User talk:Geysirhead/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Geysirhead. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Geysirhead! Thank you for your contributions. I am Randykitty and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Randykitty (talk) 17:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the cookies, they go well with my black tea!Geysirhead (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Warm Showers
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Warm Showers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VVikingTalkEdits 15:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Draft:Warm Showers is not unambiguously promotional, because Warmshowers.org already reached a certain level of fame, which exceeds the level of fame for hospitality networks with already existing Wikipedia articles. For instance, BeWelcome.org (alexa rank 507,989) with an already existing Wikipedia article BeWelcome has only half of the activity as can be measured on Warmshowers.org (alexa rank 184,760). Geysirhead (talk) 18:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Warm Showers has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
–MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Induction puzzles. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for hint!--Geysirhead (talk) 08:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Algorithmic regulation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facial recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Idiocracy, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. You may also want to review WP:FILMPLOT, as the information you added did not appear to be crucial to understanding the film's narrative. DonIago (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your appreciation of my contributions! My problem is that there are actually some sources proving that Artificial intelligence is an issue in Idiocracy, and especially for its extensive use in gevornment and business. But, these sources are either recreational papers, presentations, blog posts or just comments — no reliable source. The fact that Idiocracy is partially about Artificial Intelligence appears to be so obvious that no serious source tries to prove it. My intention was to interconnect Idiocracy to Artificial Intelligence for those, who have not seen the movie yet. Geysirhead (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your thoughtful response. Unfortunately if it's true that no reliable source has discussed the connection between the film and AI, then as editors we really can't be making the connection ourselves; that would be the textbook definition of OR. I only saw the film once, and it was some time ago, so I'm not sure how helpful I can be here, but perhaps this might help? Good hunting, and please let me know whether there's anything I can do to help! Alternately, you might ask at the article's Talk page to see whether other editors might have better luck tracking down a source. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 20:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government by algorithm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Negative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government by algorithm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Customs and Border Protection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve Tonje Hessen Schei
Hello, Geysirhead,
Thank you for creating Tonje Hessen Schei.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thanks for creating this article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Abishe (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Social machine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algorithmic regulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Cryptocurrency/blockchain standard notice
- David Gerard (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the hint. Is it advisable for me to become an administrator? --Geysirhead (talk) 17:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
Hello, I'm Nyook. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Government by algorithm have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Nyook ✉ 06:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nyook This is not true. There have been subsections with only one sentence each. Add more sentences, and you are welcome to make subsections! --Geysirhead (talk) 06:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, my bad. --Nyook ✉ 06:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Auction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wilson.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC) COooooCK SUSCKER — Preceding unsigned comment added by I like wiki how guys lol 3 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
26 October 2020
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Armenian-controlled territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Please, try to achieve consensus on Talk page before editing. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 08:17, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- The statement is supported by dozens of scientific papers. A consensus is not democracy WP:NOTADEMOCRACY, where unsound arguments like Wikipedia:I just don't like it can negate scientific sources. Multiple editors interested in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict appear to be according to their contributions Wikipedia:Single-purpose_accounts, writing frequently tendentious Wikipedia:NPOV edits, supporting irredentist cause of a certain nation and participating in Talk page by expressing the earlier mentioned unsound arguments. Sorry, this is not a base for consensus.--Geysirhead (talk) 11:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Beshogur (talk) 17:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Nomination of Anita Schjøll Brede for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anita Schjøll Brede is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Schjøll Brede until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose This person has delivered 2 TED-talks. Important figure with connections to billionaires.--Geysirhead (talk) 20:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Some falafel for you!
