Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 May 28
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 May 28)
May 28
[edit]
- orphaned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chocolate Cake City (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Wendywilde (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely should be tagged non-free promo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chavezguevara (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, appears to be a scan and likely non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Elcapitan23 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Stolen apologies (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Stolen apologies (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Susikekelos (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, replaced with Image:Jpschools.jpg User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely should be tagged as non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Anthony Appleyard (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, unsure of an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Now used in Jacket lapel, which see.
- Jacket lapel formerly pointed to it by the [[:Image:imagename]] format. Anthony Appleyard 04:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Not deleted. howcheng {chat} 23:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, likely should be tagged as non-free screenshot User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Iraninafilmstar (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, question licensing tags applied given quality of image and other images mis-tagged by user User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Veracious Rey (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by James Cotter (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Plus:
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- - uploaded by Sandakanboy (notify | contribs).
- Fails fair use. Thousands of images of this guy exist. Just because one editor can't secure a free one doesn't mean we get to pirate an AP photographer's work. The uploader's argument that he's tried to find a free image but failed is counterintuitive. If we get to pirate an AP photographer's work because one editor can't find a free image, what's our motivation to even look? — Rklawton 02:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- As I noted on the talk page, I made several good faith efforts to try and secure a free image and failing that looked through the qualifications WP:FAIRUSE and picked an image that seemed to best fulfill those categories (including making proper attribution to the source which is counterintuitive to "pirating" something). The hang up that RkLawton seems to have is over the "hypothetical assumption" that there simply must be free alternatives somewhere that someone will eventually bring to the article sometimes. In the vast majority of circumstances, I actually fall into the same camp as RkLawton when it comes to fair use. I work on a lot of wine articles and have been searching for images to use on some BLPs like Toby Meltzer. In those cases I refuse to consider a fair use images because I know the very nature of those subjects means that a fair and rational opportunity to procure a free image exist and I feel that the onus is me (or any other editor) wanting to have an image to go out and take one if all else fails. However in the case of a decease individual the pool of potential free images is dramatically reduced. The opportunity for a wikipedia editor to grab their camera and snap a picture (or ask someone to do it for them) is eliminated and the current existing resources is very finite. This creates an inherent systematic bias towards images for articles of living people and non-human objects at the expense of the encyclopedic quality and service of articles about deceased individuals. I certainly tried to find a free article and I will gladly accept any provided replacement but its hard to sacrifice the quality of an article based upon a vague and "hypothetical assumption" that the image is "replaceable" and that there simply must be some free image out there. In reading WP:FAIRUSE, the "replaceable" clause seems very vague and subjective in application and I don't think it adequately addresses the limited opportunity and free use potential with deceased subjects. If the community consensus of Wikipedia is to go full tilt with the "hypothetical assumptions" of existing free use images out there then I really don't think there is any point in having WP:FAIRUSE at all. In theory anything is replaceable because under some rock somewhere could exist a free picture just waiting to be uploaded. AgneCheese/Wine 07:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- That reasoning might be good enough for a published publicity photo, but there's certainly no excuse for pirating an AP photographer's work. Rklawton 01:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have to say you are closing in the incivility line (especially with the edit summary "stealing is stealing") and I would appreciate if you took a step back from that line. One does not steal something that they are properly attributing to the source and AP photographer, in accordance to WP:FAIRUSE. Also in accordance to WP:FAIRUSE, I deliberately selected the poorest quality version of that photograph out the three copies that I found on purpose to ensure that there was no damage to the copyright holder's ability to use the image commercially or to allow others to make copies and truly "pirate" the image. I have made every effort to respect and attribute the work of the original photographer (including attempting to find contact information on the individual to directly ask for permission but several days of searching has not come up with anything). I would appreciate if you extend a bit of civil respect and good faith to one of your fellow editors and not so liberally accuse people of stealing or pirating.AgneCheese/Wine 05:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- "It's not stealing because I properly attributed the source and the photographer" is one of the myths of copyright. I'm not saying you did steal, I'm just saying that it isn't a valid defense against accusations of copyright infringement. Anrie 13:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- That reasoning might be good enough for a published publicity photo, but there's certainly no excuse for pirating an AP photographer's work. Rklawton 01:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 03:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 03:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 03:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by MayaEvening (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 03:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 03:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Bwhittington (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use. Uploader states "my photo", which is not necessarilly a statement of authorship BigDT 04:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Bwhittington (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use. Uploader states "my photo", which is not necessarilly a statement of authorship BigDT 04:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Bwhittington (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use. Uploader states "my photo", which is not necessarilly a statement of authorship BigDT 04:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Bwhittington (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use. Uploader states "my photo", which is