Jump to content

User talk:ERcheck/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8→Archive 10

This is Archive 6 of my talk page. It is archived using the Cut-and-Paste method.

Below the line, you will find the talk portion of the page for September 2006 (Sept 1 - Oct 1, 2006).


Need some of your admin help if able

For the past two weeks User:66.11.160.31 has been reverting the intro to the Jesse Macbeth article to make it read as if this guy was legitimate. If you are unfamiliar, Macbeth was kicked out of the Army while in recruit training and then became the darling of the anti-war crowd when he came out saying he was a Ranger and participated in war atrocities. He has since been proven to be a liar by just about everyone except the user above. Anyway, I am asking if you could intervene with this user to stop them from making these revisions as they are known to be false and this constant back and forth is getting old. Thanks in advance for the help. Hope everything else is going good. --Looper5920 22:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

In addition to the last it seems that the above user has either taken a new name or gained a friend. Please add User:Jessefriend to the above situation as well. Thanks--Looper5920 23:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

List of reverters & actions

Note: Sockpuppet report, 3RR report, and Admin noticeboard incident report. — ERcheck (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Thank you for the help. I am editing on the sly at work so I have been in and out of the office and unable to reply to the message you put on my page. Again thanks.--Looper5920 01:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Nobunaga25, 26, 27....

Thanks for the heads up. Deepthroat123 has violated 3RR, btw. --Nobunaga24 00:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Those accounts haven't been created yet (I think). Just being lighthearted :-)--Nobunaga24 00:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
I believe someone else, Mmx1, has reported the sockpuppety, Don't know if anyone has reported the vandalism. I'm kind of doing my editing on the sly right now, since I'm at work, so haven't really gotten too deep into the whole affair, just a few reverts. I think Mmx1 and Looper have been battling this guy more than me, and doing a good job of it.--Nobunaga24 00:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Questions?

Is ERcheck your real name. If not then what is it and why don't you use your real name?

Thank You,

Aberon Jones Aberon Jones 03:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Opinion

Hey Er its me aberon jones. I just wanted to ask what you think of my user page. Please answer as fast as possible so that I can change mistakes or violations

Thank YOu,

Aberon JOnes Aberon Jones 03:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Question from KRBN (talk • contribs • count)

I want to ask you something; Do I have the right to put {{prod}} in any article? I followed that rule about not putting articles for speedy deletion but User:TruthbringerToronto stil continues to revert them. Instead of reverting, he could have discussed that subject. I think it is time for warning for block on him. Just check Christos Panopoulos. KRBN (Talk | 18:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Can you answer me another question to understand better notability? Articles about first team squad members who have not made a first team appearance may also be appropriate, but only if the individual is at a club of sufficient stature that most members of its squad are worthy of articles. I don't understand well that phrase.

  • First team squad means usually at the squad of 11 players or to not be just in young team?
  • a club of sufficient stature, what does that mean? especially the stature.

KRBN (Talk | 21:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Again

hey thanks for checking out my User Page. I was also wandering if you can delete my account so that I can start a new one? Please answer.

Thank You

Aberon Jones Aberon Jones 20:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Bye!

Hey its me Aberon JOnes. I have erased most of my user page so that I can start a new account. I will be back as JCYJ okay. So next time that you read something from JCYJ you should know that its me Aberon JOnes. Thanks for all your help pal. Bye (But I will return)

Aberon Jones 21:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

SELECTED ARTICLE

Nice! In the past you have played an essential part in the artcles which I have writen. The references which you have supplied me have helped me write good articles. I wrote a stub (and you know that I hate to write stubs) on someone that I found interesting and this is because I could only find limited information on him. The person in question is Fernando E. Rodriguez Vargas. I was wondering if you could find any addition sites that I may have missed with additional information that I can use. Cheers. Tony the Marine 03:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


Harrison austin

I think you speedied this, but it got recreated and the creator keeps removing the speedy tags I have been giving the second version. Do you have any advice about what to do next? --Slp1 12:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I have gone ahead and done an AFD (not sure I've done it correctly but anyway!!). Just so I know, how has the author asserted some notability? By the text in the article, or somewhere else I have not found. --Slp1 13:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks muchly. The clarification about notability was especially helpful. Have a good weekend! --Slp1 13:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Tonycdp

