User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 99

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).

Wondering why your pages were speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Please check the page Karan Singh Grover by yourself

The red pen of doom and a few other biased fans of other celebrities has something against the page Karan Singh Grover they have removed loads of encyclopaedic information without any consensus, please since you are administrator you should have a look at things rather than assuming and being blind to some editors — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.23.217.93 (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Migosyrtrill

Hi Nawlin. Please peruse Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Migosyrn. We are dealing with a troll. If you proceeding to block his socks, my suggestion is WP:DENY and block without message. He is very bent. Optakeover ^(Talk) 15:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see that now, thanks. Talk page blocked, and I've made an edit filter adjustment that may help. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lope-Z

Wtf bro you keep deleting my page !! Can you please stop doing that ? it's really annoying of you Schoolboyq tde (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because Lope-Z isn't notable, see WP:MUSIC, and because we don't need another copy of The Game (rapper). NawlinWiki (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, AFLG Investments Private Equity...

...has been recreated. —George8211 / T 16:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nawlin

Suggested changes re Fireplace on Talk page, what do you think? Sorry about charging in, new to this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pat232323 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's how you do it. I've responded on that talk page. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

APPSeCONNECT page creation

Hi Nawlin Wiki,

I have been creating the page for APPSeCONNECT but during editing, I have published the page. Is saving a page publishes it online ? I was trying to modify the page by removing contents and giving citations but it has been deleted now.

Can you please help me on how to proceed ? Abhi2434 (talk) 18:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Insync page deletion

Hi Nawlin,

I have just noticed that the page Insync is also been deleted. I have created the page without any advertisement and tried to put citation. Can you please remove the deleting tag, and let me know what should I need to edit to make that page active.

Please help me. Abhi2434 (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Davidson Jr.

HI i've been trying to create one of my idols wikipedia but you keep deleting it why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elvisdamien (talk • contribs) 01:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because you haven't cited reliable sources, or indeed any sources, to show that this 13-year old is notable, see our guidelines at WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hiromi Tango wikipedia page

Hi -- I was asked by Hiromi Tango to create a wikipedia page, after someone else had tried and it was deleted. We just spent the last couple of hours creating content that was sourced from Hiromi's website, hiromitango.com, most of which I have edited personally over the years. We got a message that it was deleted due to copyright infringement on materials on the Sullivan Strumpf website, who represent her. Ironically, the Sullivan Strumpf website uses written material that we have generated for Hiromi's personal website. How can we resolve this? 161.184.224.39 (talk) 01:37, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles need to be supported by independent sources, see WP:RS, not by the subject's own website or that of her agents. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

River + Wolf speedy deletion -

Hi NawlinWiki, Regarding the speedy deletion of the "river + wolf" page, I worked very closely with 2 wiki pages of similar companies in the same field (1st)(2nd), in order to write according to the wiki rules. Can you guide me what were the parts that were not suitable in the page? how can I edit this subject so it will be approved? Thanks! shkd109.65.181.206 (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion of page "The Hit House"

Hi NawlinWiki, I would really appreciate it if you would undo the delete of the page "The Hit House", or, alternately, let me know what I can do to change it so it corrects any problems you feel are occurring. To address your issues with it, first of all, I feel like your assertion of "No credible indication of importance" is unfair, as this musical company has created music for some of the biggest blockbuster movies of our time (as indicated in the article), including Disney's "Frozen", "Minions", and a very successful campaign for the Playstation 3 game "Bloodborne". This is supported in a linked article from Daily Variety, as well as Trailermusicweekly.com, both independent and verifiable sources. It is also just a start, with more information coming soon. As far as "Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-hit-house", it was a mistake for me to add that link, but, if you look in the history of the page, you'll see that that was added after it was flagged in a misguided attempt to assuage the flag of copyright infringement. While there is similar language in both pages, at the end of the day you'll see that they are both simply basic descriptions of the company, and it was not, in fact, copied from it. I will of course be happy to remove that link. Thank you very much in advance and I appreciate your hopefully understanding. Plug81 (talk) 18:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Being a vendor (even a music vendor) for notable companies or films does not confer notability - otherwise, we would have articles for every catering company, electric supply company, etc. that ever worked on a notable film. The Trailermusic cite is just the company's list of trailers. The Variety article is about the specific use of a song in a trailer, and is not primarily about The Hit House. Furthermore, the article was promotional (listing the music collections that Hit House offers for sale). NawlinWiki (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Being a vendor in and of itself doesn't, you're right, but creating music that goes on to propel the advertising of those movies in trailers (which many publications, such as "Vulture", "The Atlantic", "The Huffington Post", and many others have recently written about being an art form in and of themselves) and commercials that reach and are enjoyed by hundreds of millions of people absolutely signifies notability. And, I'm sorry, but to argue that music serves a similar purpose in people's lives to catering or electricity supply on a film set is, I feel, a quite faulty assertion. You might remember a great meal from the catering table for a few days or even weeks, and lighting can briefly affect your emotional state, but people remember a good song (even a piece of trailer or advertising music, which has attracted a following throughout the world) forever. Also, The Variety article is about a specific song that made it into a trailer because of the work done on it by The Hit House, and the Trailermusic site is, yes, an independently curated list of major movies containing music created by The Hit House. Furthermore, the collections listed are not in fact for sale to the public, so therefore that cannot constitute being promotional by your reasoning. A simple web search or iTunes search will show you that The Hit House has a few select things for sale, but not anything listen on the site. And, finally, there are several other similar pages on Wikipedia, including this one for Immediate Music https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immediate_Music. It is, of course, slightly more fleshed out, but is the exact same concept and type of information. So, overall, I understand how you would have had those initial concerns, but I believe that they are ultimately unfounded and I would appreciate it if you'd please let the page be. Plug81 (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Speedy deletion of page "Identix Incorporated"

