User talk:Moceroci

Draft:Marjan van Aubel concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marjan van Aubel, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I would like to update Marjan van Aubel's page and include an intro at the top. I cant seem to add the text? Louiserytter (talk) 13:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Louiserytter (talk) 05:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Southern Guild

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Southern Guild, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 06:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily Gernild

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emily Gernild, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nupamjo (talk) 09:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emily Gernild for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Gernild is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Gernild until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is extremely important in order to optimise the representation of female contemporary artists. The entry is aligned with Wikipedia's policies on neutrality, reliable sourcing and biographies of living people and galleries.

Emily Gernild is one of the most important female artists working in Denmark today. Her work is owned by the Crown Princess Mary of Denmark and the Prince of Belgium. Her work has been exhibited internationally and she is part of a new movement of female artists in Denmark. It is extremely important that people know about female artists. There are so many male artists featured on Wikipedia and it would be good to raise awareness around more female artists.

The entry is aligned with Wikipedia's policies on neutrality, reliable sourcing and biographies of living people. Moceroci (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi Moceroci! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Emily Gernild that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kj cheethamthank you for alerting me to this and I'm sorry if I have done anything wrong. I am doing my best to meet the standards for this entry. And have edited according to the valuable feedback from the community. I will make sure to keep your advice in mind for the future when editing an entry. Again, I;m sorry if this has caused any inconvenience.

It looks like the entry for this female artist will be deleted anyway as it's not enough that she is included in two museum collections, have one book published, has been part of museum exhibitions and the entry has 24 references. Please follow the discussion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Emily_Gernild Moceroci (talk) 16:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't worry too much about my comment above, but it's something to keep in mind for the future. I've not reviewed for article for notability so can't really comment on that. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily Gernild

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emily Gernild requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Gernild. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ^Complex/_Rational 20:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the objection and the initial deletion of this article and with the aim to include more female artists on Wikipedia, I have done additional research about the artist so it meets the criteria for a notable person according to Wikipedia standards. I have addressed ALL the reasons listed by the Wikipedia community, and done additional research and rewritten the article to meet the standards so it's NOT deleted.

All information is backed up by articles from credible newspapers, books, YouTube interviews with museum directors and museum websites. The artist work is included in the permanent collections of two museums and the Danish states official art foundation ’Statens Kunstfund’. The artist has had several solo exhibitions and has two exhibition catalogues published. She is included in the publication 'Touched - Danish Art in the New Millennium’ by art critic Maria Kjær Themsen. Gernild’s work has been compared to the female painters Anna Ancher, Christine Swane and Anna Syberg. And a solo exhibition about her work compared with Christine Swane of the Funen Painters was staged in 2019 at Roennebaekshom Museum. She has been part of group exhibitions at renowned museums. Gl. Holtegaard Museum just announced that they will host a solo exhibition on Emily Gernild work in 2023.

I nominate this article to be included on Wikipedia as Emily Gernild is a notable artist. It is of interest to the public to learn more about female artist and connection to other female painters throughout history. I will be able to link her to several other Wikipedia articles. It will therefore not be an orphan. Moceroci (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Gernild

Hello, Moceroci,

Recreating this article in main space will result in the page being deleted according to CSD G4 criteria. A better solution is to create a draft and submit it for approval to Articles for Creation. That is the only way I know to overcome an AFD decision to "Delete" an article. If you wish, I will restore the article and move it to Draft space so you can pursue this avenue. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LizHi Liz, this is a great option. I would be grateful if you could recreate the page as suggested and I will submit it for approval. I have done extensive research on the subject now and updated the text so hoping it's possible to add to Wikipedia. Thank you. Moceroci (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LizHi Liz, I have created the article but unable to find it. Would you be able to check if I have submitted it for review? MANY THANKS. Moceroci (talk) 18:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Moceroci. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a conflict of interest (COI). I am interested in contributing to bringing more women artists and writers to the forefront. Hence my contribution. I am passionate about art. I thought Emily Gernild was a good choice due to her solo exhibition at Gl. Holtegaard Museum which was announced in all the major newspapers along the current reviews of the a group exhibition at a museum. Her work is part of three museum collections, has two exhibition catalogues, had solo exhibitions at museums, she is referenced in a book on the history of danish art - everything is backed up with articles, books and YouTube interviews with museum directors. What is different to the previous article is the solo exhibitions, and how art critics have compared her to the female painters Anna Ancher, Christine Swane and Anna Syberg - and the movement Funen Painters - a solo exhibition about her work compared with Christine Swane of the Funen Painters was staged in 2019 at Roennebaekshom Museum. I have added more objective context, more credible newspaper articles and focused on her overall importance in the danish art canon. Taking on board all the edits from the Wikipedia community a few weeks ago, and spending so much time editing and researching the subject further has made me interested in the article being published. I will be able to link her name to several articles on Wikipedia, so it will not be an orphan. I hope this explanation helps. Moceroci (talk) 05:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Moceroci, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Moceroci (talk) 05:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Gernild (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Gernild and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 09:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jamiebuba

Thank you for reviewing the article on the artist Emily Gernild. I have read what qualifies as a Wikipedia article and understand this. But could you let me know why the below don't qualify? There's significant coverage shown, and by published reliable and secondary sources. I have listed four books, three articles from the biggest newspapers in Denmark. I have in addition added two interviews which I know you don't regard as highly but just wanted to give context. I have really really tried to do my best with the references and backing everything up. I looked at so many other artist profiles, in particular female danish artists and done my best to make the article on Emily Gernild much better. Her work is interesting in terms of nordic art history - the relationship with the funen painers and edward munch as mentioned by several art critics. I have backed this up in the article. I would of course like to work on improving the draft so it lives up to your standards and it can be created. Thank you again for your help and expertise. I'm grateful.

