Jump to content

User talk:Brunswicknic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Brunswicknic's Woman of the Day

13th May in regards to 13th may, a user had removed the holidays & observances, the external links and the table of contents. I reversed these revisionsBrunswicknic (talk) 05:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Brunswicknic! Thank you for your contributions. I am Paxse and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Paxse (talk) 13:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dipterocarpus costatus, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.biotik.org/laos/species/d/dipco/dipco_en.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Dipterocarpus costatus saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! EncycloPetey (talk) 10:40, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Assang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Skippy
Plectranthus amboinicus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Javanese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yigal Naor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sisowath Monivong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign Legion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stilbocarpa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maori. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Citation for Bud Powell

[edit]

It's not a valid citation if it results in a red-link error in the References section. Note 46 requires the title and author of that article to avoid the error. If you think that piece of information is vital, then you're free to track it down. I don't because it's just a quote from someone praising someone else. That's not the kind of material I consider encyclopedic and not worth my time to dig up.
–Vmavanti (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Try a Little Tenderness, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Brunswicknic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gareeb Stephen Shalfoon

[edit]

Hi Brunswicknic - I fixed the problem with this page you were trying to deal with - someone had added text to a stub template, so it was affecting several articles but wasn't editable directly from any of them. Grutness...wha? 00:54, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plectocomia pierreana has been accepted

[edit]
Plectocomia pierreana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 04:23, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pinanga sylvestris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recently reverted edit on Austin, Texas, article

[edit]

Hello Brunswicknic,

The description you supplied in reverting my recent edit does not make sense to me, because it has nothing to do with why I placed a comma in the first place. The comma belongs there.

I placed it there in full compliance with more than one Wikipedia Manual of Style guideline. Specifically MOS:DATE, which states:

"A comma follows the year unless followed by other punctuation that replaces the comma"

and also MOS:DATECOMMA, which goes into further detail:

"Dates in month–day–year format require a comma after the day, as well as after the year, unless followed by other punctuation. In both cases, the last element is treated as parenthetical."

With all due respect, I am sure that we share the common goal of wanting to make Wikipedia a better place. It is in that spirit that I request you undo the reversion you made, restoring the comma to where it is supposed to be. :)

1980fast (talk) 20:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on botanical nomenclature technicalities

[edit]

In Calamus bousigonii, you noted some differences between how IPNI and POWO list the species and its subspecies.

Subspecies with an epithet identical to the species epithet (C. bousigonii subsp. bousigonii) are called autonyms. Autonyms are considered to have the same authority as the species, and if the authority is given it would the species (C. bousigonii Becc/ subsp. bousigonii), but authority is often omitted. Autonyms are sort of like Schrodinger's Cat; in a certain technical sense, subspecies and variety autonyms are considered to have been automatically published simultaneously with the publication of any new species. In a more practical sense, the autonym doesn't come into existence until somebody describes any other subspecies or variety.

IPNI doesn't record autonyms, but otherwise aims to include every published botanical name (presumably autonyms are excluded as their "publication" is something of a metaphysical question). IPNI does not aim to provide any opinion on whether any published name should be accepted as a taxon or regarded as a synonym. While IPNI is a very reliable source, it essentially only proves that a name exists. It usually is not worth citing IPNI in Wikipedia articles (however, when there a different spellings of the same name in the literature, IPNI a good source for the authoritative spelling).

For "Pierre ex Becc." vs. "Becc.", there's some (out of date) background at Author_citation_(botany)#Usage of the term "ex". Ex authorship has a long history in botany, but has recently been deprecated, so "Becc." is preferred. "Pierre ex Becc." indicates that Becc. was giving some credit to Pierre when Becc. described the plant. There many reasons why somebody might have wanted to give credit like this; one situation might be somebody dying, while leaving an unpublished manuscript describing a new species, with a colleague subsequently making the publication. Plantdrew (talk) 03:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bruguiera gymnorhiza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bruguiera gymnorhiza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supiori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daphniphyllum majus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calyx (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at North Bay, Ontario, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at North Bay, Ontario. See WP:POINT. John from Idegon (talk) 07:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia :arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ehretia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Otto Warburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

[edit]

Hi! Please have a look at MOS:HEADCAPS which explains it. I'm not saying that my style is the only possible style, but that edits should be correct per the WP:MOS and the normal rules of punctuation. With best wishes, DBaK (talk) 12:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace that illiterate comma. If you don't want two short sentences then we can look for another solution, but the comma is just wrong. It does not matter what you prefer, it matters what is correct and does not make the encyclopaedia look comically stupid. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 12:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered: This is an imposition of your preferred style. You are edit warring, I will report you. Brunswicknic (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For those external readers, this is over a comma in a sentence in Barleria prionitis. "I disagree with your writing style, therefore you are illiterate, I am correct" seems to be the reasoning. I'm sorry, I disinterestedly disagree with the correction, but I strongly disagree with the rationale. Communication is achieved with either version. Language is a many-varied thing. Brunswicknic (talk) 12:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am no longer interested and withdraw my remarks and my attention here and there. But please feel free to report me if you like. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 12:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pentadenia

