Jump to content

User talk:Magitroopa/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Orphaned non-free image File:Monster Jam World Finals 19 Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Monster Jam World Finals 19 Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey there, just wanted to let you know I removed the PROD you placed on Monster Jam World Finals 2 since proposed deletion isn't applicable to redirects. If you still think it should be deleted, you can take it to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. ~ Amory (utc) 18:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:MonsterJam.png

Thanks for uploading File:MonsterJam.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:MonsterJam.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MonsterJam.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Magitroopa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm DMacks. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See also WP:NOTVANDALISM. DMacks (talk) 13:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Information icon Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

hello i noticed that this week you removed my edit for AGT:the champions and i don't know why because as you see this show is on it's 4th week and the past 3 weeks/shows i put the table up before the show (with no one removing it) and during the show someone else fills it in and there was never a complain or not any problems. look i did not put any names or results on it ever because o don't know who is on it or what the results will be. so all im asking is why i had no problem from the past 3 weeks and now this week i cant put this edit in, let me know why please. its just an empty table so when the show starts someone else puts in the name and results. thank you.donaldtrump 23:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC)spanisharabic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spanisharabic (talkcontribs)

Deal or No Deal (U.S. game show)

Please do not categorize my edits as "vandalism" in your edit summary as you did in this edit. A fansite tracking appearances of game show models is not a site that meets WP:V. AldezD (talk) 17:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


The Big Ballot

Hey, I'm still sort of new at this, so not sure if I'm using the talk page correctly, but just wanted to thank ya for figuring out that source was incorrect on a bunch of the Big Ballot results! I matched up the ones from the two articles I sourced with that wiki page, but just came across a new video on Youtube from the show, that directly contradicts both two of the results that were listed on the wiki page that you cited as bogus, so good call sniffing that out, and apologies for not doing better research on that source. My assumption that the entire page was correct because a few of the results matched up with print sources was foolish and wishful. It's so tough to find nuggets from growing up, but that's no excuse for dropping the ball on my research game. Haven't decided if/how to post partial results yet, but am gonna do some more research at the library and try to find some more print articles that have results in the recap first. Thanks again!. Theonewhoisseveral (talk) 16:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Hey there. First of all, thanks for helping out with all the pages. Don't worry with the 'incorrect info', I just saw the Wikia page being referenced and knew it was a site where people come up with whatever they want, but we're all still good. Anyways, onto the main topic: KCAs. I've actually recently started out a KCA Wikia page to attempt to document tons of KCA history, including pictures and videos that I can find. I've been doing quite a lot of digging, even finding the HQ intro videos from some of the mid 2000's shows on Vimeo (Pretty nice to have it in a good quality or at all!) I even managed to use Wayback Machine today and found the full-1 hour show of the 1988 Kids' Choice Awards, so that'll be good to have too (I'll upload it onto the Archive site sometime this week). I actually found a video from The Big Ballot with Madonna in it, I think one of the only videos I've ever found with footage from the actual show itself. As I find more info on each show, I am updating the Wikipedia pages (Such as the 1990 show, found commercials on YouTube telling the nominations but incorrect ones were listed on the Wikipedia page). Hoping to finally clear some of this up and have very accurate pages as more info is found. Finally thing, on my new KCA Wiki, I've created different categories that are titled "KCA XXXX" so I can easily add and find videos & pictures from each show, for example, here is what I've found from The Big Ballot. If that helps you to find info on the shows to help fix the Wikipedia pages, feel free to use it. Thanks again, and hope more progress can be made on this all. (Also, you mentioned a video from Big Ballot that you found on YT, what's the link to that video? Would love to use it too, lol. Sorry for the lengthy response though.) Magitroopa (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

All That episode count

Hey,

Saw your message in the All That (season 11) edit page, If you have the time, I've also have been attempting to figure out the exact episode count number for the series, if you're available to crack the mystery. Discussion is in the List of All That episodes talk page.

Thanks Again.

Water78 (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Etika

Please source that Etika died on the 19th. He was missing for 5 days until being found. How do you know he died on the 19th, but not potentially the 21st? 2607:FCC8:BC02:3900:A0A3:5243:47AB:92EC (talk) 19:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

We still don't know for certain, but he was reported missing on the 19th. Of course, we may not know what day he official died on for a bit, so it's best to use circa ("(often preceding a date) approximately.") to show he died somewhere around then. Magitroopa (talk) 19:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Etika

It's still misleading in a public view of the article. It only says the 19th but without any source of him suiciding on the 19th. Keep it as 19-24 until the date is confirmed. Whatever thing is used is not showing the accurate death date of Desmond. 2607:FCC8:BC02:3900:A0A3:5243:47AB:92EC (talk) 19:54, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Waaaaaaaaaaaay past 3RR

You are now at 17RR over the last three hours alone. It's time to STOP reverting. I'll drop an advisory note on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring page to monitor for further reversions. - SchroCat (talk) 22:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Might want to take a look at WP:3RRNO- "Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language." Magitroopa (talk) 22:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
  • You're up to 20RR in three hours, and many of those edits are not vandalism or page blanking.

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. SchroCat (talk) 22:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

2600:1700:8010:8680:9D28:F6B7:D415:EC5

I need to let you know that users have the right to blank their own user talk pages. Reverting such edits is not exempt from WP:3rr. If she posts inappropriate content, that is another thing, but she is allowed to blank her own talk page. Please refer to WP:OWNTALK. CLCStudent (talk) 20:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Warning

I noticed you removed sources from Paul Tibbitt and Vincent Waller. Since no other source is left, the problem is that they are BLPs and you put them at risk of BLPPROD. In Paul TIbbitt's case, I had to turn an EL into a source. Next time you remove sources as non-RS, check if there are any other sources left. Those two are famous for their role in an juggernaut cartoon franchise, you're expected to find reliable sources of them on the internet. Remember to use the Template:Re if you want to reply. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 18:29, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for adding sources to Vincent Waller. Now if you could do the same to Paul Tibbitt... FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

On SpongeBob...

So, I checked, and the U.S.C.O. Database (searching for: "Spongebob Squarepants") does have a lot of the SpongeBob production codes – it definitely has 100 thru 200, and then seems to have a smattering of 0 thru 100 and 200 thru 250-ish. Note that the two segments are listed as "one episode" there – e.g. "Spongebob Squarepants : 101, "House Fancy" "Krabby Road".", so there's not the splitting into "101A" and "101B" by the U.S.C.O. (Meanwhile, separately The Futon Critic has about 127–250 in its listing for the show.)

