User talk:Serial Number 54129/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Badr Jafar

I saw a report regarding Badr Jafar at WP:BLPN and took it up because the situation seemed unsatisfactory. Some problems were fixed, but then a person who is apparently a representative of the subject attempted to remove certain text from the article, but you restored it (diff). I can understand your edit given that the text apparently has two references, however the situation is not simple. I have restored the text and posted the explanation at Talk:Badr Jafar#Jafar Jafar. I would have waited to ask your opinion but you appear to be on a short break, so I thought I would leave an alert for your consideration on return. Johnuniq (talk) 06:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
4		Eta Uso (talk)						Add sources
7		Henry Cadogan, 4th Earl Cadogan (talk)						Add sources
2		Stephen Gaselee (serjeant-at-law) (talk)						Add sources
3		William Wells (British politician) (talk)						Add sources
2		Edward Ernle (talk)						Add sources
34		Llan (placename) (talk)						Add sources
27		Bundle Brent (talk)						Cleanup
15		Telecommunications in Luxembourg (talk)						Cleanup
285		Lucius (band) (talk)						Cleanup
11,322		Protests against Donald Trump (talk)						Expand
435		Workers' Party of Korea (talk)						Expand
5		Media in Abkhazia (talk)						Expand
88		Hungryhouse (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
7		Colcombe Castle (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
4		Manor of Copleston (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
526		Above & Beyond (band) (talk)						Merge
26		Brunei Currency and Monetary Board (talk)						Merge
18		Workers' Day (talk)						Merge
137		Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (talk)						Wikify
26		Christopher Monck, 2nd Duke of Albemarle (talk)						Wikify
303		Rahama Sadau (talk)						Wikify
6		Goodluck Jonathan Foundation (GJF) (talk)						Orphan
3		Embassy of Saudi Arabia in France (talk)						Orphan
26		Ossai ovie success (talk)						Orphan
138		Tramlink route 3 (talk)						Stub
3		William Henry Hamilton Rogers (talk)						Stub
14		King Henry's Drive tram stop (talk)						Stub
3		Richard Annesley, 3rd Baron Altham (talk)						Stub
3		James Dalrymple-Horn-Elphinstone (talk)						Stub
2		Sir Thomas Miller, 5th Baronet (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1400)

The article English invasion of Scotland (1400) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:English invasion of Scotland (1400) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neville–Neville feud

The article Neville–Neville feud you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Neville–Neville feud for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

What?

Why did you nominatee me for deletion? I've done nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TDMfan23! (talk • contribs) 18:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

@TDMfan23!: Not you, your User Page merely  :) 18:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Ebell

Please refrain from posting idiocy in my Talk page. I am aware of all of it. Adding references that Ebell is a climate warming denier is not defamation, it is responsible and expected Wikipedia editing. BatteryIncluded (talk) 12:54, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

@BatteryIncluded: Please continue to demonstrate your lack of understanding on this talk page. I am an uninvolved editor and uninterested in your own personal 'truth.' If you are indeed 'aware' of all the policies, you will know- because you can read- that the DS notice is merely an alert and, as it says, "does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date." Now that you have read it, you have been alerted to both the discretionary sanctions and the consequences if you run afoul of them at any point in the next twelve months. I know which way my money's going. Cheers  :) _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

BatteryIncluded Thanks for turning your previous remark into a demonstration of something else  :) _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:20, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Please note that I have mentioned your caution about discretionary sanctions at User talk:Bishonen#Myron Ebell. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

User:BatteryIncluded was subsequently blocked for personal attacks. C'est la vie. _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Arm the Homeless

Since you made improvements to Arm the Homeless (its new name, because I moved it to be more standard), do you plan to !vote to Keep it in the deletion discussion? Robert McClenon (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Robert McClenon, I probably should. I see it's been open for over a week with no comments- slightly bizarre! _Muffled ^Pocketed 07:16, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

GA Nominations cont.

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1400)

The article English invasion of Scotland (1400) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:English invasion of Scotland (1400) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 04:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neville–Neville feud

The article Neville–Neville feud you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Neville–Neville feud for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 06:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Many thanks for your attempts at reviewing good articles on the English Wikipedia. However, it appears you have some fundamental misunderstanding as to the nature of the criteria and the role of the reviewer, as has been pointed out by two other seasoned editors: User:Hchc2009 here, and User:BlueMoonset here. I also note a tendency towards mistaking a typo for the non-existance of the word, e.g. here, and even failing, it seems, to recognise 'importanct' as being 'important.' Further, I am forced to point out that you recommend changing a (possibly unclear) sentence to something else- equally unclear. May I suggest, therefore, that you utilise the template {{GA nominee|...|status=2ndopinion}} at some point, sooner rather than later. Obviously I did not expect the articles to pass first time: I do, however, think we need precision and clarity on the precise nature of the changes necessary. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Please elaborate. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: What do you need elaborating? _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

You see that is just a suggestion, you may reword it better. If you feel that the suggestion is not apt, you may voice the same on the review page, but not here. For example, see Talk:Wilbur Dartnell/GA1 and Talk:Jastrebarsko concentration camp/GA1, where the users have respectfully declined my suggestions, and I learnt from them. Please address the issues on the review page, but not here. 2ndopinion is opted when there is complete disagreement between the reviewer and nominator, and the reviewer tends to fail the nomination. I once again prefer to discuss them on the review page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

2ndopinion is opted when there is complete disagreement between the reviewer and nominator - This might be an example of what FIM refers to as some fundamental misunderstanding as to the nature of the criteria. The 2nd opinion is used for far more than what you've described, it is used when a reviewer is unable to complete a part of the review for some reason, it is used when a reviewer is unsure of how to proceed with review for some reason, it is used occassionally when a reviewer who doesn't have a lot of experience would like for someone more experienced then they are to review the reviewer - this may be acceptable the first time around, but, after a few reviews its expected that a GA reviewer will be able to do this themselves without outside assistance. In fact if you'd looked at the criteria and just copy-pasted the definition of a second opinion, you'd have found that your interpretation is incorrect. From GAN/I itself; If you are unsure whether an article meets the good article criteria, you may call for another reviewer or subject expert to provide a second opinion by doing the following. It has little to do with disagreements, but, can of course be used to get outside help for it. I am currently having one of my GA noms reviewed by two editors, an inexperienced one who wants to participate and a highly experienced reviewer who is checking over the review and reviewer themselves. In essence, this is what FIM is asking for themselves. GA reviews are no easy task and an experienced reviewer will see things that most others will completely miss. I see BlueMoonset has added their own comments to the review for the English invasion of Scotland 1400, they are excellent at picking up phrasing and wording problems and have a strong knowledge and understanding of the GA criteria. They're perfectly capable of helping you out on that review. Mr rnddude (talk) 03:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

References

DYK nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1400)

Hello! Your submission of English invasion of Scotland (1400) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Yoninah: _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

• Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting this on my talkpage! It looks like the sock has been put back in the drawer... :-) 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB (talk) 23:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

@'99, no problems- still, at least you know you stand in the pantheon alongside, illustrious colleagues! ;) Cheers for the BS too! _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neville–Neville feud

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Neville–Neville feud you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bonville–Courtenay feud

The article Bonville–Courtenay feud you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bonville–Courtenay feud for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SilverplateDelta -- SilverplateDelta (talk) 16:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of English invasion of Scotland (1400)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article English invasion of Scotland (1400) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

undoing without knowing

Please do not remove my edit when i am mentioning important relatives of his -- important enough for at least one to have his own wikilink. These people are not "peripheral" as you claim. Mawlidman (talk) 09:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

• Fortuna -- you've added a report on Mawlidman, directly below one I entered... Nomoskedasticity (talk) 09:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

User:Nomoskedasticity, I know. Great minds think alike eh. I've deleted it and moved my comment. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:52, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Fake Baronet/Earl

