User talk:Nehrams2020/Archive 7
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Superbadmp.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Superbadmp.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted image, orphaned. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lionkingcharacters.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Lionkingcharacters.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted image, orphaned. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stuck On You film.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Stuck On You film.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC) Readded image, previously removed due to vandalism. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you...
[edit]for the Film Portal welcome; happy to be here. See you soon, Shir-El too 05:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Newsletter
[edit]Thanks for the heads up on the next newsletter. I was wondering about some kind of monthly report for the task forces. I'm not sure what to report, though. Perhaps just report the total number of articles covered? — WiseKwai 05:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
GA reviews
[edit]Hi there,
I noticed that you have been performing GA re-reviews. Two of them fall within the scope of WikiProject New York City: Tompkins Square Park Police Riot (1988), which you have already demoted, and Collapse of the World Trade Center, which is to be demoted shortly. On the one hand, I think you deserve a lot of credit for your care and thoroughness in taking on a "mop-up" task that very few editors would volunteer for. But by the same token, I think the process is flawed.
In the first place, there is very little difference between the GA criteria as you interpret them, and FA criteria. If your suggested fixes to Collapse of the World Trade Center were made, it would be as good an article as many that have passed FA recently. This is one of the main problems with the GA process: depending on the reviewer, it is sometimes almost as arduous as the FA process, with the exception that a single individual gets to make the decision.
In the second place, I think your deadlines are too tight, and somewhat artificial. Does it not seem passing strange that, during the week between Christmas and New Year's, you would announce a one-week deadline for an article to be "fixed," or else it will be demoted from GA status? Is it not possible that editors have other things going on in their lives at this time of year? Some Wikipedia editors toss out arbitrary one- or two-week deadlines quite casually, as if it is of earth-shattering importance that something or other be decided so quickly.
Let me again stress that I think Wikipedia needs more editors doing the kind of work that you do. I just think the process needs some re-thinking. Lastly, I would add that I have never edited the articles mentioned above (and don't intend to), so I have no personal ax to grind with respect to either one of them. Marc Shepherd (talk) 19:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Back again...
[edit]Would like someone knowledgeable to check it out: added Plot section to 42nd Street, removed tag, and added lyrics of the title song. Hope to take care of cast & crew as well. BTW how to go about upgrading the importance rating? This movie had a profound effect on the movie industry. Happy New Year, Shir-El too 04:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- I appreciate your time. I'll stay with 42nd Street for a while and will not ask your opinion again till I can't look at it without feeling cross-eyed.
- "Considering the importance parameter, our project is likely going to phase it out since there has been disagreements over certain films' importance, and it would probably be best to remove it to avoid continuous discussions over it." Please clarify: phase out the "importance parameter" or the film? (One measure of this particular film's importance is that it saved Warner Bros. from bankruptcy.) If the parameter, that would be a wise decision. All the best, Shir-El too 22:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
GA review tasks at collapse of the World Trade Center completed
[edit]Please have a look. Thanks for the spur to action.--Thomas Basboll (talk) 14:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Nehrams, I might recommend you postpone your proposed continuance of keeping this article listed as a GA. It has a lot of serious issues currently which might not be readily apparent to those who don't know what the full details are. Though the article is decent the main issues revolve around violations of the undue weight clause of NPOV as well as violations of SYNTH and NOT. It's not impossible these things may get straightened out shortly, but I doubt it. Be patient as this is an ongoing problem. Thanks.--MONGO 08:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Newsletter?
[edit]Is it true that the December newsletter for Wikproject Films is ready? If so, I haven't been able to find it. (PS: Thanks for the welcome into the project.) Happy New Year! Happy New Year! Yippie! Hooray! Happy New Year! Should auld acquaintance be forgot/And never brought to mind?/Should auld acquaintance be forgot/ And. . . Oops, sorry about that...got carried away again. Thanks again for the welcome. — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 18:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- By the way, given your valuable contributions to the Film Wikiproject, I thought I could ask for your assistance. I've recently submitted two articles for peer review, and thought that you might like to critique them:
- Duck Soup. I've listed this article for peer review because, even though I and other editors have contributed much information and references, I'm certain that there are other aspects of this classic film that have yet to be covered. I'd like to hear feedback from you, so that I can get help in improving this (and other Marx Brothers films) quality.
