Jump to content

User talk:MJL/Archive 26(a)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
You got handed a mess you didn't ask for, and you're doing a great job handling it not only on wiki but off wiki too. It may feel like a lot, but plenty of people appreciate the damage control you've been doing the last few hours. Let me know if you need help with anything. — Wug·a·po·des​ 05:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
I know there is already a barnstar here (I was going to give that exact one myself!), but I think you warrant more than one. From Discord, it sounds as if you have taken a day off work to defend the wiki. Now if that doesn't warrant a barnstar, I don't know what does. Regards, Giraffer (munch) 10:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


Good job. Here's a barnstar!

The Admin's Barnstar
This is already your third barnstar regarding your work on the Scots Wikipedia. The past 24 hours must have been really stressful for you, and you've even gone as far as to take a break from work to deal with this. I've also seen that you've been getting backlash on Reddit, and I also saw the message you got on Reddit that you posted on Twitter. Moreover, you've been talking to some news sites to act as sco's de facto PR. Talking to news websites, starting up an AMA, dealing with discussions on Meta, and handling the abusive words of internet trolls who have nothing better to do with their lives, all in the span of a day. That's gotta take some hardcore dedication.

You've received a lot of barnstars, but here's another one, to commend you for your being able to step up in the midst of internet backlash. You deserve it now more than ever. This could blow over relatively soon (and I hope it does), but history (at least for Wikimedia) will definitely remember your efforts.

I'm probably using a barnstar meant for English Wikipedia admins, but eh, I don't care.

and congrats on that IRL job promotion! Chlod (say hi!) 17:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Signpost article

Hello MJL,

You probably already saw the ping, but there's going to be a story in The Signpost on the Scots Wikipedia incident next month. Could you take a look at the draft article at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/News and notes ? Anything in particular you think that's misleading, or some topic not there that should be included? SnowFire (talk) 03:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

@SnowFire and Nosebagbear: Can we please call out the fact that Vice actually misrepresented what the Scots language even is (basically mixing it up with Scottish Gaelic). –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 06:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
That seems logical - but I didn't write that half (I made the CRC part) - I realise that's not clear, so you needed to ping both to be sure you got the right one. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, Vice & the NY Post's articles were tabloidy and horrible and just wrong. I'd say the Vice article's biggest crime is mixing up the time and over-emphasizing the amount of actionable negative feedback AG received before the incident, really - outsiders don't understand that two people showing up on your talk page to yell at you is the price of doing business, and quite under expectations for seven years of editing. SnowFire (talk) 11:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
@SnowFire: No, I would really say the biggest crime was misunderstanding the Scots. Factual inaccuracies, like the one you just mentioned, are expected and not damaging in the long term so long as the truth gets out there. However, misrepresenting what the Scots language even is can't be undone for anyone who has already read that article and walked away from it. It just shows how little they care, and I know they don't care because I emailed the reporter to explain this with no response. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
It's Vice, I wouldn't worry about it. A lot fewer people read/watch them than you'd think (I'd know, my old company used to put up some Vice content, and I saw the numbers.) For the reporter you emailed, see https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/06/inside-vice-media-shane-smith.html :
A senior manager once joked that the company’s hiring strategy had a “22 Rule”: “Hire 22-year-olds, pay them $22,000, and work them 22 hours a day."
SnowFire (talk) 21:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

"PopCulture.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect PopCulture.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 30#PopCulture.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:55, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:Cross-wiki abuse" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:Cross-wiki abuse. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 1#Wikipedia:Cross-wiki abuse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 01:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Adminship request

Hello

I have been a user on Wikipedia for a long time now. I wanted to acquire adminship to stop vandalism on particular pages that contain topics which are extremely communal in our country but are protected by extended protection. I request you to please nominate me as I gone through the Rfa guidelines and I think I am capable of being an Admin.

