User talk:International Editor Shah

Welcome!

Hello, International Editor Shah, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tim Shell (entrepreneur), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim Shell (entrepreneur)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tim Shell (entrepreneur) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Shell exists as a redirect to Bomis, and that seems to be sufficient coverage of this person. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Shell (3rd nomination) for the most recent deletion debate (it does not seem that he has become significantly more notable since then). I have deleted your article. Happy editing, —Kusma (t·c) 12:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Wikipedia's notability guidelines requires the subject of an article to be notable in its own right, not just to be connected to some other notable subject. Thus, for example, the fact that one is the father of a notable person is not enough. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Wasi Shah

A tag has been placed on Wasi Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan

I see that at Akhtar Ali Ghulam Kazi you removed an "orphan" tag, with the edit summary "This article is not an orphan". However, yo must have made some mistake, as I have checked, and there are no links to it from any other articles at all. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Muhammad may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of Islam,''{{page needed|date=August 2014}} University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.</ref>), ([[Arabic name|full name]] '''Abū al-Qāsim Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib ibn Hāshim'''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nawab Nabi Bux Khan Bhutto (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:International Editor Shah/Nawab Nabi Bux Khan Bhutto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! International Editor Shah, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ibrahim Kabiruddin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ibrahim Kabiruddin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Kabiruddin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhammad Dilawar Khanji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junagarh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC) Thanks for tellingInternational Editor Shah (talk) 16:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Younis Hassan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Younis Hassan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Younis Hassan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rodney Jenkins (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rodney Jenkins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 18:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, International Editor Shah. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects.
Message added 14:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Edward V of England, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hasnain Mirza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MPA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad Ali Jinnah, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Faizan (talk) 11:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Taufiq Rafat.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Taufiq Rafat.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Saranglq/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yann (talk) 15:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Zafar Hussain Mirza page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hiteeka Ruchchandran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vishal Singh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ghulam Mustafa Khar page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fazil Rahu

added a link pointing to In

Mohammad Abbas Abbasi

added a link pointing to Governor of Punjab

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hiteeka Ruchchandran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiteeka Ruchchandran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiteeka Ruchchandran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Hiteeka Ruchchandran. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arnold Musto (Sukkur Barrage designer)

added a link pointing to Construct

Waleed Iqbal

added a link pointing to Javed Iqbal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Behroze Sabzwari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Famous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Emibai Jinnah (Muhammad Ali Jinnah's ex-wife)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Emibai Jinnah (Muhammad Ali Jinnah's ex-wife), International Editor Shah!

Wikipedia editor Human3015 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi, kindly expand article little bit further. Actually article Emibai Jinnah is "create protected", but you created it with another name. Its ok, but improve it. Otherwise this article will be marked for WP:AFD someday by someone. Regards

To reply, leave a comment on Human3015's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taufiq Rafat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ever. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghulam Hussain Hidayatullah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shikarpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi

Hello International Editor Shah,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MarkYabloko 10:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Previous deletion discussion was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammed Shah Kazmi. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 11:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Sheikh Liaquat at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Beqasoor (TV Series)

added a link pointing to Romance

Darbadar Tere Liye

added a link pointing to Romance

De Ijazat Jo Tu

added a link pointing to Romance

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Khaled Anam

added a link pointing to Producer

Tere Mere Beech

added a link pointing to Romance

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Mehmood Akhtar page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maana Ka Gharana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sana Javed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your best contibution on Tere Baghair Productable Khan (talk) 07:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tere Baghair) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tere Baghair, International Editor Shah!

Wikipedia editor Productable Khan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Fulfill article requirements thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Productable Khan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

New pages for HUM TV Dramas

Hi International Editor Shah,

Please can you make 2 new pages on the new HUM dramas that are on the page 'List of programs broadcast by Hum TV'? :) The 2 new pages are of the drama titles in red (Sehra Mein Safar and Aabroo)..

Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.93.94 (talk) 19:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mariyam Nafees

added links pointing to Abid Ali and Maya Ali

Aik Thi Misaal

added a link pointing to ZQ

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hijr-e-Ismail Picture.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hijr-e-Ismail Picture.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Title Screen of Ishq-e-Benaam.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Title Screen of Ishq-e-Benaam.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Safeena Sheikh

Hello International Editor Shah,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Safeena Sheikh for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wikiguide00 (talk) 17:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello, I'm Ponyo. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Shehroz Sabzwari, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 in Pakistani television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saath Nibhaana Saathiya

Hello, I'm LBM. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Saath Nibhaana Saathiya has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LBM ^{talk to me} 18:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tumhare Siwa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahsan Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nabi Bux Khan Bhutto (nawab), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unknown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pakeeza (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serial. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tere Mere Beech

Please upload Episode 10 and 11 updates for TMB and Episode 12 comes tonight... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sulaiman Ali (talk • contribs) 09:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saath Nibhaana Saathiya. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LBM ^{talk to me} 18:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Picture of Ishq-e-Benaam Drama.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Picture of Ishq-e-Benaam Drama.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zindagi Tujh Ko Jiya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shahbaz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official title screen of Pakeeza Hum TV.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official title screen of Pakeeza Hum TV.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shahrukh Khan Ki Maut

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shahrukh Khan Ki Maut requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jdcomix (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahrukh Khan Ki Maut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imran Ali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Saranglq/sandbox

Hello, International Editor Shah. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shahrukh Khan Ki Maut

Hello International Editor Shah,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shahrukh Khan Ki Maut for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Md Hashim azmi shaikh (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Udaari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nasrullah Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali Abbas (actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ali Abbas (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sports Devotee (talk) 10:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hasnain Mirza with his father.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hasnain Mirza with his father.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hasnain Mirza with his father.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hasnain Mirza with his father.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Riffat Aapa Ki Bahuein

The article Riffat Aapa Ki Bahuein has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 12:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ali Abbas (actor)

The article Ali Abbas (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. bonadea contributions talk 10:13, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Riffat Aapa Ki Bahuein

The article Riffat Aapa Ki Bahuein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

CSD A3 inapplicable as infobox is present and CSD A1 is inapplicable as it is possible to determine that this is a television show. Article was created as an infobox only a week ago and no additional content has been added during the week. Notability doubtful at best, even if content was present. Since there is no content outside the infobox, not worth bothering with this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 15:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jhoot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akbar Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kathputli (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajesh Kumar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for List of Mann Mayal episodes

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of Mann Mayal episodes —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Sammy.joseph (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Podturr Of Laaj.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official Podturr Of Laaj.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Posture Of Bin Roye Drama.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official Posture Of Bin Roye Drama.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Podturr Of Laaj.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official Podturr Of Laaj.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:08, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HUM TV

Hi,

Please could you re-direct drama serial page Daasi to the drama page you created Sang-e-Mar Mar as they are the same drama.

Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:6005:5600:3029:11AD:FBF1:97B6 (talk) 16:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dil-e-Beqarar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Die. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jamal Shah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahsan Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Posture Of Bin Roye Drama.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official Posture Of Bin Roye Drama.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, on en.WP we almost never link common terms ("television", etc), country-names, years/dates. Thanks. Tony (talk) 01:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bin Roye

The reason why i am going to tell you, what i will tell you is that your contribution is significant in this article which i am revamping and i mean everything. So i will be needing your corporation, once i will save my edits. Any removal of material without starting an discussion and war editing will not be tolerated. You can see my work on Mann Mayal, Diyar-e-Dil and other to see what i am talking about. So in two to three days, Bin Roye article will be ready. Nauriya Rendezvous 14:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, International Editor Shah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Continued issues with sourcing

I can't help but notice that you are still adding unsourced content to biography articles despite previous messages explaining why reliable sources are required. Please ensure that you are including sources meeting this criteria when adding personal info to biographies.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Janam Jali (Season 2)

Hi, you recently made this edit reverting my removal of an invalid CSD tag. Could you please explain why you believe {{Db-g7}} applies here? You may wish to read the relevant CSD criteria before answering -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 14:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assalamu-Alaikum (if you are Muslim) or Hi (if you are of other), I think that g7 applies here because it isn't referenced and it's lack of Notability. I apologize if I am incorrect, but g7 will not apply if you add some references in this article. I am adding some tags of unreferenced. Please don't remove that tag until you find a suitable reference from google. Acually, Hum TV has never distributed the drama with name Janam Jali. It was never released in 2016, you can even search from google. You look like a senior editor so I request you to please don't create Hoax with adding such article. If you did't improve article in 7 days, I will delete it. Please read this notice.... International Editor Shah (talk) 13:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arbab Chandio

The article Arbab Chandio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per cited sources, the subject has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. It fails to pass the notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justice007 (talk) 10:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Woh Aik Pal) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Woh Aik Pal, International Editor Shah!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs at least one more reference, other than that it is OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Insert CleverPhrase Here 12:09, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saya-e-Dewar Bhi Nahi (novel)

