User talk:ERcheck/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions about User:ERcheck. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

→

This is Archive 5 of my talk page. It is archived using the Cut-and-Paste method.

Below the line, you will find the talk portion of the page for August 2006 (July 31 – Aug 31, 2006).

Your RfA

I am pleased to let you know that, consensus reached, you are now an Administrator. You should find the following forums useful:

Congratulations on your promotion and the best of luck with your new charge! Redux 23:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! --james^(talk) 00:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations. Joelito (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Yup – Congrats! --Murcielago 02:30, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

I am very happy for you. I always had faith in you and I know that you will be a great Admin. Tony the Marine 03:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC) (P.S. The Adminship plaque looks great on your User page.)

More congrats, welcome to the club! Yank sox 04:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Let me jump on the bandwagon and say congratulations and well deserved. No one deserved it more.--Looper5920 13:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! Enjoy your shiny new buttons! Kirill Lokshin 21:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey! its me Aberon Jones. I just wanted to thank you for correcting my mistakes. Congrtulations on becoming Administrator. Well Thenks!! Please call me back.

DYK

On 31 July, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ben L. Salomon, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Peta 00:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Couple of things

Thought you may be interested in this [1]. Seems to go along with the Portal News and is right down your alley. Congrats on another DYK. You are making them look easy at this point. Also, The US Military motto page is starting to become a beast and will need to be broken up. It also needs some pictures or anything to break it up a bit. May not be a bad idea to steal its USMC material and create a Current units of the United States Marine Corps page. One page that has everything. Would be great for a template link as well. Thoughts?--Looper5920 00:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Help with SpeedyD's

Hey, I noticed you deleted an article that I tagged for Speedy deletion, "Laura C. Monteiro". Could you please help me delete/process the following articles?

Thanks,JianLi 01:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Congratulations on your adminship!

from EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE

Congratulations on your recently successful RFA!

Don't forget to save me a piece of cake!

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME

Bill in U.S. House of Representatives contains one of my articles

The following Bill H.R. 3440 Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office Building Designation Act introduced to the United States House of Representatives by Congressman Luis Fortuño, contains the mini-biography of Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa which I wrote. What a pleasant surprise (smile). Tony the Marine 17:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I know this is a hundred years too late but...

Thanks 4 what you said in May

Baby16 00:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

2nd Battalion 9th Marines

This article will probably be hitting the Good article reviewer in week. Some things that I have noticed is that for an article to get to FA status it needs a lot of in-line citations and no red-links. I hope that you can watch the talkpage and responded to any comments from the reviewer. I believe this article could make it to FA status with a little work.--Oldwildbill 05:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Jose Celso Barbosa

What happened was that I wanted to find some more information on about the bilingual newspaper that he used to pubolish "El Tiempo". I saw that something was mentioned in a website during my search and I clicked on the website. I started reading the Bill when all of a sudden I said to myself "Man, this looks familiar" and then I realized that I had written what is on the Bill. Today I faxed Luis Fortuno both to his Washington and Puerto Rico offices to let him know that I feel honored that he would use something that I wrote.

Hey, did you read the message above? I also got it. He believes that 2/9 could make it to FA Status. Please help with the in-line citations. I know that you are better in that then I am. Besides, it is all in the External Links. I know that I am asking a lot, it's just that my time is now a little limited and the inline quotes system has changed somewhat since I wrote my last featured article (Before the inline references were "inote", invisible to the casual reader). So, what do you say? Tony the Marine 06:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

RE: Cake for you

No problem. How's the mop? EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 11:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

Qaamuus

I have tagged numerous articles for speedy; I only blanked this one because it contained email and other contact information that may be illegal in some countries to have publicly displayed. I have seen this done numerous times before, so rather than resubmitting someone's email address, blanking was the more prudent course. Carlossuarez46 23:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

2nd Battalion 9th Marines GA Status

I noticed that you have been working on it and it looks good enough for me. I'm not sure what we want to do with unit histories, But I like it. It would be a goldmine for me if it was my Dad's unit. (He served in the Airborne in Korea). If I don't miss my guess, yours will be the first unit history we've approved. Congratulations! I'll pass it tomorrow. --CTSWyneken^(talk) 01:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

No slight intended. I should have said, "you all." I sometimes forget which talk page I'm on. Anyway, congrats! By the way, there are two other listings under units, but nothing on the battalion or smaller level -- yet! 8-) --CTSWyneken^(talk) 11:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Wow! That is great news (I guess he doesn't know that besides Looper's intro, I wrote the article). Like I told you before, together we make a great team. Thanks for doing the reference thing for me.