appreciate your contribution on Eva Chen!! HardeesCharred (talk) 08:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC) |
Page naming
Hey, Could you look into this: Talk:Government_by_algorithm#Page_name --Genetics4good (talk)
The page Category:Irrendentism in the Unites States has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:
Misspelling and there is a category that already exists for this subject
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 16:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for deleting it! I wanted it to be deleted, but did not have any button for it.--Geysirhead (talk) 17:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Category:Armenian-controlled territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh has been nominated for deletion
Category:Armenian-controlled territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Techno-populism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Podemos.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tacit collusion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Mythical utopias has been nominated for merging
Category:Mythical utopias has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Eutopia (disambiguation)
Geysirhead, if a disambiguation page has a primary topic, then that article is listed at the top of the page. If you feel that Eutopia shouldn't be the primary topic, then please begin a discussion on that article's talk page (or the DAB talk page). Leschnei (talk) 23:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Eutopia is an EP. How can an EP be a primary topic?--Geysirhead (talk) 08:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Your recent edit of Third International Theory
Hello, I'm PrimalBlueWolf. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Third_International_Theory seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PrimalBlueWolf (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- @PrimalBlueWolf:. Read the source, before reverting:"...We may note that the doctrines of Wahhabism are an important factor in the development of the complexity which is modern Islam. I have chosen another example for this study, the Libyan Arab Republic (L.A.R.) and its leader since the revolution of September 1st 1969, Mu'ammar al-Kadhdhāfī Here we find a reinterpretation of Islam and an explicit attempt to make this form of Islam the basis of a political ideology, the "Third International Theory". L.A.R. claims to be the model state, the Utopia, of the practical application of this ideology, in its institutions and in its political actions. When the Libyan monarchy was overthrown in the coup d'état of September 1st 1969, the consequences were not only constitutional changes, but a totally new policy, a policy which has been regarded as surprising and abstruse. al-Kadhdhāfī characterized the process of changes as a "cultural revolution", and the world outside noticed at least two features thereof: the application of quranic precepts in ..."[1]
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Works fine!--Geysirhead (talk) 13:06, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Legal status
Template:Legal status has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. fgnievinski (talk) 00:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
January 2022
Hi Geysirhead! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Jezebel several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Jezebel, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Unbh (talk) 17:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article rules apply to everybody.--Geysirhead (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am discussing on the talk pageof the article. You are ignoring WP:BRD and not waiting for consensus before restoring your editsUnbh (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please, read my arguments carefully and reach a concensus with me. I am not ignoring WP:BRD. Your edit summary does not contain a reason. Rules apply to everybody.--Geysirhead (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am reading your arguments. They are not convincing. We haven't found consensus so you need to wait for further input before restoring your additionUnbh (talk) 17:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Move to the talk page of the article! You have already shown by stalking, vandalism and some edit trickery that your goal is not to be convinced and not to improve wikipedia.--Geysirhead (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am reading your arguments. They are not convincing. We haven't found consensus so you need to wait for further input before restoring your additionUnbh (talk) 17:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please, read my arguments carefully and reach a concensus with me. I am not ignoring WP:BRD. Your edit summary does not contain a reason. Rules apply to everybody.--Geysirhead (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am discussing on the talk pageof the article. You are ignoring WP:BRD and not waiting for consensus before restoring your editsUnbh (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:Unbh may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Unbh (talk) 14:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hospitality Club, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Unbh (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Warm Showers. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Unbh (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Unbh. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Warm Showers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Unbh (talk) 15:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Warm Showers. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zippy (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
From the talk page of Unbh
Please stop following me around and undoing my edits. You have done this respectively and without showing good reason, such as when I changed the page for Downfall to correct a mistake. The mistake was genuine- Hitler spoke with a Bavarian accent, not a standard Austrian one, as he grew up in Bavaria from the age of three. His accent was thus very distinctive, as many Germans struggle to comprehend Bavarian even today. The point is, mate, you're a newcomer, and you should learn to respect the changes people like I make, as it's purely out of concern that something is incorrect or needs additional information.--222.153.41.39 (talk) 11:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- @222.153.41.39: you've been reverted, you need to discuss on talk per WP:BRD. the language you are using is not encyclopaedic, and it's not all properly sourced either.Unbh (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
Hello, I'm Antique Rose. An edit that you recently made to John Lennon seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Antique Rose 07:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at John Lennon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
This does not lead anywhere