Thanks for your comments. I get the impression Tonycdp was trying to provoke a response. Unfortunately for him I have been around for a long time and know well how to keep a cool mind. Arbitration procedures are quite stressful and usually bring out the worst out of some people indeed. Thanks again, E Asterion u talking to me? 18:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Ta

you beat me to the TPV4, cheers muchly Khukri (talk . contribs) 15:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

yea noticed that just had one blocked who was leaving | MUAHH HA HA HA HA HAA on articles, I wondered if this one was the same guy who'd just changed his IP. We'll see. Cheers Khukri (talk . contribs) 15:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Sheynhertz-Unbayg user talk

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive56#Ban of Sheynhertz-Unbayg: if he wants to be unblocked, he should do so with his primary account which is old enough to bypass the semiprotection, not any new accounts or IP addresses he uses to edit. Ryūlóng 20:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


Help

I know u don't know me but i really need a little help. I uploaded a picture but it didn't go where i wanted it to. Can u tell me how can i delete it? please & thank you.

Baby16 23:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Viogfernos user conduct RFC

Hi, I notice you have had recent difficulty with Viogfernos blanking warnings on his talk page. I've opened an RFC regarding him here which you may wish to comment on. It deals mainly with incivility and mislabelling others' edits as vandalism, rather than blanking. I don't know exactly how this works, whether I'm supposed to contact everyone who might have a problem with him... but I figured you might be interested. Thanks, Fuzzypeg☻ 01:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks...

Has been a bit of a handful by myself! - Glen 11:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I replied to his unblock request

) - Glen 00:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


Thanks

Thanks for helping me out with Topchief1 and his vandalism. TheCyrus 03:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


Lol...thanks for the advice :) I used the blatantvandal template...but then I wanted to get ...creative? In hindsight, bad idea. Cheers!

List of Hispanic Medal of Honor recipients

Check out the "Photo Gallery" in List of Hispanic Medal of Honor recipients Semper Fi Tony the Marine 04:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Could you give me some critical feedback?

I'm basically satisfied with portal layout and portal article boxes; I'm in the process of writing guideline and welcome talk pages before showing this to the group. After we get some group consensus, we can take this off under-construction. BusterD 00:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

News

I have some great news that I want to share with you. Istarted a movement to have the names of Capt's. Manuel Rivera and Humbert Roque Versace inscribed in "El Monumento de la Recordacion" , which is a monument located in San Juan, Puerto Rico dedicated to the solidiers born in the island or of Puerto Rican descent who served in the Armed Forces and gave their lives for the United States. For some unknown reason these two names were not in the monument.

The thing is that my quest has paid off and the President of the Puerto Rican Senate invited me to attend the unveiling in Memorial Day of 2007.

Pretty cool,huh? Tony the Marine 22:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Vaughan Demographics

  • Hey ER, I did see the new sock, I commented on your sockpuppetry evidence page. Regarding the Vaughan demographics issue, the reason I reverted it to the Religion table is because that same anon (or someone likeminded) continues to put in the ethnicity table, but without any citations. I haven't been able to find any reference for the ethnicity numbers, so I added a similar (if not totally the same) breakdown, religion, which there is ample references for. If you, or anyone else for that matter, is able to locate proper references for ethnicities, I'd be happy to see it included. By the way, thanks for keeping up the vigilance with VW/JC and the whole mess! -- pm_shef 22:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my page!

Thank you for reverting my page! It really makes me feel happy when I know other people are there on my side against the vandals! :-) J.J.Sagnella 12:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

another thanx!--Juju 22:14, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Re:vandalblock

Sure. I'll watch out for edits from this account past the 24-hour mark. Thanks for the heads up. enochlau (talk) 13:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP

Please stop blocking peoples bots and their users. If you continue in this manner you will find yourself blocked. Please show respect other than ruining the work of others. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyereh Mireku (talk • contribs) 16:57, 10 September 2006 User:Kyereh Mireku|<font colour= "blue"

Note, I've responded on the user's talk page. User has a history of vandalism has been repeatedly warned not to try to use banned User:Kingbot. — ERcheck (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

The PROPOL CHARGES

Thanks for you, looking in to his weak and unfounded charges. I have read your assement , and it pretty much, out lines my concerns and begins to restore my faith in wikipedia that there is, really some rule of law here. Any rate. Thanks. Joehazelton 20:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Responding you your message, My knowledge of "depute resolution" is limited. Also, my time line with pressing Real life matters, precludes me to immediately peruse this until end of this week (Saturday) In the mean time, I hope there is AGF and the other parties are "reasonable" and not try the "game wikipedia" (an aside, I am a Noob, but I learn fast and I am beginning to understand the nature of this beast,as well as the very colorful and well document history of one of the admins,on the out side "blue water internet" which I have been dealing with and which I have don't "respect" (sorry, The facts on this would seem speak and i can back that up if you like) any rate, I am willing to debate, in a fair venue the issues I have, as long as the people, that have the power, don't do" my way or high way" thing, and follow consistent rules of augment -- see Logical fallacy. Quite frankly, my experience I have had, so far on Wikipedia, have lived up the what many critics have said about Wikipedia on the blue water internet. Do a google on this phrase "Critics of Wikipedia" and see, I have.

My agenda is pretty simple and self evident, its to neutralize bias editing on the Roskam article, since I live there in the sixth district and have a stake in that election. (I only let the facts speak for them self as well as the rules of logical argument). I will be well if the Roskam page is truly NPOV and Encyclopedic. Again, it would appear you to be the first "non-bias" admin pearson I have come across in my joruny in the land of wiki and with that I give you a <Salute>. Thanks

Tag

MILHIST needs to tag and rate Robert Lee Scott, Jr.. Rlevse 18:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

See responses to both of your inputs on my talk page. Also, just a minute ago my article on Gilwell Park made FA, so now I have another-;) Rlevse 09:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Little repair needed

Was wondering if you could work some mojo on this article.... Carl W. Weiss. Could use some help and might be a good place to slowly crawl back in from. Hope all is well. Cheers--Looper5920 08:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocking email addresses

IMO, instead of blocking email addresses, you should simply leave {{subst:WelcomeEmail}} (or {{subst:we}} for short) on their talk pages. That way, if they want to put up a username change request on WP:CHU, they wouldn't have to ask to be unblocked. Just a suggestion, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Huh?

You posted to User talk:Abrinezs@gasairca.com saying email addresses weren't allowed per policy and blocked them while simply recommending a name change to User talk:Mpmv8@yahoo.com. Why did you send different messages? Also, I know email adresses are discouraged, but I have yet to find the policy that forbids them (if they wanna be spammed, who are we to stop them?) Please point me to the policy you referred to here. - Mgm|(talk) 12:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

EMail usernames

I use "welcome email", but I see the point in your issues. Perhaps the signup page should be improved to read, "Do not use your email address as a username". - Mgm|(talk) 04:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Bhumibol Adulyadej

This is a FA on the King of Thailand that has had repeated vandalism since the coup started. I think it needs locked til things settle down, can you help? I helped get it to FA? Rlevse 14:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Someone already locked it. Thanks anyway. Rlevse 19:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Reverting on user talk pages

Please do not revert anything on my Talk page without discussing it with me first. Talk pages are intended for communicating between Wikipedians, so I feel that reverts by a third party are in bad form. Raymond Arritt 01:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Policy on copyrights

Hi thank you for the warning of course I will follow it. --Kt66 21:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

three revert rule

Hi there really I am a while with WP and I do not understand why it is possible that User:Ekajati can always delete past contributions made by other editors and delete my added sources with quotations and not violating the WP rules. Also User:Ekajati was quite active to revert and don't accept changes and reasons. I will not say I have done nothing wrong, it would be nice if you can check the edits and reverts at:

Why it is not needed for User:Ekajati to discuss huge changes? In the past this worked without problems - although all three topics are controversial topics. However I will not be active for a month on the articles this is to much Wikistress to me. Thank you for your consideration and time, --Kt66 21:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks and reply

I have replied to your reply on WP:AN/I. Ekajati 21:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Unblock of Wikipedia:Autoblock of 62.255.83.8.

