User talk:Didgeridoo2022

Welcome!

Welcome! Let's share a nice cup of tea with biscuits.

Hello, Didgeridoo2022, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Adakiko (talk) 11:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Deborah Gray

Please find an alternative source. Discogs is wp:user generated content (WP:UGC) and therefore is not considered a wp:reliable source (WP:RS). See WP:RSDISCOGS. Thank you 11:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

BTW: This is your talk page. The content you added here should go on your user page: User:Didgeridoo2022. See wp:user pages Adakiko (talk) 11:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!Didgeridoo2022 (talk) 02:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Cascade Enrichment moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cascade Enrichment. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justiyaya 03:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ozjasz Wasser (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tails Wx were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ozjasz Wasser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 19:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Didgeridoo2022! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tails Wx 19:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ozjasz Wasser (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ozjasz Wasser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Please reconsider your decision regarding Draft:Ozjasz Wasser.

One of the consequences of World War 2 was the destruction of documentation relating to Polish culture prior to the War.

My interest is to attempt to record some of the Polish people who has so much potential that was never realised due to being killed during the War. I believe it is up to us not to forget that these peoples' lives were taken from them before they were able to show their true worth in improving mankind.

Wasser played a very important role in Jewish life in Lviv from early 1900s until his death in 1941. This fact is mentioned multiple times by the sources provided. These secondary sources meet the Wikipedia source requirements. They are all published, reliable and independent of the subject.

The Balaban book on the Tempel Synagogue contains the most extensive references to Wasser. This includes his biographic information and the tribute to him by the Chief Rabbi of the Synagogue. Below I offer a rough English translation of an excerpt from the main reference - The Encyclopedia of the Jewish Diaspora Polish Series (Lwow). It is a well-regarded and invaluable source that documents Jewish life in Lwow that was obliterated by the Holocaust. Wasser is mentioned multiple times in the series and it is clear he was one of the leaders of the Jewish community in Lwow from the early 1900s until his death in 1941.

Here is a translation of part of Chapter 19, Page 247:

"For twenty years Dr. Wasser held the difficult and responsible office of chairman of the Temple Management Board, devoting much work and time, money and abilities to this institution and trying to maintain it at the appropriate level. No wonder, then, that his colleagues in the Management Board, and especially those who had been following the pace of his work for years, decided to celebrate the anniversary in a solemn way, perhaps in part to reward the president for his efforts and diligence. At the meeting of the Board on May 12, 1934, in the absence of the president, Eng. Rauch-Berger to the fact that on December 8, 1933, 20 years had passed since Dr. Wasser was first elected president of the Executive Board. The Board unanimously resolved to celebrate this occasion on the second day of Shavuot during the morning service, and it was decided to read the prescribed passages from the Torah donated by Dr. Wasser, and to ask one of the rabbis to give an appropriate speech. It was also decided to make a photo album of the Temple and its officers and hand them over to the jubilarian during the ceremony."

The Lviv Interactive Center of Urban History is playing a critical role in resurrecting the Jewish culture and life prior to the Holocaust in modern day Lviv. The Center has done extensive research and the fact that they have chosen to reference Ozjasz Wasser in the roles he played at the Tempel synagogue and as a well-known lawyer, is evidence that Wasser was an important person in the Lviv Jewish community.

One of the consequences of the Holocaust, in addition to the tragic loss of life, was the total erasure of the Jewish people and community from cities like Lviv. This makes it extremely challenging when it comes to finding sources for documenting the lives of those who perished.

Thank you for your attention. Didgeridoo2022 (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ozjasz Wasser has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ozjasz Wasser. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ozjasz Wasser has been accepted

Ozjasz Wasser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ortizesp (talk) 08:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

I have closed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Didgeridoo2022, with the conclusion that I don't see any reason for regarding it as a case of sockpuppetry. However, I don't know whether you have read the part of the sockpuppetry policy which deals with "meatpuppetry", but if not then I suggest it would be a good idea to do so, so that you can make sure that you and your friend don't unknowingly slip into infringing that policy. JBW (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Rob Goodfellow moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rob Goodfellow. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Article requires more secondary sources to establish notability and verifiability as the current sources are opinion articles written by the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Suntoloo Panoom (talk) 09:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rob Goodfellow (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rob Goodfellow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Didgeridoo2022. Thank you for your work on Darren Edwards (disabled adventurer). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. Lead needs to be reworked into a summary of the article and to have a more encyclopedic tone. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

– Joe (talk) 11:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Didgeridoo2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In my country, Australia, you are innocent until proven guilty. Please furnish proof why you believe I have not disclosed payments. I have just returned from a wonderful part of my country called the Kimberley. I have noticed with concern that most Wikipedia articles about the region are outdated and I wish to update them. This restriction is stopping me. Didgeridoo2022 (talk) 06:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is not a legal proceeding or violation of criminal law ,but a private entity determining that you may not use some of its services based on its Terms of Use(which require disclosure of paid editing). I can't view the information that led to the block, but even if I could, we don't want to violate your privacy by posting it here. If you are not a paid editor, say so- this unblock request isn't a denial. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cascade Enrichment (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Newystats were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cascade Enrichment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Newystats (talk) 11:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Didgeridoo2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a paid editor. Didgeridoo2022 (talk) 22:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your denial is noted, however there is evidence that you are which is not outweighed by your denial. PhilKnight (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Didgeridoo2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Further to my previous submission I would like to add that I mainly edit to further the cause of Indigenous Australians. I do not get paid nor seek payment. I would really like to correct the misinformation in many articles associated with the Kimberley particularly the Yiyili people.Didgeridoo2022 (talk) 04:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have already denied being a paid editor. Your edits so far have been promotional, and you do not address this. PhilKnight (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Didgeridoo2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I, and many of my Indigenous colleagues, have been incensed by edits to the Adelaide Football Club over the last day. Even though the edit was subsequently removed it was on live space long enough to make a mockery of the football club that is dear to many Indigenous Australians. Why was the edit allowed? It was done anonymously. Why are anonymous edits allowed? My legitimate logon was blocked a month ago and I appealed. It was rejected. I subsequently asked for my block to be reviewed on 30 May 2024. Wikipedia have not had the courtesy to respond. Instead of focusing on legitimate editors like me who just want to make an honest contribution to Wikipedia, why don’t you focus on the elimination of the ability to edit if you are not a registered user?

Didgeridoo2022 (talk) 22:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a borderline rant. It is not an unblock request. In your next unblock request, you should address the fact that many of your edits so far have been promotional. PhilKnight (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have out of the goodness of my heart, replied to all 3 of your unblock requests. In future, 1 unblock request at a time, please. PhilKnight (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rob Goodfellow (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rob Goodfellow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Darren Edwards (disabled adventurer)

Hello, Didgeridoo2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Darren Edwards (disabled adventurer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Young Marco

Hello, Didgeridoo2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Young Marco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cascade Enrichment

Hello, Didgeridoo2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cascade Enrichment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Karren Alenier

Hello, Didgeridoo2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karren Alenier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)