Please, stop this, read the source of the articles, before you delete everything out blind feeling.--Geysirhead (talk) 15:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Why are you stalking? --Geysirhead (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not stalking. I was editing sites in the category Hospitality exchange services. They all have serious problems.Unbh (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Then discuss them in the talk page, stop edit war. You do not read the sources.--Geysirhead (talk) 15:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not stalking. I was editing sites in the category Hospitality exchange services. They all have serious problems.Unbh (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- "The IRS is not a reliable source to establish notability." What?--Geysirhead (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Stop
Stop creating User:Unbh (or userpages for any other user) unless you can provide evidence that the user in question has specifically requested you do so. It's straightforward harassment for you to be doing this, and there's any more of it you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ‑ Iridescent 17:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, Unbh should stop deleting my warnings on her/his talks site about her/his stalking and edit warring.--Geysirhead (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- No, that is not what I'm saying. Except in a very few exceptional circumstances editors are entirely within their rights to delete comments from their own talkpages; it's taken as evidence of the message having been read. What editors are not allowed to do is to create talkpages in another user's userspace against their wishes, which is what you're doing. If you do it again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ‑ Iridescent 18:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horizon scanning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordis.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Other uses
Hello. It seems you've misunderstood the use of the {{otheruses}} tag. It isn't for marking all the destination pages of a disambiguation page, only for marking a page that actually has that title, where the same title could be understood by readers to refer to a different topic. For example, if the disambiguation page that is currently at DMV were instead located under the title "DMV (disambiguation)" and DMV were the title of an article about one of the subjects listed there, then the {{otheruses}} tag would be appropriate, to lead people looking for a different "DMV" to the disambiguation page.
See WP:HATNOTES for more information.
For the above reasons, I've reverted your addition of such tags for "DMV" to a number of articles. Let me know if you have any questions. Largoplazo (talk) 22:10, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hey @Largoplazo:, you are wrong! You confused {{other uses of}}, which I used, with {{otheruses}}.--Geysirhead (talk) 07:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- OK, but it doesn't matter that there are two templates with similar names that show similar messages. The point is that it's incorrect at the the top of an article titled "German Mathematical Society" or "Deserted medieval village" to have a hatnote that reads For other uses of "DMV", see DMV. The title of the article the reader is looking it isn't itself a use of "DMV", so it doesn't make sense to talk of other uses of it. This doesn't change even when "DMV" is mentioned as an acronym or alternative name in the text. Relative to "DMV", the title of the article is already disambiguated. We don't put disambiguation hatnotes in the articles where the title is already disambiguated, either by being expanded (such as "Deserted medieval village"), or by having a disambiguator in their titles (such as "DMV (rock band)"), or by using the primary name. See WP:NOTAMB. Largoplazo (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, but you are inventing your own rules now. {{other uses of}} is made for polysemic synonyms like DMV of Deserted medieval village.--Geysirhead (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- I am not making up WP:NOTAMB (have you read it yet?) and the point is to put that tag, or similar tags, or tags that serve the same purpose, on the article that has the undisambiguated title that has polysemic synonyms. "German Mathemaatical Society" is not a polysemic synonym, nor is "deserted medieval village". And can you not see for yourself that "For other uses of DMV" makes no sense on top of an article whose title isn't "DMV"? I just don't understand your motivation here—you seem determined to do something that makes no sense. Largoplazo (talk) 15:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- I read WP:NOTAMB, although I did not need to, since they don't apply here. DMV is a polysemic synonym and also an acronym of deserted medieval village. In general, acronyms often are polysemic synonyms and therefore fit the rules of {{other uses of}}.--Geysirhead (talk) 16:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- I am not making up WP:NOTAMB (have you read it yet?) and the point is to put that tag, or similar tags, or tags that serve the same purpose, on the article that has the undisambiguated title that has polysemic synonyms. "German Mathemaatical Society" is not a polysemic synonym, nor is "deserted medieval village". And can you not see for yourself that "For other uses of DMV" makes no sense on top of an article whose title isn't "DMV"? I just don't understand your motivation here—you seem determined to do something that makes no sense. Largoplazo (talk) 15:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, but you are inventing your own rules now. {{other uses of}} is made for polysemic synonyms like DMV of Deserted medieval village.--Geysirhead (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- OK, but it doesn't matter that there are two templates with similar names that show similar messages. The point is that it's incorrect at the the top of an article titled "German Mathematical Society" or "Deserted medieval village" to have a hatnote that reads For other uses of "DMV", see DMV. The title of the article the reader is looking it isn't itself a use of "DMV", so it doesn't make sense to talk of other uses of it. This doesn't change even when "DMV" is mentioned as an acronym or alternative name in the text. Relative to "DMV", the title of the article is already disambiguated. We don't put disambiguation hatnotes in the articles where the title is already disambiguated, either by being expanded (such as "Deserted medieval village"), or by having a disambiguator in their titles (such as "DMV (rock band)"), or by using the primary name. See WP:NOTAMB. Largoplazo (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Hjärpe, Jan (1 August 1976). "Religion and ideology: Mu'ammar al-Kadhdhafi, Islam and the "Third International Theory"". Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis. 9: 56–71. doi:10.30674/scripta.67108. ISSN 2343-4937. Retrieved 25 December 2021.
