User talk:NOTICE501

This is NOTICE501's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 20:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NOTICE501! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 20:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: APCN Humanitarian Awards (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:APCN Humanitarian Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:APCN Humanitarian Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha 14:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Draft:APCN Humanitarian Awards, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Obaland Magazine (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Andrew nyr was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources used don't show that this topic is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Please read WP:GNG before your next submission. Best of luck.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Obaland Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Obaland Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Andrew nyrtalkcontribs 19:51, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of longest birthday celebration

Hello NOTICE501,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Alexandermcnabb, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, List of longest birthday celebration for deletion, because it appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important and/or recognized enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enorecords LLC moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Enorecords LLC, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Java Hurricane 07:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jossy Joe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jossy Joe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 05:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jossy Joe (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability has not been demonstrated per WP:MUSICBIO. Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jossy Joe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jossy Joe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enorecords LLC has been accepted

Enorecords LLC, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 03:56, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enorecords LLC

Tagishsimon A newly accepted Enorecords LLC article was nominated for deletion by an identified sockpuppet on Wikipedia, without any concrete reason than a (COI), this is part of Users practicing vandalism on Wikipedia, kindly join the discussion page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Enorecords_LLC) if you wish, thanks. User:NOTICE501 (talk) 00:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aid People Change Nigeria Charity and Orphanage Organisation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aid People Change Nigeria Charity and Orphanage Organisation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aid People Change Nigeria Charity and Orphanage Organisation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 14:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aid People Change Nigeria Charity and Orphanage Organisation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PWD and President. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted and corrected immediately. Thanks, User talk:NOTICE501

Lucky Omosigho moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lucky Omosigho, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone 17:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Obaland Magazine (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Obaland Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Obaland Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 20:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky Omosigho (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent notability or sourcing from Obaland. Winning an award from his own magazine isn't notable either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucky Omosigho and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucky Omosigho, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky Omosigho (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Draft:Obaland Magazine. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

okay now it's just minimal and does not show notability outside of the magazine founded. Needs more external news sources about Lucky himself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucky Omosigho and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucky Omosigho, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:15, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Obaland Magazine (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Obaland Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Obaland Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 05:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enorecords LLC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enorecords LLC, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enorecords LLC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Winning Jah

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Winning Jah - seeking advice re my talk page request — Maile (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Enorecords LLC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peace and Love (EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peace and Love (EP), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace and Love (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request to revert Peace and Love (EP)

The article in question merits revert because it sold over 2 million units(Newspapers) cited, the EP gained rotational airplay in Brazil, Abidjan, Ghana and Gambia, one of her evergreen hit song "Happy Birthday" was remixed featuring Winning Jah, the track also peaked poosition #34 on Itunes ^[1] ^[2] NOTICE501 (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Veronica Rudian

Hello, NOTICE501,

Thank you for creating Veronica Rudian.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The reference for Giovani e dipendenze: prosegue a Imperia 'Alcool responsabile' is blocked from translation, Please supply English translation for this reference

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 04:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

King Wadada

The AfD is still open. It wouldn't seem to be appropriate to remove the tag? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko Kindly help me close AfD, because i found other reliable news sources that were more trustworthy to be used, my reasons of nominating the King Wadada article was the repeated broken links that were poorly used to source the biography, i needed to go search online news, but Kora Award website also is not updated or doesn't exist anymore, not even a backup on archieve, i suggested clean up.NOTICE501 (talk) 12:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Winning Jah (Nigeria King of Reggae), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tidal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky Omosigho (February 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed Paid Editing Warning

Hello NOTICE501. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NOTICE501. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NOTICE501|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Celestina007 (talk) 08:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sock-puppetry Warning

Hello, NOTICE501, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yoyo Ovi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoyo Ovi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoyo Ovi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 09:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Influence Akaba moved to draftspace

