User talk:Lonniemitchell22

September 2018

Hello, I'm General Ization. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Bunk'd have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. General Ization ^Talk 17:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Dora the Explorer (film) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. This page should not be moved via the regular process either until a WP:RS is produced verifying the film's title change. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Bizaardvark episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:17, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm YoungForever. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Station 19, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 05:16, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Enemy Within (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 05:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Template:Nickelodeon original series and Nicktoons. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. And Knight Squad and List of Knight Squad episodes. You need to learn how Wikipedia works or don't bother editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Knight Squad. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MasterChef Junior (U.S. season 7). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SanAnMan (talk) 11:17, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Queen of the South episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 03:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of original programs distributed by Facebook Watch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jett (TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 19:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of original programs distributed by Hulu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Light (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2019 in American television, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2018–19 United States network television schedule

Well I want on the 2018–19 United States network television schedule that we have to wait until TVBuff90 comes in to help Tim Brooks to do the top 30. --2600:1700:4300:2C8F:E8E4:CE44:40C:7FCB (talk) 17:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by HBO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dates in cite templates

Hello. You recently changed the formatting in the cite web templates with this edit at Mr Inbetween. Access dates are sometimes different than dates of press releases in Wikipedia, and, in particular, Futon press releases only include the release dates in their URLs. Therefore, whenever I add their press releases to episode tables, I never use the date parameter, only the access-date one. I will thank you for not correcting these in the future. — Wylie pedia @ 09:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the new source about the third Walking Dead seeies

I was hesitant to add it in its 2020 in American television because I felt like a premiere approximation wasn’t enough new information to justify making it the second source. I was gonna wait for the title and add that article as the source. Should today’s source just be replaced by it when the time comes?--Simmerdon3448 (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Search Party/Rick and Morty

I saw you did end up adding Search Party to programs returning in 2020. Its second season ended only a couple months after Rick and Morty, and in fact their upcoming seasons were ordered in April and May of last year respectively. Rick and Morty is infamous for its lengthy hiatuses at this point. Not only that, but animation takes time. I wanted to ask how you would handle it. I honestly don’t think Rick and Morty should be listed in the returning section for 2019, it just wouldn’t feel right, you know what I mean?--Simmerdon3448 (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charmed (2018 TV series), you may be blocked from editing. I am referring to the removal of the reliable source on the timeslot. — YoungForever^(talk) 05:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings table

Do not unhide the next row in a ratings table simply because the episode has aired. The row remains empty except for duplicate information (the title and the date), and therefore has no use. Only display it once ratings information actually becomes available. -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Can you fix this for me? Draft:Hero Elementary Demond Anthony (talk) 13:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Moodys (American TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 06:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2020 in American television (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Variety

Little America (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Variety

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of 2020 American television debuts, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of original programs distributed by Amazon does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Sundayclose (talk) 02:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of television series and films based on Image Comics publications

Can you help me to edit a page title List of television series and films based on Image Comics publications — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackknight1234567890 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2020 American television debuts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Too Hot to Handle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Bachelor (American TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC-TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in List of One Day at a Time (2017 TV series) episodes. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 02:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Stargirl (TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop changing citation style on the grounds of personal preference. Per WP:CITEVAR, which states: Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change. — YoungForever^(talk) 00:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Natalie Alyn Lind. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Race Factor Denier

They reverted again, so I reverted back. I don’t think they’re going to stop. Can we report them?--BaseFree (talk) 13:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's a plan. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve made a section…that he’s already gotten to. If you want to chime in, I’d welcome it--BaseFree (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Stargirl (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. Magitroopa (talk) 18:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

http://s.thefutoncritic.com

thefutoncritic.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Do you have a conflict of interest to declare with thefutoncritic? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon, you may be blocked from editing. You've been warned on this multiple times already. Please do citations correctly and use cite press release instead of cite web for press releases. Magitroopa (talk) 22:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Magitroopa (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Brec Bassinger. This is becoming tedious because you know what you are doing is wrong, based on previous reversions, but you continue to persist. Based on all the other warnings you've gotten lately, consider this a final warning. The next step is a noticeboard to seek a block. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Danielle Panabaker. You continue to persistently edit against the MOS (esp. MOS:DATERANGE) despite being warned multiple times about this. Next stop is a notice board. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:23, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting discussion for Template:Netflix original ended series

An article that been involved with (Template:Netflix original ended series) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (Netflix original ended series (2019+)). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Terasail ^[Talk] 11:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As a frequent contributor to the Netflix original ended series navbox template I am informing you of a split proposal.