Hello, International Editor Shah. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Saya-e-Dewar Bhi Nahi (novel), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saya-e-Dewar Bhi Nahi (novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saya-e-Dewar Bhi Nahi (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saya-e-Dewar Bhi Nahi (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeh Raha Dil has been accepted

Yeh Raha Dil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kitni Girhain Baaki Hain (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oppo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sangsaar

Thank you for making the draft Draft:Sangsaar. It appears to me that you have written the Pakistani drama wrong. According to Hum TV Sangsaar is written as Sangsar. In the future please make sure you write names of people dramas etc. correctly.--Plum3600^"talk" 20:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions/changes

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Hum TV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Yaqeen Ka Safar. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Woh Aik Pal

The article Woh Aik Pal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 09:41, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Woh Aik Pal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woh Aik Pal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woh Aik Pal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AussieLegend (✉) 20:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alif Allah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Religious drama. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox images

Hi, the file wizard is incorrect for infoboxes, this category Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images flags pages that do not conform with WP:INFOBOXIMAGE and need adjustment that is where this article has been included when the infobox format is wrong, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TheRedPenOfDoom

Hi there, re: this

Watch the personal attacks.
I never got the sense TRPOD was Indian, so I doubt he would understand your insult unless he Googled it.
TheRedPenOfDoom hasn't edited at Wikipedia in a year and a half, which means your frustrated complaint is falling on deaf ears.
It's super-weird to be upset about something that happened a year and a half ago, and that weirdness really has me interested, so now I'm gonna poke my nose deep into this!
TRPOD didn't delete Wasi Shah. Only administrators can delete articles. TRPOD was not an administrator. He PRODed it, but the prod was removed by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Being angry at TRPOD for the article deletion is totally irrational.
The article as of 28 August 2015 was in really bad shape. It comprised about 5 sentences and did nothing to establish notability. Most of the references were blogs, faceless websites and social networking sites.
The article as of 4 December 2015 was just ridiculous. It was an unsourced grammatical nightmare and contained absurd fluff like "Wasi shah is a multi talented personality." "He write many admirable poems" "Wasi got married in 2001, it was a love marriage." "He also showed his skills"...
There were also two AfDs held on the subject:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wasi Shah and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Wasi Shah. The result of both was that the article should be deleted for failure to establish notability.

So, basically, various versions of the article have always been messy and insufficient for inclusion. Not sure why you're upset about this so long after the fact. Well actually that's not true, I do have an inkling that you're upset because this article was written about you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. That wasn't about me. Actually as seeing him best writer in many projects, I decided to make his wikipedia page. Thank you for replying but my actual name is not 'Wasi Shah'. But no problem, I will make or even he will become more famous. --International Editor Shah (talk) 12:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It still doesn't explain why, a year-and-a-half after the fact, you thought it necessary to drum up old conflicts. That doesn't sound rational to me. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I was really not told that fact International Editor Shah (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your response. Also, see point #3 and #4 above, where I comment on the bizarre timing of your pot-stirring. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I have told the fact that Fatima Khan and Kibra Khan are sisters in real life and also Ahmad Ali Butt is her real brother-in-law, then why have you blocked me?

Decline reason:

You are blocked for adding unsourced content. It is your responsibility to provide a reliable citation for any information you add. See WP:CITE and WP:RS. As your unblock request does not address this, I am declining your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 18:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Shah, your casual attitude toward sourcing, specifically here, where you take a 'meh, I'll source it later' attitude is not appropriate. Per WP:BURDEN when you are challenged for a source, you need to bring one the next time you restore the disputed content, not kick the matter down the road to deal with later. Wikipedia has WP:NODEADLINE, so we're not under any pressure to be 100% accurate 100% of the time, and we don't run a "facts first, sourcing later" operation here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rehaai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashback. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HUM Pages

Hi,

Please could u kindly make pages for 'Jithani', 'Woh Aik Pal' and 'Mohabbat Khawab Safar' on HUM TV. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:6022:8000:C53A:929C:4731:5CC9 (talk) 21:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

