User talk:HarryCane

This user may have left Wikipedia. HarryCane has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hi HarryCane, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia.

Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images.

How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status.

Manual of Style, how articles should be written.

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

RC Patrol - Keeping a lookout for vandalism.

Cleanup - Help make unreadable articles readable.

Requests - Wanted on WP, but hasn't been created.

Merge - Combining duplicate articles into one.

Wikiprojects - So many to join, so many to choose from...Take your pick!

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 20:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nothing Gold Can Stay Query

I appreciate your messaging me but I don't understand why what I did was "all wrong" and something that I "Can't Do". The album is named for the poem which pre-dates it by several years, it makes no sense to have an article based upon a name-sake, reference to 'Nothing Gold Can Stay' as the main article and the original work and source of the name as a subsiduary article. An original work will clearly take precedent over later references to the work in any encylopaedia, the New Found Glory article being there first makes no difference to this. You also did a very messy job on your revert, needlessly removing clearly pertinent links to Robert Frost and his poem as well as leaving many links going to the wrong place which you didn't bother to fix. If you're going to make changes you could at least do so without reducing the usefulness of numerous other articles in the process.

Nothing Gold Can Stay redux

Hello, HarryCane. I thought I'd inform you that User:MagicBez has requested outside assistance at WP:MEDCAB regarding the article Nothing Gold Can Stay. I just wanted to run a suggestion by you, and see if you'd be alright with it.

You were correct in reverting his change to the article, as he cut and pasted the text rather than properly moving the entire thing. However, I don't think the article should stay where it is. I would personally change it to a disambiguation page, with the current text moved to Nothing Gold Can Stay (album) and with Robert Frost's poem at Nothing Gold Can Stay (poem). Are you okay with that? Rob e rt ^{T | @ | C} 05:25, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. (I also left a note on MagicBez's talk page about this as well.)

NGCS (aside)

Just to satisfy my own curiosity, what was the "false information" that I put into the album article?MagicBez 05:24, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NGCS (aside)

I'll do a google later and find an interview where the band talk about it. It's a very famous poem and the album (and album cover image) are a direct reference to the message of the poem. Chances are that they referenced it via the Outsiders "stay gold ponyboy" and all that but that's where the title comes from.

NGCS (aside)

OK a very quick google search turned up this quote from the QandA section of newfoundglory.com: "I was sitting in English class the other day and my teacher gave us a poem to read... Nothing Gold Can Stay by Robert Frost and I was wondering if you named your album after that or is it totally irrelevant? (asked by dropkicktims)" STEVE: Indirectly it is named after the poem, but we really did it because of the movie "The Outsiders."

A Google cache of the site can be found at: [1] Am I OK to edit this back into the article now?

Members x Line-up

While it is perfectly fine to use Members, that's what we normally use for "groups". In the case of "bands", we generally use Line-up. Regards, --Sn0wflake 16:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to do with that project overthrown by clueless newbies, and as such, consider anything which comes from it as non-canon. Do whatever you want, this encyclopedia is coming apart anyway. Nobody gives a fuck anymore. Forget I gave you a suggestion. --Sn0wflake 16:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Starting Line Spam?

Hey, I wasn't trying to spam anything, A bunch of people messaged me from livejournal and recommended that I change the picture, as they thought it was better than what was up there previously... No harm meant :-)

User:HarryCane/images

Hi, since we are not allowed to display fair use images on user pages and user subpages (see Wikipedia:Fair use#Fair use policy) I took the liberty of turning your image gallery into a list of links instead. If any of them where free licensed feel free to place those images in a gallery, but leave the fair use ones as a list. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 00:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hellogoodbye Lowercase title

The band's name is not capitalized. It should be hellogoodbye and not Hellogoodbye. I had changed all of the problems with the capitalization until you decided it was necessary to undo everything I did. If you need proof, here are some sites that can prove it;

[2]
[3]

--Russ is the sex 17:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This Disaster DVD Cover

Thanks for getting a better picture. It looks a lot better. Sharpdust 17:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay...