All the references you used as proof to substantiate the notability claims are all Problematic. Furthermore, you may or may not be deliberately be adding false information to the article(I honestly can’t tell) in any case, it’s wrong to put untrue statements in an article. Also, avoid the use of personal commentary in articles and lastly, always ensure to disclose WP:COI's. Celestina007 (talk) 09:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 How do you mean my sources are untrue? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPDfNzQXDxw the chart was real and the music video reached a million, what else did i say that is untrue?? please let's look into this properly for God sakeUser talk:NOTICE501 10:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NOTICE501

Thank you for creating Edo Funk.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Quite

I’m afraid a G7 doesn’t work in that manner, it only applies when you are the sole contributor to the article. Thus, I’m going ahead to remove the G7 tag, if you want the article deleted your best route is to vote a delete at the AFD. Celestina007 (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

If I am being honest, I suspect you have engaged in undisclosed paid editing, but that’s irrelevant now(if you are willing to change) However, please do not take this question I’m about to ask you as an accusatory one or that I’m ABF. But sincerely speaking, have you ever had off wiki interactions with Yoyo Ovi? It seems the subject of the article joined the project appropriately 13 days after the article was created by you, and went straight to her article & commenced editing there which would imply she was aware that the article would be created/was created. Last I checked, it took about three months for an article which hadn’t been reviewed to be automatically indexed. So how exactly she knew before hand that the article would be created is what confounds me. Because hypothetically speaking even if she randomly decided to do a google search, the Wikipedia article would definitely not have popped up since it wouldn’t have been indexed at that point in time. so like i said, how she knew the article was created/would be created & how she knew exactly where to go to find her article is something i feel you may be able to shed some light on, Did you have such conversations with her? Celestina007 (talk) 18:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 Sincerely, i haven't meet the singer before, and nothing like paid article in all i wrote. i will appreciate more if you can reach out to the Singers in anyway or their company's website to ask. The only Nigeria news sources, i use in writing articles, are entertainment news from Leadership newspaper, Vanguard, Punch, Jaguda, Obaland Magazine, Linda Ikeji etc. Probably they coincidentally saw it online. I just google Yoyo Ovi now, it popped up. I don't have any contact with her. Today i saw a non registered User name Yoyo Ovi editing an article i created, i reverted the edit, I'm sure someone was about writing it before i did. We haven't anything in common, also i don't have her contact personally, thanks. NOTICE501 (talk) 20:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I should start by saying, there weren’t any mentions of her in the aforementioned sources and whilst you attempt to convince me, it rubs off as obfuscation. I honestly do not believe you are being sincere but at this juncture I can’t act any further than I already have. Celestina007 (talk) 19:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel dissapointed in this conversation. Your mind told you i collected money or UPE, unfortunately that was wrong. I am a God fearing Christian, i don't have any reason or so ever to lie, because you didn't insult me or pointed a gun at me. I never said Yoyo Ovi, the singer had conversation with me outside wiki. Probably her fans edited the article i created, if she knows other editors i can't tell. Why won't you believe all i have said? Prove me wrong, thanks. NOTICE501 (talk) 22:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Influence Akaba (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anasskoko was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Influence Akaba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Influence Akaba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

An@ss_koko^{(speak up)} 04:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoahDavid771 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah!^💬 00:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daddy Rich Iyasere (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Conflict of Interest

What’s your fixation on Draft:Winning Jah? & why do you keep creating non notable articles on musicians and record labels which always end up being deleted via AFD? If you are having trouble understanding notability & how we roughly gauge, why don’t you start with understanding it first. Furthermore, if you are relatively close to any of your articles subject it’s a great idea not to edit them further and moving forward not to even create COI articles at all. Celestina007 (talk) 20:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NO Conflict of Interest