Many thanks for your message - I am sure someone dealt with the autoblock in the time it took for the email to get to you. As I continued to read the autoblock message page, I realised that I could edit my talk page even with the block. And so put a tag as per the instructions. Many thanks again. --Hari Singh 23:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. DavidJJJ 11:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


Geshe Michael Roach

Hi there, it would be nice if you can have a look on my new trial to include the further development of Geshe Michael Roach. The sources are completely from Geshe Michael Roach himself, and there is no doubt about this and that this happened and published by himself in 2003. So the WP rules are - as far as I understood it for protecting people from wrong facts and the like - but not for misusing avoiding critical points. The sources are - as far as I can see not against WP Rules - the only argument of User:Ekajati for deletion is: the Sources are now not more present at Geshe Michael Roaches internetsite, but this does not deny their validity. I feel in that case the desicion of what to do should be balanced by the validity of the facts, the WP Rules and the need for a proper article. Please be so kind to have a look and leave a comment. I think there will be a ongoing dispute otherwise in the future too. As you can see the main activities in that article were either to include critical points or to remove it completely. Now User:Ekajati was seccessfull of completely removing it. --Kt66 11:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Dear ERCheck,
thank you for your answer, reaction, care for WP quality and comment. Where there are "review of archived versions of his website in 2003" available?
OK I checked the PDF files: for instance the "Letter of Replies" (18 pages):
  • the date of storing at my computer (download) is: August, 17th, 2003,
  • the letter was published by DIAMOND MOUNTAIN RETREAT CENTER and is dated: March 28, 2003
  • The letter expressing his attainments and relation to Christy McNally was published at www.world-view.org in 2003 because the "Letter of Replies" (18 pages) says: "If you haven't read Geshe Michael's original letter, you should get a copy from www.world-view.org under the quick link “open letter” before jumping into these responses.")
Of course this is original search in a way but the point now is to check if the self-source is in accordance to WP rules and can be used even if the publication were later removed.
Perhaps you could re-check the archive of www.world-view.org, 2003, quick link “open letter”, if you feel it is worthwhile.
Thank you very much. --Kt66 13:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

all sources could been validated

Thank you for your help. I gave the links of all the sources I used (or suggest to use for the article) at the talk page of GMR. --Kt66 14:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

last edits

Dear ERcheck, thank you it's not me, please check the IP's than you can see it. I think the rush of the new editor comes because it is a controversial topic, I think it's good to inlcude the bracket of controversial article at the tp. If you disagree, please remove it. Thank you very much. --Kt66 17:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Yes, thank you. I understood you from the beginning that consens has to been gained first. So maybe the template will be helpful. What about the critical internetsite, do you think it fits to: :::"Information available solely on partisan websites or in obscure newspapers should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all."?
User:Ekajati could give no reasons (although I asked) why the website is fulfilling that criterias, others argued that this website is hearsay, but if you know the stuff - although parsian in a way - it lists facts which are just facts and gives an alternative view to his activities. Also if you look the diamond-cutter.org site is dealing straight forward with the points which were named by user:Nat Krause as "between the line". --Kt66 18:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

tag

USS Firebolt (PC-10) needs a tag. Rlevse 13:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Your message

You say my userbox is innapropriate because it is innapropriate for wikipedia, in which case why not ask those with 9/11 tribute boxes to remove them :-) --Frogsprog 12:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

From WP:Userpage: "What can I not have on my userpage .... Personal statements that could be considered polemical...." — ERcheck (talk) 13:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

come on!

come on lighten up, its a tag that I didn't make myself, and it can be put on articles that are frequently vandalised! its humour!! --Frogsprog 19:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Ormus of Michtam

He did stop vandalizing the Morman page before you warned him. Just telling you. --Yancyfry jr 03:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you for clarifying that. --Yancyfry jr 03:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Clay Aiken talk page

