User talk:Dharmadhyaksha/Archive 2014
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dharmadhyaksha. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 2010 | ← | Archive 2012 | Archive 2013 | Archive 2014 |
Nomination of Muslim Students Organization of India MSO for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Students Organization of India MSO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Students Organization of India MSO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 00:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Tito☸Dutta 00:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
help
Hi, I would like to have a second opinion about the copyright policy of PIB. See this page and tell me if it is fine to release the images under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 16:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- "The permission to reproduce this material shall not extend to any third-party material. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the departments/copyright holders concerned."
- But we can't distinguish which material is actually owned by third-party and which is owned by PIB.
- "The material must be reproduced accurately and not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context."
- All the licenses which Commons supports want republication and distribution and publication of derivative as must. We cannot guarantee that the reproductions would not be derogatory or misleading.
Because of this we can't use PIB images under CC BY-SA 2.5 license. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:32, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Hindi typing software
Could you suggest me a Hindi typing software— phonetic, free, full version, and must not conflict with F12 key, because that is reserved for my Bengali keyboard, OS Windows 7. Thank you in advance. --Tito☸Dutta 09:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Software... liek something you can install on your computer? That i don't know. But have you tried this Google tool? I use this for Devnagri typing. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:18, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Mahua Mukherjee
hello, you have to add a proper reference to your claim that she is a current member of the university. A link to a newspaper article will not do, since she could be a former member. If her name is also spelled differently, then you have to add a further explanation or reference to it. This is not blind reverting as you call it, but you are not properly sourcing your claim. Please ensure the appropriate referencing. Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi: You contributed to the AfD on this article and you list Hindi as one of your languages on your user page; could I ask you a favour? Prathamprakash29 has uploaded scans of three newspaper articles rather than adding them as footnotes. He's also attempted to add them to Talk:New R. S. J. Public School but they aren't showing up for some reason. They are: File:Annual Function 2008-2009.jpg, File:Plantation at School.jpg and File:Impressive results of school.jpg (I'm assuming that's the upper half of the page.) Could I ask you to (a) put the article titles and author if any on the article talk page and (b) speak there to what if anything they say that is useful to the article? As image files, I can't even try Google translate on them, but he has given the newspaper and date for each on the image page. They should probably be deleted as copyvios, so I'm eager to extract any useful information as quickly as possible. Many thanks if you can help. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Pratham forgot to add the extensions (.jpg) to the filenames. I've done so. I'm aware that they're copyvios, so please hurry so we can delete them as fast as possible. --Jakob (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah! Working on it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Many, many thanks. Could you write out the original Hindi titles (in devanagari) so I can cite? Feel free to ask me a favour in return btw :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 19:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah... i will ask you to unblock me someday. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- LOL, I hope and trust you will never need that particular service! Now I must go fit those into the article before someone deletes the images. Thanks again. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah... i will ask you to unblock me someday. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Many, many thanks. Could you write out the original Hindi titles (in devanagari) so I can cite? Feel free to ask me a favour in return btw :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 19:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah! Working on it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muazzam Beg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imtiaz Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Legends
Legends are not allowed to be added? Bladesmulti (talk) 07:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Everything is allowed to be added when adequately sourced. Legends, especially would need sourcing. Or else i have many magical powers with me which should make me notable for my own article space. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds about to be correct. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Conversation in talk page
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Narendra Modi are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.
- Is nominating a article which meets all the Good article criteria makes you . LOL ??????? Rudra john cena (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well... every FA has had met the criteria for GA and hence nominating it makes me laugh. (It actually wasn't LOL. I was exaggerating and just being social-network-y. David Crystal says that LOL is not necessarily genuine.) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
- Is nominating a article which meets all the Good article criteria makes you . LOL ??????? Rudra john cena (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello Dharma
Greetings, I had seen your contributions for Article Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and want to thank you for the same. Your effort is greatly appreciated, you had tried to make article neutral and encyclopedic. However I had also seen some users are involved in distortion and hard criticism, it seem they are biased editors. They are hard critiquing and beyond the limits, However I need you support to make it Good article and also to mock them for biased editing but according to wikipedia regulations. I will be grateful for your help. KLS 16:18, 26 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kswarrior (talk • contribs)
Rameshwar Dayal Dantre
Hi User talk:Dharmadhyaksha, couple of days back you said that I can continue to add more inputs to the article Rameshwar Dayal Dantare (Dantre) and now your are deleting the content saying that it is not verifiable whether he is dead. I need your help to understand the process so that I can upload or send to you moderators the death certificate or any other document in future. for proof of DoB, please refer to affidavit given to Election Commission of India on 24Nov2003 where his age was 74. By that calculation, his year of birth is 1929. http://eci.nic.in/archive/website_2/S12/10/Rameswer/Rameswer_SC1.html --Silaupura (talk) 09:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Silaupura: You must have received a welcome note at the start of your editing spree on Wikipedia. I suggest you read through it, understand it and then only come back to editing stuff again. All and all data on wikipedia needs to be sourced. I can't simply go and write that Rahul Gandhi is dead without any back up from a reliable source. If you have websources, you need to add those to the article. Giving it to me on my talk page doesn't really help. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi User talk:Dharmadhyaksha, today I wrote some sourced data also like:
- Year of Birth can be validated from affidavit http://eci.nic.in/archive/website_2/S12/10/Rameswer/Rameswer_SC1.html where his age was 74 years in 2003. Today that also has been deleted by you.
- His Plantation and Seed Bank work had been sourced from govt website i.e. Worked for the welfare of females through registered society 'Konhar Mahila Mandal' source: http://www.nbtindia.gov.in/writereaddata/attachmentNews/monday-august-05-20133-38-02-pmannexure-1.pdf page=37
- Led Vriksharopad (Plantation) and Seed Bank drives through "Konhar Mahila Mandal" http://www.epco.in/pdfs/Sanct_List_NEAC.pdf page=7
May I request you to please allow this sourced information at least. --Silaupura (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi User talk:Dharmadhyaksha, may I request a reply on above 3 points. all are sourced from government sources at internet. Allow me to add these 3 points on page of Rameshwar Dayal Dantre.--Silaupura (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Few encyclopaedic images that might meet
{{Template:PD-India}} See the images on this and this page. Soham 13:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Mate have you taken a look? Soham 16:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi! I did. But am very confused these days on Indian and American copyrights. There have been many discussions scattered around Commmons and some did reach scary results of deleting all this era's pics for lacking info on when exactly wee they published and when were they published in USA and what not. Have hence stopped uploading such pics. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, no problem. These can be very tricky and I did'n't want another deletion notice over at commons so I stopped to ask you. Thanks. Soham 17:23, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi! I did. But am very confused these days on Indian and American copyrights. There have been many discussions scattered around Commmons and some did reach scary results of deleting all this era's pics for lacking info on when exactly wee they published and when were they published in USA and what not. Have hence stopped uploading such pics. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Mumbai Monorail
There is an existing ITN nomination on Mumbai Monorail. I have made some changes and claenup there to help the nomination. I'll not get much more time in next 24 hours but I definitely want to see it in the main page. Could you please help by answering issues (if asked) Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#Mumbai_Monorail Tito☸Dutta 20:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oh great! Will keep an eye. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 20:35, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Please, tell us how this is notable? See WP:GNG and WP:RS. Bearian (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Please, tell us how this isn't notable? See WP:Too vague; didn't understand. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Comparison of Canadian and American economies
Thankyou for adding FATCA_agreement_between_Canada_and_the_United_States to the AfD section on US and Canadian projects.