Hello. Could you please identify exactly what it is about the Identix Incorporated page that justifies a speedy deletion? There is no doubt in my mind that Identix Incorporated is absolutely a piece of history and needs to be added to Wikipedia. It is not only a precursor to L-1 Identity Solutions (a page already long established), but it was a leader in the biometric identification industry. It was a publicly traded company for over 17 years. There are plenty of reliable references to support the addition of the Identix Incoporated page to the Wikipedia site. If you have any specific issues that I can address, I would be more than happy to make edits to the context. But by completely deleting the page, you are single-handedly repressing a very important part of history. Identixfan6 (talk) 12:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The entire thing was written in a promotional, laudatory tone ("Today, Identix products are used around the world..." etc.). See WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Although it's true (they are used around the world), I will edit appropriately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Identixfan6 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please re-open the Identix Incorporated page so I could try posting some more appropriate content? Right now it only redirects to L-1 Identity Solutions page. Thank you. Identixfan6 (talk) 23:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Identixfan6 (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, NawlinWiki. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 07:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

Sorry about that. Surely you know what happened, I PROD'd just as you moved the page, so Twinkle templated you... anyway I think pages like this should go as a user subpage or in the draftspace as userpages are not intended for drafts. Just my two cents! Best — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I get it, no problem! NawlinWiki (talk) 16:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you ever use IRC? If you do, mind getting on right now? I'm in the admin room. This is about different matters... — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

apex predators

hello, i have been deleting the hyenas and wild dog from the list because they do have predators: big cats. TheFeralCat (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable source to cite for this? NawlinWiki (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anthony Russian

Hi Nawlin. I was trying to create the AFLG Investments Private equity page, but it kept getting deleted because there wasn't a reference to back up it's importance. There was a news article that talked about our company and our success so far. http://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/blog/morning-edition/2015/04/quiet-private-equity-firm-expects-brazilian.html. If I include this would that be suffice to keep the page from being taken down? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony.russian (talk • contribs) 17:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First, that sort of local business-journal coverage doesn't make a company notable per our standards, see WP:CORP and WP:V. Second, you appear to be writing an article about your own company, which is discouraged, see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Transatlanick

Hey Nawlin. I'm attempting to create a TimeLine Video wikipedia page, but it was speedy deleted due to the fact that the page "did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant." I have to strongly disagree, and believe that the page met all of the WP:N guidelines. Broadcast/Digital media is recognized as an art form, and I believe TimeLine Video's extensive list of awards from recognized authorities in the industry meets the criteria for notability. Despite being a newer art form, we still recognize and celebrate award winning advertisements from years passed (think the famous Coca-Cola Hilltop ad from 1971) meaning it is likely that TimeLine Video's notability is not temporary. Transatlanick (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Transatlanick[reply]

There were only two sources listed for the awards, and one of them expressly stated that they were awards for agencies with limited books of business. I don't see that these are notable awards for purposes of WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- If it makes the page stronger, i'll go through and reference every single award. Many of them are significant achievements. When I recreate the page, if you still believe it doesn't meet the criteria, I'd appreciate it if you'd nominate it for deletion rather than speedy delete, as I believe there should at least be a discussion that takes place over the issue. With much appreciation for your commitment to improve and moderate the Wikipedia project, I hope you consider this. Transatlanick (talk) 21:47, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Transatlanick[reply]

Akuniyo

Akuniyo seems to have been making some odd edits lately. I notice you've reverted a few. Their behaviour seems to be similar to Stevertigo, who was blocked indefinitely following this ANI discussion. Of particular note are their edits to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Stevertigo and Wikipedia:Ratings and rankings system. This looks quite like a sock to me, but I'm unsure whether an ANI post or SPI investigation is most appropriate, and am slightly uncomfortable doing either without hard evidence. Since you've noticed at least some of this person's behaviour, I'm wondering whether you can give me any advice. — Bilorv_(talk)^(c)(e) 20:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's him all right. Blocked, thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 20:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Balancing Act TV Show - Speedy Deletion

Hi Nawlin. I just (and I mean JUST) posted a page titled, The Balancing Act TV Show. You noted the use of the word "proud" in the description of their award acquisitions, and I was hoping I would be able to repost once it has been removed. Please advise at User talk:B.Star1516. Thank you!

B.Star1516 (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just the one word. "The entertaining yet informative segments"... "Danielle's vast experience".... and then there's the peppy list of show segments. The whole thing needs to be pared down and written from a neutral point of view. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bam Barcena Page

Hi Nawlin,

The page for Bam Barcena that I was editing was deleted for not having enough secondary sources. I was in the process of finding more references for the wiki page and was wondering if there was a way to have the page back up again? If not, is there any way to retrieve the information? Thanks!

Catchword branding page deletion

hey there!

I was recently editing the Wikipedia page for catchword branding. I noticed that a few days ago you deleted the page, citing the A7 rule, which is meant to prevent organizations that are not notable from having pages about them. Catchword is a very notable naming agency with offices in Oakland and NYC. You can check out their website at catchwordbranding.com. Was the page deleted because of the edits I made? If so, is it possible to revert the article to a previous version? Sorry if I made a mistake. I'm new to Wikipedia and I was just trying to make their page more up to date. Jrendleman (talk) 01:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The sources cited in the article were about branding in general, and quoted or mentioned Catchword, but were not *about* Catchword. That's not the sort of sourcing needed to show notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by 2601:601:600:4E4C:24C6:58C8:7FD4:51DA

I need to make an urgent request for User:2601:601:600:4E4C:24C6:58C8:7FD4:51DA to be blocked because he is still vandalizing as of this moment. 2602:306:3357:BA0:14B8:B3F4:8A0:185E (talk) 03:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proper warning for AIV

Hi NawlinWiki. You were the last admin to delete a repeatedly created WP:AUTOBIO called K-AL (and a copy K-AL BEATS), created by Variouskal. I took it to AIV but it was declined for insufficient or improper warnings. I thought all the speedy notices, {{uw-autobiography}} and my own custom warning were enough, but apparently I was wrong. Does one always have to follow the level 1-4 warning progression before AIV admins will take action? I can just see this user not stopping, and recreating this article again. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 22:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drm. While I don't think the 1-4 progression must always be strictly followed, this user has been given no warning that he might be blocked if he continues. Asking him to stop, as you did, is the equivalent of a level 2 warning. If the user reposts, feel free to give a level 3 or 4 warning (subst:uw-create3 or 4), and to let me know that you did. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

king mez

fyi, that article just went through DRV and came out as recreation. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am trying to create a page for a subject [King Mez/Morris Ricks II] mentioned in this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton_(album) I do not understand why I'm not able to create a page. There are plenty of online sources. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freshheirs00 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see (although I can't seem to link to the DRV discussion). I've reinstated the article. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Freshheirs00 (talk) 02:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2015_July_29 Gaijin42 (talk) 02:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My page

