurricane and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kid Hurricane), I doubt that this is properly licensed. If it was a FU image (which I suspect), it's orphaned (as the content has been deleted from Wikipedia), so win-win I guess. Daniel Bryant 10:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Please investigate more fully before nominating for deletion. This image is not tagged as fair use. It is, however, orphaned, so I guess deletion is appropriate. JulesH 19:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Grujic.marko (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 12:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Nikkos5455 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 12:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Xandy Coordinate (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 12:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Funnypinoy87 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 12:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 13:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 13:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image is tagged as a promophoto comming from "FX's Press website", but the images in this site are intended by the copyright holder (FX Networks) to be used only by those who obtained "prior written consent" for doing so (otherwise, only "personal, non-commercial purposes" use is allowed). The site terms of use states:
- "All materials contained in this Site (...) must only be used for personal, non-commercial purposes.";
- "The reproduction, duplication, distribution (..) of material from this Site is STRICTLY PROHIBITED unless you have obtained the prior written consent of FX";
- "The material covered by this prohibition includes, without limitation, any text, graphics, logos, photographs..."
- "The use of materials from this Site on any other web site (...) is similarly prohibited."; and
- "Requests for permission to reproduce or distribute materials found on this Site can be made by contacting FX Business & Legal Affairs at 10201 West Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90035"
The copyright holder has a business based on controlling which websites can use these images, and our use of them undermine this business. - Abu badali (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Terms of use of copyright holders are irrelevant for fair use images. The image does appear to be in use for promotional purposes on the site linked, so I'd say fair use promotional is correct tagging of this image. JulesH 19:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Terms of use of copyright holders are not irrelevant. Believing that they are is what make {{promotional}} the most abused image tag on Wikipedia. A real "promotional" image is one intended to be used by any media members for identification and critical commentary on some product (like a movie). This image is intended to be used by selected FX Network's clients, according to their approval of it's use. FX Networks may choose to license this image just for this or that website, improving the site's value, according to commercial deals. Our unauthorized use of this image hurts the copyright holder habitability to profit from such deals).
- As I said, the copyright holder has a business based on controlling which websites can use these images, and our use of them undermine this business. --Abu badali (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- The tag content states only "This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit." The image is from FX Network's press images site. The fact that they charge for the right to duplicate is irrelevant, because we're using the image under fair use laws. Per Wikipedia:Fair use, the only rules that have to be met are the 10 set out there. No free equivalent is available; the fact that the image is low resolution (and, indeed, a resolution that can be downloaded from FX Network's web site without paying) tends to suggest that the fact the image is available here doesn't undermine their business; the image is low resolution; it has been published; it is encyclopedic; it doesn't violate image use policy; it is in use in an article; it identifies the subject of the article; it isn't used in any namespace other than article and it contains an appropriate attribution to source and copyright holder, a correct tag (the image came from a press kit), and a fair use rationale. This image does not violate policy. JulesH 08:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence suggests that this image has been released by its copyright holder(s) for use as a promotional image by any party. Unless such evidence is presented, we cannot assume it is a promotional image. As such, it should be deleted. --Iamunknown 02:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- It came from a page titled as the press resources site for FX Networks. What more evidence do you want that it's a promotional image? JulesH 08:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- The "Press" in the title does not nullifies the comprehensive "Terms of Use" text in the site. --Abu badali (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- It came from a page titled as the press resources site for FX Networks. What more evidence do you want that it's a promotional image? JulesH 08:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, and we have latex for this — Berland 14:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:apd.gif listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).
- The Greek meanings are listed on the crest revealing a meaning that shouldn't be there for all to see and decode, so I would like to delete this version of our crest and replace it with one that does not show the Greek words but rather just "Alpha Phi Delta" at the bottom of the crest. — Cbauer86 14:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
DELETE. New crest has been uploaded without greek meaning. BroadSt Bully 14:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ebac on keyboard (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned BigrTex 15:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Northenglish (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned BigrTex 16:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 16:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Shanerator2 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 16:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tagged as promotional but http://movies.yahoo.com is not a source for promotional images. According to item #12 in the site's terms of service, the site's content is not to be reproduced, duplicated, copied, etc.- Abu badali (talk) 16:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Terms of service are irrelevant; this is a fair use image. The image is clearly a promotional image; why else would yahoo have it in their collection of promotional images of Natalie Portman? JulesH 18:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- "Terms of service" pages are exactly what determines if an image is promotional. A real promotional image from a starwars movie, for instance, should come from starwars.com or lucasfilm.com with an accompanying "terms of use" statement saying "these images may be used by the media for identification or critical commentary on our movies...".