Long story short: The U.S.C.O. Database could be used to help "fix" the various SpongeBob "season" articles, by adding the prod. codes, and then reordering into the broadcast order. (As you pointed out, it looks like there is no support for the prod. codes used at The Big Cartoon Database, unless they are getting the prod. codes directly from the show's end-credits – so unless another source or the end-credits can verify these, they should be removed/replaced...) However, I would not even attempt this without, 1) advertising that you are going to attempt it at a lot of places (e.g. the SpongeBob Talk pages, WP:TV, WT:ANIMATION), and 2) have a number of editors aside from yourself as "on board" with the project. Because, without the latter, it'll just be use trying to hold back a flood of IP reversions, and it'll just end up burning you out...

Anyway, hope this helps. --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: Kamp Koral

I am sorry for accidentally adding that un-constructive section to the article on the Kamp Koral article. I won't add any thing againcthat will get reverted or get me blocked/banned from editing on Wikipedia. I was going to test it and I didn't mean to use the main Wikipedia for it. I didn't know that there was a sandbox to test edits at first. Next time I will use the Wikipedia sandbox to test edits.Airbus A350-100BOI (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

A friendly reminder

Edit summary reminder
Hello. I noticed that your edit to Kamp Koral did not include an edit summary. Please remember to use one for every edit, even minor ones. You can enable the wiki software to prompt you for one before making an edit by setting your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks, -~mitch~ (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: Kamp Koral

I am sorry for accidentally adding that un-constructive section to the article on the Kamp Koral article. I won't add any thing againcthat will get reverted or get me blocked/banned from editing on Wikipedia. I was going to test it and I didn't mean to use the main Wikipedia for it. I didn't know that there was a sandbox to test edits at first. Next time I will use the Wikipedia sandbox to test edits. Airbus A350-100BOI (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2019 (UTC) Airbus A350-100BOI (talk) 21:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

The Masked Singer (American TV Series)

Just letting you know you have done a good job, but you are labeling our adaptation of "The Masked Singer" as an "American" TV series, confusing readers as if the show was from North America or South America. It is supposed to be labeled as "U.S." TV Series as it was being brought to the United States. Once again, great job, but just need changing. Sincerely, BrisPull90. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrisPull90 (talkcontribs) 03:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: List of Dora the Explorer episodes

Why are you restoring vandalism? Clearly the other IP editor involved is not acting in good-faith. They blanked 5k with no reasoning, and look at the edit summary for their next edit. "So this it's you are a shit." 2601:644:877F:F6D8:E90E:FF5B:8209:8C42 (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

I am not restoring vandalism, I am restoring the correct version BEFORE the vandalism. Magitroopa (talk) 17:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Oh, I see. I only assumed as due to my thinking the +72 bytes that werr restored was originally added by said third-party IP. Apologies. 2601:644:877F:F6D8:E90E:FF5B:8209:8C42 (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: August 2019

Hi there, I did provide a source for that information. I've been going through that fourm reading the schedules, so that's where I got it from. A user named kanc usually posts Nicktoons schedules on that forum and I saw that some of the last air dates actually happened 1 day later than the previous day. See for yourself here: https://animesuperhero.com/forums/threads/nicktoons-the-channel-news-and-discussion-thread-3.5639082/ (Anthonyg3281 (talk) 00:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC))

@Anthonyg3281: A forums thread/forums post is WP:NOTRS. Magitroopa (talk) 00:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Why?

Is there some reason you’re again removing a link to an article? Gleeanon409 (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

It's already linked earlier in the article here. If you want to link everyone's name every single time they appear throughout the entire article, you'll just have an entire blue page. Magitroopa (talk) 22:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

As per your edit here, I have removed the 'Film' section from this article again – I fully agree with you that the live-action film has nothing to do with the animated series directly. IOW, the film is an "adaptation" of the series – it's not a "continuation" of the series. Mentioning it at the main TV series article is fine, but it should not be included at the LoE article. --IJBall (contribstalk) 03:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

@IJBall: Yeah, I decided to just leave it after it was readded to avoid conflict. I also wasn't still 100% sure on it, (I sadly have yet to see the film myself) as other shows (Jimmy Neutron, SpongeBob, Back at the Barnyard) have their movies listed, but I was thinking along the lines that those were cartoons that had an animated film release- even if this was a "continuation" of the series rather than an adaption, would be a bit weird (at least for me) considering it is a live-action movie of a cartoon series. Closest I could think of that would come close to the same scenario is The Fairly OddParents, but those are TV films, not theatrically released films. Magitroopa (talk) 03:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Regarding this edit, shouldn't our article content be self-consistent with the article's own title? DMacks (talk) 07:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

I've moved the original Draft article (which had precedence over the redirect by a year!) to mainspace, as Deadline Hollywood is still reporting that the show will premiere in October as recently as their August 30 article on Fall premiere dates. The Casagrandes article still needs a lot of work IMO, so I'm giving you a heads up in case you want to work on it. (Note that I've moved the redirect back to Draft:The Casagrandes, in case there's any useful info to be pulled from there...) --IJBall (contribstalk) 02:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

@IJBall: Thanks for the heads-up, I'll definitely be working on it. The original May PR from Nickeldeon is what stated October 2019, and I do see about Deadline saying it's still coming in October. Even if it was delayed (at all), I would assume not by much since the first promo for the show aired between the two new Loud House episodes earlier today, so it should be coming pretty soon. Magitroopa (talk) 02:51, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Excuse Me

Hello, I hope you have a nice day. I just wanted to apologize. It was not my intention to disrupt edits, but the information I added I thought was necessary because from the reviews I read seemed to be positive, along with high ratings. I was not being opinionated, but perhaps I should have added a source. Anyways that's all I wanted to say, I hope you can forgive. Kermit.mr (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

The Masked Singer Source

Here is the source for The Masked Singer.

https://www.etonline.com/the-masked-singer-clues-spoilers-our-best-guesses-at-the-secret-identities-of-season-2s-new-cast

--MikaelaArsenault (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)MikaelaArsenault

That really doesn't help much, as they don't have any pictures/video of the Ladybug, seems they are just basing it off of the leaked image, seems similar to this source, stating, "Costume reveal saved for Emmy night, with many speculating this is Ladybug. But we know nothing more." Magitroopa (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about that then.