There is another Canadian US article that is in jeopardy/ in need of some tender loving care. That is Comparison_of_Canadian_and_American_economies.
People on the Economics project have noted its poor quality and suggested it may be an AfD candidate Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Economics#Comparison_of_Canadian_and_American_economies. Jonpatterns (talk) 18:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Jonpatterns: Hi! Am not very keen on America, Canada and economics. I just happened to see the AfD and hence WP:DELSORTed it. In general too, many editors who delsort aren't really keen about the topics. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama image link commons
Firstly there are a huge number of unreviewed Bollywood Hungama files at Commons. Second, I am seeing an increased number of "wrong source" mention there. I feel this is happening there: an editor is selecting an image, Bollywood Hungama provides few other images thumbnail in image reel above the opened image.An editor clicks on another image. But unfortunately the image URL does not change there. You may an example here. They need to open the image from the main page. I think there should be a note for it. Fixing so many sources are problematic. Also, can you add an option "License review on hold" with an option of "custom message", where I can easily write "please give exact URL" (it is because I sometimes can't find the images)Tito☸Dutta 17:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi! I stopped reviewing BH images coz they were under lotsa questions recently. Don't know why Sreejith stopped too... maybe for the same reason. I know the link problem. I try to mend it when they are few and i have time. But if it gets repititive from a particular user, i simply tag them with file source missing. Let the uploaders clean their own mess. We have plenty images now and we don't have to conserve them. So lets teach them how its to be done. I hate to clean all the image sources and see that uploader actually doesn't even care of how much work they are making us do. So simply tag them and if they provide source in said time, we will have it or let it get deleted....!!! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Tito, use caution during license review I tagged two, File:Aamir Khan at Satyamev Jayate press conference 08.jpg, File:Filming of Rockstar film.jpg for deletion and they were reviewed. Soham 05:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi! I stopped reviewing BH images coz they were under lotsa questions recently. Don't know why Sreejith stopped too... maybe for the same reason. I know the link problem. I try to mend it when they are few and i have time. But if it gets repititive from a particular user, i simply tag them with file source missing. Let the uploaders clean their own mess. We have plenty images now and we don't have to conserve them. So lets teach them how its to be done. I hate to clean all the image sources and see that uploader actually doesn't even care of how much work they are making us do. So simply tag them and if they provide source in said time, we will have it or let it get deleted....!!! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tamil Channel in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mega TV ([tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tamil_Channel_in_India|check to confirmy] | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
hi dharma, thank for the notification but i think u were not correct on deleting Dimpy Mahajan's wikipedia because of many reason first of all it being that it was wrong of you to say that she doesnt have any credentials other than being married to Rahul mahajan. She was a big time model in calcutta before she went to the the reality show . She was awarded as the most Potential in galdrags megamodel hunt which was a huge platform .She had already done many a serials in her mothertougue [1] and even after marriage she got her own recognition in dance [2] and was awarded the best performer, thus proving my point! thank you and hope u will understand and not close and merge her site with Rahul Mahajan and if u hav anything to say please write to me on my user talk page as User: srimoyeeganguly And hope u have a great day ahead . User: srimoyeeganguly{T/C} 3.14 11 February 2014.
- @Srimoyeeganguly: Hello! The article was merged and redirected to Rahul Mahajan (TV personality) after the consensus of editors at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimpy Mahajan. If you think the article should be separate, you need to reach out to Wikipedia:Deletion review with your case. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
@dharmadhyasha firstly dharma i would like to let you know that i am not vandalising any public properly ..i am instead trying to make a point. and instead of trying to understand my simple point that these two people are separate entity and they should have their own identity, you r constantly insulting my actions . i just undid wat u majorly changed about a person . you were the one who started the disruptive behaviors and deleting public properly . i nicely requested you to understand my point . instaed of giving me an explanation for ur thus behaviour , u r telling me i should b stopped from writting ? u tell me wat is wrong with that article ?
also i would like to say one more thing . u maybe a gold star editor and maybe a lot of things more but noone gave u any right to disrespect any opinion anyone has .!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srimoyeeganguly (talk • contribs) 13:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Srimoyeeganguly: And what about the disrespect you are showing to others? The decision to redirect her article to that of her husband was made by many people. You have made 5 edits so far to Wikipedia. Isn't it very much possible that others are right and you are not? Also, i have shown you what needs to be done. Go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and say there whatever you want to. Please avoid reverting me. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Urgent Intervention
Namasthe Sir, I require your kind and urgent intervention on Harikumar Pallathadka page and its talk page. I feel that i am being bullied to remove the content which is having reliable sources. Just because he feels otherwise. Well am ok with the editing of the content but prejudiced removing is unfair. Sir, Kindly join the talk with your balanced views. Look forward for your valuable and experienced views on the same. Thanks. -- Bharathiya (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Stop canvassing people, please, as you have also done at User talk:Rayabhari. Keep it neutral. I'm considering asking for an independent third opinion. - Sitush (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Dharmadhyaksha and Sitush:, thankfully I have got both of you here. Do you have any plant to attend Wikimania this year? Tito☸Dutta 16:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hey Tito, I've no idea where it is but I doubt that I'd be there. I've not been able to wear my hearing aids for nearly a year now and that means I cannot hear anyone insult me (I was born profundly deaf). I've also got yet another appointment with a surgeon's scalpel sometime during the summer. Of course, it could all change but things do not look very good at the moment unless the thing is being held just down the road from where I live, enabling me to bugger off when I'm overwhelmed. I'd also need to invest in some bullet-proof clothing, I guess. - Sitush (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Sitush:
I've not been able to wear my hearing aids
two disappointing news in two days. ::sad:: Wikimania is in London this year. Last date to apply for scholarship is 17 Feb. Are not you in England currently? Tito☸Dutta 17:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't realise some twit had decided to host it in London. Makes me a twit also, I guess. That's a couple of hundred miles away from Manchester, where I am. Health and finances permitting, I'm supposed to be visiting a mate at the House of Lords some time during the summer and so perhaps I can combine things. I'll do some reading up. - Sitush (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Well... reading the Wikipedia articles of various Wikimanias, i don't see anything interesting in them; just long speeches. (Actually some articles look PROD worthy too especially given the COI.) I anyways won't be travelling so much for wiki. Tell me when its in Mumbai. Tito, if you are going, do enjoy your trip.