It seems as if the storm is not headed for Puerto Rico. I just spoke to my wife's aunt overthere. I've been living in Az. for the past 17 years so all I get is "heat". However, my family receives the WAPA TV (Puerto Rican Channel) and the islands newspaper. Thanks for the concern. Tony the Marine 02:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Congrats on the GA. Keep up the good work.--Oldwildbill 06:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Chat

Oh, I know it wasn't a slight. You know that you're my right hand man here. He did write some really nice stuff up there. What I like the best is that he said "It would be a goldmine for me if it was my Dad's unit", I let him know that it was my unit. Wow, can you imagine, it will be the first unit history they've approved? Tony the Marine 03:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I'll keep it on the watch list. My speech and debate judge instincts are kicking in with these GAs. I kind of like to watch over my contestants. 8-) By the way, there is at least one more unit page on the GA nom list. If you are not involved in it, please consider doing the GA review for it. If you'd rather not, wade into the thing yourself and help it where you can (if it needs it). Thanks! Bob --CTSWyneken^(talk) 12:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Just Wondering

How do those new admin. buttons look on your page? Bet they look nice! Have you heard from your source anything about De Castro? Semper Fi. Tony the Marine 02:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Yep, I have checked out the portal. Some great images. But, the thing is that I'm always learning something new. I mean, that Sgt. Owens died on his first day of combat. You know, you never know how you're going to act in a certain situation. Sometimes the real heroes are the people you least expect. That's why I've always told my kids (when they were kids) never worship nor consider sports personalities or celebreties as heros. A hero is a person who is willing to give up all he or she's got to save someone elses life, even if that means sacrificing their own life and does it without expecting any kind of adoration. Tony the Marine 03:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Smith Plat

Could you look again at this. The page was created by a named editor who together with User:64.223.55.231 created a bunch of nonsense pages the rest of which were speedily deleted, and also added racist comments to them and Westerly (town), Rhode Island. I'm not sure this place even exists as a real place, I was able to find an old refererence to "Smith Plat" from 1887 but I think this is like a subdivision see Plat. --Brat32 14:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Coordinator stuff again

So, now that you've settled into your new adminship, have you had a chance to give any more thought to running for WP:MILHIST coordinator? :-) Kirill Lokshin 00:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Ah, ok; I was worried that my pestering had offended you :-) Kirill Lokshin 02:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Check it out

I'm working on a Template to post on 2/9. I'm inviting you to take a look. I think it'll look good on the article. User:Marine 69-71/Sandbox See Here!. Semper Fi Tony the Marine 00:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

i like your version better. I'm going to work on a "rack" version as suggested by Looper, then I'll tell you guys so, that we can decide on the version which will cause the least distraction. Semper Fi Tony the Marine 01:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

why was the "adventure running" page deleted

Hi there – i am trying to learn – why did you delete the page "adventure running" ?? I was planning to come back and update it. Bogdandumitrescu 02:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC) thanks

I couldn't find a proper definition ... i was hoping somebody will help expand the page ... but you are right ... thanks BogieD 02:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

since you're online

since you're online ( and i am done for tonight :-) ... i created a page called "bad water ultramarathon" ... but is it actually called from the place "badwater" ... and this page (without the space) exists – so how can I delete the page i created ? THANKS BogieD 02:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Take a look

Take a look now, I need input. Tony the Marine 09:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Dude, thanks for cleaning up my references/notes on the 15th MEU. I am terrible at those things. I promise that someday I will take the time to learn how to do them correctly. Cheers.--Looper5920 13:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am off to the rack. I will add more in a few hours. I have no doubt that we can get all of the requisite cites needed for the 15th MEU page. Yut--Looper5920 14:37, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The Truth

To tell you the truth, I didn't like the rack that I created either. I hated it (smile). I did something better. Tony the Marine 17:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: New look for the 2/9 ribbons

Thank you. I figured this way it wouldn't be an eye sore. I'm going to join you guys with the 15th MEU. I had to write an article on the Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office Building Designation Act for a couple of reasons. First, the website no longer permits access (Good thing I made a copy). Second, I wouldn't want somebody in the future to come and say that I copied the material for the article from the bill. What do think? Semper Fi. Tony the Marine 01:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

The bill passed the House on July 20, 2006. Now it's up to the Pres. to sign it into law. How about that, a Hispanic female General. I wonder where her ancesters came from? Semper Fi. Tony the Marine

copyvio problem

User is stealing pictures from Getty and massuploading them to Wikipedia. Please delete and give warning. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Spinster678 --mboverload @ 06:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Matter has been addressed. Thanks for the heads up. — ERcheck (talk) 07:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello.

I'm the one who added some pictures and all on 'Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti' , actually hes my father. Some of those pictures I found online and some he sent me himself. You can checkout my album:

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/shahzwar555/my_photos (The first and secondlast albums)

As for the gettyimages, I doubt they'd mind since I'm not using anyone elses pictures, I'm using Akbar Bugti's own pictures on his wikipedia link and pictures related to the whole situation. Also, the photographer who took the pictures a few months back Mr. John Moore is very hard to get hold of but I know they will not mind the pictures being put on wikipedia specially when its all directly related to my father Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti.

Please, consider your decision, I'd truly appreciate it. Yours gratefully,

               Shahzwar.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinster678 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 6 August 2006 UTC

H.R. 3440

I saw your query on Tony's talkpage. According to the official congressional website, H.R. 3440 passed the House by voice vote on March 28, 2006. It passed the Senate by unanimous consent on June 20, 2006, and was signed into law by the President on August 1, 2006. It's now Public Law 109-253. Hope this is helpful. Newyorkbrad 18:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Go to <www.thomas.gov> and enter the bill information. Newyorkbrad 18:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Request

Hey what's the big idea of taking a Wikibreak (smile)? When you get back, could you do youe "Ref" thing on the Pedro del Valle article? I think it could make GA status. Tony the Marine 01:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

DYK

On 10 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Angela Salinas, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

US vs U.S.

I appreciate that the American usage is "U.S." but Wikipedia convention is to use a common style within a page, and the page on transatlantic aircraft plot is written in the British usage (being a British event), so should use "US". I wouldn't be particularly bothered by this, except there are various paragraphs with "UK" and "U.S." in close proximity, and the mixed usage looks very odd. Bluap 14:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I do realise that the manual of style says otherwise, but that seems to be for isolated instances. Having mixed usage in the same sentence look very strange, and contradicts the guidance to use a single style throught a page. Bluap 14:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Specifically "If an article is predominantly written in one type of English, aim to conform to that type" Bluap 14:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

If you look at the page history, I had made the entries consistent within the article (with the exceptions of titles of articles in the references section). However, a few minutes later you submitted an edit changing a couple of the abbreviations back to "U.S.", while leaving the rest as "US". I suspect that you didn't refresh the page before making your edit, so hadn't realised that the inconsistancy had been fixed (in the other direction). Bluap 14:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Latest update

I know that you're in a Wiki vacation but, I bet that you're tempted to read your messages here. I received some help on the "ref" thing. Would you believe that Pedro del Valle might be the next USMC GA and that there might be a good shot for a FA status for 2nd Battalion 9th Marines? Semper Fi Tony the Marine 01:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election – vote phase!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot – 11:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion

I wrote the article Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office Building Designation Act, the first bill in history that contains an article from Wikipedia. It appeared on DYK and right away somebody "tags" it for deletion. I inviteyou to express yourself here:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office Building Designation Act. Thank you Tony the Marine 16:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Kerrywayneburgess

I warned him about recreating that article and he did it again. I've told him on his talk page that if he creates it again, I will block him indefinitely. I'd hate to see us geting sued. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, it probably wouldn't be a bad thing to protect it. But make sure he doesn't just put it on his User page or somewhere else. The article was ... bizarre. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks good! :) User:Zoe|(talk) 02:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Pacifico Student Cooperative Housing

Thanks for your advice. I have completed my edits for this article for now based on my own notes and knowledge. Feel free to offer additional feedback. --Hojosparks 18:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Aberon Jones

It's on his User page now, so I guess that's all right. His one contribution I've tagged for cleanup and sources. User:Zoe|(talk) 18:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi, its me Aberon Jones

hey I just wanted to apolagize for anything that I might have done wrong. I would like to request the deletion of my own artile entitled Dawn of War(JCYJ series) becuase according to you I can't do it. Also there is a page named Dragonball Z: Broly the Legendary Super saiyn which I made and is threaten by deletion. Please reconsider this becuase it is information about a Dragonball Z movie and it is all true. Please once you are back from you break contact me and give me further information.

Thank You,

User: Aberon Jones

thanks once more from Aberon JOnes

Thank you once again. I mean seriously I do not know what I have which makes me make mistakes. Thanks for ansering back. And I already put Creator Requests Deletion on Dawn of War (JCYJ series). Last time you talked to me you did not inform me about the Dragonball Z: Broly the Legendary Super Saiyn. As I said it is good informtion and should not be deleted. Oh and is my user page okay please check. Please answer me.

