This is an archive of past discussions about User:John B123. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I don't understand what is the problem with disability flag article. The references are in Spanish because the Flag was created in Spain. I'm Spanish and Spanish native speaker and I am sure about the veracity of the information and references. Didn't explain a reason for your decision and I would like to know a reason for you.
Sincerely, Navi NaviNews (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Well. I will delete the information that don't exist the references directly. But. The last sentences was published because I am making a claim that is interpreted as self-evident or without a crucial need to provide a reference. it is really very difficult to offer content solely and exclusively through referrals. but I will look for more references. keep in mind that it is something recent and I have clarified that I was going to make more modifications. You haven't given me much time ~ regards NaviNews (talk) 23:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
re Jean-Jacques_Kupiec
thank you for your attention to my Kupiec page,
I am working on it,
for your general awareness .... Jean Jacques Kupiec is a very well know, highly respected French academic who gives many keynote talks at international conferences.
It is puzzling that no one to date (except me) has created an English Entry.
For reference here is the French Wikipedia page entry for him ..
you will find on Google Scholar that there 331 pages with 10 references per page, i.e 3310 references discussing his work,
so I was hoping other folks would start discovering him by placing a stub and allowing others to work on it, (kind of difficult if it's just a personal draft space for me).
In any case thank you for you advice. I will be continuing to work on it. If you do find that an elite scientist with this background is actually notable, it would be nice if you could move it back to a stub article where more people can work on it. Thanks
Emoritz2017 (talk) 01:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I created a page for Aisja Hakimsan. If i understood correctly, you created the note of needing to add more reliable sources. What sources could these be? The information is mostly from a book that was written by people who knew him very well.
Hi Muokkaus55, large parts of the "Life" section are unreferenced. As a minimum, each paragraph should be referenced. It's perfectly acceptable to use the same references over again if they are applicable to that paragraph. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, thank you for letting me know. Apprently i’m still fairly knew to this. I added the references now, hope it’s correct this time. -M. Muokkaus55 (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Without your support and guidance,I would not have been able to create more than 50 articles. Now I have got the autopatrolled rights and you are the first person that I am always grateful to. You are one among the amazing wikipedians with super natural speed I have ever seen. Thank you for acting like my mentor and reviewing most of my articles. I wish your furthermore support for me to grow here as a better wikipedian and help this community. Regards Kichu🐘 Discuss18:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:John B123 I created a page for Marlot Meddens If i understood correctly, The source I added is violating the copyright. you left the note I reviewed the sources again I created the article without copyright infringement thank you. (User talk:Vecihi91) 21:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi John B123. Thank your for reviewing my articles. Could I ask for your input on a discussion on the Birkenhead Built-up area. An contributed user is concerned about the confusion and if all the articles I made are necessary. They seem concerned by just that article. Could you please take a moment to comment on the talk page and see what you think. Cheers RailwayJG (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Not an improvement what? they are not sex worker that why i remove it (violation of policies or guidelines) · As discussed in the deletion request, "BLP violation - calling identifiable people prostitutes with no substantiation". or because of my grammar? Lalalulilalia (talk) 17:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
@John B123: also can you take a look at this page Child prostitution in ThailandWhen the Asian financial crisis began in 1997, it made Thai currency (also known as the "Baht") lose significant value, making Thailand an even cheaper destination for sex tourists and, therefore, one of the most-visited countries of South East Asia.[8] The Thailand government spent millions of baht to promote sexual tourism in Thailand,[9] claiming thing like this with bad source atleast find better source when i click on the source it downloading file Lalalulilalia (talk) 17:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
@Lalalulilalia: Most of those articles don't have a lead image so I assume somebody has added the map to add graphics to the page. Most of the Asian Prostitution in ... articles don't have the map. As I said before, the rest of Asia is irrelevant to the article. --John B123 (talk) 18:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear John B123, a page I know is being repeatedly vandalised by the same IP address.
On the U.S. Army Esports wiki,[1] five editors (including myself) are having to repeatedly undo vandalism by the same I.P.
