Jump to content

User talk:GreatLakesShips/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, GreatLakesShips, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 11:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

The last ref you added pointed to a non-existent web-site. Please can you check the source and, if possible, format the reference as I have done to the only viable reference in the article. Thanks  Velella  Velella Talk   12:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

A whaleback for you!

Whaleback
Always good to see another Great Lakes history editor! Happy editing! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for all your great work so far! I don't know if you've seen it yet, but the Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors page has some good things to keep in mind whilst you're working on Wikipedia articles as a younger editor. Thanks again, and keep up the great work! --Jack Frost (talk) 23:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Willis L. King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifeboat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

SS Thomas F. Cole

The Cole was built for Pittsburgh Steamship Company then sold to US Steel in 1952? But isn't PSC the subsidiary of USS that operated the Steel Trust's Great Lakes fleet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romen021 (talkcontribs) 22:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ira H Owen (shipwreck) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Presque Isle
Superior Shipbuilding Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to East Coast

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Good work

...on the articles that you have written. You have put forth good effort.

I notice from your userpage that you have created several accounts such as MaritimeWolf and BenderIsGreat1913. Why? Are you not able to do the work with one account? It is good to see that you have them linked as required by WP:VALIDALT, "Alternative accounts should always be identified as such on their user pages, except where doing so would defeat the point of the account."
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, GLS, and welcome! Nice job on this article. It's hard to believe that you are only 13.

I made a couple of changes to the article, which I explained on the talk page. The errors in the source I deleted are very common, and we should be suspicious of sources which confuse GT, GRT, NT, or NRT with displacement. They often also confuse draft (draught) with depth, which also seems to have happened here.

Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 22:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Autpatrolled user right

Hi GreatLakesShips, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Mjroots (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC) Mjroots (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Other account

I notice that sometimes there is an editor, LittleGreenLights that is adding images to articles that you have written. Would you happen to know them? Nthep has been trying to communicate with them on their talk page so that he may help them but they haven't ever responded.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Is there some reason why you aren't answering me?
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

LittleGreenLights is  Technically indistinguishable to GreatLakesShips. Please explain.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

  • I now see this in a subpage although you still haven't answered me directly. I have known since March 12 and have been very patient with you. I've converted your block to 72 hours. Uploading copyright photos is wrong. Which photos do we need to scrutinize? All of those uploaded by LittleGreenLights? Will we find copyvio text? Pinging Diannaa since we will need more eyes on your contribs.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Until we get certain issues cleared up, you are blocked indefinitely. Issue #1 - communicating with other editors and particularly admins. I want to hear about how you are going to improve on that. Trying to get you to account for this has taken quite a while. We're not going to go through that again if there happens to be other issues in the future. Issue #2 - WP:SOCK - please explain what you have already done and also whether you have any more accounts. Issue #3 - WP:COPYVIO and your cooperation concerning cleanup will go a long way towards being unblocked. Please feel free to file an unblock request per the guide.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

GreatLakesShips (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand the reason for my block. I created a separate account to upload photos to Wikipedia because I was scared that if I accidentally uploaded a copyrighted photo I would get blocked. I understand that this was wrong. All I was trying to do was improve the articles I added the photos to. I promise that I will not do violation editing anymore.

Accept reason:

Unblocked. I'm satisfied with your answers and I will extend trust to you that you won't go down that path again. The Wikipedia community can be very forgiving but repeated behavioral issues are dealt with more sternly. You will do better seeking help because making mistakes is understandable and somewhat expected and you can learn from others. Trying to hide mistakes or deceiving others to do so will cheat both you and the community in the long run. I think you could have a bright future as a Wikipedian and look forward to reading more of your articles.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 22:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

From know on I will reply to messages that are important (the reason why I didn't reply to you is because I was scared). Using the LittleGreenLights, I only uploaded photos, and edited but hardly ever. When I received your message about being blocked, I created the account GreatLalesShips2 (I misspelled the name) to reply to you but it didn't work. If the images I uploaded are copyrighted, that is because I misunderstood the license. Otherwise I try to upload copyright free images. GreatLakesShips (talk) 20:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