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Weakest Link (American game show). This is truly your final warning, as you've been warned way too many times already. Stop messing with references at your own leisure, next will be a noticeboard discussion. Magitroopa (talk) 23:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Editing Category:BET+

A tag has been placed on Editing Category:BET+ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The category is located at Category:BET+; this was created by mistake.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 18:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very Important

Can you stop Lil MyMy1234 she claiming about Fancy Nancy getting Season 4 is a lie may you do it? TheTelevisionAssiant (talk) 01:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Outpost (TV series). You have a long list Level 4 warnings, and you think it's a good move to remove valid sourcing from an article?! Consider this your very last warning – your next stop is a noticeboard where I suspect several of us will be seeking a long block. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See this ANI thread for context. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lonniemitchell22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights I'm only trying to add more information. And I will try not to mess with any editing. Just please give me another chance Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 18:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 19:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot Don't worry, I won't cause any damage or disruption ever again. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 19:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To demonstrate that, please explain what you did wrong, why you won't do it again, and what productive contributions you wish to make. Specifically, please address the points made in the ANI discussion(linked above) in another unblock request. Someone else will review it, for fairness. 331dot (talk) 19:19, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lonniemitchell22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The Blade of the Northern Lights 331dot Magitroopa IJBall HeartGlow30797 Oshwah The reason I took off the reference in The Outpost (TV series) is because those season were over. I see other shows that don't have those references in previous seasons and only have them in their current seasons and wanted to give the same thing in The Outpost. But I should have asked first before doing that. The reason I do (Cite web) instead of (Cite news) or (Cite press release) is because I like it short, sweet and to the point. But I should have asked first before doing that. The reason for rearranging is because I like doing the cites like this: (Cite web last= first= title= url= work= date=). But I should have asked first before doing that. What I did wrong was not ask before I did any edits. I won't do it again because I realize that I'm not the only editor and I need to ask for permission before adding or changing something to a page. I would like for a page for an upcoming TV show or special to be added, to have more people contribute to adding programming to BET+ and have people add the upcoming programming to Discovery+. I've learned my lesson and I will work hard to make sure I prove it to you. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 1:52 pm, 9 December 2020, Wednesday (8 days ago) (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

The reply to IJBall down-thread is a step in the right direction, but insufficient given the past history of warnings. I would suggest taking a few weeks' break, then come back and file a new unblock request that concisely demonstrates a clear understanding of WP:V and the relevant discussions at WT:TV _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Which means you don't understand WP:V, and have not read WT:TV, where we've had several discussions that sourcing should not be removed even after an episode(s) have aired (for a number of reasons). The rest of what you say above does not demonstrate to me that you have learned from past mistakes (yet). If you want to get unblocked, you're going to have to demonstrate a greater understanding of your mistakes than this – "other editors were mean to me" is not going to cut it in this case. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also add in here... Honestly, the ordering of reference fields (the "Cite web last= first= title= url= work= date=" order you mentioned) is the least of my worries. I'd say that probably just comes down to preference, as well as just going by the order listed on the template page.

I don't really understand the explanation of using "cite web" as opposed to "cite news"/"cite press release"- "because I like it short, sweet and to the point"? The point of different templates is to be using the correct one for the given situation, not just picking which you prefer. Most of the sources you use from The Futon Critic (such as this from this edit of yours) clearly states "[via press release from CBS]" at the top of it. That would mean Template:Cite press release is the best to use for it, as it states, "This Citation Style 1 template is used to create citations for press releases." I'm even confused by your July 2020 edit on Rugrats here where you are changing already-existing citations from cite news to cite web. I've even previously warned you specifically regarding all of this- did you somehow miss it or just decide to ignore it? With that warning back from July and you still doing it up to now, it's clear you didn't change your editing habits/behavior from then.