Nomination of Trustroots for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trustroots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Unbh (talk) 13:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Stalking and Harrassment
Consider this a friendly note but a warning nonetheless. I note you've been pulled up on ANI in January for stalking and edit-warring. You might take my advice and display signs that you learned from that encounter and have changed your conduct. You've started to stalk my edits making snarky comments. We've never crossed paths previously, I tend to operate exclusively at NCORP-related AfDs so I see no reason for your sudden interest in my activities other than to amuse yourself by harassing me. If I see you pop up again I'll open a case at ANI. Fair enough? HighKing++ 19:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- @HighKing: Calm down. I know you can do better. If I see a copy-pasted boilerplate no matter whose in discussions involving me again, I will react. "to amuse yourself" No, I amuse to learn new things and put them into wikipedia, talking to you is exhausting. I am not lying. Look into my two years of contributions before making claims of what I do amuse!--Geysirhead (talk) 12:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
Hi, Geysirhead. I see you make a lot of helpful gnomish edits. Thank you for that. But when you enter into dialogue with people, you far too often speak aggressively to them,[1][2] belittle them,[3] and fail to assume good faith of them, [4]. I have only linked to recent diffs. Sticking in the shortcut WP:LISTEN on the slightest provocation[5][6] is inherently insulting. (Unbh is not failing to listen at Talk:Warm Showers, they are explaining what sources count towards notability, something you seem to have a poor grip on for a two-year-old account.) And don't tell people to calm down.[7] It's extremely rude, especially when they appear perfectly calm. I suggest you have a read of Wikipedia:Civility and pull in your horns. You're not a newbie any more, so a little more adjustment to Wikipedia's policies, guidelines, and culture is expected of you. Bishonen | tålk 13:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC).
- Thank you for appreciating my edits, dear Bishonen! Are you writing WP:NNC notability? If age matters, you are older than me in wikipedia terms, which is a fact. Unbh is a 2 months account, if age matters.--Geysirhead (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Category:Merocracy has been nominated for deletion
Category:Merocracy has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Unbh (talk) 04:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Stop stalking me! Here is the explanation Category talk:Rule by a subset of population--Geysirhead (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
- A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
- A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
- The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
- Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
- The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)
- Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.
- The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
- Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
- The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.
Category:Lounge services has been nominated for deletion
Category:Lounge services has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
- An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.
- Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the
deletelogentry
anddeletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928) - When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)
- Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Opening of proceedings has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
- A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
- A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.
Administrators' newsletter – May 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
- Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
- Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.
- The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
- A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.
- Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.
Administrators' newsletter – June 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
- Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.
- Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
- The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.
- Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
- An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Geysirhead
Thank you for creating Corinna Salander.