If you are keeping an eye on these aristocracy articles, watch out for Harry James Albert Taylor or Taylor-Berkeley who keeps popping up with various IPs trying to insert himself as a Brisco Baronet, a Musgrave Baronet and even the 9th Earl of Berkeley. JohnCD (talk) 11:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much JohnCD, I saw you revert the Berkely one, and of course the Brisco one I missed totally. I'm sure there are easier ways to get in the House of Lords  ;) Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Update

@JohnCD: > I assume this is the same editor? _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

I'm sure it is, but AFAIK this is the only account he has used; all the baronetcy and earldom claims have been added by IPs. I have replied there. If you want a smile, did you know about the fake London Gazette provided for "Earl Roberts" in 2007? JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Understood. Yeah, I just saw your comment and link over on that page: unbelievable! Unfortunately the link is dead... he obviously didn't keep his subscription for our enjoyment! But the lengths some go to... _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Smoking gun

• @JohnCD: here. Same character. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, he keeps trying. Same account, so not socking. I see he was reverted and given a warning about sources. I don't think it's blockable (yet). I'll watch his contributions (and scan for HJAT from time to time), and give a stronger warning if he persists. JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Custom sig

I'm thinking about testing out a new sig. Since your talk page is at the top of my Watchlist currently, you get the pleasure of being the first to see it. So, what do you think? (personally I can't think of a single problem with it). Mr rnddude (talk) 12:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Dude... --NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

I am kidding Neil, I'm not going to keep it, already back to normal. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

I got that. I should have added a smiley. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Ah, sorry Neil. Honestly that took such an embarrassingly long time to figure out how to do, even longer to hide the date, should have kept it. Wonder how long till people realize that I'm not forgetting to sign, but, hiding it instead. Ah well, I don't think it falls within the acceptable parameters of WP:Customsig. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

This is exactly why I begged you not to become an admin. People take you way too seriously with your admin enforcer hat on. - NQ (talk) 12:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

How can anyone take me seriously when the hat I got looks like this? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Don't you mean this hat? Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 12:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC) [[

Hat on Hut

No, the flower hat is the hat MelanieN gave me along with a crappy T-shirt. She said I always had to wear it or the magic extra buttons wouldn't appear. I've never tested that out though - let me take it off. Hey, wait a minute... MELANIE!!!! --NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Well, you bought it for a good long time. I guess I can't say "April Fool" since it's September. But it really is very becoming, you should continue to wear it. 0;-D --MelanieN (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Re: removal of WP:CRUFT, WP:PROMO, WP:ADVERT, WP:UNSOURCED, WP:NRS and WP:TRAVELGUIDE from Kottayam article

I can't see any reason why you keep on disturbing the article Kottayam. Do you even know where is Kottayam. Well it is a city in Indian state of Kerala. You are simply keeping on reverting the article. You don't even know our culture. Our city Kottayam knows what it needs in it's article. But please stop deleting contents from it. Everything in it was planned and discussed among us Kottayamkar. It may seem as commercial promotion, political or vandalism to you foreigners. But please stop it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thommuvtt (talk • contribs) 10:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Dear Thommuvtt No: you are repeatedly inserting crap, and have been repeatedly asked not to. Please read what Wikipedia is not, and also how everything you wish to add must be neutral in tone and backed up by reference to reliable sources. It would also be a profitable use of your time to familiarise your self with the policy regarding repeatedly reverting edits. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

PS, and please sign your posts and start a new section on new talk-pages. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Well the content is neutral in tone. Please notify me the thing you would like to alter before deleting it on large scale. I will change it if it is needed to be so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thommuvtt (talk • contribs) 10:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Thommuvtt I have already told you what was wrong with the article. Also suggest you read the pages I linked to above. Please do not keep reinserting the dud material; it will be removed, and you may be reported. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

I think you havent told me what was wrong. Sorry for disturbing you. Please mention what was wrong here. I will edit it. Please don't completely delete it from our page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thommuvtt (talk • contribs) 11:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Thommuvtt That is all rather irrelevant now. You are clearly breaching WP:SOCK with your new account, and are using it disruptively to edit-war against three other editors. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thommuvtt. Goodbye. _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your speedy nomination

Done. And then.nn - mass delete is a great tool. I'm tired of these socks, they keep popping up. Doug Weller talk 15:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: thanks very much for the update; I was a little concerned when my original CSD was refuted- I questioned my judgement for a minute. On a lighter note, 'mass delete' sounds fun- a kind of Death Star for the sock rebellion?! Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

It got a reaction from an IP sock who posted something weird on the bottom of my talk page. Yes, it's a really useful tool at times, saves a lot of work. Doug Weller talk 16:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Apologies

Hello! I want to apologize for poaching the article Roly Bain. When I saw the conversation about him at Drmies's talk page, I somehow missed seeing that you had already started a draft. So I went ahead and created the article. I was unaware of your draft until User:Polentarion added some material to the article and cited your draft. I wish I could add you to the DYK as co-author, but I'm not sure if they'd buy it, since you do not appear as a contributor in the history. What do you think, shall I do it anyhow? --MelanieN (talk) 16:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Hey MelanieN, no worries. You did a good job, that's all that matters! I couldn't have done it so soon because we only got the info in the evening (my time), so logically you were much better placed time-wise to deal with it. I noticed Polentarion's edit and meant to point out the article was elsewhere, but totally forgot. On a lighter note- liked your 'Ta-da!' Very cockney thanks for the nice message, but please don't worry about it! Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Just do it. As I have referred to Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's draft in my edit summaries, she's part of the contributions. Polentarion Talk 16:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Nope, doesn't matter, but very WP:CIVIL of you both. Well done on your Latin, by the way @Polentarion:! ;)_Muffled ^Pocketed 16:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Well, thanks for your cheerful and forgiving spirit. The DYK has been approved; not yet queued, but watch for it on the front page sometime soon. Bain was such a character, he inspired some marvelous hooks! --MelanieN (talk) 17:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks ;) ironically my 'cheerful and forgiving spirit' doesn't extend as far as DYK, where I've had a couple of mildly irritating experiences to the extent that I'd prefer not to be associaited with that aspect of the project. But best of luck with it anyway. On a lighter note, yep, he was one of those classic English eccentrics, eh- it's good to know that in these occassionally drab and colourless two-dimensional times there's still characters like him around! At least there were. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

I hear you. I have had, over the years, some tear-your-hair-out frustrating experiences at DYK that caused me to quit that project for months at a time. It seems to be much more stable now - I think the bot clerking has helped - but one never knows with that project. Anyhow I did add your name, but don't worry about it; if anything hits the fan, I will be the one that gets splattered. --MelanieN (talk) 17:15, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Kaiserliche Hoheit gained some points with the soapy-water-treatment of dero keyboard. Sigh, its a Kleine de:Latinum, but it seems to work still now and then. Curtsey bow - gschamster diener Polentarion Talk 16:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC) PS.: I saw that Modest proposal on the front side, interesting. I had learned about such proposal from Bernhard Mandeville first, less from Swift.

Thanks!

