User talk:LaundryPizza03/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pervanadyl has been accepted

Pervanadyl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFCRC

No admins actively patrol AFCRC, so I recommend you make your requests at WP:AN or similar venues. Qwerfjkltalk 17:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

New message from IAmChaos

Hello, LaundryPizza03. You have new messages at Wikipedia:AFCRC.
Message added 07:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy Editing--IAmChaos 07:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Liberia

Uncostructive? I simply stated she won a Nobel Prize, probably you wanted to stress that that piece of information was superfluous. No, I have a profile in the Italian Wikipedia and I have been writing articles for Wikipedia for 3 years, more or less; from time to time I make tiny edits here. Nice to meet you :) --2.36.52.78 (talk) 10:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry about that. It has been restored. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry? Ahahah, that's all right! Officially, I left Wikipedia since I had troubles with other colleagues, I even won the Wikipedia t-shirt, which is something I am proud of. Even if I left Wiki.it, I still like to make some edits here and there on wiki.en, in particular, I like to add new links in order to link different voices, so that users can see the big picture. Have a nice day --2.36.52.78 (talk) 18:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Free Radio

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

That was a very fast page move, I just deleted that page through a PROD. Were you aware of the PROD or were you watching the Deletion log? I'm just curious because the page move happened just a few minutes after I deleted the disambiguation page. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

I put the page in my watchlist when I saw the PROD, as a reminder to do this after the page got deleted. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Comment on Wikiproject Mathematics

Your comments on WikiProject Mathematics directed to a new user posting in good faith are biting and can be perceived as mockery. Would you consider editing your post? SamuelRiv (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

What appears mocking is citing NOR and RS (on a Talk page) when the user simply said that they couldn't understand a section of an article. This appears to be something of a non sequitur. The user's past contributions seem to only have been in good faith. Their complaint is hardly uncommon for technical articles, especially for those introduced early in school like the commutative property. SamuelRiv (talk) 02:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Then I don't know how I should have responded. Maybe I should have done nothing, since another user had gotten to cleaning the section before I did. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Replication Crisis

Hi there, thanks for all your hard work on Wikipedia. I just saw that my edit on Questionable Research Practices in the article Replication Crisis was reverted. If you go to the source article by Glick, you will see that he got the 10%-20% estimate from Table III, which includes not only data from the FDA but also from one of his earlier studies on "university scientists". Judging from the general tone of the article, especially the first sentence of the abstract ("Approximately 10–20% of all research and development (R&D) funds are estimated to be spent on questionable studies, which are characterized by misrepresentation of data, inaccurate reporting, and fabrication of experimental results.") I don't think this estimate is focusing on the medical field between 1977 and 1990. However, I think you are right that it's a good idea to mention the time frame and source here. How about something like "according to medical researcher J. Leslie Glick's estimate in 1992, about 10-20% of R&D involve QRP?" Tommyren (talk) 20:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

List of Ford factories

FYI, that copyvio you helped with the removal and revdel of on List of Ford factories has been restored by the same IP, with a mostly-gibberish edit summary. --Sable232 (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Re: Accusation of sockpuppetry

LaundryPizza03, please see this report at the TAB (Spanish Wikipedia). This behaviour happened since August 2019. Thanks for raising this. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

@Amitie 10g: I opened a discussion about this issue at WT:SOFTWARE. Since this is alleged to be an LTA, should I cross-link the discussion from ANI? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

List of Airline of Wallis and Fortuna

Thankyou for nominating this non-list article for deletion. I am still puzzled why we have articles that are lists of nothing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

List of fictional antiheroes

Hey bro, can I edit the antihero list? There are some antiheroes missing from the list, from anime and manga CrocodileOtoishi (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

@CrocodileOtoishi: The inclusion criteria for the list are currently being negotiated. In the meantime, I would recommend that you provide for each entry at least two independent, reliable, secondary sources which characterize a character as an anti-hero. Unsourced entries will be removed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