User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please add additional independent sources that cover the subject beyond passing mentions.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 16:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Pyrrho the Skipper I have added some of the links to her interviews in independent media and a link to a F.A.Z.-Postcast with participation. Geysirhead (talk) 16:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 19:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Pyrrho the Skipper I'll delete the issues. Geysirhead (talk) 19:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 19:06, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
user_global_editcount
is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)
- An arbitration case regarding conduct in deletion-related editing has been opened.
- The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
Speedy deletion nomination of Trustroots
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Trustroots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Trustroots. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Unbh (talk) 01:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Train Control System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ETC.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
- An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
- An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.
- The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
- Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)
- The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.
- You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
- Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
- Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
Thanks so much
Thanks so much for thanking me for my edit! The user (Unbh) who reverted the dates of rank thing repeatedly due to WP:NOTCV did the right thing. However, having looked through their history of their terse replying on talk pages, I got unnecessarily afraid and troubled about potentially getting into an argument with them. I'm very poor at handling terse, scolding or impatient language, especially terse replies which rarely carry sympathy or kindness in them. I was demoralized that this would end up becoming blanket removals/reverts which could result in heated exchanges on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history talk page.
Your minor gesture has re-energized me. Thank you so much! Here's a cookie!
SuperWIKI has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Thanks for making me feel better!
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
SuperWIKI (talk) 15:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the cookie! Dear @SuperWIKI, you are not the first and unfortunately not the last victim of this special user (Unbh). Geysirhead (talk) 15:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- I don't take it too personally in spite of the demoralization. Objectively, it seems that in spite of Unbh's style, his edit procedure-wise is perfectly correct as far as I know. Thank you again. SuperWIKI (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- "procedure-wise is perfectly correct" means that the user can read and understand English-language literature. I still see examples of opposite. For instance, Talk:Hospitality_Club#HC_is_also_mentioned_as_a_means_for_Islamic_terrorists_travelling_to_countries_with_strict_visa_policies. Geysirhead (talk) 16:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- I don't take it too personally in spite of the demoralization. Objectively, it seems that in spite of Unbh's style, his edit procedure-wise is perfectly correct as far as I know. Thank you again. SuperWIKI (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, and please have another cookie
Thanks for the thanks :-) on my edits on Aspis. GMan552 (talk) 17:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green Imperialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Driessen.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
- A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
- An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.
- The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
- The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please email Madalina Ana.
- An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
- The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.
- The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
- Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Geysirhead. Thank you for creating Pocho (disambiguation). User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the disambig page
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Bruxton (talk) 00:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that if the rationale for a block depends on information that is not available to all administrators, that information should be sent to the Arbitration Committee, a checkuser or an oversighter for action (as applicable, per ArbCom's recent updated guidance) instead of the administrator making the block.
- Following an RfC, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of FoxNews.com is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.
- Community comment on the revised Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines is requested until 8 October.
- The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.
- Remedy 8.1 of the Muhammad images case will be rescinded 1 November following a motion.
- A modification to the deletion RfC remedy in the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been made to reaffirm the independence of the RfC and allow the moderators to split the RfC in two.
- The second phase of the 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review closes 3 October.
- An administrator's account was recently compromised. Administrators are encouraged to check that their passwords are secure, and reminded that ArbCom reserves the right to not restore adminship in cases of poor account security. You can also use two-factor authentication (2FA) to provide an extra level of security.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections open 2 October and close 8 October.
- You are invited to comment on candidates in the 2022 CUOS appointments process.
- An RfC is open to discuss whether to make Vector 2022 the default skin on desktop.
- Tech tip: You can do a fuzzy search of all deleted page titles at Special:Undelete.
Category:Cricket player auction has been nominated for deletion
Category:Cricket player auction has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BoJó | talk UTC 14:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Geysirhead. Thank you for your work on Out-of-the-loop performance problem. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 19:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
- The article creation at scale RfC opened on 3 October and will be open until at least 2 November.
- An RfC is open to discuss having open requests for adminship automatically placed on hold after the seven-day period has elapsed, pending closure or other action by a bureaucrat.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 13 November 2022 until 22 November 2022 to stand in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The arbitration case request titled Athaenara has been resolved by motion.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has entered the proposed decision stage.
