User talk:CodyRhodesDiva

Welcome

Hello, CodyRhodesDiva, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! !dea4u 06:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Do Not Add Unsourced and Exaggerated Contents

The History of WWE article is a summary of key events within the industry. information should be kept short and on topic, and also proper sources and citation should be added. your recent edit seems to have been based on personal analysis and thus has been reverted. Do not exaggerate contents and please provide sources. if you do not know how to, you are welcome to ask so at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Plase comply with the rules, thank you. Dilbaggg (talk) 18:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Preakness Stakes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 Preakness Stakes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to American Music Awards of 2013 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 08:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Masked Singer (American season 3), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please keep in mind there is already a draft in progress for this. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 04:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop posting unsourced trivial information as you did in Royal Rumble (2017). You have a history of doing so. If you do it again, this time you will be reported and may be blocked. Dilbaggg (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

I created a Wikipedia page: [[1]]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that your recent contribution to the page Template:Wintersport season 2019–20 has been reverted, as inadvertently you broke the dates, formats and links. You were pointing to the next winter sports season (2020-21), whose pages have not yet been created.

May 2020

I created a Wikipedia page: [[2]]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello CodyRhodesDiva, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to University of Kentucky cheerleading scandal have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

Thanks, I didn't know about the copyright rules.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The4lines (talk • contribs) 03:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of University of Kentucky cheerleading scandal

The article University of Kentucky cheerleading scandal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 05:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Created The New Era (WWE) article

What do you think of my article?

We appreciate the effort and thank you for your contribution. You did add some unsourced contents and misquote some sources, for example stating that "women were performing critically acclaimed matches on NXT", note that while many matches receive a positive response, that does not mean they are all critically acclaimed which are 1 in 1000 like HBK vs Taker WM 25, Charlotte vs Lynch vs Banks WM 32. Critically acclaim equates to being "match of the year worthy", and random 20 minutes good matches do not meet the criteria, for example, Orton vs HHH at SuperShodown 2019 was a good match, that doesn't mean it was critically acclaimed, only the rarest of the rarest matches fit that definition. Also try to state what the source states and remember the strict no original research and no personal opinion policy, read this very carefully: WP:NOR. Other than that thank you for the excellent article, a lot of editors have contributed to it since the page was created and we hope you keep making contributions to your excellent article. Cheers. Dilbaggg (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Just a simple note. Please keep in mind WP:Trivial as with your recent edit to Royal Rumble (2017) and please note that there is no need to name every single female wrestler as you did in PG Era, WWE had 100s of wrestlers at that point, only the most prominent should be named, no overdoing. Wikipedia is not a place to promote personal views. Thank you. Dilbaggg (talk) 03:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to your question on my talk page:

no I don't think it will, as these days women are equal to men, and there are more women fan now then when the Rumbles actually begun in the late 80s, back in the 1990s women wrestling wasn't progressive and women fanbase was rare. Now women and children make over 60% of the wrestling fanbase and even men wants to see women in competitive matches, rather than pillow fights that existed in the 90s. The world has changed and women can do what men can do, so no it will never go back to being men's only Royal Rumble matches. But just like we do not add trivial information that 2001 Royal Rumble match was Austin's record 3rd rumble victory, or the No Way Out 2009 EC match was HHH's record 4th EC match victory, there is no need to violate WP:Trivial by stating that the 2017 Rumbles was the last "without women", and please refrain from WP:NOR violation, and just like we dont go saying that the SummerSlam 2000 TLC match was the first "men's tlc" match, just the first TLC match, we dont need to say the 2018 TLC match was the first women's TLC match, everything doesnt need to be highlighted because it is done for the first time ever by women. With that said women are the future of WWE, Becky Lynch is the most popular star since Rock and Austin, so the women's evolution will continue as long as the WWE continues to exist. But I hope you strictly follow the WP:NOR and WP:Trivial policy and don't over do things. I am just complying with Wikipedia guidlines. Thank you. Dilbaggg (talk) 14:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The New Era (WWE) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The New Era (WWE) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Era (WWE) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Czello 22:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just created the article Kentucky Wildcats women's volleyball. Kentucky_Wildcats women's volleyball