Thanks for the Autopatrol endorsement, really appreciated! Amkilpatrick (talk) 21:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

It was no more than is deserved- you do good work here! Cheers, and all the best, Amkilpatrick. _Muffled ^Pocketed 22:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

No. I called you a troll, a vandal and a LTA. And, of course, I was right. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 08:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for dealing with the troll. According to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/49.196.159.137, this has been a problem since February. This person reverts the recent edits of anyone who stands up to them, then tries to report them. I hope we can get a rangeblock or something like that. Again, thanks. Sro23 (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

@Sro23: Thanks for the background and the link. No worries! Did it ever have a named account, do we know? _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

I have no idea, I am only aware of the disruptive usage of multiple IP's. Sro23 (talk) 12:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Reviews

Two more done, here and here, with some more tonight. Cassianto^Talk 18:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much Cassianto- I won't have a lot of time this week due to irl commitments, but they're appreciated all the same. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 07:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Re: Goa Public Service Commission

Re your message: Thanks. I deleted it again. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

That third one was a good catch. Published at 0643, deleted 0643. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 05:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@Gogo Dodo: And it has been recreated. I suggest deleting it again and putting the good ol' block hammer on the creator. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

I think this is the fourth creation. Perhaps time to have a little WP:SALT with it... Thanks for the info DatGuy, can't log in at the mo. 2A02:C7F:BE16:8400:7CCC:6172:BDEF:9E11 (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Your message

Fortuna, please stay out. Applications in arbitration proceedings are not personal attacks. They are the oil which keeps things running smoothly. 31.54.202.183 (talk) 02:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

The only oil required is WP:DENY. Please continue to make personal attacks on high-profile pages, and please continue to revel in your reversion. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 02:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

• And thank you for providing the links to the evidence for your LTA. Good to know that even Vote (X) for Change feels the urge for confession occasionally. Delightfully Catholic. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 02:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Humphrey Stafford (died 1413) has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Humphrey Stafford (died 1413), an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Warnings

Dear User!

Really shocked to read your warning on my talk page regarding my additions on Inter_Services_Intelligence and their unfairly undoing by some users whose country was defamed for false allegations against ISI and their Govt. accepted that allegation were false. So this information needed to be included in article and that's what i did. But as a matter of fact, this thing was not digestible by Indians as they have a history of Blaming Pakistan for every incident. Ok, now you tell me would not it be unfair if anyone tries to conceal history which is not in his/her interests?? Wikipedia is a place to share accurate, verifiable and up to date information to those relying on Wikipedia. But revisions and warnings are not fair. Think about it. Thanks AKJatt (talk) 05:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@AKJatt: You've already passed the three revert rule by a mile. You could currently be blocked, however I suggest you visit the talk page of the article and discuss the issue before you are. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 07:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, DatGuy. Just so. _Muffled ^Pocketed 08:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

DatGuy Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk · contribs) WHAT A HYPOCRISYYYYYYYYY???? Does 3-Revert-Rule only applies to me or to User:Spartacus too??? If i have made 8 revisions rightfully, he have made plenty of revisions wrongfully. See the revision history and you will see SPARTACUS everywhere. Perfect example of Double Standards. If u wanna block me, GO AHEAD. I will not stop making true additions to ISI. Do whatever you can. HunhhhhAKJatt (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

@AKJatt: Borderline harassment. Creating an Edit war report now. I am talking to Spartacus on User talk:Spartacus!. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your attacks against me

Your attacks againt me will not be tolerated. This is a blocking warning. Be respectful to me and I will respect you back. Foleo (talk) 07:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

@Foleo: No; you do not give block warnings. It is that kind of WP:BATTLEGROUND behaviour that NeilN recently rewarded you with an extended block, which you have just finished.This version of your Talk Page will show other editors what brought you here. Goodbye! _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

They've been blocked again (not by me). BTW, you're lucky. You got off with a warning. I'm "blocked". --NeilN ^{talk to me} 09:27, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Unbelievable! Shouldn't chuckle, but ;)

I'm sure it's a preventative block! _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

"Other contributors or people", who else is contributing other than people? Mr rnddude (talk) 09:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Prehistoric creatures are contributing plenty Mr rnddude! bishzilla _ROARR!! 14:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC).

Note new threads belong on the bottom of a talk user's page. This is to ensure ease of accessibility to both yourself and the editor involved. Also FIM, for the love of god, start archiving your talk page. I could barely get my laptop to move this and each letter of my comment took at least 5 seconds to show up. Mr rnddude (talk) 07:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Next time

Hi,

It would be appreciated if you find something on the article, which as put it "makes little sense," instead of tagging it, or calling the whole nation for it, fix it yourself. Thank you, Mona778 (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mona778 I'll bear that in mind. I'm not sure what you mean exactly. But I hope you'll let me know! :) _Muffled ^Pocketed 22:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

You know exactly what I meant, don't pretend you don't. True, we had a bad start, but that doesn't mean we'll remain that way forever. Of course, it 'll all depend on how we behave toward each other from now on. Bye. Mona778 (talk) 00:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Mona778. The tags are actually meant to help improve the encyclopaedia. Editors like me lookout for articles with tags and then help to improve them. So when Fortuna tagged it, it was in good faith. Sometimes, editors go through lots of articles and don't have time to fix each of them. So we just tag them at that time and either fix later or wait for someone to fix. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Lemongirl942, would you please stay out of this and mind your own business. I don't think I have mentioned you anywhere in my post, which prompted you to make a comment here. By the way, I mean no disrespect, but I think your edits need to be tagged and copy edited as well, especially after those I saw you made to that article. Ah, I almost forgot! Do not ping me again, please. Thank you. Mona778 (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Since it's not your talk page, perhaps don't tell people to stay out (or off) of it. That is a courtesy reserved for the person to whom this talk page belongs (in this case Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi) and even they have limited rights to prevent editors coming here. That said, your request not to be pinged by the editor is acceptable, if unnecessary and not conducive to a co-operative environment. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Please read WP:CIVIL. Wikipedia is everyone's business, so telling me to stay out is not considered good for collaborative environment. And please point out which of my edits need copyediting and tagging. Your edits seriously needed copy editing. Everyone is willing to contribute, but you need to listen to others as well. When multiple people are telling you that your edits need copyediting, it would do better if you listen. I hope you will change your attitude. Cheers. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC) Update:Snarkiness removed as it is a new user. Thanks Mr rnddude.--Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

subversive categorisation

You know you are not supposed to do that, don't you?

Wikipedia:User categories: "user categories should not be used as "bottom-of-the-page" notices.[7] If a Wikipedian wishes to have such a notice, they may edit their user page and add the notice in some other way (such as by adding text or a userbox), rather than inappropriately creating a category grouping.[8]" Rathfelder (talk) 20:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Knock it off. It's doing literally zero harm, and it's humorous. Pointless legalism is not welcome, and in any case, the page you cite is only a guideline. I see from your talk page you've been rubbing several people up the wrong way over this. BethNaught (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Well; they carried on doing it, and three months later... ;) _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Wilhelm Ramsøe

Hey little Muffled. (Perhaps I should be writing to you c/o the pocket?) If you're at home with WP:DYK, as I'm not — I find it quite thorny — have you thought of proposing this nice new article for it? I have to admit I have trouble thinking of a thrilling hook... but still. Just a thought. Bishonen | talk 10:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC).

Dear Bishonen. That's a nice idea; but I have to say that I've never even visited DYK. I got the impression it was as bad as ANI sometimes! And like you say, the hook... "Did you know that a Danish conductor also played in Norway and Russia" is all I can think of! _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Very difficult to reply to messages in pocket... I have locked myself in the mini-bar  ;)

Suggest lock self in fridge! (First fridge, then fat camp.)[1] bishzilla _ROARR!! 12:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC).

Dead dog = shit editor

One of our dogs has just died. Stella, on the right up there.

Very sorry to hear that Fortuna :-( --Zero^talk 20:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I too am sorry for your loss. DrChrissy ^(talk) 20:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

As am I. She looked like a right badass. Hang on in there. Draco^E 17:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)Really sorry to hear that Fortuna 😢. Class455fan1 (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

I see I'm rather late to this, and I hope you don't mind me chiming in now, but as someone who has loved and lost many dogs over the years, I felt compelled to say something. A dog, really is a man's best friend. I rescued my little Staffie as an abused puppy in 2011 and I cannot imagine life without her. I do get most upset when I hear of someone losing a dog, more so than I do a human, I regret to say. I wish you a speedy grieving process. Now, aside from this remark, and all of the frankly shocking "thanks" we are awarding each other of late, let's get back to hating each other. Life was much more fun! Cassianto^Talk 08:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Good man. Thanks for that Cassianto, much appreciated. Rescuing staffies = a Raison d'être eh! Ours are all rescues too. Oh and by the way

You're a total ****** ****** ****, your edits are ***** ******* and ****** *****, ****** ***** you. OK?

