Jump to content

User talk:Moondragon21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CS1 error on Dewi 'Pws' Morris

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dewi 'Pws' Morris, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Triangular election in France

[edit]

Hello, Moondragon21,

Thank you for creating Triangular election in France.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Definitely a notable article, but there are lots of areas with not references, and it would help to gather content into focused paragraphs to make it easier to read. thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 15:27, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with surname Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justin Davis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United Kingdom Liberal Democrat MPs (2024–present) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United Kingdom Liberal Democrat MPs (2024–present) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dajasj (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ngouboua attack for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ngouboua attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ngouboua attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julian Chartier has been accepted

[edit]
Julian Chartier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 03:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Party lists has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Party lists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dajasj (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have nominated the above category, which you created, for renaming. You are welcome to comment here. Obi2canibe (talk) 20:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Home Away from Home (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the article needs secondary sources with significant coverage that aren't IMDB. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlexandraAVX (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Home Away from Home (TV series) (September 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from sv:Lars_Beckman to Lars Beckman. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Future elections in Japan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Rachel Adams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one reference on the page and it's a dead link to a bio of her from the government organization she works for. A quick search shows plenty of articles about and by a South African woman named Rachel Adams regarding AI (here, here, and here) but this seems to be a completely different woman who just happens to share a name and nationality.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. benǝʇᴉɯ 04:28, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rachel Adams for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Adams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

benǝʇᴉɯ 04:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2020 establishments in Benin indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Home Away from Home (TV series) (September 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tavantius (talk) 15:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaya Comer-Schwartz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London City Hall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MLAs

[edit]

I know I've told you this before, but just a reminder: when you're creating a new article about a newly-elected MLA from last night, the stub tag {{BritishColumbia-politician-stub}} goes at the very end of the article, after the categories, not up between the references and the MLAs navbox. Bearcat (talk) 13:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dead or alive?

[edit]

Hi there. You should not add |blp=yes and |living=no as you did on Talk:Somerset Davies. These two parameters have the same purpose, so just use one. Thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:59, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Dominica farmers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Agriculture in Dominica indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talerddig collision

[edit]

I've redirected the draft to the article I created. The article has structure, is fully referenced and has no unverifiable claims (e.g. unit numbers - they are correct but not verified in media yet, there is WP:NORUSH to add the info). Have used a reference from the draft to expand the article with. Mjroots (talk) 06:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Brunswick

[edit]

Hello, I've been reverting some of your edits. You've been adding MLAs to the old ridings, not the new ones, and now I see you've been adding the old ridings to the new MLA articles. Please use the NEW ridings. Thanks. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Information icon Hello, Moondragon21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Results of the 2024 United Kingdom general election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 2025 Dutch general election has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29 § 2025 Dutch general election until a consensus is reached. Dajasj (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pokelego999 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Category:Buildings and structures by decade of destruction on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 17:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Moondragon21. Thank you for your work on Lutero Simango. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Per WP:NSUBPOL, politicians from Mozambique, even if elected in state or national level elections, are not presumed to be notable per WP:NPOL.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 09:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lutero Simango moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Lutero Simango. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GrabUp - Talk 15:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bradley Kelly (November 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
C F A 💬 16:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Moondragon21! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 16:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your biographies of women

[edit]

Hi there, Moodragon21, and thank you for covering so many women among your biographies. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might find it useful to join WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve the coverage of women on the English Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for signing up, Moondragon21, and welcome to Wikipedia. You might find it useful to look through the tips in our Ten Simple Rules in connection with women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 06:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

South Devon Alliance moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to South Devon Alliance. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Rambling Rambler (talk) 21:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former pubs in Devon has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Former pubs in Devon has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Integration of immigrants, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]