And why do random people come to me when they have fights with Sitush? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- You should go. It'll help in the presentation as well. See my talk page's Wikimania section too. Last date for scholarship submission is seventeen Feb, so, think now. Tito☸Dutta 03:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Well... reading the Wikipedia articles of various Wikimanias, i don't see anything interesting in them; just long speeches. (Actually some articles look PROD worthy too especially given the COI.) I anyways won't be travelling so much for wiki. Tell me when its in Mumbai. Tito, if you are going, do enjoy your trip.
- @Sitush:
K Hari Kumar / When Strangers meet
Dear Dharmadhyaksha,
I have seen that you have considered my subject's article for deletion, may I know the reason why? I see you are an Indian and there are enough references from leading houses of Indian print media to support my article. Most of the content has been deleted without any warning as well. I have gone through the deletion policies too, but do not see much reason for the action anymore, as you have already performed the required edition. The writer is a living person, who very well deserves a place on wikipedia for his work(s).
I humbly request you to lift the temporary ban on the article(s). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakshmikm (talk • contribs) 15:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WT INB RFC
Please post your opinion at this WT:INB RFC: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#RFC:_Inviting_Quiddity_.28WMF.29_or_Okeyes_.28WMF.29_to_implement_Flow_at_WikiProject_India_Noticeboard Tito☸Dutta 13:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Re: Discussion
Message added by Tito☸Dutta 14:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.
Notability - Zee_Rishtey_Awards
We are closing in on a year that it has been formally tagged and no reliable third party sources have been provided. [1] Without sources being provided soon there will be action taken. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- User:TheRedPenOfDoom, please see this (this direct link may not work in Internet Explorer, works fine in Firefox, Chrome). Tito☸Dutta 19:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for slight delay. Was editing something else. Tito has given you the right link. Although the award is just in-house award, it seems to be passing GNG, just because it has many pretty faces associated with it. Also, we have no written notability on awards and someday someone should make WP:NAWARD a blue link. Till then, the article can't be deleted on PROD. You may take it to AfD but i don't think it would be deleted there either. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 19:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- (e/c) But really what is there to say about the awards program? "The channel holds a ceremony where it promotes its shows". Big whoop. We can easily cover that in the article about the channel itself. I dont see anything where there is anyone talking about it being some kind of "prestigious" event that anyone gives any value too. There dont seem to be any "iconic TV moments" - its just one big annual advertisement.
-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
what is there to say about the awards program?
— What actually are you looking for? The first two pages of the link I gave shows articles on almost everything, from participants, editions, anchors, celebs attending the award, films being promoted at the event. For example see this article. I agree ZRA is not IIFA, but so many media coverage (in the search link I excluded Zee's own articles) can not be ignored. Tito☸Dutta 20:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- I am looking for something which we could write about that would be other than a "cast list" and "plot summary". Do we have anything about how the marketeers work their spreadsheets in the back office to determine who "wins" so that as they divvy out the "prizes" amongst all of their shows they get the best "marketing return" for this two hour advertisement? has the self congratulatory nature been parodied in comedies? do people wait to see who is going to show up in the duck dress? has any actor ever said "i owe my career to being named 'best husband' " / "I have been type-cast since i won 'best negative role'" and it has ruined my career"? Do the shows time their stunts and plot twist so that the awards previews can highlight the buzz? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- @TheRedPenOfDoom: I agree with you that its just a big advertisement. Such in-house awards are not at all notable. If i scored good in exams and my dad gave me a videogame, that's not worth nothing as "award" anywhere in my biography. I am seeing towards these awards as more like a show. The show that gets 2-3 times repeat airing and is hence watched by many people. I will try to look out for it's TRP rating or viewership stats. And that's about all the reason why the article should be present. Rest all info present in the article; the hosts, venue, nominees; is all just describing the show, similar to Plot section of any film. I am actually open to the idea that it be merged to the channel's article. But deleting via PROD is no-no. Dunno what other editors have to say about it. Btw, its not just this article alone. Other similar ones are Colors Golden Petal Awards, Sab Ke Anokhe Awards, STAR Parivaar Awards, Star Jalsha awards. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Btw, am also opposed to those biographies who claim to be notable for having won these kinda awards. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- *
Such in-house awards are not at all notable.
— why is it so? From the day corporate houses and business channels started giving awards, everything became advertisement and promotion. It is not and can not be BFJA. The question is how many independent news segments are covering it. Tito☸Dutta 07:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)- In general, if you are giving award to yourself, how will it be notable? Just the way we do not write "Times of India is best newspaper" if it is sourced from TOI itself, we can't actually call such awards notable. Also, if you look at it, the awards are not presented as "Best Actor", "Best Negative Role" etc. but are given as "Best Sister-in-law", "Best Husband-Wife" etc. They aren't actually appreciating the task the actors are doing but just the characters they are playing. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
if you are giving award to yourself
— It is not awarding one in a family of four (members). They occupy a large part of the Hindi television industry. "Award sphere" must be everywhere. Tito☸Dutta 08:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- It is. The Zee Rishtey Awards are awarded only to the TV shows that air on Zee TV. And likewise for other awards. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- In general, if you are giving award to yourself, how will it be notable? Just the way we do not write "Times of India is best newspaper" if it is sourced from TOI itself, we can't actually call such awards notable. Also, if you look at it, the awards are not presented as "Best Actor", "Best Negative Role" etc. but are given as "Best Sister-in-law", "Best Husband-Wife" etc. They aren't actually appreciating the task the actors are doing but just the characters they are playing. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Move suggestion
Hi, I'd like you to comment here. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Your participation will be very helpful. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:18, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792: Sorry! But i have no clue of the subject. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Aurobindo
Hi Thanks for your suggestion on the talk page of Aurobindo, can you suggest some one to start the GA process , its been a year in making!! Shrikanthv (talk) 08:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Shrikanthv: Hi! I have fixed the GA nomination template at Talk:Sri Aurobindo. Do NOT create the Talk:Sri Aurobindo/GA2 yourself. The reviewer would create it. Once nominated, the nomination is presented on various pages linked to the various projects which cover the topic. If you create the GA2 page, it appears as a blue link and then someone would think that someone else has already begun the review. Wait for sometime and someone will start it. Until now i guess many were already thinking that the review has begun. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Rawail?