Thank you! Superbsic (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Long time? You've been here 6 days. qedk (t 愛 c) 08:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Superbsic: While I am honored that you came to me for a nomination despite us never having met before, but qedk seems to have a good point. Maybe you should wait a bit? Like a year? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 22:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Wayward Vagabond

Hello, yes my friend it is me , i noticed you message me, i hope you have been okay , i am all the more better from hearing from you. i missed you, you are always so kind and gracious, lots of love and best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.135.203 (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Yay!! Amazing! I missed you too!!! I'm not as active as I once was, but I still missed talking to you. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 14:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:PageLinks/redirect

Module:PageLinks/redirect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard/Issues/September 2020

Hello, MJL! Here is the September 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

ARCA

Hi. You can ignore the ping you'll get from me. I missed the meme on first reading and had to Google it to figure out what you meant. Newyorkbrad (talk) 08:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@Newyorkbrad: Oh lol. I had fair warning that not everyone would get it, but I couldn't help but say it anyways! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 00:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Sooo

As I recall, you went to scowiki to escape drama. How'd that work out? 😂 Anyway, I think you're doing a bang-up job of crisis management, you should send the WMF a bill when you're done. Lev!vich 05:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@Levivich: It's funny how things work out haha. I think the only person getting a bill any time soon will be my therapist, though.
In all seriousness, I really don't deserve much praise. soothrhins and my_hat_stinks have shown themselves to be better admins than the project ever could've asked for. While it's nice that Scots Wikipedia has me, the project is incredibly lucky to have those two. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 05:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Brian Wenzel

In May 2019 you tagged Brian Wenzel with BLP sources, citation style and tone. Could you clarify on Talk:Brian Wenzel what the issues are with tone? Newystats (talk) 23:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

[Help!] I don't know how to publish my article! (´0ω0`✿)

Hello sibling,

Thank you for helping me get my Draft:Jamie Peck article back, i actually just finished it! That is write, the first full draft is done!

My next question is how do i get my article added to wikiprojects, since i think that makes it easier for certain people to find them right? Then more obviously, how do i actually publish it?

Thanks! ~𝓜𝓙𝓛'𝓼 𝓔𝓿𝓲𝓵 𝓢𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓻 (talk) 02:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to DRN Event

Hello, MJL. At the direction of administrator Tenryuu, an event has been arranged to discuss the influence and inspiration the American Revolution on the French Revolution. You are invited to attend. Best Wishes. 021120x (talk) 12:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

021120x (talk) 12:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red

Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

TheWikiWizard-October 2020

Hello, MJL! Here is the October 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Nice to meet you, MJL. Enjoyer of World💬 10:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
@Enjoyer of World: Thank you, but I don't drink! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Lol, neither am I. Enjoyer of World💬 20:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Whack!

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeromi Mikhael (talk • contribs) 02:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

@Jeromi Mikhael: ? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I suppose you review my userpage? (My email says that you're reviewing my userpage) I think only mainspace articles should be reviewed...Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 03:03, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
@Jeromi Mikhael: Oh, well we need to review user pages as well in case there is any copyright violations or the like. You can read more about the process here. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
@MJL: Oh well then. If that's the case, please review my userpage....I have a lot of content in there....🥺 Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 03:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
@Jeromi Mikhael: No need, you first made it back in July. Cheers, –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is England Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by England Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. Botswana The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with New York (state) Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were Gondor Hog Farm (submissions), Indonesia HaEr48 (submissions), Somerset Harrias (submissions) and Free Hong Kong Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Nomination for deletion of Template:Old portal peer review

Template:Old portal peer review has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Marketing companies of Africa

A tag has been placed on Category:Marketing companies of Africa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Comunión Tradicionalista (1975)

Hello, MJL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Comunión Tradicionalista".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Is it bad I don't even remember writing this? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 00:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification of RfC

Hi, MJL. There is currently an ongoing request for comments here - Talk:French_Revolution#rfc_CF45697. The discussion will end on November 27th, 2020 and is seeking input from the involved editors. Best Wishes. 021120x (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, MJL. I noticed your comment in the discussion. All involved editors have been invited to participate, and I was not certain if you were informed. I myself received a message on my talk page inviting input. 021120x (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Scots wiki

Hi, how do i flag pages for deletion on Scots wiki if they are mostly from the known problematic contributor and/or of suspect quality and low importance? Irtapil (talk) 22:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

@Irtapil: If it is an article from a previously banned user or contains no Scots content, use {{Delete}}. If it is borderline notability, then you should use WP:VFD. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-November 2020

Hello, MJL! Here is the November 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December with Women in Red

Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your valiant efforts in defending the Wikipedia principles and preserving its integrity, I hereby award you the Defender of the Wiki Barnstar. GregorB (talk) 19:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks again on behalf of Croatian Wikipedia editors in particular! GregorB (talk) 19:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hear, hear! Nsk92 (talk) 20:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Well deserved!Thhhommmasss (talk) 08:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Glad all your hard work paid off! —valereee (talk) 14:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For being a kind person —valereee (talk) 19:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
@Valereee: This is too nice of you, haha. Thank you~! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 18

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past three months (September, October, and November 2020).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 18th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Updated scripts Twinkle has made a number of improvements, including using a change tag to identify actions made with it and automatically filing edit requests for protected XfD nominations.
SD0001's shortdescs-in-category is now compatible with scripts modifying category listings, such as Equazcion's CatListMainTalkLinks
GhostInTheMachine's TalkHelper2 is a newer version of their prior script, TalkHelper
GeneralNotability's spihelper updated to 2.2.10, fixing a number of small bugs, automatically tagging globally locked socks as such in the sockpuppet template, and restoring open cases following an SPI history merge.
Enterprisey's script-installer gadget has been updated with more internationalization of messages, as well as addition of a user preference, window.scriptInstallerInstallTarget to allow controlling where new scripts are to be installed.

Open tasks

Miscellaneous

My apologies for the delayed issue. As always, if anyone else would like to contribute, help is appreciated. Stay safe, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Human rights in Kazakstan

Hi there, Just wondering why Human rights in Kazakstan is tagged as a UPE violation?

Thanks, SixulaTalk 23:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

@Sixula: there was, in the most likely scenerio, WP:UPE edits made by users paid by the Kazakh government and/or PR firms associated with the same. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

@MJL: ah ok, thanks. Thanks, SixulaTalk 00:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Responding to your message.

Just wanted to clear things up - I'm not engaging in disruptive editing; I'm undoing actions of past users who have deleted much of the discussion on the talk page. The content should not be deleted for no reason. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbaker92 (talk • contribs) who is a confirmed sock puppet of Jzaooo (talk • contribs) 06:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

@Nbaker92: I could seriously not think of a more disruptive act you could do on a talk page short of outright vandalism. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 07:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome to that opinion, but that's all it is - your personal opinion. Making sure valuable discussion is not unnecessarily deleted is as far from "disruptive editing" as you can get. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbaker92 (talk • contribs) who is a confirmed sock puppet of Jzaooo (talk • contribs) 07:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Scott O'Grady & IHA

Hello MJL. As the "parent" for IHA, I think it is best if I bring up one of their recent edits to your attention. This splendid edit, located at Scott O'Grady, may have some WP:BLP; WP:POV; WP:UNDUE; WP:NOTNEWS; WP:INDISCRIMINATE; WP:LABEL and MOS:PROSE concerns. Normally, I would attempt to fix such an edit directly on the article page or TP, but I'm really not in the mood to have my motives questioned again, or engage with a battleground editor. Good luck! Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 06:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: will review when my wifi comes back. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 06:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: I have adjusted the edit. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@MJL: Thank you. If I see other less than ideal edits, would you like me to bring them to you, or would that be too much of a bother? --Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: I would prefer it here rather than seeing you two tear into one another on the article talk page, haha. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@MJL: I don't mind a good fight. But I'm planning on having a successful RfA in a few years, so I want a good reputation around here. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 17:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: My condolences in advance to you then, lol. RfAs are the most brutal hazing process this site is known to offer. If you want to increase your odds of getting through it, then you are going to want to find a different topic area (seriously). AMPOL is well known to be a cesspool of POV pushers and LTAs. Very rough stuff. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@MJL: Hmmmm...I could always join WP:GLACIERS, and write about glaciers for the next couple of years. But, who knows? There could be some intense POV pushers their as well! Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 18:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: You jest, but the pages with the most vile debates are never the ones you expect (speaking from experience). –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Advise on Abigail Shrier