So I guess it's okay for others to keep editing information you scold me about, incorrectly I may add. Right. Whatever. RattleandHum

Lanemeyer

The info you requested on Lanemeyer's "Songs We Hated The Least"

18 tracks, was given away for free at their FIRST reunion show, dated December 26, 2003. CDR with a b&w printed label, slimline jewel case. No sleeve or sleeve art. Track list is as follows:

Another Lonely Winter
Broken Dream November
Figure It Out
For Britt
Fuck You And Your Boyfriend
Grovers Corners NJ
Long Letter Goodbye
My Very Own Winnie Cooper
Socko In The Ring
Take Two
Thursday
What A Shitty Summer
Where's My Letter
With Or Without You
Don't Hate Me
CKone
Me And You On The Big Screen
(Bonus Song) Day At The Fair - Eastern Homes and Western Hearts

If you're going to make changes to the article, please post them on the discussion page first. Thanks! TearJohnDown 22:51, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Starting Line tracks

Where is this Wikipedia policy you speak of? And what common usage are you referring to? Every band page I see on here lists songs that are not on any of their albums. I don't understand what the problem is. These songs were recorded for "Based on a True Story" but were cut when the album was released. They have since been RELEASED BY THE BAND on their webpages. It's not like these songs are bootlegged live recordings or anything like that. I'll put this in the Starting Line discussion page and see what others have to say so this dispute can be worked out. User:12.5.1.207 14:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Dingsbums.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dingsbums.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P!ATD "I Write Sins, Not Tragedies" page

Thanks for cleaning that up, I appreciate it.

P!ATD Formation Date

The band formed in 2004, please do not revert my change!

Yellowcard

Hi, there! I saw that you've contributed to the Yellowcard page. I've been working hard all weekend to get it into an encyclopedia-worthy article, and I think we're almost there!

There's a short list of things that still need some work at the bottom of the talk page. If you could take a look at it, maybe add more things to do, or clean up whatever you see needs work, I would sure appreciate it.

Thanks for your help. Have an awesome day! Cathryn 10:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The All-American Rejects

Please do not revert my copyediting on this article. I realized that you are the primary contributor on that article, but you do not own the article. Therefore, let other people make necessary (especially copyediting) style changes. You reverted a good faith edit and treated as if it was vandalism. Also, you accused me of changing the genre, which I did not. I only changed the prose to say rock band instead of power pop. "Rock band" is what they are and I don't consider that a genre. Please reply here on your talk page if you have any questions or comments for me. Thanks. Sarbox 17:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, with power pop being a subgenre of rock and roll, changing power pop band to rock band is an unnecessary generalisation of the type of music the band plays. And the em dash is not used in this context, to keep the article on par with other band and album articles (see the guidelines). Hence, changing it is most definitely not a "necessary style change". Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dashes) also gives insight on when to use which dash (in this case: "Em dashes are sometimes used incorrectly to separate lists of items from their definitions."). I'm changing it back, but if you still disagree, we should take this discussion to Talk:The All-American Rejects. --HarryCane 17:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:RushmoreLogo.jpg

The image does have a source, it says it's the logo of Rushmore Records, wich means it's copyrighted by Rushmore Records, that's all we need to know. Sure yes it doesn't spesify an URL, but a bit of common sense can be applied to these things. The source is supposed to tell us who own the copyright to this image, and in this case saying who's logo it is is sufficient, the company own the copyright to theyr logo regardles of where the image was downloaded from or who drew that particular version of it. See for example Category talk:Images with unknown source#Sources again for a relevant discussion about this. --Sherool (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

^{Copied from my talk page. --Sherool (talk) 17:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

The description "The logo for the Record Label Rushmore Records" does not qualify as a detailed source description. The {{logo}}-tag even tells you to add a fair use rationale and a description of the work's source and copyright status. Also, the PUI-tag says not to remove it while the question is being considered. As far as Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images goes, it still is, so the tag shouldn't be removed. --HarryCane 15:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure the source could have been better, but it does not qualify as "no source" either. Applying common sense is allowed, we know it's the logo of Rushmore Records and therefore copyrighted by Rushmore Records, exactly what about the copyright status do you consider to be unclear? There are a lot of gray area cases, but IMHO this and most other logos are not one of them (see Template talk:No source#Logos for another related discussion). I just think your efforts could be better spent on genuinely problematic images, like making sure fair use in... type images have fair use rationales, since there is an actual policy to delete those if they don't have a rationale (see {{no rationale}}), of tracking down images that have no source and where the origin is not self-evident. --Sherool (talk) 17:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Although no consensus was reached in the end, I still wanted to thank you for your vote in my recent RfA. Thank you very much. Fritz S. (Talk) 17:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Parachute