Is there something either you or I can do to stop this address from editing on wikipedia? I only ask because I'm very inexperienced with this scenario. BulgeUwU (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
JohnB123, I understand where you are coming from with the page discussion. The problem is that we came across the article and noticed the discussion was mostly (but not entirely) baseless and didn't garner much response. I didn't reopen the article out of no where, I opened a deletion revision section here: [2]. The page's deletion discussion also saw less responses than the deletion revision (which saw an anonymous restoration vote). While I understand all opinions matter including yours (if you feel article should be deleted), you may feel free to object the restoration decision and provide your feedback on the page.
Hi John. Got another article today. Submitting for your review.
If you could also help move it to replace the redirect page, that would be great. Imcdc (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi onel5969 thanks for the heads up. I disagree with the comments left on your talk page. The Taxon identifiers confirm the plants exist and being respected sources, show notability is met. They may or may not verify any other information in the article. To me this is no different to an article having a list of references at the end rather than inline citations. Following the same logic, we could delete all 857 references from Donald Trump as it has multiple sources in the authority control.
nobody will ever improve these stubs because of a tag - that could be said about a lot of the tags we add as part of NPP. I don't see why we should treat plant articles any differently to other articles. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 00:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
John B123, I agree that this is no different than an article having a list of refs without footnotes, but that doesn't negate the fact that they are indeed refs. If the editor had created footnotes for the refs in taxon bar, it would include at least 6 other reliable sources, so therefore the single ref tag doesn't apply. Neither does the more refs tag apply, since everything in the article is referenced. I don't think notability can be invoked either, due to the gazetteer aspect of WP. That being said, these are some of the most aggravating stubs I come across, and have constant issues. I just don't think one-source is one of them. But as always, thanks for everything you do on WP, especially at NPP, don't know what we'd do without you. Onel5969TT me04:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi onel5969, whilst I don't totally agree, for consistency I won't tag the articles if they have a taxon bar. Another thing I have found annoying lately is a couple of editors creating very short stubs with {{expand language}} tags. As written, the stubs don't meet notability requirements, but when you look at the full foreign language articles there is no doubt about notability. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Agreed, items listed in the taxonbar are not considered direct references / sources on Wikipedia articles. Abductive has been mistaken about this in the past. Removing the one source template is incorrect. —Hyperik⌜talk⌟14:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hyperik, do you have a link to a discussion regarding that outcome? I'm not trying to defend Abductive in any sense, but just using logic: if you go to any article which has a hyperlink to a source, and you click on the link, it brings up that source. Similarly, if you click on the link in the taxonbar, it brings up the source. Now, that would classify it as a source, but not necessarily a reference? The tag is for a single source, which is different than the "more references" tag. I don't think the more references tag would be appropriate either, since all the info in the article is verifiable through the single references. I don't know if this is worrisome enough to open a formal RfC, but it would be nice if NPP reviewers were consistent in the application. Thoughts? Onel5969TT me16:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
There's a short discussion here. Also, an article can have multiple references that come from the same source. Plants of the World Online is pretty good, but I send them emails of errata pretty regularly, so encouraging more than one source is a good idea. (That said, I'd rather none of these one-sentence plant stubs exist at all; see my recent Talk archives.) —Hyperik⌜talk⌟17:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, John B123! How to move a page Ivan Solomonovich Beritashvili to ivane beritashvili ? The page could not be moved... In fact, correct name is Ivane Beritashvili. - OTOGIMessages18:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Requesting you to visit User talk:Bookku#Black Sea climate and ecology where the question of copyright has been already discussed between another user Mccapra & me. Pl. let we know if you have any different or additional point than which were discussed between Mccapra and me and if you are not satisfied.
Dear John, thank you so much for your help and the work you do here on Wikipedia. I was wondering whether the Mala Scena Theater has enough references now and is ready to have the tag removed? Also, I have many unreviewed articles and I know you have a lot of work to do, but could you review the articles: Sisterella, Luka Juričić (actor) and Lisa Hunt? I had to make a lot of research and work for those (to prove notability). Thanks.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 10:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Footwiks, I've moved the article back to mainspace as you have added content and references. Normally drafts don't get reviewed until you press the "Submit for review" button. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 12:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Baratiiman, I don't have the necessary permissions to see the data for investigating sockpuppets. You can post your concerns at WP:SPI where those more able to investigate will look into it. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Donnchad mac Cellaig
Hi John B,
The page on Donnchad mac Cellaig should not be deleted because the text which it uses is over 100 years old and is in the Public Domain. While it contains a chunk of text from a book, that book is 'History and Antiquities of the Diocese of Ossory, Vol. 1' published in 1905 by William Carrigan.