not necessarilly a statement of authorship BigDT 04:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mperezrosas (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 05:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mperezrosas (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 05:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Mcarruthers (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 05:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 05:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Oliverward (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 05:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic BigDT 05:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Florencebballer (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, apparently identical to Image:Universityofsouthcarolinaseal.JPG. Uploader is probably not the creator, so the PD-self claim is probably invalid. —Bkell (talk) 07:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- This is not a picture of Andy Murray — Egriffin 12:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Timthecamel (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 12:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Ardianbudi (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader MER-C 13:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned Absent uploader, questionable encyclopedic value MER-C 13:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- cbs.com is not a source of promo material. They produce images to enchance their site, not ours. Abu badali (talk) 14:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I keep telling you that these images are used not just on CBS.com, but on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- cbs.com may have deals with other websites (or magazines, whatever) to let them use their images under certain circumstances. The terms of use of sites like tv.yahoo.com or imdb.com, for instance, make it clear that they have deals with content providers like cbs. But for a normal person downloading one of the images from the cbs.com website, the binding deal is their terms of use document, that clearly states that those images are not promotional material. They are for personal and non-commercial use only.
- Also, being "way better than any screenshot" is not a good fair use claim. --Abu badali (talk) 23:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I still stand by what I said. There is no reason why these images should not be kept. They are to illustrate copyrighted characters, therefore there is NO "free" replacement. If CBS (or Yahoo, or any of the other given sites) complain, that would be a good reason to delete the image. That has not happened. Images from official sites such as CBS.com, NBC.com, ABC.com, etc, are widely used in Wikipedia articles to illustrate soap opera characters. Some examples: Marlena Evans, Lucas Roberts, Lulu Spencer. Kogsquinge 03:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you need to illustrate fiction characters from tv or movies, use screenshots. While not free, they have a sound fair use rationale. Fair use allow us to use a portion of a copyrighted work when discussing that copyrighted work itself. While a screenshot is a portion of the copyrighted movie or tv show in question, theses images are complete and independent copyrighted works. They were produced by they copyright owners to be used by them, either on their websites or on those of it's affiliates or clients. There's a whole business model based on internet by-products of tv-shows, and these images were produced to be used in this market. We can't simply use them in our website without competing with their original market role. --Abu badali (talk) 12:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, but aside from the fact that the quality of screenshots is extremely inferior to that of the CBS photos, I have not been able to FIND any screenshots that are not from sites such as CBS.com. Kogsquinge 22:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you need to illustrate fiction characters from tv or movies, use screenshots. While not free, they have a sound fair use rationale. Fair use allow us to use a portion of a copyrighted work when discussing that copyrighted work itself. While a screenshot is a portion of the copyrighted movie or tv show in question, theses images are complete and independent copyrighted works. They were produced by they copyright owners to be used by them, either on their websites or on those of it's affiliates or clients. There's a whole business model based on internet by-products of tv-shows, and these images were produced to be used in this market. We can't simply use them in our website without competing with their original market role. --Abu badali (talk) 12:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- I still stand by what I said. There is no reason why these images should not be kept. They are to illustrate copyrighted characters, therefore there is NO "free" replacement. If CBS (or Yahoo, or any of the other given sites) complain, that would be a good reason to delete the image. That has not happened. Images from official sites such as CBS.com, NBC.com, ABC.com, etc, are widely used in Wikipedia articles to illustrate soap opera characters. Some examples: Marlena Evans, Lucas Roberts, Lulu Spencer. Kogsquinge 03:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- I keep telling you that these images are used not just on CBS.com, but on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- cbs.com is not a source of promo material. They produce images to enchance their site, not ours. Abu badali (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I keep telling you that these images are used not just on CBS.com, but on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promotional material. Source is a fansite. Abu badali (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- fantasysoapnet.com is not a source of promo material. They produce images to enchance their site, not ours (see "terms of use"). Abu badali (talk) 14:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source is a fansite. Abu badali (talk) 14:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Abu badali (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- No evidence this was released as promo material. Source seems to be a Finish fansite, with unclear copyright notice or terms of use. Abu badali (talk) 14:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- tv.yahoo.com is not a source of promo material. Abu badali (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- tv.yahoo.com is not a source of promo material. Abu badali (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- the-new-yr-totally-sucks.org is not a source for sony's promotional material. Abu badali (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- tv.yahoo.com is not a source for promotional material. Abu badali (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- the-new-yr-totally-sucks.org is not a source for sony's promotional material. Abu badali (talk) 14:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- tv.yahoo.com is not a source of promo material. Abu badali (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- the-new-yr-totally-sucks.org is not a source for sony's promotional material. Abu badali (talk) 14:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- the-new-yr-totally-sucks.org is not a source for sony's promotional material. Abu badali (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- tv.yahoo.com is not a source of promo material. Abu badali (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kogsquinge (notify | contribs).
