User talk:Kbabej/Archive 3

Bruce Schroeder

If you observe, virtually the same sentence as what you wrote in this diff in the Bruce_Schroeder#Judicial_career section where it says "Schroeder came to national attention in 2021 while presiding over the Kyle Rittenhouse trial". I would also advise of WP:BRD. When and edit has been reverted, the generally accepted action isn't to re-revert and engage in discussion via edit summaries. Please see WP:BRD. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: It's stunningly obvious the judge only became notable because of the trial. His article didn't even exist until a few days ago. To not mention it in the lead goes against all common sense. I would encourage you to review WP:COMMON. If you believe the sentence duplication isn't ideal, then edit the sentence. --Kbabej (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Sure. Then pick one. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bobbi Kristina Brown

The article Bobbi Kristina Brown you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bobbi Kristina Brown for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 21:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bobbi Kristina Brown

Hello! Your submission of Bobbi Kristina Brown at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Therapyisgood (talk) 16:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas Kbabej!

Ganesha811 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Sealand

Please stop pushing an agenda about Sealand. Whatever you or I might think about it, the FACTS are that this is NOT a sovereign country or even a partially recognised one. It's the project of one family. Simply calling yourself royalty does not make it true. Also, your comment that Michael Bates is not a self-proclaimed prince is inaccurate. His father was not in a position to bestow a royal title, so even if he did 'declare' his son the Prince of Sealand, it's meaningless. Michael Bates is still trying to claim the title as legitimate, therefore he is self-proclaimed. 2A00:23C7:8905:CC01:791F:C50E:DD44:B86 (talk) 11:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

GOCE review of Comedian (artwork)

@Tdslk: Thank you! Much appreciated. Hope you are having a good holiday season. --Kbabej (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Bobbi Kristina Brown

On 5 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bobbi Kristina Brown, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bobbi Kristina Brown died less than four years after her mother Whitney Houston died in similar circumstances? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bobbi Kristina Brown. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bobbi Kristina Brown), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,385.5 views (1,032.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 08:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: Oh, that's very cool! Thanks for the update. --Kbabej (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Congrats! Great work on the GA and the DYK nomination. Bruxton (talk) 20:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Bruxton: Thanks! And thank you for the review and help. It was my first DYK nom (and third non-joint GA) and it was great to see it come to fruition. Hope you're well! --Kbabej (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Comedian (artwork)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Comedian (artwork) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

@GhostRiver: thank you! Very much appreciated. I am willing to make any needed changes to get this to GA status. --Kbabej (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Comedian (artwork)

The article Comedian (artwork) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Comedian (artwork) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Comedian (artwork)

The article Comedian (artwork) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Comedian (artwork) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 00:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop reverting cited edits in the "Sealand" page.

I am unsure of why you hold such strong views on Sealand and Michael Bates, that you are trying to, falsely, portray that it is a legitimate nation state or that Michael Bates has any legitimate royal titles, but Sealand is wholly unrecognized by every sovereign state. It is unrecognized, and by the way, "micronation" does not automatically mean unrecognized. Take Andorra, an internationally recognized state in Iberia, which is referred to as a micronation not because of its recognition but because of its geographic size. I do not want this situation to devolve into edit warring so I kindly ask you to stop doing this. I am apparently not the first to try to address this, by the way. Chastizement (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Comedian (artwork)

On 28 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Comedian (artwork), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the artwork Comedian, a fresh banana taped to a wall with duct tape, sold for $120,000 in 2019? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Comedian (artwork). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Comedian (artwork)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Jacqueline Jackson

@Kbabej: I am copyediting Jacqueline Jackson (a fascinating woman) and have a question. Is the Peace & Justice Award from Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/Push Coalition? There's a paywall on the citation. Thanks. Cleveland Todd (talk) 20:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Cleveland Todd: Hello! Thank you for taking this on. Much appreciated. Yes, I believe the award is from that organization. --Kbabej (talk) 20:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kbabej: Re: "Done" template. Kbabelj Yes. I put the "done" template on the article up on 2/15. Cleveland Todd (talk) 13:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Sayali Sanjiv

Hello sir, Network of these people is very big

• Amitbhb12 - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amitbhb12/Archive