I disagree; and the guideline specifically says negative information shouldn't be presented. Considering the MULTITUDE of discussion in the talk page about Aiken's sexuality there is absolutely no reason at all why this needs to be deleted. I feel the deletion is very much in violation of the guidelines and I will be continuing to revert it. Removing information from a talk page is draconian and I won't stand for it. We're not talking about taking something off of an article, we're talking about removing an opinion that isn't even offensive off of a talk page. I'm sorry if you consider potential homosexuality negative, but I don't, and I won't be bullied by the other Claymates. Good day. - mixvio 05:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I was referring to the others as Claymates, not yourself. I'm dismissing your comment because I believe you to be wrong and I believe once we allow comments we don't like to be deleted from discussions there's no point in continuing this project. I stand by what I said. - mixvio 05:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I can't really make my point entirely clear because you haven't been present for the near-year of discussion about this particular topic. You lack the full experience that is trying to get anything at all edited on that page unless it's offered up by the four or so gatekeepers of Clay Aiken's wikipedia page. I'm fully aware of all of the topics in the guidelines and policy and consistently relinking them doesn't change anything. The policy you quote says that information should be removed if it's negative or potentially libelous. Since "negative" is a rather subjective term I was extending it to you to make the distinction as to what you consider negative. And US libel laws as they are means that discussion of his sexual orientation doesn't really fall into that category. I will however point out that I find it rather irrational of you (are you a moderator? I'm not certain) as a moderator to continue deleting two sentences when there's a page of comments about those particular two sentences now. Having the two sentences there isn't even necessary as it's obvious what was said even if they are removed. It doesn't strike me as unbiased in the least that you'd continue to drive the point in. - mixvio 21:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • If I deleted a comment of yours it was solely by accident when it was lost in my reversion of the deletes. To this date I haven't deleted any of the comments of my peers even when they were gay-bashing me and threatening my real life information because I feel that crosses the line. The same arguments they're using in this discussion are identical to what they were arguing when we attempted to first bring along verifiable instances of stories regarding Clay Aiken's sexuality. I really shudder to think what would've transpired if any of them tried to delete the discussion off of the talk page because it was regarding "rumor." You say I tread on the three revert rule but the three revert rule doesn't count in issues of vandalism; as I consider the deleting of other people's opinions on talk pages to be vandalism (and the policy guideline agrees with me on this) where do we draw the line? Do you understand the catch-22 here? I see no validity in deleting the comments considering the vast, vast amount of stuff regarding his sexuality both in the talk page and its subsequent archive. I think at the very least you have to question the point in deleting the comments considering the dialog it's spawned in the process; it seems rather irrelevent in my opinion. - mixvio 22:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

1000 Friends of Oregon

Hi. I'm on a little mini-crusade through the list of unwatched pages and noticed you did a major overhaul of 1000 Friends of Oregon a long time ago. Care to add it to your watchlist?  :) —Wknight94 (talk) 17:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 19:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion

I would like to reguest your opinion in the following issue :Talk:Puerto Rican women in the military

Thank you, Tony the Marine 21:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for expressing yourself. I asked for your opinion because I trust your judgement and I know that if I was worng you would not hesitate to let me know. I expect no less from a true friend. Also, thanks for the congrats.

Cheers! Tony the Marine 03:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Good, that's what I like. You opened my eyes. Great ideas, take a look now. I'll do the note thing tommorrow (I added the El Monumento link), even though everything can be found in the references. Tell me how it looks. Tony the Marine 04:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Can you do an investigation of User:Lmz00?

The Lmz00 has been notorious for edit wars. This user should be repremanded for his actions. See the edit wars of rappers Chingy, Mase, 50 Cent, and numerous others. The user is known to revert articles. Thanks. LILVOKA 15:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi

http://billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003187154 Perhaps you should pay a visit to that website. To the above poster who thinks I'm "notorious" for edit wars... perhaps you'd benefit from actually READING the versions I was reverting. Unless you have a source that confirms that Chingy "performed oral sex on Nelly to help settle their beef," I suggest you keep quiet. Your edits on the Mase article were also pointless and incorrect, as I pointed (just two out of MANY of your errors) out in the talk page. Don't even get me started on 50 Cent. I suggest you read that talk page as well. That's your problem, too much editing, not enough READING. I also suggest you make use of spell check when editing articles in the future, although I wish you wouldn't edit at all, seeing as how you hurt Wikipedia more than help it. Anyway, have a nice day (that goes out to both of you). Lmz00 00:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Harry Brinkley Bass

