User talk:Newystats
| This is Newystats's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
Women in Red March 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
AFCH review
[edit]When accepting an article, please check the article's title and see if there might be better titles, and check to see if the better title has an article already. You recently accepted Dennis Mannion (New Hampshire Politician), but Dennis Mannion (politician) already existed. I made the new article a redirect. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Scammer Payback
[edit]Hi, Newystats. Wanted to reach out about this. I rarely questions someone's decision at AfC, but would like your feedback here. I would love this guy to have an article. In fact, I started a draft for him a few months back. Didn't publish as I found he simply didn't have enough references that meet WP:ANYBIO. Is there something I am not seeing here? CNMall41 (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- The international coverage pushed it over the line for me, so there is the local Fox station News coverage, the The Siasat Daily, with coverage from the Indian end. There is (not in the refs in the article) coverage on Good Morning America. Newystats (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I didn't see this as your talk page was not on my watchlist (it is now). I still think the coverage is thin but better than what I originally found. I am actually here to let you know I sent Medable to AfD. Wanted to give you a heads up since I see you approved it. The user's submission of Draft:WatchBox led me to it. The references look good on the surface but when I dug further I couldn't find any that added up for WP:ORGCRIT.
Women in Red May 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:National directory of elected officials (France)
[edit]
Hello, Newystats. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National directory of elected officials (France), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Draft:Kusak Fort
[edit]Hi. I've just corrected the reference. Please give me a favor and review it again. Thank you! 137.59.145.211 (talk) 07:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on List of mayors of Nottingham
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of mayors of Nottingham, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:07, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - June 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
[edit]|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Help!
[edit]Hey! Newystats, could you please review my article Draft: Dargah Ustad E Zaman Trust Wikischolarrr (talk) 13:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women in Red
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Regarding Draft:Ami Dror
[edit]@Newystats: Greetings. Regarding Draft:Ami Dror, I believe you declining my submission on the grounds of sources is completely unjustified. In contrast to your claim, the article is sufficiently referenced and sufficiently sourced from numerous reliable news outlets from Israel, the U.S., China and India. These include The Times of Israel, The New York Times, CNBC, Fox Business, and there are more there such as articles in South China Morning Post, The Times of India, Haaretz, Calcalist, TheMarker and others, and these are just the ones that contribute to his notability from the entrepreneurial perspective without going into the many others in the Israeli press that refer to him being a leader in the ongoing struggle against judicial reform in Israel. Therefore, with that said, I don't think there is any room to doubt the notability of Ami Dror and I kindly ask that you reconsider your action and that you reinstate the article in the main namespace where it belongs. --Omer Toledano (talk) 14:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please help reviewers by removing some of the refs that are not independent, such as ref 2 in the current draft. 55 is a lot of references to wade through to find the ones that establish notability. More refs is not always better. When you have so many refs, it is helpful to highlight on the Draft Talk page which ones establish notability. Newystats (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- For example, this would be a stronger draft with only 1 of the refs 2,3,4 and only 1 of the refs 4,5,6 Newystats (talk) 21:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Newystats: Per your spec, I have removed redundant sourcing and stated the case on the article talk page. I have gone ahead and resubmitted. --Omer Toledano (talk) 03:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Newystats: Hi again, I've expanded about his activity and added an interview reference from Calcalist. Could you please advise? I don't see a justifiable reason for the constant rejection. Ami Dror is a notable figure in Israel. --Omer Toledano (talk) 08:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Newystats: Per your spec, I have removed redundant sourcing and stated the case on the article talk page. I have gone ahead and resubmitted. --Omer Toledano (talk) 03:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- For example, this would be a stronger draft with only 1 of the refs 2,3,4 and only 1 of the refs 4,5,6 Newystats (talk) 21:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Updated Draft:Liu Haowei for Further Review
[edit]Hi Newystats. Thank you so much for your comments in Draft:Liu Haowei . According to your instruction, I made some revision again. Kindly waiting for your further review. Best regards. Vanessa1014 (talk) 02:09, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Sovereign Right
[edit] Hello, Newystats. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sovereign Right, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023
[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November Articles for creation backlog drive
[edit]
Hello Newystats:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Yggdrasil Linux/GNU/X resurrection.