If anything, the mention should be merged into hellogoodbye. The speedy delete was not necesary, no need to get so pissed off.--Russ is the sex 01:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was a tad angry that day. No worries, happy now. I'll add the source, it's Forrest himself.--Russ is the sex 14:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about your page move

Hi, I had a question about your page move of Cute Is What We Aim For to Cute Is What We Aim for. You referenced Wikipedia:Naming conventions as the reason for this change, however, this policy states, "In titles of songs or albums, unless it is unique, the standard rule in the English language is to capitalize words that are the first or the last word in the title and those that are not conjunctions (and, but, or, nor, for)..." Since this is not a song or album but instead the band's name, it seems this policy would not apply. Would you have any concerns about reverting this? Regards, Accurizer 12:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your response on my talk page. I posted a question regarding this policy at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions#Interpretation of "Album titles and band names" because I think either way, the policy could be made more clear. Please take a look at the way I phrased the question and add to it or comment if you would like. Thanks. Regards, Accurizer 12:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "last word" part may have escaped you because I added it to the guideline recently :-) I did it because all the capitalization guidelines I found on the Internet recommend capitalizing the last word of a title (for example see [4] [5] [6]). Nobody opposed to this change so I guess it's OK. Jogers (talk) 13:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allister

They are stubs because there are no personnel/credits listed; producers, engineers, additional musicians etc Jubella 17:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rxbandits

dude, get over yourself. you are no authority of wikipedia. cool your jets son. Love, Myxomatosis 21:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah will do. I never said you were wrong though... on a side note are you sure the new Rx Bandits was released? The reason being is because it has a street date in October. I know they wanted to release it now but they had a posting on their site saying it was in October. -Myxomatosis 20:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nice, I won't have the money to see them on their current tour so I pre-ordered it too. It's probably their best work. Although I am very partial to Progress. Should be put October 10, as a release date too then? -Myxomatosis 20:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Something Corporate

Thanks for reverting my changes to the Something Corporate page, reguarding the song "If You C Jordan." You stated your caps are according to the Audioboxer EP. Need I remind you of Wikipedia's capitalisation policies for bands, albums, and song titles? I think you already know yourself judging by what you left on user Russ_is_the_sex's page. "I reverted your edits to the Zombies! Aliens! Vampires! Dinosaurs! article. On Wikipedia, we go by guidelines for song titles and section headers, not by the capitalisation posted on the band's official homepage. Regards, HarryCane 16:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)"

I will go ahead and revert to my previous correct changes. Thanks.

-68.90.192.190 17:41, 8 July 2006

If you see WP:NC#Album_titles_and_band_names, you will notice that it clearly says:

Convention: In band names and titles of songs or albums, unless it is unique, the standard rule in the English language is to capitalize words that are the first or the last word in the title ...

Meaning, the song "iF yoU C Jordan" has a unique capitalisation intentional by the artist (the intention being emphasizing the letters to spell out "FUC Jordan"). The hellogoodbye situation was entirely different, as it was just messed up due to a different style guide the homepage was using, and by no means an official unique spelling. Have a good day, HarryCane 11:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about vandal IP

You said that vandal IP you told me about created Atticus675 as an account. Was a Request for CheckUser run and came up conclusive? Get back to me when you find that out. Also, I recommend posting a notice about that IP at Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard/Incidents. That's more than simple vandalism, and an admin may be able to do more than I can. Good luck. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 17:11, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More P!atD

Consider talking about removed wiki band style templates off page before removing because of your disinterest in one user Hackajar 12:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, if you take a look at the suggestion I made on Talk:Panic! at the Disco, that was a whole day before you voted on the The_Only_Difference_Between_Martyrdom_And_Suicide_Is_Press_Coverage deletion debate. And even if it wasn't, I couldn't care less what for or if at all you voted. If you would also look at my contributions history, I reverted your edits to the Panic! at the Disco article before I even took a look at your talk page and saw you blanked it — I didn't even know you voted on the deletion debate. Not because of my so-called "disinterest in one user", but because you made a whole mess of the discography, I reverted your changes. Here are some of your mistakes:

"#24 Australia" shouldn't be in the column U.K. album-chart position
excessive overlinking of years
excessive overlinking of A Fever You Can't Sweat Out
why making a U.S. and U.K. sales column with no content?
you made a seperate section for "Other Charts" (which btw shouldn't be capitalised), thus listing every single twice, even though "Lying Is the Most Fun a Girl Can Have without Taking Her Clothes Off" didn't chart on any other charts

Please understand, I did none of these edits to spite you, only to constructively add to the article's appearance and clarity. If you want to make these kinds of changes, you need to discuss it first on the talk page, especially when a discussion concerning that matter has already been started. --HarryCane 12:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page for responses (and google 'hackajar' sometime I'm not some snooty wiki squatter) Hackajar 13:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you were a Wiki Admin, so sorry about all this...Oh wait, your NOT nevermind Hackajar 15:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of your speedy tag

Hey -- apparently it is an image from a music video. I agree the fair use claim is not being used properly, but CSD I7 only goes so far. For instance, if it had been tagged with {{logo}}, which is truly patently unrelated to the image, I would have deleted it. Unfortunately in cases like this, speedy deletion is not the answer. However, I'm going to go remove it from any articles it is used improperly in, and mark it as orphaned if I remove it from all of them. Mango juice^talk 14:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Impersonation?

Who said I wasn't? I'm just bored while we're not doing anything in Europe. Not changing my name.

-Jon—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jon Walker (talk • contribs) .

Panic! At the Disco

I understand naming conventions, however, P!ATD's name has "At" capitalized. It is found this way on all official websites and releases. I think that overrules Wikipedia's naming conventions. Evan Reyes 20:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your threats to tattle on me to daddy do not scare me. I believe that if the band chooses to name themselves Panic! At the Disco, that should be reflected on wikipedia. Evan Reyes 19:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't edited anyone's comments. I don't know where the hell you came up with that, but if you're trying to falsely accuse me of something because I did so with you, I just want you to know that I was only joking. --Scotteh 12:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see what you mean. Don't feel bad, I know exactly what you mean. Sometimes I freak out too it's totally human. But that still doesn't justify my actions. Perhaps it was wrong to change the depths of the comments because, even though the content stays the same, people will then misread the comments' context. Hope my English is understandable --Scotteh 14:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cartel interview

So how is it that the Highwire Daze interview is deleted yet another one still stands? Is that other interview not "Spam" as well or perhaps it is from your own personal website? I am reinserting the Cartel interview from Highwire Daze as it is more recent than the other interview you have kindly left on. There is news from the Warped Tour as well as comments about what could be their forthcoming album. Citing a current interview as a "spam warning" is ridiculous when you let another stand.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kenmorton (talk • contribs) .

Ahem

Please don't ever talk to me or monitor my activity again. Evan Reyes 19:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. Interviews on bands should be perfectly okay to go up on their Wikipedia pages. Quit being so anal about yours. And quit monitoring my activity as well. In short - get a life! Ken Morton 9:00, 18 August 2006

I'm not monitoring anybody's activity. Please see WP:STALK on what is allowed and what is not (your "Get a life"-comment is most certainly not). But if I return to a talk page I have recently left a comment on and find it blanked, I revert it. That's Wikipedia policy, sorry. And about the interview links, Ken, please see WP:EL#Links_normally_to_be_avoided, especially §3, as you are not to post your links. If you continue violating WP policies, you are likely to be reported and blocked. --HarryCane 16:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to be less concerned with what other people are choosing to do and more concerned with your own efforts to improve and maintain Wikipedia. It's not your place to police other peoples' pages (or revert, or return to a talk page, or whatever series of words you choose to describe it to make it sound more amicable). If you were an admin or somebody in a position of power, then I might respect your policing. However, I do not believe in vigilante justice, and think that you should really not be wasting your time checking up on me. Evan Reyes 20:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Panic! At The Disco Genre

I would say that a consensus was not agreed upon. Half of the comments on the page were anonymous trolls that said "Panic! At The Disco SuckS! So there not emo", or "Emo sucks, so panic! at the disco is not emo". I would say that nothing there was official, and you have no right to tell any other editor what to put there. I'll just leave it as Alternative Rock with dance influences, but I wouldn't suggest telling other editors what to do. Thanks. --Die Hard 2k5 21:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation at Talk:Panic! at the Disco

Hi - I'm sorry I didn't leave a message here to let you know about the mediation case. It was on my list of things to do last night and I thought I had, but it seems I got distracted.