Please do not delete it, as there is no copyright violation.
I noticed you had earlier added the the template "Need additional citations" for the page Muso Kunda Museum of Women, Mali.
I have since added many references. If you find my improvements meet your peer review of reference adequacy, please consider removing the template "Need additional citations". Malian news sources are also limited given the instability. Thanks for dropping by the article! Best Arunram (talk) 14:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Don't know if you delved back to this fuller version before the templating. I ran the tool (probably a few years back, might be on the old computer) which concluded no copyvio, but didn't get around to dealing with it; now the source is log-in only. Written by a P&C employee who left in 1974! rgds --Rocknrollmancer (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Rocknrollmancer. The full text of the Telegraph Obituary is archived at archive.today.[3]. Running Earwigs Copyvio on the version of the page you linked to and the archived Telegraph article[4] shows minimal copyvio. I don't see why the deleted content can't be reinstated, possibly with some slight changes of wording. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Muchas, didn't think to check archive (normally I look at Wayback) as I was watching MotoGP qualifying at the time (well, the smaller classes, casually) then closed the laptop for the big bruisers! Interesting to see them trying (and mostly failing) to compress the front suspension for launch control setting. Then been shopping - oh, excitement. Luckily for us the Pickrell permalink is there - I made a mistake in not paraphrasing some prose when rough-drafting a bio recently and inadvertently uploaded it. The admin expunged it all from view but I have the draft saved to a cloud so I know what's not there in the WP version - must get around to rectifying it.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I normally look at Wayback too, but there wasn't a full copy. Not only have we got MotoGP this weekend but F1 as well. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Gail Davey
Many thanks for reviewing the page so fast. Grateful as ever. I do not understand how to get an authority control working. How does a dummy edit activate it? --MerielGJones (talk) 23:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi MerielGJones, {{authority control}} draws its data from Wikidata. For this to happen there needs to be identifiers on the wikidata page and the Wikidata page has to be linked to the WP article. Gail Davey wasn't previously linked to on Wikidata, so I added the link.[5] The reciprocal link on the WP article is only made when the page is saved, hence the dummy edit. ie you need to add the link on wikidata before adding {{authority control}} to the page. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks John B123! Very useful clear explanation. I had thought the process with Wikidata was automatic (or have mostly encountered people who are already there).--MerielGJones (talk) 09:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
@MerielGJones: I think the process is automated to a degree but it would be difficult to have it fully automated, for example when there are multiple people with the same name. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
A page I edited and you reviewed and approved was moved to draft by GSS
Hi John,
I edited the page of Gia Merlo and you reviewed it and approved it. GSS later moved it to draft claiming that I am receiving compensation for my edits and am therefore in violation of Wikipedia policy. Please note that I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. I also told the same to GSS but he refuses to move the page back to main. Is there anything you can do? I am just helping out here. I do wikipedia edits only occasionally and most definitely not for money. I would appreciate your help. RespectfullyInterfever (talk) 12:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
@Interfever: It's better if you follow the Wikipedia policies on paid editing rather than asking users to help you. As I said on my talk page there is pretty clear evidence that you were hired and I have shared the details with the concerned. GSS💬13:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
I have no idea which evidence you are talking about. I did not receive any money for my edits. It is absurd that you ask me to disclose something that is simply not true! Dr. Gia Merlo is as deserving of having a Wikipedia article about her work as any other physician and author currently listed on Wikipedia. Respectfully
Hi Imcdc, the list needs more references. Generally with lists, each item needs a reference unless it is a link to a WP page. Regards --John B123 (talk) 18:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I'm TheTechnician27. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Allan Day, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hi John. Thank you so much for your review and post on the Albany Rollers article. In regards to the linkrot, I've found the reFill tool (https://refill.toolforge.org/ng/) is currently not operating and has been without repair about a week. It seems that it us unsupported. I have tried User:Citation bot as well without success. I've also tried the others on the list, without success. Are there any acceptable reference tools that are working that you know of? With reFill down, I know there is a back log of articles needing attention beyond my own, with other contributors seeking assistance as well. Thanks for your work on wikipedia.Skilgis1900 (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Skilgis1900, none of tools that fill bare refs on a page are working at the moment. Citation bot is for tidying up existing citations rather than creating them. I've filled most of the references in on the article with RefToolbar. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank You John. I greatly appreciate the update on the bare references situation and your efforts! I hope the situation improves, it is quite essential for the growth of wikipedia articles. Thanks again for all your good work on wikipedia!!Skilgis1900 (talk) 22:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi John. Positive update. reFill has been repaired and is back to working normally. Good news. I'll now work to catch up on the pages I've worked on in the time it was down.Skilgis1900 (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
For subjects on which I have limited or no knowledge, i.e. nuclear fission, I find it more helpful just to leave a question on the article's Talk page rather than stick in a Notability tag. Or, in the case of articles relative to "Thoroughbred racing" you could go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Horse racing and post your concerns where it will gladly be dealt with by people with the knowledge and experience to determine its status on Wikipedia. Thanks. Stretchrunner (talk) 15:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi John. I am just writing to ask you for some help. I recently created the article for All Saints Church in Gainsborough. However the infobox seems to have gone wrong and it's all over the place. I've tried fixing it on my sandbox but it is the same. Could you or someone look at it please and fix it. I've already provided links for it and the information used. Thank you and be appreciated. RailwayJG (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi RailwayJG, I see it has been fixed now and the problem was a missing bracket. [7] For your future reference, missing brackets are the usual cause of an infobox displaying as text not an infobox. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
@John B123: Hi sir this morning I have created 2021 Bangladesh Independence Cup. So I made a mistake. Please help me to edit it?Can you see on top is written 2021Independence Cup? I need a space between 2021 and I. Thanks sir. Tanvir Kabir Saikat (talk) 11:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing the articles I created. M9 Detector Tape was the first article I ever created, but I just places that into my third article, Chemical Agent Detector Paper. The JSLIST is my second article I ever created. I was worried that no one would accept it on review. Thank you. Prairie AstronomerTalk18:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Now I need to get to 500 main space edits so I can help with the new article backlog.
Hi Run n Fly, well done on creating your first article. I think you've done enough to show notability so have marked the article as reviewed. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you added a tag on some of the California wildfire articles I started with add more citation. All of the information on those articles came from the citation under the Reference section. Do I add that citation inline with the paragraph? Prairie AstronomerTalk14:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Granted, on the Mad River Complex Fire, I took that information off of the table on 2015 California Wildfires because of how InciWeb works. InciWeb only shows current fire data, not past fire data. If I can find another source for the other ones, I will add those though. Prairie AstronomerTalk15:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Imcdc, a bit of a difficult one regarding notability. From WP:BANDMEMBERMembers of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability. Colbert doesn't really have any notability outside the bands, but being a significant member of Ride and The Jesus and Mary Chain, redirecting to either wouldn't tell the full story. (Ignoring The Animalhouse as it doesn't have its own article). I've marked the article as reviewed for the reasons above, but as the notability is marginal, somebody else may take a different view at a later date. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
List of synagogues in Poland - moved to draft space
Hi @John B123, I see you moved this list to draft space and I assume that was done because it does not give sources. It seems that you did not bother about what I said on the article's talk page (or even read it) why I think it is not necessary in this list of this type to reference each entry.
I looked at some list-articles and many others do not give sources for their entries. Furthermore I saw that some contained the greatest rubbish and no reviewer seemed to bother (e.g. List of active synagogues in Poland contained a synagogue that was destroyed in Kristallnacht (and this fact was even stated in the text!)). Or List of oldest synagogues contains for Ukraine just two entries, and one is for the 19th century. A quick check at List of synagogues in Ukraine will show you that there are synagogues from the 16th century.
But I acknowledge that it is easier just to say: "no sources - will be deleted" than actually check the contents.
Hi Wanfried-Dublin. Wikipedia standards have evolved over the years, so yes there are older articles that aren't compliant with the current guidelines and policy. However that is not an argument for new articles not complying any more than speeding being allowable because other drivers do.
Policy is that items in lists should be referenced unless the list item has its own page, in which case the individual item's article provides verification. Without references people could add incorect information, or even in the case of lists of people, malicious entries. Whilst you may not agree with this, it's policy that has been evolved by the community. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi John B123. Does that mean if I delete all "red" entries in the list, that it is compliant with Wikipedia guidelines? Then this list should be renamed "List of synagogues in Poland with articles in the English Wikipedia". I have no intention doing this, and anyhow I think my days creating anything in the English Wikipedia are over. --Wanfried-Dublin (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
References improved for Sheung Shui Government Secondary School page
Dear John B123,
I had added more references to secondary sources like South China Morning Post as per your suggestion (notability tag). Please check and suggest. Aravindhan Ravikumar (talk) 23:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
References improved for Sham Shui Po Park Swimming Pool and Shau Kei Wan East Government Secondary School pages
Dear John B123,
I had added more references to secondary sources like Ming Pao, Oriental Daily News and South China Morning Post as per your suggestion (notability tag). Please check and suggest. Aravindhan Ravikumar (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello dear John. Glad to talk to yoi again. Its been quite long since we have talked. Im glad to inform that Im currently on trial run as NPP reviewer. I have a doubt to ask you. After I add any maintanence template on some unpatrolled articles, it later showed that I had marked the article as reviewed. But I just added a template. So late I had to mark it as unreviewed. Im afraid that whether I had marked any articles as reviewed unknowingly this way. Can you give me a clarification. Regards Kichu🐘 Need any help?19:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Kichu, hope all is well with you. With the page curation tool, when you add templates to a page it will also mark them as reviewed unless you uncheck the "Mark this page as reviewed" box just above the "Add selected tags" button. I wouldn't worry too much about it, I've done the same thing myself at times. If you want to check this hasn't happened on any other pages, a list of the pages you have curated is here. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you John. I have one more question. I hope you know that I use android device, so I mostly use mobile version. I only turn on desktop mode when it is is a must need. o on mobile version, a link displaying mark this as page as patrolled is showing on certain userpages and talkpages. Does this mean that we need to mark userpages and talk pages as reviewed? I thought this patrolling was only needed for articles. Kichu🐘 Need any help?19:43, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Could you please change the name of the article Mora,Ethiopia to the kingdom of Mora since it’s not a location. Rashicy (talk) 22:47, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi John, please would you explain on what grounds you deleted that page and redirected it to the Kabi Kabi page?
Except for that I am new to Wiki? See, from my point of view, a well sourced and written informative page should firstly be allowed on Wiki. If its violating any policies it should be discussed. We have a lively discussion on the Gubbi Gubbi page about it, and at least over this time that page should be allowed to be online. Really hard ti understand the actions off experienced editors here, and its really discouraging. The author of the page gave up on it, and I offered help Wikigetsme123 (talk) 08:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Wikigetsme123. Where there is disputed content the procedure is that once the content has been removed it should not be added again until there is consensus on the talk page. Without this procedure we end up with people keep adding and removing the content to suit their point of view. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi @John B123 yes, understand now. Its difficult for newbees to see different editors acting, and you don't know where they are from and why. But I see ignorance towards new editors, as literally everything written will be reversed right away, no matter how justified it is. That happened to me with the old Gympie Pyramid article, and my reaction came a bit out of that experience. A bit more acceptance and tolerance towards newbees would be helpful. I checked on Dianekm Talk page, and no one explained to her why her Kabi article was deleted and redirected. Now over the years she was so disappointed and even contacted Alex Lum
Vice President - Wikimedia Australia, who answered with the procedure to delete the link and reinstate the page. I read that email and did follow his advise.
Wikigetsme123 (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Wikigetsme123. Wikipedia can be daunting at first and full of rules that can seem draconian. As you get more experienced you'll see these rules are actually logical and necessary. Whilst I appreciate your comments about newbies, from the otherside, more experienced editors often don't realise that they are dealing with newbies so it's not really targeting them.
Hello, I just added a second source to Darab Dastur Peshotan Sanjana. You had tagged it as needing more references. The one I added has info for more content for the article; at the moment I won't be able to add from it, but it is accessible for interested readers. Best wishes, Jacqke (talk) 23:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey John. I wanted to ping you to see if you can look into the review of Draft:SUGAR Cosmetics. I read the talk page and I found out that you had reviewed the page when it was created by another user (I am not connected to them). I had submitted the page through my previous account Hampi0210 (I forgot the password and hence new one) and I got the feedback that the sources were not reliable - which I sort of not agree with and have asked for more clarification from the reviewer also; but your time on this will be very valuable. Mumbai0421 (talk) 11:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mumbai0421, it certainly looks better now. Forbes isn't usually considered a reliable source as the take paid commissions to write articles. The two The Economic Times refs look like vanity pieces. I'd try to find some more sources to add to what you have already got. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Request for an article
@jhon B123 hi sir
i have create a article named * Ziaul Hoque Polash* and you massaged me for deletions. sir he is an actor and also director and all info are real.he have so many notable work.maybe i forget to add all and maybe missing some thik.please i have an request to you to solve the wrong word or wrong think and cancel the deletions progress. you can search on google Ziaul Hoque polash and you will get all info.
Hello, I've created an article "Kheengz". I would love to have you go through it and review it if you can please. Kind regards Moshswacide (talk) 11:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello John hope your doing well. Lately you’ve been of great help and I really appreciate it. The Muzzafarid dynasty article was moved or either deleted by another admin which thought there is no point of having 2 seperate articles. The Admin then replaced the name Muzzafarid Empire to Muzzafarids Somalia, which I don’t approve of. The admin didn’t even discuss in the talk page. Could you please return birth articles as to what they were before they were changed. Cheers: Rashicy (talk) 05:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello @John when you get a chance I would like you to review Draft:Aaron Duncan please if no-one has looked at it as yet. I submitted it for review. I've been working to get it reviewed. Thanks In Advance. --Akim Ernest (talk) 20:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello JB123, hope you and yours are well. In the world of botany there are many names, in the world of Botanical Science, there are accepted names and non-accepted names. POWO at the moment is the most up to date with accepted names, that is why I used that source. Why not more than one source? Then we get into dating problems (this years, last years) and debates in science around what is currently accepted. The practice at Wikiprojects Plants is to use single authoritative source for such. POWO seems most up-to-date and down-to-earth. I'm afraid if you tag this list with "single source" then you are going to have to go to the majority of botanical pages and do the same for naming. Brunswicknic (talk) 13:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Brunswicknic. I'm good thanks, hope you are good too. Over the past year or so NP patrollers have had different opinions from members of Wikiprojects Plants. On one occasion the member was of the opinion that if the article has a taxon bar it should not be tagged with {{One source}}, but if it doesn't have the taxon bar it should. If List of Terminalia species didn't have a taxon bar then by his interpretation of the "thoughts of Wikiprojects Plants" it should be tagged, but by your reasoning it shouldn't. On other occasions articles created under the name given in one database have been criticized because another database classifies it differently. In more general terms, there is no WP:SNG for plants, so WP:GNG would apply, which talks of reliable sources (plural). It would be really useful for NP patrollers, who are generally not plant experts, to have some definitive guidelines from Wikiprojects Plants. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello John B123, thanks, I'm well too (I'm a resident of Melbourne, Australia, and we have managed to get Covid down to zero at present). Forgive me, there is a taxonbar on the page, since its creation. However I appreciate the difficult task of NP patrollers, making judgments all the time is an intense process. I will post a new heading, drawing attention to this issue and see what comes of it. Thanks for your work. Brunswicknic (talk) 09:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Brunswicknic. In the UK we're just coming out of our third Covid lockdown. Hopefully with a large portion of the adult population now vaccinated things will improve. Your brining this up at Wikiprojects Plants is appreciated. Another thought would be for somebody from the Project to be given NPP rights and look over the new plant articles. Not only would their subject knowledge be useful, but they may be able to resolve any problems rather than just tagging the article. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 09:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
is wrong Lalalulilalia (talk) 18:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much and best regards RV (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)