;) _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Please do not delete my article "Leung Tsang"

Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, I am creating the article "Leung Tsang". You said the page appears to be a direct copy from http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~leutsang/Professional%20Services.html. Well somehow this is true. In fact this external link belongs to me. I am the owner of this link. I will put a notice on the bottom of this link and grant permission to other people. So please do not delete this article. Joestc (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

@Joestc: I did not delete it; that was Administrator RHaworth, whom I am pinging to alert of this discussion. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Warning on Nepali Keto

Just so you know that wasn't Keto posting in another language but re-posting this diff from Constantin, which seems to say that he's a new account of Mujtaba!. Happy laundry day, hope you have sufficient quarters! —SpacemanSpiff 17:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Classic! Hope he pays his sock factory minimum wage at least ;) Thanks for that info though. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gadri. They don't pay me enough for all this crap! —SpacemanSpiff 18:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Was that Roger Murtaugh?! ;) this is really bizarre. So the editor involved against a sockmaster is himself a sockmaster...? I think WP:MONTY PYTHON applies! _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Less Murtaugh and more my former boss, but any newbie who loves to hangout at SPI is definitely suspicious IMO. —SpacemanSpiff 18:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright issues

Please note that the website in question now carries a no copyright wikipedia recommended message. Please do not revert the article. Thanks Racingmanager (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

@Racingmanager: No: you do not tell other editors what to do. You see, you have recently demonstrated phenomenally poor judgement over copyright, so we will let Diannaa (for example) be the arbitor of that. :Also: since the article "'now carries" that notice, are we to assume that you have some connection to the website? It seems coincidental to say the least that it suddenly decides to release all its material under CC license, at a time when you were about to be sanctioned for misusing it.

Just a thought. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

There are other issues, which I have raised with Racingmanager but to which they did not respond. They relates to WP:SPS and the fact that the various PDFs hosted on the site in question do not carry citations. I'm afraid that this is going to get very messy - I suspect RM is very knowledgeable about the subject area but is going to fall foul of our sometimes almost self-defeating policies etc. I'm also still unhappy that they creating new stuff but not addressing the hundreds of existing problems, including that of purple prose. Frankly, I suspect most of what they're adding would be best left on their website and not transposed on Wikipedia. People would still be able to find it (well, until someone stops paying for the hosting etc). - Sitush (talk) 18:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Sitush, so you think there is a connection between Racingmanager and that website? If then, it's an WP:NRS then I guess the information it supposedly sources should probably be nuked from orbit. _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

See this. It is all very unfortunate. Each article needs to be reconstructed from the underlying books etc, assuming that Racingmanager is not also the author of any of those. It's a fairly niche area, I should imagine. - Sitush (talk) 19:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Eg: they created 1953 English Greyhound Derby in the last few hours but I just know that the Competition Report section is not all in the one cited source. I know that because they've previously said that such reports are compiled by them from several sources. - Sitush (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

I recommended that each individual PDF should carry the required license, not just the website main page carrying a notice "The text of this website ...". Also, Sitush has valid concerns about citing your own (unsourced) work and whether or not the material as a whole can be considered as a reliable source for this wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC) Adding: Failing that, what you need to do is make it clearer on the home page that all the PDF subpages are also licensed. Also, attribution needs to be added to the Wikipedia pages, specifying that the material is copied from the source website. Here is an example of how to do that. All this is moot if the material is deemed not to be a reliable source for this wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Edits at RfPP

You're talking rubbish as usual. I reverted the edits at RfPP. 92.8.222.87 (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

You're unbelievable. You claimed to have reverted an edit I made at RfPP. You did no such thing. All you did was troll my talk page (twice). 92.8.222.87 (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

You trolled RFPP and then deleted it. Goodbye. _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Just in case you're not familiar with this particular breed of troll: Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

• @Favonian: Thanks for the info- have come across him before, but not usually at close encounters. Cheers, _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination

I can assure you that the sources used are genuine (I have all the books listed as references) but I can see your point that parts of the article in question are similar to the website. I will rewrite in due course. ThanksRacingmanager (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Racingmanager: No-one disputes whether the sources are genuine: it was the fact that 90% of it was copied verbatim from [2]. Anyway; I note you have rectified that particular article, so I enk yow for that. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

My talk page

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please don't post on my talk page again. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 09:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Dear Mathsci; as a so-called regular, you should know better than to leave uncivil edit-summaries. Which is everyone on WP's business. Ta. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Leaving this diff here, so we can all remember Mathsci's edit summary... _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please don't ping me. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 11:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Mathsci Please do not post here. _Muffled ^Pocketed 11:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please do not warn me to stop stalking here, thanks. — TOG 11:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A moment

Can we just take a moment to appreciate sine bot becoming an activist. The edit summary is lovely [3]. Mr rnddude (talk) 10:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Brilliant Can we get Sinebot to Syria... the bot will sort it out!!! _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Let no signature go unsigned. Yes, stall them with bureaucracy, then nothing will get done. Wait, wait, wait, are those weapons signed? no? well we can't have that now, can we.  :) Mr rnddude (talk) 10:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

required arbcom notice

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#I wish for some resolution of the harassment, wikihounding, wikistalking, and attempts to WP:OUTING of me over the approximately last 60 days by user HappyValleyEditor and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant 01:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Catherine of Lancaster

I apologize for reapplying my edit without explanation--I didn't realize you'd undone my previous edit before I reapplied it (I thought I might have mixed that page up with another one). That seems to be the new format for the house section of the royalty infobox (see pages of people from more well-known houses such as the Houses of Hanover, Plantagenet, and Windsor), as the "House of" part is rather redundant. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

@Iamthecheese44: Please show me the MoS guideline and consensus for this change. _Muffled ^Pocketed 08:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hspa.22

Yes, it was Saatvik.Jacob Material Scientist I was thinking of. Sorry I was a bit cryptic, I was dashing out of the house at the time! Still, all's well that ends well as a countryman of mine once wrote. I'm keeping an eye on {{noping|Hspa.20}] but I'm not sure yet that it's him. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

@Malcolmxl5: He mentioned Hspa.17 and Hspa.19 on his TP too- although also claimed they were administrators- and they don't seem to be registered- YET! Keeping an eye out for them to do so though. Cheers mate _Muffled ^{<for nt color="red">Pocketed} 16:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, those don't exist. I'm hesitating about Hspa.20 because they didn't use a mobile like the others but we can wait and see. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Right; although just to let you know that here he acknowledges he is on a mobile at that time, but also that he has a laptop at home (30 miles away- not that far!)- so it could well be that being used? _Muffled ^Pocketed 16:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hspa.20 (talk · contribs · count) is  Confirmed.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Cheers bbb. Call me Van Helsing _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

You mean Dr. Van Helsing. I wonder if he's related to Drmies.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Sock Smeller Persuivant at your service :) The doc's rocks meeces! _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Will keep this here for VarunFEB2003: Aide-memoire.

== Some Advice RE: Your editing ==

I just thought I'd give you a little advice: Right now, it really feels like you do not understand what Wikipedia is about. You have just under 1,500 edits, and over 1,200 of them are to User or User Talk pages. You have a total of 63 149 edits to Talk and Mainspace pages combined, less than 10% of your edits. [4] This is an encyclopedia, not a social media site. Barnstars, awards, and gussying up your User Page are all minor distractions to the main one: The Encyclopedia.