Hi NawlinWiki. I saw you had deleted my page Niccolò Fedrigo. I tryed to add more second parts source as Rob suggested to me (there were 12) Lots I suppose for just few lines. But I really still don't understand what's wrong with that. How you can consider not relevant a professional like me? I don't wanna be rude but just understand cause I can see ridiculous pages with no sources and missing links like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niccolò_Ferrari but I can't be honest with you writing a information article about my person. I have to related myself to someone else? This can helps? Please let me know. Thank you. Nickfedrigo (talk) 12:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We do frown on people writing about themselves, because it's very hard to keep from being promotional. See WP:AUTO and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:55, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic username

== Re: Speedy deletion of page "The Hit House" ==Shouldn't the user WikiSeniorEditor2010 be blocked for misleading username? —George8211 / T 14:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G6 page deletions/restoration

Hey, just curious what is accomplished by page deletions and immediate restorations such as you did at Masta Killa yesterday. The edit summary says ‎"G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup", but the G6 page doesn't really give a lot of detail, and doesn't address any situations where the page is then restored immediately. This is really just a curiosity thing since I see it occur occasionally on several pages I watch; please ping me if you reply here. Thanks! Antepenultimate (talk) 15:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See here. This vandal is like a graffiti tagger, and I'm cleaning up the tags. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Circuits Cloud - Proposed for deletion

Hi dear Nawlin, may I know why this page (Circuits Cloud) is scheduled for deletion although I have provided all the software information and the necessary references? It is scheduled for deletion under the reason "Nonnotable software". Please reply me what kind of edits it should be subjected to in order to lift the deletion proposal. Thanks in advance. H.Marhoon (talk) 17:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion of page "Jordan Flash Rose"

Dear, Nawlin, the page i created on a notable person keeps getting deleted. I even included reliable sources, can you please explain to me what's going on. I'm just trying to help create articles of good people. P.S. i also created a new username as requested. Thank in advance.

The article keeps being deleted because it is promotional and not neutral. The entire tone is telling the world how wonderful Mr. Rose is. See WP:NPOV. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May I trouble you to help an editor

Hi Nawlin, an editor has asked me to help answer a question that I am not qualified to answer. He's asked via my talk page if I can ask you. I'm not sure how you were picked. I'm not even sure what the question is, but it has to do with edit filters. The question seems to originate at User_talk:Keith_D#Filters_and_tags. Thanks, and sorry. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:20, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you replied to a false positive report - and my questions are based around them. Leeds United FC fan (talk) 07:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Had already seen it

Had already seen that "I have been marked by the clan" (LOL) and went to block them but they were already blocked. -- Alexf^(talk) 18:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding StarTex

NawlinWiki - what is the specific reason(s) for the deletion of StarTex? Sources, relevance, and importance of the organization are stated and cited. Please advise. Shoebacah (talk) 18:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Only the last two sources you cited are independent of the company (well, other than the one that merely shows where their office is), and they discuss EHS software in general, not StarTex. There's nothing in the article to show that the company meets our notability standards, see WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Life is a road, and you are the Rider

That's the shortest prod I've seen - 4 mins. I noticed the other day that prods weren't being flagged after 7 days and wondered if something was wrong with the bot. Peridon (talk) 18:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked user

Two years ago, you unblocked Eblem (talk · contribs). This month he is making edits like this and edits like this. Looking at his block log, I can understand why he was first blocked. Elizium23 (talk) 21:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elizium is posting false allegations of violations of edit wars, profanity, and personal attacks on my Talk page. I have requested that he cease. I assume the above is his response. His selection of one "edit" appears to have purposely left out an earlier version which included context:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pissing_contest

--Eblem (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say that I'm entirely happy with Eblem either; he's pretty abrasive William M. Connolley (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But this may well now be moot [1] William M. Connolley (talk) 22:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well: [2]. --JBL (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Given that he's exercised the right to vanish, I'm not going to do anything at this point. If he edits again, he is subject to a block per the edit cited by Joel B. When I unblocked him, I warned him that any more accusing people of being Nazis would lead to reblocking. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The right to vanish into sockpuppetry, perhaps. Elizium23 (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've created Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eblem. Elizium23 (talk) 00:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tetrick

has been recreated. —George8211 / T 11:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting important pages

Mayi ask you why you deleted gelingeliyor pages. This is one and only wedding planning website all over Turkey. Everyday illion people get service thru that platform and you delete that. Please put that website back or tell me something to fix that. Mystudionet (talk) 12:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article didn't cite any independent sources (see WP:V) to show that this website is notable per our standards, see WP:WEB. Also, the article was in Turkish, so you might want to try the Turkish Wikipedia, tr.wikipedia.org. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit deleted page for resubmission

Hello. I would like to resubmit an edited version of Stevens-Wilkinson page, but do not know how to find the page you deleted. User:Stevens-Wilkinson (Deleted August 2015) — Preceding undated comment added 17:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nobody's enemy

Hi, could you clarify why you blocked this account as block evasion for User:Hamish Ross? I've tagged it as another master, but the account has no edits. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Based on similarity of edits and username pattern. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

You deleted that cosmology page with the long title as a copyvio, but did not say what the source URL was in the deletion log. Was this a mistake? Everymorning (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

Please accept the cheeseburger of knighthood, with an extra portion of the gherkins of chivalry. Or to put it another way, thanks very much for the page protection- it would never have occured to me. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) NawlinWiki (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

As you know (I think), Traphouseiv vandalized my user page several times before being blocked. They then came back with a new account and were blocked again. You then semi-protected my user page. When I look at its edit history, I don't see Traphouseiv's edits anymore. Special:Contributions/Traphouseiv doesn't show the edits either. I also don't see any of the edits reverting the vandalism. What happened? KSFT ^C 20:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I used selective deletion, because this vandal is like a graffiti artist who just likes to "tag" his stuff on Wikipedia again and again. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

OH THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!! I was worried I was gonna have to sit here all day reverting vandalism. BTW, here's something funny. They stopped editing so I checked their block log, nothing. "Damn!", I thought. I went back to the panel, ready to rollback more. (I made an extension to give me the ability) then there was the "This user is blocked notice" Krett12 (talk) 15:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel on Lil Debbie

Just so you know, the standard procedure for deleting revisions has for several years been to use the revision deletion tool instead of deleting the whole page and selectively unrelenting revisions. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for ruining my hard work Wikieditorjon (talk) 21:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you extend my talk page protection please?