To be or not to be! - Vivvt (Talk) 12:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Dunno....! Am probably going on a long break just like you. If you wish and have time you can take them all. I don't think anyone else will bother to do it now. So no rush. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:44, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Gotcha! - Vivvt (Talk) 13:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 18:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Tito☸Dutta 18:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maharashtra State Film Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aurangabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
- This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Nice Work Raman2511 (talk) 04:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC) |
Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Message added 10:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Tito☸Dutta 10:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Qutbi Bohra artcile.
Hello,
Araz5152 systematically removes changes to the artcile (including yours), claiming absurd vandalism.
I do not know how to deal with this user, whiout an edit war, since he completely ignores the sugestions on talk page.
Can you please help me get a Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_requests/Third_Opinion for this artcile ?
Best regards, Ftutocdg (talk) 20:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
NaMo Swami
A couple of months ago, we were talking about NaMo's quotes on Swamiji. I have started that one today. Jai Ho NaMo. Tito☸Dutta 18:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Re: Qutbi Bohra
Message added by Tito☸Dutta 04:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.
Confusion ? can the deletion tags be removed like here ? Shrikanthv (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- If it can be added mindlessly like it was then, it can very well be removed. Be happy that you at least got an edit summary. Removal of PRODs without edit summaries are also perfectly acceptable. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Message added 14:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Search with "Tito" to see my other messages in that page. Tito☸Dutta 14:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Help with Karna page
I require your kind and urgent intervention on karna page. As the dispute was settled by you earlier,people are again messing up the page with tons of unwanted,unverified informations. Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 07:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
THANK YOU Dharmadhyaksha for your help :). If its possible can karna page can be made fully protected so that people dont destroy the authenticity of the page by again and again adding their own personal version of story.Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 10:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Image
This image forced me to laugh — this image. Kya baat hain. --Tito☸Dutta 10:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
The Saffron Swastika
You are on 2RR, please use the talk page. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- I had already replied to you on the AfD. You shouldn't have reverted me in the first place. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shekhar Kapur may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |url=http://www.screenindia.com/old/archive/archive_fullstory.php?content_id=560 |title=Screen > The Business of Entertainment |publisher=Screenindia.com |date=6 December 2002 |accessdate=8
- She won several awards for her portrayal of Elizabeth, notably a BAFTA and a Golden Globe in 1998]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:22, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
I want to create a Hindi Wikipedia page for my English Wikipedia Article - New R. S. J. Public School. Also i wat to add map on my page. Can you do it for me or help me in doing so.Pratham 09:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
How to carry forward this discussion?
I feel these edits are POV (and some more too), how can I go about having a discussion with this person? He out rightly accuses me of POV instead.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh&diff=next&oldid=603501138 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh&diff=prev&oldid=603500788
Jyoti (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Discussion with Maunus?! That has never happened and most likely never will... §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:06, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Can you please properly assemble the pictures on New R. S. J. Public School. Also please tell me how to add map of the school and 3d image of school on page. Pratham 09:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prathamprakash29 (talk • contribs)
- They are good i guess. Sorry... but am not much active these days here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:06, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Ok, just tell me how to add link of hindi wiki to my english wiki page, once i create a hindi wiki of my page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prathamprakash29 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Test
Do you think it might be a sock edit? --Tito☸Dutta 05:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Shoba image
There was this actress named Shoba who died in 1980. Her article has an image in the infobox that was shot by Balu Mahendra (also dead). In that case, can the image be transferred to Commons? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Mr.Dharmadhyaksha! I appreciate your work in "Raju (disambiguation)" page.It is nice but in the list of People,there are persons who belongs to different castes other than "Rajus" caste.For example: Pallam Raju belongs to kapu caste but not Rajus and also some other people are present who doesn't belong to Rajus caste.You please provide persons who belong to Rajus caste only in that page.
- One more thing i have to say is "Rajus" is not a caste name it is just used by people.Government of Andhra Pradesh mentions & refers them as "Kshatriya" in its caste list and also in its records and it doesn't use the word "Raju" there.
- http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_kshatriya_raju_caste_a_forward_or_backward_caste?#slide=1 & http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_caste_raju_belong_to_in_Sikhism & http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_caste_does_Raju_belong_to
- Rajus is a forward caste in Andhra Pradesh and people of that caste use the term "Raju" or "Varma" at the end of their names.But, nowadays different other caste members are using "Raju" at the end of their names as i have said above.
- So,please remove people who belong to other castes from the list and provide only people who belongs to Rajus caste in that page.I hope you understand.Thank you -117.200.20.68 (talk) 16:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Mr. Numbers! The disambiguation page serves as a page of blue links where one reader can find all entries of similar names. If you see, the film Raju and the Iranian Raju village have certainly got nothing to do with their castes and their mention on the page. You are confusing this page with something like List of people belonging to Raju caste. But please be informed that such caste-lists are also not entertained on Wikipedia. Am sure you have met User:Sitush, which could be one of the many reasons why you are not a registered user anymore, who would have plenty many links to give you that would tell you that we do not categorize people based on their caste. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Some links at User:Sitush/Common#Castecats. The actual reason lies in the mists of time. SpacemanSpiff seems to have been involved in that particular thing for far longer than I have. The IP is almost certainly block evasion by Shvrs, as was 117.200.29.60 - the geolocate is slightly different but the ISP and topic interests - including the kshatriya hobbyhorse above - are pure Shvrs. - Sitush (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't need to talk with sitush.
- Mr.Dharmadhyaksha! then why have you written this in the reason that "sorting and removing other Rajus. Only Rajus with "Raju" in their name have place here".Thats why i have asked you,otherwise there is no need for me to ask you & listen advices from you & your friends. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.249.83 (talk) 03:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Huh?! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Mahatma Gandhi
Are you implying that by making this edit twice that the postage stamp has nothing to do with him. It was issued as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi, so this is an appropriate category listing, unless you really believe he is not on the stamp and it is not about him. Your removal is totally inappropriate. ww2censor (talk) 11:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Did you notice that the page already has Category:Memorials to Mahatma Gandhi? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
My requested moves on 28 April 2014
Hi Dharma, can u please assist me here if possible? Thanks, Aliwal2012 (talk) 11:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- @Aliwal2012: What kinda assistance? I have no clue on how those towns should be named. Am sure people who are interested in Projects that cover those articles will show up in some days. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- I need an administrator to lift the restrictions on pages for moving. Thanks anyway, Aliwal2012 (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well... once you have started this discussion, editors come to it and give their opinion. If majority of those agree with you or admins find your request logical, they will move it. The request is usually open for 7 days. If you feel that not many people are not gathering there, you may post a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject South Africa simply to highlight the discussion happening at these two talk pages. Am not an administrator myself; so can't lift the restrictions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 20:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DBigXray 20:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
please help
a user named neelkamala is intentionally making abusive edits in nitesh rane's article,threatened me to block from edits,saying nitesh rane is notorious for making xenophobic comments about gujaratis and has removed my cited content in other works section named "sindhudurg tour guide" and also adding personal tweet as a reference which not acceptable according to wikipedia policyAniketp007 (talk) 04:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for cupcake.. Gulzar deserves ITN nomination.. :) -Nizil (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
I've sent you an e-mail through wikipedia, so please reply.—Khabboos (talk) 18:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I removed unnecessary text which do not add info to subject.