There have been users blocked in the past due to not being here to improve the Encyclopedia. You should probably take note of the second bolded line under WP:!HERE. Between the fact that your contribution percentages are so far out of balance, the fact that you are trying to keep a non-free file without even trying to understand why you can not do that, and the fact that you keep asking everyone to sign your guestbook like we are on MySpace, I am afraid you will probably head toward a block due to disruption sooner rather than later, unless you change how you are doing things. 2602:306:C41D:E880:C957:2302:5BD5:3869 (talk) 23:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

	The Original Barnstar
	If we work together, we can improve wikipedia. Keep wondering y u keep revising my edits when all I wanna do is sort the list alphabetically and add missing names. Makes it easier for people to find names and see which ones are missing. If u wanna point any mistakes I'm making, I'm open to suggestions and ways to improve 1960boy (talk) 11:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pls stop attacking me...!!

See above ^^^
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Please stop sending messages on my talkpage.., Hspa.22 (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive messages about your bad behaviour, then may I suggest you improve it? Many thanks. Muffled Pocketed 09:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Please do not interfere

Hspa.22 blocked as a sock. Surprise surprise. Muffled Pocketed 12:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Its between me and material scientist do not interfere old...pls DO NOT.....!! AND DK NOT SEND WIKI MESSAGES WHILE I AM IN COLEEGE LECTURE...!! Hspa.22 (talk) 09:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker) @Hspa.22: huh? Maybe you should be focusing on your lecture instead of edit warring over a unreferenced (and mostly fluff) sentence? Please stop shouting, and calm down -- samtar talk or stalk 09:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Dan Wagner

Your recent change to Dan Wagner article has been reverted by User:Techtrek. It has been reported that this user may have an undeclared interest in the subject, http://uk.businessinsider.com/techtreks-wikipedia-edits-on-powa-founder-dan-wagner-2016-3. Please can you assist? 2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much for that, 2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB. Feel free to email. That behaviour seems pretty consistent over the last few years? _Muffled ^Pocketed 19:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your assistance. Unfortunately, they've reverted your changes again. You are correct, this has been going on for a number of years. It always turns into a pr puff piece. Suspect the account ia him or his or company flame pr as the account contributed the profile picture with the copyright belonging to flamepr

2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB (talk)

Reference desk trolling

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

You reverted good faith edits at the Reference desk (which can only be trolling) and had the nerve to claim you were reverting a troll. Are you incapable of doing anything constructive? 79.77.28.185 (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

I know. I love it. Easy Like Sunday Morning. _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I am not a VANDAL

Trolling. Currently at An/I wishing he was wearing an anti-WP:BOOMERANG hat... Muffled Pocketed 10:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
You have blocked me as an Vandalism only account, why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerendWorst (talk • contribs) 09:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your post at User talk:73.133.140.233, though I'll mention that Bishzilla doesn't like it when I'm edit conflicted. Go back in pocket! Bishonen | talk 19:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC).

• MMMMFFFFFUUUUURGH!* The other editor's view was understandable- I think the anon had been leading him a runaround for sometime! I name-checked you on his page too. *Finds baconbits for 'zilla* _Muffled ^Pocketed 19:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Did someone say bacon? -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 19:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

@Samtar: It would certainly get his career back on track- one way or another! _Muffled ^Pocketed 19:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

VarunFEB2003

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I'd not say hi your conduct is really very bad. you have no right to delete something from someone elses user page. Moreover ur user page says u are an apprentice editor and ur talk page says u are a tutunum or veteran editor. This is very bad and very confusing. pls correvt it and display the correct badge of service awards And pls leave my user and talk page alone If u wanna reply use ping. i am not interested in opening ur page again --VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

You are a very new editor, and I'm afraid you do not know what bad conduct is. You should not pretend to be something you are not; even for a so-called joke, that is unacceptable in an online community. You repeatedly ignored more than one editor before eventually (partially) rectifying the issue. You pretended to be an administrator; an 'awesome-Wikipedian'; and to have your own day. None of these things are true, as you have only been here a few weeks. Those are things that are awarded by the community as a sign of trust and respect and they have to be earned. They cannot be just taken. And those barnstars: did you create those accounts as well? @VarunFEB2003:. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

I told u i was constructing my page i had copied the items ill remove them now pls my construction hasnt finished ill remove conflicting material dont edit pls--VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

@VarunFEB2003: You did not answer my question about the barnstars I see. You have until this evening, your time, to remove everything on your user page that isn't true, or I will seek administrative attention. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I have asked at the help desk of wikipedia if any user is allowed to award himself barnstars or copy the editor of the week box AND THE ANSWER WAS YES. you wont find it there now because it is in archives of Help Desk. Go and search it and see. I QUESTIONED THERE FIRST BEFORE PLACING ANYTHING ON MY PAGES So I'd better tell u that u dont interfere in my page it will be good for u. You have no right to do anything to anybody elses wikipedia user page. It is not an Encyclopaedia article that you can make changes whenever u want. So it will be a lot good if u better forget about me. MOREOVER I HAVE WRITTEN THEY ARE FALSE AND FOR HUMOR ONLY. (i HAVE REMOVED MY OWN DAY AND ADMIN THING)

--VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Dear VarunFEB2003, how good to hear from you again. Yes I know what you were told here; I have already told you what other editors might think if they realised you were deliberately misleading them (for fun? This is not really the place for that, as you might be realising). I note you have not explained what the accounts are that you awarded the barnstars to yourself in the name of are- why did you set them up? That's something else that is looked at with a jaundiced eye. Your attitude certainly seems to tend towards the aggressive; you may think it amusing to do so, but it will make you few friends. In fact, many people are already watching your account; and remember, everything you type, everything you remove, is always there in the history. So it is really better not to go around threatening people like you have. May I suggest that instead of concerning yourself with the arcane (such as bots, recognition, and awards), you demonstrate your willingness to contribute to the project; if people think you are not listening to them or only here for your own aggrandizement, then your career as a Wikipedia editor, such as it is, may end sooner than you would like. Goodbye. _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Bro i have nothing personally against anyone Now u see the editor of week box it NOMORE SAYS EDITOR OF WEKK IT SAYS NOT THE EDITOR OF WEEK IS IT OKAY NOW? And sorry for my aggression I was just too angry, sorry. The barnstarts do not point to anyone so u can already see they are false and I have also mentioned. Its getiing night here Ill come to reply tomorrow morning. Pls do not edit my page anymore I have removed or edited all conflict material that misleads VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Okaaaay... Nothing wrong with enthusiasm; sometimes a gentle step is needed though! Sleep well bro :) _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and I just got up. a sleep really did good : cooled my brain. I am really sorry for my last nights conduct. Is my page okay now? Anything still that is conflicting. Pls reply. Thanks and regards. Could U pls ping me as I open lot of pages and I forget them, sorry VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 06:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

@VarunFEB2003: Sorry I didn't get back to you, I didn't see the message alert. No worries! I say we're probably all a-👌 !!! Good man. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks but how u made that nice sign of the hand VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 10:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

That was on my phone I'm afraid, but if you go to WP:EMOTE there's loads there to use- and someone else who knows slut those things might even show you how to make more (if that's possible, I don't know). _Muffled ^Pocketed 10:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wrong. Count them.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Nope, wrong. I only made 3 (the multiples only count as one because they were partial). Too Small a Fish to Fry (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks for the confession, Too Small a Fish to Fry. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Imelda Marcos

Imeldific bocked 24-hours by EdJohnston; also note the former's retaliatory AN3 here. Muffled Pocketed 10:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Please discuss at the talk page]. Those edits are with WP:SAMESURNAME. Imeldific (talk) 22:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Made me smile

I hope I'm not the only one to catch the humor in this edit--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Well caught Sphilbrick; didn't think anyone would notice... _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

I hate to say that I was wrong, but...

judging from your recent edits/comments, I was most certainly wrong to judge you and to state that your comments were not welcome on my talk page.

It seems very obvious to me, that your comments/edits are fair and designed to improve wikipedia.