I assumed you were a party to the mediation, and included you in the process, because I thought you had added the section at the top of the talk page called 'Currently Being Mediated'. In fact, that section was added by Hackajar. He added comments above and below your edit about archiving the genre debate, so it was probably causing confusion for others too. I have tagged it with {{unsigned}} for clarification. Also, I took your name off the mediation case today, and I've asked Hackajar if he wants to continue with mediation – it looks like an consensus has been reached to put it as "Power pop", but all the players may not have weighed in yet.

Again, sorry about the confusion. Have a good weekend – BaseballBaby 02:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"The End of an Anchor" italics

Please forgive me if this is not a proper place to respond to your message, as i have yet to communicate with anyone on wikipedia and don't fully understand how to. My apologies for the italicizing, i was merely attemping to conform the listing to match the italicization of the Vindicated sing mention a few lines above it. thank you very much for informing me of the three revisions rule as i was not aware of it!

the Krayon—The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Krayon (talk • contribs) .

ol and li

I try and skip any with an <ol> on the simple run and do them semi-manually. If you spot any in time, just revert and drop me a note. Rich Farmbrough, 14:45 17 September 2006 (GMT).

Telegraphs in Negative/Mouths Trapped in Static

Have a look at this, and see if you think the complicated numbering system is necessary. Rich Farmbrough, 15:10 17 September 2006 (GMT).

Additional personnel on albums

Hey there - I noticed a while back that you removed some information I put on the ...And the Battle Begun page. I'm not sure the reasoning for the removal, as all of the information was factual, and perhaps instead cleaning it up or whatnot. I feel that the information is important to people who are fans of the band, as Rx Bandits has a following that seems to bleed over into similar or related work, i.e. that of the producers and artists working on the record. I asked over at the WP:Albums Project and they seemed to agree that including information like this was a personal preference, but if someone had taken the time to add it, they would normally leave it. Anyhow, I just wanted to hear your opinion. Shuckiduck 07:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rob Freeman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rob Freeman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok ☠ 01:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...

Please never contact me again in any way, regardless of any edits I may make. I have absolutely zero interest in what you have to say. Evan Reyes 21:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tough luck if you have a personal aversion against me. However, it won't stop me from informing users if they breach Wikipedia policies. Sorry. --HarryCane 11:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

theAUDITION

is there a reason you deleted the band background for this article? I understand the copyright issues with the images, but not things like history—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nick.dilallo@gmail.com (talk • contribs) .

If the material is copied from the official website, it's still a copyright violation. Copyright laws apply to text just as they do to images. --HarryCane 11:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My fault-- I didn't know it had been copied from the website. Thanks for clarifying. Nick.dilallo@gmail.com 18:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More replaceable fair use images

—Chowbok ☠ 03:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your edits to The All-American Rejects

Why did you remove the genre of Pop punk? As far as I am concerned, they are quite pop punk. Google also finds significant use for this:

Results 1 - 10 of about 562,000 for All-American Rejects pop punk. (0.10 seconds)

Please consider this. Meanwhile, I am re-adding the genre. ► Adriaan90 ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ 17:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, see their Last.fm profile. Cheers. ► Adriaan90 ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ 17:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Starting Line

I have again removed sing365 from this page per WP:EL. This site uses submissions only (nothing original) to augment its advertising and cannot be linked from Wikipedia. Please write me if you have any questions. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 14:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That should do, thank you. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 14:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Something Corporate

I replied on my talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. By the way, I've put some thoughts together at User:Quadell/non-free photos of bands. If you have an opinion and want to weigh in, I'd value your input. All the best, – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 20:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Eat World

Hey I see you added the bonus tracks and import versions etc. for Jimmy Eat Worlds "Futures" album. I was just wondering, where did you get the information on the 6 bonus Japanese deluxe tracks? I'm trying to track album down to purchase online, but can't seem to find it. Any help would be much appreciated —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.238.84.108 (talk • contribs) 09:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I ordered my copy from Amazon Japan. It's quite expensive to order it including international shipping, but I found it well worth the money. Here are two links to online retailers that carry the CD: Amazon and HMV. And even though it lists 14 traks on both CDs, the second disc has 17 (as in the Futures (album) article). --HarryCane 17:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thank you so much! I will buy this from Amazon jp. Also, perhaps you should mention the track listing (14 instead of 17 on Amazon) on the Futures (album) article. It may help more people trying to find this album. Thanks again! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.236.178.190 (talk • contribs).

