User talk:Kingsman3

Hello, Kingsman3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kingsman3/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Kingsman3/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kingsman3! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Firkal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Do not copy-paste refused AFC submissions into article space - a refusal at AFC shows the article is not suitable for mainspace - Arjayay (talk) 12:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Firkal, you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not paste refused AFC submissions into article space - a refusal at AFC shows the article is not suitable for mainspace - Arjayay (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Firkal.
It has repeatedly been explained, that you should not create such articles - a refusal at AFC shows the article is not suitable for mainspace - Arjayay (talk) 09:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why my artice is not publishing?

I assume you are discussing Draft:Firkal. You removed most of the content with this edit. If you reverse that edit, it will restore the information required to submit the draft for review. 331dot (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But, if the draft was previously rejected, you cannot resubmit it. Please see the posts above. 331dot (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ganga Narayan Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ganga Narayan Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. The citations you have are brief notices of ceremonies honouring him, and do not support thed etailed contents of the article. When you do resubmit with added references, focus he article on him, not on the general background, and try for a WP:NPOV. [WP:V|verifiability]] is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 17:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ganga Narayan Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ganga Narayan Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhumij revolt moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bhumij revolt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Firkal

Hello, Kingsman3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Firkal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ganga Narayan Singh

Hello, Kingsman3

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Skarmory, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ganga Narayan Singh, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Skarmory}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarhul moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sarhul, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kingsman3, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ganga Narayan Singh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, if you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. I'm very willing to help, and it looks like you don't really understand the process – I am willing to help in any way I can, but these articles you have written aren't in good enough shape to be articles as of now. Providing reliable sources (see also the verifiability policy) is the number one thing to do, and if you can do that, a lot of other things will stop being as problematic. If you can't figure it out, I'd suggest improving existing articles before jumping into article creation, which I honestly would suggest now. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello. Your recent edit to Potka block appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Potka block. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop reformatting section titles, we use sentence case e.g. "Notable people", not "Notable People" - Arjayay (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jharkhand, you may be blocked from editing. Do not add unsourced content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kingsman3! Your additions to Rani Shiromani have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not copy-paste materials from other site, namely from https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/newsdetail/index/9/9315/women-of-courage-who-challenged-the-british.

Per WP:C-P it is not allowed to copy text from other sources. Thank you! Thank you. SunDawn talk 03:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lusku Samad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lusku Samad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 03:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lusku Samad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lusku Samad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lusku Samad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CUPIDICAE💕 03:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jagannath Singh (Revolutionary) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jagannath Singh (Revolutionary), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 03:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion. Kingsman3 (talk) 03:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shyam Ganjam Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shyam Ganjam Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 13:50, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subal Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Subal Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 13:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jagannath Singh (Revolutionary) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jagannath Singh (Revolutionary), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kingsman3, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kingsman3 (talk) 01:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Languages with official status in India, you may be blocked from editing. DO not add unsourced content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Kingsman3 (talk) 03:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. Remember to accompany new content addition with reliable sources. You can visit WP:RSP and WP:RSN as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. last warning, don't post copyright material Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Durga Bhumij

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Durga Bhumij requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.sentinelassam.com/assam-election-2021/candidates/phase1/durga-bhumij-from-doom-dooma-early-life-controversy-political-career-529229. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ganga Narayan Singh

Hello, Kingsman3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ganga Narayan Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhumij revolt (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bhumij rebellion instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhumij revolt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bhumij revolt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kingsman3 (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rankini Temple, Jadugora moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rankini Temple, Jadugora, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kingsman3 (talk) 08:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Rankini Temple, Jadugora

Hello, Kingsman3,

Thank you for creating Rankini Temple, Jadugora.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Television news is not an acceptable reference. This article needs categories and more sources. What is needful is individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.
Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.

Be completely independent of the article subject.

Meet the standard for being a reliable source.

Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: ThanksKingsman3 (talk) 13:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have completed a copy-edit and clean-up of the article. There is a language issue around use of incarnate and incarnation, which I have changed in the article. It will make sense to readers. The references are apt. I have a suggestion for you, you should give one citation (or source) for the Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay quotation. The article is now marked as reviewed. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Madhu Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raja Madhu Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shyam Ganjam Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shyam Ganjam Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shaheed Jagannath Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shaheed Jagannath Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subal Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Subal Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dubraj Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dubraj Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Madhu Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raja Madhu Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ganga Narayan Singh

Hello, Kingsman3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ganga Narayan Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Your edit to Chuar rebellion has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Even if you have not originally created the page, you have restored the policy-violating content after it was removed by User:Dark-World25 as a blatant copyright violation. As such, the copyright violation is now in your responsibility. You been warned before about copyright violations twice. Austronesier (talk) 08:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Austronesier There is no copyright material in the article Kingsman3 (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because it has been removed. Before (including in the version you restored at 02:03, 24 May 2022), it was full of verbatim quotes ripped from Sarkar's paper "Chuar Revolt in South West Bengal: A Historical Analysis". And your latest version still violates WP:Close paraphrasing. –Austronesier (talk) 20:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: I can't espace the impression that this user isn't really aware of the graveness of copyright issues. –Austronesier (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Durjan Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Durjan Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dark-World25 (talk) 12:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jogeswar Bhumij