Celestina007 Because i dislike mistakes, i simply notified you as an experienced editor to control the link i saw online. This has nothing to do with fixation or COI. I felt it could help. Do you mean i shouldn't write or add good sources to articles i started? I feel embarassed severally, i felt we are volunteers and our aim is to make Wikipedia a better Platform to researchers. But sincerely, i am afraid from the way you replied to my comment, i haven't written about non notable musicians or record label, i previously wrote about Enorecords LLC, and the label has notable artists with album releases and songs that has charted on digital platforms like Itunes, Deezer and more. I will never be part of Wikipedia touts or paid editors, i am expecting to receive awards from editing wikipedia articles like other veteran editors, that is why i'm trying my best to write more good articles. I'm not in anyway related to any of them, i only write when i have free hours from personal or family affairs like other editors.NOTICE501 (talk) 22:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Iyasere moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richard Iyasere, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EGGIDICAE🥚 17:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enorecords LLC (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enorecords LLC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Enorecords LLC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enorecords LLC (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enorecords LLC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Enorecords LLC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shine Francis Odigie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shine Francis Odigie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shine Francis Odigie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 23:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jossy Joe (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jossy Joe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jossy Joe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: APCN Humanitarian Awards (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:APCN Humanitarian Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:APCN Humanitarian Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winning Jah (June 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

scope_creep^Talk 17:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Obaland Magazine has been accepted

Obaland Magazine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:18, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucky Omosigho

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucky Omosigho, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winning Jah (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads very promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Winning Jah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Winning Jah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 01:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Richard Iyasere has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richard Iyasere. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Iyasere (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads promotionally. You cannot use self-published sources and should not even include them here, per WP:ELNO. I don't see enough for a claim of general notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Iyasere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Iyasere, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 22:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winning Jah (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Remove POV verbage. For instance- You don't need to say that he "won a prestigious award" Just name the award he won. There are several such phrases that need fixing. Focus on what is fact, and remove words that imply judgement or subjective value.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Winning Jah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Winning Jah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winning Jah has been accepted

Winning Jah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Iyasere (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Multiple reliable sources independent of the subject are required to prove notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Iyasere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Iyasere, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:02, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enorecords LLC (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Winning Jah's article has been recently accepted and now it seems possible UPE or COI. Don't resubmit without reviewing WP:GNG as well as music-related notability criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enorecords LLC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Enorecords LLC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:38, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello NOTICE501. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NOTICE501. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NOTICE501|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See #Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere and Draft:Richard Iyasere

Winning Jah (Nigeria King of Reggae), Winning Jah, and Draft:Enorecords LLC (see also AfD discussion). You are already aware that AfD deleted article is a community based decision. So why are you repeatedly creating duplicate draft and those that has been recently deleted via AfD? It appears you are extensively creating articles for Winning Jah and his company as well as his associates. Please do not make further edits until you don't reply to this message.

Look at Austine Igbinosa. It has only one single source. You must disclose paid editing in case you are doing paid editing. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:11, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to August 2021 - I'm not being directly or indirectly paid or compensated for my edits

Hello TheBirdsShedTears.I have read your comments and understood why you have contested my sincere and volontarily contributed articles on en.wikipedia. The nature of my edits shouldn't give anyone the impression of an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, i have complied with Wikipedia's policy of not writing paid or sponsored articles (COI) or (UPE).

Reading your comments were you forcefully asked me to declare paid, when articles weren't paid for by any Brand, celebrity or company' article to be created. This attitude of COI or UPE accuse is becoming too alarming on en.wikipedia by some veteran editors. I personaly, will describe this repeated accuse of COI or UPE scandals as abuse of administrative power on En Wikipedia. That being said, firstly let's take a look at Austine Igbinosa's article that was created by me.You also stated that i only used one single source.

Austine Igbinosa is a popular African footballer, probably you have also heard or meet with him. His article, like others that i created weren't COI or UPE articles. I'm not his relative or fan but i love football as a sport. Over 300 articles about European footballers were also written with one source and accepted on En Wikipedia, why is Austine Igbinosa's brief article now becoming an issue of suspicious paid edit?. An example of footballer's articles similar to that of Austine Igbinosa with same one source link is Tomasz Szewczuk created by master editor like User:Jogurney but wasn't challenged in any way by en.wikipedia administrators. Other one sourced articles are Arkadiusz Bąk, Henryk Apostel, Kazimierz Buda, Arkadiusz Czarnecki, Stefan Machaj and many more.

