User talk:Ontario Teacher BFA BEd

Welcome!

Hello, Ontario Teacher BFA BEd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 20:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problem IP editor at Plurality (voting)

Hi Ontario Teacher, I need help with a problem at Plurality (voting). An IP editor keeps placing inchoate text in topics, related to plurality, apparently using several IP addresses. See this edit, in particular, which is similar to a previous one. I don't feel that I can tackle this on my own, so I'm hoping that you can help. I just reverted a reversion the same IP made at Proportional representation, where you corrected one of his edits.

User:HopsonRoad 20:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Return of disruptive IP editor

Hi, Ontario Teacher BFA BEd--The editor, who was writing incoherent contributions on topics relating to Plurality (voting) and Plurality voting system, has returned with these edits. Since he seems to be trolling me, perhaps you could look at this. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 22:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ontario Teacher BFA BEd--You'll note the same incoherent language added below, on your talk page at "Your Plurality/Majority understanding" by "NewSpeechKiller". He's been stalking my Talk page, as well. User:HopsonRoad 04:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Related: There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JBL (talk) 21:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

found this

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		Thank you for being so diplomatic. I think your edits are important and belong in the article. Moscowamerican (talk) 04:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ontario Teacher BFA BEd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin O'Leary

Hi, there is a user on the Kevin O'Leary article making disruptive and partisan edits to the article, username is INeeDaFatToke. Could you please intervene or protect the page to stop the vandalism? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charles lindberg (talk • contribs) 03:41, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait for consensus on the talk page before making further edits regarding Kevin O'Leary's military service. Two editors have recently been blocked at WP:AN3 for edit warring on this point. Admins will probably do whatever they have to do to persuade people to wait for consensus. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston:, I restored the status quo version. It should stay like this until consensus is reached for a change. Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked online and there is 0 evidence that Kevin O'Leary even attended RMC Saint-Jean... He did attend Stanstead Boarding School (Which is the school he refers to in the tweet at the gun range saying it reminds him of his days as a cadet). The sourced website that this page uses doesn't mention anywhere in the article 'RMC Saint'Jean' so it could be assumed they were talking about Stanstead.

I have also checked Saint-Jean's hall of fame page and Alumni pages and Kevin O'Leary's name shows up nowhere... The only online sources claiming he attended Saint-Jean are pages that have copied and pasted from this wikipedia page (Which has no source saying he attended the Saint-Jean) http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/oleary-gun-range-shooting-thursday-1.3963724

I have emailed his campaign to ask them directly if Kevin O'Leary attended Saint-Jean or has any Military Service to end this dispute once and for all.

http://rmcalumni.ca/category/cmr-saint-jean-hall-of-fame/ (Link to RMC Saint-Jean Hall of Fame, which Kevin O'Leary would guaranteed to be on if he attended... Due to his success.)

I will also be contacting other Wikipedia editors directly to fix the matter since you (Ontario Teacher BFA BEd) are editing a page with no sources or evidence (In fact the evidence shows he never attended) and stealing valour. Then punishing someone for trying to fix it. Last but not least, this is the wrong template... Kevin O'Leary's page for years (Up until one of his fans, with no evidence or sources, changed it a couple of weeks ago). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:8D80:6E2:B74C:C0F5:8D1C:A5B:5D1E (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the IP. The material was challenged as being unsourced. There's nothing in the article that shows he attended RMC st. Jean. The sources seem to indicate that O'Leary was a member of the Canadian Cadets while attending Stanstead college, not that he attended RMC St,Jean. It's up to you to provide a reliable source when restoring material that has been removed as being unsourced. It does not matter that it has been in the article for some time. You restored unsourced material that was under discussion on the talk page. I suggest that you remove it immediately. Meters (talk) 19:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block

You've been blocked from editing for 72 hours due to violating the Three revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 05:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ontario_Teacher_BFA_BEd reported by User:Jon Kolbert (Result: ). Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked you for one week for resuming edit-warring at Kevin O'Leary after expiration of your last block.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1 admin miscounted. Self revertAlso do not count towards 3RR

Decline reason:

Admin did not miscount. You can be blocked for resuming the edit warring that got you blocked for 3RR. You self-revert, yes, but only to revert again shortly after. Above all other things, you fail to address what you did wrong—how you would do better. And why unblocking, in general, makes sense. El_C 06:47, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kevin O'Leary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This accusation is false

Decline reason:

This is a Checkuser block, so the technical evidence is very unlikely to be false. Regardless of that, a simple reading of the editing between the two accounts is convincing in itself. Black Kite (talk) 00:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ontario Teacher BFA BEd, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

freshacconci (✉) 01:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ontario Teacher BFA BEd, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

freshacconci (✉) 18:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]