- Ashok Kumar's awards not needed in Gulzar articles
- note telling about it won national award and info telling how are Gulzars words
- Simplified language
- Neutral POV - no words like "memorable", "clicked", "defiant than faux pass" - better we avoid them
- prayer which is sung in many schools in India. - not important and not provable completely
In short, simplification. :)
Regards,-Nizil (talk) 19:29, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Nizil Shah: I will keep my replies here and will invite you to talk here itself. Going to and fro kills the conversation.
- You removed the essence of Gulzar's work. If you ever happen to watch Aashirwad, you would notice that Kumar played a role where his many dialogues are lyrical. What you kept is "He wrote dialogue and lyrics for 1968 film Aashirwad directed and produced by Hrishikesh Mukherjee." which is seen in his filmography table and had no need to be framed in such a lame sentence. Kumar won Best actor awards and the reference provided therewith said Gulzar's dialogue writing provided the "much-needed additional dimension" that was needed for the character.
- Gulzar writes "words". Thats why we have an article on him. So its essential to tell how his words are. The note was additionally added for editors/readers like you who might think the reference is crap gossip newspaper. As we do not have a blue link for the author or the award-winning book, it is necessary to describe the source. In your edit you wrote "He gained attention for songs of 1969 film Khamoshi including "Humne Dekhi Hai Un Aankhon Ki Mehekti Khushboo"". and removed that he "did not gain much attention until the 1969's". Also, by using "including" your edit suggests that "Dost Kahan Koi Tumsa", which is another song from the film also gave him his identity. When you listen to these song, i hope you personally would also understand what the problem is. Until then i suppose you should simply believe the award-winning book for whats notable and whats not.
- Replied above.
- I would agree on removal of "memorable" and "clicked" but not of "defiant than faux paus" as thats how the source describes them. You may rephrase it but not remove it.
- Its important on so many points. Its goes to say that writer of "Jai Ho", "Namak Ishq Ka" and "Chaddi Pehen ke Phool Khila Hai" has also written a prayer. It speaks on the prayer's popularity on how its sung in schools as against to maybe "Mann Mohana" of Jodhaa Akbar or "O Paalanhaare" of Lagaan or "Tora Mann Darpan Kehlaye" of Kaajal. And what do you mean by "not provable completely"? That only means you removed text without reading references.
- In short, nuisance. :)
Also, please note and follow that Film Title is in italics and "Song Title" is in inverted commas. You have messed song titles' formatting too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 20:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)- Its OK if you like to re-add what I have removed. Yes, your views are not wrong. But it should look neutral. :) -Nizil (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! Have added it back. Make sure you remove only peacock terms to make it neutral in case you find any. Don't remove other information. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Its OK if you like to re-add what I have removed. Yes, your views are not wrong. But it should look neutral. :) -Nizil (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Nizil Shah: I will keep my replies here and will invite you to talk here itself. Going to and fro kills the conversation.
Hindi Wikipedia
I have created a hindi page on -- hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/न्यू_आर._एस._जे._पब्लिक_स्कूल Please convert it into hindi.--prathamprakash29 11:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prathamprakash29 (talk • contribs)
Editing bhumihar
Hey, why are you deleting info from Bhumihar page. VibrantBabhan 08:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VibrantBabhan (talk • contribs)
What?
What are you doing? Is anyone discussing other than here: User_talk:Joshua_Jonathan#A_barnstar_for_you.21? Tito☸Dutta 05:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Tito! I haven't been active much these days. Looks like you haven't been either. Am just doing bits and parts of election pages. See ya around. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Koenraad Elst (serious BLP violations in a BLP article)
There are serious, ongoing and long-term BLP violations in the BLP article Koenraad Elst (see also at the BLP noticeboard).
The BLP article seems to be unstable: Each time someone removes any BLP violations in the article, they are being restored - and an user is again threatening to restore all BLP violations "soon". BLP policy is crucial to be enforced. Because of the very serious NPOV violations in a BLP article, this requires the attention of neutral editors.
The NPOV violations were explained in great detail by the subject of the lemma here:
- The wikipedia lemma on "Koenraad Elst": a textbook example of defamation
- Meera Nanda against Hinduism
These links say among other things:
- Well, there you have it. The lemma on me has ended up taking this form because some militant among your contributors purposely wanted to “warn readers” against me. Please cite me an instruction for encyclopedists that names “warning” among the legitimate goals of an encyclopedia.
- Either you remove the lemma altogether, or you straighten it out and apply the rules of encyclopedia-writing to it. At any rate, in a encyclopedia, I count on being judged for what I myself have said or done, and not for the gossip my declared enemies have come up with.
- If Wikipedia wants to live up to its promise of being a reliable encyclopedic source, it will strike this and all sentences resembling it from its article on me. At most, it can use me as an example of how it was fooled by some of its all-too-partisan collaborators. Speaking of whom: the history page accompanying my page proves forever that some Wikipedia collaborators wanted to inflict on me the maximum harm possible, an attitude incompatible with work for an encyclopedia. --Calypsomusic (talk) 12:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Can't stop laughing...