I apologize for being a defensive and judgmental ass. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 06:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

@Spacecowboy420: No worries, and thank you for that. We just got off on the wrong foot; it happens. You do good work here- removing swathes of unsourced crap is an interest of mine too (and if it's POV bigotry, all the better!) Cheers! _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Henry VI of England, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.205.197.158 (talk) 17:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

• In my attempt to look into why I would have been invoked here at all, I discovered the strangest thing: the IP tagged themself as a "suspected sockpuppet" of me, for no immediately apparent reason as I can't identify any topic on which we ever would have interacted. So yeah, I'm putting my money on "unproductive editor, trolling". Bearcat (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Cheers, Bearcat, I reported it to AIV, don't know whether it was really vandalism. Nice of him to own up to your socking for you though! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

ANI

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hey, this might be interesting to you. --Jayron32 14:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Indeed! Cheers, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

@Jayron32: Might be missing something here, but wouldn't the common response to an editor recreating the same deleted thing four times usually- all things being equal- be a preventative (at the least) block? As disruptive behaviour, if nothing else? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

That's what we're discussing. --Jayron32 14:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Right. Allow me to to gee things along a bit. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Phew...

Thanks. Lourdes 12:57, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@Lourdes: I think you were absolutely right. It's not over yet though; have you seen his request to get his TP fully proteceted fro 'trolls'? Or, this which is an attempt to move his TP to a sandbox.. and then requesting it to be speedied? Unfortunately, I think we have a large portion of WP:IDHT here, with a side of WP:CIR. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes. I agree. Has spent quite some time on Wikipedia though. So it's surprising...especially as the editor put up a note at the Optional Rfa poll wishing to apply... Hope the editor gets clue soon. But hey, thanks again for pinging Sarah. Lourdes 13:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I suspect that the editor may be young, or non-English-native, even if he has been around for 6 years. --Izno (talk) 13:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@Izno: That could be the case; until Lourdes mentioned it just there, I hadn't checked their stats and did indeed assume it was someone too young, as it were, for the job. The OPRC definitely explains why he tried to erase all trace of that discussion though. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I think the ORCP is what spurred the closures, actually. --Izno (talk) 13:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Izno To get a bit of admin-work under the belt? -I think that may have misfired, then! _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:26, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Interjection

For all your info, I am not "young" and a British citizen born and bred and have spent six years of my life constructively editing here. I respectfully ask for all of your cooperation and kindfully ask that you all desist from stalking me any further. Thankyou. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi The move of one of my old userpages (note: I used to edit under the name od Nordic Dragon) is unrelated to this issue. Feel free to contact user:Jo-Jo Eumerus for clarification. Nordic Nightfury 13:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your message here Nordic Nightfury; such a willingness to communicate might have worked wonders earlier. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Please clarify you have read and understood the above statement that I have sent you, I kindly ask you to strike a comment that you have made. Nordic Nightfury 13:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure to which comment you are referring to. But, since you delight in calling other editors 'trolls' at the drop of a hat, I think we both know the answer to that. _Muffled ^Pocketed

Thanks for the edit-conflict. A) You don't need to ping me on my own TP, I will get a message alert anyway, and B) your ping would not in any case work, as it was added separately to the time-stamp. Many thanks. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

"Or, this which is an attempt to move his TP to a sandbox.. and then requesting it to be speedied?". As I said above, it is unrelated to this issue, if you care to read the page history. Nordic Nightfury 13:48, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

The page that you keep trying to fully-protect? The one that you keep removing comments from half through a discussion? _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

No, the one I moved to my sandbox. As linked in your comment. Hmmm... Nordic Nightfury 13:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I thought we had sorted this. Obviously not. The page in question, user talk:Nordic Nightfury/sandbox is a page I moved from user talk:Nordic Dragon, which is the pseudonym I last edited with, before being renamed. A user, by the name of Davidcouzens123; whom on 18th October, left a phone number on it. Jo-Jo Eumerus very kindly deleted the two diffs that it was on. Then you blame me because you thought it came from my new talkpage. Like I said, if you care to read, this is a different matter, therefore I reserve the right to speedy it. I therefore ask again, please strike your comment above which relates to this. Nordic Nightfury 14:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

OK, let's get this straight. You have the fucking balls to call other editors trolls and delete their comments, but you still think you have some sort of right to demand satisfaction? _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:20, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I apologised for using that term via RFPP. Now, I am ending this discussion here. If you don't have the audacity to admit you are wrong by adding a page totally unnecessary to this conversation I will take it higher. Goodbye. Nordic Nightfury 14:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I think you probably should. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

• Oh my lord........... Lourdes 15:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@Lourdes: Yes, it was was all rather unfortunate really. _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Although for some more than others, it must be said; as is the way of these things. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

• Or- not, as the case might be. Certain points of note were [5] and [6]. Unfortunately I never got around to commenting myself, there always seemed to be something else to do. As the fella says: Turned Out Nice Again  :) Happy Wednesday everybody! _Muffled ^Pocketed 04:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Do you want it re-opened? I appreciate that you were busy, although it seemed everyone had gone home. I was obviously wrong and I apologise if you wanted to make some, no doubt interesting points. Yours till the cows come home, Irondome (talk) 13:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Cheers Irondome, no worries it's fine. I'm sure the points I would have made are best left unmade, and the points that were made probably said enough. Thanks anyway, _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that last comprehensive comment on the thread was pretty devastating in any event. Irondome (talk) 13:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Mmmm I could read that all day. Irondome, changinging the subject, do you deal with copyright issues at all? Found an complicated one (for me anyway). _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

yes it was rather err wide ranging My relationship to and fear of copyright stuff is akin to rabies. My first stop whenever such scary stuff appears on the radar is the excellent User:Diannaa. What she doesn't know about this distasteful area aint worth knowing. Give her a bell. Irondome (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, wilco. Good luck _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

You too! She is very good, so it should be a doddle. Be seeing you. Simon. Irondome (talk) 14:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

"Trolling"

Hi, why'd you revert my edit to User talk:SimonTrew? It wasn't "Trolling" and you obviously didn't assume good faith. This user has been stalking Neelix's edits; I think that is a valid reason to give them a warning for harassment. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

I have not been "stalking" Neelix redirects. (How is that possible to stalk a list that is WP:G6 Neelix concession and a list is not a person? ""Walking" the list certainly but not stalking it. What does that mean?) I have been patiently and diligently going through the User:Anomie#Neelix list and keeping, listing at CSD, or listing at RfD as I see fit. I didn't even see what you posted User:Anarchyte but feel free to post it again. It's An administrative list created in a one off run by a bot. How can I possibly stalk that? Can it sue me?

See the ANI for User:SimonTrew. I really get fed up explaining my actions over and over again. Take it there. If you look at my edit history even this morning (UTC+2) you will see I have actually kept and rcatted far more Neelix redirects than I have listed at RfD and CSD.

I really do not understand this at all. The redirect silvery-leaved which was recently created (21 May) taken as WP:R3 by User:Iridescent nothing to do with the WP:G6 Neelix concession, was not actually created by Neelix, (or Neelix is back in which case he's more than welcome to edit anyway but not to create redirects, that is the entire extent of his "ban", he has essentially banished himself Wikipedia hasn't and he made thousands of thousands of good redirects when the search engine was not as good as it is now), as a non-admin I can't see the history of who created it but I imagine it was in good faith as indeed Neelix created redirects in good faith.

I didn't list it at CSD, we had a couple of similar ones for silver trees which I was not entirely sure about and took them to RfD so that our botanic experts could check them out for sanity and they said they were fine and they are speedily withdrawn by me as keep earlier this morning and really essentially waiting for another editor to close them since as an involved party I can't really close them myself {{nac}} or not, that would be unfair. What's this "stalking" nonsense? I think you must be mistaken.

I'm going to copy/paste this to my talk page.

No if Fortuna doesn't mind us squatting at this user's talk page for a bit, I might as well just @Anarchyte: and leave the conversation in one place.

Si Trew (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

No worries both! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Phew...

