User talk:Gokulakannan SK

Welcome!

Hello, Gokulakannan SK!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gokulakannan SK

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Gokulakannan SK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 02:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gem Television (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gem Television and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gokulakannan SK! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Wikishovel. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gem Television Tamil seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 12:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gokulakannan SK. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Gokulakannan SK. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gokulakannan SK|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to IPDTAMIL.COM, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Gokulakannan SK, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gokulakannan SK|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Wikishovel (talk) 06:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gem Television Tamil moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gem Television Tamil. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gem Television Tamil (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gem Television Tamil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPD Tamil moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to IPD Tamil. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gem Television Tamil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gem Television Tamil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gem Television Tamil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPD Tamil

That is not ready for mainspace, please submit it to AfC instead. DrowssapSMM 18:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IPDTamil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IPDTamil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CoconutOctopus talk 05:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IPDTAMIL.COM

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IPDTAMIL.COM, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 06:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gokulakannan SK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I kindly request for my user account on Wikipedia to be unblocked as I am not a paid or promotional editor. I take great care in verifying my content before publishing it on the platform, and always strive to contribute unbiased and accurate information. My account being blocked prevents me from continuing to share my knowledge and insights with the Wikipedia community. I assure you that I have no intention of violating any policies or guidelines set by Wikipedia, and I am committed to following all the rules and regulations in place. Please consider unblocking my account so that I can continue to contribute to this valuable resource of knowledge. Thank you for your understanding and assistance in this matter.Gokulakannan SK (talk) 06:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not accepted.(this scored 97% likely) We want to hear from you, not a bot, as it's not the bot that blocked, you are. This wouldn't work to get the bot unblocked anyway. Please communicate with us in your own words without using an AI. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One of our "rules and regulations" regards conflict of interest. You should never have been doing any mainspace editing about an organization you founded. Instead, not only did you repeatedly attempt to move a draft to mainspace, you also dodged around create protection via just trying to change the name. Both of these things are completely unacceptable. Since you are committed to following Wikipedia's rules and regulations, do you understand that you may never again attempt to create a mainspace article about "IPD Tamil" or anything or anyone associated with it, and must instead use the draft and articles for creation process? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade: As a contributor to Wikipedia, I fully acknowledge and accept my mistake in writing about an organization that I own. I understand and respect the rules and guidelines of Wikipedia and promise to adhere to them in all my future contributions. I want to assure the community that I have learned from this experience and will make sure to only write about topics that are neutral and verifiable. I apologize for any inconvenience caused and kindly request to be unblocked for further editing. I value the platform of Wikipedia and am committed to using it responsibly for the benefit of all readers. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to correct my mistake and continue contributing positively to this valuable online resource. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 08:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

I'm not interested in talking to a chatbot. If you would like me to even consider unblocking you, please respond in your own words. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconvenience happened again. I'm an independent contributor or writer. I apologize my mistake here by I will not write about organization related to me. Please consider me in unblocking my user account. You can also check out my editing on other top pages too, then will get to know about my contribution. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What would you be interested in editing besides IPD Tamil and subjects related to it? If I unblock you, it would be with the condition that you would not be permitted to edit about those things. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 12:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surely, I will follow your condition. I will make this will not happen again. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 08:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade I will follow the instructions & guidelines given by you and Wikipedia. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 10:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't my question. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade IPD TAMIL is a News Media publisher organization, That's it. Sure, I accept your condition. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 10:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade I'm waiting for your wordings about unblocking my user profile. I promised for your condition. Hope you will consider me. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 12:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you what besides IPD Tamil you would be interested in editing. You have not yet answered that. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 23:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade I would love to edit media related articles besides IPD Tamil, Because I'm a recognized media specialist. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 07:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade Hello, I'm waiting for your valuable actions! Kindly help me. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 11:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping me one more time, and it'll be a final "no". I will get to it when I have the time. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 11:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade Please consider my request, I won't try to edit/create about IPD Tamil and related its topic. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 12:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I intended to consider it, and asked you to stop pinging me. You responded by—pinging me again. So, sorry, that's now a no from me, as Wikipedia is not really a good environment for people who are pushy, impatient, and ignore other editors' requests. But if your unblock request convinces someone else to give you another go, I won't object to them doing it. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade I'm extremely sorry, I don't know about the consideration about me, because I was feared and nervous about the block done on my user account. I'm not a person of pushy, impatient, and ignore other editors' requests. Guide me, what should I do now to get unblocked by you. Please!! Gokulakannan SK (talk) 06:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging someone yet again after being repeatedly told not to is not going to change their mind. You also have avoided directly answering questions given to you, multiple times. My advice is to wait a year and in that time, get to learn the policies so you can answer these questions. If you keep pushing, there's a very good chance someone will revoke your talk page access. If that happens, your chances of ever being unblocked go down considerably. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphimblade Hello! I'm waiting till today for your support! I have realised my mistake daily. It hurts me. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 15:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gokulakannan SK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I done a mistake by publishing removed articles frecuently and i apolglize my mistake. Kindly allow me to edit/contribute. I promise that will not do it again. hope you may understand my concern. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 12:08, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock-auto|2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Gokulakannan SK". The reason given for Gokulakannan SK's block is: "Spam / advertising-only account".|3=‪Seraphimblade‬|4=24618833}}</nowiki>

You were blocked directly. You would not see that message unless you were trying to evade your block y editing while not logged in.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra Can you help to getback my user account. I'm just an media specialist who is willing to contribute articles since 2023. Kindly help me to restore my account. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gem Television