List of science fiction sitcoms

Hi, quick heads up that I've pushed your prod over to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of science fiction sitcoms - based on the age of the article and number of editors I feel like it could use more eyes. Artw (talk) 15:54, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your contributions over the years... Keep it rolling! Volten001 ☎ 11:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

"Jesse Rice" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jesse Rice and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 2#Jesse Rice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:19, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Delsorts of Indian states

LaundryPizza03, shouldn't the states' delsorts also be under the India delsort, just like the Europe one. Some state wikiprojects don't have a lot of members, and some AfDs might be have low participation from the India wikiproject members if they are not intimated. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure if that's helpful for navigating by region, or if it would take up too much space. Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Punjab also presumably covers Pakistani Punjab. Would this change also work for U.S. states and Washington, D.C.; and Canadian provinces and territories. You'll probably get a better answer at WT:INDIA. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

"💃🏻" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 💃🏻 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8#💃🏻 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AKK700 06:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Never as Good as the First Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Almonte.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

ANI thread that may be of interest

[1]. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

PRODs

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

For some reason, some articles that you recently PROD'd are showing up incorrectly in our daily PROD list (seen at User:DumbBOT/ProdSummary) If you go to the very bottom of the page, you'll see a short list under "Failed to parse" that indicates some PRODs you tagged. This is a bit of a mystery because these mishaps usually happen when an editor manually adds a PROD template incorrectly and gets the date wrong or leaves out some information necessary for DumbBOT to list it in the chronological listing. But I see that you used Twinkle so this should not have been a problem. But I thought I'd inform you about this in case it continues to be a problem.

Luckily, we have a backup listing, in Category:Proposed deletion as of 12 July 2022, so I could see that there were other PRODs that weren't listed in the ProdSummary and try to find the reason why they weren't appearing there. It's always good to have redundant systems to catch things that might otherwise fall through the cracks.

In case you don't come back to edit Wikipedia for a few days, here's a link to the version of the page I'm looking at right now. Once the articles are deleted later today, they will disappear from the list and so this link will show you how the list looked when I left this message on your talk page. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:48, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

It usually happens if there is a template transcluded in the rationale. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh, okay, thanks for filling me in. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

We're famous!

See Talk:Variable_speed_of_light#Unfortunately_incompetence_in_wikipedia_editing and Talk:Planck_units#How_can_we_have_incompetent_activists_edit_this_page. XOR'easter (talk) 21:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chah Bahar (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chah Bahar, Markazi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

One sided and tyrannical behaviour and banning individuals on Wikipedia that disagree with Pizza's ideology

You and Schreiberbike have accused me of vandalism and unconstructive editing on one Wikipedia article (the article about evolution).

I want the proof of my editing being unconstructive and an act of vandalism.

In order to make a final editing, editors must make a civilised debate on it and then together decide what will stay on, what will not.

I do consider that Pizza dc and Schreiberbike with Douglas Weller have abused their privileges, attacked and banned me for no reason. Emirthesenat (talk) 07:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Related: Wikipedia:Teahouse#Admin_abusing_his_privileges. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:13, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

False-positive detection of prior AfDs by the {{prod}} template

You've recently been prodding a few pages for which there's been an AfD of a page by the same name (but the AfD was for a disambiguation page, rather than an article, so it isn't the same page and doesn't block the prod). As a result, the {{prod}} template, which doesn't know that the AfD was about a different page, thinks there may have been a previous AfD and complains.

In this situation, you can make the prod with {{subst:prod}}, then (after the edit has saved) edit the page again and add a priorafd= parameter to the {{proposed deletion/dated}} template, explaining what the previous AfD was about; that'll allow the template to recognise the false positive. (I did this in, e.g., this edit.)