Thanks. Lourdes 12:57, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@Lourdes: I think you were absolutely right. It's not over yet though; have you seen his request to get his TP fully proteceted fro 'trolls'? Or, this which is an attempt to move his TP to a sandbox.. and then requesting it to be speedied? Unfortunately, I think we have a large portion of WP:IDHT here, with a side of WP:CIR. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes. I agree. Has spent quite some time on Wikipedia though. So it's surprising...especially as the editor put up a note at the Optional Rfa poll wishing to apply... Hope the editor gets clue soon. But hey, thanks again for pinging Sarah. Lourdes 13:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I suspect that the editor may be young, or non-English-native, even if he has been around for 6 years. --Izno (talk) 13:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@Izno: That could be the case; until Lourdes mentioned it just there, I hadn't checked their stats and did indeed assume it was someone too young, as it were, for the job. The OPRC definitely explains why he tried to erase all trace of that discussion though. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I think the ORCP is what spurred the closures, actually. --Izno (talk) 13:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Izno To get a bit of admin-work under the belt? -I think that may have misfired, then! _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:26, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Interjection

For all your info, I am not "young" and a British citizen born and bred and have spent six years of my life constructively editing here. I respectfully ask for all of your cooperation and kindfully ask that you all desist from stalking me any further. Thankyou. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi The move of one of my old userpages (note: I used to edit under the name od Nordic Dragon) is unrelated to this issue. Feel free to contact user:Jo-Jo Eumerus for clarification. Nordic Nightfury 13:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your message here Nordic Nightfury; such a willingness to communicate might have worked wonders earlier. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Please clarify you have read and understood the above statement that I have sent you, I kindly ask you to strike a comment that you have made. Nordic Nightfury 13:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure to which comment you are referring to. But, since you delight in calling other editors 'trolls' at the drop of a hat, I think we both know the answer to that. _Muffled ^Pocketed

Thanks for the edit-conflict. A) You don't need to ping me on my own TP, I will get a message alert anyway, and B) your ping would not in any case work, as it was added separately to the time-stamp. Many thanks. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

"Or, this which is an attempt to move his TP to a sandbox.. and then requesting it to be speedied?". As I said above, it is unrelated to this issue, if you care to read the page history. Nordic Nightfury 13:48, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

The page that you keep trying to fully-protect? The one that you keep removing comments from half through a discussion? _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

No, the one I moved to my sandbox. As linked in your comment. Hmmm... Nordic Nightfury 13:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I thought we had sorted this. Obviously not. The page in question, user talk:Nordic Nightfury/sandbox is a page I moved from user talk:Nordic Dragon, which is the pseudonym I last edited with, before being renamed. A user, by the name of Davidcouzens123; whom on 18th October, left a phone number on it. Jo-Jo Eumerus very kindly deleted the two diffs that it was on. Then you blame me because you thought it came from my new talkpage. Like I said, if you care to read, this is a different matter, therefore I reserve the right to speedy it. I therefore ask again, please strike your comment above which relates to this. Nordic Nightfury 14:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

OK, let's get this straight. You have the fucking balls to call other editors trolls and delete their comments, but you still think you have some sort of right to demand satisfaction? _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:20, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

I apologised for using that term via RFPP. Now, I am ending this discussion here. If you don't have the audacity to admit you are wrong by adding a page totally unnecessary to this conversation I will take it higher. Goodbye. Nordic Nightfury 14:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I think you probably should. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

• Oh my lord........... Lourdes 15:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@Lourdes: Yes, it was was all rather unfortunate really. _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Although for some more than others, it must be said; as is the way of these things. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

• Or- not, as the case might be. Certain points of note were [7] and [8]. Unfortunately I never got around to commenting myself, there always seemed to be something else to do. As the fella says: Turned Out Nice Again  :) Happy Wednesday everybody! _Muffled ^Pocketed 04:20, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Do you want it re-opened? I appreciate that you were busy, although it seemed everyone had gone home. I was obviously wrong and I apologise if you wanted to make some, no doubt interesting points. Yours till the cows come home, Irondome (talk) 13:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Cheers Irondome, no worries it's fine. I'm sure the points I would have made are best left unmade, and the points that were made probably said enough. Thanks anyway, _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that last comprehensive comment on the thread was pretty devastating in any event. Irondome (talk) 13:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Mmmm I could read that all day. Irondome, changinging the subject, do you deal with copyright issues at all? Found an complicated one (for me anyway). _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

yes it was rather err wide ranging My relationship to and fear of copyright stuff is akin to rabies. My first stop whenever such scary stuff appears on the radar is the excellent User:Diannaa. What she doesn't know about this distasteful area aint worth knowing. Give her a bell. Irondome (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, wilco. Good luck _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

You too! She is very good, so it should be a doddle. Be seeing you. Simon. Irondome (talk) 14:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

karan singh grover

can u please have a look at this page? digvijay and another editor is vandalising this page by continuing to remove valuable informationHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

You will soon be reported to WP:3RR actually :) _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

this is ridiculous, why different rules for different pages? please have a look at how much well sourced and important information was removed on karan singh grover page and was called trivial why different rules for this page??Hollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

If you wish to dispute the content, fine- do so on the talk page in consensus with other editors. You are currently involved in an edit-war, and even if you think you are in the right, that is not how things are done around here! Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

please have a look at the page I have mentioned, and see how the user digvijay has removed loads of well sourced information and has violated the page? and then conveniently is calling me a vandaliser for kvb's page? it is a requestHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

¿Why?

Sorry, ¿why you deleted my message?.... it was incoherent.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulof4 (talk • contribs)

Yes. That was why. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

So reverting

My changes to omallur were restructuring.... You accidentally reverted everything Blisspop 13:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rortosthanos (talk • contribs)

Not accidentally, I assure you. PLease provide reliable sources for any material you add. And please remember to sign your bloody comments. Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't see why you can't respond in a polite way. Blisspop 15:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

What do you find impolite? And who the hell is Bisspop? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Once again-the word 'bloody' doesn't need to be used and blisspop is my hat for all it matters to you Blisspop 17:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Well; if you used ~~~~ to sign your sodding posts, I wouldn't have to ask. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop posting in my user page

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please to stop writing in user page, amically,
thank you
signed
NotAlpArslan (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC).

For the record, Fortuna has never posted on your User page. You must stop your silly behaviour or face banning from the project imho. Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 11:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: your repeating baiting of this user is not constructive. Please stay away from them and their talk page, okay? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please note that user is now blocked / UP blanked / and the cretinious ANI report dismissed with a boomerang. Thank goodness I didn't take your advice. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

User:MSGJ, no disrespect, but I advise you to keep well out of this. Defending this editor will not cover you with glory. It is not 'baiting' (whatever that is, outside of a playground). You would of course know that if you looked just slightly deeper into the situtation. Sorry to be robust, but I find your unfounded remarks extremely offensive. Thanks. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Agree with Fortuna totally. Look at the history, there isn't much. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 13:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

• Note

1. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#User_by_the_name_of_ProKro_using_an_untolerable_language
2. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#Clear_vandalism_by_Kintetsubuffalo

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

thanks to God.is not thanks God

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I just to be thankful，thanks to God.mayby “thanks God haha”is wrong mind，so I change，please forgive me，and Fortuna（you） misunderstand my mind.say “...not for very long, perhaps...”so please delete，I cant delete.

Qed237  said“Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Qed237, you may be blocked from editing.” Qed237  said

so please you delete“...not for very long, perhaps...” you misunderstand my mind.mayby “thanks God haha”let you think I am a bad men?haha,it is really mistake.I am happy,Because the thing is over.I have depression you know.I was very friendly, just afraid of injury,and afraid of injury anybody you and me......I am happy very happy everyone is ok!I think you are the same to me,right? thanks to God. Adsafe (talk) 15:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Qed237 is very very very afraid to delete your edit,alas...