Regarding removing citations from pages, I've warned you multiple times on your talk page, and I'm sure a lot might've had to do with that. Here's a few edits I later had to revert back where you are removing multiple citations with no explanation whatsoever. Yes, there are certain things that don't explicitly require a source (such as common knowledge), but removing sources for things such as air/premiere dates is not helpful whatsoever. In regards to my previously linked edit in this paragraph (source removals from List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon regarding Blue's Clues & You!)- yes, obviously now that it has aired, we know it premiered on November 11, 2019. However, it's entirely likely that not having the sources included there, a few years from now, someone can just change the date and then we no longer have any source to verify what the correct date is. That's why sources are used on Wikipedia in the first place- to help verify information, not just to have it be there and then get rid of it as soon as whatever it is has happened.

Just looking at your talk page alone, it seems you've received 8 different 'final warnings' since the first in April 2019, I'm not quite sure how it's taken this long for something to be done about all of this. Also interesting to note that prior to today, your previous time replying to something here was back in June, despite the countless warnings you've received since then, now today is the first time since then you've decided to respond to any sort of warning, and seemingly only because this time it was a block instead. Magitroopa (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IJBall I have read WT:TV and I finally understand WP:V. I finally realize the mistakes I made when it comes to editing. I really am sorry for the constant disrupting and if you unblock me I will do everything to prove to you guys that this behavior will never happen again. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I won't object to an unblocking at this point – but it has to be with the understanding that, 1) you will communicate going forward (as this has been one of the biggest issues with your editing), and 2) if you are reverted on something you will a) stop that kind of editing, and b) hopefully ask for clarification from whoever you reverted you so that you understand the issues behind the reversion. If you can stick to these behaviors going forward, you shouldn't be a "problematic editor" any longer. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can stick with them. Lonniemitchell22 (talk)

Just a note that I'm fine with the discretion of whoever reviews the unblock, no matter what the decision. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lonniemitchell22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the WP:V and the relevant discussions at WT:TV and I finally understand how things work here. I will follow all the rules based on verifiability and WikiProject Television. If I have any questions, I will go straight to the administrators and ask them before I edit. I have really learned my lesson and I will not disappoint you guys again. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've unblocked you based on the discussion above, but please be aware that it will be much harder for you to talk your way out of a block a second time. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

American Idol results color template

Hello there my name is TVSGuy, and I share an interest in television and reality programs such as American Idol. As I am busy in real life, I may not be able to do any big-scale updates and right now, AI was left with an incomplete update for seasons 4-15 (FOX-era) changing of the color templates to match the ones similar to seasons 16 onwards (ABC-era). If time permits, could you take your time to change the color templates to follow Season 16's format (you can use that as a reference; Seasons 1-3 so far have also done but seasons 4-15 are not).

I tried calling for others to help or even post on a noticeboard but there was no response however. I seems to lose hope until the premiere of Season 19, and that's where I find some of that to look for help if possible. I am glad that if you can do so, please let me know and if you are available to work on for the remainder of the seasons.

Thanks for your appreciation to help! TVSGuy (talk) 16:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

access-date

accessdate or access-date is the date you access the url, not the date you think is the publish date and the Futon Critic never explicitly stated that is the date they posted it, so please stop adding the publish date and using it as the access-date. This is considered to be WP:SYNTH, part of WP:OR. For example, this [1] is actually shows the published date at the top of the press release. The Futon Critic do not add posted date on TV listings press release themselves, for example [2], the published date is not on the TV listings press release itself. — YoungForever^(talk) 04:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Yet again...

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Game of Talents. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 03:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of The Good Doctor episodes, you may be blocked from editing. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added the sources where I got the information from.^[1]^[2] Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 21:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, they never stated that date as the season finale. You are still adding WP:SYNTH. Here is an example that stated the season finale:FBI:Most Wanted which states 5/25/21 as Second Season Finale next to the date. Here is another example: Prodigal Son which says 5/18/21 as the season finale next to it. Did the Futon Critic listed the dates of The Good Doctor and A Million Little Things as their respective season finale explicitly? No, they did not. All they listed next to the dates are TBA (*) which means you are adding WP:SYNTH which is WP:OR. We cannot assumed that they are the season finales as they still say TBA(*) next to the dates. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:26, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Shows A-Z – good doctor, the on abc". The Futon Critic. Retrieved April 9, 2021.
^ "MILLION LITTLE THINGS, A (ABC)". The Futon Critic. Retrieved April 22, 2021.