I noticed you left a comment on one of the articles trying to explain, and the situation seems to be coming up repeatedly, so I thought I'd let you know how to handle it if it happens again in the future. --ais523 02:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, this functionality is not in Twinkle. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:29, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Recent PRODding

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

On a typical day, there are between 20-50 articles that are reviewed each day as Proposed deletions. The other day, you tagged 163 articles with PROD tags! That made 175 articles to be reviewed as PRODs a week from now, and, even worse, they were tagged to expire over a short period of time, like an hour. Each PROD has to be reviewed to be sure it has not been PROD'd before and also to make sure that no editor has objected to the PROD on the article talk page. These tasks typically don't take a lot of time but that's when we have 20-50 articles to look at over the course of a 24 hour day, not hundreds over an hour. Also, another editor PROD'd over 300 articles one day a couple of months ago and the response by other editors was to do a mass de-PRODding, just to object to having to spend so much time reviewing all 300+ articles that had been tagged for deletion. Then many of those articles that were PROD'd and then de-PROD'd had to be sent to AFD for individual discussions which took up a lot more time. I'm sure you don't want other editors to mass untag the articles you PROD'd or else you wouldn't have tagged them for deletion. Additionally, there are basically 2 admins who do the bulk of the job of reviewing all PRODs with a few others who help out occasionally. Again, it's not a lot of work to do when there are two dozen PRODs a day but when you get into the hundreds of PRODs, well, it can be very time-consuming work to double-check the tagging of all of those articles to make sure the tagging is appropriate.

Fortunately, there is an easy solution to these issues which is simply: Pace yourself! I know editors get "on a roll" once they start a project but you don't have to tag over a hundred pages in an hour, try, say, tagging a dozen or two dozen articles over a day, each day, over the course of a week. This will help out the admins who review PRODs and also not send your fellow editors on a mass untagging spree because of the surge of PROD tagging. Same amount of articles tagged for deletion but just spread out over a longer period of time. Does this sound reasonable?

Finally, it's not an important point but I just want to add that I personally have no problem with you tagging these articles for deletion, it's just the volume of articles tagged over the course of a short period of time that I'd like you to adjust. Thank you for all of your work on the project! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Okay, I'll do only about 20 at a time. That should keep the workflow manageable.

This is a test of paragraph breaking in the reply tool. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your speedy deletion nomination for File:Information.svg

Hello User:LaundryPizza03, regarding the notice you left me in Special:Diff/1104098150, I certainly contest this nomination. The history of that file description does not show that you actually tagged the page, and I don't see a good reason why that that page should be deleted under CSDF2. There is a current file attached, and this is a highly used image with over 8 million file links reported, which is why it is kept local. What is going on here? — xaosflux ^Talk 17:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Bundled AFDs

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

I hope you are well and enjoying this weekend. We are having near-perfect summer weather here in the Northwest so I don't know why I'm here, editing Wikipedia!

I recently ran into a bit of trouble with an AFD you put together, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ain Ali. XFDCloser was confused by the format of the nomination and would only delete the first named article so I deleted the rest manually. Not a big deal but I haven't had this trouble with other bundled nominations. I looked at WP:BUNDLE but it doesn't offer a lot of information on what might be causing the problem.

So, I'd like you to try something, next time you nominate multiple articles in an AFD, either list all of the articles at the top of the nomination and THEN present your deletion rationale or use the following format that BUNDLE recommends:

I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:
:{{la|related article 1}}
:{{la|related article 2}}

Or, you could look at other bundled nominations and see what format those nominating editors used.

Secondly, I noticed that you have been PRODding a lot of articles lately (which is fine) but not posting user notifications. This is fine if they are articles by Carlos because he has basically left the project but for other editors, please do not uncheck "Notify page creator". I have the feeling that these are all articles by Carlos but I thought I'd mention it any way. Thanks again for your diligence in helping us clean up Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, again, LaundryPizza03,

I know you are plenty busy cleaning up these geo stubs on villages, but I just deleted a lot of articles you PROD'd last Wednesday and when I do this, I also remove links to the deleted pages. They are mostly links from geography templates but I saw a couple of links were to disambiguation page Chah-e Shirin and other disambiguation pages. When I looked at this page, almost all of the articles listed on this page were either deleted or about to be deleted.