--MikaelaArsenault (talk) 18:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)MikaelaArsenault

Please listen

Nickelodeon Productions is a brand name not an actual production company. Nickelodeon animation studios deserves that title. Besides your edit sends people to the Nick in Sunset page. That studio has long been closed down. Ginika1555 (talk) 16:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

New message from Agentdoof

Hello, Magitroopa. You have new messages at Talk:The_Casagrandes#Nickelodeon_Productions.
Message added 20:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Agentdoof (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello

I have seen that many articles are sourced from the NickALive site (which is a reliable source), but you are still deleting the reference in favor of an unverified twitter reference. I would like some explanations. Signed: AlbForLife4 (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Re: Lego Jurassic World

I wasn't aware that TV Passport was considered unreliable. The end date I added was based on the Canadian broadcast. The show was promoted as a 13 episode mini-series and Family Channel has since aired all thirteen episodes. I would've preferred you simply remove the TVPassport references instead of reverting the edit. You took out some additions to the cast list by doing that. Damnedfan1234 (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

KCA 2019

Sorry about that; I saw the IP kind of had some vandal edits, but go figure I accidently revert one that was correct. Nate (chatter) 01:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Re: November 2019 - The Masked Singer (American TV series)

Hello, the show has 2 directors. Alex Rudzinski did season 1, season 2 eps 1-7 and eps 10-13. Brad Duns directed season 2 eps 8 & 9. I feel that is a constructive edit?

@FiveSecDelay: Entirely unsourced and WP:OR when I checked the credits for episode 8 and his name is not listed- and episode 9-13 of season 2 hasn't even aired, so that is 100% unsourced without the credits. Magitroopa (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
@Magitroopa: what credits are you checking? look at the episode online: https://www.fox.com/watch/8944ae91f2f3150ed3cb4478c461e28f/

or a screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/eQjQ6Un

I apologize- I was looking at the main credits at the end of the episode, not the beginning. I have restored Duns' name to the list. We also don't really need to specify what episodes they directed, just listing them as director is fine. However, the directors for episodes 9-13 of season 2 is still WP:OR as they have yet to air. Magitroopa (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Three-revert rule at Cartoon Network

Hi Magitroopa,

thank you very much for your report at WP:AIV. Unless you manage to explain which of the exceptions at WP:3RRNO apply to the situation, you are prohibited from making any further revert on that page for the next 24 hours, or will be blocked without further warning.

Best regards
~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Magitroopa, to me, this tweet from Nick looks like something we can finally use. But we need to be careful how we use it – it can't be "The series will end in early 2020", but instead will need to be something like "In December 2019, Nickelodeon advertised that the final episodes of the series would begin airing in January 2020.[tweet cite]" added to the 'Production' section.

I'd rather you just go ahead and do this, because the IP editors, etc. will never get this right... Thanks. --IJBall (contribstalk) 23:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

The show has ended in 2019, there may be no new episodes. 2601:197:C181:B70:1C8C:9C7B:AB6:AFDF (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

No, the show ended in 2015. The episodes that finally aired in 2019 have no bearing on this... --IJBall (contribstalk) 23:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Final warning regarding WP:3RR

Hi Magitroopa,

thank you very much for your contributions. I was about to add a message like "Hi, please keep WP:3RR in mind at The Masked Singer (American season 3)" here. However, I seem to have already reminded you about this policy a week ago.

The next 3RR violation will lead to a block; I'm probably being overly patient by not doing this right now. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: Alright, what should be done instead? I was nice to the user and gave them a disruptive editing warning, each time going up to a level 4 warning by 1 level. If I immediately go to a level 3 or 4 warning, I'll be in trouble for not giving any prior warnings (like here), and I would probably get another, "You issued no prior warnings" if I go to the edit warring noticeboard after their second or third attempt. With no other users watching the page, seems like I just have to accept it and let the user go against as many policies as they want to. I attempted to let them know of WP:TOOSOON and WP:DE multiple times through warnings on their talk page and even a talk page discussion on why it is currently a redirect, and the only 'response' I ever got was their one edit summary, once again continuing to go against what I've told them/warned them about. (Should also be noted that I requested the page be protected with them continuing, and no response/given protection as of even now.) Magitroopa (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Magitroopa, the thing is, the detailed explanation above is irrelevant, and would lead to the decline of an unblock request. Please do not edit war even if you are right.
For dealing with conflicts, please see WP:Dispute resolution, and if that doesn't help or doesn't seem to be applicable, WP:ANEW. An essay about possible actions can be found at Wikipedia:Responding to a failure to discuss, which – although not a guideline or policy itself – seems to be pretty helpful.
Actually, please make any further edit-warring reports at WP:ANEW instead of WP:AIV, as it ensures that the request is handled by administrators who do not hesitate to block both participants of an edit-war, contrary to my lenient self.
Best regards
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck

The Masked Dancer

Hi, do you mind taking a look at The Masked Dancer (TV series). I blanked and redirected it to the spin-off section of The Masked Singer, but that was reverted so now I've proposed it for deletion with a tag given everything relevant is already in the subsection and I think it's just way too soon. Wondering what your opinion on this situation is. Thanks! Heartfox (talk) 03:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

@Heartfox: There's no AfD discussion to comment on (and I don't want to mess anything up, haha), so I guess I'll just put my reply here...? Anyways, definitely fails WP:TOOSOON, and in regards to the content you've removed, that would definitely be correct. Just because a celebrity from Masked Singer (like Jeong and Scherzinger) appeared as a panelist, or as a guest (like Hough and Mandel), does not automatically mean they will be a panelist or guest panelist on this new show, which would simply be WP:OR. As you've already pointed out, there is barely any info on it other than that it is a spinoff of TMS, DeGeneres is an executive producer, and that it exists. In regards to the TMS S3 thing recently going on, this would need more of a case to stay up, as there is currently no set host/panelists, premiere date, or even a premiere year.
Only thing I'm not sure about is what title the article should use. There is already The Masked Dancer (film), but I don't think any other countries currently have TMD as a series, so I'm not sure if the current redirect (The Masked Dancer (American TV series)) would even be the correct one to use, or if The Masked Dancer (TV series) is actually correct. But either way, most likely not enough info to warrant its own article at this moment. I'd say it's quite similar to the SpongeBob spinoff announced, Kamp Koral, which currently just redirects to SpongeBob SquarePants#Kamp Koral. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamp Koral would also be good to look at in regards to TMD, especially with the info from WP:TVSHOW. Magitroopa (talk) 04:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
TV series is indeed the correct title.
All the content there was accurate by the sourcing, the named panelists was wrong because the source reported it incorrectly, I’ve removed it.
As the Masked Dancer is one of Fox’s most successful shows launched in the last five years, and Ellen a powerhouse herself, this is likely an IAR case to thwart the TOOSOON essay.
Show also meets wp:TVSHOW as it was announced as strait to series at Fox’s press event. Gleeanon409 (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Reference spaces

Hi! I've seen a lot of times after I add a reference you delete the spaces between the last character and the |. I use the cite dropdown tool in the editor and that's the format it puts out. I believe it used to be no spaces, but was changed a couple years ago... I could be wrong though. Is there any reason I should be removing the spaces so you don't have to lol? Thanks. Heartfox (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Partial block

Hi Magitroopa, per my previous explanations, I saw no other option. I have attempted to resolve this using warnings, twice.

