User talk:HughMorris15

Welcome!

Hello, HughMorris15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ruta Gedmintas has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Flyer22 (talk) 01:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, which edit is this about? HughMorris15 (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Roy L. Dennis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Wasell. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Riki Lindhome without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please, don't remove references. —Wasell^(T) 18:58, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A.J. Styles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jdcomix (talk) 04:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMOGRAPHY edits

Please slow down with your edits to WP:FILMOGRAPHY tables until you've actually reviewed the guideline so you have better idea of what you should be doing. I would also encourage you to perform your edits to Filmography tables (which have been problematic) separately from your edits to article text (which have looked OK to me upon a very quick perusal) so you have a lesser portion of your work reverted – in other words, if you do your revisions in small chunks over more edits, it might work to your benefit. Finally, you should also review some other guidelines such as WP:DATERANGE and WP:OVERLINK. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned, and yet you continue to make edits that ignore guidelines. If you keep this up, a block may be in your future. You can avoid that if you would simply start following Wikipedia guidelines. Continuing to ignore them will not go well for you... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I notice you are still doing these wrong as of February 12. At this point, I'd strongly urge you to just stay away from editing Filmography tables, as you seem uninterested in learning the relevant guidelines for editing Filmography tables properly. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joel McHale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loyola University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Carlson Young. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You continue to ignore Wikipedia guidelines with your edits. Please stop doing so before it is too late. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To Hugh Morris15- Please undo your recent edit to the page on me - Alec Newman. You correctly notice that my name by birth is indeed Mark Newman but your opening sentence Mark "Alec" Newman is wholly misleading making it seem like my professional name Alec is a nickname. Kindly correct your last edit to remedy this situation. Appreciated.

Alec Newman Burmaman74 (talk) 23:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barry Pepper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sketches. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Lewis Carroll, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. I'm not sure if you're testing out your ability to pipe wikilinks at the above article, but whatever the reason, you need to stop doing so. Hallward's Ghost ^(Kevin) ^{(My talkpage)} 21:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billy Corben, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dear John and Parenthood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Curt Hennig page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Briga Heelan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hardcore Henry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First person. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Italicization of wrestling moves

Please stop italicizing wrestling move names. MOS:TITLE clearly states that italics are inappropriate to apply to move names, and italicization of wrestling moves is not something I can find support for in any style guide (or in WWE's own material) I've checked . That an error is commonly repeated does not make it acceptable. --Xanzzibar (talk) 02:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for intruding in the talk, but while italicizing the real, regular name of a move is inappropriate, italicizing a special name or a nickname for a move is supported by Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Style guide#In wrestling.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 14:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dr. Dre may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Dwayne Johnson, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lapsley

Hi there, you recently changed Lapsley's nationality to English from British. She has recognised her Scottish heritage in interviews, as referenced in the text. That is why British is more appropriate. Please consider an amend. Mountain^cirque 11:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chevy Chase, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 1988 Academy Awards and 1987 Academy Awards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bryan Cranston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dan Clark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Metro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jesse Hughes (musician). Mlpearc (open channel) 20:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silent disco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions

Please read this guideline carefully before changing any more names: MOS:NAME, including MOS:BIRTHNAME. We start with the name that the person was known by, and then we give the birth name. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic Group Flags

Hi. I noticed your addition of flags to a number of ethnic group article infoboxes. I'm not keen on it, and brought it up on the template talk page. Would appreciate your thinking on this. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HughMorris15. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" edits

I've noticed repeatedly that you make significant changes to articles marking them as minor. Worse, you include an edit summary that reinforces the misrepresentation: "minor format edits". See Douglas Booth. I just reverted your changes to that article. You should only be marking edits as minor if they are indeed minor, e.g., fixing a typo, adding italics, adding a comma, that sort of thing. Otherwise, you should include a descriptive edit summary of what you're actually doing to the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. How was this edit on Carrie Nation "minor"? And you did a lot more than the edit summary suggests. Please stop checking 'This is a minor edit" unless the edit is actually minor, and please better describe the changes you are making. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 13:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Karst. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lemmy seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Karst (talk) 14:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality

Hi, please don't change nationalities of BLPs without any kind of referencing or indeed, even mentioning it in your edit summary. Changing British to English, for example, is very strongly discouraged unless you have a good reason for doing it. Likewise removing "UK" from the infobox – where it is present, there's usually a good reason for it which you may not know about. Thanks, Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Peter Dinklage. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. - AffeL (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikiproject!

Hello, HughMorris15! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Chris Crocker , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 01:20, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lanzarote, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bodybuilding, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Typecast and Weight lifting. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kevin Costner

added a link pointing to Lakota

Sandra Bullock

added a link pointing to Three Sisters

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Be careful with your edits – you keep introducing errors, like this [1]. South Yorkshire didn't exist in 1969. If you don't know this stuff, don't edit British place names. And I've mentioned this to you before: stop removing 'UK' wherever you see it, you're starting to look like you have a serious bias about that. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Can you use a clear edit summary, or split your edits so that it is clear to other users what you are changing. In many cases you say "moving ref" and are actually doing much more and removing information from infoboxes. This could be seen as disruptive. Aloneinthewild (talk) 22:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spike Wilbury (talk) 12:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My main concern is that you have a long history of people asking you to stop making unsourced changes, using misleading edit summaries, and disregarding the Manual of Style. You have failed to respond to these requests or heed the advice, so this is a preventative block as your edits are largely disruptive. If you continue to ignore these requests after the block, you will be blocked for longer periods of time. A prime example is this edit which you characterize as "reformatted a quote" but in reality you introduced unsourced content, MoS errors, and other issues that required a blanket revert. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 12:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HughMorris15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Piping links

Please review WP:NOTBROKEN. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 18:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maxine Peake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ricky Naputi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you recently removed content from David Bowie without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Unless I missed something, you said you "moved" the Guardian source but it looks to me like you just deleted it. ? - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 19:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HughMorris15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reggie Watts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Art Institute of Seattle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Vistadan. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also review WP:NOTBROKE and do not remove "birth_name" from infoboxes unless its the same as "name". Vistadan 16:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Prince (musician), you may be blocked from editing. You have previously been reverted upon removing the cause of death. Continued removals of this will result in further warnings and I will then ask an admin to take action. Ss112 00:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brad Pitt. You have now been warned by multiple editors to put correct edit summaries for your edits and not use misleading ones. You also need to stop removing content from Infoboxes without a valid reason. Vistadan 12:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spike Wilbury (talk) 16:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're still making edits with misleading edit summaries and disregarding the MoS, and failed to engage with other editors about those concerns. You haven't made any efforts to communicate with other users since 2016. Spike Wilbury (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hard-Off for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hard-Off is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hard-Off until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]