So, if you have any spare time, since you are familar with the most common names of the villages that have articles that have gone through PROD or AFD, you might look at pages in Category:Place name disambiguation pages that no longer disambiguate existing articles, and tag them for deletion either through PRODs or CSD G14. Just more work to do should you be wanting to switch up tasks! Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:26, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

@Liz: Is there a tool that will make it easier to locate such pages, other than Special:PrefixIndex? A lot of the dab pages created by Carlossuarez46 also seem to be WP:PTM, e.g. Ab Chendaran. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:59, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Help with editing

Hi, I am wondering if you can help me add entries to disappeared lists. I am swamped with editing and can only do so much at a time. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

@Davidgoodheart: Not enough context to answer your question. Which lists are you referring to? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:42, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Adding entries to articles like the List of kidnappings and List of solved missing person cases. Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

I probably can't help you with that topic area. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Category:Fictional locations by location has been nominated for merging

Category:Fictional locations by location has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Beryllium

I am so grateful for your support. You wrote only one sentence, but it was a soothing experience. Thank you :-) 85.193.215.210 (talk) 01:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Veterinarian access to street drugs/lethal pharmaceuticals

I live in Harrisburg, PA USA…I am disabled & home bound except dr/specialists appts & surgeries. 10+ yrs ago, I made an accidental discovery. My dog needed Rx to calm down from gun shots, frequent fireworks, thunderstorms, n there like. I rather new licensed veterinarian from remote area used by farmers decided to do house calls. She came with Rx, supplied by pharmaceutical companies, I’m guessing. Within 1 month, my sweet border collie lab 105 lbs, was down to 50 lbs, walking into walls n falling over. I called my vet for emergency appt n was told he was too far gone, n put down. It was result of that Rx, forget name. I immediately reported to that prescribing vet n was told not to call her again. Dr. Diane Ford, VMD. I later discovered the referring neighbor had substance abuse problems for 18 yrs, was driving to remote vet & acquiring her fix several times per week. My point is, remote vets with access/well-stocked & was a side biz for human dependency. After a week of losing my family member/dog, I reported it to my family vet clinic of 40 yrs. They wanted all info n she was reported by my vet. Within a few months, I found out remote veterinarians were a primary source of drug trafficking. Please investigate these remote farming vets as it’s popular source of street drugs/side income. Vets need monitoring n limited access to pharmaceuticals/proof of proper usage for animals, inventory, documentation of who/what farmers n animals are actually using for necessity. Furthermore, farmers should be required to annual reporting of type of animal, Rx, frequency/dosage, n medical diagnosis. I never hear about vets busted for dealing for human consumption. I’m sure across USA n via internet, this is a bigger problem & goes unreported. Thank you for allowing me to make public aware & hopefully increase employment to handle this type of monitoring. 108.15.245.17 (talk) 08:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Gender reveal party, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Testing reply feature with custom edit summary. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Dictator

I like your comment in page of ANI: the political abuse of label "dictator" by many editors is a flag of ideological slant by many accounts and this is huge problem regarding neutral version of articles about historical personages. I made several actions or edits in articles and related talk pages versus this kind of editors who have a blatant ideological slant regarding communist dictators: they remove sistematically label "dictator" near names of communist personages but they put same label "dictator" near names of fascist personages in maniacal manner! From this problematic situation I started several discussions with various users but I just want to find a friendly agreement with them, but it is a complicated operation via ANI for request of block versus my account for alleged accusations regarding silly facts. Forza bruta (talk) 23:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Plip!

You've been whacked with a WikiMinnow.. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you might have done something silly.

If IPs never made accounts, talk pages would get real hard to read after a generation or two! GabberFlasted (talk) 16:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 20:26, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, LaundryPizza03!

Happy New Year!