- tv.yahoo.com is not a source of promo material. Abu badali (talk) 14:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- These images are used on many other sites and in a lot of magazines. They illustrate the subject of the articles way better than any screenshot. They are obviously promotional. And they are clearly referenced. STRONG KEEP Kogsquinge 22:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Is not a website screenshot (incorrectly tagged), and is copyrighted. No appropriate fair use rationale given. Uploader has been notified. Samsara (talk • contribs) 15:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by User:Pegship (notify | contribs).
- It has been replaced by a better image. — WiseKwai 15:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan. I just removed it (and a whole bunch of other wrapper images) from Kit Kat, where they were simply being used in a gallery, which fails points 3 and 8 of the Wikipedia non-free content policy. This particular image claims NoRightsReserved, but it's a candy bar wrapper, and it is very unlikely that the uploader holds the copyright to this design. —Bkell (talk) 17:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I took the photo myself and cropped it down, which is why I used the tag I did, but if doing so infringes the copyright of the wrapper design itself, then do please delete. CLW 17:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by OmniInfoBot (notify | contribs).
- Orphan; image shows nothing (it is solid black). —Bkell (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Colinpcarr (notify | contribs).
- Unsource image giving no evidence that it has been released into the public domain. — Rebelguys2 talk 18:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Blaatkoala (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, unencyclopedic.- Punkmorten 20:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Blaatkoala (notify | contribs).
- Orphan. Unencyclopedic - unclear what purpose it serves in an encyclopedia.- Punkmorten 20:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Blaatkoala (notify | contribs).
- Orphan. Unencyclopedic - unclear what purpose it serves in an encyclopedia.- Punkmorten 20:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Blaatkoala (notify | contribs).
- Orphan. Unencyclopedic - unclear what purpose it serves in an encyclopedia.- Punkmorten 20:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Blaatkoala (notify | contribs).
- Orphan. Unencyclopedic - unclear what purpose it serves in an encyclopedia.- Punkmorten 20:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Apparently cropped from an album cover, but not being used to illustrate the album in question. Also this is an image of a living person which merely shows what he looks like. See the eighth, and maybe the second, example of unacceptable use. —Bkell (talk) 22:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Appears to be cropped from an album cover, therefore violating free use since it's used on the Charlie Christian article and not on the article about the album that it was the cover of. — Corvus cornix 23:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Bigdaddy1204 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 23:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Kumarrajendran (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chrisjbetts (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chrisjbetts (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chrisjbetts (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Metal Pokey (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chrisjbetts (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chrisjbetts (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chrisjbetts (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chrisjbetts (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely non-free logo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Zappycomicz (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Girisriramin (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Seanutbutter (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Chiranjeevisingh (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, likely should be tagged as non-free logo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Forsakenrecords (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Forsakenrecords (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Forsakenrecords (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Forsakenrecords (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Forsakenrecords (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic, likely should be tagged non-free User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Forsakenrecords (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Forsakenrecords (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- - uploaded by Writerandeditor (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