- The fact that yahoo was granted the right to use this image doesn't imply at all that every other website is welcome to do so. --Abu badali (talk) 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. --DrBat 01:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence suggests that this image has been released by its copyright holder(s) for use as a promotional image by any party. Unless such evidence is presented, we cannot assume it is a promotional image. As such, it should be deleted. --Iamunknown 02:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept. Image is tagged as fair use. -Nv8200p talk 17:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 16:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 16:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 16:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by User:Nuklear (notify | contribs).
- Apparently incorrect copyright tag -- claims to be a US government work, but no US government source supplied and image uses names established by "Hochemicals", a non-notable British company, which suggests it is unlikely to be a US government work. — JulesH 17:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, doubtful GFDL Nv8200p talk 17:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Image is free, and shows an innovative product that is generating a reasonable amount of interest in the guitar equipment world. We might not currently have an article about this subject, but this may well change in the future, at which point having a freely-licensed copy of the company's official promotional photo will be helpful. JulesH 17:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Exactly. Unused, promotional, delete. - Mike Rosoft 23:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Grad co-op (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by User:Nuklear (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic: Image exists to explain non-notable names applied to a series of similar chemicals by Hochemicals, an apparently completely unnotable British company — JulesH 17:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
No I need it there so I can see the sterochemistry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuklear (talk • contribs)
- Then use a version that doesn't attach names that are apparently original research to the variants. Or don't, because as far as I can see the entire table that it's used in is original research. JulesH 18:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
ive revized it now. I'll consider deletion (of the picture) later when im completely satisfied that everything is where it should be.--Nuklear 21:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Image still uses original research names. JulesH 23:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by GARITUBITUZABY (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 17:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Steve tutty (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by GC Boombox (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Jacobo I. Guerrero (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Jordan ellipsis (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, Doubtful GFDL Nv8200p talk 17:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- - uploaded by Dominus hp (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, probably Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 17:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Dominus hp (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Probably Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 17:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Genomic-Medicine-Info (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Maybe Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 17:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mariam Japaridze (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 17:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Commons image showing through. ~ BigrTex 14:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 17:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PineappleGlock (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by PineappleGlock (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 17:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Sadashivpeth (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,Absent uploader BigrTex 18:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Corky_Butchek (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,Unencyclopedic BigrTex 18:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned BigrTex 18:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)- Please keep this image. I'm trying to set up an image gallery for Toy soldier and would like to display it there. I have linked it to the discussion area of that page. --Jcbutler 22:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep No longer orphaned. ~ BigrTex 15:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It looks okay and is no longer orphaned--Janarius 17:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Andremuller (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 18:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Andremuller (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned,Unencyclopedic,Absent uploader BigrTex 18:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Humus sapiens (notify | contribs).
- Tagged as {{HistoricPhoto}}, but the image is not notable (just old).- Abu badali (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Image is on use in 4 pages, and is almost certainly fair use in at least Havlagah, as it is unreplaceable. I have changed the tag to a more appropriate one. JulesH 19:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- The tag was changed to {{Non-free fair use in}} without a rationale. The image is as irreplaceable in Havlagah as it is unnecessary. --Abu badali (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- The rationale was already there. It says "This is a historic photo made during the Havlagah period (1930s), free replacement is unavalaible". This certainly looks like a fair use rationale to me. And the image appears to be performing a useful function on Havlagah to me. JulesH 19:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- A claim that some image is an historic photo needs to be backed up. Was this image discussed in some published work? Did it received any award?