LaundryPizza03,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Σ− atom

Hello, LaundryPizza03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Σ− atom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Mundilfari (moon)

Nice job creating these informative stubs on the moons of Saturn. Very nicely done. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Moon

Apparently you read about Saturn's moons. You made a mistake on a related article.Highwatermark1 (talk) 04:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

@Highwatermark1: Which one? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

The one on which you reverted me.Highwatermark1 (talk) 05:09, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

User:Highwatermark1 - Telling an editor that they made a mistake is more annoying than useful. It is in general not constructive to say that editors are editing incorrectly or are mistaken is not helpful. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

LP, Ymir is the second largest member of the Norse group after Phoebe. Its orbit is the largest of the moons which take longer than 3 years to orbit Saturn. You are unclear while editing that section.Highwatermark1 (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Robert, you can see LP did not reply. The user is in error and not much can be done because they would revert changes to articles about Saturn.Highwatermark1 (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

ANRFC

Hi LP03. You recently posted some old RfDs at WP:ANRFC for closure. I think the comments you've left do not meet the "brief and neutrally-worded request" guideline at the top of the page, as you're suggesting how the discussions should be closed. Would you be willing to remove those parts of your requests? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

@Firefangledfeathers: Then how am I supposed to report them? Many of the listed RfD's seem to have clear consensus that requires admin implementation. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I'd recommend something like:

• Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_27#Brian_O'Conner/archive: just a trickle of comments in January.
• Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_4#Timeline_of_Square: only a few comments in the past two weeks.

Comments that are about why the discussions are ripe for closure, without suggesting a specific close. Does that make sense? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

@Firefangledfeathers: I did some cleanup based on your suggestions. Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_January_15#Grease_(country) has recent participation, but I'm still confident that this is a solid no consensus based on the amount of disagreement with no relists. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Looks great. I'm sorry to have come to you with such an ass-ache of a suggestion. I would trust your instinct on Grease (I haven't reviewed the discussion), and you could just say something like "I think this is ready for a close". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

17 June 2022 edit to "Osmium"

Greetings and felicitations. I just found this edit of yours and I'm afraid that I don't know how to solve the "Cite error: The named reference 184os was invoked but never defined". Would you please be so kind as to take it off of my hands? —DocWatson42 (talk) 12:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done Corrected to 184Os, which is the name of a citation used in Template:Infobox osmium isotopes. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Σ− atom

Hello, LaundryPizza03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Σ− atom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

New message from Lemonaka

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/УагаПесар. Previous socks were found by you. I'm not familiar with Japanese, hopefully you can help me a while. Lemonaka (talk) 14:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Math rap relisting

Just wanted to point out that the RfD relisting was an involved-relisting, since you voted first, and then relisted. You should have waited for another editor to decide if it can be closed or relisted. Jay 💬 08:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Quick note regarding WP:RFCLOSE

Thank you for taking the time to list the RfD discussions on WP:RFCLOSE. Just as a heads up, I've re-ordered them and added the type=xfd value to the {{initiated}} templates in these edits. Within discussions of the same type, the board sorts by the date when a discussion was initiated, with the oldest on top. The type attribute also can change the length of time that is required for the colors to change on the date, depending on the type of discussion. Happy editing! — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Sockfarm

Hi, it is regarding this edit by the banned sockfarm [2], username, editing area, et al. I believe their edit needs to get WP:BANREVERTED and new SPI case be filed. Please do the needful thanks. - 117.201.115.37 (talk) 09:23, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

i'm not yet convinced that this is actually a caste warrior, like the other user, but the meaning of the name might be enough. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Well, I'm very much sure this is the same caste warrior. Thanks for opening a new SPI. I've added two very similar diffs— from a confirmed sock and from this new one here. I believe this latest edit needs to be banreverted as well. - 117.201.114.187 (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Another thing is that even if it clears MEDRS, gentics is not allowed in Indian caste/community articles per consensus, something which this sockfarm is trying to add. - 117.201.114.120 (talk) 10:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Pronunciation of Loughborough

FYI only, just to note my request at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Pronunciation of Loughborough. No need to do anything (unless you have the book!) 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 10:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

CFD

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

Thank you for closing all of those category deletion discusions. CFD doesn't get a lot of attention from admins and so relies on editors to do NAC closures. I appreciate you closing out the discussions, emptying or recategorizing the categories and then tagging them for deletion. Thanks again! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

I'd just like to echo Liz. I've been burnt out from closing CfD discussions lately, and I appreciate your work closing these discussions. — Qwerfjkltalk 19:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, thanks from me too!