This may be the greatest single edit made in the history of Wikipedia. Well done.—indopug (talk) 15:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hahahah! All credit goes to the most eligible CM to be. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding me in the DYK. But why don't you make it about the rat-eating thing? "DYK that JRM, the new CM of Bihar, had encouraged people to eat rats during a food crisis in the state in 2008." The current one is a little too political, and doesn't mention that he was cleared of all charges.—indopug (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- You are welcome! Some editors might not like the rat thing. In fact, am guessing the info would also be removed by some from the article. Some IPs have already tried doing that. Also, we do not promote negative-highlights of people in DYK. Having said that, "alleged scam involvement" is no positive either. But for politicians its routine I suppose. If you wish to add another hook or clarify on his absolution, you can suggest alternatives there. Let DYK admins and reviewers do some brain scratching. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Redtigerxyz Talk 19:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Please see question on your DYK review on the above template. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
OTRS issue
Could you check the OTRS validity here? Tito☸Dutta 09:19, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jitan Ram Manjhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Image file rename and edit required
Hi Dharma,
- I was editing the OFB page and came across two files whose names seem to be incorrect:
File:OFB logo. jpg.jpg
File:Ordnance Factories Voard (OFB)'s stamp.jpg
Could you please rename them and the first one is not centrally aligned and needs to be cropped. Also, the name of the article should be "Ordnance Factory Board" and not Ordnance Factories Board. Thanks in advance and keep up the good work! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.151.205 (talk) 19:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Knock it Off
With the deletions on the Death page. We have a standard format we employ for all entries. Politicians are listed with affiliated offices that are contained on Wiki. That is the way we do things. If you do not like it, take it to the Talk page. If you unlist it again, I will seek necessary remedies involving Vandalism and the 3/24 rule.Sunnydoo (talk) 08:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Woooo!!!! Am scared! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- A lot of work goes into the page. We have a continual parade of vandals who wish to disrupt the flow of information. It is not appreciated when people who doesnt normally contribute come along and start making wholesale changes when there are policies in place on how things are done. If you wish to join the discussion on policy or contribute then do so. But please refrain from being a disruptive force. There is a wide body of information (2 months are up until the 7th) to see how the information is recorded.Sunnydoo (talk) 09:17, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
WikiHates
I love your "WikiHates" section. It's a really cool way to relativize your own importance. Good! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Gemini FAC
Hi, I think you would like to post your comments at the current FAC of Gemini (2002 Tamil film), as more "support" tags are needed for it to be promoted. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- I know you don't edit cinema related article, but you can still review the article as it's currently a FAC, can't you? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Am so sorry.... Am not as active as before. Plus I know nothing of South Indian films. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Not even for prose and quality checking do you have time? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Am so sorry.... Am not as active as before. Plus I know nothing of South Indian films. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
New user with many new pages
The Siddha has created a number of pages, I doubt if these pages are any original, I remember having a Afd with you, it was about some List of Indian monarchs. Same article has been created by the new user. You may want to check. OccultZone (Talk) 19:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- @OccultZone:, I guess @Sitush: is active again and would help more in these caste-religion-region-warrior intersection lists. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Blocked, new articles deleted as CSD G5 and a case filed at SPI. It's yet another sock of Rockin It Loud (talk · contribs). - Sitush (talk) 06:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- CAKrutesh should be checked. I am sure that it is not a sock puppet, but I wanted to know if any of those articles are important? Or they are also duplicate articles. They are violating copyrights. OccultZone (Talk) 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker), Well, if they are copyvios then they need either to be rephrased or deleted. My suspicion is that Vidhan Sabha constituencies probably are inherently notable and they could serve some sort of useful purpose by providing a home for lists of elected politicians who are (of course) inherently notable. Personally, I think they're usually trivial things & unlikely ever to amount to much but I doubt that the wider community would agree with me. - Sitush (talk) 06:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Only 1 article was a copyvio, rest were fair. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 01:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker), Well, if they are copyvios then they need either to be rephrased or deleted. My suspicion is that Vidhan Sabha constituencies probably are inherently notable and they could serve some sort of useful purpose by providing a home for lists of elected politicians who are (of course) inherently notable. Personally, I think they're usually trivial things & unlikely ever to amount to much but I doubt that the wider community would agree with me. - Sitush (talk) 06:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- CAKrutesh should be checked. I am sure that it is not a sock puppet, but I wanted to know if any of those articles are important? Or they are also duplicate articles. They are violating copyrights. OccultZone (Talk) 08:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Blocked, new articles deleted as CSD G5 and a case filed at SPI. It's yet another sock of Rockin It Loud (talk · contribs). - Sitush (talk) 06:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Jitan Ram Manjhi
On 12 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jitan Ram Manjhi, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jitan Ram Manjhi was asked to resign the day after he was sworn in as Bihar's cabinet minister in 2005? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jitan Ram Manjhi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK
Hello Dharmadhyaksha, Zanhe has raised a possible issue about the hook you proposed here. Please take a look. Thanks, Jim Carter (talk) 05:35, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry! Kinda busy now... Will reply in 1-2 days. Probably its best to create a small stub of B. R. Films. It can then be expanded and made into different DYK someday soon. If you plan to work on it, do it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for late reply. I missed this message. I'm a bit busy this days so you can create it if you like to. Jim Carter (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
You beat me to it. I have offered an ALT hook that may be abit more interesting. Your thoughts? Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oh yeah... Alt1 is better. I will strike off the original one. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I "spoke" with the nominator on his talk page, and he wishes to withdraw. The one lone delete really lacks clue, so I think a close as keep under WP:SK or WP:SNOW is certain. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Reliable or not ???
Copied from Sitush's talk page (He is having health issues): I'm having trouble to understand if thisthis, this, this, this, this, this and this are reliable websites or not. I know you are an expert in India related topics so I thought if you can take a look and tell me which are reliable and which are not. Thank you very much. Jim Carter (talk) 18:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on Sitush's talk page, Please take a look. Thanks, 07:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim Cartar (talk • contribs)
DYK for H. S. Rawail
On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article H. S. Rawail, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bollywood director Rahul Rawail paid tribute to his father H. S. Rawail's film Sunghursh (1968) by titling one of his films as Jeevan Ek Sanghursh (1990)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/H. S. Rawail. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Rahul Rawail
On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rahul Rawail, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bollywood director Rahul Rawail paid tribute to his father H. S. Rawail's film Sunghursh (1968) by titling one of his films as Jeevan Ek Sanghursh (1990)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Sunghursh
On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sunghursh, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bollywood director Rahul Rawail paid tribute to his father H. S. Rawail's film Sunghursh (1968) by titling one of his films as Jeevan Ek Sanghursh (1990)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Jeevan Ek Sanghursh
On 19 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jeevan Ek Sanghursh, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bollywood director Rahul Rawail paid tribute to his father H. S. Rawail's film Sunghursh (1968) by titling one of his films as Jeevan Ek Sanghursh (1990)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Loksatta
I saw that you had the article moved back again. I've had to undo cut and paste moves at least twice on this (all in the deleted history), it's a constant target of the party publicists, so you may have to keep a regular watch on this -- apparently it got hijacked again when I was away. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 05:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
—Khabboos (talk) 15:11, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Ek Hi Raasta (1956 film)
On 21 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ek Hi Raasta (1956 film), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1956 Hindi film Ek Hi Raasta was Dadasaheb Phalke Award winner B. R. Chopra's first film as producer under his banner B. R. Films? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ek Hi Raasta (1956 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Materialscientist 08:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry I forgot to add you in credit list. So, manually... Jim Carter (talk) 08:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sadhana chudidar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sadhana chudidar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Dusari Goshta has been nominated for Did You Know
Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. Dusari Goshta, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated for Did you know consideration to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk) 02:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC) |
DYK for Swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi
On 23 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Narendra Modi's swearing-in ceremony (pictured) was the first for an Indian Prime Minister to which the head-of-government of every SAARC country was invited? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK,
Will you pl help with DYK? Mobile_Seva Yogesh Khandke (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry! Can't help. No time. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nevermind! Yogesh Khandke (talk) 17:15, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Dusari Goshta
On 25 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dusari Goshta, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Dusari Goshta, a biopic on ex-Home Affairs minister Sushilkumar Shinde, was screened at the residence of the President of India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dusari Goshta. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Consider watching the B. R. Ambedkar page.