Thank You,

User: ABeron Jones

Reported Spammer

Yes, I've reverted all spam. ~~ Meeples 01:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank You for answering back. I shall read manual of style and other articles on how to write a good article and respect wikipedia.

Aberon Jones 01:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Question about Main Page On this day

I see that you are active on the On this day... feature. I have a nomination for August 21. Should I add it to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/August 21 or to the talk page? Or, is there another process? — ERcheck (talk) 01:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, ERcheck, suggestions can go to the talkpage of the Sel. Anniv. template. Please be reminded that the featured item (with the link in boldface) must be a decent wikipage (no stubs, no problem tags like {NPOV} or {cleanup}, etc.) with the date in the text, important historic events are strongly preferred, and hopefully the same wikipage don't get featured in another Sel. Anniv. templates. There is also the issue of diversity (in topic, era, geographical locations ....) and we are not supposed to steal TFA's thunder or re-use recent DYK or ITN items. I'm not trying to discourage you, but I thought I should let you know of the "rules" there. What would you like to post there ? I'm looking for a replacement for the 1680 item, anyway. -- PFHLai 13:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

The article is not a stub. The information is verified and cited in the article. It has not been in DYK or ITN.

On August 21, 1968, the Medal of Honor was posthumously awarded to James Anderson, Jr. — which was the first award of the Medal of Honor to an African American U.S. Marine.

Let me know if this meets the need. If so, I'll add it to the talk page. — ERcheck (talk) 22:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion, ERcheck. I've added a similar line to the template as a hidden backup item (in case one of the other items becoming a TFA, getting tagged for NPOV, etc.) I did not use it as a 'live' item because there have been complaints about having too many US-related items in the Sel.Anniv. section, e.g. Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries#USA bias in Selected Anniverary. If you feel strongly about featuring this item, please consider swapping this with the 1976 item. (I don't think Operation Paul Bunyan was that historic an event, but this year is the 30th anniversary. What the heck.) You are an admin, so you can edit it anytime. I'll be off-line that whole week, so help yourself. :-) Cheers. -- PFHLai 06:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I have a question

Excuse me, I just wanted to know how cite my aritcles. I would like to know. Please call me back. Aberon Jones 00:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey check out the Blog Article

I noticed that it has been suggested that the article "Online Diary" and the article "Blog" be merged. Could you take a look please.

Thank you,

Aberon Jones 01:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Redirect vandalism

No problem! Fortunately the software is robust enough that such vandalism isn't much trouble to deal with (just kill the redirects). Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 00:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Mark Crutcher and Life Dynamics

Though I placed the hangon code on the Mark Crutcher page, it was deleted within an hour with no discussion. The Life Dynamics Inc. page was summarily nuked with no warning, no discussion, no nothing.

I thought that there was to be attempts made at reconciliation, that users were not to simply nuke articles. And I don't even know how to find out who nuked them. ChristinaDunigan 18:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Sekort Sev Lewt

This seems to be a vandalism-only account. Not knowing the protocol, I posted this assertion on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Just thought you, as an admin, might want to know. Special-T 03:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Roy Adams article

I merged the the two versions. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 14:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

KRBN (talk • contribs) and speedies

Since you're an admin and I'm not, could you check KRBN's contributions to see if any articles that he inappropriately marked for speedy deletion actually were deleted, and restore them if necessary? I edited a few to remove the speedy and improve them a bit. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

New article

I'm not sure how wise this is with a new semester approaching, but I started a new article Military history of the United States during World War I. Maybe you could insert some of the exploits of the Devil Dogs into it? Thanks. Rmt2m 23:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Speedy: Repost

Thanks for the info! I guess that sometimes I don't read things as clearly as I should, and this was one of those cases. I'll be more careful in the future! --Icarus ^(Hi!) 04:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Just for clarification..

Why did you take the time to remove the db-repost template from an article that was previously deleted for being non-notable, and on the talk page the creator admits it doesn't belong in article space, yet not delete the article?--Crossmr 04:26, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Its still tagged as a speedy. I put db-bio on it as well and the repost just so that an admin would quickly know that it had been deleted before (I'm not sure how easy it is for you to tell that).--Crossmr 04:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

It was the same assertion as before, and if you check the last entry on the talk page the creator admints it doesn't belong there and that he's moved it to user space (which I think is also a criteria for deletion)--Crossmr 04:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

and I know repost isn't appropriate criteria, it was just included in addition to the db-bio template as a courtesy. I've never seen what an admin sees when they look at a page.--Crossmr 04:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Block..

"Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Ilovecutelittlepuppies582". The reason given for Ilovecutelittlepuppies582's block is: "vandalism only account"."

I am unfortunatly effected by this block, while I have nothing to do with this. Oh can you remove this block to let me edit at will your worship :) --Deenoe 22:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Block is already off, neveeeeermind :) --Deenoe 22:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject Newsletter – Issue VI – August 2006

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Humbert Roque Versace

Hey buddy, what you doing? Still on a Wiki vacation? Just thought that I would let you know that Humbert Roque Versace was promoted to GA status. I thought that Pedro del Valle would have already been promoted but, it has yet. Take care and let me know when you come back. Tony the Marine 05:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Update

Hey Buddy, I just wanted you to know that Pedro del Valle was promoted to GA Status. Semper Fi Tony the Marine

Quick hello and some limited input

Have not said said hello in awhile so I thought I would drop a line. I think we are both taken a well deserved respite. I see you have been learning the admin ropes and I have been helping out a bit more with the History project. Hope everything else is going well. I know you have said this past month has been difficult.

That being said it is that time of the month. Just wanted to get your inputs for Portal changes before I made any. If there is anything you want done let me know and I'll make it happen. Cheers and look forward to hearing from you--Looper5920 11:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Changes to MCMAP section

I made some changes on the MCMAP section, it looks pretty bad, but useful info. I don't know HTML that well so it'll take me a bit to fix the appearance. but, let me know how it looks.Gelston 20:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Please Review Your Decision to Revert My Additions

I added several revisions touting the continuing revival of North Adams, and they were nuked w/o warning on the basis you considered them advertising. That was not my intent. I am happy to add revisions that do not reference particular businesses or locations, but that would detract from their meaningfulness. jmconway 20:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

KRBN (talk • contribs) and speedies

Since you're an admin and I'm not, could you check KRBN's contributions to see if any articles that he inappropriately marked for speedy deletion actually were deleted, and restore them if necessary? I edited a few to remove the speedy and improve them a bit. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

If I put {{prod}} leaving the text, will it be ok for you? KRBN (Talk | 10:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

First of all, I have explained the reasons for the deletions. So don't blame me for such things. I have checked some links u showed me and I checked some categories with articles for speedy deletion. There are several articles which are on deletion and you say nothing to those users that put them on speedy deletion. One example is User:Merope, who puts freely articles for deletion.

As about your friend User:TruthbringerToronto, his problem for putting an article on deletion is not just with me. He did that to many articles o deletion by other users that they can't be included in encyclopedia because they are so USELESS and he insists to revert them from deletion. Just check his Talk page (TruthbringerToronto) And the most impressive on that is that he HAS NO IDEA ABOUT THOSE ARTICLES. That person is from Canada annd sure has no idea about most of the articles, especially unknown people in Greece and Cyprus. I think he is the wikipedia vandalist.

I want also to make another question what can I do if I disagree with the creation of a category? sure not for speedy deletion I guess. Then what else I can do on that?

KRBN (Talk | 00:16, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I insist that I have explained the reasons for deletions. I may did vandalism without understanding it but at least I came to ask you what to do. However I was suprised for you for lying that I continued puting articles for deletion. Your aim is not to not vandalizing rather than to block me. Because I HAVE 6 DAYS TO PUT ARTICLES FOR DELETION. KRBN (Talk | 08:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Alexander I. Poltorak

This article, which you've speedily deleted, may need to be restored to undergo a proper Afd (I am indeed concerned about the notability of this person). See Talk:Alexander I. Poltorak. What do you think? Cheers. --Edcolins 12:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your notes on my talk page and on Talk:Alexander I. Poltorak. You have done the right thing in an elegant manner. I think the article should not be restored right now, the copypright permission claim being indeed insufficient. It would be careless of us to accept the copyright text on the basis of that claim only. The issue of notability should also be investigated by the author first after reading the guidelines Wikipedia:Notability (people). Wait and see. --Edcolins 15:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

hey its me aberon jones!!

Hey Er I had a question. What is a freind of mine has created an original piece of fiction. He wants to post it on Wikipedia. If that freind sites his resources (example: His own websites) can he actually write about his stories. Please answer as fast as possible and if you don't understand the question tell me to re-write it.

Thank You,

Aberon Jones Aberon Jones 02:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!!

Thanks ER. I'll be sure to tell my freind and save him the trouble

Thank You,

Aberon Jones Aberon Jones 02:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)