I ran into the same bunch of vandals you protected my page against earlier today, and they made reference to my talk page and the fact it had blocked them from trolling on it. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 09:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Basement Effect (Band)

Apologies I am a new author here and originally added a shell page about the band The Basement Effect. The band have references in local newspapers such as the Liverpool Echo and have appeared on Radio Merseyside in an interview, so I presume once I add in these citations this would be enough information to make the page "noteworthy"?

I have since started to re-create the article in my sandbox area with some citations (work in progress) before I re-submit the page, so do I just re-submit this again or do I need you to release the original deleted page?

EricJones1975 (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)EricJones1975EricJones1975 (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if you would let me know when you think the page is ready, so I can look at it. I will caution you that mentions in local papers and placements in local "battles of the bands" don't generally make a band notable per WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about radio interviews and mentions on the BBC website for example the following? https://soundcloud.com/llhanfield/bbcradio (copy of the radio interview) Does that not satisfy the point of "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself."? EricJones1975 (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)EricJones1975EricJones1975 (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal ^talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pressha

Hi, just wondering why this article was protected. Sock puppetry hasn't been an issue, and the article only has a handful of edits in the past five years. (Its most prominent editor is me, hence my concern - was someone complaining about edits I made years ago?) Chubbles (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article was vandalized this morning by a serial sockpuppeteer, but I used Wikipedia:Selective deletion to remove the edits. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I presume the same happened to the 2 Pistols page? Karst (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained above, selective deletion has been obsolete for years. Revision deletion is preferred now. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 22:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mver1979

Mver1979 re: Théâtre français de Toronto Hi Nawlin. You've speedy deleted my page based on assumptions of Copyright infringement. I am the Copyright Holder. I sent permission to wikimedia [Ticket#: 2015090910024281]. Please restore the page.

Even so, it's still advertising/promotion. See WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM. Wikipedia is not a mirror site for your group's official site. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Understood I am removing subjective comments and leaving fact-based only information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mver1979 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection

Thanks for semi-protecting my userpage - but I'm a bit curious why? AFAICT the only other editor to edit it was a new one who didn't know how to find my talk page instead. GoldenRing (talk) 03:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same question here; was my userpage so heavily vandalized today? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Migosyrn socks were after you both. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lot7000

You blocked Lot7000 (talk · contribs), understandably, as yet another Paul Easter sock; but unless you object strongly, I would like to unblock.

Unlike all the others, he didn't just create another article, but arrived at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/SEFPRODUCTIONS saying that he was not Easter and hoped to negotiate a way forward. I have been conducting a dialogue with him there and on his talk page, first telling him to prepare a draft and then, since the edit filters make that difficult, to start by assembling any references he can find to show notability.

I have no idea whether this is actually someone new, or just Easter or one of his previous stable of meatpuppets, but I would like to AGF in the hope that this might, just possibly, be a way to end the endless procession of socks. I note that there have (so far) been no more today, compared to ten or more over the previous two days.

What I plan is to let him assemble his sources, then (I expect) explain to him why they do not show notability to the standard of WP:CREATIVE, but maybe offer to let another draft be presented and passed through AfD to get a definitive answer.

If he goes back to behaving like all the other socks, obviously we re-block. JohnCD (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He's lying. He is obviously Paul Easter (down to the misspellings and the complaints about someone who once implied that he was mentally ill), and he has done this same shtick before. But to give him the chance you're offering, I'll unblock his talk page. You might ask him if he has any interest in contributing anything to Wikipedia other than articles about Paul Easter and his homemade films. If he doesn't, their nonnotability is well-established and I see no point in allowing him to make an argument that's been repeatedly rejected. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since this user has actually stopped to talk to another editor at this point, and might be receptive to ideas about notability and how Wikipedia measures it, perhaps you could leave them to it, instead of stepping in to challenge him about how he's lying and how many friends he has? He's clearly gone on the defensive about your comment and ignored John's, on his talk page. This is only taking a small corner of a user talk page, and we'd all rather it was this than another raft of "okay maybe I'll try spelling my name backwards" sockpuppets where the only discussion is in shortlived edit war edit summaries. --McGeddon (talk) 21:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He's still socking, see User:Ff66890. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly because Lot7000 was blocked with no block message or guidance on what to do next? (I'm not sure what a blocked user sees when they try to edit, but there was nothing on the user talk page.) I don't see any great harm in letting this slide for a few days while we see whether he's amenable to discussing notability, and what points he has to make. He's only editing talk pages, and nobody reading them is under any illusion about what's happening. It'd be nice if he requested a formal unblock at User:Paul Easter and did this by the book, but a temporary sock sitting down to talk to us is still miles better than the heavy article-creation socking he usually goes in for. It'd be a shame if the by-the-book "now log out of this account and use the previous one if you can remember the password for it" blocking frustrated him back into straight vandalism because it was easier. --McGeddon (talk) 16:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did I miss something?

Just wondered about the deletion/restoration of The Mondrian collection of Yves Saint Laurent; did I miss some drama? Mabalu (talk) 09:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See above (the two items above Lot7000). NawlinWiki (talk) 15:11, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	hey Samuelcowboysfan (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mana Products

Hi NawlinWiki, I am the author of the Mana Products page which was removed for lack of notability despite citations to stories in Vanity Fair and Women's Wear Daily, among others. Would appreciate any additional insight and advice. Thanks!