Hi MJL. When you're not too busy, I was wondering if I could ask for your advise on Abigail Shrier. Apparently she's some sort of author/columnist who recently wrote a controversial book on transgenderism. Anyway, some user had been edit-warring in attempt to insert negative material or to 'debunk' the book in some way. By my count, 13 reverts within 24 hours:[1]. Every single one of their edits relied wholly on non-RSs or clear OR: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] (plus many more). Other uses, and myself, attempted the remove the BLP violations, but they wouldn't stop edit-warring. I eventually posted my concerns to the BLP Noticeboard. Shortly after that, an admin had enacted full page protection: [7]. I tried to explain to the editor on the TP that their actions violated multiple BLP policies, but they don't believe that they did anything wrong: [8]. The admin who enacted the protection was previously watching the page, but never made any attempt to revert the user's edits, or even issue a warning to the user. In fact, they reverted edits that were removed because they contained unreliable sources or OR; such as [9]--which clearly uses a SPS as a citation. I reached out to the admin and they said they are unable to take any actions against the editor, and they informed me that reporting the editor to WP:AN3 would be futile. I really don't know what to do. This is not a content dispute, and this editor has no business editing Abigail Shrier in any way. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: have you wrote this user on their talk page? They seem to need some guidance regarding WP:RS since we don't accept YouTube as it's WP:USERGEN.
Conduct disputes are best brought first directly to the editor in question. They should be given the chance to change after having been given a polite explanation of what was done wrong. If they refuse to WP:LISTEN, then it can be taken to the wider community for review (however always be aware your own conduct will be examined).
If I wasn't on mobile, I could tell you more helpful advice (for example, I saw a buzzfeed source in that WP:REFBOMB but don't know if it actually brings up the article's subject). That's just the situation we're in.
Also, whatever you do, be nice and respectful. Oftentimes, new editors aren't even aware they are doing anything wrong. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
@MJL: "Nice" is my middle name . What's considered a "new editor"? They have been editing since 2018, and by the looks of it, they have created 46 pages. After they ignored my comments in the edit summaries, I issued them a warning template for edit-warring and for inserting non-RSs. Are warning templates nice? Perhaps not... But it seemed like a standard case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT to me. However, I, and another editor, have been trying to camly explain to the user why their edits are no bueno on the article's TP. No luck so far... And no, the Buzzfeed source, nor do any of the other sources actually bring up the book or the subject. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 23:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: Hmmm... well WP:DTTR applies here then, and yeah they probably aren't new if that's the case.
I guess try to bring it to their user talk page then if they aren't responding on the article talk (assuming they have been active since your posts there). WP:Communication is required, after all. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello MJL,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

IHA

[10]: "I suggest you sit down and read the article". I am not going to tolerate this aggressive, uncivil behavior for much longer. I gave them the opportunity to apologize, they refused. Enough is enough. One more statement like this and I am requesting an interaction ban. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 05:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d: sighs... I'll talk to them off-wiki about it. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 06:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
@MJL: I appreciate it. --Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 06:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Target of snark

Since I think my comments might give the wrong impression, I wanted to be clear that I have no hostility / negative feelings / etc. towards you (as a result of that discussion or anything else). I am glad that you have agreed to mentor IHA, since I think they have potential to be a long-term positive contributor -- I hope it ends successfully. --JBL (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

@JBL: I mean.. I similarly have a generally positive impression of you. However, I must say I was rather... surprised by this response. It was a little.. uncivil? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 08:21, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. I do not believe I have ever been accused of being excessively civil when a disagreement becomes personalized (to be clear, not something I'm proud of, just a fact of life). Luckily, this was an easy enough discussion to disengage from. Anyhow, to reiterate, no sniping at you was intended; hopefully our next interaction will not find me needing to excuse myself from strafing innocent bystanders :/. --JBL (talk) 14:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Lol, yeah hopefully. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Flyer22 and WanderingWanda arbitration case opened

The Arbitration Committee has accepted and opened the Flyer22 and WanderingWanda case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 30, which is when the evidence phase is scheduled to close. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Workshop, which closes January 13, 2020. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. To opt out of future mailings please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Notification list. For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 19

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (December 2020).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 19th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Open tasks

Pending requests Pending requests

Miscellaneous

As always, if anyone else would like to contribute, help is appreciated. Stay safe, and happy holidays! --DannyS712 (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jasna Gabrič

Notice

The article Jasna Gabrič has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and being the mayor of a small town doesn't pass WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 15:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jasna Gabrič for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasna Gabrič is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasna Gabrič until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 01:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-December 2020

Hello, MJL! Here is the December 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard. Pilot Project, trying a smaller and different style newsletter

  • Here are the events of December 2020

Wikipedia News

  • On the French Wikipedia, the new vector skin design has already been rolled out! Check it out here!
  • Wikipedia will soon celebrate it's 20th Birthday very soon! Go back to 2001 by visiting nostalgia.wikipedia.org !
  • EN Wikipedia has more than 6,200,000 Articles!