Secondly, let's look at some duplicate draft article like Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere and Draft:Richard Iyasere. Draft:Richard Iyasere, wasn't created or duplicated deliberately. I was contemplating on what should be the article's title, before i finally concluded writing it as Richard Iyasere. My only challenge was how to delete Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere's article which i forgot to make a request for (Proposed deletion (PROD), i would like to delete it via (Proposed deletion (PROD) . In addition to your notice about COI and UPE pasted in most articles that i started was so embarassing to me , i'm a kind and Wikipedia law abiding upoming editor, who already understands that Wikipedia is not for promotions or private TV house, I don't merit this scandals or threats. I don't know the subjects in person, i am not connected directly or indirectly and this whole articles weren't paid edits.

Thirdly, Winning Jah's and his record label Enorecords LLC article are't paid edits, I also read this deletion Winning Jah (Nigeria King of Reggae), and AfD discussion) now. Enorecords LLc record label owned by Winning Jah is very notable, if popular artists such as Evi Edna Ogholi, Veronica Rudian are singned to the company with album releases with ITUNES chart positions. Kora Award winner King Wadada, Carol Jiani also resulted managed by Enorecords LLC in the passed.^[3] An example of similar article is Faze_(musician), since 2016, as popular as he is, no master editor is willing to edit it, i am interested in editing important celebrities like Winning Jah, Don Jazzy, Faze and others with good reliable articles online, even when i'm not expecting compensation of any kind from them . Winning Jah's platinum albums and Evi Edna Ogholi Albums, like Peace and Love, that i created were also deleted. I wrote them much better with high scores on Itune Charts, sales units from reliable Newspapers yet got deleted, but a professional editor wrote this poorly sourced article [[1]] yet it wasn't contested.

Conclusion

My aim is to receive Wikipedia awards and be known for good article creator on English wikipedia. I've not been directly or indirectly paid or compensated for my edits. Kindly do me a favour by taking those paid notice off. My character on creating and editing wikipedia articles at free time are based on my hate to fail mentality, i normally accept corrections also repeating a class than failing or abandoning school exams. Thanks NOTICE501 (talk) 09:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere

{{Proposed deletion}} NOTICE501 (talk) 06:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Influence Akaba

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Influence Akaba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Influence Akaba

Hello, NOTICE501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Influence Akaba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jossy Joe

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jossy Joe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jossy Joe (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

MUSICBIO is still not demonstrated

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jossy Joe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jossy Joe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 19:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Winning Jah, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Winning Jah, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Winning Jah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winning Jah, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winning Jah (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Iyasere

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Iyasere, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Enorecords LLC

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Enorecords LLC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:APCN Humanitarian Awards

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:APCN Humanitarian Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucky Omosigho

Hello, NOTICE501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucky Omosigho".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Iyasere

Hello, NOTICE501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Iyasere".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:APCN Humanitarian Awards

Hello, NOTICE501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "APCN Humanitarian Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards

Hello, NOTICE501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020 APCN Humanitarian Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daddy Rich Iyasere

Hello, NOTICE501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daddy Rich Iyasere".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jossy Joe

Hello, NOTICE501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jossy Joe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African Dirndl

The article African Dirndl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article describes a recent (2019) adaptation of the traditional Dirndl design, not a distinct design. Information from this page has been included within the Dirndl article > Adaptations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SRamzy (talk) 14:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mfawa Omini Abam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mfawa Omini Abam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 06:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mfawa Omini Abam

Hello, NOTICE501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mfawa Omini Abam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mfawa Omini Abam

Hello, NOTICE501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mfawa Omini Abam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.top-charts.com/songs/reggae/united-arab-emirates/itunes/2020-W39

[2] ttps://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/12/18/enorecords-records-sales-of-over-2-million-copies-of-evi-edna-ogholi-cd-units/

[3] [[2]

[1]

[2]

[3]