Hmg8654 (talk) 22:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Attack usernames

Hey Nawlin, could I ask a favour? When you come across attack usernames (an all-too-common occurrence in our line of admin work), could you report them to the oversight team? We can remove all trace of them (including from things like SPecial:ListUsers). It's only a big deal for the really nasty ones, but we have some latitude with the less nasty ones because there's no other way of removing them from the automatically generated lists. You blocked one earlier tonight that I've since suppressed. You probably know the one I mean, but if you're confused just drop me an email. All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the page details of Mr Kanihama

The page you have recently deleted is about one of the renouned persons of kashmir who happens to be the patent owner of the weaving craft called kanishawl. Please undelete the page so that I can update its contents. Thank you so much Burhan6220 (talk) 02:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About the user I created

Hello there. I created an account with name 83M and the user seems to dislike you. I'm saying this because, this user sent two requests to the interface (no, their IP is not blocked). One for the username 'NawinWikiSucks' (yes, no 'l' in Nawlin) which was declined per UPol and the second for the username 83M, which I had to create not seeing any problems in the log. I just wanted to notify you on the creation. You may want to closely follow their contributions and open an SPI if you can relate them to any previous block of yours. Regards—☮JAaron95 ^Talk 08:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy

Hello! What word does not go to philosophy? help me

I don't understand this question, sorry. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NawlinWiki. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

"Persistent sock puppetry"

I'm puzzled why you're protecting articles against socks for a week when they haven't any visible edits for months. As a guess, there were lots of socked edits that have now been wiped beyond even revdel. Is this a new policy? Seems quite extreme for minor vandalism. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These are all edits by socks of User:Migosyrn. If those pages aren't protected, he returns to them again and again. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So we revert and ignore, per usual. We have worse socks than that (Europefan) and I've never seen this degree of removal. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How do you feel about protection when the vandal has returned to the same article repeatedly? NawlinWiki (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand the protection, I'm just surprised to see the edits themselves removed (What is this even called?) as more than RevDel. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rezwan Mashid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rezwan Mashid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why has the page Hollinwood fc been delete?

I clearly stated that it is an information page about a Semi-Professional football team based in Greater Manchester which is in the Manchester Football league. Previously one of your users said that the team has to be on a good level of professionality, yet it is on the same level as Chadderton FC and yet they have a Wikipedia page. I class this as a discrimination against Hollinwood FC and clearly your speedy deleters have been ignorant and clearly haven't read my message before they decided to delete my hard work and effort I put in to create the page. Go and delete other pages such as Chadderton FC's if your going to delete my page. Siddiqueahmed96 Siddiqueahmed96 (talk) 03:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nawlins, just so you know, this is also being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Why has the page Hollinwood fc been deleted? Oiyarbepsy (talk) 11:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case, you decide to restore, I'd recommend checking against this pitchero site, which appears to have identical text and (AFAICT) isn't CC-BY-SA compatible. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yunshui for your information this pitchero site that website is Hollinwood FC's official website and authorisation was given to use that text to enter it into the history section on the Wikipedia page. I can guarantee nothing else was copied and it was original work. Also it was referenced on the Wikipedia page that the website was used so you can't penalise the Wikipedia page on Hollinwood FC for that. the Wikipedia page was created to help people who are interested to know and understand who Hollinwood are. And like I have stated before it is a semi professional football team, and it is on the same level as Chadderton FC, who also have a Wikipedia page. So you should go around and delete other semi professional football teams who are on Wikipedia also otherwise that is very unfair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddiqueahmed96 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Siddiqueahmed96 In order to host material here, it most be licensed as creative commons worldwide. Giving Wikipedia-only permissions isn't enough. Generally, semi-pro sports clubs aren't willing to release their marketing materials to be edited by anyone on Earth. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Outarbepsy Hello the club have given authorisation for it to be placed on Wikipedia so please can you tell the user who has decided to delete the page to put it back on cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddiqueahmed96 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Nagler

Hi NawlinWiki I see that you have protected the article Eric Nagler. Unless the protection is about to be removed, could you do me a small favor.

The link washboard is incorrect and should be changed to washboard, i.e., the musical kind

The link spoons is incorrect and should be changed to spoons, i.e., the musical kind

Thanks --Foobarnix (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Made the changes, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking CU Impersonator

Thanks for the revert on my talk page; however, did you forget to block this account? [3] Also, I think an SPI case might want to be made between User:Cheetolover69 and User:Mu23m1k3 because of my talk page history here: [4]. Please ping or leave a talk back on my page upon reply. --JustBerry (talk) 01:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had blocked Cheetolover, and it is definitely blocked now. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello Nawlin, how are you doing? I wanted to ask you that whether my user-page revisions/diffs can be made hidden? I just want the present revision to be visible. Or should I CSD it for U1 and recreate it? Faizan (talk) 07:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can delete the page and recreate with just the present revision -- will that work for you? NawlinWiki (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that will work, thanks. Faizan (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed U1 on it. Can you have a look? Faizan (talk) 17:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, sorry for the delay. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Faizan (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting revisions to clean history

Hi. Just a reminder: when you delete a page to clean the history, please check make sure you don't undelete any previously deleted edits (see Waray language logs). Thanks for all the work you do here. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 14:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Migosyrn

Obviously bored again today. Charming message left on my talk page (now rev del'd). Nthep (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki, pardon the interruption. Re: User talk:Nthep (history · logs), where you hid a username in the edit history, I think that username may still be visible in the edit summary left by SineBot. Regards, – Wdchk (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Got it now, thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh

Think you may have removed the wrong edit summary from the history of Andhra Pradesh leaving the one at 09:28, 18 September 2015‎ - Arjayay (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi I'm Tariq what your name Tariqmuhammad678 (talk) 15:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm NawlinWiki. Welcome! NawlinWiki (talk) 15:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HERO (fashion magazine) improperly deleted?