Book on the history of Danish art written by independent art critic. No involvement from the artist.

- Kjær Themsen, Maria (2020). Berørt - om dansk kunst i det nye årtusinde (in Danish). Denmark: Strandberg Publishing. pp. 243, 244, 335. ISBN 9788792949875.

Museum exhibition catalogue with contributions by art critics, curators and museum directors

- Natalia Gutman (2022), Kassandras søstre – fremtidens malere hæver forbandelsen (in Danish). Denmark, Rundetaarn.

- Vibeke Kelding Hansen and Lisbeth Bonde (2019). Upåagtet - Emily Gernild & Christine Swane; Rønnebæksholm Museum. ISBN 9788799992850

- Milena Høgsberg and Grant Klarich Johnson (June 2021). Emily Gernild: Black Lemons. Kerber Verlag. ISBN 978-3-7356-0772-0.

Art editor of the newspaper Politiken and Weekendavisen profiles the artist.

- Hornung, Peter Michael (21 July 2019). "Ung lovende kunstner: »Nettets hurtige billeder er som hurtige forelskelser. Vi har brug for at forelske os. Men vi har også brug for kærlighed«". Politiken. Retrieved 4 September 2022.

- Steffensen, Erik (26 August 2022). "Tilberedelse af et menneske" (PDF). Weekendavisen. Retrieved 4 September 2022.

- Kryger, Mathias (5 September 2021). "Udstilling på Arken er et billede på den forførende kraft, en blomst besidder". Politiken. Retrieved 4 September 2022.

Interviews in printed and online magazines

Fejerskov, Ditlev (24 February 2022). "Interview: Emily Gernild". Dossier magazine. Retrieved 4 September 2022.

Lodberg, Marie (12 July 2021). "Morgenmad med Emily Gernild". Alt for Damerne. Retrieved 4 September 2022. Moceroci (talk) 07:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Emily Gernild has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emily Gernild. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Gernild has been accepted

Emily Gernild, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Southern Guild

Hello, Moceroci. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Southern Guild, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FireflyBot,

I would like to request to have it undeleted and submitted for review.

Thank you Moceroci (talk) 11:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please can you review the submission for approval.

Many thanks,

Louise Moceroci2020 (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Leopold Alf moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Julie Leopold Alf, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Southern Guild

Hello, Moceroci. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Southern Guild".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:17, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I am waiting for Wikipedia to approve the article. I look forward to hearing from you.

Louise Moceroci2020 (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mandatory paid editing disclosure

Hello Moceroci. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Moceroci. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Moceroci|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You stated on your now-blocked second-account talk page User talk:Moceroci2020 that you are not being paid to edit. Would you please explain, then, what your association is with Southern Guild? If you are working with them or collaborating with them, then you have a conflict of interest and you need to declare it. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the way, your draft won't get reviewed unless you submit it for review. I placed a submission template on it. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I have tried to submit it but I'm still blocked. I am logged in as Moceroci. Moceroci (talk) 15:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have visited South Africa, and their gallery which was a mindblowing experience. I have never seen art and design presented in that way. I was so impressed by their representation of artists. I have seen that MANY galleries have Wikipedia entries, mainly in the west, and I was surprised that they didn't have one given their influence globally. I hope this helps? I do not have a conflict of interest. Moceroci (talk) 15:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. You should not be blocked at this account. I lifted the IP address block on your other account although that shouldn't make a difference, but please try again. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I have submitted it for review. 83.94.235.216 (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone made a comment in the draft about reference errors. You need to fix those. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updated and corrected. Moceroci (talk) 20:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Emily Gernild. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a comment on the Talks page. What is the comment referring to specifically? What is the paid content?

I will be able to correct it asap! Everything is backed up by credible newspapers, publications and museum sites. Moceroci (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are legally obligated to disclose your CoI. It does not matter if you thought the sources back up the content. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid to contribute to the article on the female artist Emily Gernild. I'm contributing as a dedicated supporter of Wikipedia's mission and to raise awareness to a female artist. I am sorry if this has caused any issues? Moceroci (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pernille Rosendahl

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pernille Rosendahl, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Julie Leopold Alf

Hello, Moceroci. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julie Leopold Alf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Leopold Alf (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julie Leopold Alf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend a ^💬 00:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tage Andersen

Hello, Moceroci. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tage Andersen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Julie Leopold Alf

Hello, Moceroci. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Julie Leopold Alf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]