Hello brother, Thanks for your edit on B. R. Ambedkar page. You can't Imagine how happy I am for I found you. Please also add the page to your watch-list so that it can be prevented from non-constructive edits done by some users. I am not a frequent user on Wikipedia. Many many hugs to you friend. With hugs, Siddheart (talk) 07:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Kedar Joshi
Hi Dharmadhyaksha, I today noticed your deletion request at Pa.wiki. That time we did not have any admin, so your request went un noticed. Just now, I have deleted that article. :) --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 00:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Vigyani: Hi! And sorry for late reply. It totally slipped my mind that you had posted on my talk page while I was away on break. Thanks for the deletion. And congrats for the new adminship. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks . --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 06:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
Thankyou for your edits on B.R. Ambedkar page. Akhil Bharathan (talk) 12:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Kuru family tree
Hi Dharmadhyaksha. I have returned the Kuru family tree to the Mahabharata article but left it also in the Kuru kingdom article. The tree was devised specifically to clarify and illustrate the MB story so I feel it belongs in there. But I would also question its suitability without editing for the Kuru Kingdom article since that article is intended to be a historic article, and the claims of divine birth, Gandhari's hundred sons and so on are definitely not appropriate for such an article, while they do directly reflect the MB story. If the Kuru Kingdom article is put solely in the context of Indian mythology then of course it would be different, but I don't read it as such. Thanks, Imc (talk) 07:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
hi
hi dharmadhyaksha — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.6.208 (talk) 11:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Interesting work.
Hi, since you are bored, you might find reviewing this interesting. Thanks. Wishes.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 08:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Foreign policy of Narendra Modi has been nominated for Did You Know
Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. Foreign policy of Narendra Modi, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated for Did you know consideration to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk) 22:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC) |
reply
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I replied on List of vegetables in Assam. (struckthrough the template as it isnt working the way i intend)174.3.125.23 (talk) 06:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit on ABISY.
Appreciate your prompt review of the Article. AmritasyaPutra✍ 12:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC) |
Parchure
I took a stab at correcting that section myself. If you're dissatisfied with it I quite understand, but would you mind waiting until I finish the CE (I'll remove the in use tag) and then tweak as you see fit? Else we'll be edit-conflicting all over the place, as we just did a minute ago (and which was why I reverted you.) Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Fine! Will wait till then. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Foreign policy of Narendra Modi
On 26 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Foreign policy of Narendra Modi, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in pursuit of his foreign policy objectives, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made an official visit to Nepal and was the first foreign leader to address that country's parliament? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Foreign policy of Narendra Modi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Ravindra Prabhat's spamming on multiple wikis
Some editors have been using various Wikipedias to promote the author Ravindra Prabhat by creating numerous non-notable articles of books, periodicals, etc. written and/or edited by subject. Following is a track of deletion processes of them all. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Prabhat Books Afd
This is not directly of relevance to the running AfD, so I am posting here instead. Perhaps a month back, there was a big long discussion on Hindi Wikipedia Chaupal about all this. If I remember correctly, it was sufficiently proved that one main editor on these articles is directly related to the subject and the others also have some sort of connection. I will try to find the entire conversation and post the link here. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 12:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- hi:विकिपीडिया:चौपाल/पुरालेख 35 carries lot of discussion related to this matter.--Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 22:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oh! Thanks. Will go through it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Cinemas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Little Help
Your user page depicts you belong to Maharashtra state. Can you give proper caption to image used in Attire section. I found a great file but giving a suitable caption seems very difficult. Please help.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 09:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Done. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, appreciate it.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 12:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hello mate. I have reverted this. I was told by a very experienced user that we only use posters here, not DVD covers. Also image is not same, the current image is film poster while the previous one is DVD cover.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, appreciate it.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 12:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Template:Hinduism and its other related topics
Sir,Since the Om symbol which was present before my edit and after you reverted to the same symbol does not represent the original symbol and my symbol is more suitable because of following reasons:-
- My edited symbol show the saffror or 'kesariya' and 'bhagya' color which is used by most hindu temples,organizations etc whereas Red color of Om is not recognized by any hindu scriputures as well.
- My Om symbol is surrounded by a circle which represents the dawn time of sun or 'suryodaya' to which is an daily excercise by normal hindu.
Kindly rechange the om symbol as soon as possible. Your sincerely, Pradyumna Singh, A true Hindu. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradyumnas741 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Pradyumnas741: Your reasons are not quite rational. Just to contradict those there are reasons to use old symbol or create more new symbols too. Red is the colour of kumkum and traditionally and in routine kumkum is used to create Om or swastika symbols in Hinduism. Hence red can also be used. Your suryodaya logic is really farfetched. To contradict that I can also say that non-circled Om indicates more openness and freedom; it also indicates Akasha, which is one of the pancha mahabhootas. In addition, adding aesthetic aspect, when the whole template is saffron, the red om adds a contrast and looks even better. Am reverting you again. I suppose if you want it your way, you should propose at Wikipedia talk:Hinduism-related topics notice board or Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics and get WP:CONSENSUS there from other editors too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Vermilion or Sindoor or Kumkum denotes that a woman is married in many Hindu communities not Hinduism whereas Tilak which is applied to us by pundits in temples is made up by mixing of kumkum with turmeric(haldi) and chandan or obtained by from saffron .
In Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism), the deep saffron color is associated with sacrifice, religious abstinence, quest for light and salvation. Saffron or "Bhagwa" is the most sacred color for the Hindus and is often worn by Sanyasis who have left their home in search of the ultimate truth.And coming to the encircle Om,Since Hinduism is only religion in world which depends on the perception and interpretation You can say that non-circled Om indicates more openness and freedom; it also indicates Akasha, which is one of the pancha mahabhootas but from my pint of view its the protection of Hinduism from evil spirits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradyumnas741 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- I can't beat your logic by being rational. So please choose one of the above suggested venues to open your discussion and get consensus from there. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Hindu Political parties
I'm curious as to why you removed that tag from a couple of places; it seems to me that if it applies anywhere, it applies to the BJP and BJS pages. Categorization is not something I spend much time doing, so I thought I'd ask you for an explanation. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, what do they even mean by that category? Are all members of these parties supposed to be Hindu? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- I admit it isn't the best, but I would imagine it means "parties which subscribe to Hindutva" which is a more specific set than just the "Hindutva" category. Vanamonde93 (talk) 14:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, Hinduism and Hindutva are different. When referring it as "Hindu political parties", it more inclines to the common usage as Hinduism and not Hindutva. Apart from that minor name change error, do all the parties in that category really "subscribe" to any specific religion? Am not talking just about the Hindu one, but also others in Category:Religious political parties. And what is this subscription extent needed? These parties do have non-Hindu members in them and also include non-Hindu masses in their plans. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- That is a little simplistic, is it not? Sure, they have Muslim members, and Sikh members, and Christian members; but there are also literally hundreds of academic references that discuss the fact of their "exclusionary" or "chauvinistic" ideology, based on Hinduism being the "primary" Indian religion/identity. Now I agree that the name was not ideal; but there is a set of parties, and therefore Wikipedia articles, that consists essentially of the overlap between "Hindutva," "Religious political parties," and "Indian political parties," and it is a set with multiple members. To me, this makes it seem like there should be a category for such, but like I said, I have not worked too much with categories. Do you disagree? Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, Hinduism and Hindutva are different. When referring it as "Hindu political parties", it more inclines to the common usage as Hinduism and not Hindutva. Apart from that minor name change error, do all the parties in that category really "subscribe" to any specific religion? Am not talking just about the Hindu one, but also others in Category:Religious political parties. And what is this subscription extent needed? These parties do have non-Hindu members in them and also include non-Hindu masses in their plans. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- I admit it isn't the best, but I would imagine it means "parties which subscribe to Hindutva" which is a more specific set than just the "Hindutva" category. Vanamonde93 (talk) 14:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Wiki commons deletion
I was trying to find the deletion log on the two images of mine that you have deleted. I need to actually request a temporary undeletion for say a week. There is a discussion going on at Asansol Junction railway station where it is needed.
Superfast1111 (talk) 16:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Superfast1111! Do you know which image you are talking about? The three images you uploaded that were deleted are File:Bombay railnetwork.jpg , File:Station name - 1.jpg and File:Station name - 1.jpg. Which one are you talking about? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- File:Station name - 1.jpg and File:Station name - 2.jpg. I have placed a temporary unblock request, actually i just needed it for a discussion that is ongoing at Asansol Junction railway station. So if you have a few moments to spare, why dont you pop over and give your thoughts on it.
Superfast1111 (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for your efforts on Ganga puja! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks Doc! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
I just declined your speedy delete of Safdar. Looking back through the history the article was originally about a Village in Iran. I have reverted back to the article about the village. You should look to see if something like that happened before nominating an article for deletion, especially when the article is over 2 years old. GB fan 18:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks User:GB fan for the note. I hadn't noticed it. Will see for it next time. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Dharmadhyaksha, the article is much closer to being ready for a full-fledged DYK review: there are a couple of tags that need taking care of. It looks like it was given a copyedit a few days ago, which helps, but the current issue now is finishing the remaining sourcing.
If you mean to return to the article, please let us know on the review; it's been a week since the comment noting those remaining sourcing issues. If no action is taken or response made, we'll have to close it fairly soon, which would be a shame given the work you've put in. Thanks for your help. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Help needed
Hey, If you are interested in formatting, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashok Kumar filmography is lying at AfC for a long time. Now i edit from mobile so it is difficult to do formatting. You can request others too. Thank you -Nizil (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Dattatraya Parchure
On 2 October 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dattatraya Parchure, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Dattatraya Parchure, also called the "second Savarkar", was initially convicted but later acquitted in the assassination case of Mahatma Gandhi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dattatraya Parchure. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- Finally!! - Vivvt (Talk) 08:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Vivvt: Oh yeah! Did it in 2014 itself. Should I nominate it for something else now and slumber more? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Hii
Kindly dont put box for references. Let other people do their work stop distrubing, I have created the article Bhishek (talk) 12:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ah! WP:OWNing the article! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
references
single reference is enough for the article, if you are bored do some other work. You are anyways not bothered to contribute. If some other person takes pain and doing it, u come to disrupt, please look for other article. Bhishek (talk) 12:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
please dont disrupt the award box
reference section makes lot of mis alignments Bhishek (talk) 12:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fine! Carry on. Three sections on my page were unnecessary! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
awards box
this awards box is not just awards and nominees. We have to include categories and special screenings. This is not an article like Indias submission for Academy articles. You canttt put separate line for each film, so dont give double burden. It took herculean effort by me to prepare this article. Bhishek (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
separate line
it is not possible to put separate lines for each film in this article so please Bhishek (talk) 12:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- When said "carry on" it meant elsewhere; not here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Image Rationale
it is the only film to win highest award at cannes till date, so there is rationale, please see article list of academy awards submission from India Bhishek (talk) 12:25, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of Indian film selections and winners at the Cannes Film Festival shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard Bhishek (talk) 12:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hear, hear... Where's the source? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Non free use
If it is not acceptable to put image, admin will take care of it, why ru worried. why ru troubling other editors like this Bhishek (talk) 12:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Kettle-black-pot thing! Also read WP:DTR. And make up your mind and write all you want in one go. And do you really want Admin? We can invite some for sure. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Image Removed By me
Bhishek (talk) 12:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm! Better late than never. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ah! That's good! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jyotirlinga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pashupatinath. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
MH election
Can you change independents from white? not visible at all...maybe peach or something similarLihaas (talk) 14:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Lihaas: Hi! I tried changing the colour instant to peach shade. But turns out I don't have svg editor. Never mind, I can create a different file and upload it over the current one. But I faced another problem. We have same colours for some parties and hence I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Colour_of_politics. Do participate if you wish to. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- NP
- Smart move at the indeps boss [2]Lihaas (talk) 14:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- NP
DYK nomination of Ganga puja
There is an outstanding problem with your nomination of this article at DYK, you may wish to revisit the template for your nomination. Please let me know on my talk page if you would like me to review the nomination again. Regards, Moonraker (talk) 03:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- I have withdrawn my objection, as I think this expansion has now overcome the minor copyvio problems which were there. I have also done some copy-editing myself, I do not think the article had quite grasped what was going on with the State of Tripura after August 1947, perhaps because the article on the former princely state was also confused. I have made some corrections to that, too. Moonraker (talk) 04:15, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Ganga puja
On 13 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ganga puja, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in the Ganga puja festival, the Tripuri people of India build a temporary bamboo temple in a river stream and pray to be saved from epidemic diseases? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ganga puja. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for including my name.--Nvvchar. 14:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Maha election 2014
Hi. Hope you're well. I wondered if you knew how to change the infobox so it says BJP = 1st party rather than majority and likewise with Shiv Sena = 2nd party like how it was in the 2004 election article. It seemed strange to me to keep the majority and minority designation as they aren't in an alliance, campaigned independently and BJP is currently trying to make a minority government work. Cowlibob (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
New Year 2015 Greetings
Wishing you a Prosperous 2015!!! | |
Hello , New Year begins, let us pray that it will be a year with New Peace, New Happiness and abundance of new friends, God bless you through out the New Year.--Nvvchar. 02:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC) |