Senses Fail

I personally think it has to do with the article, its the same as putting the bestbuy bounus tracks. So i think then the bestbuy tracks should be erased, also someone else uploaded it again. thus proving it should be part of the article. its not saying its part of the cd, simply showing the b-side info.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xtbs7645x (talk • contribs).

They were listed as b-sides and not as 17-19. How exactly would that confuse people? They were recorded during the recording of the cd, if you look at many band pages. The b-sides are listed, what makes this diffrent? I think this should be part of the article and if you chose to be a "bad" person and erase it thats your problem. Also that was not me who posted it, i wouldn't hide behind an IP address.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xtbs7645x (talk • contribs).

Jack's Mannequin

They haven't been released on an album, which makes them non-album tracks. CJMylentz 07:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those very recordings haven't, true that. But all these songs are on Everything in Transit. See other band articles (Something Corporate, The Starting Line, New Found Glory, hellogoodbye, etc.), which never list demos, live recordings or unreleased music among their non-album track sections. Take it easy. --HarryCane 13:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, don't ask me to "take it easy". Second, if it is a different song then what it is on the album, doesn't that make it a "non-album" track? I might not be a rocket scientist, but I do understand words. CJMylentz 10:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, alright. First off, I didn't mean "Take it easy" in a harmful way whatsoever. More in a "Take care"/"Keep it up" kinda way, so there's no need to get worked up about it. Anyway. Second, I had this very discussion over "non-album tracks" at Talk:The Starting Line. It's simply impractical to list every recording ever done of album tracks within "Non-album tracks" sections. Because if you list this recording — which was never officially released with the backing of his label (only in horrendous quality on a website) — why not list every single bootleg recording and YouTube video of this and any other song McMahon has played at Jack's Mannequin shows? And if not, then there's the question of where to draw the line for what goes in there and what does not. Judging by the quality of the recording? By the person who recorded it? If you start listing different versions of album tracks under "Non-album tracks", that makes for incredibly long and incoherent lists, containing loads of items most people wouldn't consider non-album tracks per se. Third, I really don't know where this all is suddenly coming from, a whole month after the initial issue arose. --HarryCane 12:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't appreciate you telling me to calm down. Four tracks were released off the Jack's Mannequin website. I'd say that that's pretty damn close to an official release. I'd appreciate it if you didn't make any changes on the article in regards to these four tracks. CJMylentz 22:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate if you didn't forbid me to make edits in a free encyclopedia. I'd also appreciate if your reply addressed at least one argument I was making that those songs are not "non-album tracks" — especially in regards to consistency with other articles, for which I gave more than sufficient examples. The problem is, "pretty damn close to an official release" is still not an official release (most importantly because the songs were online for how long, two weeks?). And I'm saying "calm down", because this argument is the most ridiculous thing to get angry, personal or defensive about. But if we can't settle this like two adults, this issue should be translocated to Talk:Jack's Mannequin. --HarryCane 23:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The four songs released back in December was actually an official release given by the tour manager, Casper Johnson. It was actually called the Holiday EP. In case you guys didn't know. One of them was actually already released on the JM secret site. - Guest—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.47.4.236 (talk • contribs).

Removal of table in Hellogoodbye

Hi, why did you remove the table? Fair use still applies since they are low-quality and "solely ... illustrate the audio recording in question". -Halo 13:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, looks like you did the right thing in according to WikiProject Music. I'm going to annoy a few people there about it, since I'm not convinced about it. Sorry to annoy you. -Halo 14:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infinity On High

Perfect job fixing up the page, I was just working on doing roughly the same thing. You beat me to it, but yours looks better. --DJREJECTED 13:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Glad I could help! --HarryCane 16:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infinity On High

i'm new to the editing side of wikipedia, but enjoy it's usefulness every day. wanted to know why infinity on high isn't unprotected yet. is there still vandalism since the official release? i would just like to see more approved professional reviews in the review section. i feel as if each album in wikipedia should provide readers with a number of different reviews, links included, maybe 7-10 different ones. if i can't edit the page to do this, maybe you, or someone with permission could. i understand the sputnik.com review was removed because it is not included in the list of approved review material. i also noticed that i was not a favorable review. coincidence? i really enjoy the album, but the review section should be impartial and balanced. maybe the list of review sites that can be used should be added to. i know nothing of sputnik, but i noticed that neither spin magazine, blender, nor entertainment weekly are included in the list. also omitted are the LA times and the NY times. maybe even Q magazine or Mojo magazine. viable sources no? -Justus0 2:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Senses Fail

Hi, I've seen you frequently around the article Senses Fail and other related articles. Please consider joining WikiProject Senses Fail, an effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage and detail regarding Senses Fail.