- Princess Leia Organa. I've listed this article for peer review because it right now seems oddly cluttered and, despite a lot of references as of now, lacks reliable source citations. Although I've already requested another peer review, as long as it helps the articles get better, I've got the time. Comments and suggestions are appreciated, as this should help me in expanding other Star Wars-centric articles.
- If you have the time, it'd be great if you could look over those two articles and assess their strengths and weaknesses. Thanks, and (once again!) a Happy New Year to you! — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 18:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the advice. Concerning your comments on the Princess Leia article, I went ahead and copy-edited your comments at the peer review page for that article. I hope you don't mind; I went ahead and duplicated any relevant information you provided verbatim, as well as your time stamp. In any case, thanks, and a Happy New Year to you, too! — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 19:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 04:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
WikiProject Films December 2007 Newsletter
[edit]The December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the GA Review. I addressed all of your points and noted them on the talk page. Cirt (talk) 02:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC).
History of the Highlanders GA review
[edit]Hi, hopefully I've addressed all your problems. I've commented at the talk page. Thanks. - Shudde talk 09:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
KitKat Crescent
[edit]Thanks for the review on KitKat Crescent. I've now gone through your comments the best I can, hopefully about there now. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Bath GA review
[edit]Thanks for your GA review of Bath, Somerset. Thanks to a variety of editors we have made a range of changes to improve the article & hopefully meet your concerns. Perhaps you would be kind enough to take another look & let us know if there is anything else you feel needs to be improved.— Rod talk 20:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help with this.— Rod talk 08:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Tyrone Wheatley GA on hold
[edit]I have attempted to resolve your concerns on Tyrone Wheatley.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 01:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I addressed all of your points, and noted them at Talk:Lost Our Lisa. Cirt (talk) 08:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC). Thanks. I've noticed all your hard work with all of the reviewing you do, you're doing a great job, and you bring up some good points in the reviews, so I can tell you put thought into them. Thanks again, Cirt (talk) 10:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC).
- I know what you mean about the WP:GAN backlog, I try to pitch in and review a bit, particularly when I add new self-nominations, but it can be daunting. Speaking of which, I've asked for a second opinion on a review I gave at Talk:Invasion of the Bane, feel like chipping in over there? Cirt (talk) 10:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC).
Hello. I have seen to your concerns regarding the GA review of the above article. If there is anything I've missed, feel free to let me know. Cheers, Chris.B (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ten items or less poster.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Ten items or less poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Rock Band (video game) GA review
[edit]After reducing images, fixing text you complained and replacing a ref, see if anything else is needed for it to pass. igordebraga ≠ 23:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Al Wistert GA on hold
[edit]I believe I have responded to your suggestions for Al Wistert.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 18:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Gerlachovský štít GA on hold
[edit]Hi there. I thought you may want to check "on hold" progress on the article written above and maybe comment what's yet necessary. MarkBA what's up?/my mess 20:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]
|
Thanks for your support | |
| Thank you SO MUCH for your support in my unanimous RFA. Take this cookie as a small token of my appreciation.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
noitulovE review
[edit]Ta muchly for the review on noitulovE. I've done my best to fix the issues raised (I'm still not sure how I missed the two dangling sentence fragments!), and left a note regarding potential images on the article's talk page. Let me know if there's anything else to be done on it. And if you enjoyed reading the article, you may want to take a look at Evolution (Dove), which I wrote along the same lines and is also awaiting independent review (shameless plug). GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 10:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
RE:Zimbabwe
[edit]Many thanks to all your help with our GA review. It is very satisfying to see that all my edits have been worth it. Many thanks 
Mangwanani (talk) 16:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I believe every issue was addressed, when possible. Please check Talk:Hans-Joachim Marseille. Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 21:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Request for comment on Category Redirect template
[edit]Because you are a member of WikiProject Categories, your input is invited on some proposed changes to the design of the {{Category redirect}} template. Please feel free to view the proposals and comment on the template talk page. --Russ (talk) 21:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Jon Vaughn GA on hold