I am checking the images listed at Special:ListFiles/LittleGreenLights and so far they are public domain photos from the LoC. Incorrectly tagged but public domain. I will do the rest later — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Nthep tagged them, not me. I did tag them, not Nthep. I just remembered wrong. But thank you for looking and sorting then out. GreatLakesShips (talk) 20:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Okay, for reviewing admins' benefit, the thread at the top of your talk page was the first time that I asked and the next time that I asked was at my talk page. I next posted twice with this question in this thread on different days. I received this response from you or your father? After seeing that you hadn't replied but had edited, I placed the CU results above which prompted your reply on my talk. That's the timeline.
Are these accounts (GreatLakesShips, LittleGreenLights, GreatLalesShips2, BenderIsGreat1913 and MaritimeWolf) your first Wikimedia accounts? (Also, do you have other) Accounts at the Hungarian Wikipedia? From your userpage, you have high proficiency in that language.
Why didn't you respond to Nthep with the other account, (LittleGreenLights)? He was trying to help you.
The only thing that held me back from giving you a barnstar was the fact that there was an account, (LittleGreenLights), that you wouldn't own as yours. Otherwise, the work looks commendable.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Which accounts do you mean? If that is not a stupid question. GreatLakesShips (talk) 22:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

I've amended my previous post and clarified in green. Apologies for not being clearer.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 01:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Apologies for a late reply. But you were asking me if I had a Hungarian Wikipedia account. I never created a Hungarian Wikipedia account, but while logged into my English Wikipedia account, I visited the Hungarian site. My username appeared in red on the page, I don't know much about this, so if that means I have an account, I have one. But I never created a Hungarian account so I'm assuming that means that I don't have one. GreatLakesShips (talk) 14:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Did you have any accounts prior to creating GreatLakesShips?
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

No I didn't. GreatLakesShips (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much, I'm truly grateful. GreatLakesShips (talk) 05:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Choctaw

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Choctaw you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1.02 editor -- 1.02 editor (talk) 09:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Essex

Hello again GLS. This is a good article. Do you really wish to delete it? Kablammo (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Brad101 said it was a duplicate of another article. What do you think? Should I merge the existing article with it?

GreatLakesShips (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

I did not know that. Edit the existing article. Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks.

GreatLakesShips (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of SS Lakeland

Hello! Your submission of SS Lakeland at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

It has been over a month since the initial review, and 19 days since the above was posted. I see that you have made some edits to the article, but you haven't yet made any posts to the DYK nomination page, which you really need to do very soon if you wish to continue pursuing this nomination. I do hope we see you posting there about your progress in dealing with the issues raised at the nomination, even if you're still working on them. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi GreatLakesShips, Why did you revert my edits? First, the vessel was apparently launched in 1866, so why did you change the category to 1886 ship? Second, the first paragraph recapitulates the title. Third, the launch year is implicit, and should be explicit as it makes it unnecessary to subtract 47 from 1913 to figure it out. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

No worries, not wrong. Just a question of how do we make things simple and clear, and mileages differ between editors. As for the 1913, typos are just what I do best. Acad Ronin (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Just checked out your User page. Welcome to WP, and to ships. You are off to a great start. (Just don't get sucked in to this hobby as I have been.) Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 14:43, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for SS Ohio (1875)

On 25 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Ohio (1875), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the wreck of the Ohio was discovered 122 years after her sinking? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Ohio (1875). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Ohio (1875)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Choctaw

The article SS Choctaw you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Choctaw for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1.02 editor -- 1.02 editor (talk) 01:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

A goat for you!

great job on ships

Darkunicorn321 (talk) 22:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for SS Lakeland

On 16 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Lakeland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while the freighter Lakeland was sinking on Lake Michigan, her captain allegedly refused a tow? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Lakeland. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Lakeland), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

I noticed that File:Lakeland sinking.jpg has been nominated for deletion. Copyright laws are perhaps the most difficult thing to handle on Wikipedia. With this image, if we can find who took it, where it was published we can find out how to proceed. If it is a Coast Guard photo, it will be free to use. If we can't find the information it is possible that we could upload it here on Wikipedia as a fair use image. See WP:Copyright and Commons:Copyright rules for further details. Wikipedia:Media copyright questions may also be helpful. Rmhermen (talk) 20:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@Rmhermen: Sorry for a late reply. I have seen that you have edited the file showing the name of its creator which means it can't be used freely. As soon as the file is deleted, I will upload it as a fair use image. GreatLakesShips (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I've nominated this as {{db-nocontent}}, on the basis that it had no content, but merely an attempt to have a page redirecting to two pages. A title can only redirect to one page - if you tried to redirect it to two, how would it know which to go to?