If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks that you can help with. Thank you for your time.

Hidden in Plain View

Regarding your reversion of my "otheruses": I was going to create a redirect page, since the book Hidden in Plain View is the primary source (and perhaps the only source) of the theory that quilts played a role in the Underground Railroad. It is more likely that a user would search for "Hidden in Plain View" than "Quilts of the Underground Railroad", which is why I put the tag at that article.

If "otheruses" isn't appropriate, should I set up a disambiguation page instead? Do you have any other suggestions? Thanks. — Malik Shabazz | Talk 17:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That's very helpful. — Malik Shabazz | Talk 18:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Phrase that Pays

Thanks for you fix on that article. Would you be able to source the article as well? I'm not quite familiar enough to do the research with any efficiency. --Auto^{(talk / contribs)} 20:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TSL rock genre

I think the genre "Rock" is redundant for the make yourself at home EP, because it is acoustic, and thus is acoustic rock and pop punk, so Rock is not needed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.38.71.76 (talk • contribs).

Regarding edits to Number One Gun

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, HarryCane! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bpurevolume\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gallows

I've reverted your change. It doesn't seem reasonable to have an article on a minor UK band being the main root of an article tree when other uses are so much better known (even if one might wish them not to be :-(). Linuxlad 19:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know the band, and I totally agree that the "Gallows" page should definitely either be a disambiguation page or link to the Gallows (Execution) article. However, the comment atop the article does not at all belong there, but on the talk page at best. You could also just move the pages yourself (if possible, maybe you'd need an administrator to do it) instead of listing what should be done. Anyway, if you need help move the articles/creating a disambig page, I'll gladly help, but the comment cannot stay in the Gallows article. --HarryCane 10:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to agree on what needs doing - I placed the comment (clearly temporary) because it was not clear to me that the imposed article just titled gallows and the article under gallows (band) were entirely the same - if you dislike my intermediate position I leave you to make the required edits. Bob aka Linuxlad 12:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hellogoodbye 2004 Promo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hellogoodbye 2004 Promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Based On A True Story.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Based On A True Story.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Fenix_TX-Lechuza.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fenix_TX-Lechuza.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Hellogoodbye_OMG_DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hellogoodbye_OMG_DVD.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ready... Break

i saw u edited this page, do u have a copy of this album?

Image:Fenix TX Promo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fenix TX Promo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 02:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CuteIsWhatWeAimFor.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CuteIsWhatWeAimFor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:W Tell.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:W Tell.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halifax_2006_Promo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Halifax_2006_Promo.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 15:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Houston_Calls.jpg

I have tagged Image:Houston_Calls.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 20:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hidden_in_Plain_View.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hidden_in_Plain_View.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 16:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boys Like Girls

Ok about indie rock..but there is somethig indipendent about their music and they've mixed many styles to make their own. Indie pop maybe? (I'm not very sure about this indie thing...but from what I know I think their music is indie..and since indie pop is a genre...) I just want to be accurate in the article because just pop rock doesn't represent fully their music style. Please answer in my talk page. Bye :] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xr 1 (talk • contribs) 11:42, August 26, 2007 (UTC) Xr 1 09:13, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Emanuel Promo.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Emanuel Promo.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn 19:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:All Time Low promo.jpg as well. - Ricky81682 (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hellogoodbye_OMG_DVD.jpg

I have tagged Image:Hellogoodbye_OMG_DVD.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Seraphim ^Whipp 12:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Happy_Holiday_From_Drive-Thru.gif

I have tagged Image:Happy_Holiday_From_Drive-Thru.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Seraphim ^Whipp 12:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:New Found Glory From The Screen To Your Stereo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:New Found Glory From The Screen To Your Stereo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Mae Promo.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mae Promo.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Haemo 21:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All Music Guide

