User talk:Authorincharge

Authorincharge, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Authorincharge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Abhishek Verma

Please note that while an article about Abhishek Verma the businessman may be an appropriate addition to Wikipedia, it will have to be located at a new disambiguated title — you may not simply hijack and overwrite the existing article about a different Abhishek Verma. Your edits have been moved to the new page Abhishek Verma (businessman), while the original article has been returned to its prior topic. Bearcat (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do read the message above and leave alone the article on Abhishek Verma (archer). Materialscientist (talk) 03:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, you're incorrect about the timetable involved — at its original creation, the article was always about the archer. And secondly, a person's age has nothing to do with the question of who should get the plain title and who has to be disambiguated: that decision is made on the basis of which one has a stronger claim to being primary topic for that name, not which one is older or younger than which other one. There may be a case to be made that the businessman should be considered primary topic instead of the archer, but their ages don't make that decision and you don't get to make that decision unilaterally either — you would have to propose it for discussion to determine a consensus one way or the other. Bearcat (talk) 04:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013 Indian helicopter bribery scandal

added a link pointing to Romanian

Anca Verma

added a link pointing to Weapons trade

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Shrikant verma"

Shrikant verma, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it needs to be deleted for uncontroversial maintenance reasons.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 08:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC),[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shrikant Verma, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bilaspur and Abhishek Verma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:47, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://pratilipi.in/shrikant-verma/

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We need to come to an understanding about copyright issues before you can return to editing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Why should I be unblocked for pasting a weblink of the book for which I own the copyright? It is unfair.

You copied and pasted text from the website to here Shrikant Verma

You must paraphrase, never copy and paste

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

Apologies. Wont copy and paste in future. Please unblock. Also sent you an email directly about this. Thanks

Have you had a chance to read WP:COI? You are not to write about your clients directly without disclosure. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

We confirm we will not write about our clients without full disclosure on talk page, as per Wikipedia policy. Kindly unblock us. thank you.

Can you state who the "us" is you refer to? Who you work for will also need to go here [1]. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

I have just now emailed you my photo ID of the BAR ASSOCIATION ID and that of my Law Firm's senior partner on your email. Please check. "US" refers to the lawfirm and this is the way we write in India when addressing someone on behalf of an organization / lawfirm. regards Authorincharge

Authorincharge: are you saying you are the legal representative of someone with a Wikipedia article? Brianhe (talk) 11:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes so the second issue appears to be one of WP:COI. The articles have now been recreated here Shrikant Verma and Veena Verma (politician) by User:Anupmehra. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. It is just a co-incidence; I was working on Abhishek Verma and there I found two people who qualifies for inclusion; did an hour online research and finished the article. I noticed it has been deleted in past, just not that only yesterday. Anup [Talk] 12:11, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yah no worries. It was deleted due to copyright concerns. A fairly prominent family so no concerns about recreation by you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add here: File:Abhishek_Verma_profile_picture_from_Twitter.JPG & Twitter profile apparently confirm the Authorincharge's COI status and answer what he/she meant by "us". Undisclosed paid editing. Anup [Talk] 12:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James the article in question i.e. on Shrikant Verma has been coincidentally been created by someone else having no connection with me. The misunderstanding over COI and copy and paste thus stands resolved. I see no reason why I should remain blocked any further. Request you to please unblock me. thanks, Authorincharge

These are your clients

The community will discuss your case over the next week or and decide if you and your collegues should be allowed to return to editing and with what restrictions. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

Wondering if these are you:

46.105.86.81 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These have been confirmed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Authorincharge/Archive

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Authorincharge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]