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pentadenia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cylindrolobus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blume.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Please take care in any future steps"

[edit]

That's pretty rude. I have taken the "future step", at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Musicians#Bloating_of_infobox_with_"associated"_non-notable_acts. Drmies (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of revert

[edit]

I reverted you because there is a clear source at the end of the sentence which indicates as much. I am trying to assume good faith here that you just didn't read it. In general, we don't pepper citations after every clause in a sentence. Alternatively, this could have been a simple mistake on your part. jps (talk) 13:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Ra

[edit]

I saw your revert. What can you tell me about Sun Ra's name?
Vmavanti (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aporosa octandra

[edit]

Hi Brunswicknic, I was reviewing this page that you created. While checking for copyvio, Earwig turns up a high score of 56.4% for five sources. You might want to cut down/rephrase portions of the article which use the following sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. Just ping me once you have done that, I'll be happy to review the page. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashleyyoursmile: AYS, I'm sorry, it took a while for me to work out what you were saying. I had no idea what copyvio or earwig was. This is an article on a plant species and its varieties. I have only used the references you cite to name the plant species and varieties and synonyms and give the authority of those taxa. The only "cut down or rephrase" possible is to ignore the named varieties, their synonyms and their authorities. These are important and necessary parts of an article on a plant taxa. Please see WP:Wikiproject Plants for guidelines on plant articles. I suspect that Earwig is inappropriate for biological articles. I do thank you for your work to make WP a better place. Brunswicknic (talk) 11:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Brunswicknic, I understand what you are saying. Since copyvio constitutes a very important part of any Wikipedia content, unfortunately it is not possible to ignore this. Will it be possible to remove some names of books from the "Further reading" list? If you compare the article and the sources that I've mentioned above, the overlap is particularly huge for only this portion. If some of these books/journals in the "Further Reading" section are really not needed, you might want to remove them. Ashleyyoursmile! 11:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I do find this strange. These are authoritative databases used as the authorities on plants of the world at present. My quoting their citing of current definitive floras of the world and regions appropriate to a taxa is not something that copyright violation seems to cover. I do acknowledge the source of these citations, in other words a reference on the page, and so again the copyright violation of citing book names seems peculiar. I do think that an over-application of "copyright violation" seems to be occurring here. Thank you for suggesting a compromise, I will make some editing that may be acceptable to you. Please not that I have reverted your edit. I quoted the authority on the genus talking about the variability of this taxa, a long quote, but very notable in plant sciences and well-said, a refreshingly honest take on the difficulties of differentiating species and varieties. Because it is a quote I have marked it with a "box". Brunswicknic (talk) 12:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The unfortunate truth

[edit]

Your desire to make Aporosa octandra more readable by violating the WP:MOS about bolding is noble, but there is a sad truth; hardly anybody is going to read the article. The average reader who does read it certainly is not going to be keying out the species. Abductive (reasoning) 04:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't know that about bolding. True, average reader, I do like that style though, but I will change it to italics as per bolding. Brunswicknic (talk) 05:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
changed it to italics as per mos, but they are pretty weak, and what with taxa names in italics as well, it doesn't look as good. Pity, may go for lists instead. Brunswicknic (talk) 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What I do is wikilink to the more technical botanical terms, making them stand out as blue. Abductive (reasoning) 05:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Telling IPNI

[edit]

Hi, definitely tell IPNI (ipnifeedback@ipni.org) if you find good sources for dates of death that they don't have. I report stuff regularly. (There's an issue right now because some UK-based staff are furloughed, but at least one US-based person is active.) Peter coxhead (talk) 09:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Brunswicknic! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Watchlist, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Käthe Rosenthal

[edit]
Hello Brunswicknic, I just found your question from last year on the German Wikipedia. I am in the progress of writing a short article for the German Wikipedia about "your" Käthe Rosenthal, and it will be published this afternoon or evening. Please have a look at my draft text, maybe you'll find some answers already there (using google translater). If there should remain questions, feel free to contact me on my German talk-page. Best regards, --Maimaid (talk) 13:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maimaid: Thanks very much, I did assemble some biography that can be seen at Talk:List_of_botanists_by_author_abbreviation_(A)#K.Rosenth., I don't yet know if there is overlap, but it will be great to publish something on this woman, Jewish, victim of fascism botanist. Brunswicknic (talk) 13:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC) @Maimaid: I have had a quick look at your text, fantastic, though I wonder if there was any mention of her father, who I suspect was a notable rabbi with WP page in English. I better stop here, it's 12.24am on a Monday morning (long weekend, Monday is a holiday here in Melbourne, and I have been to 2 gigs and drunk alcohol, we have no covid cases in Victoria at present). Brunswicknic (talk) 13:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ficus. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zhōngguó