Hello, Gokulakannan SK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gem Television, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gem Tv Tamil

Hello, Gokulakannan SK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gem Tv Tamil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gokulakannan SK. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gokulakannan SK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As your order, I'm requesting an unblock from my original account here. I apologize for making a new account earlier; I couldn't log in to this one at that time. I realize now that creating a second account was against Wikipedia’s rules. My only intention was to edit,add and explore reliable content. I promise to follow all the guidelines properly from now on. I hope you can consider unblocking me. Thankyou for your time. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 10:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You still need to address the reason for your initial block. Please also clarify your status as a "media specialist" and any connection you have to the subject of your edits, see WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 11:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gokulakannan SK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry again for the confusion earlier. I understand now that I should've addressed the block reason better in my previous requests. About my role as a "media specialist," I see how it might’ve raised concerns about a conflict of interest (COI). I just want to clarify that although I work in media, my edits wasn’t meant for promotional purposes but to improve content with reliable, sourced information. I now understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s COI and paid editing guidelines. Going forward, I will avoid editing pages where I have a connection and will suggest edits through the talk pages for review. I really appreciate your time and hope this clears things up. Thank you for your consideration. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 12:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This carefully avoids specific discussion of the conflict of interest and paid editing here. What exactly, specifically is the nature of your relationship with the subjects you've been writing about? Yamla (talk) 12:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gokulakannan SK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for your response, and I'm sorry for not fully addressing the concerns about conflict of interest and paid editing earlier. To clarify, I don’t have a personal connection to the subjects I edited, except for IPD Tamil 24×7, which I made using reliable and sourced information. I’m not paid to edit; I’m just contributing in my free time to edit, create, and explore. The only personal connection I have is my interest in media and technology, which I’m certified in and actively work with.

I understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s COI and paid editing guidelines, and I’ll make sure to avoid editing pages where I have any personal or business connection in the future. I’ll also focus on suggesting edits through talk pages for review.

I hope this helps clarify my position, and I really appreciate your time and consideration. Kindly unblock me with your supervision. Thank you for your understanding. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 12:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:SO, see below. -- asilvering (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You yet again fail to explain the specific nature of your relationship to IPD Tamil 24×7. Additionally, I fail to see how you can honestly claim to have no relationship whatsoever to Gem TV when you personally created their logo and you personally own the copyright to said logo (File:Gem Tv Tamil.png). --Yamla (talk) 12:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your patience, and I sincerely apologize for not providing enough clarity in my previous responses.

In IPD Tamil 24×7: I am the founder of IPD Tamil 24×7, a digital news media company that is registered under MSME and acknowledged by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB), Government of India. I created this platform to contribute to the media landscape by ensuring reliable, verifiable content, and I always include sourced information, including government sources from official websites. I understand that my role as the founder might be viewed as a potential conflict, and I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward.

In Gem TV: I worked as the CTO and head of operations at Gem TV. In 2022, I personally designed the Gem TV logo, and I was a key part of the operations. As a certified comprehensive media and tech specialist, I contributed to the station's overall development. However, I understand that this may raise concerns about a conflict of interest. I assure you that my intent was never to edit the Wikipedia page for promotional purposes.

I am not paid to edit Wikipedia. I edit during my free time as part of my interest in media and technology.I hope this clears up any confusion. Thank you again. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 13:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for admitting you lied when you said the only conflict was around IPD Tamil 24×7. However, I still think you are trying to mislead us. You personally created File:News Tamil 24×7 TV Logo.jpg and own the copyright to that, too. That would mean you also have a conflict of interest with regard to News Tamil 24×7. Looking at the edits from your various accounts, all I see is conflicts of interest. You seem uninterested in writing about anything for which you have no conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your continued attention on my mater. I would like to clarify that I have no personal connection to News Tamil 24×7. I did not create the logo for News Tamil 24×7, nor do I own the copyright to it. I sourced the logo from Google as part of an effort to update the page, and I believe this might have caused some confusion.

as for my edits, I understand that there are concerns about conflicts of interest. I want to assure you that I am committed to following Wikipedia’s guidelines. Regarding the Alien Temple article, I have no direct or personal connection to it either, and I edited it in good faith, aiming to improve the content with reliable information.

I apologize for any misunderstanding and assure you that I am focused on contributing in an honest and compliant manner. Thank you for your consideration. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 13:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I apologize again and again, I accepted my mistake happened by me. I here by acknowledge that I'll be under your supervision, Please consider my request. Thank you in advance for understanding me. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 15:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

We're not going to unblock anyone who needs constant supervision. We're not going to unblock someone who keeps creating sockpuppets to evade their block. We're not going to unblock someone who communicates via chatbot responses when they've already been asked to stop doing that. We're not going to unblock someone who wants to engage in promotional editing. We're not going to unblock someone who doesn't understand why uploading a logo as "own work" means that they've claimed the logo as their own work. This is just not going to happen.

Take the Standard Offer: disappear for six months. Don't make edits, don't create new accounts. Six months from now, try to convince another admin that all those reasons for unblocking you are no longer true. -- asilvering (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering @331dot @Voorts @Yamla Hi, I promise that I'll not try to make any edit or request until 6 months, as you given me a standard offer. Instead of this, I'm going to learn Wikipedia's policies to stable my contributions. Sorry for everything. I'm leaving today. If you still think I was lying about anything, please let me know. I can share my LinkedIn profile for reference to clear any doubts. Thank you again for your time. Gokulakannan SK (talk) 11:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]