- AmandaNP, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee Elections. Xaosflux and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
- The 2022 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of two new CheckUsers.
- You can add yourself to the centralised page listing time zones of administrators.
- Tech tip: Wikimarkup in a block summary is parsed in the notice that the blockee sees. You can use templates with custom options to specify situations like
{{rangeblock|create=yes}}
or{{uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
- Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
- The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
- An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
- A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
- The proposed decision for the 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system is open.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
- A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.
- Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add
/64
to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Geysirhead. Thank you for your work on The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 21:11, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- @SunDawn: Thank you very much for the notice. Geysirhead (talk) 05:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book). Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 00:48, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Orange Mike | Talk 00:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Green_Imperialism AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
- Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.
- Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, CaptainEek, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Primefac, SilkTork.
- The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.
- Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
- Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Administrators' newsletter – February 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
- Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.
- The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.
- The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
- In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
- Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
- Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eight disciplines problem solving, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FMEA.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Why would you merge these? I suggest you restore these edits, as these are technically not the same name in English and the merger was poorly handled, not separating or listing the feminine version of the name in other aspects of the page like the title, wikidata and surname template (which gives less search-ability to the feminine version of the name). PigeonChickenFish (talk) 00:49, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @PigeonChickenFish, I looked into Category:Russian-language surnames before. Males and females are merged there. Ankudinov e.g. Geysirhead (talk) 00:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Geysirhead: There are many examples of surnames people separated by gender here, it has precedent in Category:Russian-language surnames and Category:Azerbaijani-language surnames. Please restore the former categories. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 00:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- There are much more precedents otherwise. Geysirhead (talk) 01:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a matter of opinion and if you disagree, we can have someone else take a look here. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 01:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- It is not an opinion. Females and males are merged in most cases. Geysirhead (talk) 01:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @PigeonChickenFish "not separating or listing the feminine" everywhere else, they are nor separated. Putin (surname) e.g. Geysirhead (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @PigeonChickenFish You confuse surnames with disambiguations! Geysirhead (talk) 01:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @PigeonChickenFish "not separating or listing the feminine" everywhere else, they are nor separated. Putin (surname) e.g. Geysirhead (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- It is not an opinion. Females and males are merged in most cases. Geysirhead (talk) 01:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a matter of opinion and if you disagree, we can have someone else take a look here. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 01:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- There are much more precedents otherwise. Geysirhead (talk) 01:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Geysirhead: There are many examples of surnames people separated by gender here, it has precedent in Category:Russian-language surnames and Category:Azerbaijani-language surnames. Please restore the former categories. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 00:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
@Geysirhead:, I am not confused between the two. It's a mistake that has happened and I will work to find the policy for you since you need confirmation. In the meantime I suggest you start looking too. One reason why we have some names are combined is because there are less WP articles about women in general, and the names get separated when there is enough names to create a standalone article (which is why we have feminine surname as a category for example). PigeonChickenFish (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @PigeonChickenFish "why we have feminine surname as a category for example" This category does not make sense and has to be deleted, especially regarding all the different genders we have now. This Category:Irish-language_feminine_surnames is full whith redirects, does not make any sense. Geysirhead (talk) 18:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Category:Egalitarian communitities has been nominated for deletion
Category:Egalitarian communitities has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Seat of the pants
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Seat of the pants, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 14:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Seat of the pants moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Seat of the pants. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, the template description is not very appropriate here. I moved this to draftspace because the article needs to be expanded more to explain the subject and why it's notable for an encyclopedia article. In its current state it doesn't provide any context beyond a plain definition, and also may be too technical for everyday readers. Thanks. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
Saffar vs Safar