An article with a title "X and Y" would be appropriate only if there is a single entity (such as a work or a company) with this name (e.g. Jack and Jill or Marks and Spencer), or X and Y are notable as a pair (e.g. Gilbert and Sullivan or Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen), in which case the article would describe their collaborative careers or whatever. — Smjg (talk) 10:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

SS Choctaw

I asked Parsecboy about the photos and this is whst he said: no, the licenses are not correct. The photos are all US works, so EU copyright law is completely irrelevant. For us to be able to use the images, we need evidence of publication before 1923. I hope this helps A 10 fireplane (talk) 16:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC) A 10 fireplane (talk) 16:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Choctaw

The article SS Choctaw you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:SS Choctaw for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1.02 editor -- 1.02 editor (talk) 03:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GreatLakesShips. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (SS Selah Chamberlain) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating SS Selah Chamberlain.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hiya, Nice work, fantastic article! Thoroughly enjoyed reading your work. Just moved the image so the text wasn't so crammed.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS J.M. Allmendinger, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages White Lake and Sundries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Great Lakes shipwrecks on the National Register of Historic Places, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sand Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

SS Choctaw

Hi,

My name is Dan, and I've been trying to correct some erroneous information in the SS Choctaw article. While I realize that your edits are based on published material, I believe I have better first-hand knowledge of the current state of the wreck than TBNMS does, based on many hours of video and sonar, both remote-operated and diver-operated.

I just looked briefly at the article and noted a number of erroneous changes. I'll read it carefully and post my findings here.

Cheers!

Michigan Gold Diver (talk) 19:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Michigan Gold Diver

@Michigan Gold Diver: Thank you very much, I'll undo my erroneous edits.

@GreatLakesShips: Thanks for undoing your edit - and thanks for cleaning up all the other details. Looks great! Search YouTube for Choctaw Shipwreck to see video of the wreck. Michigan Gold Diver (talk) 20:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Michigan Gold Diver

@Michigan Gold Diver: Thank you very much!

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Selah Chamberlain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merchants National Bank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for SS Selah Chamberlain

On 6 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Selah Chamberlain, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the freighter Selah Chamberlain sank on Lake Michigan after a collision with another ship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Selah Chamberlain. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Selah Chamberlain), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Hudson (1888), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Kirby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Creating articles

I saw your post at WP:SHIPS. Since you have a lot of experience creating articles, I recommend you skip the AFC process and just create and post them. I usually work on the article in my sandbox, search for the title, create the article by clicking on the redlink, and copy/paste from the sandbox. Usually, within 24 hours somebody will "patrol" the article and add it to the encyclopedia. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 19:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

Thanks for your recent addition to October 18. I've gone ahead and tightened up your addition a bit and added a reference.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Happy holidays! Toddst1 (talk) 17:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of SS Etruria

Hello! Your submission of SS Etruria at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Some additional issues have come to light that need your attention. Please stop by at your earliest convenience. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Unfortunately, your edits did not address the close paraphrasing that is a major problem with the NRHP material. This will need to be addressed; please see the nomination page for further information. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:21, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset:, sorry, I have been a bit busy lately, but I will resolve it as soon as possible.

Whalebacks

Hello My friend! It seems that as your interests are the same as mine, you could help me with this project. I'm trying to make an article for every Whaleback ship. The list of all Whalebacks is hard to find on the internet, but I found the book Whalebacks by Neel Zoss. That has a list of all of them that I can post if you need me to. Will you help me with this project? Bowtiesarecool06 (talk) 19:58, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Why Not Both?