- For an unfree image to be used in some article, it should be doing far more that simply "performing a useful function". --Abu badali (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- The rationale was already there. It says "This is a historic photo made during the Havlagah period (1930s), free replacement is unavalaible". This certainly looks like a fair use rationale to me. And the image appears to be performing a useful function on Havlagah to me. JulesH 19:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- The tag was changed to {{Non-free fair use in}} without a rationale. The image is as irreplaceable in Havlagah as it is unnecessary. --Abu badali (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - but for another reason - the same picture with a better image quality, improved title and PD-licensed is now in commons: Image:Havlagah bus during 1936-1939 Arab revolt-British Mandate of Palestine.jpg. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ну? 08:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, since I uploaded the old image, I thought it was fair for me to do the dirty job and delete it. ←Humus sapiens ну? 08:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The image on commons says it's PD because of Israel laws. When something enters PD in Israel does it automatically enters PD in USA? I hope so. --Abu badali (talk) 13:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- It seems commons has a template for such images: commons:Template:PD-Israel-Photo. Are there other images like that, tagged as {{historicPhoto}}? They should be moved to commons as well. Thanks Humus_sapiens for the research work!
- Orphaned, Obsolete (Image:PAC-1.JPG) BigrTex 18:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned BigrTex 18:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Real Trini (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigrTex 18:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Image of non-notable band — Jay†Litman 19:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, possible Copyright violation BigrTex 19:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Captain Future (notify | contribs).
- Unecessary Playboy cover. Was uploaded to be used to illustrate the article about the model depicted (against WP:FU#Counterexamples #7 ). The cover has nothing notable enough to justify it being used neither on the model's biography nor on the magazine article. I (and orther user) tried orphanizing it, but the "orphan" tag keeps being reverted.- Abu badali (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- It shows a list of songs downloaded on LimeWire for the purpose of showing a picture of the program. It is illegal to download songs, and I think that this image should be deleted and replaced with a photo that doesn't promote illegal activity. — Superior1 20:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's not illegal to download songs (although there are powerful institutions that want us to believe it is). --Abu badali (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't realize that Limewire was GPL'd. Is it available in Linux? If so, this image and the images on Commons should be deleted since they contain non-trivial elements of Windows and Mac OS X and then be replaced with a screenshots in a free-content version of Linux. --Iamunknown 20:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- I believe such images can be cropped so that they don't contain any elements of Windows or Mac. I've done that to Image:LimewireWindowsVista.jpg, for instance. Answering your question, yes, works on Linux --Abu badali (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Phillip Rosenthal (notify | contribs).
- I uploaded this image of myself. This is one taken in Hawaii and I'm not sure if I want this on my open source encyclopedia userpage since I've seriously begun to contribute regulary. Kindly delete as I've orphaned it. Regards, Phillip Rosenthal 20:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tiny; larger version available as Image:Benjamin-Constant-The Entry of Mahomet II into Constantinople-1876.jpg. — grendel|khan 20:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, delete the older one immediately. Deliogul 14:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by EliminatorJR (notify | contribs).
- Image:StMarysChurch47.jpg - obsoleted by Image:StMarysChurchClifton.jpg — EliminatorJR Talk 21:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Karen Solvig (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Obsolete (Image:Luo4shu1.jpg) BigrTex 22:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Winehouse47 (notify | contribs).
- The source link doesn't work and the license given is wrong. — Dantadd 22:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Karen Solvig (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 22:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ellectrika (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic Orphaned BigrTex 22:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 22:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 22:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by SunnyBaudel1 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 22:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Martialartit (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 23:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Battle_Ape (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned BigrTex 23:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unused, possibly unfree. - Mike Rosoft 23:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Paullong444 (notify | contribs).
- Unused, unencyclopedic, previously used (under a different filename) in a speedily deleted article Greatatronics. - Mike Rosoft 23:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Only used in a deleted article. - Mike Rosoft 23:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Only used in a deleted article about a non-existent kind of apples. - Mike Rosoft 23:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unused, probably related to the previous image. - Mike Rosoft 23:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Battle Ape (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned BigrTex 23:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 23:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 23:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Invisibility (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned BigrTex 23:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 23:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Likely copyright violation; all other images uploaded by this user have been mistagged as gfdl-self — Part Deux 23:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 23:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 23:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Copyright violation BigrTex 23:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Copyright violation BigrTex 23:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader, Copyright violation BigrTex 23:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 00:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