Kentucky Wildcats women's volleyball moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kentucky Wildcats women's volleyball, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just created an article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021-22_NBA_season

Concern regarding Draft:Kentucky Wildcats women's volleyball

Hello, CodyRhodesDiva. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kentucky Wildcats women's volleyball, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kentucky Wildcats women's volleyball

Hello, CodyRhodesDiva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kentucky Wildcats women's volleyball".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blading

On the article Blading (professional wrestling) you used Sportskeeda classified unreliable per WP:PW/RS and also added women WP:Fancruft and WP:Trivia. , everything does not become WP:Notable and special just because women starts doing what men used to do, and you have been asked numerous times in the past to go through WP:PW/RS to see what are reliable sources accepted for professional wrestling articles. Dilbaggg (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have added the incident of Britt Baker blading in AEW in 2021, using 411Mania which is classified WP:Reliable, per WP:PW/RS, so cheers I added the information you wanted but used a reliable source. Please next time just use the WP:PW/RS sources in wrestling article, I am just folllowing Wikipedia guidllines, thats all. Best wishes. Dilbaggg (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created an article [[3]]

Ruthless Aggression Era (WWE) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ruthless Aggression Era (WWE), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 07:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Preakness Stakes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2022 Preakness Stakes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Your edit to Draft:2022 Preakness Stakes has been altered, as it appears to have added copyrighted from https://247roadsideassist.com/oqtylp56/current-odds-preakness-2021 without attirbution and without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Pabsoluterince (talk) 09:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Preakness Stakes (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2022 Preakness Stakes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2022 Preakness Stakes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CodyRhodesDiva! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 15:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2022 Preakness Stakes has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2022 Preakness Stakes. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 16:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Preakness Stakes (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2022 Preakness Stakes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2022 Preakness Stakes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 03:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Preakness Stakes has been accepted

2022 Preakness Stakes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 09:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Given name, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Wcquidditch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, This is SportsCenter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The McMahon-Levesque Era (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The McMahon-Levesque Era and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 13:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruthless Aggression Era (WWE) (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruthless Aggression Era (WWE) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at I'm going to Disney World!, you may be blocked from editing. The source you provided doesn't extend past 2014, so I don't know why you would have thought it would be appropriate for a 2022-2023 reference. DonIago (talk) 07:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do anything wrong. BTW, here is Mahomes' Disneyland commercial to prove it.

[4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWjl9tcmmPc CodyRhodesDiva (talk) 20:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read the italicized part of my earlier comment please. DonIago (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ruthless Aggression Era (WWE)

Hello, CodyRhodesDiva. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruthless Aggression Era (WWE), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Southeastern Conference football season (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2023 Southeastern Conference football season instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 Southeastern Conference football season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2024 Summer Olympics Parade of Nations, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not use bare URLS Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Summer Olympics closing ceremony flag bearers moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Summer Olympics closing ceremony flag bearers. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Summer Olympics closing ceremony flag bearers (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This doesn't seem to be complete? Only one row in the table is filled out and appropriately sourced. Please ensure the article is ready for publishing before submitting it to AfC. I am happy to accept it once you complete it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Summer Olympics closing ceremony flag bearers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 17:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What should I add to the article? CodyRhodesDiva (talk) 03:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Summer Olympics closing ceremony flag bearers (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Case of WP:TOOSOON, the table only cites two of the country's flagbearers - needs to have the majority of the table completed - maybe resubmit after the closing ceremony has occurred.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Summer Olympics closing ceremony flag bearers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2024 Olympics Closing Ceremony.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:2024 Olympics Closing Ceremony.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 03:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited This is SportsCenter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jay Harris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]