ER and Kirill: I've written this article on this Eagle Scout and war hero. I've asked permission to use a photo of him. We'll see. Could you both look it over for military info, info box format, tag it, etc? The lead could use some work too. I tagged it a weak B-class for now.Rlevse 01:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Tks. Pls see my note at Talk:USS Brinkley Bass (DD-887). Can you or someone you know interpret what I found? Rlevse 02:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
I've nominated this for DYK (2 NC's less than 2 months apart). Rlevse 02:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Is the asterisk in the infobox a stray mark or does it mean something? Rlevse 02:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
VF-74 needs tagging and some work. Thanks for all the help tonight. TTFN. Rlevse 02:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
MADE DYK!! Rlevse 01:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Nadezhda Durova needs tag. Quite interesting. Rlevse 15:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Added to box the invasion of southern France, in article Operation Dragoon. Rlevse 00:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:HMLA-367.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:HMLA-367.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 08:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

This was the version me and Lmz00 created an edit war on

Thanks for responding to my talk page. I appreciated the help. I want to show you the version I worked on September 21, 2006. No vandalism, no weasel words, sourcing, and no copyright violations. This edit war with Lmz00 has gotten to a point where I refuse to answer to the user. The user cannont resolve this dispute without using inactive comments toward myself and others. It's just simplified just to compromise a fair look at the article without using too many links and notable likeness. And for the user to use 50 instead of 50 Cent, that just another way of saying a number said this instead of a rapper. Just look at the current version. The last time I edit this article was about at least a week ago. I asked for a protection to inactive users who choose not to compromise, and refuse to work as a community. I hope this version (I left above in the link) is used on this article.

This is the current version that User Lmz00 left after I ceased the edit war. And yes, this is what is on the article (and you can decide)!

Multiple use of name of Sean Combs. Here the list of words, Diddy, Puffy, P. Diddy, Combs, Sean "Puffy" Combs is located throughout the whole article. All I suggested was to use mogul or rapper, to cease the constant use of the person's name. (Inproper use of proper names)!

Mase still claimed the status of a pastor. The album contained no curse words and was not derogatory in any way towards females. (Weasel words)!

50 was in talks with Diddy to buy Mase from Bad Boy in order to sign him to G-Unit. However, those talks fell through, prompting 50 to make a diss record towards Diddy titled "The Bomb" (which accuses him of stalling said negotiations). In addition, 50 also mentions no longer wanting to make a deal. (Inproper wording of proper names, weasel words, and not neutral in explaining feud with rappers)!

Mase's desire to leave Bad Boy is primarily due to his third album not selling so well. (This is an example of weasel words)!

This has been discredited however, by the wider hip-hop community. Mase has also been called a hypocrite by former G-Unit member, The Game, who called out the pastor (as well as other G-Unit members) on his anti-G-Unit DVD, Stop Snitchin', Stop Lyin'. (Another example of weasel words)!

Ok that it. Thanks. LILVOKA 15:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Sock puppet help

im sorry but i dont know alot about wikipedia at all, if you could help me list those 2 as sock puppets id really appreciate it. the 2 (actually 1 user) is very skilled at wikipedia and can run circles around me , i know very little about the inner workings of wiki so i am at a very clear disatvantage. WorkingHard 21:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


If you'd like to see Pia_L getting ready to keep this going, visit this page, and then please remmeber all the rules about, POV, Harassment, Wikistalking and so on,...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pia_L/sandbox

She made this page specifically for a search engine trap, look at how she has used names in bold along with very descriptive terms...

This type of game can get someone killed quite very literally.

WorkingHard 21:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Are you available for a quick consultation?

Sorry, I wasn't. ;-)

I'm around now, if you still need something, but I'll likely be gone again soon for the rest of the evening. Kirill Lokshin 23:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, probably. Kirill Lokshin 23:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Don't spam

Please don't spam Wikipedia:Spam. I am advising you to no longer post any more messages to my user talk page, if you do I will report you to the admins. Thank you MapleTree 10:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)


Stop soliciting meatpuppets Please immediately stop soliciting meatpuppets. Please read the following from the Wikipedia policy on sockpuppets.