I think a list should be made on the Whaleback page, but each ship should have their own article. I can make the list as long as you are able to help me make a couple of the articles and/or expand on some of the lacking articles that already exist. Bowtiesarecool06 (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

@Bowtiesarecool06: I think it is definitely possible, but it would take quite a long time. GreatLakesShips (talk) 20:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

That's true, but the process will be sped up significantly as with the book we will actually know what ships need articles. I'll go make the list now. Bowtiesarecool06 (talk) 21:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS S.R. Kirby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gunilda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Germanic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Template:NRHP Lake Superior requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of SS Pere Marquette 18

Hello! Your submission of SS Pere Marquette 18 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of SS S.R. Kirby

Hello! Your submission of SS S.R. Kirby at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Choctaw

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Choctaw you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 07:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Choctaw

The article SS Choctaw you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Choctaw for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 06:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for SS Pere Marquette 18

On 8 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Pere Marquette 18, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the wreck of the train ferry Pere Marquette 18 (pictured) was discovered in Lake Michigan 109 years after she sank? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Pere Marquette 18. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Pere Marquette 18), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Choctaw

The article SS Choctaw you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:SS Choctaw for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Your articles are really good (and you have created 69 of them? nice). jp×g 21:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@JPxG: Thank you very much! This is much appreciated. GreatLakesShips (talk) 21:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for SS Russia

On 12 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Russia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the wreck of the freighter SS Russia was discovered in 2019, only 1,200 feet (370 m) from where a different shipwreck hunter ended the search for her years earlier? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Russia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Russia), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Gunilda

On 14 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gunilda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Cousteau Society visited the wreck of the yacht Gunilda in Lake Superior in 1980, calling it "the most beautiful shipwreck in the world"? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gunilda), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for SS S.R. Kirby

On 17 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS S.R. Kirby, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 825 feet (251 m) of water, the composite-hulled bulk carrier S.R. Kirby (pictured) is one of the deepest shipwrecks ever discovered in the Great Lakes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS S.R. Kirby. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS S.R. Kirby), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Wug·a·po·des 00:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations! With 21,375 views, your S.R. Kirby hook is currently the most viewed hook for the month of December. Accordingly, it has been included at DYKSTATS December. Keep up the good work! Cbl62 (talk) 19:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
@Cbl62: Thanks very much! Have a nice day. GreatLakesShips (talk) 19:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
You're welcome. And nice work on the SS Pere Marquette hook as well. With 13,825 views in a 12-hour queue (1,152 views per hour!), that one performed terrifically as well. Cbl62 (talk) 19:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Working my way through the December hooks, and I see that Gunilda is yours as well. That's three hooks on DYKSTATS December within a couple of weeks. And Gunilda did it without being a lead/photo hook and being posted in a 12-hour queue. Very impressive! Cbl62 (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Holy smokes! SS Russia too. That may be a record. Cbl62 (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
@Cbl62: That I did not expect. Thanks for telling me! GreatLakesShips (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Jarvis Lord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helm.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of SS Choctaw

Hello! Your submission of SS Choctaw at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for SS Choctaw

On 4 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Choctaw, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Choctaw was one of only three semi-whaleback ships ever built? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Choctaw. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Choctaw), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations on more than 9,000 pageviews! However, this doesn't qualify for our monthly list, as it appeared in a 24-hour run and the average pageviews per hour were below our 416.7 views per hour threshold. Best, Yoninah (talk) 11:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Robert C Pringle

Hi GreatLakesShips: I've done a review of Robert C. Pringle (tug) and identified a couple of issues that need sorting before it can be approved. Can you please take a look when you get the chance? Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 13:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for SS Jarvis Lord

On 15 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Jarvis Lord, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the wooden freighter Jarvis Lord was one of the first lake freighters ever built? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Jarvis Lord. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Jarvis Lord), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Russia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Russia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Russia

The article SS Russia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Russia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for SS Vernon

On 19 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Vernon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the wreck of the freighter Vernon is one of the deadliest ever to have occurred in Wisconsin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Vernon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Vernon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Russia

The article SS Russia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Russia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for SS Edward L. Ryerson

On 21 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Edward L. Ryerson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lake freighter Edward L. Ryerson (pictured) is not only the last steam-powered freighter built on the Great Lakes, but also the last built without a self-unloading boom? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Edward L. Ryerson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Edward L. Ryerson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert C. Pringle (tug), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulwark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for SS John V. Moran

On 23 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS John V. Moran, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the freighter John V. Moran and her sister ship were both sunk by ice on Lake Michigan, ten years apart? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS John V. Moran. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS John V. Moran), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert C. Pringle (tug). Unlicensed jurisdiction (talk) 01:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

@Unlicensed jurisdiction: What are you talking about? All I was doing is notifying the reviewers of the article's completion. If you do this to me again, or anyone else (as you already have done), I will report you to an admin. GreatLakesShips (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

A Barn Star for your dedication.