[edit]

What's with this "Zhōngguó" business? In English it's "China", and putting "Zhōngguó/China" in plant articles is jarring to the reader. Abductive (reasoning) 06:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of figure that 1 quarter of the world deserve to have people call their country by the name they (mostly) use themselves. It is like Myanmar and other places, the old English names don't reflect the nation or people. I use the double construction to reduce confusion. I think it's important that we recognise nations names, though as a British citizen I personally will use only 'Britain', not G.B. or U.K. I also respect Cambodians, the vast majority of who find "Kampuchea", the official names, still to painful to use and prefer Cambodia/Cambodge. Hope you and yours are well. Brunswicknic (talk) 10:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, your construct violates WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS and will become a problem. Abductive (reasoning) 17:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Ficus species

[edit]

Please do not add categories to draft pages as you did at Draft:List of Ficus species. These should only be added after the draft is moved into the mainspace. Also, once your draft is ready for publication, it is recommended that you move your draft into the mainspace, rather than copy-and-pasting the draft contents into a new article. This ensures that the page history, and thus attribution, of the draft is preserved. Bennv3771 (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to your sandbox. Regards. Bennv3771 (talk) 13:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently reverted edit on North Bay, Ontario, article

[edit]

Hi Brunswicknic,

I see your reasoning with the reversion, but the Wikipedia Manual of Style has a very clear statement on this, in MOS:CENTURY:

Do not capitalize. (and the examples which follow on that page are given in red text to indicate that they should not be done.)

Indeed, if you look at 21st century, the only capitalized instances are those which appear in proper titles.

Accordingly, and with respect, I ask that you restore the edit as I put it, because it is in full compliance with the Manual of Style.

Best regards, 1980fast (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@1980fast:, undid it, I disagree with the policy but such is life. Best wishes for your efforts to make WP a better thing, and hope you and yours are well. Brunswicknic (talk) 04:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wurfbania

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wurfbania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wurfbania elegans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danmark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Predatory journal are not first class journals

[edit]

I don't know on what grounds you consider the phytojournal to be 'first class', but it is not. It's a predatory journal. The Uddin reference should be plenty for the information. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see talk on the article talk page Talk:Tetracera_sarmentosa. You have not demonstrated that it is a predatory journal, you assert this, but offer no evidence. I did not say the journal itself is 1st class, but that it is cited in 1st class journals. That would seem to indicate that the article and journal have some merit. Again, do you have a evidence or a reliable source for the assertion. Brunswicknic (talk) 07:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the evidence I left on the talk page. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pternandra

[edit]

Hello, Brunswicknic,

Thank you for creating Pternandra.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Can you add a citation at the end of section "Description" to cover all the prose after the citation on the first line. Thanks for the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 11:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Potamogeton gemmiparus, problems

[edit]

I'm perfectly fine with the articles being merged and redirected.Asarelah (talk)

Before you revert

[edit]

at Gympie Pyramid read the source. Yes, it's borderline, but it is not a book, as your ridiculous edit summary claims, but a set of remarks in a local Shire history journal. Of course the white was talking crap, as many other people on that monument cited do. It's famous for the bullshit speculation a rock formation generates. Nishidani (talk) 15:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bucida buceras

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Bucida buceras a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Terminalia buceras. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 11:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hyperik:, ah yes, having stopped my oh-so-self-important editing and read your full message, I see that I should have requested move rather than just going ahead the simple way. Keeping the history is important. Forgive my impatience and lack of knowledge (a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing). Thank you for you work on making WP a better thing. Hope you and yours are well. Brunswicknic (talk) 12:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries! I've done the same and I'm sure someone pasted that message onto my talk page at some point. :) Most taxonomic issues can be resolved with the uncontroversial technical requests option. Only if it's potentially contentious does it need to go through the move discussion process. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 12:15, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Terminalia

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Terminalia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antidesma ghaesembilla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mallotus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

URGENT: Atriplex semibaccata

[edit]

Hi @Brunswicknic:!! I am a university student working on improving the article for Atriplex semibaccata for an assignment due in a couple days. You have visited the Atriplex semibaccata article and left some insightful suggestions. I truly appreciate this. I have incorporated your suggestions and would really appreciate if you can have a look over the article and recommend suggestions over the next couple days. I am aiming to write an additional 1000 words to improve the article class by the due date (28th May). I greatly appreciate your time and effort. Thank you!!

Also if you could please reply onto my talk page instead of here, it will be appreciated. Part of this assignment requires editors, such as yourself to interact on my talk page. Hippocrates1354 (talk) 19:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants

[edit]

Hi Brunswicknic, just a heads up for you. I noticed you recently created a new plant article here and cited an old edition (ed.7) of the Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants identification key. That edition was superceded late last year by edition 8, which you can find here, and is a better source to use in the future. Cheers —  Junglenut | talk  07:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Ficus species

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Brunswicknic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Ficus species, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brunswicknic&oldid=1056662749"