Humor

  • Santa is watching you.... Don't vandalise Wikipedia, or he will reward you a block and no presents this year if you do so. (Seriously don't vandalise Wikipedia, even if santa isn't watching)
  • More turkey on Christmas

Notes

  • We are trying out this pilot style newspaper, making it easier for you, and our editors to use. Please let me know what you think about this new 'style' of newspaper!
  • The Wikipedia Ads section will be omitted, to make the flow of this newsletter easier. Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and stay safe! Happy Holidays --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

I wish you good health and happiness, MJL. I know I can be a pain sometimes, but I'll try to be better next year. I still have a lot to learn from you. Happy holidays!!
Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 21:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello MJL, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:05, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello MJL, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
FlalfTalk 04:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

25 December 2020

In lieu of sending out a Christmas card to all the good Wikipedians this year, I am just going to say Merry Christmas here to all my talk page stalkers!! –MJL ‐Talk‐🤶 20:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Arbitration case evidence

Regarding these edits: I'm not sure why you're abbreviating the editor's user name, particularly in the section title and the pro forma links to the user page, talk page, and contributions? I feel it's a bit confusing, and possibly a bit inconsiderate to use an abbreviated form.

Regarding the statements, I'm not sure how they relates to the goal of determining what findings (if any) should be reached. Without any further connection provided, they seem like non sequiturs. isaacl (talk) 01:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@Isaacl: It's still a work in progress. I plan on presenting a bit more with my remaining space. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:51, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
I thought that when starting to read your section, but then you ended with "That's all I got". Perhaps it would be better for you to draft your evidence elsewhere and transfer it when it is closer to complete? isaacl (talk) 17:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
[Forgot you aren't the type to like constant pings] I probably should've said "That's all I got for now." It was meant to be a close for the background portion. When I have the time, I will probably just fix it all up in one go. I prefer doing this stuff in one-to-two editing sessions. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Sure, but I feel it work better if you did those editing sessions in a local file or on a page in your own user space. If each edit doesn't work well as a standalone submission, then it imposes less cognitive load on those following the evidence if you avoid breaking up the related info into separate sessions. Regarding the user's name, as someone who has in the past raised concerns about how you were referred to, I hope you can appreciate that it can be a sensitive matter to use alternate labels, especially in places where it's conventional to use the full user name. isaacl (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Isaacl, this all seems like badgering someone who may be busy and is probably doing the best they can to keep all their plates spinning. Drop the stick. —valereee (talk) 01:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
We've been having a cordial discussion; the editor made a change, and I thanked the editor for it already. I only made these suggestions to help give MJL's evidence every chance of being seen in the best light. isaacl (talk) 01:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
@Valereee: It's fine, haha. I think isaacl is pretty chill. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 02:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
K, sorry both. I'm probably oversensitive right now. :) —valereee (talk) 03:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
@Valereee: Nah, it makes sense without the context of us both interacting with each other before. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

A New Year With Women in Red!

Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Self-alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

–MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

It works weird on mobile. Huh. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey

I said so with evidence. On IHateAccount's own talk page they received a warning for linking to someone's twitter that they were arguing with "doxing" Sorry, but when said person goes through my edit history and reverts said edits and contributes nothing to the page that is spiteful stalking. Sorry for the yawn, but I find their petty actions of not actually debating to be pointless and not respectful. Finally regarding the comment I found it sad that said person complained of abusive comments when they are the one who was doing "abusive actions". If you are speaking on said person's behalf then inform them to knock it off and learn to debate with people they disagree with. 3Kingdoms (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@3K: Take a look at this but pretend it's for you. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 02:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
I would like to say that I am sorry for the claim of doxing on IHA, it was an uncharitable reading of what was an honest mistake on their part and me assuming the worst, I removed said accusations from where I posted it since it should not be kept up. This was in part due to my annoyance at what I found to be the Wikipedia:Harassment by IHA on me and uncharitable reading of my own opinions, however two wrongs don't make a right. Since you have been contact with IHA, if it were possibly could you rely this to them, since I feel as another editor said, there should be a cooling off between the two of us. Thank-you. 3Kingdoms (talk) 01:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Hello MJL:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

Starzoner (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MJL/Archive_26(a)&oldid=1146362063"