• Amitbhb12 - Akshay Bardapurkar [1]
• Akshay Bardapurkar - Planet Marathi Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Marathi OTT
• Planet Marathi - Sayali Sanjiv [2] Cinzia007 (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kbabej

Thank you for creating Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @North8000! Very much appreciated! --Kbabej (talk) 21:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi Kbabej, thank you, thank you, THANK YOU for expanding and putting context to Millie Bobby Brown's personal life. S0091 (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @S0091! Much appreciated. It looks like it's been reverted by a new editor who is misapplying WP:WAW, which is actually an essay and not policy. Even if it were policy, I believe the information added is from green-level RS from WP:RSP. There's a discussion on the talk page here, but the section has been reverted and the editor has not responded to my points. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts one way or another. --Kbabej (talk) 19:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Sam Asghari

There is Draft:Sam Asghari, could you please transfer select content from that to the main article? Kailash29792 (talk) 03:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Kailash29792! Will work on this! --Kbabej (talk) 00:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

J. K. Rowling

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Just noting this was not a repeat; the article is under double sanctions (BLP and gender). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:30, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh, oops, I didn't read it that closely (obviously). I'll reinstate! Thanks! --Kbabej (talk) 00:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Moore (writer) has been accepted

Jason Moore (writer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 19:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

More than a wolf whistle

The information is extremely pertinent to the discussion on this Wikipedia topic. Everything that was stated is neutral in content and is completely sourced..the only reason to remove the information is to provide a false narrative that Mrs. Bryant is somehow to be blamed for the actions that befell emmett till when she has been found innocent in multiple investigations 2600:1003:B84C:F797:71CD:6335:DF23:898F (talk) 15:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello @2600:1003:B84C:F797:71CD:6335:DF23:898F. I agree the information is pertinent, which is why it's already been included in the page. What you've added is redundant, and formatted incorrectly. Your addition states:

Mr.Tyson received an unpublished memoir from Carolyn Bryant Donham which he made an agreement to have held for release until 2036. An agreement with Donham and historian Timothy Tyson at the University of North Carolina, An agreement that he violated stating " I decided that if there was going to be a re-investigation, that criminal justice outweighs the archival agreement," Tyson tells CNN. There was no reinvestigation "There’s no new evidence to open the case back up,” Michelle Williams, chief of staff for Attorney General Lynn Fitch, told The Associated Press.

That's already all covered. The agreement and the 2036 planned release date are already in the lead. The fact Tyson released the book is in the lead, and the fact it was held at UNC and that Tyson violated the agreement is in the 'Background' section. As is his quote. Nothing you've added isn't ready in the article. Were you meaning to add other information? --Kbabej (talk) 15:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Generation Drag

On 20 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Generation Drag, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that model Tyra Banks produces Generation Drag, a TV series which follows five children preparing for a drag show? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Generation Drag. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Generation Drag), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

More than a wolf whistle 2

find it amusing how you choose to hide any negativity about this man deep inside the wiki pages and only present the accomplishments he has attained in his introduction. How can you feel that his lying to carolyn bryant donham about sealing her memoir until 2036 with UNC and then turning around and releasing it to the media just because HE DECIDED ON HIS ON that it had some sort of revelation in it that would make the world find her guilty ? This man has lied in order to sell his book by saying that Ms Donham recanted her story but had no proof to prove it..and now he has lied in order to obtain her memoir...I believe any analytical person would feel that these examples are worthy of total and complete front page coverage! But Wikipedia as well as Twitter ,Facebook and many other liberal controlled sites choose to censor and distort the information into a narrative that fits the policies they want to push. Ms.Donham is a white woman and she was whistled at by a Black individual in the Jim Crow south..this is a PROVEN fact. Emmett Till was horribly murdered and ATLEAST TWO of the white men that did it got off free in an unjust trail...also the truth. But to vilify Ms. Donham in order to profit and to say that she must pay just because she is white is unjust as well. 2600:1003:B84A:6ABE:B4DD:CE6:CC7:7163 (talk) 11:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I'm not sure what you're asking for here. The book's article, I Am More Than a Wolf Whistle, covers the fact that the historian leaked the book early in the lead, and in the article body as well under 'Background', along with his reasoning for leaking it. When you say "he has lied", I haven't seen any reliable sources state that. If you have any, please let me know and I can incorporate them. When you say WP has "chose[n] to censor and distort the information into a narrative that fits the polies they want to push", I'm also not sure what you're referring to. The book, the leak, and the reception are covered as thoroughly as possible. Again, if you have any reliable sources that would change the facts, please let me know. Cheers! --Kbabej (talk) 15:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Wolf Whistle 3