Hi there. You deleted HERO (fashion magazine) citing A7. The guide for A7 states: "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works." HERO (fashion magazine) is a creative work. Therefore I believe it has been improperly deleted, can it please be reinstated? Many thanks.

Wiki edit 34957130 (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe, but I would say, based on the content of Hero and Heroine, that both were appropriately deleted as advertising as well. I note that all of your edits have related to those two magazines. Do you have a conflict of interest? NawlinWiki (talk) 19:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I don't believe so, I am just a fan of the publications. Do you think HERO (fashion magazine) can be re-instated please? I put a lot of work into it :( They feature lots of my favourite actors. Wiki edit 34957130 (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) You did not put any work into providing even so much as one single solitary source for the article, outside of the subject's own websites. If nobody has written about the publication, if there are no sources describing it, then by definition it is too obscure to have an article about it in a global encyclopedia. If there are such sources, then start a fresh new draft at Draft:Hero (magazine), providing proper sources, and skip the namedropping and the non-encyclopedic lists of who was on each cover. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Point noted, and thanks for your advice, but it would be really generous if the page could be re-instated so you can at least give me a chance to work on the points you mention. I know for pro users like you guys, entering the code and references are second nature but it took me a long time to try and format it all properly. I am all for a well referenced, properly formatted article, but surely you can imagine how disheartening it is for a novice user to have their page deleted, citing a reason (A7) that doesn't apply to it, and then say 'tough luck, start again', when I am showing a willigness to try and do this properly. It literally took me days and days. Honestly. Wiki edit 34957130 (talk) 20:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles are now in your userspace at User:Wiki edit 34957130/Hero (fashion magazine) and User:Wiki edit 34957130/HEROINE magazine. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:16, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Do I now have to move it from here back to where it was, or request this, and what happens to the images I had uploaded? Wiki edit 34957130 (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll undelete the images. Please let me know when you've revised the articles to add reliable independent sources that show that these publications are notable, and I'll take a look. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About the article Skipp Williamson

Hello NawlinWiki

Thank you for your quick review of the article. I could not have expected such a quick result. However, I would have appreciated that you explained to me first before taking such a drastic decision. If you look very closely at the references, you will notice that 2 major Australian newspaper have been appropriately used as references about the subject. In addition, I did not think that it was necessary to support the content with a ton of references to make my point. Therefore, I will very much appreciate that you give me (the newbie) a second chance by speedily restoring the article and requiring that I provide additional sources. As Jimmy Wales himself once said: "Do not bite the newbies". Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. Best regards. Donaldeval (talk) 19:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The AFR articles are subscriber-only, so not very verifiable here. But in general, all the article says is that she runs her own consulting company and has been included on a list of 100 successful businesspeople. That doesn't seem to satisfy WP:BIO. Regardless, I'll put the content in your userspace at User:Donaldeval/Skipp Williamson. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- OK. Thanks NawlinWiki for the comment and action. I appreciate. I am taking constructively the remarks and working some more on the content. Thanks a lot. Donaldeval (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Hi, I noticed you protected my user and talk page again. Was it because of the Migosyrn or whatever clan they claim to be who I had discussed earlier today on Yunshui's talk? -_Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Aah, okie. Thanks. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Farnham Park FC

It is a team that is within the English football pyramid and even minor English football teams tend to be notable since local newspapers use them to pad out their back pages.©Geni (talk) 20:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for looking after my talk page. A true fellow editor - your diligence and hard work in fighting vandalism is much appreciated. JustBerry (talk) 23:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wheel war?. Thank you. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to know why my page was deleted.

Hi!I've just finished collecting my materials and all the materials have sourses. It's a page of a real man with detailed imformation , and I wonder how to say it "no significance".And what can I do next？ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaozeyu (talk • contribs) 13:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Roti canai

Can I ask why you protected Roti canai? There appears to be no sock puppetry. (120.144.12.189 (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Brittani Bo Baker

I need to add a page for Brittani Bo Baker. It was deleted by you. She runs Bubba's Boneless Ribs which she was on ABC's Shark Tank with her father who was an NFL player for the Cleveland Browns. I am new to this process and she has hired me to make page for her for upcoming television appearances. Please let me know how I can have a page for here without getting deleted. Photogirl95 (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Photogirl95Photogirl95 (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) By your own admission, you have a massive conflict of interest, as you are here to promote your client with a series of paid edits, even though you have not performed the mandatory disclosure of your status as a paid editor. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RevDel request

Please consider revdel of this edit. Thanks. General Ization ^Talk 03:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Piirus

I was still in the process of improving the article on this topic when you have deleted this. I have not been given sufficient time to indicate how or why the subject is important or significant just like similar services such as Academia and ResearchGate, both of which have their own Wikipedia articles. Piirus is a service funded by Jobs.ac.uk and University of Warwick so how could this not be significant enough for an encyclopedia article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanderlust1282 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to your userspace at User:wanderlust1282/Piirus -- you can work on it there to find reliable independent sources that demonstrate notability per WP:ORG. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emprego entry

Hi NawlinWiki, can you please provide me more information about the deletion of Emprego entry?

I would also like to retrieve the deleted material for improvement.

Best Regards, Francisco Costa Franciscotcosta (talk) 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There was too much promotional language -- "helps people enrich their lives" and the like. See WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM. I've moved the deleted text to your userspace at User:Franciscotcosta/Emprego. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

VJ Books

Trying to figure out why this page was labelled for "Speedy Deletion"

I am a book collector and they are a group that has some great resources and has published unique titles by Clive Cussler ( a HUGE name in fiction ). Given that Abebooks, Alibris, and Biblio.com, all have pages I don't understand why an online seller and notable publisher wouldn't be listed.

I've worked for 2 weeks finding information and sources for what was posted. I would love some clarity, as this was not meant to be an advertisement any more that the above are.

Neolights0 (talk) 21:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The whole tone was promotional: "Hutchinson and Lenneville continued with the bold vision to offer signed first edition books" and the like. Also, even if that is fixed, the article did not cite independent sources (see WP:V) to show that the website is notable per our standards, see WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd Like to do some editing on the tone, to make it less promotion if that is possible. This is my first real article, i've made minor edits previously.