[edit]I have addressed the concerns I could at Jon Vaughn. His personal life remains a bit of a mystery and the image is not to be found in the public domain.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 14:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- The choices are 1.) Leave it alone until someone can cite it properly, 2.)rm tag, or 3.) rm tag and text and move citation query to talk page. I had chosen 1, but 3 is the next best alternative.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 22:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- moved to talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 23:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
I believe I have fixed the minor issues. --NE2 04:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Shining Path. While I have not corrected everything that you mentioned, I have made a series of edits to improve the overall quality of the article. I hope that other editors improve the article before the week is up so that it can remain a Good Article. Feel free to review my recent edits and let me know what you think. Thanks a lot. --Descendall (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
GAN Reviewer of the Week
[edit]
|
The Good Article Medal of Merit | |
| Congratulations, I have chosen you as my GAN Reviewer of the Week for the week ending 12th January 2008. Epbr123 (talk) 13:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
I've updated the article to bring it in line with your suggested changes, including a new "Background" section. While the {{main}} template for the section may be slightly unnecessary at the moment (the section is pretty much as long as the entire CFRB article), I intend to expand the Campaign article at some point in the future, probably once I'm done with Onslaught, Amy, Little Girls and Daughters. As with noitulovE, there aren't really any free use images around. Advertising/Marketing folk and the Free Culture movement don't tend to overlap very often (which is fairly understandable, I suppose), so freely licensed photographs of the ceremonies are pretty hard to come by. In any event, let me know if anything else needs changing! GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 19:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Help with image
[edit]Hey, i kinda need help putting and image to a film page, i cannot do it because i live in other country, and copyright doesnt let me do it.
The Film Is Elizabethtown —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjmorabrenes (talk • contribs) 23:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for writing this article about the Ralph Nader documentary. I have a question about the term "...no nukes...". Does that refer to nuclear power plants or nuclear weapons? I think it would be great if we could make a simple change to the article to clarify this. Thanks
Mikiemike (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)--
Thanks
[edit]I do want to Join the Movie Proyect, i have seen this movie More, and the article is really small, I think i would help in some cases :).
Building a core
[edit]User:Girolamo_Savonarola/core is what I've got so far. I still need to check the links and create a column with the current article class, but for now, at least you can get an idea of what the list would look like. The other main task is to figure out how to determine the remainder of the task force picks. Anyway, it's a start. Lemme know what you think. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Nittany Furnace
[edit]With the help and suggestions of User:GaryColemanFan and User:Ruhrfisch, I believe your concerns have been answered and Nittany Furnace is ready to become a GA. Choess (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review! This is actually my first GA, and I appreciate your help in getting it promoted. Choess (talk) 01:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:310toYumaCastPic.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:310toYumaCastPic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong
[edit]Last March, you reviewed and passed the above as a good article. It contained a section headed "notable incident". I have some concerns about the section, which are stated in the talk page. I was wondering whether you considered the issue at the time of your review, and what your take on it is. Ohconfucius (talk) 05:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
American films
[edit]Terrible idea. I'm extremely pissed off that nobody has bothered to help me build the lists and then I get loonies like PD Thor asking why the lists aren't complete and proposing to nuke them all in favour of over a hundred new catrgories. See this ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 13:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Shining Path
[edit]Hello, thanks for your review of Shining Path. I think most issues pointed out in the review have been successfully addressed so feel free to check it again any time you like. --Victor12 (talk) 18:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Core nearly ready
[edit]Have a look when you can - I've filled in the general task force lists now, so it's essentially complete. I've also added a lot more text. This isn't necessarily all going onto the Core subpage when it goes to WP Film - a lot of the background is really just going to be used for the community rollout when this goes public. The contest will probably also get split to its own page or maybe part of Spotlight (since it will be tied in with some new awards). I've also planned for the annual contest to have real-world prizes, namely gift certificates. I'm gonna just pledge maybe $20 or so to the pot, but it would be nice if a bunch of editors can just pledge a bit, like $5 each. Obviously that's a purely voluntary thing, but it would be a nice bit to add to the Bounty Board too (and maybe get some more advertisement/new editors). The quarterly contest will just have its own specific wiki-awards, something like gold/silver/bronze, and probably we'll need some variants for people winning it multiple times. I think we can probably find some editor who likes to design awards before the end of the first quarter.