After closing, please follow WP:CFDAI to implement the closes, or list them at WT:CFDW to be implemented by admins. Qwerfjkl has come up with a neat way of recording them there, ready for pasting into the Working page, but it's not essential to record them that way.

I noticed that you have done half a dozen copy-and-paste moves of category pages. This is no more advisable for categories than for articles, as it loses (i) page history (attribution to original authors), (ii) talk pages and (iii) interwiki links at Wikidata. Also, it's more work for you to move all the member pages, than to wait for a bot to do the heavy lifting.

I've undone six that I found, including Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 15#Works by fictional setting (apologies to Explicit for the resulting UNDOs here and at Wikidata).

I acknowledge that there has been a further backlog in transferring the Non-Admin Closes from the talk page to the Working page, but please be patient, or post a request at WP:CR or WP:AN if no admin gets to them within a few days. – Fayenatic London 14:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

I use this script to list discussions. — Qwerfjkltalk 11:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!

Appreciate the multiple saves, my attempts to clean up the comic articles seems to have caused even more mess! Thank you for your patience and help =) BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome. I routinely do an AfD whenever I notice an article that was PRODded twice. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Procedural relisting

It would appear that there was no CFD template here because a bot removed it on 3 April. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Magical alphabet(s)

You cited WP:SINGULAR in your page move. Have you read there the sentence, "Exceptions include... the names of classes of objects (e.g. Arabic numerals or Bantu languages)."? – .Raven  ^.talk 16:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure that this is a "class" so much as a "general concept" like Constructed script. The magical alphabets are not necessarily related to each other. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Their commonality is their use in and for magic. That's what the article covers. The topic is not any single alphabet called ['the'] "magical alphabet". – .Raven  ^.talk 23:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 April 3#Category:World Champions in 5.5 Metre

I don't think it was the will of the users involved to merge the Category:International 14 world champions to Category:Soling class sailors. May I 1) remove the five (I think it was) articles from the Category:Soling class sailors; 2) (re)create the Category:International 14 class world champions (proposed name from discussion) or does it need something more formal before? Kaffet i halsen (talk) 07:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

You will need to appeal to WP:DRV if you believe that my decision was incorrect. I'm still learning this stuff, so feedback will be greatly appreciated. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I'll write some lines there. One could probably argue the nomination could have been smaller to be more clear. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 07:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Here it is: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 May 9 Kaffet i halsen (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

CFD on Category:French Polynesian lawyers

Re: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 April 30#Category:French Polynesian lawyers

Since you've closed this I've managed to find more articles, so that it no longer meets WP:SMALLCAT. Can the decision be reversed? IdiotSavant (talk) 00:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@IdiotSavant: I don't know what the correct procedure is in this case. I have asked WP:AN for guidance. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. IdiotSavant (talk) 02:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Categories & CSD

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

Just a head's up, categories can't be tagged for speedy deletion unless they are emptied. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

CFD closures

If you're going to close this discussion as merge, shouldn't you merge the categories? The same holds for the other CFD discussions you closed. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 01:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I have a script that automatically lists closed discussions at WT:CFDW, where they will be processed by an admin: User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/CFDlister. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok, that's good to know. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 01:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Please respect editors

Hi. On 21:21, 30 May 2023 you posted a thread to merge a category. The problem is in the uncalled for language that you used. You stated, "Even more WP:SMALLCAT garbage in the Category:Assassinated politicians by time tree created earlier this month by Thinker78 (talk · contribs)." Although I believe in freedom of speech, my experience in Wikipedia has shown me that editors who use such language most of the times don't care about freedom of speech themselves and simply behave in a rude manner without respecting their fellow editors. Therefore, I remind you of the civility policy, "editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect. They should focus on improving the encyclopedia while maintaining a pleasant editing environment by behaving politely, calmly and reasonably, even during heated debates." I hope the discussions in the future become more collegial, abiding with said policy. Sincerely, Thinker78 (talk) 21:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: HD 27563 has been accepted

HD 27563, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Suggestion for updating the wording on a CFD nomination

I'm supportive on the merits of your recent nominations for assassination categories but I'm not wild about the civility in the wording of this particular one. Would you be open to striking the word "garbage" (garbage)? - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Cossacks