It is considered highly inappropriate or unacceptable to advertise Wikipedia articles that are being debated in order to attract users with known views and bias, in order to strengthen one side of a debate. It is also considered highly inappropriate to ask friends or family members to create accounts for the purpose of giving additional support. Advertising or soliciting meatpuppet activity is not an acceptable practice on Wikipedia....

If you feel that a debate is ignoring your voice, then the appropriate action is not to solicit others outside Wikipedia. Instead, avoid personal attacks, seek comments and involvement from other Wikipedians, or pursue dispute resolution. These are quite well tested processes, and are designed to avoid the problem of exchanging bias in one direction for bias in another.

You posted the exact same message "Could use votes to save this article [List of doomsday scenarios], thanks" on the following fifty-eight pages. This is soliciting meatpuppets. Again, please stop now.

  1. Talk:World War IV
  2. Talk:World War III
  3. Talk:Weapons of mass destruction
  4. Talk:Ultimate fate of the universe
  5. Talk:Supervolcano
  6. Talk:Supernova
  7. Talk:Space and survival
  8. Talk:Solar flare
  9. Talk:Snowball Earth
  10. Talk:Self-referencing doomsday argument rebuttal
  11. Talk:Religious war
  12. Talk:Ragnarök
  13. Talk:Race war
  14. Talk:Population decline
  15. Talk:Pollution
  16. Talk:Plate tectonics
  17. Talk:Paranormal
  18. Talk:Pandemic
  19. Talk:Nuclear warfare
  20. Talk:Nuclear and radiation accidents
  21. Talk:New World Order (conspiracy)
  22. Talk:Natural disaster
  23. Talk:Invasive species
  24. Talk:Impact event
  25. Talk:Ice age
  26. Talk:Tropical cyclone
  27. Talk:Human extinction
  28. Talk:Grey goo
  29. Talk:Gamma ray burst
  30. Talk:Fascination with death
  31. Talk:Famine
  32. Talk:Extinction event
  33. Talk:Existential risk
  34. Talk:Eschatology
  35. Talk:Environmental disaster
  36. Talk:End times
  37. Talk:End of the world (philosophy)
  38. Talk:End of civilization
  39. Talk:Economic disaster
  40. Talk:Earthquake
  41. Talk:Doomsday event
  42. Talk:Doomsday device
  43. Talk:Doomsday argument
  44. Talk:Disaster
  45. Talk:Destructive cult
  46. Talk:Cybernetic revolt
  47. Talk:Cosmic ray
  48. Talk:Chemical warfare
  49. Talk:Black hole
  50. Talk:Biological warfare
  51. Talk:Biological hazard
  52. Talk:Big Rip
  53. Talk:Big Crunch
  54. Talk:Armageddon
  55. Talk:Apocalyptic literature
  56. Talk:Apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction
  57. Talk:Apocalypse
  58. Talk:Alien invasion

--Iamunknown 04:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

MapleTree 10:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

STOP POSTING ON MY TALK PAGE AS YOU WERE ALREADY TOLD ONCE

This is not a legitimate warning it is spam, if you cannot see that please stay of the vandalism decision page, you have zero business being there. I am advising you of the following:

I DO NOT WANT YOU POSTING ANY FURTHER MESSAGES TO MY TALK PAGE, IF YOU NEED TO COMMUNICATE WITH ME GO THROUGH AN ADMINISTRATOR. BYE ! MapleTree 15:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

LAST WARNING

I DON'T CARE IF YOU ARE AN ADMINISTRATOR - STOP POSTING MESSAGES TO MY TALK PAGE, I AM ALLOWED ARCHIVE MESSAGES ON MY USER TALK PAGE. STOP IGNORING MY WARNINGS. MapleTree 15:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Maple Tree

Please check my talk page. Maple Tree has been causing michief there as well. Thanks! Mjk2357 15:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I responded to Mjk2357 message. MapleTree 15:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

AIV

See 24.60.41.165 on WP:AIV, he needs quick blocking, vio multiple test4's. Rlevse 15:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for blocking this guy and reverting my user page. He needs to be removed from the AIV list now. Rlevse 16:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

review request

Sure, what can I do to help? Feel free to email me details if you'd prefer. Best, Gwernol 16:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ERcheck/Archive_6&oldid=1221598382"