Anyway, have a look and let me know. Hopefully we should be able to start this up very shortly! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Trinity
[edit]I put some comments on the article talk page. Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Drew Carrey Image
[edit]The picture looks great. I swear it wasn't cropped when I saw it this morning back on there. Its the most recent image you are right. I'll let it be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.117.131.34 (talk) 00:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for that, the recognition comes actually at an opportune time to cheer me up amidst some bull-baiting/trolling. It's nice to know that someone values my contributions to this project. Cirt (talk) 00:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
| Please accept this invitation to join WikiProject Los Angeles Rams, a team subproject of WikiProject National Football League dedicated to improving the quality of Los Angeles Rams related articles. Simply click here to accept! |
--Pinkkeith (talk) 06:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Alexander Litvinenko poisoning - GA review.
[edit]Thanks for taking the time to review Alexander Litvinenko poisoning for WP:GAC - I have made the necessary changes, perhaps you could spare a moment to give it another look. Many thanks. SteveBaker (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Could this be the entry on the Internet Movie Database you saw? TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 23:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh and by the way I agree. I thought before I saw the movie it would be anything special. But when I watched it, it wasn't. Don't respond to that, because I don't really wanna discuss that movie. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 10:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: Release date
[edit]Tough call... I know that 300 has 2006 on its IMDb page, but it's usually perceived as a 2007 release. I don't think that Cleaner has really had an actual release, considering that its Rotten Tomatoes page only has five reviews. A film with this kind of cast would warrant more attention, it seems. I think it may be more appropriately recognized as a 2008 film. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Core List etc.
[edit]Looks like I've opened the discussion. Will try to visit more often. Shir-El too 15:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bridgetoterabithiaposter.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Bridgetoterabithiaposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Issue resolved. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 06:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chicago ten.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago ten.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Somebody didn't fix links after moving the page, issue resolved. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar!
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| This is to acknowledge all the good work you've been doing on WP, for more than two years now. Thank you! Johnfos (talk) 00:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC) |
Grammer
[edit]>>"I have been working in (or is it on?) my sandbox for the last few days developing a guide for editors that nominate articles at GAN. "<<
I think "in" is correct. To work "on" somthing, makes that thing the subject of the work. In your example, sandbox is not the subject of the work, the guide is. So you were working "on" the guide "in" your sandbox! huji—TALK 20:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
More coordinator discussion
[edit]...is now available. Your comments are requested at your convenience. Hope you've been doing well! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 08:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the sluggish response, but I have finally replied since your last comments! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rabbit Jeff Koons.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Rabbit Jeff Koons.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Film award
[edit]I've given Luigi Bob the coveted film barnstar. He has along history of quality edits and if you check his edits you;ll see what I mean by quality. The articles he has worked on really show a sign of class and WP:Films should be glad there are editors like him on here improving some of the stubs into decent articles. Hope you are well. Interestingly my sister is in San Diego this very minute. She's been living in Pallo Alto in the north for about 8 months but shes on a weeks leave down in San Diego. Hope you are well and the studies are coming on good ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 01:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:R.K.M. & Ken-Y-Masterpiece.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:R.K.M. & Ken-Y-Masterpiece.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Scaled rbmp.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Scaled rbmp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Citizen Kane
[edit]I am exploring the possibility of improving Citizen Kane (starting with my subpage, and I was wondering if you could copy and paste the last revision of Citizen Kane in popular culture (as you did for Fight Club) at that subpage. I'd like to go through it and see if I can't track down secondary sources to put together a more coherent "Cultural impact" section. Let me know if you can accomplish this. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the intrusion but could you look at this article? A series of anon IPs (same person based on comments) has added an unusual addition under popular culture with no attribution other than his/her viewpoint/OR. Of a more serious nature, the editor has also made inappropriate comments on the article's discussion page and my talk page. Thanks for your assistance. FWIW, I may be asking a number of admins for their review of the article. Bzuk (talk) 19:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC).
WikiProject
[edit]How does one go about starting and creating a WikiProject page? Creamy3 (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
GA or FA?