While your block is active, you are not permitted to blank existing unblock declines. You may remove other content from your page as you see fit, though. --Yamla (talk) 14:00, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Ponyo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I don't know what your deal is but you've got to stop this absurd behavior, any further disruption, including but not limited to posting frivolous warnings is going to result in you getting blocked. The only reason I haven't done that now is because of your long editing history, but it's quite apparent that you don't want that to count for anything. —SpacemanSpiff 11:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Disruptive editing including repeated frivolous warnings to editors in good standing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 11:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18348 was submitted on May 22, 2017 12:03:31. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shah, if you submit pointless unblock requests like this, you are very quickly going to irritate the community. "My account was blocked only because I took revenge from User:Ponyo because he had blocked me in innocence." Firstly, you were blocked for violating policy by repeatedly submitting unsourced content. So that was a legitimate block. Secondly, we do not take "revenge" on other editors at Wikipedia. Period. Wikipedia is not for everybody. It's a community project that can be very frustrating to a certain type of editor, particularly to editors who are prone to getting angry. I don't know if that describes you, but if so, you basically have two options: Improve your behavior or find another hobby. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:SpacemanSpiff, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for repeated harassment of users in good standing through posting totally frivolous user warnings, notices etc on their talk pages (see contributions), in spite of just coming off a one-week block for the exact same behaviour. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 08:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GoldenRing (talk) 11:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note to other admins: feel free to modify this block without consulting me. GoldenRing (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18556 was submitted on Jun 20, 2017 10:40:09. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You had blocked me from editing from 30 May amd upto now I apologize for my mistakes and please give me one chance to improve and surely you will not get any complains.International Editor Shah (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please note that this editor has been indefinitely CU-blocked for abusing multiple accounts (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/International Editor Shah), so the block notice further up in this section is past history, and not the current block. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 13:16, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also note that per the SPI, International Editor Shah is not the oldest account, and I'm unaware of any situation where we ever unblocked a sock account instead of the master. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood that disruptive editing is not allowed in Wikipedia and I heartedly apologize for my behavior. You had blocked me from 1 month then how can you expect that I am telling lie. International Editor Shah (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration at this time as you have been engaging in block evasion using Helperspiff (talk · contribs). Given the years of abuse, your only remaining hope, and it's very, very faint, is to apply under WP:SO. That requires six months of zero edits. Zero. From any account. Let me say that again. Zero edits from any account. Yamla (talk) 10:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are lying as we speak, since you claim to have only been blocked for a month, when, as you well know, you were blocked indefinitely after a "check user" confirmed that you had been abusing multiple accounts... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If anybody wants to consider this unblock, notice that the oldest account I could find in the SPI is Special:Contributions/Faizanali.007, which was blocked by User:Wizardman in May, 2013. An unblock wouldn't seem to have much upside, given the history. EdJohnston (talk) 15:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Shah, what is the first account you had at Wikipedia? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was first account and others which I have created after it are Helperspiff and Astronomyspiff but I used this account mostly. International Editor Shah (talk) 09:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. I didn't say that I have been blocked for a month but instead I am saying that I was blocked on 29 May 2017 and month of going to be passed. International Editor Shah (talk) 09:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will not say you to unblock me because I deserve it but at least set expire time of block. International Editor Shah (talk) 10:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You users actually don't deserve my apology and good behaviour. I am apologizing repeatedly and you cruel people are not forgiving me. Go to Hell, I don't want any unblock and you Cyphoidbomb, do one thing that delete my account so that I have no any care. You are cruel and haters pod humanity and you will be never happy in life. International Editor Shah (talk) 10:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You apologized, but didn't actually specify what you were apologizing for, other than "disruptive" behavior. Administrators need to know that you understand what specifically you did wrong, so that we can be sure you won't repeat the problem in the future. That's why we ask you to explain in detail. If an editor is blocked for copyright violations, but then apologizes for "disruptive behavior", administrators have no idea if that person knows what a copyright violation is, or even if they know how they violated our policies. So, that's a problem. However, the bigger issue here is that "International Editor Shah" is not your first account. You have other older ones, and as a matter of policy, we do not unblock secondary or "sockpuppet" accounts. You must request an unblock from your very first account. Oh, and I'm very happy in life, thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uff! The people like you are people who cannot see others happiness. And that's the real reason why you have named your account Cyphoidbomb. You apply nuclear bomb to people only because you are arrogant. Oh, when I said that this will effect you this time it will effect naturally but you don't believe because you are Christian. Sorry, Bomber I am Muslim. International Editor Shah (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. You don't want to be unblocked, and we won't tolerate personal attacks here. --Yamla (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18658 was submitted on Jul 05, 2017 13:52:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18684 was submitted on Jul 09, 2017 09:54:29. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alif Allah Aur Insaan Title Screen.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alif Allah Aur Insaan Title Screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:12, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Mohabbat Khawab Safar