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Bloods (season 11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Burns.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SpoilerTV

Again, SpoilerTV is not a reliable source because it is a fan-operated website. So, please stop using it as a source. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just saw the message. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 21:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I highly suggest you knock it off again, otherwise you'll likely be blocked again, and likely be blocked for a much longer period of time if you don't stop. Magitroopa (talk) 04:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Miles Morales, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your recent contributions to Wikipedia. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!!! Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Good Doctor episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Blake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Shark Tank episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, March (TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 19:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello could you remove the note Produced by Warner Bros. Television and change Apple TV to Apple TV+ on List of WarnerMedia television programs? 85.255.232.172 (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on US Television Schedule pages

Hi Lonniemitchell22,

You’ve made many helpful contributions to the 2021-22 United States network television schedule page. I tend to the late-night, afternoon, and morning schedules. As you’ve noticed, TJ1523 is committing non-stop vandalism across all network schedules. Other users and I have reverted this user’s edits several times over to no avail. They seem to have no interest in discussing, explaining, or sourcing their incorrect information. How do you suggest we proceed? We could continue reverting the edits, but this troll seems aggressive… Thematrix92498 (talk) 21:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We can try blocking TJ1523. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think if this continues, we will have to. I don't see any other option. Thematrix92498 (talk) 01:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to List of HBO Max original programming

Hi, I recently reverted a few of your edits where you removed a few sources. The sources seem good to me. Am I missing something? Please ping on reply. thanks DarthFlappy 20:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to keep the sources when the show or movie premieres. Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 20:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please stop adding Production codes of yet to air episodes, they are not on The Futon Critic. You are adding WP:SYNTH information which is considered to be WP:OR. — YoungForever^(talk) 23:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Power Book IV: Force

A tag has been placed on Power Book IV: Force requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There is an actual draft article here Power Book IV: Force ready for article space which is blocked by this redirect, it would be very adequate if this redirect page was deleted to create space for the appropriate article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Motlatlaneo (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Weakest Link (American game show), you may be blocked from editing. Please stop. – BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve How We Roll (TV series)

Hello, Lonniemitchell22,

Thank you for creating How We Roll (TV series).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add details of reviews of the series in reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lonniemitchell22

Thank you for creating Dancing with Myself (TV series).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What I will do to the Spidey episode list?

I will remove the Director and storyboard credits. I hate repetitiveness on tables. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 21:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lonniemitchell22

Thank you for creating American Ninja Warrior (season 14).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CW programming

We are supposed to increment the number of episodes of a show once they have aired. So why did you change the number of episodes at List of programs broadcast by The CW to their scheduled number of episodes? They also can sometimes get cancelled before they can air. Linkin Prankster (talk) 12:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Superman & Lois (season 2)

Could you please do something to bring this to the mainspace? Already there is Superman & Lois (season 1). Kailash29792 (talk) 04:30, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page need to move to mainspace

Can you edit and move to mainspace of Draft:Batwheels please?

Batwheels is set to premiere on cartoon network and hbo max in September 17, 2022 Blackknight1234567890 (talk) 08:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing with myself contestant

Do you thing you can update that page and include participants? MarieMoring76 (talk) 22:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:March (TV series)

Hello, Lonniemitchell22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:March (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:March (TV series)

Hello, Lonniemitchell22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "March".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of accolades received by The Batman (film)

Hi Lonniemitchell22, did you create this draft? S0091 (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 16:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for removing the redundant content at The Batman (film) and adding the hatnote. I am the AfC reviewer who accepted the draft so followed up to see if that had been completed and was glad to see it was. S0091 (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Michael Bublé television specials has been nominated for deletion

Category:Michael Bublé television specials has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Game Show Show moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Game Show Show, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

America's Got Talent (season 18) draft

Hello, I attempted to create a page for the above season of AGT and noticed your draft. Would I be able to help you get this draft published into an article? Randazzojj123 (talk) 14:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 16:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Ramsay's Food Stars moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gordon Ramsay's Food Stars. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar and lacks any meaningful content. 14 sources cited for a one-line article points to some more work being required to even give the article enough content to establish notability or context.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LA Fire & Rescue moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to LA Fire & Rescue. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and Referencing is to non-RS sources (NBC sources on its own content are not sufficient to pass WP:GNG) and a one-line article doesn't establish context or notability for the program. . Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The ratings you have been adding aren't the finals

I notice you have been posting the Fast ratings and not the Final Nationals. Xeditboy (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're still adding fast affiliate ratings which are provisional and not final Lonniemitchell [3].