[edit]hello, I was wondering whether Battle of Gettysburg would be a featured article...It seems like it could be, compared to how it looked the last time it was nominated. I wanted to know if you thought it would be :) as you reassesed the article not too long ago as a good article. Thanks Mathwhiz 29 (talk) 06:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks :)Mathwhiz 29 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProjects
[edit]Thanks for the information. Creamy3 (talk) 20:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Hilary Duff FAC
[edit]You were the GA reviewer who helped by provding constructive inputs to Hilary Duff article which helped in promotion of the article to GA status. Since then, the article has gone thru some more changes and now i have enlisted the article for FA status. Before that i had listed it for peer review but no major objections were raised. I was wondering if u could go thru the article and leave some feedback at WP:FAC#Hilary Duff.....thanx Gprince007 (talk) 08:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Congrats on reaching 100 GA sweeps!
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| Though you certainty deserve riches beyond your imaginings and whatever divine reward would be your preference, I'm afraid both have been lost in the post. Instead, I hope you'll accept this humble barnstar in recognition of sweeping 100 good articles and helping to maintain some semblance of standards on this here 'pedia. --jwandersTalk 02:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
Yup, what he said. Congratulations from me too! EyeSereneTALK 12:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- I knew this is going to be a long process, lol. If you find some people suitable to sweep, please invite them in. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Thanks!
[edit]Hi Nehrams: Thanks for putting the first WP:BIRD newsletter onto the newsletter list; that was a page I didn't even know existed! : ) MeegsC | Talk 09:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
TS Vamei 01 GA on hold
[edit]Hey, I got a quick question. I'm a little busy in RL right now, but I'm going on spring break this Friday, meaning 7 days of Wikipedia, hopefully. Do you think it'd be OK if Vamei could be on hold until Sunday, perhaps? I plan on doing a big cleanup/possible revamping probably Friday night. Cheers. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 06:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, Tropical Storm Vamei is finished. Could you look at it again? The article is quite different from when you first reviewed it. Cheers. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Oklahoma City Bombing GA Sweeps review
[edit]The overall article looks good. I am just questioning why there's the Notes and References sections, as well as "further reading". Is it possible to merge these 3 sections together? OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- It is kept as GA. OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
History of South Carolina GA changes
[edit]I wasn't a major contributor on this article but am trying to add cites where I can and will try to get other editors involved to make suggested changes. --Parkwells (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fgmuppetcameo.png)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Fgmuppetcameo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
- Image deleted, editor who added new image did not put this up for deletion. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bladesofgloryscr.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Bladesofgloryscr.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
- Readded image to article, removed tag. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Stand.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:The Stand.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
- Image deleted, editor who added new image did not put this up for deletion. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ironmantheaterposter.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Ironmantheaterposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
- Image deleted, editor who added new image did not put this up for deletion. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
My userpage
[edit][1] - Yeah...I like mistakes...*shifty eyes* Thanks for the fixes! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 09:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Predator face2.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Predator face2.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Question on refs
[edit]I'm working on the GA review tornado article that you tagged, and a lot URL's on the refs no longer exist. Does this mean that the ref is no longer valid? thanks, Gopher backer (talk) 12:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Oklahoma City bombing
[edit]Looking at the flurry of recent edits to Oklahoma City bombing, I think we have a problem. Some of the newly added text (and sources) appear to contradict existing text and sources (such as the number of barrels in the Ryder truck and their contents). Likewise some of the new sources appear to be used for WP:SYN (such as the thermobaric effects of the explosion). Your thoughts? --Kralizec! (talk) 12:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films coordinator elections
[edit]The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Template:European cinema
[edit]Hi hope you are well. I was thinking about adjusting the large side plate Template:European cinema to collapse into a small box where you click on it to widen. I;ve seen it done to the Buddhism template. Its rather domineering to the articles I think . E.g see Template:Tibetan Buddhism What do you think? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 22:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
RFA thanks
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for the support |
| Thanks for your support on my request for adminship, which passed 92/2/2. I'll learn the ways of the mop, and be sure to live up to the expectations of the community. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC) |
Newsletterbot
[edit]Whoops Thanks for catching that. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Have A ...
[edit]
Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
--Cinemaniac (talk • contribs • critique) 03:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: Camille
[edit]Thanks! Yea, being an admin is turning out pretty cool, and I'm glad I made the decision. Also, thanks for your reviews across our project. Regarding Camille, I think there is simply too much work to be done, and I think it needs a large re-working. Since someone may surprise me and work on it, I won't delist it. Rather, I'll let it run its course. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)