I don't think that having a page on an "Arabic surname" and puting the rest of Safar stuff on the dab page is a successful approach. While the spelling of surnames is easily verifiable, it is not verifiable which people have an Arabic surname as opposed to a different etymology (Peter Safar, for example, is more likely Germanized from the Czech or Hungarian spelling). I would be fine putting all the variations of Safar and Saffar surnames (including diacritical variations such as Šafár, Šáfár, Sáfár, Safár etc) on one page but then it is not an exclusively Arabic surname, it has multiple etymologies. (t · c) buidhe 14:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Buidhe Partitially agree. The arabic Safar/Saffar صفر comes from zero/void/second-month/yellow/brass and starts with an [s]. The East-European Šafář (Czech), Sáfár (Hungarian) and similar are all pronounced with [ʃ] in the beginning. The correct germanized form should have been Peter Schafar. Anyway, I would still separate the disambiguation Safar from Safar (surname) and explain in the surname the two etymologies. Geysirhead (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes the pronunciation is different but diacritics are often dropped in written English so someone looking for someone with the surname "Safar" could mean any of them. (t · c) buidhe 06:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allahverdiyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allahverdi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Ecological imperialism
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ecological imperialism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
@Geysirhead 189.202.94.83 (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Utopian architecture
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Utopian architecture, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Utopian architecture
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Utopian architecture, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
Game theory category
Hello. I see that you've again removed the Game Theory category from the Tragedy of the anticommons page. I'd like to understand your reasoning. I understand that Tragedy of the Commons is in the Game Theory cat, but why does that make the "anti-commons" categorization redundant when the two are separate and distinct theories and arguably not very clearly related. The former is established scientific theory, for which Ostrom was awarded the Nobel Memorial prize. The latter is a far less rigorous and less widely discussed or accepted idea, named to refer to but not to incorporate the former. SPECIFICO talk 22:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- @SPECIFICO: Redundant categories should be avoided to reduce WP:OC. Category:Tragedy of the commons is a topic category, which is entirely within the topic category Category:Game theory. Either "Tragedy of the commons" or "Game theory" is kept as a category for Tragedy of the anticommons, not both. Geysirhead (talk) 08:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I would say that Game Theory should be kept rather than Tragedy of the Commons, which is not really related in substance. SPECIFICO talk 17:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Move
Hi, why did you make this move? Now the title doesn't represent the content Marcelus (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- the previous title was to long, the new title was a mistake. The final title is List of massacres of Poles by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army and reprisals Geysirhead (talk) 19:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- It wasn't "too long", and the new title is still wrong, because it's not a "list of massacres". Marcelus (talk) 19:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- sorry, I added a lead. I would replace it with "List of quantitative estimates of massacred Poles by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army and reprisals" Geysirhead (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wait a moment, the proposed title isn't grammaticaly proper. Just roll it back to the previous title. And start a move discussion to a shorter, yet grammatically proper title. Marcelus (talk) 19:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also a title can be long, there is nothing wrong with that Marcelus (talk) 19:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- sorry, I added a lead. I would replace it with "List of quantitative estimates of massacred Poles by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army and reprisals" Geysirhead (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- It wasn't "too long", and the new title is still wrong, because it's not a "list of massacres". Marcelus (talk) 19:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Political slurs for people has been nominated for discussion
Category:Political slurs for people has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bart Terpstra (talk) 11:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
- The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. (T334338)
- Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. (T337431)
- The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
- The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.
Ways to improve Rail suicide
Hello, Geysirhead,
Thank you for creating Rail suicide.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Some of the analysis provided may be original research or synthesis from appropriately-sourced facts. All potentially contentious claims, including analytical ones, should be sourced. However, I think this is more than good enough for mainspace. Great work!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Actualcpscm (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. It is fixed so far. Geysirhead (talk) 13:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Seat of the pants
Hello, Geysirhead. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seat of the pants, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
- A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment
.
- Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)
- The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus
. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged tonote when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful
.
- Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Your draft article, Draft:Seat of the pants
Hello, Geysirhead. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seat of the pants".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
- The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
- There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
- Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
- Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
- Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
- Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
- Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
- An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
- The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Category:Fictional doomsday scenarios has been nominated for merging
Category:Fictional doomsday scenarios has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
- Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
- Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
- The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Category:Rule by a subset of population has been nominated for discussion
Category:Rule by a subset of population has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SnowFire (talk) 05:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)