Stop icon with clock
You have been partially blocked from editing List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, and without restriction on any other page, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

File:The Masked Singer US S3.jpg

What about that poster, I thought it looked good but “Non-free files are only permitted in articles”? I though that poster looked non-free. Rider0101 (talk), January 18, 2020 3:39 (UTC)

See WP:NFCC#9, linked from this edit. Magitroopa (talk) 03:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

About It’s Pony

I was honestly trying to fix the page for the show because of a MOS:ACCESS issue on the episode list, like there is two 11-minute episodes that air the same day in the same time and I put them together into half-hour episode in the airing order because of that, but you reverted it because you think that it is not constructive.

So that is question, why do think that my edit is unconstructive?

BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 00:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

@BaldiBasicsFan: See how episode pages like List of The Loud House episodes, Lego City Adventures, and The Casagrandes are formatted. They should only be paired up with their 'sister' episode if it's airing on the same date and has the same production code. For example, "Nosy Pony/Beatrice" today. In your edits, you've even changed them to "102A" and "102B", which is WP:OR as Futon Critic lists them as just "102"- A and B aren't specified whatsoever. And as I said before, if they aren't an A and B together, they should be separate, which is why "Unicorn" (103B) and "Plants!" (101A) are separated. We also currently don't know the production codes for "Game Horse" and "Heston's Coat", so until production codes are known and only if they are sister episodes, they should be separated. Magitroopa (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Okay, that is understandable. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 03:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

It's Pony episodes

All the episodes that are on the list have an airdate and verified plot. Why do you think you can remove it and wait till the airing. It is unnecessary and quite annoying. I have provided sources and cut it to one episode but you keep on removing the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spuffy (talkcontribs) 22:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

@Spuffy: The episodes need to air first, we don't go by 'sneak peek' full episodes released on YouTube. I also mentioned about the change from "1" to "20" episodes in the infobox, when there is a note clearly stating, "increment when new episode airs". You seem to also be ignoring WP:COPYVIO, taking plots word-for-word is not allowed and must be summarized in your own words. Magitroopa (talk) 22:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't see how that is necessary. This just makes the article not reliable. Waiting till an episode airs is pointless and I don't see a problem adding stuff to it when it was verified from the providers themself. Spuffy (talk) 23:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

The Masked Singer (Season 3)

In my opinion, I think that the Masked Singer (season 3) article needs to be published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CodyRhodesDiva (talkcontribs) 04:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

@CodyRhodesDiva: There is no rush to get an article up (Wikipedia has no deadline). As I've already stated on your own talk page, there is a draft already in progress at Draft:The Masked Singer (American season 3), feel free to edit there. Magitroopa (talk) 04:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

101 Dalmatian Street Disney+

Since 101 Dalmatian Street is now exclusive for Disney+ in Canada, would it now be a Disney+ original in that country? This is because Canada is one of the countries that produced 101 Dalmatian Street. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 00:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

@BaldiBasicsFan: Hm.... I'm not quite sure what this would be classified, probably best to check what others have to say and look through stuff like MOS:TV. I mainly know stuff that is either a US series or a UK series, but I don't deal with all the streaming services that much, and I have no clue about when it's a Canadian-produced show that premiered in UK first and Canada later... There are definitely much more people here that are versed with everything than I am, lol. Magitroopa (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
@Magitroopa: I know, since it is going to be a hard question to answer, but we would have to find out and see. If 101DS was originally going to be called a Disney+ original in Canada, that would be the case. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

SpongeBob

Here is a little bit of something, since one of the episodes is separate and will confuse some fans for production code (the Season 12 page), should the episode list go by broadcast order instead, like It’s Pony and The Loud House?

@BaldiBasicsFan: It should be in broadcast order, like you said, like pages such as It's Pony and The Loud House. However, we're talking about 12 (13 in the future) seasons, each with its own article. Basically, all the episodes should be in broadcast order, but that would take a lot of work. So for now, I'm just continuing it as-is, with Big Birthday Blowout separated as a special. Magitroopa (talk) 00:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay, since it will take a lot of work, do it as a fun little side project. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Iguana

Damn!! I was wondering that was missed for so long if it was true. My bad. Heartfox (talk) 01:35, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

That's so odd. Even the picture is "the-iguana.jpg". Heartfox (talk) 01:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

@Heartfox: Agh, stop being so quick with your responses! I keep trying to get a message to you and then get more from you. :P Anyways, you're all fine. Not sure why a site like Variety is getting it completely wrong though... (and FYI, FoxFlash has the images, hit the 'captions' button and you can verify all the names there). I think (?) we may be getting the last one revealed tomorrow though. At least everyone complaining about "There's _ days until the premiere and we still don't know all the costumes!!!" will have nothing to complain about soon. Magitroopa (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Deal or No Deal

Knock it off and don't template me. AldezD (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

@AldezD: The problem is, that tweet says nothing about the show being cancelled, believing that tweet to lead to the show's cancellation is completely WP:OR, as you continue to ignore warnings on this. This is pure WP:SYNTHESIS. Should also be pointed out that the account the tweet says to follow states, "Home of #BackintheGame, #CashPad, @dealnodealcnbc, @LenosGarage, @TheProfitCNBC, @AmericanGreedTV & more!" in the bio. Please wait for proper WP:RS on the cancellation, or a year after the last original episode aired (August 7, 2019). Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

The Masked Singer (U.K.) - February 2020

In regards to Masked Singer. The release window (next year) for the show's second series was also stated in the Daily Mirror source and the Weeks section should be bumped up to 8 since the finale has already aired. -Prince Silversaddle (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

@Prince Silversaddle: 8 weeks would actually be incorrect, there are 8 episodes, but only 7 weeks. The first two episodes would be one week together, then bumping each up (episode 6 is week 5, episode 7 is week 6, episode 8 is week 7). In terms for the second series (I'm American... so second 'season' in my terms :P), it seems to be more of a 'it is planned to' rather than a 'it will be returning in 2021'. A lot could change (cancellation, delay, bumped up, etc.), so it would probably be better to wait for an official statement/press release or for the production/filming of the series itself to get closer with more info. Magitroopa (talk) 02:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Thomas and the Magic Railroad locations

Hello.

In response to the message you left about sources, I have a few sources:

  • For filming at the Ballasalla studio for the interior of Shining Time Station, it's from a website that got taken down, and I unfortunately don't remember the URL.
  • For filming at the Flatiron Building in downtown Toronto, it's from this website: https://archive.is/NU4aN. It says "Toronto's downtown, in particular the Wellington Street East (E. of Yonge) was featured in a few scenes"; the Flatiron Building/Gooderham Building - which they end up going into - is in this location.

I hope this will be enough.

EncyloThesaurus (talk) 07:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

@EncyloThesaurus: Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, sources from forums like that or an unverified social media account are WP:NOTRS. IMDb is also not a source to go by (See WP:CITINGIMDB and WP:RS/IMDB). Thanks again though. Magitroopa (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

New message from Whpq

Hello, Magitroopa. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 20:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Whpq (talk) 20:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Jo Frost's Year of Birth Contributory Discussion

Hi Magitroopa, would you like to discuss the issues with my edits on the talk page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jo_Frost#Date_/_year_of_birth Thanks. Dextrose12 (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Magitroopa, did you see my reply to your comments on the talk page? Dextrose12 (talk) 10:42, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Penguins of Madagascar

The Nov. 29 airing was a repeat of the 8:45pm premiere on Friday, Nov. 28, which is confirmed via Nick's press release and sources that reported on the schedule. I think the misunderstanding stems from how the Friday Nov. 28 premiere was attached to a SpongeBob premiere: TV guide listing from Nov. 28 Hammill Ten (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Suggestion

I notice you have to revert IP edits quite frequently on many articles. May I suggest you use WP:RFPP if you think it's necessary? Keep up your great work! Heartfox (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Please see here

Hi, please see the second section of Talk:List of The Masked Singer (American TV series) episodes—I have a proposal. Heartfox (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey

I'm a wiki user like you and I love to edit here...but i don't have much time...so every time i edit here i want to make sure i don't make a mistake. So...i want to ask you something. One of the writers from Kamp Koral posted a photo of a scrapped character from the pilot episode. He also gave a plot of the episode and a release date. Should I add it to the page?

Here is the link: https://kazunderworld.com/the-kamp-koral-monster/ 13ctii2020 (talk) 14:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Sing-Along Special

I am wondering whether the Sing-Along Spectacular episode should be included in the ratings tables in the season article and episode article given Fox has now changed the production code from SP-2016 to MS-300 and it only includes season three performances. What do you think? Heartfox (talk) 03:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Hm, interesting. Hadn't noticed the prod. code change since I was just waiting on "The Mother Of All Final Face Offs" parts 1 & 2 to somehow update, since originally, Sharon's episode was supposed to air before Yvette's (and then for a period of time recently, both of the current pages of those listed Sharon as the guest panelist- still weird that their advertising is referring to this week as ep. #12 and the Super Nine episode was advertised as ep. #10- so part 1 is technically MS-313 and part 2 then is MS-312).
My guess is that the sing-along is now MS-300 as all the songs are, "selected from Season Three"- I'd still think it's considered a special, as it's not a regular episode continuing the eliminations/process of S3. We could also wait and see how they list it on the FOX site. Magitroopa (talk) 04:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Also worth noting that Zap2it lists it the same way as "Super Sneak Peek" from season 2- at the bottom of the episode list with no episode number given. Magitroopa (talk) 05:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

FYI

I just wanted to inform you that I've nominated List of The Masked Singer (American TV series) episodes for featured list. The discussion is here. Heartfox (talk) 23:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Danger Force response

Hi. I got your message yesterday. I looked at the comparisons and I'd like to let you know that I didn't mess with any citation links. The spelling of the director I added was a typo. There was also some additions and corrections for episode two that were reverted as well as both episodes being worked on having to be re-added due to an edit conflict. I just wanted to let you know that. Did I leave anything out? --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:2001:8F8:1D3D:C79:0:0:903D:D301 reported by User:Amaury (Result: ). Thank you. Amaury19:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Please feel free to re-apply anything you thought actually fixed anything, like the tense updates to the Production section, but otherwise, this IP has been disruptive. The summaries, while they perhaps be condensed a little bit, are generally fine and the template was overkill. If they've already received sufficient warnings, the next step would be WP:ANEW. Ping IJBall as well. Amaury19:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to revert at will now, as per WP:BANREVERT. I've confirmed this an LTA sock we've been dealing with since 2016. Amaury20:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

American woman

Songs are by writers. Because the show credits a later performer incorrectly doesn’t make it a correct attribution. Will change constructively to add info that helps explain.184.181.109.140 (talk) 13:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Except for the fact that we go by the performer TMS lists. Hope you know that different versions of songs can exist as well... In this case, it is crediting it as the Kravitz version of the song. Magitroopa (talk) 15:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Yes it could claim "in the style of..." that's fine. I'll just make the edit and we can constructively edit it together.184.181.109.140 (talk) 03:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
We don't need to get specific about if each song is the 100% original artist or not... it's fine as-is. Again, different versions of songs exist. In this case, even if it is the Kravtiz version of the song, the Kravtiz song/version is still by Kravitz. (As stated right in the article for the song, "Kravitz's version is slower and softer than the original, without the signature guitar solo".) Magitroopa (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Yes, different versions exist and you are right the Kravitz version is by Kravitz. So by your logic you are saying he was in the costume that week?184.181.109.140 (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Just FWIW

On diffs like these [1] where you're correcting the reference format, I'd just be a little careful to be calling it out in edit summaries as "Because it's apparently impossible to do it correctly". The original citation the user added is sufficiently complete to satisfy WP:V. Now if we were going for a Good Article, then we'd want to clean it up like adding the link to the website or cleaning out the title cruft, but that's more tidying up, not fixing errors. I'd just fix the citation format without comment, as this may, if you ever got into a dispute in the future, could come back to bite you.

If it were the case of the user just dropping a plain URL for the citation, maybe asking them to fill out a citation template repeatedly would be good, since that requires actual work. --Masem (t) 21:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey there :)

I remember you from the Super Mario Wiki. I'm part of the Super Mario Wiki too. I'm Greenpianta. KrazyKong (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

SpongeBob SquarePants video games

Hi there. I'm sorry for removing content in the SpongeBob SquarePants article without an explanation. It was not vandalism. I recently created an article for SpongeBob SquarePants video games (you can find it here) and I took some of the content found on the video game section of the parent article to fill in the new one. I removed it for redundancy since the same content removed from the parent article will then be found on the new one. If you're active on these pages, pleae feel fre to assist in filling it in. Osh33m (talk) 22:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey there

For the episode list in the broadcast order, I have this website for you:

https://www.nickandmore.com/episode-lists/spongebob-squarepants/

BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 15:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

[2] (there are multiple Twitter-posted stories that copied the original PR with the image)...just put removed the extraneous image stuff in Paint.net and uploaded it over the old one. Nate (chatter) 22:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

The Wiggles Movie

I would like to add some stuff to the "Production" section of The Wiggles Movie.