[edit]I noticed that you edited the paragraph on the proposed resurrection of Yggdrasil Linux/GNU/X. As noted in Talk:Yggdrasil_Linux/GNU/X#Dubious_resurrection I'm uncomfortable with it being there at all. Would you mind having a look and giving feedback please? Or delete it if you agree with me :) Many thanks. Kiore (talk) 08:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable. I've deleted it. Newystats (talk) 00:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
duplication?
[edit]This recently accepted page Chola invasion of the Anuradhapura Kingdom seems to duplicating a long standing existing page: Chola conquest of Anuradhapura. I think the new article should be redirected to the already accepted version which is better referenced and less politicised/nationalistic. Phrases such as 'Catastrophic Chola defeat' and the overall result being a "chola defeat' have a Sri Lankan nationalistic tinge not fitting of an encyclopaedia. Metta79 (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing @Metta79 - I tried seeing if the draft page was a candidate for merging, but missed finding Chola conquest of Anuradhapura. I agree, and will replace the content with a redirect. Newystats (talk) 22:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
John Haidar
[edit]I noticed that you re-edited the career section of John Haidar to include a negative review, which you'd published previously on the assumption it would mean the entry didn't function as an "ad". As noted in the most recent edit, it seems unnecessary to post a negative review, in accordance with comparable Wikipedia entries of artists and theatremakers. In effect, it feels deliberately targeted for this reason. Would you mind avoiding changing it back, please? It would be really appreciated. Dickens90 (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- If you can identify other theatremaker articles that only include the good reviews and leave out the negative ones, I'm willing to add the negative reviews there as well. Wikipedia is not a CV, and if a person is notable in wikipedia terms, covered in independent secondary sources, the most likely sort of coverage is a mix of good and bad reviews. Do you have an interest in the page on John Haidar only including one good review, rather than one good and one bad review? Newystats (talk) 08:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Amanda Jackes
[edit] Hello, Newystats. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amanda Jackes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Ami Dror"
[edit]As Israeli, I find it absurde that the English page about this person is defined by you as "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.". Dror is one of the key leaders in Israel, Personaly I'm part of a comunitry of close to 100,000 people that follow him daily on his whatsapp groups. (check is social media) - he is being quated and interviewed almost every day etc etc. https://x.com/faniaoz/status/1771595428573712817?s=20
I edited parts that were wrong, and this page need to be restored ASAP as it makes Wikipedia looks like a political tool which tries to hide the people that are working to change the Israeli goverment.
Thank you, Gili2011 (talk) 07:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. Notability in wikipedia has a particular meaning. The number of social media followers doesn't establish notability. What is needed is multiple, independent (of the subject), reliable secondary sources. Each of those requirements are required. See WP:PERSON for details about what each of those requirements mean, add those sources to the draft page and submit it for another review. Newystats (talk) 04:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Deletion discussion about Faaimata Hiliau
[edit]Hello Newystats, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Faaimata Hiliau, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faaimata Hiliau.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Clearfrienda}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
C F A 💬 01:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you!!
[edit]
|
The Systemic Bias Barnstar | |
| an uncommonly good revert Mr leroy playpus (talk) 01:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
June 2024
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at [[:Talk:Third umpire]], you may be blocked from editing. You are literally an AFC reviewer, I am surprised you still do not know that A-class articles NEED CONSENSUS by two different editors, not just yourself. 48JCL[citation needed][dubious – discuss] 21:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- if this is not your first time, making an article A-class rated then PLEASE revert the rest of these. 48JCL[citation needed][dubious – discuss] 21:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- 11 year old account, next time please remember. 48JCL[citation needed][dubious – discuss] 22:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Newcastle Greater Mutual Group
[edit] Hello, Newystats. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Newcastle Greater Mutual Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Marking dead link
[edit]Howdy! Just wanted to gives a heads up: I noticed that in this edit to 2NCR you marked a dead link dead by adding "url-status=dead", which won't display anywhere. For it to be seen you can instead mark it with the template Template:Dead Link or have url-status=dead as well as an archive-url link. More info about url-status can be found on Template:Cite Web under section URL.
Since I can't find an archive link, I've marked it as a dead link with the template GrapesRock (talk) 00:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:FLOTT (band)
[edit] Hello, Newystats. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FLOTT (band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging