User talk:Thhhommmasss

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Thhhommmasss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Thhhommmasss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quis separabit? 22:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: email

Hi there. I'm sorry if this sounds too blunt, but don't ask to ask - just ask. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thhhommmasss. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Croatian Wikipedia

Hello,

I happen to be aware of your recent problems with the hr wiki article on Jasenovac concentration camp, and by chance I just saw your message to Peacemaker.

Not too long ago, I wrote to Jimbo Wales on the topic of Croatian Wikipedia - the message is here.

There is zero chance of fixing these problems from within the hr wiki itself: not only it's impossible to change the offending encyclopedic content - it is also impossible to merely criticize it, because if you do, you'll sooner or later get blocked for whatever "reason".

The WMF, then? Highly debatable, unfortunately.

Feel free to contact me by email, if you prefer. GregorB (talk) 11:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a look at your Google document. I'd like to thank you for writing it. If anything, the current clique has been successful because, unlike the dissenters, they were coordinated, and in time they managed to break the opposition, one editor at a time. That's why it's important to document things and to coordinate efforts.

Things are serious. Here are some edits that will tell you all you need to know:

Zeljko: [1][2]
Mateo K 01: [3][4]

This tells you there are no coincidences and, furthermore, that no arguments will help. E.g. you might try to interest other editors in Kafić, but there are three types of editors:

The ones who will agree with Zeljko
The ones who disagree with Zeljko, but are unwilling to try their luck
The ones who left Croatian Wikipedia (either because they were blocked or because they gave up)

You might consider moving the text from Google Docs to your subpage, e.g. here: User:Thhhommmasss/Complaint regarding Croatian Wikipedia. The advantage is that you can also supply diffs (in footnotes, perhaps), and that other people may comment in the talk page.

Months ago, I was asked to write an article for The Signpost on the topic. I want to raise a stink and force the WMF to act. That's what I'm going to do, but I don't have a plan B at the moment. From what I've learned, I don't think appeals directly to the WMF will help - this is as much as I'm willing to say about it publicly. GregorB (talk) 17:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal at the Village Pump to streamline the welcome template

As a participant at the Wikipedia Welcoming Committee, you are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal to streamline the welcome template. Sdkb (talk) 04:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Istria

Hello again!

It appears broken refs were introduced by this edit. They might be found in whatever article the content was copied from. GregorB (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Report rule violations and abuse

Hello, Thhhommmasss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Report rule violations and abuse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Report rule violations and abuse

Hello, Thhhommmasss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Report rule violations and abuse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foibe massacres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Croat victims and prisoners of Italian WWII occupation.

Hello, I was reading about the Foibe Massacre and came across this section . I see that Slavs and Slovenes are mentioned but what are then stats on Croat civilians. I know a number of them were imprisoned in Italian camps as well. It seems only Slovenes are discussed? Also for Dalmatia in the 1800s, 85% to 90% of the population was Slavic but I couldn’t find the book you cited. Also what Slavs were these? Later it mentions Croatian Language? Thanks, I am not to familiar with this area of history. OyMosby (talk) 01:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

talk page usage

Please sign your messages consistently by using the four tilde characters (like this: ~~~~) otherwise the talk page becomes so much harder to read with if we don't see who wrote what and when. TIA. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources.

In [5] you mention that "you know these people". Please acquaint yourself with WP:COI. In addition, please observe proper sourcing practices as I mentioned before. If you know that a source mentions the factoid you are quoting, cite that source, not a newspaper article that does not. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In [6] you say "in response to repreat claims by Joy that he is not" [the son of ...]. This is simply not true. Please refrain from WP:casting aspersions. Wikipedia is edited through a collaborative process. If you don't understand the WP:BRD cycle, read up on it, instead of continuing to make further mistakes. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you think something was not cited correctly there are a number of ways to address this, including posting a comment on the Talk page, posting a need better source template, etc. Schreiner's book which goes into greater detail, including family relations, is specifically mentioned in the cited article. The articl also specifically states Ivan and Lily Ivanek were hung, which is what I cited, and news articles from mainstream media are deemed a RS, per WP rules. You yourself cited a couple of media articles Thhhommmasss (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not really how things work. Again, please read Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. If you make an incorrect change, it's normal for it to be reverted, and then the onus is on you to start the discussion and explain what you want to do, not the person who reverted the first bold edit. You should not just revert again and rant in an edit summary and then have to be reverted again, and then rant some more. That's the fundamental thing that you really need to understand about the process of editing Wikipedia, otherwise it's going to be really difficult. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dalmatia 19th and 20th century

Does it seem like the history section of this aryicle became more and more of an hisptrical Italian viewpoint of the populayions and culture of Dalmatia as if invented in the 1800s but Italian before? I am suprised a year went by and [non RS sourced addition was put in]. OyMosby (talk) 23:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing citations

Hi Thhhommmasss. You've been adding short form references (e.g. {{sfn}} or {{harvnb}}) to articles without providing the necessary cites. This means you additions are effectively unreferenced. For instance at Alojzije Mišić you added "Tomasevich 1975" and "Tomasevich" without a full cite to define what this works are. Also at Dalmatia you added "Tomasevich 2002", "Tomasevich 2001" and "Tomasevich". You will need to go back through you edits and properly supply cites to any additions you have made. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 10:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears similar sources are missing at Foibe massacres. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 10:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Foibe Massacres

Hello Thhhommmasss. It appears you have been attacked and called “genocide denier” here and I was attacked and accused of “making things up” here as well as in the edit diffs of the article. All by a user claiming this even was without a doubt ethnic cleansing and claims that the sources all say it and don’t say it was reprisal or not ethnic cleansing. Thoughts? Is this not violating Wikipedia rules on manners, discourse and consensus? I’m not looking to intentionally ignore sources. The person seems quite unduly aggressive. OyMosby (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thhhommmasss. I see your point, but please refrain from such edit summaries as they are not in line with WP:ESDOS and WP:DIS. We aim to promote a positive editing environment and ensure productive collaboration among Wikipedia editors. Thank you. --TadejM ^{my talk} 12:56, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lipa massacre (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Memorial Centre Lipa Remembers. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lipa massacre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

an error

I just noticed an odd statement in the lead of The Holocaust in the Independent State of Croatia, and fixed it (the qualifier wasn't in Europe, just in Yugoslavia); history check indicates this was introduced in this edit of yours. I appreciate that you fixed a citation-needed tagging there by replacing it with two references, but at the same time, it could have been done much simpler as an article lead section isn't typically supposed to carry citations for such a factual statement on such a well-researched topic; per MOS:LEADCITE something should only be cited if the statement is likely to be challenged, yet the challenge here was made in this 2019 edit that had no edit summary and was tagged minor by an editor who was subsequently banned from the topic of Yugoslavia in 2020. In turn, your edit introduced a random small factual error, the edit summary makes no mention of that, and I also notice it had a comma at the end of the sentence. It doesn't matter much now, but for the future, please apply a tad more care to avoid this sort of a churn. Thanks. --Joy (talk) 12:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lipa massacre

Hello, Thhhommmasss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lipa massacre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lipa massacre

Hello, Thhhommmasss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lipa massacre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]