While I agree with nearly all of your closings, I think this one is an unfortunate misunderstanding. No real arguments have been offered for deletion, it is just a matter of clean-up, and the clean-up already happened. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

@Marcocapelle: The outcome has been updated on your input. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Query

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

Regarding Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 26#Expatriates, a lot of expatriate categories showed up tonight on the nightly Empty Category list. Can these be safely deleted now that they have been emptied? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

@Liz: Just use {{db-xfd}}. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Request

Perhaps you could have a look at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 May 1#Various emigrants which seems to have been forgotten (more recent ones - Emigrants from former countries (7 May 23) and More emigrants (11 May 23) - were closed as merge weeks ago, and you closed the similar Expatriates (26 May 23)). — Oculi (talk) 11:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Censorship of wikipedia

Wikipedia is not censored! Why are you deleting critical information from wikipedia? There are plenty of evidence that google maps, apple maps and others are removing details from sites. Even gizmodo reported it. https://gizmodo.com/access-denied-18-places-google-maps-wont-let-you-see-5801644 Noroots22 (talk) 10:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

@Noroots22: I wasn't trying to censor you. At List of satellite map images with missing or unclear data , there is agreement that secondary sources are required for all new entries — using a satellite map as a reference violates our policy against original research. On the other hand, the source you provided this time would be acceptable. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Centaurus X-4

Hello, LaundryPizza03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Centaurus X-4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

CfD result next steps

Hi, I filed Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_18#Besta_deild_kvenna, which was approved for merging/renaming, but it's unclear what the next steps are or if I have any further responsibilities in the request. I've read WP:CFDAI and looked at WP:CFDW and WP:CFDWM but don't see them there, and I haven't seen any changes in the category pages themselves. Is there anything further needed from me? I don't want to block out of ignorance of the process. -Socccc (talk) 00:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@Socccc: Please see WT:CFDW, where it will be shortly moved to the main page by an admin. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@Socccc: I just caught up with feeding those requests to the bot. It should be finished within half an hour. – Fayenatic London 12:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: R Trianguli has been accepted

R Trianguli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 8 Ursae Minoris has been accepted

8 Ursae Minoris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Got another possibly non-notable TV show for you to look at

Beach Clash. Only 32 hits on Google for "Beach Clash" + "David Hirsch", and the Encyclopedia of TV Game Shows is the only one on GBooks. Newspapers.com only turned up TV Guide listings. I bet not even Cunard could conjure up anything for this one. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Do you think Cunard is WP:REFBOMBing? They seem to think that random one-sentence blurbs constitute significant coverage. I disagree that any of the sources added to that article are WP:SIGCOV. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

I cannot comment on this. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Title of Lists of ferns and fern allies of Great Britain and Ireland

I closed the RM at List of mosses of Great Britain and Ireland#Requested move 27 June 2023, without noticing the difference in title here. This doesn't seem to be a list of lists, and the only other similarly-titled article (List of ferns and fern allies of Soldiers Delight) uses singular List instead of plural Lists. Was this intended to be a plural "Lists of" title inconsistent with the rest of the RM? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Arab

Hi LaundryPizza03, please would you reopen the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_12#Category:Arab, as it has not yet been implemented, and I would like to present fresh arguments?

This category is the top Arab-related parent of the categories Arabs (biographies), Arab world, Arab history, Arab studies and Anti-Arabism, as well as the article Etymology of Arab. It seems to me that it should be retained as the main category for Arabs within the hierarchies for ethnic groups. Although the discussion was open for two weeks, participation petered out after 2 days and did not consider the above. This may be partly because various CFD regulars were tied up at that time with heavy processing workloads from other CFD pages. – Fayenatic London 12:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

@Fayenatic london: I'm not sure if I need to go through WP:DRV first. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

No, you don't need to do that; as closer, you can choose to reopen. DRV is only invoked when the closer declines to reopen a discussion. – Fayenatic London 12:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

@Fayenatic london: Done, see today's CfD log. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! – Fayenatic London 13:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)