Hi. Please stop adding a category to this article that is not verified in the article text, per WP:CATVER. Please also see WP:EGRS too. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Jagannath Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raja Jagannath Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Owlf 📪 13:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chuar Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Kingsman3 (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mahendra Nath Sardar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mahendra Nath Sardar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 19:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meghlal Mahato

The article Meghlal Mahato has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 00:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, Meghlal Mahato is the first man from Jharkhand to summit the Mount Everest in 2012. Earlier, he also summited Mt. Stok Kangri and Mt. Saser Kangri.Kingsman3 (talk) 02:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meghlal Mahato for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meghlal Mahato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghlal Mahato until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ComplexRational (talk) 17:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @ComplexRational, Meghlal Mahato is an Indian mountaineer, who summited Mount Everest, the world's highest mountain peak in 2012.Kingsman3 (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ganga Narayan Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ganga Narayan Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 10:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had to move this to draft. It is completely unsourced and what sources are there are very poor. This needs academic sourcing. Once is sourced correctly, please give me a shout and I will mainspace it. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 10:11, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ganga Narayan Singh

Hello, Kingsman3

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Ganga Narayan Singh, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ganga Narayan Singh

Hello, Kingsman3, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ganga Narayan Singh, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganga Narayan Singh.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:44, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren:, Respected sir, I would like to tell you that Ganga Narayan Singh was a great leader of Bhumij rebellion, during 1832-33. He was the first leader to unite the tribals to fought against the British. He bravely fought against the British East India Company against their exploitative land laws, salt laws, etc. He was killed by a British broker during a fight against the British at Kharsawan in 1833. Thank you Kingsman3 (talk) 03:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt that this is true, but you must include secondary sources that can be verified (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). I was going to send the article to draft and found that the article already exists there (see Draft:Ganga Narayan Singh. The draft article looks to be sourced and in reasonable shape. Wait for other editors to accept the draft. By creating new articles you are just creating extra work for everyone else. Be patient and allow the process to be completed. There is no hurry. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 03:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ganga Narayan Singh

Hi @Kingsman3: I sent your article to draft because it was largely unsourced. There was whole sections of it which was missing references. You have created another article without working on the draft article which is bit diruptive. A redirect will be put from this article to the draft. The process is, you work on the draft, once its completed, then you submit it for review and if its well sourced then it gets back to mainspace. You cannot post unsourced content to mainspace. The type of references your using for this historical are very poor. They need to be academic sources if possible. Not clickbait sites. scope_creep^Talk 07:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsman3: This article or version of it seems to been in the draft several times and its landed in mainspace several times and its been draft. It currently doesn't look your here to build an encyclopedia by following the processes. If it happens that another gets article gets created or the redirect gets removed, then I intend to take you up admin noticeboard. They will deal with you. scope_creep^Talk 07:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of PhysicsWallah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on PhysicsWallah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physics Wallah. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sourav Joshi (YouTuber) (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Vlog sites and Wordpress sites are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sourav Joshi (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Moje Riba

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Moje Riba has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://amritmahotsav.nic.in/unsung-heroes-detail.htm?51, https://www.sentinelassam.com/junior-sentinel/moje-riba/, and https://thedawnlitpost.com/2021/08/untold-story-of-freedom-fighter-moji-riba/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy material from elsewhere online

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moje Riba

Please do not closely paraphrase from sources, as this is still considered a copyright violation. You copied much of this source word-for-word, even copying some of the grammar mistakes ("the India" and "on 1982"). Please go through this article and rewrite it in your own words, or it may be deleted. Thank you. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:31, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks Kingsman3 (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physics Wallah (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Physics Wallah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tanuj Mahashabde

Hello, Kingsman3

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ts12rAc, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Tanuj Mahashabde, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ts12rAc}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 18:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanuj Mahashabde

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tanuj Mahashabde requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanuj Mahashabde (3rd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sumbul Touqeer Khan (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sumbul Touqeer Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 12:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kingsman3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never add copyrighted material to Wikipedia and will not violate Wikipedia's copyright policy in the future Kingsman3 (talk) 12:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a good start, but as copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we must be convinced that you understand this issue. Please tell in your own words (WP:COPYVIO may help) what copyright is, what Wikipedia's license is, and when and how copyrighted content can be used on Wikipedia. We need to know this in order to trust that you will indeed not post copyright violations. 331dot (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kingsman3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never copy any material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not in public domain, and I will always follow the copyright policy in the future. Kingsman3 (talk) 04:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You forgot to answer 331dot's questions, above. Yamla (talk) 21:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Jagannath Singh (Revolutionary)

Hello, Kingsman3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jagannath Singh (Revolutionary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jagannath Singh (Revolutionary) 2

Hello, Kingsman3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jagannath Singh (Revolutionary) 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baidyanath Singh

The article Baidyanath Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article entirely fails verification; there is no person referred to in the sole cited source who has the name of the article subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 16:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jirpa Laya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jirpa Laya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:34, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhumij revolt

Hello, Kingsman3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhumij revolt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mahendra Nath Sardar

Hello, Kingsman3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mahendra Nath Sardar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingsman3. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Baidyanath Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Baidyanath Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mahendra Nath Sardar

Hello, Kingsman3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mahendra Nath Sardar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jirpa Laya

Hello, Kingsman3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jirpa Laya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Baidyanath Singh

Hello, Kingsman3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Baidyanath Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]