User talk:Fortunewriter

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Fortunewriter, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fortunewriter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Inside Out (2015 film), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Chompy Ace 14:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vagabond Dog (video game studio) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vagabond Dog (video game studio), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Award in TompaDompa Talkpage

Pardon me, but I didn't remove any award from his/her talkpage. The reward was archived by ClueBot III [1] Phano Mie (talk) 00:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Fortunewriter! Your additions to Draft:Psychological drama (film genre) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 14:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I never knew I was copyediting once. I'm apologize for this. Fortunewriter (talk) 15:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I add few pages like "List of highest-grossing adult animated films" to make longer. But it's my first time that strike copyright violations for "Psychological drama" page or such. I'm really sorry for not doing that again. Fortunewriter (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. That's alright, as long as you understand! I have tagged the draft so an administrator can hide the initial revision, but you are totally welcome to keep working on it in the meantime. Happy editing. DanCherek (talk) 15:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As always, but thanks :)! Fortunewriter (talk) 15:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nina Aquila: Legal Eagle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nina Aquila: Legal Eagle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Aquila: Legal Eagle. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already request it now because it's my first time to resubmit my second page. Fortunewriter (talk) 18:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree for this nomination. Fortunewriter (talk) 22:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rocketsheep Studio (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCORP. Please provide multiple reliable sources with in-depth coverage about the subject. Passing mentions are not sufficient to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rocketsheep Studio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rocketsheep Studio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Midsommar, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that.

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tremors (1990 film), you may be blocked from editing. Both the genre changes you made and the other information you added to the article weren't supported by sources. Given your prior warnings, I would hope you'd be more careful. DonIago (talk) 23:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Parasite Eve (video game). - FlightTime (open channel) 02:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rocketsheep Studio

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rocketsheep Studio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Power of the Dog (film) into List of accolades received by The Power of the Dog. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 10:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, mate. I was expanding into two pages (film and accolades by film) by my own practice earlier.Fortunewriter (talk) 10:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPLIT

If you split a film article with "(film)" in the title, add "(film)" to the new title. Example: List of accolades received by The Power of the Dog (film) instead of List of accolades received by The Power of the Dog. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I forgot it earlier. Fortunewriter (talk) 00:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages to Draft space

Hello, Fortunewriter,

If you move a page from main space to Draft space, please take a moment to tag the original page for speedy deletion, CSD R2. Twinkle is a helpful tool many editors use to tag pages for deletion and I recommend it. Also, please remember to notify the page creator that you moved the page. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rocketsheep Studio

Hello, Fortunewriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rocketsheep Studio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fading Path

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fading Path, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hospitality of Healer

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hospitality of Healer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vagabond Dog

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vagabond Dog, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Lawmage Academy cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lawmage Academy cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go! I got a license. Fortunewriter (talk) 14:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vagabond Dog

Hello, Fortunewriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vagabond Dog".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I forgot to unlink the disambiguation one from Flee. Of course, you can remove it. Fortunewriter (talk) 07:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of films banned in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abominable.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New page

I was wondering if u could create a List of highest-grossing films based on television series page similar to the List of highest-grossing films based on video games u recently created P+T

92.236.253.249 (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It won't be the same page, but it replicate from "List of films based on video games". I'm not sure if I can create. Fortunewriter (talk) 01:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I started a draft if u want to come and help feel free to 92.236.253.249 (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no problem. Fortunewriter (talk) 09:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avid Liongoren (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft was previously called "Rocketsheep Studio" and declined because it did not show notability for the company. The draft creator rephrased the introduction so as to be about the company's founder, but no notability is shown for him, either. His own website can't be used to show notability. Most of the draft is unchanged since it was declined, and is still about the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Avid Liongoren and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Avid Liongoren, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Century of Birthing

Hello, Fortunewriter,

Thank you for creating Century of Birthing.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This film's website is a primary source and may not be used as a reference. See WP:PRIMARY for guidance. A check of WP:BEFORE (web), WP:BEFORE (news) and WP:BEFORE (books) all show plentiful references. Kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Fortunewriter

Thank you for creating List of highest-grossing films based on video games.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you so much! It was very nice that the page has been reviewed. Fortunewriter (talk) 18:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage pregnancy in fiction moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Teenage pregnancy in fiction, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 14:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Fortunewriter! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Adding the page "Teenage pregnancy in fiction"., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can Your Pet? moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Can Your Pet?, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 10:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4th Crunchyroll Anime Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vinland Saga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of NC-17 rated films, you may be blocked from editing. filmifeed is not a reliable source, quite the opposite, in fact. In addition, the rather detailed information you added isn't mentioned anywhere in the source. bonadea contributions talk 15:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Interview (2000 film)

The article Interview (2000 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews were found pertaining to the actual film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Interview (2000 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interview (2000 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interview (2000 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 05:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

Please stop uploading images that you do not own the copyright to Trade (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry about that. I don't remember where "fair use" copyright is. All of the images are needed for fair use only, but I picked the wrong copyright. Can you redo it? Fortunewriter (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The reason you don't see "fair use" copyright anywhere is because "fair use" images are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons.