I am very happy to get your help but.......they are free，right？I think you can know what I say.you will be the best wiki men always（come on!）.Adsafe (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

and I am sorry to modify it always.I am a depressed patient.I am afraid of injury you， so I must do my best and perfect letter to you.and because this my edit always again and again.so sorry please fogive me. Adsafe (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

UPDATE: Sock now [9] Blocked by User:Huon _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New Buckenham

Hello (2). I have now found some material on my talk page that I think is some references that you were referring to, which I can see you have provided in good faith, but what you have sent relates to Old Buckenham which is a neighbouring parish, and aspects of the history of New Buckenham that are unrelated to the material I am trying to post. please don't be offended but could I ask if you have read the material I tried to post, in the revised and sourced/ referenced version?... are you an official editor - how does this work ? thanks Observer900 (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your message, if it is from you, you have said you have provided a wealth of information, can you please let me know where you have put it, how will I receive what you have sent ? I am trying to be collegiate by trying to 'talk' with the person who keeps deleting my input but they do not reply ? Observer900 (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, can you please explain why you have deleted my edit on this page, the material I have shown has sources and referencing displayed. are you an official editor, could you please explain ??, thanks.... Observer900 (talk) 14:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Observer900: I have already replied to you at User talk:Charlesdrakew. Although this discussion should be taking place on your own talk page, not others'! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

you have deleted an edit, please explain what you mean in your comment ?, I suspect you don't know this place, my sources are accurate, the wording is factually correct, could you please explain why you completely deleted what I carefully entered ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Observer900 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

If you continue to make edits without providing reliable, secondary independant sources, then they will be continuously reverted. You have been told this now multiple times by different editors; and I for one am heartilly sick of having the same discussion over and over. Since you seem incapable of listening to or taking advice, I see no profit to either of us in continuing this converstaion. I consider this topic closed. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Trolling from User:Shivam8540

So you deleted the full edit without a second thought. Cool, you might be a real idiot.

I'll make changes more appropriately this time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivam8540 (talk • contribs)

Harry Potter children's film list

WP:DENY
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too: PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings or are marketed to teens/adults. In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC) You are an edit-warrior and a WP:SOCK. Goodbye. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC) To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too: "PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings or are marketed to teens/adults. In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience" Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC) Please explain to me what you are doing right by posting films that violet the criteria of being a children's film to this list. They don't qualify. I'm following the rules. You're not. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC) violate Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC) To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too. "PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience" Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Why are you deleting relevant information?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

What are you doing and why? I am adding good content and you guys are just deleting it as if you don't want new info in the article!! Please stop deleting info. Instead contribute information or give proper structure to the page but please stop just deleting. Just deleting is not any kind of contribution! — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 15:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

• Note Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi will now refer K Sikdar to Isambard Kingdom's edit summary. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

What is wrong?

You are behaving like some wiki mafia!! You guys are just deleting new info! Please stop imposing your opinion and check the correctness of info we are adding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 15:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

you are not an administrator

Please mind your own business. You are not an administrator. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 10:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Ah. So you spent your block learning how to take advice and reading WP:CIVIL or WP:AGF...?

No??? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

That rather seems to have settled that.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. Your recent edit to the page East_London_(bus_company) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=East_London_(bus_company)&diff=711381814&oldid=710765493 I don't know what your game is, but one minute you're bulk reverting real editors as "socks" and the next you're adding nonsense about London running trolleybuses in 1972. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC) Perhaps you would prefer the previous edit to have remained? You are not welcome to repy here I'm afraid. You behaviour now has all the hallmarks of stalking. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC) You added the phrase "until Trolleybuses [ended]" to a sentence about London in 1972. This is nonsense; either obvious nonsense or else not-obvious to someone who should at least recognise they don't have the subject knowledge to be editing anything like that. Would I prefer the previous edit? Yes, of course I would - you added nonsense. If you don't wish to discuss it here, then you know where WP:ANI is. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC) Don't make me laugh. Like you lodged an SPI?! Before I edited it, the article said "They remained in service at Leyton ended in 1972." Make much sense? No. And that's what you would prefer... brilliant! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:48, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Revert

Bocked edit-warrior.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Revert I have given reference and explained in talk page Truth should trump (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Revert

Hi Truth should trump (talk) 19:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Truth should trump

Editor was blocked at exactly the same time as your AN3 filing. Thanks for filing the report anyway - much appreciated. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Great minds eh? Cheers for info Chesnaught555. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 20:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Most definitely! No problem at all. :-) --Ches (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Rona Ambrose is a pro-life feminist

Hello Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi,

You have recently reverted an edit on Pro-life feminism claiming that the information was unsourced. There were 4 sources in the article alone, and several more on the talk page. Please undo your reversion as there were many sources afterall. Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk) 19:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

I appreciate the point, and the work you are doing. Unfortunately, however, it is not the number of sources per article that is relevant, but sources per assertion. The assertion you made, whilst possibly true, needs verification. May I point you to the essay, which is rather apposite at this juncture, WP:VNT- for Wikipedia, verifiabilty is more important than an abstract truth, or a belief in such a truth. Also, it is worth pointing out that the assessment of these sources as reliable rests not on individual editors, but on the consensus of the community of editors watching that page. Who doubtless have also seen the sources on the TP. Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 19:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

You have recently claimed that the articles by The National Post, The Globe and Mail, and The Calgary Herald are "blogs". These are major Canadian newspapers, not blogs. Please undo your reversion. Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry

I am terribly sorry if I caused any trouble I was just joking with a friend and thought there would be no harm. It will not happen again. REDTMR1 (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

AN/I

Just making you aware of this - when you left a comment regarding Wikicology's indef block proposal, your signature did not display correctly (precisely the "Fortuna" bit; the coding for the green writing must've been broken). I'm not sure how to fix it, otherwise I would've done it for you. Link to diff: Here. Best, --Ches (talk) (contribs) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the note, Chesnaught555- I was on my phone this morning, which explains the typos- but I can't for the life of me resolve the sig. I even retyped it off-wiki (notepad), and it still comes out the same there Seems OK now- I had to redo the four tildes though. Got a bit worried when I saw the new message there! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

No problem - sorry for worrying you with the message! --Ches (talk) (contribs) 16:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Ha! I thought it was the old 'there is a discussion taking place about you at...' Cheers Chesnaught555. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps I should've thought of a better title... my apologies :-) --Ches (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Correction of English

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi I don't want to remove my comments from the talk pages. But can you please correct my English a bit? These are the articles I have commented on: Achaemenid empire, Parthian empire, Sasanian Empire. Arman ad60 (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thank you

Your comments at AIV are appreciated. I knew we'd crossed paths recently, at Alice Lai Nga Yu. To my minor chagrin, my usual IP was jogged to this one, at least for the moment. Cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:60FC:44F0:F227:C4AF (talk) 14:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

No worries. I began by editing as an IP, and frankly eventually registered an account because it was too much hard work- automatically being considered a noob, and frankly a second class editor. Your resilence is admirable! And yes, I see you are (were) CD63- it must be annoying to do a tonne of edits and then get the counter reset to zero. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Profile of Abhishek Verma (businessman)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Can you please add a photo of Abhishek Verma to his wikipedia profile that you have been updating / editing? The photo from Abhishek Verma's Google+ profile is below. It does not have copyright issues as it is on the net.

AV photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Authorincharge (talk • contribs) 11:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm afraid everything that's 'on the net' is usually owned by someone- people just don't realise it. See WP:F. Cheers! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alice Lai Nga Yu

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, I removed passages of unacceptable content from the article again, but didn't stop to check whether that removed copyright violations, your rationale for a speedy deletion nomination. My apologies if I mucked things up. Just so tired of the crap they keep off-loading there. Thank you for your good work, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

No problems CD63, thanks for doing that, I totally agree with your assesment. The copyvios were every sentence that I found, just scattered throughout. But it was still the right thing to do- cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 18:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.