If you would bother to read the link that I have been adding you would see what the matters at hand are. Wiki has no problem putting the statement that Ms. Donham recanted her story to Mr Tyson front and center ! But when the truth is pointed out that she DID NOT recant her story then you want to hide that and say it's not part of the big picture. Personally I feel the idea that you can allow a man such as Mr.Tyson to state that she lied and he has proof...when the only "proof " that he has is his own hand written notes because he " forgot to record that part of the interview " is really the big picture! Since when have we taken the word of one person as the truth and another person's as a lie just because we like the narrative that it leads us to ? The article that is linked is even titled Donham lied...did Tyson lie to ? Who are any of us to question that what Ms.Donham said was not the truth ?..we were not there and we most likely will never know...but just because Mr Tyson scribbled " she lied ..that parts not true " doesn't make his statement the truth. 2600:1003:B859:DA73:98A0:695A:7B88:4301 (talk) 13:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

IP range blocked for 3 days for multiple blp violations. Let me know if they return. Doug Weller talk 13:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks @Doug Weller, will do! --Kbabej (talk) 15:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Sexual Heretics

A belated thank you for finding sources for the Sexual Heretics article during the deletion discussion for that article. I have added some content in it from the sources you gave - I would appreciate it if you could go through and give it a copy edit, mostly to make sure what I put (a) makes sense and (b) follows the sources. (I also haven't deleted the sources which were in the article originally, which you suggested). QueenofBithynia (talk) 14:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @QueenofBithynia! No problem on the AfD; glad it was kept! I'll head over to the article now for a ce. --Kbabej (talk) Kbabej (talk) 16:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, much appreciated! QueenofBithynia (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Letting you know I submitted an SPI investigation against you

I submitted an SPI investigation concerning you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kbabej.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Other articles for deletion

Can you please nominate the following articles for deletion?

Negligible sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oregon_College_of_Arts_and_Sciences

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oregon_College_of_Education

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H._Lundquist_College_of_Business

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UO_Computer_and_Information_Science_Department

Limited sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oregon_School_of_Law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Oregon_College_of_Design 24.85.234.209 (talk) 00:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Alcoa Care-free Homes

Alcoa Care-free Homes has been created. A redirect/merge of Alcoa House (Portland, Oregon) would be appropriate id the article actually existed. Would you mind taking a look and adding what you can? Thanks.Djflem (talk) 10:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Kbabej. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Howard brennan

I wasn't trying to be difficult on the Howard Brennan page....just not use to seeing people referred to as memoirists here. (At the risk of bringing up OTHERSTUFF).Rja13ww33 (talk) 18:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Rja13ww33! Thanks for reaching out. I was going off what someone else had entered in the short description ("writer"), so I assumed that was accurate going off that and the last sentence (mentioning the memoir). But when I Gsearch it, there's nothing describing him that way. Hmm. So you are likely right - perhaps my edit was SYNTH? Regardless, to call him a memoirist wouldn't be quite accurate then, since as you pointed out it was released posthumously (and therefore he never earned any money off it, unless he got some sort of advance). So, long story short, I support you removing it. Thanks for your patience with me! --Kbabej (talk) 18:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review

In 2019 you participated in a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastique Tiara, which resulted in a consensus to redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11). I have now taken the article to deletion review, at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 September 28#Plastique Tiara. I am informing everyone who participated in the deletion discussion, except two indef-blocked accounts and an IP address which last edited two years ago, in case they would like to contribute to the deletion review. JBW (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Julie Powell

On 2 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Julie Powell, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 01:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't think you have adequately addressed the COIN concerns. Springee (talk) 02:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Notice of ANI discussion

Based on your replies to the COIN discussion I've opened an ANI discussion related to your COI editing. Springee (talk) 18:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Konrad Juengling

The article Konrad Juengling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The notability of the subject is questionable. Article was created by the subject. Most mentions appear to be minor and little notability beyond a single action related to grabbing domain addresses

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Konrad Juengling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Konrad Juengling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konrad Juengling (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravenswing 11:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)