Also, Alan Jacobson is a US Best Seller who openly states on his website that VJ is the source for his autographed hardcover books, and they are the only source to my knowledge.

I can also work to find additional sources. Neolights0 (talk) 21:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If Mr. Jacobson is doing business with VJ Books, he's not an *independent* source. Please take a look at WP:V and WP:RS. In the meantime, I've moved the deleted article to your userspace at User:Neolights0/VJ Books. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism to Cavan

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I realise that it was a block evading sock, but you have failed to realise that 86.43.84.66 is adding vandalism to pages--151.224.47.87 (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NW, I blocked this IP as it appears to be just another iteration of the IP you blocked earlier. I also went through the latest IP's edits and dealt with them as I felt was appropriate. The IP had a partially valid point about Cavan, so I restored the article to what I believe to be the correct version (ClueBot's last revert). Anyway, because you're obviously more familiar with all this than I am, feel free to take any action on the articles or with respect to the IP itself that you wish, including reverting any of my actions. Regards.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to recreate Motive Interactive

Hello, I am aware of the fact that Motive Interactive has been deleted several times over the years. I am attempting to recreate it again with your permission. You can find it in the AFC space here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MotiveInteractive I strongly believe that this version is appropriate and compliant with Wikipedia rules. Would you mind reviewing it and creating this article at last. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elbuqui06 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that the Stevie Awards (given that you have to pay to be considered for them) or the Deloitte Fastest 500 count as items that would make this company notable per WP:CORP. There is enough there to avoid speedy deletion, but maybe not enough to avoid a deletion discussion at WP:AFD. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki,

Thanks for taking the time to answer with details. As I am not familiar with WP jargon, should I interpret your suggestion as that there is some progress compare to previous versions? If this is the case, I would very much appreciate that you consider recreating this page and let see what happened. I am really optimistic about this because I have seen scores of companies in the same niche but with lesser status, live on Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elbuqui06 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TP

Any chance of restoring this protection (expired on the 10th) for a day or two? Got an IP- 'fucking cretin', etc. Many thanks _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, appreciate it. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 21:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PickUpCat

I found the article about PickUpCat because I was searching for information about a fraud criminal case involving that company after having come accross new coverage spanning many years but none giving a complete picture of the case. That proves it has some interest. The article I found was like an advertisement for the company. I decided to edit the article, and started by editing the style so it did should not be an advertisement. While I was doing that, you deleted the article. I resumed my work, and recreated the article, adding facts about the fraud and the criminal case, and references to reliable third-party sources. It seems you deleted it again. I think that with the new info and sources added it should not be hastily deleted like that: it should be discussed. There is more to add to this case in fact. Perhaps should the article be called "The Norwegian PickUpCat Fraud Scandal" instead of just PickUpCat but it should not be deleted.--Nefer1010 (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection, you're right. I've restored the article. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 23:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monday Records

Hi Nawlin. Please can you undo the delete of the page for Monday records, or advise me what I need to do to get this approved. Pikachunes (featured on wikipedia), is a serious upcoming NZ electronic music artist. Many external sources confirm Pikachunes as a notably significant act (which is why he is on Wikipedia I suppose). Monday records have recently signed Pikachunes, so I think that makes Monday Records notable by association. Regardless of the Pikachines connection, I also think that an independent record label signing exciting new acts such as this is very notable. I believe (as with most music artist enteries) it is entirley appropriate to include a wiki page on this up coming independent record label, as they sign more and more culturally significant acts such as Pikachunes. Wikipedia is a common source of reference for the music industry, and it is very common place for relevant record labels to be featured along with artists. As well as links to the Monday Records site, I also linked to 3rd party music news blogs who announced the new signing, as they also felt it newsworthy and culturally significant. Please can you restore the article, or let me know what more I can do. Thank you for your time. All the best. Stan.charles84 (talk) 00:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The notability of Pikachunes doesn't confer notability on his label or other companies he does business with, see WP:NOTINHERITED. You need to find reliable, independent sources that establish Monday's notability per WP:CORP. Note that blogs aren't considered reliable sources, see WP:RS. Also, see WP:UPANDCOMING. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1800BobSaget

Hi NawlinWiki Can you please undo the edit you just made on the Paper Magazine page by deleting the photo I uploaded. The changed the photo because it is the most iconic cover that Paper Magazine has ever had. The Kim Kardashian "Break the Internet" cover marks a change in Paper Magazine's content when people really started to pay attention to them and they were able to make a name for themselves. It is very well-known and anyone researching Paper Mag would recognise it immediately. The photo that is there right now is kind of irrelevant. I would really appreciate it if you could not change the photo again if I put the photo of Kim Kardashian up. 1800BobSaget (talk) 18:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)1800BobSaget[reply]

The image you uploaded to Commons is tagged as a copyright violation. The 2010 cover image is much smaller and therefore eligible for fair use (see the description on the 2010 cover's Commons page). NawlinWiki (talk) 18:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @1800BobSaget and NawlinWiki: I have taken the liberty of reducing the size and uploading it here as a non-free image. See File:Paper (magazine) Winter 2014 cover.jpg. —C.Fred (talk) 18:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, I am new and have a great desire to contribute to this great platform, I believe that you are a big veteran here, can you please help me by sending important links like important gadgets and others, Thanks. I know the wiki policies upto a point. Thanks in advance and of course for helping me redirect on Seventieth_aniversary_of_the_United_Nations.Cure.provider (talk) 18:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Try Wikipedia:Tutorial first. Welcome! NawlinWiki (talk) 18:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NawlinWiki, mabay the problem in my language expression, I didn't mean exactly what I said. I am not a scientist to create I ideas and laws. the quantum fluctuations is known in the physics. I collected some Ideas from different references. put them in new order, more explanation.

what is the problem lets to delete it. Malik Matwi --Malik Matwi 18:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malik Matwi (talk • contribs)

Dear NawlinWiki, mabay the problem in my language expression, I didn't mean exactly what I said. I am not a scientist to create I ideas and laws. the quantum fluctuations is known in the physics. I collected some Ideas from different references. put them in new order, more explanation.

what is the problem lets to delete it. Malik Matwi --Malik Matwi 18:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malik Matwi (talk • contribs)

Dear NawlinWiki, can I make the article i made satisfies your conditions, an rewrite it in this wikipedia.