Hello, International Editor Shah,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mohabbat Khawab Safar should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohabbat Khawab Safar .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Zazzysa (talk) 16:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bad Gumaan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bad Gumaan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Gumaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SahabAli wadia 11:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alif Allah Aur Insaan (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alif Allah Aur Insaan (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alif Allah Aur Insaan (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SahabAli wadia 13:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ali Abbas (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Abbas (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Abbas (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SahabAli wadia 13:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ali Abbas (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Abbas (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Abbas (actor) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SahabAli^{говорити} 17:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Emibai Jinnah

Template:Emibai Jinnah has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Störm (talk) 15:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20379 was submitted on Jan 19, 2018 13:57:56. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abbas Rizvi (poet) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abbas Rizvi (poet) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbas Rizvi (poet) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20917 was submitted on Mar 19, 2018 09:18:30. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:18, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly, I thank User:Yunshui for giving me one more chance. Secondly stating that, I had been blocked from more than 6 months for my disruptive behavior and also blaming administrators for my own fault. I admit that I used to do that because as my further sockpuppets blocked, I realized my mistakes. Fortunately there was WP:SO which gave me one more chance of 6 months with 0 edits which I accepted. Now since more than 8 months have been passed, so I request that I have realized so much during this period. I will now constructively edit articles as said. I seek apologization from User:Cyphoidbomb, User:Ponyo and User:Spacemanspiff whom I had uselessly blamed in my angerness and I request the same (and other) administrators that if again disruption comes out from my account they are free and welcome to block me. I shall be thankful to you for trusting me. Thanks!

Decline reason:

Decline unblock given Checkuser evidence of block evasion provided by Bbb23 below. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-admin comment Hmm...I suppose that the administrators might consider this, but with your tantrums in the last block it seems unlikely. You have to prove to them that they can trust you again, and I suggest following the instructions here. Note that if you ever revert to your previous behaviours, I can almost guarantee you your reblock will be swift and truly indefinite. Invalidated after following comments. Zyc1174 _chat? ^{what I did} 16:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 and SpacemanSpiff: notifying you all of this appeal in case you have not seen it. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
IES has been socking with IPs extensively. I counted at least 48 IPs who are Technically indistinguishable and who are behaviorally compelling. This user's block request should be denied, and the standard offer should not be extended another six months given their track record. It's not clear to me that they should ever be unblocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I might never be unblocked but still can I be given one chance because I've completed my WP:SO? I've never been away so much from Wikipedia like these 6 months thus being more aware with the policies of Wikipedia and so, I want to come as more changed user than before.

Decline reason:

The last time you made an unblock request, you lied about your editing. Given your extensive history of sockpuppetry and block evasion, you are probably now considered banned rather than blocked under WP:3X, though this is not absolutely certain. Regardless, I'm unwilling at this time to even ask a checkuser to determine if you've been lying again, because there's not enough in this unblock request to justify considering it. You've been blocked for persistent unsourced additions, for disruptive editing, for sockpuppetry, for block evasion, and for lying about this. You'll need to account for your previous bad behaviour and convince us you'll never do any of that again, before we even start deciding whether to lift the block. You are welcome to make a new request which accounts for all of this. Note that such a request may end up being copied to WP:AN for discussion with the community. Therefore, please make sure your request is complete and compelling. It must fully address your previous bad behaviour. For example, saying "I won't do unsourced additions" isn't sufficient, we need to be convinced you understand what was wrong with your previous edits and specifically how your future edits would be different. You'll also need to explain why you previously said you had six months with 0 edits when this was an outright lie; this substantially damaged our trust in your word, which will make it far harder to obtain community consensus to lift your ban. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Shahzad Iqbal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahzad Iqbal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahzad Iqbal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Official title screen of Pakeeza Hum TV.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official title screen of Pakeeza Hum TV.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

International Editor Shah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request being unblocked, I had applied for WP:SO but had not been using this account since quite time. I apologize for my all my behaviour of sockpuppetry and disruptive editing in the past. I assure you that nothing will happen now as past...I was unaware of Wikipedia's rulings at that time. But I assure that nothing will happen again like past. International Editor Shah (talk) 12:57, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request seeks to minimize your past errors. There is simply no way this will be accepted by the community, so I will not be posting it to WP:AN. You have had several chances to write a credible unblock request. I am declining talk page access, so your only remaining route is via WP:UTRS. PhilKnight (talk) 15:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of Kitni Girhain Baaki Hain.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of Kitni Girhain Baaki Hain.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yeh Raha Dil

The article Yeh Raha Dil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mere Khuda

The article Mere Khuda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mere Khuda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mere Khuda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mere Khuda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 00:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Title Screen of Mere Khuda.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Title Screen of Mere Khuda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bad Gumaan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bad Gumaan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Gumaan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]