User talk:AlbForLife4

Yabba Dabba Dinosaurs! moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yabba Dabba Dinosaurs!, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:54, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The first episode of the cartoon was released in 2018 by a mistake...so this show need a page...why other's future shows have a page, and this no? AlbForLife4 (talk) 09:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When it was released is irrelevant. Merely being released a year ago doesn't guarantee a page. Articles are expected to meet certain standards and your draft does not. There was previously a draft for this article but nobody nobody seemed interested in upgrading it and it was eventually deleted as abandoned. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kamp Koral, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 01:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Garfield Originals. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (✉) 22:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kamp Koral‎, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 15:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added 7 references on the page and you tell me that none is good? AlbForLife4 (talk) 15:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kamp Koral was recently the subject of a deletion discussion which you can see here. The outcome of that discussion was consensus to merge the content of the article to SpongeBob SquarePants. It doesn't matter how many references that you have, Kamp Koral has to remain redirected as a result of the deletion discussion. A single editor can't overrule the outcome of a discussion by 7 participants, especially when the discussion closed only 2 days ago. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would also like to point out that of those, "7 references,"- some were unverified Twitter accounts (which is being discussed), as well as a chatlog of a fan-run Wiki, which is 100% WP:NOTRS. Magitroopa (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguated links

Just to let you know, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at NickCentral (website), please use:

[[Viacom (2005–present)|Viacom]]

Thank you for your edits and your support in this! Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 22:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for telling... AlbForLife4 (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NickCentral (website) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NickCentral (website), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have moved this draft back to mainspace, which is inappropriate. When articles are moved to draftspace, they should not be moved back to mainspace until the identified problems have been corrected. In this case that most certainly did not happen. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, AlbForLife4. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page NickCentral (company), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Your knowledge of specifics about a non-public Nickelodeon website would suggest that you have an affiliation with Nickelodeon, Viacom, or MTV. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Hey Arnold! episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arnold and Harold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Garfield Originals. AussieLegend (✉) 17:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the one who added information without references...on the page writes that the first episode premiered on September 2, 2019, which is completely false and devoid of references. AlbForLife4 (talk) 20:19, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one who removed the comment tags and made the unsourced dates visible,[1] effectively adding unsourced conrtent to the article. --AussieLegend (✉) 00:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Casagrandes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury • 17:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Casagrandes, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 17:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop restoring content that other editors have removed. You have done this several times now. One such example is at Garfield Originals. On 24 Ausgust 2019 I removed an unsourced claim that, as well as being personal commentary is unverifiable.[2] A short time ago you restored this claim.[3] I removed it again, explaining why yet tyou again restored it, deceptively claiming that you "added more info", when in reality you were reverting what my edit. This is at best disruptive but is also edit-warring, either of which could result in a block if you persist. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Casagrandes; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 15:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tring Tring, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Albanian and Ibi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello AlbForLife4, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Garfield Originals have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 13:04, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is now the third time that I have had to remove the plot section from the article. You've added it previously and it was removed then as a copyright violation! --AussieLegend (✉) 13:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from ARO 10 to Dacia Duster (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Play VoD moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nickelodeon Play VoD, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nickelodeon KEY

Hello, AlbForLife4,

Thank you for creating Nickelodeon KEY.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:42, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Play VoD moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nickelodeon Play VoD, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 13:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Discospinster: I've nominated the draft for speedy deletion as a copyright violation of this website. According to the logs for the draft it was deleted by Jimfbleak for this reason less than 21 hours before it was recreated by AlbForLife4. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon KEY moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nickelodeon KEY, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 13:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nickelodeon Play VoD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nickelodeon Play VoD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://nickalive.blogspot.com/2018/09/viacom-launches-nickelodeon-play-app-in.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AussieLegend (✉) 13:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon KEY moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nickelodeon KEY, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above move was made because you inappropriately moved a draft article to article space. The draft was clearly undersourced and should never have been moved by you. Please do not do this again. If you think that a draft article is ready to be moved to article space, and that requires a lot more content that is present in this one, especially when it comes to references, submit it for review and let a more experienced editor review it. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 14:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Translating

Hallo, the article you started on Pepco (store) appears to be a translation of the Polish wikipedia article, but you have not said so. Please read WP:HOWTRANS and follow the rules there about giving credit to the original writers of the article. Thanks. PamD 21:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Pepco logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pepco logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pepco (store)

The article Pepco (store) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ABCom

Hello AlbForLife4, Please see: WP:C-P on this. Thank you. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 17:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lost Media Wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lost Media Wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SD0001 (talk) 16:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comedy Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comedy Central Family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]