Malik Matwi --Malik Matwi 18:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malik Matwi (talk • contribs)

You said, "I collected some Ideas from different references. put them in new order, more explanation." This is what we call synthesis, which is part of the original research which we don't post here on Wikipedia. So thanks for your efforts, but please post your work on your own website. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brotherly Love TV Show 2015

I would like to recreate this show's article. I understand what you posted on the the talk page. But this is a online show, a web-series, so some information and awards won't be found. Also, there is reliable evidence on YouTube (YouTube/moviecubeinc) of the show, as well as IDMb.com. I did not put references, but I have many certifiably sources I will add.

Thank you for the warning and advice for the page, I will correct these problems.

Youtube and IMDB are not what we consider reliable independent sources, because they can be created/edited by anyone, including the creator of the web show in question. Please look at WP:RS for guidance on what we consider to be reliable sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CouponDunia

The reason for deletion of coupondunia's page seems to be "no credible sources". Theres a link for a linkedin power profile of the founder, and plenty of other mentions of it on the web. Could you maybe give an idea of what else you're expecting? The version you deleted didnt seem to be deserving of a deletion.

Sginnit (talk) 21:31, 28 September 2015 (UTC)sginnit[reply]

LinkedIn isn't an independent source, see WP:RS. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a look at WP:RS. Please do have a look at the linkedin link in the deleted wiki. It wasnt a user profile link. It's a list of influencers in the e-commerce space that is curated by the linkedin team. Do you not consider this an independent source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sginnit (talk • contribs) 21:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an article, it's just a group of pictures of people whom someone at LinkedIn consider "powerful". And it's not a list of companies (like CouponDunia), it's a list of people. I still don't see that you've shown that CD is notable per our standards, WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forrest Galante

A new user with lack of editing experience created the page. An Ip is tagging it for speedy delete. Do something.--Aamir Humshakal (talk) 02:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I asked to save that page as per these sources:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-3200816/Now-S-wild-wedding-Couple-tie-knot-paradise-island-sharks-stingrays-swimsuit-reception.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/travel/video-1152476/FEARLESS-Forrest-Galante-captures-banded-sea-krait.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3002761/Are-sure-eats-plankton-Marine-biologist-hitches-ride-world-s-largest-shark.html

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6164563/

http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/naked-and-afraid/bios/forrest-galante/

The Ip tagged it for speedy deletion and you deleted it?

The sources were provided by the page creator. The page required maintenance and formatting tags not getting deleted--Aamir Humshakal (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, NawlinWiki, I requested deletion based on the blatantly promotional content, at least some of which closely paraphrased the subject's website. Spam, not notability, was the concern specific to the speedy request; in ten years I've never received quite this message for applying a valid template [5]. Thanks, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With so much experience, he was accusing me of creating that page. I removed the deletion tag, but that warning "Page you have created" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aamir_Humshakal&diff=683248997&oldid=683177429 , when the page was created by someone else. Aamir Humshakal (talk) 03:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is correct that the article was deleted as promotional. It was filled with puffy language like "his daring animal exploits and incredible adventure excursions", and referred to him by his first name throughout. Please see WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:51, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

216.126.81.66

You're right: Peel District School Board in Mississauga Ontario. HalfShadow 18:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amelia Records

Hi, why was Amelia Records wiki page deleted. It is not a 'garageband' or a 'startup' nor was the page a page of self interest. It was a factual page that didn't advertise anything. 86.179.26.45 (talk) 19:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page did not indicate how this company was notable per our standards, see WP:MUSIC and WP:CORP, and did not cite any independent sources, see WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article help verifiability? - http://thethinair.net/2015/09/album-premiere-best-boy-grip-best-boy-grip/

That's an article about Best Boy Grip, that merely mentions his label. Even if BBG was notable, which I'm not sure of, notability doesn't transfer, see WP:NOTINHERITED. You need a source that discusses Amelia itself and demonstrates *Amelia's* notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've been watching pages for Young Mayor's - who are an integrated part of local British politics.

I believe that the pages that were created were of people of notability as they are well known in the BYC, British Youth Council and beyond in their areas and communities. Can you help as this is frustrating! Ty

Kiralewis (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC) (is this what you wanted aha)[reply]

This is similar to our policies for youth athletes and leaders of high school and college-level organizations -- they're not viewed as notable here by virtue of holding those offices, or for having local news stories written about their holding those offices. See generally WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evlekis?

Hi NW, I just blocked D3L1VER 4ND 5TAND (talk · contribs · count) and Basil Bazzle (talk · contribs · count) for socking. They are a a technical match for Evlekis. What do you think?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it fits. His latest shtick seems to be copying webpages from small companies, and then arguing when they are tagged for deletion. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lemi Clothing ltd speedy deletion

HI NawlinWiki,

I followed the same structure as King Apparel and JD sports when creating my article on Lemi Clothing ltd. Can you please detail what exactly was wrong with my article and what I need to do have my article accepted on Wikipedia?

R.zimi (talk) 22:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)r.zimiR.zimi (talk) 22:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article did not cite any reliable independent sources (see WP:V) to show that this company meets our notability standards, see WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Juhu Beach Project

Hi Nawlin,

I have just noticed that the page The Juhu Beach Project has been deleted. The page was created without any advertisement and was cited with references. Can you please remove the deleting tag, and let me know what should I need to edit to make that page active?

Look forward to hearing from you.

Neha S Gupta (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page was posted by User:Abraham John Architects, describing a proposed project designed by, oddly enough, Abraham John Architects. That's promotion. You work there, I see - https://in.linkedin.com/pub/neha-gupta/a4/870/117. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nawlin,

It is not promotion, it is about creating awareness of public projects that can be undertaken to improve and affect millions of lives. There are projects of similar nature that have been allowed - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyCycle_(proposed_transport_project)

I am willing to reword the article if you can un delete it.

Thank you Neha S Gupta