They say "This section needs expansion with: need production details, director Hilton Fatt (Jeff's brother), budget, filming and locations, special casting".

I would like to add and correct some stuff, but I should have approval before I can do so.

I found filming locations listed in the credits: Mentmore House Studios (which no longer exists, but was used for Frauds and Strictly Ballroom), Oatlands House, and Dame Eadith Walker Hospital (aka Yaralla Estate), with sound recording done at Studios 301 (credited as Max Studios).

They also say the film was shot in 5 weeks, yet IMDb gives out the actual filming dates: November 1996 to March 1997. That's 5 months, not 5 weeks (Although I remember you saying IMDb's not that reliable a source).

I figured I would ask for approval: can I add these?

EncyloThesaurus (talk) 22:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

@EncyloThesaurus: I don't have much knowledge on this topic myself, but if you have source(s) to include that help confirm these, that's great. You can see info regarding using IMDb as a source here and here. There's plenty of information located here too if you need some more help on figuring out if a source is reliable or not, and plenty of links to go further in on there. I'd also suggest to try and see if anyone else would have further/better input on the talk page of the article, and maybe checking out some of the WikiProjects listed at the top to see where else you can get some more input. Hope this helps! Magitroopa (talk) 02:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
@Magitroopa: And what about the end credits in the film being a source? EncyloThesaurus (talk) 09:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Can you please fix the episode list for me. I wanted to be in the actual airing order according to The Futon Critic. Most Nickelodeon shows are always listed by airing order and not production order. SpongeBob SquarePants though breaks this rule. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi

I like your username, it reminds me of a video game. Cliffordtheshark (talk) 20:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Episode title

I'm wondering why you have chosen to omit "The Masked Singer:" from the episode title of the sixteenth episode in the ratings table of the third season article and the episode list. This is the official title given by Fox's press release and is also used by Zap2it. Heartfox (talk) 21:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Dora IP

Hey there, if this IP acts up again, please let me know. I might see it, but if I don't just drop me a line. They've been problematic for a while. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

It’s Pony ONCE AGAIN

Your making me think that I was doing WP:DE, I WASN’T! Your doing an edit war on me because you think this is better:

Episode summaries must be expressed in your own words. Do NOT submit content you find from another web site as it is plagiarism and likely a copyright violation, which Wikipedia cannot accept and will be removed or reverted. Superficially modifying copyrighted content or closely paraphrasing it, even if the source is cited, still constitutes a copyright violation. Summaries should be about 100 to 200 words in length, per WP:TVPLOT, and those substantially less than 100 words are most likely to be scrutinized for possible copyright violation.

I was just fixing the goofs, but you keep on doing WP:DE on me. If the summaries on the first few episodes don’t follow WP:TVPLOT, they should be removed. If you don’t want them to be removed, will have a talk on this. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 22:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

No, you are disruptively editing. The notices are perfectly fine and do not need to be changed, they are like this on plenty of other articles as well. There is no reason to change them. As with this edit, you now seem to be getting into WP:IDONTLIKEIT. You are not 'fixing goofs' whatsoever. The current summaries are fine, we do not need a fully-in-depth plot of what takes place in the episode, that is not suitable for here. Magitroopa (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Okay I'm sorry for what I did but, even if other articles use that don’t put copyright notice, saying it would likely cause as a violation of WP:OTHER. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Lego Jurassic World: Legend of Isla Nublar

Hey, I saw that you reverted my addition of TVNZ's release of the show. While you're correct in stating that Facebook page didn't list when the show launched on their platform, all signs point to that contest being held in promotion of its debut. Unfortunately, TVNZ doesn't seem to include children's content in their programming update blog posts and I can't find any info on when or even if the show ran on linear. However, archived versions of the "What's New" section on TVNZ's website shows no entry for Lego on October 25th, but does show one on November 12th. TVNZ's website doesn't archive well, so you might have to play around with it a bit before it displays what I'm talking about.-Damnedfan1234 (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

@Damnedfan1234: That Facebook source about a contest still remains as WP:OR... we can't just take a Facebook post talking about a contest being held and automatically assume that's when it started airing. Similar sort of issue regarding the recent revival of Deal or No Deal - their official Twitter account put out a tweet stating that the account is no longer active. While it does seem likely that the show has ended with there being no recent news and that tweet from them, taking that tweet and using it as a source that the show has been cancelled is completely original research. I believe this likely falls under WP:SYNTHESIS. We also probably don't need to list every single country that has aired the show, as per MOS:TVINTL- maybe if it were somewhat notable to be airing in those other countries, but even if it were to be included, it does need a proper source for it. Magitroopa (talk) 22:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

New episodes of Ryan's Mystery Playdate

I don't live in the US so I cannot verify on my own whether new episodes have aired of this show, however, the instagram account for the show have uploaded posts with new guests such as a candy maker, an origami artist, a breakdance dancer (same post says this episode is called "Ryan's Flowing Playdate"), a rapper, luchadores, a puppeteer, a Blue Angels pilot, soccer players, a pool player and a derby racer; not to mention Prime video lists the candy maker and origami artist, and breakdancer and rapper episodes. Hope you could check into this -Gouleg (TalkContribs) 13:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

@Gouleg: Yeah, I've been busy with some other stuff, but new episodes have aired. Plenty of new episodes as per Futon Critic (screenshot) and Zap2it. Magitroopa (talk) 16:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Dora the Explorer (Voice Cast)

Hello, Magitroopa. I added some info to the voice cast of the Dora the Explorer because some of the information is incorrect for the following reasons:
1.) Boots was actually voiced by Reghan Mizhari for season 7 (2012-2013) in addition to seasons 5-6 (2008-2012). Meanwhile, Koda Gursoy only voiced him for Season 8.
2.) Backpack was voiced by Alexandria Suarez in Seasons 5-7 (2008-2013) and was replaced by Sofia Lopez for season 8.
3.) Tico had a third voice actor (Oscar Hutarra) starting with season 7 to Dora and Friends: Into the City!
4.) Benny's second voice actor was replaced near the end of season 7 to the end of season 8 and in Dora and Friends: Into the City! by Aidan Gemme.

Here are two links that will back up my claim. The first link is the complete series of Dora the Explorer. Look at the voice credits for seasons 7 and 8 and you will see the voice changes. For the second link, look through the cast names for the voices of Boots, Backpack, Tico and Benny in order to see the voice changes.

1. https://www.thewatchcartoononline.tv/anime/dora-the-explorer 2. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0235917/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast

Reply as soon as you can. Sincerely, NDW023 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NDW023)

@NDW023: Hi there. That first link definitely seems to be unreliable (apart from it having the full episodes of the show, but you still couldn't source directly from that site...) and IMDb can't be used as a source- see for more about that at WP:CITINGIMDB and WP:RS/IMDB. Sorry about the recent reverts, but stuff like this should definitely be sourced, as it otherwise can just be original research.
Just doing a quick search of "Oscar Hutarra dora the explorer tico" on Google, I was able to find the Apple TV listing for "Dora's Super Soccer Showdown", which I believe is a source that can definitely be helpful. However, it only lists Oscar Hutarra as Tico- while he is listed by this source, it doesn't help a lot that he voiced from 2012-2019, that specific source only shows he voiced the character for this particular episode in 2014. (Like I said above, assuming that he voiced from 2012-19 from just one episode in 2014 would be original research).
I also haven't done much work regarding Dora or the voice cast, but the voices already listed there should definitely be sourced too, just like Dora Márquez already is. I'm not 100% sure, but maybe that site with the full episodes can be useful, but without sourcing that 'watchcartoononline' site itself and instead entering episode info into Template:Cite episode- for example, something like "Dora and Diego in the Time of Dinosaurs". Dora the Explorer. Season 8. Episode 9. October 30, 2013. Nickelodeon. (Check how to do that properly by looking at that in the editor for this talk page...) and then using the cast listed for whatever episodes necessary.
Hope this helps! Magitroopa (talk) 03:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Please explain

Could you please explain to me why you reverted this seemingly innocent edit? Debresser (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

@Debresser: Pure WP:DE, just like all their other edits which they've since been blocked for. Most, if not, all their edits go entirely against WP:REDNOT and WP:OVERLINK. In the case of this edit, the REDNOT would be Quinn's House and the OVERLINK is Berlanti Productions, as it is a redirect to Greg Berlanti, which is already linked under the executive producers. Magitroopa (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
I see. Thank you. Debresser (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

NFL on CBS

It said on 2020 NFL season article that select NFL on CBS games will have a Kids Friendly Broadcast on Nickelodeon. Kilebogart0 (talk) 04:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Summary of changes to KCA 2020

Hello, Magitroopa!

Thanks for reaching out to me about not adding a summary to my changes on the 2020 Kids' Choice Awards article. This is one of my first edits to a Wikipedia article I have ever done.

I've edited many articles on other wikis for years, and none of those wikis have any strict rules on providing a summary of your edits. It's just an optional thing that you can do on the other sites.

Once I started getting used to the article editing and code, I decided to make a Wikipedia account, and started to edit just recently.

I may make several small mistakes, and thanks to people like you I can improve Wikipedia articles for the better. BrayYay12 (talk) 03:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

:) BrayYay12 (talk) 03:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey

What do you mean by "reliable". I used as references the full episodes. Whats more reliable then the episodes themselves? If you want, check Nick Israel. XxXvamXxX (talk) 20:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@XxXvamXxX: It means what it means- you need a reliable source for the titles and airdates, recordings fail WP:V. A recording of an episode like this is entirely WP:NOTRS. You would need a source like The Futon Critic or Zap2it to support the title and/or airdate. Plus, even just checking one of the episode links you included, the titlecard of the episodes are not shown, nor is there anything showing that it aired on July 1, which would make assuming these dates without a reliable source original research, which isn't allowed. WP:SYNTH also applies. Magitroopa (talk) 21:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello. After some digging, found sources from the official Nick website. Can I add them again? XxXvamXxX (talk) 21:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Spongebob Season 12 wiki episodes

I just wanted to ask for the spongebob season 12 episodes wiki how to cite sources properly. I think I'm following it correctly but I always get a message sent back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.87.171.184 (talk) 00:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

That's because the first edit you did, you didn't include any sources, and the past two edits you've done, the sources are WP:NOTRS. Take a look through the different things regarding reliable sources here. If you're trying to use sources from sites such as Twitter or YouTube, they should be from verified accounts like this or this. A video from some random YouTube account or an unverified Twitter account should not be used. There's already been a discussion regarding Waller's Twitter being used as a source here.
We can just go by sites like Futon Critic and Zap2it. We can wait for these verified sources to list the episodes and their airdates. Magitroopa (talk) 00:35, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

My thing is that these episodes have aired in other countries, so they are real. It is already confirmed on the spongebob wikia so I believe this shouldn't be different, but it's just my opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benroks2020 (talkcontribs) 02:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your contributions towards All That (season 11) and keeping it in good shape. ShadowCyclone talk 02:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


Changes to sources

  • Secondary sources are preferred over primary sources (i.e. press releases).
  • The lead does not always require citations if the associated statement is already cited in the body of the article. (WP:LEADCITE).

ViperSnake151  Talk  15:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Supernanny USA

Hi just wanted to let you know what I put on the Wikipedia page about it airing in the UK I know it isn't sourced but I've seen in on the schedule on E4 for Monday at 9pm. Adavid299 (talk) 20:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

The episode list needs a clean-up, due to it having all of the episodes separately, when in reality, the episodes by production order are combined together. Streaming services like Netflix are not relatable sources.

It is violating WP:CRYSTAL, and as a result the list needs to go by the list of a modern Nickelodeon cartoon, not a modern Cartoon Network show. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 22:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You didn't get a response to this question, and I wouldn't know how to answer. I just now saw it in the archives.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Cowell Injury - Stories emerging, proving absence from 1st Live Round

I checked up on that story that an IP put out. Now while there isn't much information going around about whether there is to be a stand-in or if it will be a 3-judge panel for the episode, it is very clear he will not be attending the episode. Both this and this confirm what the IP was trying to state. GUtt01 (talk) 22:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

@GUtt01: Hm... either they updated the article since I saw it or I just (somehow) entirely missed it, but I do see the, "Cowell will not be filming AGT's first live show on Tuesday" now. The, "NBC said Cowell will not appear..." definitely supports that and should definitely be used as well. And yes- we definitely shouldn't have any speculation about whether it will be a 3-judge panel or have a guest/stand-in- that can be updated as it's announced. (This Deadline source should definitely be used as well regarding Simon...) Magitroopa (talk) 22:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
While not anything to put into the article, feel like mentioning that it seems like we have our first look at this year's live show set via Klum's/Vergara's social media. Magitroopa (talk) 23:12, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
@GUtt01: No clue what you were thinking, but I think no matter what is done (stand/fill-in/guest or just the 3 judges), Simon's column can probably remain... See here where scenario 1 can be for if it remains just the 3 judges, with scenario 2 being if there is someone else filling in. (Stern's name in scenario 2 is just to give an example... nothing announced about anyone filling in as of yet.) And the sources regarding Simon's accident can be included at the end of the note provided. Magitroopa (talk) 23:41, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Series are all connected, not separate