Programming Insider first publishes a list of "fast affiliate" ratings and then updates its article with final ratings later. These final ratings can be found below the fast affiliate ratings and read like this "UPDATED 7/11/2023 12:12 PM ET: What follows are the Live + Same Day rating results for the night’s network telecasts on Saturday, July 8, 2023."

Please take care to avoid confusing fast affiliate ratings (which are provisional) with final ratings. I hope you will also correct any fast affiliate ratings to final ones and avoid adding them in future. Thank you. Linkin Prankster (talk) 19:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fight to Survive

Since the show is a co-production and hasn't aired before on another channel, please stop showing it has 8 episodes. The format is to show the number episodes that have aired for non-acquired programming. Linkin Prankster (talk) 08:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Black + Iconic

The article Black + Iconic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shark Tank (season 15) (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Shark Tank episodes. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON/Probably doesn't need a standalone page, and the other individual seasons don't either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shark Tank (season 15) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LA Fire & Rescue (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no ratings or reviews to demonstrate notability, see WP:NTV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LA Fire & Rescue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 01:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lonniemitchell22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 01:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"2025 in American television" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2025 in American television has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 17 § 2025 in American television until a consensus is reached. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Next Level Chef Season 3 Article

How long til that Article gets started Season 3 is already 4 episodes in, and the article hasn't even started showing up, it is pissing me off! PartyD0ct0r32 (talk) 21:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lonniemitchell22. Thank you for your work on TMZ Investigates. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Fire (Season 12) & Chicago PD (Season 11) articles

I see an article was made for Chicago Med (Season 9), is it possible for someone to start an article for the other two shows respective seasons? Brianis19 (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deal or No Deal Island (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also where’s the critical reception?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deal or No Deal Island and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Damson Idris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Critics' Choice Award.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of The Neighborhood episodes, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please do not match WGA writers with the Futon Critic as WGA do not include episode titles, this is considered to be WP:SYNTH (a part of WP:SYNTH as we do not know the order for sitcoms and/or when drama series already have 1-2 episodes aired out of order. — YoungForever^(talk) 03:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

You are invited to make your case at this section of WP:Project Television about the issue with TV show seasons article titles. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BattleshipMan @Lonniemitchell22 Please be aware that this is a violation of WP:CANVASS. -- Alex_21_TALK 04:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lonniemitchell22. Thank you for your work on Crime Nation. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lonniemitchell22. Thank you for your work on MasterChef Junior (American TV series) season 9. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Probably too much detail on what happened during each show. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Again, please stop adding WP:SYNTH, we go by reliables sources. When it says "TBA", it means "TBA", please stop adding a date. — YoungForever^(talk) 22:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 9-1-1 episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Wong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Warning You often edit without using an edit summary. You have previously been warned about this twice, and you are still not using an edit summary to explain your edits, like this unexplained revert at List of The Simpsons episodes. Edit summaries are particularly important when you are removing references and sourced content from an article. According to the consensus policy, all edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious)—either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. This is your third notice, I suggest you start paying attention, and responding, to the concerns raised about your editing behavior. Isaidnoway (talk) 08:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:LA Fire & Rescue

Hello, Lonniemitchell22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LA Fire & Rescue, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Heather McMahan" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Heather McMahan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 18 § Heather McMahan until a consensus is reached. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 18:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Kids' Choice Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Russell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Rookie (TV series)

Template:The Rookie (TV series) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Alex_21_TALK 00:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Lonniemitchell22. Thank you for your work on Totally Funny Animals. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Needs independent sources which cover it. They exist. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Lonniemitchell22. Thank you for your work on Totally Funny Kids. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Needs independent sources which cover it. They exist. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good stuff. dxneo (talk) 02:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to All American: Homecoming, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Again, there is nothing wrong with "^|". WP:SNEAKY. — YoungForever^(talk) 15:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused

Please stop adding everyone on the cast list in the episodes, only the starring cast belong there FYI. Please read the details of the episodes on The Futon Critic which states state who are starring at the top of the episode listing details. — YoungForever^(talk) 03:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barney's World has been accepted

Barney's World, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Commander Keane (talk) 06:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Shows A-Z – good doctor, the on abc". The Futon Critic. Retrieved April 9, 2021.

[2] "MILLION LITTLE THINGS, A (ABC)". The Futon Critic. Retrieved April 22, 2021.

[1]

[2]