I've noticed on the All American Rejects page you spoke out against using all music guide as a genre source, as it listed the band as indie rock. Please voice your opinion here[7], there is a debate going on over whether AMG should be used as a genre source.Hoponpop69 (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:David Melillo.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:David Melillo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 16:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:New Found Glory Nothing Gold Can Stay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:New Found Glory Nothing Gold Can Stay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:New Found Glory album.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:New Found Glory album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Something Corporate Live at the Fillmore Theatre.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Something Corporate Live at the Fillmore Theatre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Straylight Run CD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Straylight Run CD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Academy EP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Academy EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Academy Is Almost Here.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Academy Is Almost Here.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Andrew McMahon demo CD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrew McMahon demo CD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Butch Walker-Heartwork.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Butch Walker-Heartwork.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Butch Walker-Letters.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Butch Walker-Letters.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Butch Walker-Live At Budokan.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Butch Walker-Live At Budokan.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Denver Harbor-Extended Play.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Denver Harbor-Extended Play.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fenixtx-album.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fenixtx-album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JamisonParker-Sleepwalker.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JamisonParker-Sleepwalker.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Galaxy Sessions

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Galaxy Sessions, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Galaxy Sessions. Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Boys Like Girls promo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Boys Like Girls promo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Butch Walker.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Butch Walker.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 01:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jacks mannequin holiday single.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jacks mannequin holiday single.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Denver Harbor Promo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Denver Harbor Promo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 20:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Listen To Bob Dylan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Listen To Bob Dylan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew McMahon (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Andrew McMahon (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

harrycane - sit the fuck down and stop being such a prick about articles no one reads.

Sing_The_Body_Electric_Promo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sing_The_Body_Electric_Promo.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fenix TX 2001.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fenix TX 2001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fenix TX 1999.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fenix TX 1999.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --14:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sampler Volume 2

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sampler Volume 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Houston Calls-4 Song Sampler.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Houston Calls-4 Song Sampler.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Houston Calls-Sampler Volume 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Houston Calls-Sampler Volume 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The Early November I Am The Avalanche Split.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Early November I Am The Avalanche Split.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Something Corporate Live at the Fillmore Theatre.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Something Corporate Live at the Fillmore Theatre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello HarryCane! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 291 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Rob Freeman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Allister.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Allister.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Solid State Survivor (talk) 05:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fenix_TX_1999.jpg

I have tagged File:Fenix_TX_1999.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 06:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fenix_TX_2001.jpg

I have tagged File:Fenix_TX_2001.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 06:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PanicAtTheDisco-LiveSessionEP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PanicAtTheDisco-LiveSessionEP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Remember Maine CD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remember Maine CD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Houston Calls-A Collection Of Short Stories.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Houston Calls-A Collection Of Short Stories.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hidden in Plain View EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hidden in Plain View EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hidden in Plain View Find EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hidden in Plain View Find EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hidden in Plain View Operation Cut-Throat EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hidden in Plain View Operation Cut-Throat EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waking Ashland Composure.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waking Ashland Composure.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waking Ashland I Am for You.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waking Ashland I Am for You.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waking Ashland Telescopes US.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waking Ashland Telescopes US.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waking Ashland Telescopes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waking Ashland Telescopes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DaveMelillo TalkIsCheap.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DaveMelillo TalkIsCheap.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Halifax A Writers Reference.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halifax A Writers Reference.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Halifax AWritersReference 2005.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halifax AWritersReference 2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Halifax Start Back At Start.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halifax Start Back At Start.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Self Against City TIHYWI EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Self Against City TIHYWI EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SelfAgainstCity-TellingSecrets.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SelfAgainstCity-TellingSecrets.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JamisonParker-Notes & Photographs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JamisonParker-Notes & Photographs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emanuel Soundtrack To A Headrush.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emanuel Soundtrack To A Headrush.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Notes & Photographs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notes & Photographs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notes & Photographs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:JamisonParker albums

A tag has been placed on Category:JamisonParker albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SayNoMore-StrangerInDreams.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SayNoMore-StrangerInDreams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SayNoMore-TheTransition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SayNoMore-TheTransition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:All Time Low Put Up or Shut.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All Time Low Put Up or Shut.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Drive-Thru Welcome To The Family.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Drive-Thru Welcome To The Family.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]