Secret Exhibit is literally a prequel to Legend of Isla Nublar. The pages for both shows directly state this — Preceding unsigned comment added by JurassicAce (talkcontribs) 05:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

I'm new to this and believe that I have submitted a page for Double Trouble. However, I hadn't yet created a page for the LEGO Jurassic World: TV Series. So if you could help create those pages, that would be nice seeing as I am new here and don't know much about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JurassicAce (talkcontribs) 05:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
@JurassicAce: All of these are separate specials/series. They don't really fall under one whole 'series', but separate LEGO Jurassic World series. Yes, they do have a chronology (So yes, I understand the changing of 'related' to 'followed'/'preceded' by...), but these would still remain separate series- Legend of Isla Nublar, The Secret Exhibit, and Double Trouble can all be in the same chronology, but they would still remain separate series and not under one series titled LEGO Jurassic World or anything like that.
And as an FYI, the Double Trouble episode are currently listed at Lego Jurassic World: Legend of Isla Nublar#Specials. There currently seems to be no articles/sources regarding it besides a trailer on the Peacock Kids YouTube channel- so there's really not a lot of information on it to warrant a new article on it unless there are more sources for it- which is why it is currently listed on the Legend of Isla Nublar article as of right now. Magitroopa (talk) 05:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
And actually, thinking more about it... I think what you are more-so trying to look for would be a Lego Jurassic World franchise rather than a series (See a list of a bunch of different specials/series/franchises here). So basically, I would think you're looking for something like this article...? Magitroopa (talk) 05:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
@Magitroopa: It's a series. The Secret Exhibit, Legend of Isla Nublar and Lego Jurassic World: Double Trouble are all connected stories that are all a part of the same series. The term franchise would incorporate the other LEGO Jurassic World short film Indominus Escape, which is clearly not connected to the TV Series
And Double Trouble is a standalone special that follows the events of Legend of Isla Nublar. Therefore, like with The Secret Exhibit, it should have its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JurassicAce (talkcontribs) 06:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
@JurassicAce: I'll try and see more about the 'franchise' vs. 'series' for this- I'd definitely think if an article is created though, It'd be fine to go with a franchise article, include Indominus Escape, and then have the other series together noting that they fall under the same timeline/storyline. As for Double Trouble getting it's own article- there would need to be more sources for this- and I can only find one thing about it, which is why at the moment, it is fine on the Isla Nublar article like it currently is (but that does not mean it can never be a separate article- it certainly can be if there is more information/sources/coverage for it- one YouTube video is not really enough at all for its own article). Magitroopa (talk) 06:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
@Magitroopa: Thinking about it some more, I think if you made a page for the LEGO Jurassic World franchise and then had a subsection for the LEGO Jurassic World: TV Series where The Secret Exhibit, Legend of Isla Nublar and Double Trouble were all displayed as part of that series, that would work. Then you could have a link on the pages for Secret Exhibit, Legend of Isla Nublar and Double Trouble that would lead to the LEGO Jurassic World: TV Series section of the franchise page.
Legend of Isla Nublar was a 13 episode mini series. It's already clear by Double Trouble being a special that it is not an episode of Legend of Isla Nublar and therefore should have its own page. Now, yes, if you make that page right now, you probably won't have a lot of information on it. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't already have it's own separate page.
@JurassicAce: First, I know you're new- just wanting to say I am by no means trying to be mean to you or reject any ideas, but just trying to help you understand things here. For Double Trouble getting its own article- like I said before, it is perfectly fine where it currently is at Lego Jurassic World: Legend of Isla Nublar#Specials until there is more coverage on it. There is no rush to create an article for it ASAP, especially when there's very little information on it. As an example, that's why Rugrats (2021 TV series) currently redirects to Rugrats#Revival. It can certainly be its own article in the future, but for now, there is not much information on it which is why it is currently on the main Rugrats article. You are entirely welcome to edit the draft for Double Trouble in the time being, and you are able to work on it/add more information on it there at Draft:Lego Jurassic World: Double Trouble until there is more information and sources on it to move it to mainspace/as a visible article. Magitroopa (talk) 06:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Sponge on the Run poster

I am trying to upload the poster that says it's coming to theatres on August 14, 2020. This is the only poster I can find that says so. It may be a US-movie, but it's still a movie showing in theatres. -- Cody Fearless-Lee (talk) - 12:17AM - August 14, 2020 —Preceding undated comment added 04:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello

I am sorry if I broke some rules or something but I have seen the movie SpongeBob: Sponge On the Run and those actors and characters match up and I felt it was necessary to add it. Tyler Michael Mannix (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

@Tyler Michael Mannix: You removed multiple sources (even one that was a ref name, breaking it in other places the source was used on the page) and added original research. Even if you've seen the movie, the information still needs a reliable source. Magitroopa (talk) 05:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. Tyler Michael Mannix (talk) 23:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Nick reruns

That makes no sense, how come the Cartoon Network and Disney Channel pages allow shows that are rerunning on the channel to the current programming but not Nickelodeon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthur&JohnnyDude69 (talkcontribs) 02:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Entirely WP:OSE. Just because it's done on other articles, does not automatically mean it must be done everywhere- especially if it's wrong. Magitroopa (talk) 03:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Sponge on the Run

Just in case, have you seen the film? Or do you want to start an edit war just because of a tantrum of yours? ErnestoCabral2018 (talk) 06:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

@ErnestoCabral2018: No, you are currently the one beginning an edit war. I've told you multiple times to read the talk page discussion about the cast/credits and left you multiple warnings that you aren't willing to acknowledge/follow. Magitroopa (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The info on IMDB is veridical to you or not? ErnestoCabral2018 (talk) 07:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@ErnestoCabral2018: IMDb cannot be used as a source, per WP:RS/IMDb and WP:Citing IMDb. Magitroopa (talk) 07:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

I don't appreciate you undoing my edit from that page. It is no joke. The Loud House Wiki DID in fact revealed that Nickelodeon confirmed the Casagrande children's ages. DO NOT undo edits that are necessary/true. Whatever you say, I not going to agree with because of what you did.162.226.101.193 (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Messaging

I didn't do it. Eric Sharkey 20:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharkman720 (talkcontribs)