'In case, it is possible to redo the license from CC0 into "fair use" again?' No, as i said above. If you want to use fair use images you have to upload them to English Wikipedia and not Wikimedia Commons. Ok? --Trade (talk) 17:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I'll keep that in mind. Fortunewriter (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Forget me not Playstation cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forget me not Playstation cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This

Why? DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 14:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because ButterCashier got blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Sorry about that. I was doing things. Fortunewriter (talk) 14:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional characters featuring teenage pregnancy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of fictional characters featuring teenage pregnancy, is not suitable as written to remain published.

It might be possible to create a list of this kind, but I'm afraid this is not it. Where is the reliable independent sourcing talking about the topic? You got some very good advice at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1155#Adding_the_page_"Teenage_pregnancy_in_fiction". All of that still applies, so please re-read that. Unfortunately it looks like your command of written English is much too weak to write articles; the first paragraphs would need to be completely rewritten because it is frankly hard to understand what they say, and it means that the article scope is very unclear. Even the title of the article is rather nonsensical.

When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move it yourself. bonadea contributions talk 10:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:A Path to Light

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A Path to Light, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Can Your Pet?

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Can Your Pet?, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:South Korean director Byun Hyuk in August 25, 2018.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:South Korean director Byun Hyuk in August 25, 2018.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lawmage Academy cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lawmage Academy cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:43, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians interested in Lars von Trier films

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians interested in Lars von Trier films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:49, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wadanohara and the Great Blue Sea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wadanohara and the Great Blue Sea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wadanohara and the Great Blue Sea (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:27, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry for deleting the speedy deletion, but there's no time to contest for deletion. Fortunewriter (talk) 12:45, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Content Warning Infobox

Template:Content Warning Infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Another Believer _(Talk) 06:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fortunewriter,

Please do not use this template while it is being discussed for deletion. It is not your role, as an editor, to be the morality police and post warnings for readers. For every editor to determine, using their own judgment, what is and isn't acceptable would lead to anarchy. Your role is to improve articles, not warn readers about content they might object to. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:37, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I was testing this CW that much on Wikipedia. Fortunewriter (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Notice Box" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Notice Box and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 18 § Notice Box until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Whpq (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 12:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A number of users have extended you quite a bit of good faith. I doubt they would have done so if they had known that you had previously been blocked as FriendlyTamer (talk · contribs) and had your talkpage access revoked by Yamla with the comment, "You clearly have no understanding [of copyright] and are continuing to place the entire project in jeopardy." As you are evading that block and have continued to have issues on this account, including with copyright, I have blocked this account indefinitely. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 12:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunewriter (talk) 12:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Inteobyu (2000) original movie poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Inteobyu (2000) original movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Can Your Pet?

Hello, Fortunewriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Can Your Pet?".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zara & Erika: A Tale of Annabelle

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zara & Erika: A Tale of Annabelle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zara & Erika: A Tale of Annabelle

Hello, Fortunewriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zara & Erika: A Tale of Annabelle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nina Aquila - Legal Eagle

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nina Aquila - Legal Eagle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nina Aquila - Legal Eagle

Hello, Fortunewriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nina Aquila - Legal Eagle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zsazsa Zaturnnah vs the Amazonistas of Planet X

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zsazsa Zaturnnah vs the Amazonistas of Planet X, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of fictional characters featuring teenage pregnancy

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of fictional characters featuring teenage pregnancy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Experimental video game

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Experimental video game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Experimental video game

Hello, Fortunewriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Experimental video game".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:58, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fading Path

Hello, Fortunewriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fading Path".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Psychological drama television and other works has been nominated for renaming

Category:Psychological drama television and other works has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Depression trilogy

Hello, Fortunewriter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Depression trilogy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Teenage pregnancy in video games has been nominated for merging

Category:Teenage pregnancy in video games has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]