The Ships Barnstar
An impressive body of work, well done. Fishplates (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@Fishplates: Thank you very much. GreatLakesShips (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congratulations! With 12,738 total views (and 1,061 views per hour), your hook on the SS Edward L. Ryerson is the one of most viewed DYK hooks this month. Accordingly, it has been placed in the list at DYKSTATS January. At a personal level, having lived as a youngster on the St. Clair River, I'm enjoying your work on the ships of the Great Lakes. Keep up the great work!

@Cbl62: Thank you very much! It is great to hear. GreatLakesShips (talk) 10:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

SS Choctaw

@Baffle gab1978: Thank you very much. GreatLakesShips (talk) 07:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
No worries; good luck with your planned FA nom. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for 115 (barge)

On 20 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 115 (barge), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the whaleback barge 115 was the last Great Lakes shipwreck of the 1800s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/115 (barge). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 115 (barge)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Robert C. Pringle (tug)

On 21 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert C. Pringle (tug), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the tugboat Robert C. Pringle (pictured) was discovered "remarkably intact" 86 years after it sank? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert C. Pringle (tug). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Robert C. Pringle (tug)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi GreatLakesShips, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! GirthSummit (blether) 12:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

What link??

Ahoy there - I have just received a notice (21 Feb 2021) that your article SS Russia has been linked to an article I created long ago HNoMS Axel Thorsen (1810). I cannot see why such a link should exist. Your ship was launched in 1872, my ship was lost in 1872 - but they never met nor did they operate in the same waters.
Is it just me that is confused? Viking1808 (talk) 15:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

@Viking1808: I suspect it is the "Maritime incidents in 1872" category. GreatLakesShips (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
How strange! but I am a bear of very little brain. Thanks for the reply. Viking1808 (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
@Viking1808: No problem. GreatLakesShips (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations

Your DYK hook about the tugboat Robert C. Pringle and its remarkable preservation after 86 beneath the waters of Lake Michigan, drew 16,221 page views (676 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks so far during the month of February and has earned a place on the Best of February list. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 19:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Jarvis Lord

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Jarvis Lord you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 02:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Vernon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Vernon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Vernon

The article SS Vernon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Vernon for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Vernon

The article SS Vernon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Vernon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS John V. Moran

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS John V. Moran you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS John V. Moran

The article SS John V. Moran you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS John V. Moran for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS John V. Moran

The article SS John V. Moran you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS John V. Moran for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 115 (barge)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 115 (barge) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 115 (barge)

The article 115 (barge) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:115 (barge) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 115 (barge)

The article 115 (barge) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:115 (barge) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 129 (barge)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 129 (barge) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Jarvis Lord

The article SS Jarvis Lord you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Jarvis Lord for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for 129 (barge)

On 14 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 129 (barge), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Barge 129 was sunk on Lake Superior by the ship that was towing her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/129 (barge). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 129 (barge)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 104 (barge)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 104 (barge) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 104 (barge)

The article 104 (barge) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:104 (barge) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 06:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 129 (barge)

The article 129 (barge) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:129 (barge) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 129 (barge)

The article 129 (barge) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:129 (barge) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 104 (barge)

The article 104 (barge) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:104 (barge) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 20:42, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Edward L. Ryerson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Edward L. Ryerson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for 104 (barge)

On 15 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 104 (barge), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the whaleback barge 104 was the first ship of its kind to be lost on the Great Lakes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/104 (barge). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 104 (barge)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Edward L. Ryerson

The article SS Edward L. Ryerson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Edward L. Ryerson for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Edward L. Ryerson

The article SS Edward L. Ryerson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Edward L. Ryerson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations

Your DYK hook about the whaleback 104 (barge) drew 6,214 page views (517 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of March as shown at Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics#March 2021. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Choctaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Choctaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freighter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Ira H. Owen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mast and Lifeboat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SS Ira H. Owen

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Ira H. Owen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:41, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Featured article review for Great Lakes Storm of 1913

I have nominated Great Lakes Storm of 1913 for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 05:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC)