User talk:Adam080

User page Talk Articles Talk archive

Nomination of Vegan Friendly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vegan Friendly, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegan Friendly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Beauty Queen of Jerusalem (TV show)

Hello, Adam080,

Thank you for creating Beauty Queen of Jerusalem (TV show).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.
Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.

Be completely independent of the article subject.

Meet the standard for being a reliable source.

Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 20:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: I have improved the article and added more references. Sometimes I'm a bit confused about the criteria's.

For example, Shtisel has many references I think are not independent (as I understood, independent is that the article is basically not only about the subject). Tell me if I'm wrong. I just tried to compare my references and Shtisel references to see what I'm doing wrong, but didn't understand. If you can give examples of these two articles (why e.g. in Shtisel it's good) would help a lot to understand what's the problem. Thanks! Adam080 (talk) 11:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The majority the Shtisel references serve as WP:SIGCOV - significant coverage which builds notability. They are also independent, which is a critical factor in being a reliable source. Primary sources are interviews. These references for Shtisel are all reviews from external sources to the show and its production, hence admissible. With Beauty Queen of Jerusalem (TV show), you have one reference about production commencing. That's an important reference and independent, reliable source. You have three promotional articles, all independent and not connected to production, nor the film-maker, or distributor. There is a reference querying the hype, and the remainder refer to the program's debut and Netflix picking up the show. These are good, independent sources that establish notability for the article. Good work. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru Thanks! Adam080 (talk) 19:13, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TheAngelcy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TheAngelcy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TheAngelcy

Hello, Adam080. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TheAngelcy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TheAngelcy

Hello, Adam080. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TheAngelcy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Committees of the Knesset moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Committees of the Knesset, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Committees of the Knesset

Hello, Adam080. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Committees of the Knesset, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]